Evaluation of Unstructured WAVEWATCH III for Nearshore Application

Similar documents
Coastal Wave Studies FY13 Summary Report

Coastal Wave Energy Dissipation: Observations and Modeling

A US NOPP project to stimulate wave research

An IOOS Operational Wave Observation Plan Supported by NOAA IOOS Program & USACE

Surface Wave Dynamics in the Coastal Zone

Wave energy converter effects on wave and sediment circulation

Implementation of the new French operational coastal wave forecasting system and application to a wavecurrent interaction study

Analysis of Wave Predictions from the Coastal Model Test Bed using cbathy

DUXBURY WAVE MODELING STUDY

Development and Implementation of a Relocatable Coastal and Nearshore Modeling System

Generalized Wave-Ray Approach for Propagation on a Sphere and Its Application to Swell Prediction

Pathways Interns: Annika O Dea, Ian Conery, Andrea Albright

Wave Transformation Modeling with Bottom Friction Applied to the Southeast Oahu Reefs. Mary A. Cialone and Jane McKee Smith

Simulation of hydraulic regime and sediment transport in the Mekong delta coast

Appendix E Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis

Waves. G. Cowles. General Physical Oceanography MAR 555. School for Marine Sciences and Technology Umass-Dartmouth

Beach Wizard: Development of an Operational Nowcast, Short-Term Forecast System for Nearshore Hydrodynamics and Bathymetric Evolution

Time Dependent Wave Setup During Hurricanes on the Mississippi Coast. D. Slinn, A. Niedoroda,, R. Dean, R. Weaver, C. Reed, and J. Smith.

MIKE Release General product news for Marine software products, tools & features. Nov 2018

Passage Key Inlet, Florida; CMS Modeling and Borrow Site Impact Analysis

Appendix D: SWAN Wave Modelling

On the use of a high resolution wind forcing in the operational coastal wave model WW3

INVESTIGATION OF WAVE AGITATION INSIDE THE NEW FISHERY PORT (CASE STUDY: NEW MRZOUKA FISHERY PORT, LIBYA)

On the use of a high resolution wind forcing in the operational coastal wave model WW3

Nearshore wave-flow modelling with SWASH

Wave research at Department of Oceanography, University of Hawai i

CALCASIEU SALINITY STRUCTURES. HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING (To Support Design of Salinity Barriers)

Wave Transformation, Prediction, and Analysis at Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii

Physical Modeling of Nearshore Placed Dredged Material Rusty Permenter, Ernie Smith, Michael C. Mohr, Shanon Chader

CMS Modeling of the North Coast of Puerto Rico

Limited Data, Complex Coastline and Successful Wave Modeling Challenges, Solutions and Lessons Learned

WAVE PREDICTIONS AT THE SITE OF A WAVE ENERGY CONVERSION ARRAY

Town of Duck, North Carolina

Nearshore Dredged Material Placement Pilot Study at Noyo Harbor, CA

Prediction of Nearshore Waves and Currents: Model Sensitivity, Confidence and Assimilation

An Investigation of the Influence of Waves on Sediment Processes in Skagit Bay

WAVE FORECASTING FOR OFFSHORE WIND FARMS

Predicting wave conditions in a coral embayment from offshore directional spectral model input

Synoptic Lab, MET 421, Test 2

Coastal Sediment Transport Modeling Ocean Beach & San Francisco Bight, CA

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

Model Predictions and Sensitivity Analysis of Nearshore Processes over Complex Bathymetry

SWELL PREDICTION FOR THE EAST KOREAN COAST

INTRODUCTION TO COASTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT

Town of Duck, North Carolina

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 116 (2015 )

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 116 (2015 )

Comparisons of Physical and Numerical Model Wave Predictions with Prototype Data at Morro Bay Harbor Entrance, California

PHYSICAL AND NUMERICAL MODELLING OF WAVE FIELD IN FRONT OF THE CONTAINER TERMINAL PEAR - PORT OF RIJEKA (ADRIATIC SEA)

Nearshore Wave Prediction System Model Output Statistics (NWPS MOS): Improvement upon the NOAA Probabilistic Rip Current Forecast Model

CHAPTER 6 DISCUSSION ON WAVE PREDICTION METHODS

Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA

The construction of Deepwater Navigation Channel (DNC) in the Bystry arm of the Danube Delta has started in The whole project provides the

Wave Energy Atlas in Vietnam

Update: UNSW s Research Program for Extreme Waves on Fringing Reefs. Matt Blacka,Kristen Splinter, Ron Cox

Establishment of a Proxy Wave Climate for Coastal Modeling in the Southern California Bight

Training program on Modelling: A Case study Hydro-dynamic Model of Zanzibar channel

TITLE: The Importance of Model Validation: Two Case Studies. AUTHOR:Julie Thomas. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA.

NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTION

IMPACTS OF COASTAL PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON THE COASTS OF CRETE: NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS

JCOMM Technical Workshop on Wave Measurements from Buoys

BILLY BISHOP TORONTO CITY AIRPORT PRELIMINARY RUNWAY DESIGN COASTAL ENGINEERING STUDY

Taranaki Tsunami Inundation Analysis. Prepared for Taranaki Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. Final Version

Effect of Hydrodynamics on Sediment Transport near a Coastal Inlet

NUMERICAL STUDY OF WIND-GENERATED WAVES IN THE RED SEA

Nearshore Morphodynamics. Bars and Nearshore Bathymetry. Sediment packages parallel to shore, that store beach sediment

PARAMETRIZATION OF WAVE TRANSFORMATION ABOVE SUBMERGED BAR BASED ON PHYSICAL AND NUMERICAL TESTS

ABSTRACT. KEY WORDS: Navigation safety; numerical modeling; waves; current; sediment transport; channel infilling; morphology change.

SURF ZONE HYDRODYNAMICS COMPARISON OF MODELLING AND FIELD DATA

Evaluation of a proposed solution to beach erosion at Negril

Surface Wave Dynamics in the Coastal Zone

Wave Transformation and Setup from a Cross-shore Array of Acoustic Doppler Profilers (Poster)

SPECTRAL MODELING OF WAVE PROPAGATION IN COASTAL AREAS WITH A HARBOR NAVIGATION CHANNEL

Model Test Bed for Evaluating Wave Models and Best Practices for Resource Assessment and Characterization

Directional Wave Spectra from Video Images Data and SWAN Model. Keywords: Directional wave spectra; SWAN; video images; pixels

Ongoing Research at the USACE Field Research Facility Jeff Waters, PhD Chief, Coastal Observations & Analysis Branch Coastal & Hydraulics Lab

Nearshore Wind-Wave Forecasting at the Oregon Coast. Gabriel García, H. Tuba Özkan-Haller, Peter Ruggiero November 16, 2011

Validation Test Report for Delft3D

Energy from seas and oceans

Wave Loads in Shallow Water 12th International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting, Hawaii s Big Island, Oct. 30th Nov.

STUDY ON TSUNAMI PROPAGATION INTO RIVERS

WAVE PERIOD FORECASTING AND HINDCASTING INVESTIGATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF

An Investigation of the Influence of Waves on Sediment Processes in Skagit Bay

Wave-structure interaction in OpenFOAM What is the role of the structural boundary layer? And how can we model it?

MULTIDECADAL SHORELINE EVOLUTION DUE TO LARGE-SCALE BEACH NOURISHMENT JAPANESE SAND ENGINE? Abstract

WaMoS II Wave Monitoring System

THE WAVE CLIMATE IN THE BELGIAN COASTAL ZONE

The role of large-scale modes of climate variability on the Cape Point wave record

HYDRODYNAMICS AND MORPHODYNAMICS IN THE SURF ZONE OF A DISSIPATIVE BEACH

NWEI. Fred.Olsen. Columbia Power

COFFS HARBOUR SEDIMENT MODELLING AND INVESTIGATION

Applications of ELCIRC at LNEC

Modeling Sediment Transport Along the Upper Texas Coast

Aerodynamic Shape Design of the Bow Network Monitoring Equipment of High-speed Train

Ocean Waves and Surf Forecasting: Wave Climate and Forecasting

Methodology and Results for Nearshore Wave Simulation in a Coupled Hydrodynamic and Wave Model System to Evaluate Storm Surge in Coastal Louisiana

Are Advanced Wind Flow Models More Accurate? A Test of Four Models

LATLAS. Documentation

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY. of an Application under Section 38 of the Act for Marine Consents by Trans-Tasman Resources Limited

Transcription:

Evaluation of Unstructured WAVEWATCH III for Nearshore Application Jane McKee Smith, Tyler Hesser, Mary Anderson Bryant USACE Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulics Lab Aron Roland BGS IT&E GmbH and Mathieu Dutour Sikiric Laboratory of Satellite Oceanography, Department of Environmental and Marine Research Rudjer Bosković Institute 13 September 2017

Motivation Flexibility and high resolution for nearshore wave-driven processes: Nearshore circulation Wave set up Sediment transport Accuracy and Efficiency

Unstructured WW3 Drivers: Multi-scale coverage ~ 3 orders of magnitude Implicit solution scheme and domain decomposition for efficient computations explicit integration scheme limits Δt (1m resolution ~ Δt 0. 3 s) Collaboration with NOAA NCEP: Arun Chawla, Henrique Alves, Andre van der Westhuysen, Ali Abdolali

Parallel Computing in WW3 WW3 was inherently designed to run parallel based on global arrays, but parallel propagation is limited by number of spectral bins Constraint relaxed by introducing a Multigrid option (Multigrid decomposition) Hybrid approach to parallelization involves spectral partitioning for advection in geographical space and domain decomposition for spectral advection and the source terms integration Proposed effort to replace global arrays with local arrays, optimize the model with respect to memory management, and implement parallel output within the domain decomposition framework

Domain Decomposition in ADCIRC/WW3 based on METIS/ParMETIS

PDLIB Decomposition Library by IT&E GmbH PDLIB lib is a versatile parallel data structure and data exchange library that is written in Fortran 2003 and based on the decomposition of METIS/ParMETIS PDLIB provides subroutines to synchronize information during the solution procedure among the various sub-domains PDLIB had superb scaling on ECMWF/NCEP infrastructure for WWM-III (Roland, 2008) implicit/explicit. The parallelization strategy and numerics are now ported to WW3 Need to reduce local memory footprint in WW3 By including ESMF we can have different grids for circulation and waves

New Developments in Numerical Integration of the Wave Action Equation Fully implicit integration of the advection part of the WAE New convergent action limiter ~ mix of Komen et al. + Hersbach and Janssen New integration of the action limiter, e.g. no influence of the limiter on the propagation, only limit the source terms No numerical limiters on the wave breaking source term -- limit the wave height with the Miche criterion (Battjes & Janssen does not work on steep slopes) New Block-Jacobi and Block-Gauss-Seidel solvers with improved convergence criteria and efficient parallel implementation

Extension of WW3 Tools for Unstructured Grids Software Implicit/explicit domain decomposition PolyMesh ~ mesh generation PDLIB ~ parallel decomposition Calibration/Validation Suite Laboratory Analytical cases US East Coast and Gulf of Mexico US Great Lakes USACE Field Research Facility, Duck, NC Mediterranean

USACE Field Research Facility (FRF) Outer Banks of North Carolina Cross-shore array of directional wave measurements: Buoys: 26 and 17 m depth AWACs: 11, 8, 6, 4.5, and 3.5 m depth Winds and water levels at end of 560 m pier Regular bathymetry surveys

Storm Selection Identified four storms: Hurricane Irene (Aug 2011) Nov 2011 Hurricane Sandy (Oct 2012) Feb 2013 Criterion Two largest events (Irene & Sandy ~ 7 m waves) Combined sea/swell event, 2.75 m waves (Nov 2011) Slanting fetch, 5 m waves (Feb 2013) Cross-shore array & offshore buoy operational Future: BathyDuck (2015, extratropical + H. Joaquin), full year simulation

FRF Unstructured Grid 440k nodes, resolution 500 10 m 20 km x 50 km, 26-m depth to shore

Field Benchmarking H. Sandy FRF ST4, JONSWAP Friction, 300 s implicit time step 17 m depth 8 m depth 6 m depth

Field Benchmarking H. Irene FRF ST4, JONSWAP Friction, 300 s implicit time step 17 m depth 6 m depth 5 m depth

Errors Wave Height: Bias: -0.31 m RMS: 0.60 m Peak Period Bias: -0.22 s RMS: 1.7 s

Irene Wave Height: Bias: -0.31 m RMS: 0.60 m Peak Period Bias: -0.22 s (without Irene -0.02 s) RMS: 1.7 s (without Irene 0.87 s)

Errors Wave Height: Bias: -0.31 m (without Irene -0.29 m) RMS: 0.60 m (without Irene 0.47 m) Peak Period Bias: -0.22 s (without Irene -0.02 s) RMS: 1.7 s (without Irene 0.87 s)

Parallel Efficiency

Summary WAVEWATCH III is a viable option for nearshore application: Implicit solver + domain decomposition Explore lateral boundary conditions Couple with CSTORM (circulation) Investigation bottom friction and wave breaking Run a year-long validation