Experimental Design and Data Analysis Part 2

Similar documents
Analysis of Variance. Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

MGB 203B Homework # LSD = 1 1

Unit 4: Inference for numerical variables Lecture 3: ANOVA

One-factor ANOVA by example

Week 7 One-way ANOVA

A few things to remember about ANOVA

PLANNED ORTHOGONAL CONTRASTS

Introduction to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) The Structural Model, The Summary Table, and the One- Way ANOVA

Biostatistics & SAS programming

Factorial ANOVA Problems

One Way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance)

ANOVA - Implementation.

Legendre et al Appendices and Supplements, p. 1

Factorial Analysis of Variance

Stats 2002: Probabilities for Wins and Losses of Online Gambling

Select Boxplot -> Multiple Y's (simple) and select all variable names.

Empirical Example II of Chapter 7

Class 23: Chapter 14 & Nested ANOVA NOTES: NOTES: NOTES:

Hypothesis tests for comparing two propor3ons and two means

WATER OIL RELATIVE PERMEABILITY COMPARATIVE STUDY: STEADY VERSUS UNSTEADY STATE

Guide to Computing Minitab commands used in labs (mtbcode.out)

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHYSICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ATHLETES OF SELECTED EVENTS IN TRACK AND FIELD

Comparison of recruitment tile materials for monitoring coralline algae responses to a changing climate

Denise L Seman City of Youngstown

BIOL 101L: Principles of Biology Laboratory

DOCUMENT RESUME. A Comparison of Type I Error Rates of Alpha-Max with Established Multiple Comparison Procedures. PUB DATE NOTE

Statistical Analysis of PGA Tour Skill Rankings USGA Research and Test Center June 1, 2007

Understanding probability using games

Chapter 13. Factorial ANOVA. Patrick Mair 2015 Psych Factorial ANOVA 0 / 19

Unit4: Inferencefornumericaldata 4. ANOVA. Sta Spring Duke University, Department of Statistical Science

IDENTIFYING SUBJECTIVE VALUE IN WOMEN S COLLEGE GOLF RECRUITING REGARDLESS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC CLASS. Victoria Allred

Design of Experiments Example: A Two-Way Split-Plot Experiment

One-way ANOVA: round, narrow, wide

Persistence racial difference in socioeconomic outcomes. Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal?

Example 1: One Way ANOVA in MINITAB

Driv e accu racy. Green s in regul ation

Comparative growth of pinfish in field mesocosms across marsh, oyster, and soft-bottom habitat types in a Mississippi estuary

Building an NFL performance metric

Minimal influence of wind and tidal height on underwater noise in Haro Strait

Chapter 2: ANOVA and regression. Caroline Verhoeven

DISMAS Evaluation: Dr. Elizabeth C. McMullan. Grambling State University

Section I: Multiple Choice Select the best answer for each problem.

Stat 139 Homework 3 Solutions, Spring 2015

Statistical Method Certification, Coal Combustion Residuals Landfill, Reid Gardner Generating Station

Case Processing Summary. Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent % 0 0.0% % % 0 0.0%

Navigate to the golf data folder and make it your working directory. Load the data by typing

Lesson 22: Average Rate of Change

N Length (μm) % with eyespots Pilot ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± 16 70

Chapter 12 Practice Test

Diagnosis of Fuel Evaporative System

This page intentionally left blank

COMPLETING THE RESULTS OF THE 2013 BOSTON MARATHON

Projecting Three-Point Percentages for the NBA Draft

Name May 3, 2007 Math Probability and Statistics

Model 1: Reasenberg and Jones, Science, 1989

Effect of Urban and Suburban Median Types on Both Vehicular and Pedestrian Safety

The Simple Linear Regression Model ECONOMETRICS (ECON 360) BEN VAN KAMMEN, PHD

Robert Jones Bandage Report

Technical Report 99-6 EVALUATION OF RUNNING TURBINE 1 AT MAXIMUM CAPACITY ON PASSAGE OF ADULT SALMON AND STEELHEAD AT JOHN DAY DAM

An Empirical Comparison of Regression Analysis Strategies with Discrete Ordinal Variables

Available from Deakin Research Online:

Chapter 1: Why is my evil lecturer forcing me to learn statistics?

Chapter 1: Why is my evil lecturer forcing me to learn statistics?

Preparation for Salinity Control ME 121

Warm up: At what number do you think this ruler would balance on a pencil point?

MATH 118 Chapter 5 Sample Exam By: Maan Omran

A Cost Effective and Efficient Way to Assess Trail Conditions: A New Sampling Approach

Setting up group models Part 1 NITP, 2011

Nonlife Actuarial Models. Chapter 7 Bühlmann Credibility

CAAD CTF 2018 Rules June 21, 2018 Version 1.1

Smart Water Application Technologies (SWAT)

Reported walking time and measured distances to water sources: Implications for measuring Basic Service

IMPROVED RICE METHOD FOR DETERMINING THEORETICAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES

Art[,' c ""j) 01/1 /

Midterm Exam 1, section 2. Thursday, September hour, 15 minutes

C R I TFC. Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission

y ) s x x )(y i (x i r = 1 n 1 s y Statistics Lecture 7 Exploring Data , y 2 ,y n (x 1 ),,(x n ),(x 2 ,y 1 How two variables vary together

Improved Rice Method for Determining Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity of Asphalt Paving Mixtures

Effects on Auditory Attention and Walking While Texting with a Smartphone and Walking on Stairs

Copy of my report. Why am I giving this talk. Overview. State highway network

STT 315 Section /19/2014

Why so blue? The determinants of color pattern in killifish, Part II Featured scientist: Becky Fuller from The University of Illinois

PGA Tour Scores as a Gaussian Random Variable

MRI-2: Integrated Simulation and Safety

Membrane covered optical CO 2 sensor

NAME: Math 403 Final Exam 12/10/08 15 questions, 150 points. You may use calculators and tables of z, t values on this exam.

A NOVEL SENSOR USING REMOTE PLASMA EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY FOR MONITORING AND CONTROL OF VACUUM WEB COATING PROCESSES

STICTION: THE HIDDEN MENACE

Naval Postgraduate School, Operational Oceanography and Meteorology. Since inputs from UDAS are continuously used in projects at the Naval

ANALYSIS OF THE DOMINATING POWER OF SERVICE RECEPTION IN VOLLEYBALL IN DIFFERENT LEVELS OF COMPETITIONS

Keywords: multiple linear regression; pedestrian crossing delay; right-turn car flow; the number of pedestrians;

Internet Use Among Illinois Hunters: A Ten Year Comparison

FISH COMMUNITY STUDIES

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

The Effects of Inflation Gas on Tire Laboratory Test Performance

Accident data analysis using Statistical methods A case study of Indian Highway

Research Method Validation

Improving the Serving Motion in a Volleyball Game: A Design of Experiment Approach

Physical Analysis Model Report

Physical Fitness For Futsal Referee Of Football Association In Thailand

Transcription:

Experimental Design and Data Analysis Part 2 Assump@ons for Parametric Tests t- test and ANOVA Independence Variance Normality t-test Yes Yes Yes ANOVA Yes Yes Yes Lecture 7 AEC 460 Assume homogeneity of variances What s up with blocking, why should we do it, and what s a residual?!?! Examples of when you would use a block or a paired t- test, quick and dirty Environmental change in the sampling area, increases the within group varia@on, that may limit our ability to detect significant differences in our response variables Inter@dal Gradient of Exposure Edge effects along an eleva@on gradient ANOVAs Comparison of mul@ple means, normal distribu@on, equal varia@on F test for difference between any of the treatment means Then do a mul@ple comparison tests (LSD, least significant difference) 1

Nudibranchs in inter@dal regions with and without predators Preda@on on nudibranchs in the inter@dal community There is no difference in nudibranch numbers in reefs with or without predators Predator exclusion Experiment with more than two comparisons Have to compare more than two means Experiment on the effect of excluding predators of reef organisms What are we tes@ng (F Test) H0 = ucontrol = ucagecontrol = ucage Should you do three t- tests? No errors are compounded Be4er to use another technique that will avoid compounding error F = Treatment MS/Residual MS 2

NOTE: 3 Treatments (Cage, Control, Cage Control) This is a single Factor 6 Replicates in each treatment Here s how it works Each treatment (1-3) has associated mean and variance ANOVA par@@ons the variance into components TOTAL variance = Variance between + Variance within 3

Within Group Means: 13.67 8.67 10.33 Overall Mean = 10.9 NOTE: 3 Treatments (Cage, Control, Cage Control) 6 Replicates in each treatment One- way ANOVA General form of the t- test, can have more than 2 samples One- way ANOVA General form of the t- test, can have more than 2 samples A B C Ho: All samples the same Ha: At least one sample different Ho DATA A B A C B C Ha A C B 4

One- way ANOVA Just like t- test, compares differences between samples to differences within samples Mean squares: T- test sta@s@c (t) A B C Difference between means Standard error within sample MS= Sum of squares df Analogous to variance ANOVA sta@s@c (F) MS between groups MS within group ANOVA tables Variance: S 2 = Σ (x i x ) 2 n- 1 Sum of squared differences Treatment (between groups) Error (within groups) df SS MS F p df (X) SSX SSX MSX Look df (X)} MSE up! df (E) SSE SSE df (E) Total df (T) SST } 5

ANOVA in ANUTSHELL If the samples have been drawn from the same normally distributed popula@on, they should have equal means and variances The variance between groups = the variance within groups If NOT the case, then the samples were drawn from popula@ons with different means and/or variances How is it computed: Analysis of Variance Compute the variance between groups Divide by the variance within groups Logic: if there is no treatment effect, the variance between groups should be the same as the variance within groups As a result this would be the case: variance between variance within = 1 Deep Dark Secret WITHIN GROUPS is the same as ERROR Don t be confused by your sta@s@cal soeware output!! 6

between How much greater does your F- value need to be for you to say one of the groups is different? LOOK UP Cri@cal Value in your F- table! variation between > variation within 3.68 9.41 7

Assump_ons of ANOVA ANOVA is a parametric test which assumes that the data analyzed: Are con@nuous, interval data comprising a whole popula@on or sampled randomly from a popula@on. Has a normal distribu@on. Moderate departure from the normal distribu@on does not unduly disturb the outcome of ANOVA, especially as sample sizes increase. Highly skewed datasets result in inaccurate conclusions. The groups are independent of each other. The variances in the two groups should be similar. 8