REFERENCE 1. COM 2. FT&C 3. BILL NO. AND SPONSOR:

Similar documents
SB 8 - GAMING SALE OF LOTTERY TICKETS AT POINT-OF-SALE TERMINALS

Slot machines and slot machine components

SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to pari-mutuel wagering. (BDR )

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION. Division of Pari Mutuel Wagering. Fiscal Year th Annual Report

RACING AND ATHLETICS REGULATION 6 SIMULCAST WAGERING

SECTION 1: NARRATIVE a. Current Law: Currently no video lottery terminals (VLT s) are allowed at licensed pari-mutuel facilities in Florida.

SEMINOLE COMPACT , FS 1 Ratifies the 2015 Gaming Compact executed by the Governor- with required, specified amendments.

80th Oregon Legislative Assembly 2019 Regular Session PRELIMINARY

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 9, 2017

Office of the County Auditor 115 S. Andrews Avenue, Room 520 Fort Lauderdale, Florida FAX

Session of HOUSE BILL No By Committee on Commerce, Labor and Economic Development 2-12

INITIATIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION STATEMENT. Authorizes Miami-Dade and Broward County Voters to Approve Slot Machines in Parimutuel Facilities

Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering

New York State Assembly Sheldon Silver, Speaker

SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations with respect to the withholding

William Crawford, Executive Director Ohio State Racing Commission

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION SENATE BILL DRS45071-MQf-19. Short Title: Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting. (Public)

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Maryland Thoroughbred and Harness Horse Racing Tracks

IC Chapter 7. Conduct of Gambling Games at Racetracks

ARTICLE 14. CASINO SIMULCASTING

Prepared By: Environmental Preservation Committee REVISED: 3/29/05. Please see last section for Summary of Amendments

LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH COMMISSION PDF VERSION

Maryland Thoroughbred and Harness Horse Racing Tracks

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.

OFFICIAL RULES: 2018 $ 500 JANUARY CH ALLENGE

61D General Definitions.

Maryland Thoroughbred and Harness Horse Racing Tracks

Professional Regulation

PART V. HARNESS RACING COMMISSION

Authorized By: New Jersey Racing Commission, Frank Zanzuccki Executive Director

THE ULTIMATE BETTING CHALLENGE Saturday, March 9, 2019 OFFICIAL RULES

Working Draft: Gaming Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition

PEGASUS WORLD CUP BETTING CHAMPIONSHIP Gulfstream Park January 25 & 26, 2019

OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION

Video Lottery/Tourism Promotion

CHAPTER 65. PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 65. PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Hearing on Keno Bingo & Slots IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. June 17, :00 a.m.

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY LEGISLATIVE FISCAL NOTE (REVISED)

A Bill Regular Session, 2005 SENATE BILL 999

WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE

Enabling Legislation New York Thoroughbred Breeding and Development Fund

Official Rules 2018 Aqueduct Challenge

Ontario Horse Racing Industry Performance Results [Fiscal Year Q2]

MINUTES OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY. Seventy-ninth Session March 21, 2017

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK September 2015

STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA RACING COMMISSION STATEMENT OF NEED AND REASONABLENESS GENERAL

This is a real money handicapping contest with players competing with live money wagering cards. This contest requires a $500 buy-in, per entry.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Proposed Changes to 205 CMR 6.00 Pari-mutuel rules for thoroughbred racing, harness racing, and greyhound racing.

The Economic Impact of Kentucky s Equine Industry. Dr. C. Jill Stowe Department of Agricultural Economics University of Kentucky

Comments on Your Government

HORSE RACING AND CALIFORNIA FAIRS

S 0037 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. vs. CASE NO. SC

Gaming Control Subcommittee

Proponents of expanding gambling in. tracks will save the horse industry by increasing i purses for horse races by

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

New Jersey Racing Commission, Frank Zanzuccki, Executive Director. See Summary below for explanation of exception to calendar requirement.

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LEGISLATORS FROM GAMING STATES COMMITTEE ON PARI-MUTUELS LAS VEGAS, NEVADA FRIDAY, JANUARY 9, :45 P.M. 3:45 P.M.

[First Reprint] SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED SEPTEMBER 24, 2018

Official Rules 2019 Belmont Stakes Challenge

Atlantic Provinces Harness Racing Commission Act

Table of Contents. LETTER TO THE GOVERNOR ARIZONA RACING COMMISSION 1 DEPARTMENT OF RACING Department Organization Chart 2

Ontario Horse Racing Industry Performance Results [Fiscal Year Q3]

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK September 2015

Ontario Horse Racing Industry Performance Results [Fiscal Year Q1]

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Ch. 870 SUPER 6 LOTTO CHAPTER 870. SUPER 6 LOTTO

Ontario Horse Racing Industry Performance Results [Fiscal Year Q1]

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 14, 2018

[First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 10, 2018

Days of Festivus Challenge HANDICAPPING CONTEST RULES

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

CHAPTER 551 SLOT MACHINES Powers and duties of the division and law enforcement.

5(sf. DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING of the DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION COR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, '351.

CHAPTER 9 RULES FOR PARI-MUTUEL BETTING

Effect of Proposed Lawrence Downs Casino and Racing Resort on Racing in Western Pennsylvania

Funding Agreement & New Ontario Racing Overview. Spring 2018

Tote Ninja. Pari-mutuel Wager Placement Guide. Version 1.0

Tote Ninja. Pari-mutuel Wager Placement Guide. Version 1.0

New York State Racing by the Numbers in 2008

Trends in Gambling Revenue to the States

BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

New York Racing By the Numbers in 2005

Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer s Copyright Authority No dated 02 February 1998

2019 State of the New Jersey Horse Racing Industry

ORGANIZATIONAL & OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW

CONNECTICUT LOTTERY CORPORATION OFFICIAL GAME RULES "Connecticut CASH5"

Thoroughbred Racetrack Economics: Emerging Issues in Competition, Regulation, and Wagering

ANNUAL REPORT MARYLAND RACING COMMISSION NINETY-SEVENTH STATE OF MARYLAND

Regulatory Analysis Form (1) Agency

T.D CLICK HERE to return to the home page. Internal Revenue Bulletin:

TRPB TOTE SECURITY SYSTEM

G. Pick (n) Pools (1) The Pick (n) requires selection of the first-place finisher in each of a designated number of contests. The association must

M E E T I N G A N N O U N C E M E N T

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

OFFICIAL RULES FOR THE APRIL 14, 2018 KEENELAND $400 FALL CHALLENGE

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1318

Transcription:

REVISED: June 4, 1984 BILL NO. CS/SB 0088 DATE: April 11, 1984 Page _1_ SENATE STAFF ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT l. 2. 3. STAFF DIRECTOR Mart in ~Pit! REFERENCE 1. COM 2. FT&C 3. ACTION Fav./ CS SUBJECT: Pari-mutuel Wagering BILL NO. AND SPONSOR: CS/HB 246 substituted for (CS/SB 0088 by Commerce and Senator McPherson) Signed by Governor Ch. 84-9, Laws of Florida I. SUMMARY: A. Present Situation: Section 550.35, Florida Statutes, prohibits the transmittal of certain information relating to any horseracing or dogracing from any racetrack in this state between certain times. The Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering may, by rule, permit the immediate transmission by radio, television, or press wire of any pertinent racing information concerning not more than two feature races each week with certain exceptions. Gulfstream and Hialeah racetracks are presently simulcasting races to New York for off-track wagering. B. Effect of Proposed Changes: This bill would authorize race tracks and frontons to transmit broadcasts of races or games out-of-state. This would permit off-track betting in other states on Florida races and games. At least 80 percent of the races or games in each performance on which wagers are taken must be live races or games unless the permitholder is unable to fill the daily race or game card or the division has approved otherwise. The bill would also allow any horse track to receive broadcast of horse racing conducted outside the state and to accept parimutuel wagering on these races. The money wagered would be subject to state taxes on the same basis as the wagering on the races actually conducted at the Florida tracks. Each dog track and jai-alai fronton may also receive dog races or jai-alai game transmission from out-of-state. These wagers would also be subject to the state tax. No payment may be made to a patron holding a pri-mutuel ticket on a transmitted race or game until such race or game is confirmed official by the stewards, judges, or other similar body at the originating racetrack or fronton. This bill also redefines "racketeering activity" to include acts relating to jai alai frontons. Violation of the provisions of this bill would be a third degree felony.

REVISED: June 4, 1984 BILL NO. CS/SB 0088 DATE: April 11, 1984 Page _2_ II. ECONOMIC IMPACT AND FISCAL NOTE: A. Public: Tracks and frontons may experience increased attendance if broadcast of out-of-state racing is received. This may lead to a slight increase in handle. B. Government: III. COMMENTS: As the wagering on events from other states has not in the past been permitted at pari-mutuel facilities in this state, it is not possible to accurately forecast the impact on wagering. The Department of Business Regulation estimates a minimum of $4,200,000 in handle from wagering on out-of-state events. This would result in approximately $138,600 in increased revenue for the General Fund. Technical errors -- none noted.

REVISED: April 11, 1984 BILL NO. CS/SB 0088 DATE: April 9, 1984 Page _1_ SENATE STAFF ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT l. 2. 3. SUBJECT: ANALYST Forti STAFF DI-RECTOR <?011( Martin REFERENCE 1. COM 2. FT&C 3. ACTION Fav./ CS BILL NO. AND SPONSOR: Pari-mutuel Wagering CS/SB 0088 by Commerce and Senator McPherson I. SUMMARY: A. Present Situation: Section 550.35, Florida Statutes, prohibits the transmittal of certain information relating to any horseracing or dogracing from any racetrack in this state between certain times. The Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering may, by rule, permit the immediate transmission by radio, television, or press wire of any pertinent racing information concerning not more than two feature races each week with certain exceptions. Gulfstream and Hialeah racetracks are presently simulcasting races to New York for off-track wagering. B. Effect of Proposed Changes: This bill would authorize race tracks and frontons to transmit broadcasts of races or games out-of-state. This would permit off-track betting in other states on Florida races and games. At least 80 percent of the races or games in each performance on which wagers are taken must be live races or games unless the permitholder is unable to fill the daily race or game card or the division has approved otherwise.. The bill would also allow any horse track to receive broadcasts of horse racing conducted outside the state and to accept parimutuel wagering on these races. The money wagered would be subject to state taxes on the same basis as the wagering on the races actually conducted at the Florida tracks. Each dog track and jai-alai fronton may also receive dog races or jai-alai game transmission from out-of-state. These wagers would also be subject to the state tax. No payment may be made to a patron holding a pri-mutuel ticket on a transmitted race or game until such race or game is confirmed official by the stewards, judges, or other simil~r body at the originating racetrack or fronton. Violation of the provisions of this bill would be a third degree felony. II. ECONOMIC IMPACT AND FISCAL NOTE: A. Public: Tracks and frontons may experience increased attendance if broadcast of out-of-state racing is received. This may lead to a slight increase in handle. B. Government:

REVISED: April 11, 1984 BILL NO. CS/SB 0088 DATE: April 9, 1984 Page _2_ III. COMMENTS: As the wagering on events from other states has not in the past been permitted at pari-mutuel facilities in this state, it is not possible to accurately forecast the impact on wagering. The Department of Business Regulation estimates a minimum of $4,200,000 in handle from wagering on out-of-state events. This would result in approximately $138,600 in increased revenue for the General FU'nd. Technical errors -- none noted. IV. AMENDMENTS:

COMMITTEE ON REGULATED INDUSTRIES & LICENSING CS/HB 246 SPONSOR(S):-=R=ep~._W~a~rd=- RELATING TO: Pari-mutuel Wagering; Simulcasting OTHER COMMITTEES OF REFERENCE:-=N=o~n=e COMPANION/SIMILAR: =S=B~88~ June 12, 1984 I. SUMMARY A. Present Situation Section 550.35, Florida Statutes, prohibits the transmittal of certain information relating to any horseracing or dogracing from any racetrack in this state between certain times. The Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering may, by rule, permit the immediate transmission by radio, television, or press wire of any pertinent racing information concerning not more than two feature races each week with certain exceptions. Gulfstream and Hialeah racetracks are presently simulcasting races to New York for off-track wagering. B. Effect on Present Situation This bill would authorize race tracks and frontons, without obtaining division permission, to transmit broadcasts of races or games out-of-state. Thus, allowing off-track betting in other states on Florida races and games. The bill would also allow any horse track to receive broadcast of horse racing conducted outside the state a,nd to accept pari-mutuel wagering on these races. The money wagered would be subject to state taxes on the same basis as the wagering on the races actually conducted at the Florida tracks. Each dog track and jai-alai fronton may also receive dog races or jai-alai game transmission from out-of-state. These wagers would also be subject to the state tax. At least 80% of the games or races on which wagers are taken during each performance must be live races or games.

Page 2 Staff Report - CS/HB 246 June 12, 1984 Conforms provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act to changes in S. 550.35. II. PRIVATE SECTOR/STATE/LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT A. Private Sector Impact Out-of-state racing broadcasts to Florida facilities will likely increase attendance and handle, and, in turn, track and fronton revenues. Transmission of additional races and games to other states will enhance individual track and fronton revenues. B. State Fiscal Impact The Department of Business Regulation estimates there will be a minimum of 12 horseracing broadcasts into Florida on which will be wagered $350,000 per broadcast to generate $138,600 in additional tax revenue. III. COMMENTS - None IV. AMENDMENTS - One - Effective date changed from October 1, 1984, to upon becoming a law. Prepared by:-=b~i~l=l~r~y~a=n~ Staff Director:-=B~i~l~l~R~y~a=n~

COMMITTEE ON REGULATED INDUSTRIES & LICENSING CS/HB 246 SPONSOR(S):-=R=e=p~.~W=a~r~d~ RELATING TO: Pari-mutuel Wagering; Simulcasting OTHER COMMITTEES OF REFERENCE:~N~o~n~e COMPANION/SIMILAR: =S=B-=8~8 April 6, 1984 I. SUMMARY A. Present Situation Section 550.35, Florida Statutes, prohibits the transmittal of certain information relating to any horseracing or dogracing from any racetrack in this state between certain times. The Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering may, by rule, permit the immediate transmission by radio, television, or press wire of any pertinent racing information concerning not more than two feature races each week 'with certain exceptions. Gulfstream.and Hialeah racetracks are presently simulcasting races to New York for off-track wagering. B. Effect on Present Situation This bill would authorize race tracks and frontons, without obtaining division permission, to transmit broadcasts of races or games out-of-state. Thus, allowing off-track betting in other states on Florida races and games. The bill would also allow any horse track to receive broadcast of horse racing conducted outside the state and to accept pari-mutuel wagering on these races. The money wagered would be subject to state taxes on the same basis as the wagering on the races actually conducted at the Florida tracks. Each dog track and jai-alai fronton may also receive dog races or jai-alai game transmission from out-of-state. These wagers would also be subject to the state tax. At least 80% of the games or races on which wagers are taken during each performance must be live races or games.

Page 2 Staff Report - CS/HB 246 April 6, 1984 Conforms provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act to changes in S. 550.35. II. PRIVATE SECTOR/STATE/LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT A. Private Sector Impact Out-of-state racing broadcasts to Florida facilities will likely increase attendance and handle, and, in turn, track and fronton revenues. Transmission of additional races and games to other states will enhance individual track and fronton revenues. B. State Fiscal Impact The-Department of Business Regulation estimates there will be a minimum of 12 horseracing broadcasts into Florida on which will be wagered $350,000 per broadcast to generate $138,600 in additional tax revenue. III. COMMENTS - None IV. AMENDMENTS - None Prepared by:-=b~i~l~l~r~y~a=n=- Staff Director:-=B~i~l~l~R~y~a~n~

HB 246 COMMITTEE ON REGULATED INDUSTRIES & LICENSING SPONSOR(S):-=R=e=p~._W~a~rd=- RELATING TO: Pari-mutuel Wagering; Simulcasting OTHER COMMITTEES OF REFERENCE: None ~~~---------------------------------- COMPANION/SIMILAR: =S=B_8~8~ March 30, 1984 I. SUMMARY A. Present Situation Section 550.35, Florida Statutes, prohibits the transmittal of certain information relating to any horseracing or dogracing from any racetrack in this state between certain times. The Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering may, by rule, permit the immediate transmission by radio, television, or press wire of any pertinent racing information concerning not more than two feature races each week with certain exceptions. Gulfstream and Hialeah racetracks are presently simulcasting races to New York for off-track wagering. B. Effect on Present Situation This bill would authorize race tracks and frontons, without obtaining division permission, to transmit broadcasts of races or games out-of-state. Thus, allowing off-track betting in other states on Florida races and games. The bill would also allow any horse track to receive broadcast of horse racing conducted outside the state and to accept pari-mutuel wagering on these races. The money wagered would be subject to state taxes on the same basis as the wagering on the races actually conducted at the Florida tracks. Each dog track and jai-alai fronton may also receive dog races or jai-alai game transmission from out-of-state. These wagers would also be subject to the state tax. Dogtracks and frontons would not be allowed to receive the broadcast of horse racing from outside the state. Conforms provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act. to changes in S. 550.35.

Page 2 Staff Report - HB 246 March 30, 1984 II. PRIVATE SECTOR/STATE/LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT A. Private Sector Impact Out-of-state racing broadcasts to Florida facilities will likely increase attendance and handle, and, in turn, track and fronton revenues. Transmission of additional races and games to other states will enhance individual track and fr6nton revenues. B. State Fiscal Impact The Department of Business Regulation estimates there will be a minimum of 12 horseracing broadcasts into Florida on which will be wagered $350,000 per broadcast to generate $138,600 in additional tax revenue. III. COMMENTS - None IV. AMENDMENTS Section 1. is amended with style and grammar changes and to require that at least 80% of the races or games per performance be live rather than broadcast. Prepared by:-=b~i~l~l~r~y~a=n~ Staff Director:-=B~i~l~l~R~y~ a=n=-

-------------------- COMMITTEE ON REGULATED INDUSTRIES & LICENSING HB 246 SPONSOR(S): Rep. Ward --~----------------------------------------~-------------- RELATING TO: Pari-mutuel Wagering; Simulcasting O.THER COMMITTEES OF REFERENCE: None COMPANION/SIMILAR: SB 88 --------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- February 3, 1984 I. SUMMARY A. Present Situation Section 550.35, Florida Statutes, prohibits the transmittal of certain information relating to any horseracing or dogracing from any racetrack in this state between certain times. The Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering may, by rule, permit the immediate transmission by radio, television, or press wire of any pertinent racing information concerning not more than two feature races each week with certain exceptions. Gulfstream and Hialeah racetracks are presently simulcasting races to New York for off-track wagering. B. Effect on Present Situation This bill would authorize race tracks and frontons, without obtaining division permission, to transmit broadcasts of races or games out-of-state. Thus, allowing off-track betting in other states on Florida races and games. The bill would also allow any horse track to receive broadcast of horse racing conducted outside the state and to accept pari-mutuel wagering on these races. The money wagered would be subject to state taxes on the same basis as the wagering on the races actually conducted at the Florida tracks. Each dog track and jai-alai fronton may also receive dog races or jai-alai game transmission from out-of-state. These wagers would also be subject to the state tax. Dogtracks and frontons would not be allowed to receive the broadcast of horse racing from outside the state. Conforms provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act to changes in S. 550.35.

page 2 Staff Report - HB 246 February 3, 1984 II. PRIVATE SECTOR/STATE/LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT A. Private Sector Impact Out-of-state racing broadcasts to Florida facilities will likely increase attendance and handle, and, in turn, track and fronton revenues. Transmission of additional races and games to other states will enhance individual track and fronton revenues. B. State Fiscal Impact The Department of Business Regulation estimates there will be a minimum of 12 horseracing broadcasts into Florida on which will be wagered $350,000 per broadcast to generate $138,600 in additional tax revenue. III. COMMENTS - None IV. AMENDMENTS - None Prepared by:~b_i_l_l R~y~a_n Staff Director:~B~i~l~l~R~y~a~n~