To consider the introduction of a revised UEA timetable slotting matrix for use commencing in 2019/20.

Similar documents
An Overview: 5000 MW Ultramega Solar Park at Dholera. For the positive response to Expression of Interest (EoI)

windpro WP A15-Lingewaard WTGs Shadow receptor-input

London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games. 14 June 2010

Safety When Using Liquid Coatings

Faculty of Business and Economics Change Proposal. Formal consultation paper for faculty staff located at the Berwick Campus

Out of Hours Working Policy

UWH Coaching Scheme Directive

in accordance to the European Qualification Framework (EQF)

Recommended Alternatives

Diving Operations Procedure

1.0 PURPOSE 2.0 REFERENCES

Geometric Style Die Head Chasers

Health and Safety Inspection Procedure

Cycle traffic and the Strategic Road Network. Sandra Brown, Team Leader, Safer Roads- Design

Quest 2016 Splus 28 Swim England Learn to Swim Accreditation

NATIONAL / LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME INFORMATION

Safety Monitor Requirements. September 2012

Hopkins Architects. University of Nottingham. University Park Campus Masterplan Strategy. 13 th February 2009

Course Name: BOSIET Basic Offshore Safety Induction & Emergency Training OPITO Code 5700

Discussion Paper Men s and Boy s Competition Review 26 May 2017

Oxfordshire Hockey Umpires Association

GCE Physical Education Exemplar Materials

Scottish Rugby Club Youth Rugby

Calendar of Future Board and Committee Meetings Agenda Item 12

Premium Report 27/07/2017

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION Water Forum Terms of reference: September 2016

Coaching Programme Overview

Academic Policy Proposal: Policy on Course Scheduling for the Charles River Campus ( )

Exposure estimations before and after the new EFSA-Guidance ECPA s perspective based on examples

SCRUTINY PANEL EXTERNAL PROVIDER QUALITY ASSURANCE

IMPACT & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT SUMMARY SECTION (For AEMO to complete and administer)

CAMBOURNE TO CAMBRIDGE BETTER PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROJECT PHASE 2 PUBLIC CONSULTATION MADINGLEY MULCH ROUNDABOUT TO CAMBOURNE

Shropshire Cricket Board Cricket Policy

Umpires. Coach Professional. Development Program

Job Description World Under-24 Ultimate Championships Tournament Director

SCOTTISH BORDERS WALKING FESTIVAL 2018 TO 2020

C. Mokkapati 1 A PRACTICAL RISK AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR SAFETY- CRITICAL SYSTEMS

additional and sustainable

Annex 1 to Decision 2009/007/R

BCU Awarding Body. Level 2 Certificate in Coaching Paddlesport. Pre- Course Information

World Para Swimming Technical Officials Pathway. Participant profiles and learning outcomes. 16 November 2017 (V02)

ITU PARATRIATHLON Fair Start System

Resource Sharing Protocol

Appendix B27 - Weekend and off-peak benefits

ENFIELD TOWN THE REVISED DESIGN

Safety Monitor Requirements Revised. February 2018

Purpose. Scope. Process flow OPERATING PROCEDURE 07: HAZARD LOG MANAGEMENT

Level 2 Diplomas in Smart Metering ( )

Competition System Competition Committee November 2013

A1307 Haverhill to Cambridge: Approval to consult on transport improvement concepts

Olympic Agenda Recommendation 28. Support autonomy

Appendix A. Road Classification Review of Outstanding Issues and Proposed Classifications (All Wards) Staff Report Road Classification System

ANNEX1 The investment required to achieve the Government s ambition to double cycling activity by 2025

a CYCLING ACTION PROGRESS MEETING

MINE SAFETY TARGETED ASSESSMENT PROGRAM. Ground or strata failure NSW metalliferous mines. April

LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY. Transport Strategy

Woodside Sports Premium 2018/19

Junior Competitions Framework Proposed Club Competition Format Paper March 2011

SEASONAL POOLS REVIEW AND STRATEGY

MFF and the CAP Legislative financial statement

Intersection Control Evaluation Report Project: Alternative: Location: Evaluator:

Session 3 - Dressage Future

GD 0043/18 ACTIVE TRAVEL STRATEGY

VOLLEYBALL PROGRAM GUIDE

The programme is open to all National Olympic Committees (NOCs). However, priority will be given to the NOCs with the greatest needs.

Introduction QUADRENNIAL PLAN

CONTENTS PREFACE 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE 2.0 POLICY AND GOVERNANCE 3.0 SUMMARY OF PROGRESS 4.0 NATURE OF DEMAND 5.0 TRAVEL AND PARKING INITIATIVES

To comply with the OHS Act, the responsible manager must carry out and document the following:

Report Subject: Netball participation and social class

National Unit Specification: General Information

BASKETBALL UKCC COACH EDUCATION PROGRAMME LEVEL 1 COACH AWARD. Course Content and Information for interested coaches

TERMS OF REFERENCE. 1. Background

STRUCTURE OF THE IIHF

Technical note. 1. Introduction

Course Title: Agile Scrum Team Simulation Workshop

CASUAL SWIMMING INSTRUCTOR POSITION DESCRIPTION

Competition Grading Guidelines

MILTON ROAD ~ MITCHAM'S CORNER PARAMICS MODEL INITIAL OPTION TESTING

Generic Safe Method for placing TTM on MM-ALR

PROGRAM INFORMATION ENTRY REQUIREMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Annual Unit Extended Team Championships. Sanctioning and Reporting Guide. January, 2017

The Spoke: Extended Hours & Mobile Shop. Project Proposal

Meter Data Distribution Market Trials

Membership. Designed by

STA Level 2 Award in Aquatic Teaching - People with Disabilities

Williamstown Football Club

Climbing Wall Instructor (CWI) Overview

Appendix N(b): Portishead Station Outline Travel Plan

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

ASX Genium Clearing Industry Wide Testing Briefing Pack

Professional Golfers Association of Australia Limited

Health & Safety Policy HSP 08 Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Version Status Date Title of Reviewer Purpose/Outcome

A Rapid Health Impact Assessment of the Green Travel Plan for the Eastern Health and Social Services Board May 2006

Final Plan 20 December 2016

Making the case for active travel

Horsham Indoor Bowls Club A Guide For New Members

APPENDIX 2 PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FOR POOLE (DOLPHIN) LEISURE CENTRE FINAL SPECIFICATION

DOCKYARD PORT OF PLYMOUTH HARBOUR SAFETY PLAN. Issue 2 Jun 13

Expedition Set up User Guide

Guidelines for Hosting World Para Alpine Skiing International Classification

Transcription:

LTC17D17 Title: UEA Timetable Slotting Author: Nigel Shed LTS Manager Timetabling Date: 10//2018 Circulation: Learning and Teaching Committee 20 th June 2018 Agenda: LTC17A006 Version: Final Status: Open Issue This document provides an overview of the current slotting system and some of the current issues that make constructing and maintaining a timetable problematic. This is followed by a proposal for a revised slotting matrix that is designed to give the greatest number of clash free slots as possible and make it easier to identify available slots into which teaching events can be rescheduled. Recommendation To consider the introduction of a revised UEA timetable slotting matrix for use commencing in 2019/20. Resource Implications There are no capital or recurrent resource implications which would arise if the proposals are approved Risk Implications The risk in continuing with the current slotting matrix is that the timetabling function at UEA may not be able to facilitate the wide range of module combinations currently offered. Student satisfaction is also significantly affected by the timetable itself, changes made to it during the year and the communication of those changes and in being taught in an appropriate room for the teaching event. These risks will be partly mitigated by the new slotting matrix. Equality and Diversity There are no Equality and Diversity issues associated with the timetable matrix itself. Timing of decisions Following approval at LTC, the recommendation is that the revised slotting matrix be introduced for the academic year 2019/20. Further Information For further information please contact Nigel Shed, LTS Timetabling Manager (n.shed@uea.ac.uk, 01603 9 2388). 1 1

Background Following the transfer of the Room Booking Office to LTS, the PVC Academic requested a review of the slotting system at UEA with the aim to review the current slotting matrix and to propose a revision to the matrix, if required. Any revision should ensure that student module choice is maintained, particularly for cross Faculty programmes, and that the timetabling function as a whole is made more transparent and user-friendly. The pressure on teaching rooms is significant and so a matrix is required which ensures teaching is spread out across the working week in order to meet the demand for rooms. Discussion What is the slotting system? The slotting system is a matrix of timetable slots that were originally developed to assist in timetable planning. The teaching week is broken down into segments of time into which modules are scheduled so that a clash free timetable could be constructed. In the current slotting model; there are five major top level slots (identified by the letters A-E) which includes 10 hours during the day and two hours in the evening. modules are assigned a slot to ensure that particular modules do not clash in the course profile. modules are allocated to the A-E slots, timetables can be planned in the knowledge that they will not clash. timetable slots indicate the range of times within a module that teaching may take place. sub slots can be used to provide a sub-set of times within which teaching will take place. i.e two (or more) modules could be taught in the same top level slot but remain clash free. resource slots are times across the day that aid more effective use of space (e.g. 09:00-11:00, 11:00-13:00, 13:00-1:00, 1:00-17:00 & 17:00-19:00). There was a revision to the slotting system in October 2009 which introduced the concept of five resource slots with the aim to improve space usage particularly during those hours at the start and end of the teaching day. Since the introduction of resource slots there has been no University requirement to use timetable slots. Please see Appendix 1 - Timetable Slotting system, basic scheme for further detail on timetable slots and resource slots. It should be noted that due to external requirements of professional bodies, the Faculty of Medicine and Health do not utilise the slotting matrix and have therefore been excluded from any analysis or consideration in respect of the following proposal. Current Practice Following guidance produced by the Timetable Working Group in October 2009, there was no longer a requirement for modules to make use of timetable slots (although they must observe resource slots). As a result, there is very mixed practice across the University in respect of alignment of modules to slots codes and, where feasible, utilising resource slots effectively. It is accepted that three hour (or greater) teaching sessions will cut across the preferred two-hour duration for resource slots. Use of Sub-Slots is problematic as various sub-slot hour patterns cut across each other. This can easily result in clashing slots for modules. Staff tasked with rescheduling teaching events where a clash is found, find it difficult to easily identify specific available hours when each sub-slot is identified as a three-letter code and when each unique sub-slot may also have overlapping hours identified between each. 2 2

Rescheduling is further complicated by the mixed practice that is currently seen across the University. Rather than scheduling to top level slots or their sub slot derivatives, some modules are scheduled to specific hour slots (or multiple contiguous hour slots) that can cut across a range of different slot codes. This again creates issues for LTS teams and Module Organisers when trying to resolve timetable clashes as detailed analysis is required to find slots that are not currently in use by other modules that are common to a programme. Such mixed practice can also lead to difficulty for Course Directors when trying to construct academically coherent cross-school programmes. Analysis of Contact Hours A key aspect in consideration of a revision to the matrix was to develop a matrix that enabled as many clash free options as possible but whilst still being clear and understandable, and negated the need to resort to sub slot tables or derivatives as per the current matrix for post-timetabling changes/rescheduling. Following an analysis of the contact hours per student for each module (for LEC/SEM/LAB etc.), it was clear that a majority of modules, 92%, have hours or less core contact time. Table 1: Student Contact Hours Analysis Module Contact Hr Combinations HUM SCI SSF Grand Total 2.77% 6.88% 12.2% 2.89% 1 2.3% 1.88% 7.37% 2.78% 3 7.2%.20% 2.72% 1.17% 1 + 1 1.1% 3.6% 2.60% 7.66% 1 + 2.13% 1.7% 0.7% 6.62% 2 + 2 0.37% 0.71% 2.7% 3.83% 1 + 1 + 1 1.26% 1.60% 0.1% 3.01% 1 + 1 + 2 1.26% 0.89% 0.1% 2.31% 2 + 3 0.67% 0.30% 0.30% 1.26% 0.07% 0.1% 0.71% 1.19% 1 + 3 0.1% 0.63% 0.11% 1.1% 1 + 1 + 3 0.0% 1.08% 0.00% 1.12% Whilst additional activity groups (SEM, WKSHP, TUT etc.) are run to cater for larger student cohorts, these additional activity groups are usually classified as Unslotted and scheduled across the week. Scheduling across the week is done on the basis that the student scheduling algorithm will ensure that students are still able to attend all compulsory activities as well as one of the supporting activity groups during the week. Appendix 2 gives additional background data on Average Student Contact hours per week. Teaching Hours An analysis of teaching times indicates that very little teaching takes place after 18:00 with only 1.39% of the overall teaching commitment scheduled to start at 18:00 or later. Teaching that does occur after 18:00 is usually for language support classes or film screening activities. 3 3

Revised matrix The proposed revision of the slotting matrix (Appendix 3) is predicated on the premise that it should enable the greatest number of clash free module slot combinations whilst at the same time facilitating easier post scheduling activities. The matrix is designed to be read at the top level rather than via the use of sub slots tables. In light of the core student contact time analysis, and that the current matrix has effectively x 10 hour top level slots within which to run core activities, this proposal increases the number of top level slots whilst reducing the number of hours per top level slot. The revised matrix has eight top level slots, each with hours of contact time. These hours are broken down into shorter segments of time spread across the week so that, if required for pedagogic purposes, activities can be separated to allow for reading time etc. Each of these splits is annotated with a numerical value to denote each part of the slot. Evening slots have lower utilisation and as such start at 18:00. They have been given an I code and give the potential for teaching to continue into the evening utilising this Ix slot coding. This additional slot gives increased options for scheduling teaching at the end of the day if preferred. As an example of the revised coding structure; the top level slot of A is split into three; A1 (2hrs), A2 (2hrs) and A3 (1hr). It is possible for a module to utilise all hours or just one or two of the slot parts. If all hours are used then the slot coding would be annotated as A, if only two of the slot parts are utilised this would be coded, for example as A1/A3. This would leave A2 for use by another module. Some modules may require a wider range of slots and could therefore cross over between two top level codes (e.g. SCI Lab based modules). Where this is the case then this can be accommodated by coding appropriately (e.g. A/F2). If all modules are coded appropriately then use of a single matrix pattern, rather than sub slot tables, should enable clashes to be resolved more quickly. Resolution will still require knowledge of which modules are compulsory and optional, but a single matrix approach is more user friendly. The current pattern of resource slots is continued so that effective use of space is maintained. Wherever possible modules should be allocated within a single top level slot code. Where the proposed top level slot cuts across the resource slot start times (Wed (AM) & Fri (PM)), teaching events should be scheduled to be contained within the 2 hour resource slot window. Implementation In order to implement the revision to the slotting matrix for the 2019/20 year we will introduce as additional SITS UDF field for use in the Course and Module Update process which takes place in the summer and autumn of 2018. This new field will be utilised to hold the new slot. The update to the slot code will be an administrative task that LTS will undertake. The new slot will be expressed on the basis of the 2018/9 timetable requirements for core elements of a module, with the expectation that modules are realigned so as to limit cross over between top level slots. LTS colleagues will work with academic colleagues to work through the revised coding structure with the aim of reducing the occurrences where a module is taught across multiple top level slot codes. The new slot coding will come into effect for teaching in 2019/20. Recommendation LTC are requested to approve the introduction of a revised slotting matrix for the academic year 2019/20 Attachments LTC Timetable Slotting Appendix 1 Timetable Slotting system, basic scheme LTC Timetable Slotting Appendix 2 Module count of average student contact hrs per week LTC Timetable Slotting Appendix 3 Timetable Slotting Matrix 2018 Revision

Appendix 1 CURRENT TIMETABLE SLOTTING SYSTEM: BASIC SCHEME 1 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday B1 C1 D1 E1 A1 0900 B2 C2 D2 E2 A2 1000 2 B3 C3 A3 E3 D3 1100 E D B A C 1200 3 C D E A B 1310 C6 D6 E6 A6 B6 110 C7 D7 E7 A7 B7 110 C8 D8 E8 A8 B8 1610 A9 B9 C9 D9 E9 1710 A10 B10 C10 D10 E10 1810 EY AY BY CY DY 1910 LTC Timetable Slotting - Appendix 1.docx 1--18 Page 1 of

Timetable Slotting and Room Booking Chart SLOT AA AND ITS DERIVATIVES Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Total Hours AA 1700-1900 1900-2100 1100-1200 1200-1300, 1300-100, 100-1700 AG 1800-1900 1200-1300, 1300-100, 0900-1100 12 AJ 1100-1200 1300-100 3 AK 1100-1200 100-1700 3 AL 1700-1800 0900-1100 3 AQQ 100-1700 3 AP 1700-1900 1100-1200 1200-1300, 1300-100 AQ 100-1700 0900-1100 AJL 1700-1800 1100-1200 1300-100 0900-1100 6 AKL 1700-1800 1100-1200 100-1700 0900-1100 6 AGL 1700-1900 1200-1300, 1300-100, AGJ 1800-1900 1100-1200 1200-1300, 1300-100, 100-1700 AR 1800-1900 1200-1300, 100-100 AS 1700-1800 1100-1200 1300-100, 100-1700 0900-1100 7 7 0900-1100 LTC Timetable Slotting - Appendix 1.docx 1--18 Page 2 of 6

SLOT BB AND ITS DERIVATIVES Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Total Hours BB 0900-1200 1700-1900 1200-1300, 1900-2100 1300-100, 100-1700 12 BG 1700-1800 1300-100 3 BH 1700-1800 100-1700 3 BJ 1100-1200 1200-1300 3 BL 0900-1100 1800-1900 1300-100 BQQ 100-1700 3 BP 0900-1000 1700-1900 1200-1300 1300-100 BQ 0900-1100 100-1700 BJL 0900-1200 1800-1900 1200-1300 1300-100, BGL 0900-1100 1700-1900 1300-100, 100-1700 7 7 BGJ 1100-1200 1700-1800 1200-1300 100-1700 6 BR 0900-1100 1800-1900 1200-1300 100-100 BS 1100-1200 1700-1800 1300-100, 100-1700 SLOT CC AND ITS DERIVATIVES Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Total Hours CC 1300-100, 100-1700 0900-1200 1700-1900 1900-2100 1200-1300 12 CG 1300-100 1700-1800 3 CH 100-1700 1700-1800 3 CJ 1100-1200 1200-1300 3 CL 1300-100 0900-1100 1800-1900 CQQ 100-1700 3 CP 1300-100 0900-1000 1700-1900 1200-1300 CQ 100-1700 0900-1100 CJL 1300-100, CGL 1300-100, 100-1700 0900-1200 1800-1900 1200-1300 7 0900-1100 1700-1900 7 CGJ 100-1700 1100-1200 1700-1800 1200-1300 6 CR 100-100 0900-1100 1800-1900 1200-1300 CS 1300-100, 100-1700 1100-1200 1700-1800 LTC Timetable Slotting - Appendix 1.docx 1--18 Page 3 of 7

SLOT DD AND ITS DERIVATIVES Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Total Hours DD 1200-1300, 1300-100, 100-1700 0900-1100 1700-1900 0900-1000, 1900-2100 12 DG 1200-1300, 1300-100, 1800-1900 DJ 1300-100 0900-1000 3 DK 100-1700 0900-1000 3 DL 0900-1100 1700-1800 3 DQQ 100-1700 3 DP 1200-1300, 1300-100 1700-1900 0900-1000 DQ 100-1700 0900-1100 DJL 1300-100 0900-1100 1700-1800 0900-1000 6 DKL 100-1700 0900-1100 1700-1800 0900-1000 6 DGL 1200-1300, 1300-100, DGJ 1200-1300, 1300-100, 100-1700 DR 1200-1300, 100-100 DS 1300-100, 100-1700 0900-1100 1700-1900 7 1800-1900 0900-1000 7 0900-1100 1800-1900 1700-1800 0900-1000 SLOT EE AND ITS DERIVATIVES Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Total Hours EE 1200-1300, 1900-2100 1300-100, 100-1700 0900-1200 1700-1900 12 EUG 1200-1300, 0900-1100, 1100-1200 LTC Timetable Slotting - Appendix 1.docx 1--18 Page of 8

Appendix 2: Module count per Faculty of average contact hours per week Mod Credit (Multiple Items) Count of Median band Faculty Median band Total HUM 1 17 2 129 3 27 16 6 1 7 3 8 2 9 2 10 1 >12 HUM Total 17 SCI 1 9 2 2 3 76 66 76 6 16 7 1 8 10 9 11 1 SCI Total 316 SSF 1 30 2 10 3 101 110 19 6 8 7 12 8 3 9 1 10 2 >12 1 SSF Total 1 Grand Total 127 Mod Credit Count of Median band Module Contact Hours Summary 300 20 200 10 100 0 0 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 >12 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 11 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 >12 HUM SCI SSF Faculty Median band Total Module Slot Type Analysis.xlsx 9

Appendix 3 TIMETABLE SLOTTING SYSTEM: 2018 REVISION 1 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday A1 F2 G2 E1 C2 0900 A1 F2 G2 E1 C2 1000 2 F1 A2 G2 H3 D3 1100 F1 A2 B2 H3 D3 1200 3 B1 G1 I3 C1 E2 1310 B1 G1 I3 C1 E2 110 D1 H2 I3 B3 E2 110 D1 H2 I3 B3 C3 1610 H1 D2 I3 F3 A3 1710 I1 I2 I3 I I 1810 10