Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

Similar documents
Bicycle and Pedestrian

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Off-road Trails. Guidance

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

and Rural Multimodal Networks 2017 ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN

New Jersey Department of Transportation. Complete Streets Summit Shukri Abuhuzeima NJDOT-Local Aid

Road Diets: Reconfiguring Streets for Multi-Modal Travel

BICYCLE FACILITIES INVENTORY: SUMMARY REPORT

USDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Initiative: Safer People and Safer Streets. Barbara McCann, USDOT Office of Policy

San Jose Transportation Policy

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

Innovative Urban Bikeway Design:

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

CSS and Complete Streets Partnering with Mn/DOT for Complete Streets. Scott Bradley Director of CSS April 27, 2010 CTS Research Conference

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

Lynchburg District Update

The Pedestrian Safety Action Plan

FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Bikeway Plan for the Roanoke Valley Area MPO Update ACKWOWLEDGEMENTS

Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside Program. June 28, 2017

PennDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Initiatives. Jonathan Heilman Roy Gothie Angela Watson

COMPLETE STREETS DESIGN STATE OF THE PRACTICE

PURPOSE AND POLICY GUIDANCE

7 Complete Streets & Roadway Aesthetics

Eastern PA Trail Summit October 1, 2018

PBIC Webinar. Improving Multimodal Outcomes through Performance Measurement and Design Flexibility. November 14, 2016

City of Waterloo Complete Streets Policy

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study Phase 2

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study (KATS) Complete Streets Policy Approved: Effective: FY 2018 Projects

MassDOT s Transportation Choice and Healthy Transportation Policy Initiatives

Who is Toole Design Group?

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

City of Madison: 2017 Capital Budget Capital Improvement Plan

Fargo Moorhead Metropolitan Area Complete Streets Policy Statement

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

transportation modes, first for developers to obligation programs improving centers.

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

SR 693 (Pasadena Avenue) Corridor Study from Shore Drive South to 66 th Street

Bicyclist Signing Guidelines

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Multimodal Connectivity: Walking & Wheeling to Transit

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Section 8. Partnerships and Funding

Town of Bethlehem. Planning Assessment. Bethlehem Town Board

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Complete Streets Training. Georgia Municipal Association June 27, 2016

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

The Role of MPOs in Advancing Safe Routes to School through the Transportation Alternatives Program

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning in a Historically Car-Centric Culture: A Focus on Connectivity, Safety, & Accessibility

VDOT BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT April 2017

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Fort Defiance Industrial Area Traffic Circulation Study Task Assignment MPD

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Transportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011

APPENDIX B: FUNDING MATRIX

Municipal Class EA To Address Traffic Congestion On The Ontario Street Corridor (Grand Bend) Public Information Meeting June 4, 2018

Complete Streets Workshop Follow-up. April 27, 2011 Rockledge City Hall

AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b HCAOG TAC meeting of May 8, 2014

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Transcription:

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding 2018 South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

Policy Changes: BOP

Bicycle Policy Changes The OLD Way Bicycle Occupancy Permit Complicated Unclear on maintenance issues Essentially stopped all on-road bike lane projects

Bicycle Policy Changes The New Way Letter of Request Clarifies most maintenance responsibilities Simple to add bike lanes into a restriping project Separated Bike Lanes still require an agreement District 6 is working on multiple projects now in coordination with local governments

Engineering NEW FACILITY DESIGNS COMING TO A ROAD NEAR YOU

Roadway design intended to be selfenforcing Engineering Bike Lanes Accommodating all modes, ages, and abilities Flexible and inexpensive Constrained by legislation in some cases Standards change over time

Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks FHWA Engineering / Policy Achieving Multimodal Networks: Applying Design Flexibility and Reducing Conflicts Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide Bicycle Facilities and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)

AASHTO GREEN BOOK Design Flexibility The intent of this policy is to provide guidance to the designer by referencing a recommended range of values for critical dimensions. Good highway design involves balancing safety, mobility, and preservation of scenic, aesthetic, historic, cultural, and environmental resources. This policy is therefore not intended to be a detailed design manual that could supersede the need for the application of sound principles by the knowledgeable design professional. Sufficient flexibility is permitted to encourage independent designs tailored to particular situations.

2007 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 2016 Transportation Advisory Committee's Bicycle and Pedestrian Policy Study Design Manual 1 PENNDOT Engineering / Policy Design Manual 2 Publication 111 Pavement Markings and Signing Standards Publication 236M Sign Index Publication 383 Traffic Calming Handbook Roundabouts

PennDOT Connects PENNDOT Engineering / Policy PennDOT and its Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and Rural Planning Organization (RPO) jointly prepare transportation studies, plans, and programs Through the PennDOT Connects process other community stakeholders (e.g., transit operators, economic development agencies, etc.) are actively involved to improve transportation system performance and achieve more livable communities.

PennDOT Connects PENNDOT Engineering / Policy PennDOT meets with local governments to discuss transportation needs. Larger, more complicated and expensive projects like roadway widening or intersection reconfiguration

PennDOT Connects PENNDOT Engineering / Policy The Department dedicates approximately $3 million a year in Statewide Planning and Research funds to transportation planning studies. Corridor congestion Land use continuity with existing transportation infrastructure Freight accessibility/ compatibility with surrounding land use Limited pedestrian and/or bicycle accommodations Stormwater management problems Lack of transit access WWW.PACONNECTS.ORG

Get Your Foot in the Door PENNDOT Restriping and Resurfacing Each District has a list of corridors prioritized for restriping and resurfacing These change after a review of winter s impacts Short turn-around time at District for decisions Have your plans ready identify priority locations Have your elected officials on-board with your plan Know you point of contact and keep discussions going

Get Your Foot in the Door PENNDOT Restriping and Resurfacing Decision-Making with PennDOT Some locations will not work for bike lanes Wider shoulders are a workable option Signing and markings can be fairly simple in rural areas

Mapping Ideas Low Stress Network Mapping does not need to be complicated in a small community Local roads inside a community are usually lower speed and lower volume But gaps larger roads with faster traffic limit the use of the network Bike lanes and other improvements can address this

Mapping Ideas DVRPC Level of Traffic Stress Connectivity and Analysis

Funding Resources

Funding Resources: PennDOT TAP Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are eligible for TAP funding. Eligibility TAP project sponsor can be a municipality or an authority; it cannot be registered as a 501(c). Eligible agencies include local governments, regional transportation authorities school districts and local education agencies or schools. Amount Construction projects must have a construction cost of at least $50,000. Applicants pay all pre-construction costs. TAP funds all construction phase costs at 100%, No match required.

Funding Resources: PennDOT TAP (MPO) Description Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are eligible for TAP funding. Eligibility Funding is only available to partners in these MPO areas. Check the websites of: DVRPC (Philadelphia area), SPC (Pittsburgh area), Lehigh Valley, HATS (Harrisburg area), Lancaster, Scranton/Wilkes-Barre, Reading, York and Shenango Valley.

Funding Resources: DCED Community Block Grant Description Grants and technical assistance are made available for federal designated municipalities for eligible types of community development in low-moderate income communities. This can be used for housing rehabilitation, public services, community facilities, infrastructure improvement, development and planning. Eligibility There are two tiers: an entitlement program, providing annual funding to designated municipalities; A competitive program available to non-federal entitlement municipalities and Act 179 entitlement municipalities with a population less than 10,000. Proposed projects must meet HUD established eligibility requirements and benefit low moderate income individuals or communities or assist in the elimination of slums and blight. Entitlement funding is set by formula. Competitive program is $750,000 maximum.

Funding Resources: DOT Multimodal Projects eligible for MTF funding include: Work to enhance bus stops, park and ride facilities, sidewalk/crosswalk safety improvements, bicycle lanes/route designations, etc.; Sidewalk connections, crosswalks, pedestrian and traffic signals, pedestrian signs and lighting; Improving signage, access roads, port upgrades, bicycle/shared lane markings and bicycle parking at transit stops; and Neighborhood scale transit-oriented development. NOTE: This Multimodal Transportation Fund differs from that of the DCED Eligibility: Municipalities, councils of governments, business/nonprofits, economic development organizations and public transportation agencies are eligible for funding. This is for projects of total cost of at least $100,000 to no more than $3,000,000. A minimum match of 30% is required.

Questions?