LTAP News INSIDE. Part 1 of the 2014 CA MUTCD On November 7, 2014, Caltrans adopted the California FALL 2015

Similar documents
MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES INTRODUCTION

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Module: Introduction and Part 1

Traffic Signs and Markings. Instructor: Dr. Yahya Sarraj Associate Prof. Of Transportation

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

CHAPTER 1A General PAGE

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

SECTION TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices

(This page left intentionally blank)

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

by MUTCD standards and guidance include signs, signals, pavement

LTAP News. Caltrans Construction Oversight Program is a INSIDE. Caltrans Construction Oversight Program. Fall 2013

FORWARD shal December, 2011

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Australian Standard. Manual of uniform traffic control devices. Part 3: Traffic control for works on roads AS AS 1742.

CTCDC California Traffic Control Devices Committee

PART 7. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR SCHOOL AREAS CHAPTER 7A. GENERAL

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Traffic Control Devices

Harford County Safe Walking to School Infrastructure Program. Jeff Springer, PE, AICP

Traffic Sign Handbook for Local Roads. Third Edition. July 2008 CLRP Report 08-04

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW VOLUME ROADS

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

What's in the 2012 California MUTCD for Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and School Areas?

RED COLORED TRANSIT-ONLY LANES REQUEST TO EXPERIMENT

Significant Changes to California's Yellow Signal Timing Protocols

Glossary of Terms. ABANDONMENT The permanent cessation of rail activity on a given line of railroad.

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

Kansas Handbook of Traffic Control Guidance for Low-Volume Rural Roads

PART 5. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW-VOLUME ROADS TABLE OF CONTENTS

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

PART 9. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ohio Department of Transportation Edition of the OMUTCD It s Here!

New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007

CHAPTER 313 Traffic Control Devices

ENFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION ENFIELD, CONNECTICUT

(This page left intentionally blank)

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

MANUAL OF TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ON CITY STREETS

Proposed changes to Massachusetts MUTCD Supplement

Edison Electric Institute. Work Zone Safety October 4-7, 2009

APPENDIX B1. CROSS-REFERENCE GUIDE TO THE OHIO REVISED CODE

Shortening or omitting a pedestrian change interval when transitioning into preemption

PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MARKINGS

Chapter 315 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. Section Manual and Specifications For Traffic Control Devices.

ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE (1) For

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

Purple Line Extension Community Meeting

MINNEAPOLIS PARK & RECREATION BOARD DRAFT TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR: SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS

MUTCD Workshop INLTAP Core Course #8. Laura Slusher, INLTAP Karen Stippich/Rick Drumm, FHWA

Regional School District #19 Transportation Policy

In creating the Federal Rule related to SOPuT, FHWA heard numerous comments and concerns such as:

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PROCEDURES

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Colored Bike Lanes Request to Experiment

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 7581 Performance Based Vegetation Management

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Railroad and Light Rail Transit and Signals Technical Committees

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

PURPOSE AND POLICY GUIDANCE

Chapter #4 Traffic Control Devices and Laws

Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 41

ADA Retrofits Triggered by Paving: What, When, and Why

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices II (MUTCD) Gregory J. Taylor, P.E.

MUTCD Part 6D: Pedestrian and Worker Safety

PART 2. SIGNS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Workshops. Work Zone Safety. Maintenance, and Utility Work Zones. Temporary Traffic Control for Construction,

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

2003 Edition Page 6F-1

T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE TRAFFIC CODE UPDATE MASTER RECOMMENDATION REPORT: 9.14, 9.16, 9.18

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Traffic Signs (1 of 3)

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

SECTION 14: LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

Work Zone Safety. Developed by HMTRI through cooperative agreement # 2 U45 ES with NIEHS

Traffic Signs Gregory J. Taylor, P.E.

Transcription:

LTAP News FALL 2015 Part 1 of the 2014 CA MUTCD On November 7, 2014, Caltrans adopted the California Manual on Uniform (CA MUTCD) 2014 edition pursuant to the provisions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 21400. The CA MUTCD provides uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices in California. Per Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations [23 CFR 655.603(b)(1)], the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) California Division Office found the revisions from the 2012 to the 2014 CA MUTCD to be in substantial conformance with the 2009 National MUTCD, including Revisions 1 and 2. Continued on pages 2-4 INSIDE Upcoming Trainings Safety Edge SM Demonstration Resources Available Caltrans News

Part 1 of the 2014 CA MUTCD (continued from page 1) Unless a particular device is no longer serviceable, non-compliant devices on existing highways and bikeways shall be brought into compliance with the current national manual as part of the systematic upgrading of substandard traffic control devices (and installation of new required traffic control devices). Target compliance dates established by the FHWA shall be as shown in Table I-2 and compliance dates established through CVC 21401 are shown in Table I-2(CA) and Table I-101(CA). Part 1 of the CA MUTCD is a great fundamental resource to find explanations on how devices are to be represented. In a beneficial way, Part 1 is a bit of a wild card for the practitioner as it wonderfully supports all the remaining parts of the CA MUTCD (Parts 2-9). Reviewing appropriate sections of Part 1 may provide the revelation needed when contemplating other portions of the CA MUTCD to operate your facility, answer a question from the public or your elected officials, or allow for an innovative operation that seeks to better control the situation you have on your transportation facility. Here is a brief narrative on each of the sections in Part 1: Section 1A.01 Purpose of Traffic control devices provide for the orderly movement of all road users. Traffic control devices or their supports shall not have any advertising message or any other message that is not related to traffic control. Section 1A.02 Principles of Uniform meaning of traffic control devices is vital to their effectiveness. To be effective, a traffic control device should meet five basic requirements: A. Fulfill a need; B. Command attention; C. Convey a clear, simple meaning; D. Command respect from road users; and E. Give adequate time for proper response. Section 1A.03 Design of Devices should be designed so that features such as size, shape, color, etc. meet the requirements in Section 1A.02. Section 1A.04 Placement and Operation of Traffic Control Devices The location and legibility of the traffic control device should be such that a road user has adequate time to make the proper response in both day and night conditions. Unnecessary traffic control devices should be removed. The fact that a device is in good physical condition should not be a basis for deferring needed removal or change. Section 1A.05 Maintenance of Maintenance is categorized into two forms functional and physical. Not only should devices be monitored to make sure they can be seen with adequate time to react, but also reviewed if a modification should be done to the devices, or if removal is more appropriate. Section 1A.06 Uniformity of Any given device shall have the same meaning and require the same action on the part of motorists regardless of where it is encountered. Section 1A.07 Responsibility for The responsibility for the design, placement, operation, maintenance, and uniformity of traffic control devices shall rest with the public agency or, in the case of private roads open to public travel, with the private owner or private official having jurisdiction. Subject to the requirements in CVC Sections 21100, 21100.1, 21107, 21107.5, 21107.6, and 21107.7, no person shall install or maintain in any area of private property used by the public any sign, signal, or marking or other device intended to regulate, warn, or guide traffic unless it conforms to Caltrans standards and specifications. California LTAP Fall 2015 2

Part 1 of the 2014 CA MUTCD (continued) Section 1A.08 Authority for Placement of Traffic Control Devices Traffic control devices, advertisements, announcements, and other signs or messages within the highway right-ofway shall be placed only as authorized by a public authority or the official having jurisdiction, or, in the case of private roads open to public travel, by the private owner or private official having jurisdiction, for the purpose of regulating, warning, or guiding traffic. When the public agency or the official having jurisdiction over a street or highway or, in the case of private roads open to public travel, the private owner or private official having jurisdiction, has granted proper authority, others such as contractors and public utility companies shall be permitted to install temporary traffic control devices in temporary traffic control zones. All regulatory traffic control devices shall be supported by laws, ordinances, or regulations. Signs and other devices that do not have any traffic control purpose that are placed within the highway right-of-way shall not be located where they will interfere with, or detract from, traffic control devices. Any unauthorized traffic control device or other sign or message placed on the highway rightof-way by a private organization or individual constitutes a public nuisance and should be removed. All unofficial or nonessential traffic control devices, signs, or messages should be removed. Section 1A.09 Engineering Study and Engineering Judgment The CA MUTCD describes the application of traffic control devices, but shall not be a legal requirement for their installation. The decision to use a particular device at a particular location should be made on the basis of either an engineering study or the application of engineering judgment. Thus, while the CA MUTCD provides standards, guidance, and options for design and applications of traffic control devices, the CA MUTCD should not be considered a substitute for engineering judgment. Engineering judgment should be exercised in the selection and application of traffic control devices, as well as in the location and design of roads and streets that the devices complement. In California, traffic engineers are classified under a title act and not under a practice act. Traffic engineers can conduct studies, but a civil engineer must sign plans for traffic control devices that will be placed in the field, per the Professional Engineers Act. Section 1A.10 Interpretations, Experimentations, Changes, and Interim Approvals The FHWA Division Office can assist with answering questions related to the MUTCD, but official requests for interpretation, permission to experiment, interim approval, or change should be emailed to the Federal Highway Administration, Office of Transportation Operations, MUTCD Team, at MUTCDofficialrequest@dot.gov. Requests for experimentation, interpretation, or changes relating to the California edited portion of the California MUTCD should be sent to the Executive Secretary, California Traffic Control Devices Committee MS36, P.O. Box 942874, Sacramento, CA 94274-0001. Section 1A.11 Relation to Other Publications The latest editions of publications noted are part of the CA MUTCD: Standard Highway Signs and Markings book (FHWA); and Color Specifications for Retroreflective Sign and Pavement Marking Materials (appendix to subpart F of Part 655 of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations). The latest edition of Caltrans California Sign Specifications is a part of this manual as well (http://www. dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/engineering/ control-devices/specs.htm). California LTAP Fall 2015 3

Part 1of the 2014 CA MUTCD (continued) Section 1A.12 Color Code The general meaning of the 13 colors used for traffic control are as follows: 1. Black regulation 2. Blue road user services guidance, tourist information and evacuation route 3. Brown recreational and cultural interest area guidance 4. Coral unassigned 5. Fluorescent Pink incident management 6. Fluorescent Yellow-Green pedestrian warning, bicycle warning, playground warning, school bus and school warning 7. Green indicated movements permitted, direction guidance 8. Light Blue unassigned 9. Orange temporary traffic control 10. Purple lanes restricted to use only by vehicles with registered electronic toll collection (ETC) accounts 11. Red stop or prohibition 12. White regulation 13. Yellow warning Section 1A.13 Definitions of Headings, Words, and Phrases in this Manual Definitions of the terminology used in the CA MUTCD are provided in this section. If not listed, definitions from resources provided in Section 1A.11 are to be used. Descriptions of the paragraph headings within the CA MUTCD are as follows: Support an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, prohibition, or enforceable condition. Support statements are labeled, and the text appears in unbold type. The verbs shall, should, and may are not used in Support statements. Standard a statement of required, mandatory, or specifically prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All Standard statements are labeled, and the text appears in bold type. The verb shall is typically used. Guidance a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineering judgment or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements are labeled, and the text appears in unbold type. The verb should is typically used. Option a statement of practice that is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Option statements sometime contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance statement. Section 1A.14 Meanings of Acronyms and Abbreviations in this Manual This section provides for the meaning of the acronyms used in the CA MUTCD text. Acronyms in this section may or may not be allowed to be used in word message portions of traffic control devices. For the list of those approved abbreviations, see Section 1A.15. Section 1A.15 Abbreviations Used on Table 1A-1 provides for appropriate abbreviations of all devices besides portable changeable message signs, Section 6F.60. Word messages that need to be abbreviated on a portable changeable message sign shall use Table 1A-2. For information about the National MUTCD portions (black text) of the CA MUTCD, contact Kevin Korth at (916) 498-5860 or kevin.d.korth@dot.gov. California LTAP Fall 2015 4

Resources Available Retroreflectometers The LTAP Center has two retroreflectometers available to local agencies at no charge. To make a reservation for up to two weeks, send an email to californialtap@cce.csus.edu. Local agencies will be required to sign a Loan-Borrow Agreement and pick up and return the equipment at one of two locations: Northern California California State University, Sacramento Southern California California State University, San Marcos Gravel Roads Construction & Maintenance Guide This guide covers routine maintenance and rehabilitation of gravel surfaced roads; types of drainage; surface gravel; dust control/stabilization; and recent innovations in alternative surface materials, stabilization, dust control, and equipment. Inspector s Job Guide The Inspector s Job Guide and Highway Maintenance Tables booklet covers the duties before beginning inspection; safety; uniform color code; concrete curb, gutter, walk, driveway and barrier; plant mix bituminous paving; concrete paving; base course; truck scale; culvert pipe installation; storm sewer installation; grading; seeding, finishing, etc.; structures; geotextiles; bituminous surface treatment; wind chill equivalent temperatures; and rules for writing metric symbols and names. LTAP Hosts a Safety Edge SM Demonstration On October 21st, the California LTAP Center, in partnership with the Kings County Public Works Department, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), California Asphalt Pavement Association, and Papich Construction Co., hosted an open house in Hanford to demonstrate the constructability of the Safety Edge SM for mitigating pavement edge drop-off. The Safety Edge SM creates a more durable pavement edge and makes recovery from any future drop-off much easier and safer to traverse back up onto ones travel lane. For more information on the Safety Edge SM technology, contact Ken Kochevar at the FHWA California Division Office at ken.kochevar@dot.gov or (916) 498-5853. Request your complimentary copy of the Inspector s Job Guide and Gravel Roads Construction & Maintenance Guide by emailing californialtap@cce.csus.edu. California LTAP Fall 2015 5

Caltrans News Local Assistance Procedures Manual The LAPM will be updated and posted to Caltrans website every July and January. www.dot.ca.gov/hq/localprograms/ lam/lapm.htm Subscribe today to the LAB Caltrans Local Assistance blog at www.localassistanceblog.com. You ll receive email notifications of new posts, forums, and resources that will be helpful as you deliver your transportation projects. The Mile Marker: A Caltrans Performance Report Caltrans published their summer edition of The Mile Marker. www.dot.ca.gov/ctjournal/ MileMarker/2015-2/index.html Upcoming Trainings Register today at RESIDENT ENGINEERS ACADEMY January 11-14, 2016 March 7-10, 2016 May 9-12, 2016 Eureka Fresno San Diego Due to limited seating in the Resident Engineers Academy, you must request admittance by sending an email to the Caltrans District Training Coordinator or DLAE in your area at www.dot.ca.gov/hq/localprograms/training/dtcs.htm. Once the priority registration list has been compiled and approved by Caltrans, you will receive an email from our registrar with instructions on how to register online. For more information, visit. FEDERAL AID SERIES November 3-5, 2015 November 9-10, 2015 February 22-26, 2016 April 11-15, 2016 June 6-10, 2016 Stockton Stockton Fresno Irvine Redding A registration fee of $50 will be charged to attend any combination of days within the same week of training. Caltrans will continue to subsidize the remainder of the training. PROCURING A&E CONTRACTS January 28, 2016 Eureka Additional Caltrans-subsidized trainings are available through UC Berkeley s Technology Transfer Program at www.techtransfer.berkeley.edu/schedule. California LTAP Fall 2015 6