EVOLUTION AND NEW TRENDS IN URBAN MOBILITY PLANNING

Similar documents
Walking and Cycling Action Plan Summary. A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland

Will development of SUMPs improve Mobility Management in Lithuania?'

European Commission Policy, Promotion & Funding for Cycling Madeleine Kelly-Tychtl Directorate-General for Mobility & Transport

SUMPs - a new planning paradigm for sustainable urban mobility - how to bring it

Active Travel Strategy Dumfries and Galloway

Developing a Birmingham Transport Space Allocation policy. David Harris Transport Policy Manager Economy Directorate Birmingham City Council

VILNIUS SUMP. Gintarė Krušinskaitė International project manager place your logo here

CYCLING CHARTER ACTION PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan for Aberdeen, Scotland. Louise Napier Senior Planner Aberdeen City Council

WEST YORKSHIRE LTP CYCLE PROSPECTUS

Embracing Active Travel for Health. switchtravel.eu

DOE Climate Change Proposals

What s the issue for transport in Cardiff?

Policy factsheet 2 MOBILITY MANAGEMENT MEASURES FOR SCHOOLS.

FASTER. EASIER. COOLER.

Parallel Workshop: Avoid

CITY PLANNING ADMINISTRATION. The walkable city. Michael Erman, City of Stockholm Vienna/CORP 2012, 15 May 2012

Session 5: Sopot, Poland, June Kerstin Burggraf. City of Dresden, Urban Planning Office

ANNEX1 The investment required to achieve the Government s ambition to double cycling activity by 2025

GD 0043/18 ACTIVE TRAVEL STRATEGY

ABERDEEN: CITY OF THE FUTURE

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

THE PLANNING AND. Transport and the law Integrated transport planning Strategies Responsibilities of local government and road controlling authorities

InnovaSUMP Innovations in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans for lowcarbon urban transport

Greenhouse gas emissions from transport have been rising and are expected to continue to rise both in higher & lower income countries.

University of Leeds Travel Plan

Reflections on our learning: active travel, transport and inequalities

InnovaSUMP Good Practices from Exeter, Ravenna & Viseu

Launceston's Transport Futures. Greater travel options for the people of Launceston

Birmingham Connected. Edmund Salt. Transportation Policy Birmingham City Council

Using parking policy and parking levies to tackle transport and environmental issues

CIVITAS Peer to Peer Exercise in Reggio Emilia 11 November km zone: Reggio Emilia gets to know the experience of Odense and Vitoria-Gasteiz

The seamless journey The seamless journey: Public transport links with walking and cycling

Jozef Zuallaert. MobiMind ebvba

Introduction. You may find detailed information about the network from the EuroVelo website: Page 1/5

Update June 2018 OUR 2017 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

Soft measures affect traffic in Lund effects from two years work with a sustainable transport system in Lund

Tallinn Region Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan 2035

1. UK policy context

POLY-SUMP IN CITYREGION PARKSTAD LIMBURG. Paul Alzer Parkstad Limburg

The Limassol SUMP Planning for a better future. Apostolos Bizakis Limassol, May 16, th Cyprus Sustainable Mobility and ITS conference

Michael Cramer MEP. Closing Plenary Velo-City Global. Cycling in Europe. Presentation by Michael Cramer Taipei, March 1 st 2016

WELCOME. City of Greater Sudbury. Transportation Demand Management Plan

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Local Sustainable Transport Fund

CFE certification Bicycle-friendly Employer

Canada s Capital Region Delegation to the Velo-City Global 2010 Conference

March Maidstone Integrated Transport Strategy Boxley Parish Council Briefing Note. Context. Author: Parish Clerk 2 March 2016

"European Commission 2013 Urban Mobility Package"

This objective implies that all population groups should find walking appealing, and that it is made easier for them to walk more on a daily basis.

The Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy; and 20mph speed limits

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

TOWARDS A BIKE-FRIENDLY CANADA A National Cycling Strategy Overview

Integrated Urban Mobility

Urban Transport Policy-making changing perspectives and consequences

City of Szekesfehervar. Royal traditions Dominant economic role 1000 years of mobility

Aims and Objectives The main aims of the Walking Initiative pilot scheme were as follows:

Impact Assessment of a new parking pricing scheme in Madrid City Centre

PASTA City case study London Borough of Newham

Integrating health aspects into transport policy and planning. Cycling Plan in the Ile-de-France Region. Françoise GUASPARE Ile-de-France Europe

Stepping up a gear. Our vision for cycling in Cardiff

SUMP in Emilia Romagna Region and the national level»

National cycling programme investment priorities and approach summary

Cyclelogistics Ahead Empowerment Zagreb

Global Trends in cycling

Living Streets response to the Draft London Plan

THE TWO BANKS OF THE TAGUS RIVER BY INTEGRATING THE BYCICLE INTO A MULTIMODAL SYSTEM

Marta Susana Moreira. Maia Municipality

Target Group The target groups were cyclists, as well as representatives of creative arts and other members of the public.

Extracting Maximum Benefit from Parking Policy - 10 Years Experience in Perth, Australia. By Emmerson Richardson Sinclair Knight Merz

Editorial. Interview with Steven Windey. PTP-Cycle newsletter 01 February

GETTING WHERE WE WANT TO BE

HAMILTON BIKING PLAN OUR VISION: A BIKE FRIENDLY CITY

Welcome. Background. Goals. Vision

Cascade Bicycle Club Strategic Plan

Vision Public Workshop: Findings

Green Mobility. Emani Kumar. Coordinator, ICLEI Asia & Executive Director, ICLEI South Asia.

Government transport policy

NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORT: WALKING AND CYCLING IN ALL CLIMATES AND ENVIRONMENTS

Service Business Plan

WORKSHOP ON SAFE AND HEALTHY WALKING AND CYCLING IN URBAN AREAS 30 September 1 October 2010 Batumi, Georgia

Capacity of transport infrastructure networks

MASTER PLAN FOR WALKING NATIONAL STRATEGY TO PROMOTE WALKING IN AUSTRIA

9. Parking Supporting Statement

The role of the Authority in promoting sustainable transport. Gerry Murphy South East Regional Assembly 27 th May 2011

Helsinki. Explaining Active Transportation Success in a City with Winter. Karl Saidla, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Ottawa, Human Kinetics

Attaining Energy Efficient Mobility in an Ageing Society

The European Transport Safety Council s proposals for a safety component in a future EU Cycling Strategy

Cycling in the Netherlands The City and the region Utrecht

Manifesto for a safe, efficient and sustainable transport in NZ

Part 3: Active travel and public transport planning in new housing developments

The Transport Study 3Land Basel

Walking and urban planning. Maurizio TIRA Environmental Engineer, Full Professor of Town and regional planning Università degli Studi di Brescia

January Transforming cities. The potential of everyday cycling

ENFIELD TOWN THE REVISED DESIGN

Concept of Sustainable Transport and integrated Land Use Planning- An Overview. Manfred Breithaupt GIZ Water, Energy, Transport

Questionnaire for reporting on progress made since 2009 on the attainment of the Amsterdam Goals

ROAD SAFETY: the European Union Strategy and Efforts

5 DECEMBER Cycling In London. Andrew Summers, Transport for London Strategy and Policy Manager Active Travel and Health.

Mobility measures in Vitoria-Gasteiz

Transcription:

EVOLUTION AND NEW TRENDS IN URBAN MOBILITY PLANNING Simpla Conference, Trieste, 28 November 2018 Prof Tom Rye Edinburgh Napier University, Scotland, UK

Structure of presentation What is a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP)? Why is SUMP needed? What does it mean in practice? A few experiences Skills and capacities needed for SUMP How SUMPs might adapt to new forms of mobility Some resources and tools for SUMP development 2

What is SUMP? A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan is a strategic plan designed to satisfy the mobility needs of people and businesses in cities and their surroundings for a better quality of life. It builds on existing planning practices and takes due consideration of integration, participation, and evaluation principles. Manage transport system (don t just build infrastructure) to achieve wider societal objectives and realise city s wider vision A scheme developed as part of Vienna s SUMP Source: EU SUMP Guidelines, 2014 3

More interestingly, why do we need SUMPs? Consequences of the Predict and Provide approach Longer journey times and congestion Increased greenhouse gas emissions Poor air quality Poor health - obesity, poor mental health / stress, cardiovascular diseases etc Car dominated city centres and neighbourhoods Accidents, deaths, injuries 4

To me, core to SUMP: making sure we manage transport to achieve wider objectives Making sure transport contributes to: Improved air quality (local and global) Improved quality of life Reduced congestion/improved accessibility to what people need Improve social inclusion Improved safety Improved economy of our city Improved attractiveness of (public) space Improved micro-accessibility e.g. PT easy to use if disabled 5

Structure of SUMP Problem analysis but not necessarily a model Cycling Walking Objective setting, targets, indicators Approaches/measures for each mode Public transport Road safety Mobility management Parking management Vision Strategies (directions of change) Accessibility Maintenance Traffic restraint/ management Monitoring, evaluation, review Intermodality Freight MaaS Public consultation Integration with other policies planning, health, envirionment 6

The famous Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) process 7

But what does this mean in practice? Common ideas about SUMP Everyone has to sell their cars No more building new roads No more building any new transport infrastructure SUMP stops people from travelling it wants to reduce mobility SUMP in practice Some people use their car less Looking at cheaper options first but maybe build a road if it s the best way to achieve your objectives Think about what you want to achieve (safety? Better environment? Better economy?) and then choose the measures that will achieve these objectives. Think before building something About ensuring accessibility so that people can get the things they need It s only about the environment It s about environment, safety, quality of life, green space, economic growth and about how transport helps us to achieve these things We ll all be riding bikes by next year <Event> <Date> <Location> <Speaker> Slowly changing travel patterns over several years so there s a bit less car use 8

And it means planning for people not just for transport planners/traffic engineers 9

What can be achieved? Cities all over Europe have transformed themselves into much more sustainable and liveable places through integrated, strategic and long-term transport planning These videos summarise the SUMP process and how it has transformed cities http://www.eltis.org/resources/videos/sustainable-urban-mobility-plans-part-1 http://www.eltis.org/resources/videos/sustainable-urban-mobility-plans-part-2 http://www.eltis.org/resources/videos/sustainable-urban-mobility-plans-part-3 10

Quality of Life and Mobility Policy www.mercer.com 11

Can a city change its face and its economy? Since SUMP implemented: Population decline reversed people moving back into city 5% population increase 1999-2008 the 80ies today Photos: City of Gent Investment per person 20% above regional average Growth in new firms 25% above regional average (source www.gent.be) 12

Implementation with the public in mind Active information to the public about the adaption of the railway station Source: Project Gent Sint-Pieters, www.projectgentsintpieters.be/ 13

Ljubljana 14

Ljubljana 15

Economic and health benefits SOCIO-ECONOMICS Gain to society per extra km travelled by bicycle in Copenhagen Cost to society per extra km travelled by car in Copenhagen HEALTH BENEFITS OF CYCLING 2012 Copenhageners owned approximately 650,000 bicycles and 125,000 cars, corresponding to 5.2 bicycles for each car Reduction of mortality for adults who cycle to and from work every day Value of health benefits from cycling in Copenhagen (DKK) All of Copenhagen haave access to a bicycle Primary mode of transport for trips to work or educaion in he City of Copenhagen, 1996-2012 Copenhagen Excerpts from the Copenhagen Green Accounts 2012 report. Image source: City of Copenhagen 16

Krakow (PL) Improvements to bus and tram stops, to PT, to pedestrian environment, parking management in context of wider strategy Policy objectives safety, security, health, social inclusion, tourism Photo: Maciej Michnej Photo: ELTIS / Harry Schiffer 17

Improvements to PT in Krakow Before Street separators After 18

Nottingham (England) Bus and tram patronage in Greater Nottingham Trajectory Actual 19

Achievements: York (England) Achievements 2001-2006: Bus patronage growth of 45% Peak-hour urban traffic lower than 1999 levels A high quality Park & Ride service A 10% increase in non-car modes for trips to the city centre at peak times Over 20% reduction in road accidents Source: City of York council, www.york.gov.uk/transport/ltp/ltp1/delivery/ 20

Vitoria Gasteiz Spain SUMP impacts 21

Common barriers in SUMP development? Organisational roles and responsibilities internal buy in Political commitment Poor integration between policies and plans eg land-use and transport Limited resources and skills (capacity building) Funding for implementation Limited public and stakeholder support Lack of data or resources for monitoring and evaluation 22

Capacity and people skills Takes time and people resource Don t expect to do everything in your own organisation Use EU, special national projects to buy in expertise Get advice from bigger/more specialised organisations 23

Collaboration needed in SUMP between different organisations how? Recommendations for effective collaboration (from Petterson and Hrelja, 2017) Shared understanding of purpose and benefits Early participation Clear objectives and responsibilities, roles and capacities (within and among organisations) Delegate power to the individuals representing the organisations Raise difficult issues early Sufficient resources 24

The move of the private sector into mobility services how to cope? Private sector innovating new modes and services e.g.: (Shared) ridesourcing Free floating carsharing and bikesharing Peer to peer car and parking sharing But limited motivation for them to integrate with other modes and services? Need to protect their income/revenue Unlikely to become part of multimodal system unless public authorities play leading role, set framework 25

There are plenty of resources available European Platform on SUMPs www.eltis.org/mobility-plans CIVITAS PROSPERITY www.sump-network.eu CIVITAS SUITS www.suits-project.eu CIVITAS SUMPs-Up www.sumps-up.eu ADVANCE www.eu-advance.eu CH4LLENGE www.sump-challenges.eu ENDURANCE www.epomm.eu/endurance EVIDENCE www.evidence-project.eu Poly-SUMP www.poly-sump.eu Urban Transport Roadmaps www.urban-transport-roadmaps.eu CIVITAS e-courses www.civitas.eu 26

ELTIS a good source of information and the best practice http://www.eltis.org/mobility-plans/sump-concept SOLUTIONS webinar: Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (64 mins long) It is a questionnaire about the SUMP development process and enables planning authorities to measure their progress towards a genuine Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan. 27

Some Guidelines and courses on key challenges / SUMP components Guidelines can be downloaded at www.sump-challenges.eu/kits Online Training courses on these challenges available https://www.mobilityacademy.eu/course/index.php?categoryid=4 Other SUMP related online courses / webinars https://www.mobilityacademy.eu/course/ <Event> <Date> <Location> <Speaker> 28

CIVITAS Urban Mobility Tool Inventory - An online database of over 100 tools http://civitas.eu/tool-inventory Urban Transport Roadmaps tool (training session 3) www.urban-transport-roadmaps.eu A quantitative tool to support developing of scenarios, setting priorities and targets, developing effective packages of measures in the SUMP planning cycle SMP fact-based mobility planning tool (EN) http://www.wbcsdsmp.org Tool to support cities developing fact-based and integrated sustainable urban mobility plans based on the 19 sustainable mobility Indicators 29

Prof Tom Rye Transport Research Institute Edinburgh Napier University 5 Colinton Rd SCOTLAND www.napier.ac.uk t.rye@napier.ac.uk 30

www.sump-network.eu Author: Prof Tom RYE (Edinburgh Napier University) Editing: Dr Nazan Kocak (Edinburgh Napier University) Publisher: CIVITAS PROSPERITY Legal Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. All images are provided by the respective partners (unless otherwise noted) and are approved for reproduction in this publication. CIVITAS PROSPERITY has received funding from the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N o 690636 31