Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

Similar documents
Results and conclusions of a floating Lidar offshore test

WIND ENERGY REPORT GERMANY 2013

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

Carbon Trust Offshore Wind Accelerator. OWA floating LiDAR campaign: Babcock trial at Gwynt Y Môr Copenhagen, 11 March 2015 Megan Smith

FINO1 Mast Correction

OFFSHORE CREDENTIALS. Accepted for wind resource assessment onshore and offshore by leading Banks Engineers, globally

Increased Project Bankability : Thailand's First Ground-Based LiDAR Wind Measurement Campaign

CORRELATION EFFECTS IN THE FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF GROUND BASED REMOTE WIND SENSORS

Executive Summary of Accuracy for WINDCUBE 200S

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

DIRECTION DEPENDENCY OF OFFSHORE TURBULENCE INTENSITY IN THE GERMAN BIGHT

On- and Offshore Assessment of the ZephIR Wind-LiDAR

The NORCOWE legacy - data and instrumentation

3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain

The OWEZ Meteorological Mast

Measurement and simulation of the flow field around a triangular lattice meteorological mast

Miscalculations on the estimation of annual energy output (AEO) of wind farm projects

LiDAR Application to resource assessment and turbine control

2. Fachtagung Energiemeteorologie 2011, Bremerhaven SITE ASSESSMENT. WIND TURBINE ASSESSMENT. GRID INTEGRATION. DUE DILIGENCE. KNOWLEDGE.

3D Turbulence at the Offshore Wind Farm Egmond aan Zee J.W. Wagenaar P.J. Eecen

E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences

VALIDATION OF WIND SPEED DISTURBANCES TO CUPS AT THE METEORLOCICAL MAST ON THE OFFSHORE PLATFORM FINO1 USING WIND-LIDAR MEASUREMENTS.

10 years of meteorological measurements at FINO1

Windcube FCR measurements

Full Classification acc. to IEC for SoDAR AQ510 Wind Finder. Vincent Camier, Managing Director, Ammonit Measurement GmbH

Remote sensing standards: their current status and significance for offshore projects

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Correlation analysis between UK onshore and offshore wind speeds

Evaluation of wind flow with a nacelle-mounted, continuous wave wind lidar

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

MULTI-WTG PERFORMANCE OFFSHORE, USING A SINGLE SCANNING DOPPLER LIDAR

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 112 (2015 )

Wind measurements that reduce electricity prices

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Control Strategies for operation of pitch regulated turbines above cut-out wind speeds

PROJECT CYCLOPS: THE WAY FORWARD IN POWER CURVE MEASUREMENTS?

Site Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 84 (2014 )

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

Deploying the TCM-1 Tilt Current Meter in an Inverted (Hanging) Orientation By: Nick Lowell, Founder & President

Offshore Micrositing - Meeting The Challenge

Strategic Advice about Floating LiDAR Campaigns. Borssele offshore wind farm

New IEC and Site Conditions in Reality

can the wind industry bank on wind lidar? November 2014

Report on the Research Project OWID Offshore Wind Design Parameter

Flow analysis with nacellemounted

ScienceDirect. Relating baseball seam height to carry distance

Procedia Engineering Procedia Engineering 2 (2010)

ScienceDirect. Rebounding strategies in basketball

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

MOTUS Wave Buoys. Powered By the Aanderaa MOTUS Directional Wave Sensor

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

Basketball free-throw rebound motions

TESTING AND CALIBRATION OF VARIOUS LiDAR REMOTE SENSING DEVICES FOR A 2 YEAR OFFSHORE WIND MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGN

FIVE YEARS OF OPERATION OF THE FIRST OFFSHORE WIND RESEARCH PLATFORM IN THE GERMAN BIGHT FINO1

Power curves - use of spinner anemometry. Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor

GL GH Offshore Wind Measurements

WIND DATA REPORT. Bourne Water District

Comparison of flow models

EMPOWERING OFFSHORE WINDFARMS BY RELIABLE MEASUREMENTS

The Offshore Boundary Layer Observatory (OBLO) Possibilities for the offshore wind industry

Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

WIND INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS

FUGRO/OCEANOR SEAWATCH WIND LIDAR BUOY ASSESSMENT OF THE FUGRO/OCEANOR SEAWATCH FLOATING LIDAR VERIFICATION AT RWE IJMUIDEN MET MAST

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

Certification of AMS acc. EN 15267, Part 3 - Overview and First Experience -

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

Upgrading Vestas V47-660kW

Analysis and Verification of Wind Data from Ground-based LiDAR

Offshore Wind Turbine Wake Characterization using Scanning Doppler Lidar

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 116 (2015 )

Tidal influence on offshore and coastal wind resource predictions at North Sea. Barbara Jimenez 1,2, Bernhard Lange 3, and Detlev Heinemann 1.

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

NORCOWE met-ocean measurement campaigns

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Bishop & Clerks

WIND DATA REPORT. Swan s Island, ME

A Study of the Normal Turbulence Model in IEC

Coherence of turbulent wind at FINO1

Predicting climate conditions for turbine performance

Keywords: multiple linear regression; pedestrian crossing delay; right-turn car flow; the number of pedestrians;

Wind Resource Assessment Østerild National Test Centre for Large Wind Turbines

Assessment and Testing of Island Wind Resources without Masts

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

FRØYA SEAWATCH WIND LIDAR BUOY PRE-DEPLOYMENT VALIDATION

COMPARASION OF WIND MEASUREMENTS BY LIDAR AND MEASUREMENT MAST FOR BORA WIND IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. Elvir Zlomušica, Suad Zalihić, Jasmin Bejdić

WIND DATA REPORT. Quincy DPW, MA

NORCOWE Reference Wind Farm

Aalborg Universitet. Published in: Proceedings of Offshore Wind 2007 Conference & Exhibition. Publication date: 2007

Measuring offshore winds from onshore one lidar or two?

Control System for Start-up and Shut-down of a Floating Vertical Axis Wind Turbine

COMPARISON OF ZEPHIR MEASUREMENTS AGAINST CUP ANEMOMETRY AND POWER CURVE ASSESSMENT

Windar Photonics Wind Sensor. Great at Control

WIND DATA REPORT. Ragged Mt Maine

Available online at ScienceDirect. The 2014 Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 147 (2016 ) 74 80

Wind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m

SEA-LEVEL AND SEA-STATE MEASUREMENTS WITH RADAR LEVEL SENSORS. Dr. Ulrich Barjenbruch 1 and Jens Wilhelmi 2

Transcription:

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 53 (2014 ) 156 161 EERA DeepWind 2014, 11th Deep Sea Offshore Wind R&D Conference Results and conclusions of a floating-lidar offshore test J. Gottschall a *, G. Wolken-Möhlmann a, T. Viergutz a, B. Lange a a Fraunhofer IWES, Am Seedeich 45, 27572 Bremerhaven, Germany Abstract In this contribution we introduce the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy, a floating-lidar prototype comprising a proven marine buoy design and a pulsed lidar device integrated in it. A software correction algorithm was developed to remove the effects of sea conditions resulting in system motions from the recorded lidar data. The final performance of the system was verified in a measurement campaign next to the offshore meteorological mast FINO1 in the German North Sea. Both the results of an accuracy assessment and a more detailed sensitivity analysis of the floating-lidar performance with respect to different external parameters were performed. For the recorded horizontal mean wind speeds a very good measurement performance with an R 2 -value of 0.996 is achieved even when no motion correction is applied. To use the turbulence intensity and wind direction data from the system, the application of a motion correction is necessary. The overall System Availability for the nine-weeks-measurement period was derived as 98%. 2014 Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Selection and peer-review under responsibility of SINTEF Energi AS. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of SINTEF Energi AS Keywords: floating lidar; FINO1 met. mast; verification test; sensitivitiy analysis. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 471 14290 354 E-mail address: julia.gottschall@iwes.fraunhofer 1876-6102 2014 Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Selection and peer-review under responsibility of SINTEF Energi AS doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.224

J. Gottschall et al. / Energy Procedia 53 ( 2014 ) 156 161 157 1. Introduction During the last years it was shown that floating-lidar systems, defined as a LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) wind measuring device integrated in or placed on top of a buoy, offer a great potential to assess offshore wind resources. In particular, these systems are a cost-effective and comparatively flexible alternative to fixed offshore meteorological (met.) masts. The development of suitable, i.e. for an application in the offshore wind industry optimized, floating-lidar systems has made considerable progress within the last few years. The realisations, developed in different R&D projects and being partly commercially offered already today, vary not only in the adapted lidar technology and buoy concepts but also in their strategies for data handling or power supply as well as in the consideration of motion effects on the recorded data. A comprehensive overview of different floating-lidar systems is e.g. given in [1], selected systems are introduced in more detail in [1a-c]. In this contribution we focus on our own development, the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy that is introduced in 2. Following the system introduction, we present the results and conclusions of the first offshore trial of the system next to the FINO1 met. mast. The paper is concluded with a brief summary in 4. 2. Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy The Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy was developed within the R&D project Offshore Messboje (funded by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, with a duration of two years from 2011 to 2013). The prototype was completed in spring 2013. The developed floating-lidar system integrates a Windcube v2 lidar device in an adapted marine buoy, designed according to the navigational-light buoy LT81. The complete buoy has a height of 7.2 m, a diameter of 2.55 m and a weight of 4.7 t. The system is characterized by its encapsulated lidar device, placed in a custom-made housing to ensure maximum protection against the offshore environment. An autonomous power system was designed and assembled based on three micro-wind turbines, solar panels and AGM battery banks for energy storage. The motioncorrection algorithm, with respect to that the internal (motion-) measurement system was set up, was developed by Fraunhofer IWES in preliminary studies to the project, and has been implemented as part of the post-processing of the floating-lidar data. The algorithm utilizes high-frequency (10 Hz) yaw and tilt data from a motion-measurement system that runs in parallel to the lidar device. Based on these data a coordinate transformation for the reference system of the lidar measurements is performed, and the recorded lidar data are corrected considering a fixed refernce system cf. the description in [2]. Figure 1 shows the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy before and during installation for its first offshore trial in the German North Sea. Figure 1: Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy ( Fraunhofer IWES / Photographs: Caspar Sessler)

158 J. Gottschall et al. / Energy Procedia 53 ( 2014 ) 156 161 3. Offshore test next to FINO1 met. mast The offshore test of the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy next to the FINO1 met. mast was arranged to validate the functionality of the system and to verify its measurement performance. In this regard, both the system availability and the accuracy of the recorded data in comparison to the FINO1 reference data were studied. 3.1 Setup of offshore test The research platform FINO1 is located in the German North Sea about 45 km north of the East Frisian island Borkum (exact coordinates of the platform are N 54 00 53.5 E 6 35 15.5 ). The water depth at the location is approximately 30 m. The predominant wind direction is south-east with a yearly-averaged wind speed of 9.9 m/s at 100 m height. The direction of the sea currents is governed by the prevailing tide. The offshore wind farm and test field alpha ventus is located to the east of FINO1 with a closest distance of 400 m. The Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy was installed on 2 August 2013 at the location N 54 01.00 E 6 34.89, i.e. north-west of the met. mast in a distance of about 450 m. A bottom-based AWAC system (for measuring the sea conditions), that is part of the Fraunhofer IWES floating-lidar concept, was installed during the first visit for inspection on 28 August 2013 at the location N 54 00.99 E 6 34.63. Both systems were recovered according to plan on 6 October 2013. 3.2 Results The overall measurement duration for the offshore verification test is defined by the installation and deinstallation of the floating-lidar system, which corresponds to 65 complete days or about nine weeks. According to our pre-set lidar measurement heights (from 40 m to 260 m in steps of 20 m) and the heights of the cup anemometers at the FINO1 met. mast, we identified as height levels for the verification of horizontal wind speeds 100 m, 80 m, 60 m and 40 m. The cup anemometers at the three lower heights are boom-mounted, the anemometer at 100 m is top-mounted with a cage for protection but leading also to further distortion around it. Wind vanes for reference wind direction measurements are not mounted at the same height levels as the cup anemometers. For comparisons with the lidar measurements and for filtering purposes, we have used the vanes at one level below i.e. 90 m, 70 m, 50 m and 33 m. The availability of the floating-lidar system during the period of the offshore trial was evaluated by deriving the respective Key Performance Indicator (KPI) defined in [2]. The System Availability is defined in that context as the fraction of time, the lidar system is ready to function according to the specifications and deliver data, taking into account all time-stamped data entries in the output data files including flagged data. The value of the KPI is then the number of those time-stamped data entries relative to the maximum possible number of 10-min data entries including periods of maintenance (regarded as 100%) within the considered period. The numbers we obtain for our nine-weeks trial are listed in Table 1. Table 1: Derived numbers for System Availability defined according to [2]. Monthly / Overall System (LIDAR system) Availability: (02-31 August 2013) 4144 / 4257 = 97% (01-30 September 2013) 4256 / 4320 = 99% (overall) 9228 / 9405 = 98% Figure 2 shows the correlation between measured horizontal mean wind speeds from the floating-lidar device and the reference cup anemometer at 100 m measurement height together with the results of a two-parameter linear regression. Before applying the regression analysis, the data were filtered according to the following criteria: A valid wind direction sector was defined by the wind directions between 280 and 350, corresponding to the directions where no wake effects affect the reference data; Only (reference) horizontal mean wind speeds larger or equal 2 m/s were considered as specified in [2];

J. Gottschall et al. / Energy Procedia 53 ( 2014 ) 156 161 159 Lidar data availability for each 10-min interval, defined as the corresponding parameter output by the Windcube lidar device, was required to be 100%. Both the correlation plot and the regression results (see Figure 2) demonstrate a very good agreement of the measured mean wind speeds and therewith a very good performance of the tested floating-lidar device for this measurement variable. The obtained coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.996 is well within the best-practice acceptance criteria of 0.98 in [2]. Figure 2: Correlation between measured 10-min-mean (horizontal) wind speeds from floating-lidar device and reference cup anemometer at 100 m measurement height. In order to study the performance of the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy in its first offshore trial in more detail, we performed different sensibility analyses. The plots in Figure 3 show both the deviation in measured horizontal mean wind speeds and the deviations in recorded turbulence intensity (TI) values defined as wind speed standard deviation divided by mean wind speed versus the simultaneously recorded significant wave height at the location of the deployment. Deviations in mean speed between floating-lidar and reference cup anemometer measurements show no significant dependence on the prevailing wave heights. For the TI values, on the contrary, a clear trend is visible characterized by larger deviations or larger floating-lidar values compared to the reference, respectively, with increasing wave heights. Figure 3: Deviations in measured 10-min (left) mean wind speeds and (right) turbulence intensity (TI) values from floating lidar and reference cup anemometer at 100 m measurement height versus simultaneously recorded (30-min-mean) significant wave height. To eliminate this trend in the TI values and obtain usable data, a motion correction needs to be applied to the recorded data. Figure 4 shows both uncorrected and corrected data (in red and blue, respectively) for the three measurement variables mean wind speed, turbulence intensity and wind direction again as the correlation with respect to the reference data from the met. mast. For the correction of the floating-lidar data, the motion-correction

160 J. Gottschall et al. / Energy Procedia 53 ( 2014 ) 156 161 algorithm developed by Fraunhofer IWES was applied. For the wind speed data the influence of the correction is only marginal mainly because the correlation between the uncorrected floating-lidar data and the reference was already extremely good. For the turbulence intensity and wind direction data, however, the application of the correction results in a significant improvement of the correlation with the reference data. 20 18 16 no correction full correction 0.35 0.3 lidar wind speed [m/s] 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 lidar TI [-] 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 no correction full correction 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 reference wind speed [m/s] 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 reference TI [-] 350 lidar wind direction [ ] 300 250 200 150 100 no correction full correction Figure 4: Uncorrected (red) and corrected (blue) floating-lidar data versus reference data from met. mast mean wind speed, turbulence intensity (TI) and wind direction from top left over top right to bottom left. 50 0 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 reference wind direction [ ] 3.3 Conclusions from offshore test The results of the first offshore test for the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy are largely in line with the acceptance criteria for the KPIs defined in [3]. For the recorded horizontal mean wind speeds a very good measurement performance is even achieved when no motion correction is applied. To use the turbulence intensity and wind direction data from the system, the application of a motion correction is necessary. A further analysis of the test results in terms of a sensibility study with respect to different external parameters is extremely helpful to assess the performance of the floating-lidar device under test in more detail, and is necessary to estimate the complete uncertainty budget for the floating-lidar measurements in the final application cf. [4]. Further work on Recommended Practices for the use of floating-lidar systems including procedures for a verification and classification of the systems is scheduled within the IEA Task 32 / Work Package 1.5. Our results and conclusions will be an input to this work.

J. Gottschall et al. / Energy Procedia 53 ( 2014 ) 156 161 161 4. Summary The Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy has been introduced as a compact floating-lidar concept with an encapsulated (well-protected) lidar device, a reliable power supply strategy, and an efficient (in-house developed) motion-correction algorithm. Wind speed measurements, recorded in the first offshore trial of the system, show a very good correlation with the reference data from the FINO1 met. mast. Wind direction and turbulence intensity data require the application of a motion correction. Further work on the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy is in progress a second offshore test with a modified prototype is planned for the first half of 2014. Acknowledgements The project Offshore Messboje was funded by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety / BMU, Germany (FKZ 032538). References [1] T. Rogers et al. Path toward Bankability of Floating Lidar Data. Proceedings of EWEA Offshore Event, Frankfurt, 2013. [1a] G. Howe (presenter). AXYS WindSentinel. Proceedings of EWEA Conference 2013 (published online), Vienna, 2013. [1b] T. Kyriazis (presenter). Low cost and flexible offshore wind measurements using a floating lidar solution (FLIDAR ). Proceedings of EWEA Conference 2013 (published online), Vienna, 2013. [1c] J.-P. Mathisen. Measurement of wind profile with a buoy mounted lidar. Energy Procedia / Proceedings of DeepWind Conference 2013 to be published, 2013. [2] G. Wolken-Möhlmann, B. Lange. Simulation of motion-induced measurement errors for wind measurements with LIDAR on floating platforms. Proceedings of ISARS conference, Paris, 2010. [3] Carbon Trust Offshore Wind Accelerator roadmap for the commercial acceptance of floating LIDAR technology, CTC819 Version 1.0, 21 November 2013 (http://www.carbontrust.com/media/422195/ctc819-owa-roadmap-commercial-acceptance-floating-lidar-technologies.pdf) [4] IEC 61400-12-1 Ed.2 CD / IEC 61400-12-1: Wind turbines Part 12-1: Power performance measurements of electricity producing wind turbines, Committee Draft, June 2013