Springfield High School Springfield School District Delaware County - Pennsylvania Master Plan Status Update

Similar documents
Springfield High School Springfield School District Delaware County - Pennsylvania Master Plan Status Update

Roads and Vehicular Traffic Design Principles. Roads and Vehicular Traffic Recommendations

integrated action plan

PROPOSED CONVERSION OF MYRTLE BEACH MIDDLE SCHOOL TO MYRTLE BEACH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PMH. PIKE McFARLAND HALL ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS

CAMPUS PARKING STUDY Analysis and Alternatives Executive Summary

Miami Health District

Summary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009

Notes to Benefit-Cost Analysis

Princeton Avenue and Spruce Street Transportation and Site Access Enhancements Project

SPRINGFIELD REVITALIZATION REPORT

Kennedy Plaza and Providence Downtown Transit Connector PUBLIC MEETING. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

California Department of Transportation, District 4. Sloat Boulevard Project Skyline Blvd. to 19 th Ave. Community Update January 13, 2016

PROJECT OBJECTIVES. Improve vehicle capacity for the intersection. Improve pedestrian and bicycle access

Project Overview. Rolling Road Widening Fairfax County. Get Involved. Design Public Hearing. Contact Information

Brooklyn Boulevard (County Road 152) Reconstruction Project Phase I. OPEN HOUSE June 20, 2017

Elmhurst Metra Station. Public Hearing Wednesday - November 30, 2016

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project.

Implementation Matrix

About the study. North Milwaukee Ave. Key goals of this study are to: Achieve Vision Zero* by. Harmonize the space and improve walkability

TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS

CSAH 101 Preliminary Design

Transportation. Pages E-3 to E-145 PROPOSED FY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) CCCRC Presentation Thursday, June 14, 2018

Community Meeting February 27, 2007 Dorchester Avenue Transportation & Streetscape Improvements Action Plan February 27, 2007

Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018

WELCOME. Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018

Chapter 3.9 Timbercrest Elementary School. Volusia County MPO. November 2008

Ocean Park Boulevard Streetscape Improvement Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox (Excerpt from Figure 3.1)

Vehicular and Pedestrian Access to Herndon Metrorail Station. Robert B. Boxer, Director John Stuart, Clark Nexen October 28, 2015

6.4 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Feasibility Study of Pedestrian Crossings Along Route 7, East of Cascades Parkway and West of Dranesville Road. October 3, 2017

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

The following is submitted together with the plans and application for the staff and plan commission consideration of approval.

ROUNDABOUTS. Improving Safety and Efficiency. SR83 & Smithville Western Rd. Joel Montgomery, PE Director of Administration

SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD CORRIDOR

DALLAS MIDTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOCUS NORTH TEXAS Peer Chacko, AICP, Assistant Director, City of Dallas

FOCUS AREA 1 - Alberta Avenue Pocket Park 3 (121 Ave and 92 St)

Traffic Improvements for the Transit Oriented Development District (TODD) Meriden Public Library March 11, 2014

BELFAST RAPID TRANSIT. Ciarán de Búrca Director, Transport Projects Division Department for Regional Development

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

Design of Turn Lane Guidelines

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

OCALA/MARION TPO CITY OF BELLEVIEW CORRIDOR PLAN STUDY PRESENTATION TO THE BELLEVIEW CITY COMMISSION JANUARY 25, :00 PM

Paoli Road Improvement Feasibility Study

Works Approval Application. G.2 Traffic

Figure 4-10: Pedestrian Improvements Types of Potential Station Area Improvements - Place-Making Improvements

Public Involvement Outreach Requirements for Public Information Open House Meeting: C.N , HSIP-5003(12) 132 nd and West Center Road, Omaha

Pensacola Beach. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Special Meeting

THE ALAMEDA CONCEPT DESIGN COMMUNITY MEETING 3. A Plan for The Beautiful Way JANUARY 28, 2010

Working Group Meeting

Dewey Area Traffic Calming Project

Charles Barrett. Support Educational Program. Charles Barrett Total. Support Educational Program

Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF

Memo. Ocean Avenue Corridor Design Project Public Workshop #2 Summary

Dartmouth College Parking, Traffic, & Pedestrian Circulation. Master Plan 2001

Indiana University Campus Bus Service. Bus Stop Consolidation

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CHESTNUT HILL COLLEGE MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT

Make Lincoln Highway an economically vibrant corridor that is safe, efficient, and beautiful for local residents and visitors.

01. VICINITY OF GREENBRAE POC: EXISTING CONDITIONS

Meadow Woods Elementary School

Superintendent s Proposed Capital Improvements Program. Fiscal Years (Revised January 14, 2019)

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Circulation Improvement Strategy. Chapter 5: Improvement Strategy. Cross Street Neighborhood Improvement Plan

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Project Design New Softball Stadium MU

Other Initiatives. Highest 10 Year Value Projects Capital Budget and Financing Plan

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Road Diets FDOT Process

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

Table #6 VISION CHARACTERISTICS

Existing Transportation System

Streetscape: Core Shopping District

McGrath Boulevard Project Development Public Meeting #2 May 28 th, 2015 East Somerville Community School

City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

Welcome to the Quebec Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

including infrastructure, transit and open space, Open Space changed approximately 50 to approximately 60

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

A Downtown Transformed Through Partnerships: the Portland Mall Story

Wyldewood Estates. Pre-Application Public Engagement Summary of Issues and Responses

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Baseball and Books. Master of Architecture. Jacob Tuzzo

City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

New Park Avenue Corridor West Hartford


Areas for Redevelopment or New Development:

DRAFT. A fifth objective, other considerations, has been added to capture considerations not captured by the four primary objectives.

Inter River Sub Area Transportation Study District of North Vancouver Stakeholder Meeting #2b Meeting Minutes

Iowa Highway 58 Corridor Improvement Study

Queensboro Bridge Bus Priority Study: Summary of Recommendations. Presentation to Manhattan Community Board 8 May 4, 2011

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY VISIONING MEETING. August 23 24, 2017

Roundabouts The Virginia Experience

Transcription:

1 WRT 1 Springfield High School Springfield School District Delaware County - Pennsylvania Master Plan Status Update Presentation to Springfield School District School Board Meeting / Executive Session- January 23, 2014

2 WRT 2 Outline Senior High School Projections / Education Goals Right Sizing the Box / Program Goals Existing Facility Facility Master Plan Options Financing and Schedule Discussion

Senior High School Projections / Education Goals 3 WRT 3

44WRT

55WRT

Right Sizing the Box / Program Goals 6 WRT 6

Enrollment Projections based on tenth day counts 7 7 WRT 1600 1500 1400 1300 1450 students 1270 students SWING ZONE 1200 1100 Smith: 9-12 PDE: 9-12 Actual: 9-12 1000 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 COMMITTEE CHARGE: Assume maximum projection 1270 - expandable to 1450 students (implies 4400 total students)

Program Comparison 8 WRT 8

Comparative Analysis 9 9 WRT 300 275 Square Feet Per Student 250 225 238 237 200 175 150 198 183 172 169 165 158 184 185 125 141 100 75 50 25 0 Springfield - Present Upper Merion Area Lower Moreland Township Centennial Upper Moreland Wissahickon Springfield - Future Unionville Garnet Valley Chadds Ford Average of Average of (60 Schools) All Ref (8 Schools) Group

Comparative Analysis Delaware County 10 10 WRT

Proposed Site Program 11 11 WRT Extra Field

Existing Facility 12 12 WRT

Zoning Zoning & Land Use WRT 1313

Public Use and Connection to Main Street Zoning & Land Use WRT 1414

Site Circulation 15 15 WRT Zoning Site Circulation Parking Utilities Athletics & Fields

Parking Study 16 16 WRT Zoning Site Circulation Parking Utilities Athletics & Fields

Event Parking 17 17 WRT Zoning Site Circulation Parking Utilities Athletics & Fields

WRT 1818 Opportunities & Constraints Campus Edges Connections Construction Limits

Basement & First Floor 19 19 WRT Below Grade Science Industrial Arts Theater and Music Fine Arts Food Services Athletics F.C.S. Special Ed. Computer Labs Large Group Instruction Administration District Administration Faculty Planning Existing Building Program

Summary 20 20 WRT Asbestos Roofing Windows Envelope HVAC Plumbing Electric Code Renovation Challenges Building Performance Summary

Asbestos Roof Deck 21 21 WRT Composite of All Floors Renovation Challenges Building Performance Summary

Roofing Replacement 22 22 WRT Composite of All Floors Renovation Challenges Building Performance Summary

Windows Replacement 23 23 WRT Legend should read Renovation Challenges Not salvageable Composite of All Floors Renovation Challenges Building Performance Summary

Low Performance Envelope 24 24 WRT Composite of All Floors Renovation Challenges Building Performance Summary

Outdated HVAC 25 25 WRT The only thing worth saving are the tools. Composite of All Floors Renovation Challenges Building Performance Summary

Outdated Plumbing System 26 26 WRT Composite of All Floors Renovation Challenges Building Performance Summary

Electric Upgrade & Capacity 27 27 WRT Composite of All Floors Renovation Challenges Building Performance Summary

Life Safety & Code Issues 28 28 WRT Composite of All Floors Renovation Challenges Building Performance Summary

Summary 29 29 WRT Asbestos Roofing Windows Envelope HVAC Plumbing Composite of Issues Electric Code Renovation Challenges Building Performance Summary

Performance Challenges Summary 30 30 WRT Glare issues Along Leamy Facade Access to Daylight Circulation & Accessibility Programmatic Fit Composite of Issues Building Renovation Goals Challenges Day Lighting Circulation Building & Accessibility Performance Programmatic Fit Summary

Existing Building Challenges 31 31 WRT Renovation Challenges Building Performance Composite of Issues Building Renovation Goals Challenges Day Lighting Circulation Building & Accessibility Performnce Programmatic Fit Summary

32 32 WRT Guiding Principles Create the optimal learning environment for education Strengthen connections to the broader community Promote the use of the School as a place for the community : Town Center Create a sustainable School that deploys the best in high performance building design to reduce energy consumption and promote classroom achievement. Guiding Principles Site/Campus Goals

33 33 WRT Site/Campus Goals Improve circulation and connections to school. Add athletic fields and improve their quality. Increase parking capacity of campus without impacting goals for athletic program. Minimize vehicular circulation within the campus. Promote walking and public transit. Increase amount of community green space. Guiding Principles Site/Campus Goals

Facility Master Plan Options 34 34 WRT

Three Options Compared Detailed Review for Phasing / Cost Existing Building (Service Life Extension) Leamy Ave. New Building Saxer Ave. New Building 35 35 WRT

36 36 WRT KEY SCOPE ITEMS Reduction of building size; consolidation of program components. PROGRAM ELEMENTS REMOVED Relocation of District Office and Bus Parking Building Performance and design upgrades : Hazmat removal Life-safety Energy performance Building Systems Accessibility NEW ENTRANCE; IMPROVE IMAGE FROM STREET NEW FIELDS Building Design / Identity Existing Building Service Life Extension Plan

37 37 WRT PHASING CHALLENGES Remediation of Roof Deck and building envelope: exposure to elements. Building Systems: service interruptions Significant Building Renovation scope: Cannot to be completed within Summer periods Construction Phasing Schedule long and complex Existing Building Service Life Extension Phasing

38 38 WRT Leamy Ave. Site Plan

39 39 WRT PHASING CHALLENGES Building Systems : service interruptions (location of existing plant and utilities) Significant Overlap of Existing Building with Proposed Building: Complex Construction Phasing Leamy Ave. Site Phasing

40 40 WRT Saxer Avenue Site Plan

41 41 WRT SAXER AVENUE SITE TRACK/FIELD SHIFTED TRAFFIC CALMING DROP-OFF CIRCLE SIMPLIFY INTERSECTION ACQUISITION AND REDEVELOPMENT OF ROLLING ROAD Saxer Avenue Site Plan

42 42 WRT PHASING OPPORTUNITIES New School can be developed while Existing School remains fully operational Track and Field can be relocated prior to any other work; only rear parking would be displaced Geothermal Wellfield : under track or parking Saxer Avenue Site Phasing

43 43 WRT SAXER AVENUE SITE SHARED PARKING RE-ALIGN ROAD PRIVATE PROPERTY ACQUISITION SITE IMPROVEMENTS ENTRY / PLAZA ON SAXER Saxer Avenue Site Possible Off-Campus Improvements Land Swap/Acquisition

Renovation vs. New Construction Maintain / Upgrade Existing vs. New Educational Opportunities 44 44 WRT

Renovation vs. New Construction Maintain / Upgrade Existing vs. New Educational Opportunities 45 45 WRT

Renovation vs. New Construction Maintain / Upgrade Existing vs. New Educational Opportunities 46 46 WRT

47 47 WRT Project Cost Estimates Plan

Financing and Schedule 48 48 WRT

Discussion 49 49 WRT

50 50

51 51 WRT Three Options Compared Detailed Review for Phasing / Process Existing Building Service Life Extension Leamy Ave. Site Saxer Ave. Site

52 52 WRT KEY SCOPE ITEMS Reduction of building size; consolidation of program components. PROGRAM ELEMENTS REMOVED Relocation of District Office and Bus Parking Building Performance and design upgrades : Hazmat removal Life-safety Energy performance Building Systems Accessibility NEW ENTRANCE; IMPROVE IMAGE FROM STREET NEW FIELDS Building Design / Identity Existing School Service Life Extension Plan

53 53 WRT PHASING CHALLENGES Remediation of Roof Deck and building envelope : exposure to elements. Building Systems : service interruptions Significant Building Renovation scope : Cannot to be completed within Summer periods Construction Phasing Schedule long and complex Existing School Service Life Extension Phasing

54 54 WRT Leamy Ave. Site Existing Site with New Building Overlay

55 55 WRT Leamy Ave. Site Phase 1A

56 56 WRT Leamy Ave. Site Phase 1B

Leamy Ave. Site Phase 2 57 57 WRT

Leamy Ave. Site Phase 3 58 58 WRT

59 59 WRT LEAMY AVENUE SITE Leamy Ave. Site Completion of site improvements

60 60 WRT SAXER AVENUE SITE TRACK/FIELD SHIFTED TRAFFIC CALMING DROP-OFF CIRCLE SIMPLIFY INTERSECTION ACQUISITION AND REDEVELOPMENT OF ROLLING ROAD Saxer Avenue Site

61 61 WRT SAXER AVENUE SITE Phasing Notes New School can be developed while Existing School remains fully operational Track and Field can be relocated prior to any other work; only rear parking would be displaced Geothermal Wellfield : under track or parking Saxer Avenue Site Phasing