Supplemental Information

Similar documents
Running head: DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 1

How To Win The Ashes A Statistician s Guide

y ) s x x )(y i (x i r = 1 n 1 s y Statistics Lecture 7 Exploring Data , y 2 ,y n (x 1 ),,(x n ),(x 2 ,y 1 How two variables vary together

Package STI. August 19, Index 7. Compute the Standardized Temperature Index

STAT 625: 2000 Olympic Diving Exploration

Navigate to the golf data folder and make it your working directory. Load the data by typing

One-factor ANOVA by example

A Patient s Guide to Lateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow) William T. Grant, MD

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn Supplementary Figure 1. Visual responses of the recorded LPTCs

Class 23: Chapter 14 & Nested ANOVA NOTES: NOTES: NOTES:

PSY201: Chapter 5: The Normal Curve and Standard Scores

Announcements. Lecture 19: Inference for SLR & Transformations. Online quiz 7 - commonly missed questions

Anabela Brandão and Doug S. Butterworth

Weight bearing icd 10

Homeostasis and Negative Feedback Concepts and Breathing Experiments 1

Metocean criteria for fatigue assessment. Rafael V. Schiller 5th COPEDI Seminar, Oct 8th 2014.

4-3 Rate of Change and Slope. Warm Up Lesson Presentation. Lesson Quiz

Using March Madness in the first Linear Algebra course. Steve Hilbert Ithaca College

Working with Marker Maps Tutorial

Lesson 14: Modeling Relationships with a Line

4-3 Rate of Change and Slope. Warm Up. 1. Find the x- and y-intercepts of 2x 5y = 20. Describe the correlation shown by the scatter plot. 2.

Mixture Models & EM. Nicholas Ruozzi University of Texas at Dallas. based on the slides of Vibhav Gogate

Setting up group models Part 1 NITP, 2011

Bilateral leg cramps icd 10

Chapter 20. Planning Accelerated Life Tests. William Q. Meeker and Luis A. Escobar Iowa State University and Louisiana State University

NCSS Statistical Software

save percentages? (Name) (University)

The Effect of Newspaper Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro, and Michael Sinkinson Web Appendix

Besides the reported poor performance of the candidates there were a number of mistakes observed on the assessment tool itself outlined as follows:

Analysis of Variance. Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Sea State Analysis. Topics. Module 7 Sea State Analysis 2/22/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering Orson P. Smith, PE, Ph.D.

GLMM standardisation of the commercial abalone CPUE for Zones A-D over the period

Chapter 13. Factorial ANOVA. Patrick Mair 2015 Psych Factorial ANOVA 0 / 19

Database of Winds and Waves. -internet version-

USING DELTA-GAMMA GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS TO STANDARDIZE CATCH RATES OF YELLOWFIN TUNA CAUGHT BY BRAZILIAN BAIT-BOATS

27Quantify Predictability U10L9. April 13, 2015

Massey Method. Introduction. The Process

Effect of channel slope on flow characteristics of undular hydraulic jumps

Equation 1: F spring = kx. Where F is the force of the spring, k is the spring constant and x is the displacement of the spring. Equation 2: F = mg

Pressured Applied by the Emergency/Israeli Bandage

8th Grade. Data.

Overview. Learning Goals. Prior Knowledge. UWHS Climate Science. Grade Level Time Required Part I 30 minutes Part II 2+ hours Part III

CHAPTER 26 PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT

Understanding How the Appearance of Optical Fiber Splices Relates to Splice Quality

100-Meter Dash Olympic Winning Times: Will Women Be As Fast As Men?

KINEMATIC QUANTIFICATION OF GAIT SYMMETRY BASED ON BILATERAL CYCLOGRAMS

A HYBRID METHOD FOR CALIBRATION OF UNKNOWN PARTIALLY/FULLY CLOSED VALVES IN WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS ABSTRACT

Data Set 7: Bioerosion by Parrotfish Background volume of bites The question:

FMSN60/MASM18 Financial Statistics Lecture 1, Introduction and stylized facts. Magnus Wiktorsson

An Application of Signal Detection Theory for Understanding Driver Behavior at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings

PUV Wave Directional Spectra How PUV Wave Analysis Works

RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY, PHYSICS AND PATHOLOGY IN RELATION TO ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE

Driv e accu racy. Green s in regul ation

Lung Volumes and Capacities

Biostatistics & SAS programming

Age of Fans

Preliminary statistical analysis of. the international eventing. results 2013

An Empirical Comparison of Regression Analysis Strategies with Discrete Ordinal Variables

Compression Study: City, State. City Convention & Visitors Bureau. Prepared for

EXTREME HEAT. Extreme Heat Related Terms. Heat Wave - Prolonged period of excessive heat, often combined with excessive humidity.

Modelling Exposure at Default Without Conversion Factors for Revolving Facilities

A Study of Olympic Winning Times

Time Pressure Dispensing

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM COMPETITION ANALYSIS AT THE 1999 PAN PACIFIC SWIMMING CHAMPIONSHIPS?

Impulse Lab Write Up. K leigh Olsen. 6th hour

Liver cyst unspecified icd 10

Distancei = BrandAi + 2 BrandBi + 3 BrandCi + i

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

Relationship of Road Lane Width to Safety for Urban and Suburban Arterials

Chapter 12 Practice Test

Fluid Flow. Link. Flow» P 1 P 2 Figure 1. Flow Model

Session 2: Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Using SPSS

Table 4.1: Descriptive Statistics for FAAM 26-Item ADL Subscale

Flow and Mixing in the Liquid between Bubbles

Assessment Schedule 2016 Mathematics and Statistics: Demonstrate understanding of chance and data (91037)

SUMMARIZING FROG AND TOAD COUNT DATA

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports. Rush versus Pass: Modeling the NFL

Marathon Performance Prediction of Amateur Runners based on Training Session Data

CHAPTER 1 ORGANIZATION OF DATA SETS

Marine Renewables Industry Association. Marine Renewables Industry: Requirements for Oceanographic Measurements, Data Processing and Modelling

Analysis of Shear Lag in Steel Angle Connectors

7.013 Problem Set

Combined Wave and Wind Fatigue Damage for Offshore Structures

Guide to Computing Minitab commands used in labs (mtbcode.out)

Measuring Returns to Scale in Nineteenth-Century French Industry Technical Appendix

At each type of conflict location, the risk is affected by certain parameters:

INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES. Curriculum 2019 AUDIT TRAIL

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. 1 NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Lung test gas, CO/He AGA 0.28%, 9.3% medicinal gas, compressed

Bioequivalence: Saving money with generic drugs

Explore the basis for including competition traits in the genetic evaluation of the Icelandic horse

Exploring the relationship between Heart Rate (HR) and Ventilation Rate (R) in humans.

BASKETBALL PREDICTION ANALYSIS OF MARCH MADNESS GAMES CHRIS TSENG YIBO WANG

100-Meter Dash Olympic Winning Times: Will Women Be As Fast As Men?

Climatic Parameters Variability & Climate Change in Lebanon

Factorial Analysis of Variance

The pth percentile of a distribution is the value with p percent of the observations less than it.

Newborn Screening for Brain Creatine Deficiency Syndromes

LABORATORY EXERCISE 1 CONTROL VALVE CHARACTERISTICS

Name May 3, 2007 Math Probability and Statistics

U S F O S B u o y a n c y And Hydrodynamic M a s s

Transcription:

Supplemental Information Supplemental Methods Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Every patient (identified by index k varying between 1 and n) was characterized by 4 cell-level measured features (quantitative properties of their primary myotubes, represented by xj, with j varying between 1 and 4). PCA transforms the original data to principal components cj. The cj are found by a linear transformation of the original data to a new set of the same dimension (4 in the present case). The transformation 32 33 is such that transformed data (components) are mutually independent (i.e. not correlated). The comparisons of patients are then made in the transformed space of components. The transformation is standard in terms of linear algebra. Data of patient k was grouped in a row vector k 1k 4k X x x (1) The Xk for all k constitute a 4 n matrix X, x X x x 11 41 x 1n 4n (2) M is the row vector of four feature means 1 4 x j, calculated over all patients M x x (3) Xc (for centered ) represents the matrix obtained by subtracting from every value in X its corresponding mean (equivalently, from every row in Xk the all-patients mean M). C represents the covariance of Xc, calculated as C = Xc T Xc/n, (4) where T represents matrix transposition. This 4 4 matrix has as diagonal elements the variances of the four measured variables. Page 1

The linear transformation used in the analysis is a multiplication of the original data by the diagonalization matrix P, a 4 4 matrix defined by the equation C = P D P -1, (5) where C is the covariance of the data set (Eq. 4) and D is the diagonal version of C, with principal component variances ( eigenvalues ) λj in the diagonal positions and zero elsewhere. The 4 columns of P are the eigenvectors of C. The transformed data are calculated as Z=Xc P (6) Z is a matrix of the same dimensions as the original dataset (i.e., 4 n in the present case); the principal components for patient k are in row k of Z. The 4 eigenvectors the columns of P are listed in text table 2, together with the variances (eigenvalues) of the principal components. Because the principal components are combinations of the original variables, they provide a joint assessment of the condition of an individual. This assessment in turn is used to determine whether the separation of groups is warranted. The principal components of interest are those of greatest variance. For this purpose, the columns of P are permutated and placed in decreasing order of eigenvalue (variance), which yields the matrix P* Then the columns of Z* = Xc P*, (6) Z * c c c 11 41 c 1n 4n which differ from those of Z in placement only, contain the transformed variables placed from left to right in order of decreasing variance. Note that in this technique groups or clusters may or may not be defined, but have no a-priori role in the analysis. Specifically, the CHCT classification (as HS, HH and HN) is irrelevant to the procedure. To summarize, for patient k, the four principal components are the four elements in row k of matrix Z*. Text Figure 5C is a plot of principal component 1 (c11 c1n, first column of Z*) vs. principal Component 2 (second column of Z*). Page 2

Supplemental Tables Median Avg. S.E.M. Range patients p vs HN p vs HS HN 0.00 0.51 0.18 0-8.3 59 < 0.01 HS 3.33 3.33 0.49 0-8.3 22 < 0.01 HH 3.33 3.83 0.47 0-10 40 < 0.01 > 0.69 Table S1. Statistics of the clinical index. The last columns list the probability of the results in the hypothesis of no difference between the HH and the group indicated, calculated from a Mann-Whitney rank sum test of difference of medians. The difference in clinical index between HH and HS groups is far from statistical significance. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I.D. CHCT RYR1 CACNA1S dbsnp rs # MAF, % ClinVar In silico prediction 5 HS G341R none rs121918592 n/a Pathogenic Damaging 28 HS K1393R none rs137933390 0.51 Likely benign Benign 41 HS T2206M none rs118192177 0.003 Pathogenic Damaging 45 HS none G258D rs35534614 0.74 Likely benign Uncertain, likely benign 51 HS none T1354S rs145910245 0.24 Likely benign Benign 68 HS none Y585C n/a n/a n/a Damaging 86 HS E176K none rs761616815 0.002 Uncertain Damaging 88 HS E176K none rs761616815 0.002 Uncertain Damaging 91 HS H2204Q none n/a n/a n/a Damaging 114 HS none S738L n/a n/a n/a Uncertain T1573M rs183195890 0.03 n/a Uncertain 30 HH R1679H none rs146504767 0.15 Uncertain Damaging 50 HH D3159N none n/a n/a n/a Uncertain 84 HH L2695R none n/a n/a n/a Damaging 97 HH V3088M none rs145044872 0.06 Uncertain Damaging 119 HH p.c810g none n/a n/a n/a Damaging 23 HN R1016Q none rs373541911 0.005 Uncertain Damaging 44 HN none T1354S rs145910245 0.24 Likely benign Benign 75 HN Y3540F none rs752477271 0.009 n/a Benign 94 HN V1447M none rs370851779 0.01 Uncertain Damaging 116 HN D4505H none rs150396398 0.61 Likely benign Damaging Table S2. RYR1 and CACNA1S variants found among the study patients, color-coded according to CHCT class. Column 1 lists a unique patient identifier. Column 2 lists patient classification by CHCT result. Columns 3 and 4 identify the gene for which the variant is listed. Cols. 5 and 6 list respectively the IDs and minor allele frequencies (MAF) of the variants, sourced from NCBI s dbsnp database. Cols. 7and 8 list respectively the ClinVar interpretation of clinical significance and the impact of the variant predicted by bioinformatics software tools (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar). The MH-causative RYR1 variants are shown in boldface. None no variants found; n/a data not available. Genetic data to be deposited in dbgap, National Institutes of Health, USA. Page 3

ID # Age / Gender MH History CHCT max. (g) CHCT status Clinical index parameters Caff. Hal. CK Clinical Pathology 1 24 / M Self 0.1 0.5 HN 40 no symptoms type II atrophy, rare fiber degeneration Clinical Index Basal Calcium (nm) Calcium index parameters Spont. act. (%) Waves after stimulation (%) Spiking after stimulation (%) Ca Index 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 43 / F No 0.1 0.5 HN 20 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3 20 / M FH 0 1.1 HH 47 fiber size 4 34 / F FH 0 0.3 HN 16 no symptoms Type II fiber atrophy 0 100 0 10.5 0 1.67 5 41 / F FH 4.2 10 HS 121 no symptoms negative 0 81 0 22.7 13.6 2.5 6 38 / F FH 0 0.6 HN 91 no symptoms Mild atrophy 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 45 / M FH 0.1 1 HH 21 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8 30 / F FH 0.3 2.1 HS 81 no symptoms 9 70 / M FH 0.1 0.6 HN 200 no symptoms, fiber with focal splitting, and internal nuclei neurogenic 10 40 / F FH 0.4 1.5 HS 82 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11 33 / F No 0 0.7 HH 64 severe muscle N/A 1.67 N/A 0 0 26.3 N/A 12 39 / F No 0 0.3 HN 39 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 56 / M FH 0 1.9 HH 350 muscle pain negative 3.33 N/A 11.1 22.2 40.7 N/A 14 34 / F No 0 0.6 HN 175 heat stroke x1 negative 1.67 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 15 19 / M FH 0 0.6 HN 9 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 16 49 / M FH 0 0.2 HN 100 muscle negative 17 26 / M Self 0 0.5 HN 77 no symptoms 18 31 / M FH 0.1 1.1 HH 168 no symptoms, 19 53 / F No 0.1 1.8 HH 210 muscle weakness, heat intolerance, fibromyalgia 20 29 / F Self 0.2 1.7 HH 40 no symptoms 21 26 / F FH 0.2 2.4 HH 387 heat sensitivity minor non-specific abnormalities, scattered atrophic fibers and focal small aggregates largely unremarkable muscle with scattered small fibers moderate in fiber size with some fibrosis non-specific mild myopathic mild myopathic 6.67 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 4

22 33 / M Self 0.5 2.6 HS 490 muscle 23 27 / M FH 0 0.3 HN 31 24 26 / M No 0.2 2.1 HH 360 severe muscle muscle cramp, exertional 25 30 / M FH 0 0.7 HH 48 no symptoms largely unremarkable skeletal muscle, mild fibrosis moderate capillary vascular thickening 3.33 110 87.5 0 62 6.7 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A negative 6.67 99 26.7 15.3 30.7 5.8 occasional split fibers 26 28/ M FH 0 0.9 HH 34 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27 19 / F No 0.1 1.4 HH 540 28 19 / M FH 1.4 7.2 HS 23 muscle weakness and heat sensitivity severe muscle 29 47/ F FH 0 0.6 HN 52 no symptoms 30 57 / F FH 0.1 2.2 HH 730 31 27 / M FH 0.2 3.3 HH 320 severe weakness and pain muscle cramp and heat sensitivity unremarkable skeletal muscle mild non-specific focal fibrotic in fiber size with focally grouped atrophic fibers- very mild (early) type 2 fiber atrophy 5 106 0 8.3 16.7 4.2 3.33 85 17.6 9.1 1.2 2.5 0 87 0 0 0 0 8.33 122 14.3 0 30 5.0 8.33 108 40 0 30 5.8 32 67 / F FH 0.2 1 HH 99 muscle cramp negative 33 29 / M FH 0.1 0.8 HN 183 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 34 20 / F No 0.1 1.5 HH 420 35 64 / M FH 0.1 3.1 HH 850 36 38 / F FH 0 1.6 HH 340 37 32 / F No 0 0.6 HN 453 38 47 / F FH 0.2 1.6 HH 591 heat intolerance, muscle muscle, heat sensitivity multiple heat strokes, muscle Muscle spasm, heat-induced, exercise intolerance no symptoms, family history of MH death 39 56 / F FH 0 0.6 HN 37 no symptoms 40 21 / M No 0.2 1.3 HH 2330 41 55 / M Self 3.8 10 HS 58 Severe, exercise-induced severe muscle negative 5 112 42.9 0 42.8 6.7 negative 5 141 10 0 60 5.8 large in fiber size 8.33 120 16.7 16.7 16.7 6.7 type-ii atrophy 8.33 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A mild nonspecific myopathic, focal fibers splitting and occasional internal nuclei in some fibers mild non-specific type II atrophy, mild myopathic 3.33 144 100 0 50 7.5 1.67 108 7.1 0 7.1 0.83 10.00 128 100 0 25 6.7 negative 3.33 99 0 0 14.3 1.7 42 34 / F FH 0 0.6 HN 122 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 43 44 / F Self 0 1.8 HH 79 muscle moderate fiber size 5 128 N/A N/A N/A N/A 44 40 / M FH 0.1 0.5 HN 115 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 45 50 / F No 0.6 2.5 HS 719 muscle negative 3.33 105 0 7.7 23.1 3.3 46 66 / M FH 0 0.7 HH 100 no symptoms negative 0 80 50 0 20 4.2 Page 5

47 37 / F FH 0.2 0.3 HN 101 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 48 35 / M FH 0.1 1.2 HH 29 no symptoms N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 49 22 / F FH 0 0.6 HN 25 no symptoms negative 0 103 0 0 0 0.83 50 35 / F Self 0.1 0.8 HH 409 muscle Negative 51 38 / F FH 0.5 1.8 HS 121 no symptoms moderate fiber size, and 1.67 95 0 0 0 0.8 type I hypertrophy 52 29 / M FH 0.1 0.6 HN 195 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 53 35 / M FH 0.3 1.8 HS 840 heat intolerance fiber size, type II dominance, and increase in collagen 5 84 33.3 33.3 16.7 5 54 42 / F FH 0 0.6 HN 67 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 55 18 / F No 0.1 0.3 HN 101 no symptoms negative 0 110 0 0 0 1.7 56 26 / M Self 2.2 4 HS 311 muscle spasm and negative 3.33 105 11.7 0 30 4.2 57 25 / F No 0.1 2.1 HH 110 no symptoms mild endomysial fibrosis and fiber size 1.67 126 0 0 0 2.5 58 34 / F FH 0 0.4 HN 20 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 59 38/ F FH 0 1.8 HH 220 muscle moderate in fiber 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A size 60 27/ M Self 0.3 1.8 HS 94 no symptoms negative 0 119 0 0 28.6 3.3 61 47 / M FH 0 0 HN 33 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 62 33 / F FH 0.2 1.2 HH 212 no symptoms 1.67 200 44.4 11.1 66.7 8.3 63 64 / M FH 0 1.1 HH 102 no symptoms inflammatory myopathy 64 22 / F FH 0 2.5 HH 410 no symptoms negative 65 34 / F FH 0.3 2 HS 45 no symptoms slight in fiber size 66 58 / F FH 0 0 HN 55 no symptoms Page 6 1.67 112 0 0 0 2.5 67 46 / F FH 0.7 1 HS 342 no symptoms mild fiber degeneration and regeneration, mild 3.33 114 0 0 18.2 3.3 fibrosis 68 41 / F No 0.3 1.1 HS 421 no symptoms moderate in fiber size and focal type 3.33 111 0 7.1 14.3 3.3 2 fiber atrophy 69 32 / M No 0 0.6 HN 200 muscle scattered atrophic fibers 70 24 / F No 0 1.8 HH 94 no symptoms negative 0.00 151 N/A N/A N/A N/A 71 36 / M FH 0 0 HN 66 no symptoms, had heat stroke negative 72 47 / F FH 0.2 0.6 HN 119 no symptoms mild type II fiber predominance 73 17 / F FH 0 0.4 HN 141 heat sensitivity negative 74 19 / F FH 0 0.2 HN 80 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 75 38 / M FH 0 0.6 HN 111 no symptoms negative 0 75 11.2 0 0 0 76 39 / M FH 0 0 HN 185 no symptoms negative 0 94 0 0 6.7 0.8 77 38 / M Self 0.3 0.8 HS 206 muscle not adequate for diagnosis 1.67 100 0 0 0 0.8 78 42 / F FH 0.3 1.4 HS 100 no symptoms mild in fiber size, endomysial 1.67 85 N/A N/A N/A N/A fibrosis 79 44 / F FH 0.1 0.4 HN 96 no symptoms negative 0 105 0 0 0 0.8 80 38 / M FH 0 0.6 HN 84 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 81 33 / F FH 0 0.3 HN 35 no symptoms negative 0 85 N/A N/A N/A N/A 82 37 / M FH 0.3 1.1 HS 332 no symptoms increased fiber size,

83 35 / F Self 0.1 1.5 HH 696 84 27 / M FH 0.1 1.8 HH 1774 severe muscle pain and twitch after anesthesia; heat and exertional induced twitches exertional increased central nuclei polygonal atrophic muscle fibers moderate interstitial fibrosis and mild in fiber size 10.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.00 94 N/A N/A N/A N/A 85 42 / F FH 0 0 HN 332 no symptoms negative 0 120 0 0 0 1.7 86 24 / M No 0.6 2.2 HS 1848 exercise-induced negative 6.67 154 0 0 26.1 4.2 87 35 / M FH 0.1 0.3 HN 171 no symptoms negative 0 89 N/A N/A N/A N/A 88 23 / M No 2 10.6 HS 921 severe myopathy triggered by viral infection 6.67 173 0 0 14.3 3.3 89 44 / F FH 0 0.5 HN 100 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 90 27 / F FH 0.1 0.5 HN 414 91 33 / M Self 3.4 6.6 HS 120 no symptoms, MH death in the family muscle weakness and negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 129 0 6.7 13.3 4.2 92 40 / F FH 0.2 0.6 HN 92 no symptoms negative 0 97 0 0 20 2.5 93 40 / F FH 0 0 HN 38 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 94 43 / M FH 0 0 HN 69 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 95 41 / F Self 0.1 0.8 HH 354 heat sensitive mild myopathic with mild fibrosis 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 96 4 1/ M FH 0 0.6 HN N/A no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 97 37 / M Self 0.2 3.7 HH 149 no symptoms mild in fiber size 98 39 / M FH 0 0.2 HN N/A no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 99 36 / M FH 0 0.6 HN 39 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 100 39 / F FH 0 0.4 HN N/A no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 101 52 / M FH 0.2 1.2 HH 104 no symptoms fiber size 1.67 190 0 14.3 0 3.3 102 43 / M FH 0 0 HN N/A no symptoms negative 0 110 0 0 7.7 2.5 103 35 / F FH 0 0 HN N/A no symptoms negative 0 118 0 0 0 1.7 104 36 / F FH 0 0 HN N/A no symptoms negative 0 104 N/A N/A N/A N/A 105 29 / M No 0 0.3 HN N/A no symptoms negative 0 111 N/A N/A N/A N/A 106 52 / F FH 0 0 HN N/A no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 107 29 / F FH 0 0.5 HN N/A no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 108 20 / M FH 0 1.5 HH 300 no symptoms negative 0 171 12.5 0 18.2 5 109 52 / F FH 0 0.2 HN N/A no symptoms negative 0 106 N/A N/A N/A N/A 110 21 / F No 0 0.4 HN 33 no symptoms negative 0 95 N/A N/A N/A N/A 111 39 / F No 0 0.1 HN 256 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 112 21 / F FH 1.2 2.5 HS 621 heat sensitive increased internal nuclei 6.67 114 0 0 20 3.3 113 47 / F Self 0 0 HN 84 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 114 30 / M Self 1 4 HS 602 exertional type 2 atrophy, increased internal nuclei 8.33 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 7

115 36 / M FH 0.1 1.5 HH 53 family history of MH related death severe type 2 atrophy 116 39 / F FH 0 0 HN 44 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 117 39 / F FH 0 0 HN 61 No symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 118 31 / M FH 0 0 HN 32 no symptoms negative 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 119 41 / M FH 0 1.5 HH 712 sensitivity to heat, and negative 5 139 50 0 62.5 7.5 120 39 / M Self 0 2.3 HH 295 exertional severe Type 2 atrophy 6.67 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 121 32 / M FH 0 2.7 HH 561 muscle negative 5 117 37.5 0 25 5.83 Table S3. Summary of patient clinical and cell-level data. Caff: contracture with 2mM caffeine; Hal: contracture to 3% halothane; FH: family history of MH; Self: own history of adverse anesthetic reaction. N/A: not available. Clinical index calculation is based on: weakness and myopathy (0-2: none, mild, severe), pain and (0-2: none, mild, severe interfering with daily activity), heat and exercise sensitivity (0-2: none, mild, ), hyperck (0-2: <300, 300-1500, >1500), histopathology (0-2: normal, mild, severe ). For example patient #36 has score of: 0 (no myopathy) +1 ()+ 1 (heat strokes) + CK:340 (1) +severe histopathology (2)=5. Once rescaled to range of 1-10 it becomes 8.33. Page 8