and Rural Multimodal Networks 2017 ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN

Similar documents
Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

CONTEXT SENSITIVE STREETS STANDARDS COMMITTEE

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Who is Toole Design Group?

Road Diets: Reconfiguring Streets for Multi-Modal Travel

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide

USDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Initiative: Safer People and Safer Streets. Barbara McCann, USDOT Office of Policy

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

Bicycle Boulevards and Neighborhood Greenways

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan

Land Use Patterns. Traditional Modern

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN

Multimodal Transportation Plan

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

LOUISIANA COMPLETE STREETS POLICY. Ellen W. Soll, AICP Principal Soll Planning

This page intentionally left blank.

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

Planning Suburban Bike Networks

Agency Advisory Group Meeting #3 and Walk Audit Anchorage Non-Motorized Plan

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

COMPLETE STREETS DESIGN STATE OF THE PRACTICE

DRAFT MOVING FORWARD RHODE ISLAND BICYCLE MOBILITY PLAN 2018 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY IN ASSOCIATION WITH

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Why Zone In on Speed Reduction?

PBIC Webinar. Improving Multimodal Outcomes through Performance Measurement and Design Flexibility. November 14, 2016

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

PBIC Webinar. How to Create a Bicycle Safety Action Plan: Planning for Safety [IMAGE] Oct. 2, 2014, 2 pm

7 Complete Streets & Roadway Aesthetics

Safety & Convenience for All Users, in All Modes. Barbara McCann NCSL December 3, 2013

G AT E WAY PLAN. Community BRIEFING KIT GATEWAY BIKE

2014 Wisconsin Tribal Transportation Conference. Matt Halada Transportation Planner NE Region

MassDOT s Transportation Choice and Healthy Transportation Policy Initiatives

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

COMPLETE STREETS PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

Strategies for Making Multimodal Environments Safer. Kim Kolody Silverman, CH2M

ADVISORY BICYCLE LANES REALITY VERSUS DESIGN GUIDANCE

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Classification Criteria

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

COMPLETE STREETS A STEP FORWARD ITE District 10/FSITE Annual Meeting November 3, 2015

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

Santa Ana Creating Community Together

Chapter 9: Pedestrians and Bicyclists

What Is a Complete Street?

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

Safety Emphasis Areas & Safety Project Development Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

2016 Planning Conference July 26, CONNECT COLUMBUS Building Columbus Transportation Future

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Active Transportation Access to Transit

The 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide: An Overview

Complete Streets Training. Georgia Municipal Association June 27, 2016

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

Connecting cyclists to work. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

May 6-8, 2018 Four Points by Sheraton Kingston 285 King Street East Kingston, ON

Bike Planning: A New Day

Complete Streets implementation in Chicagoland

Linking Transportation and Health in Nashville & Middle Tennessee

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Technical Memorandum. Shoulder Width Standards for State Highways. Expiration. Implementation. Introduction. Purpose

WINTER CYCLING CONGRESS. Small Town and Rural Bicycle and Pedestrian Design Guide

APPENDIX D LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS METHODOLOGY

DRAFT Montgomery County Bicycle Master Plan Design Toolkit

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Closing Plenary Session

Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation Guideline Development

Transcription:

Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks 2017 ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN

SMALL TOWN AND RURAL MULTIMODAL NETWORKS GUIDE Why a Rural and Small Town Focused Guide? ONE SIZE DOES NOT FIT ALL. The new FHWA-endorsed guide for Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks is a facility design guide focused on design solutions for suburban areas, small towns, and rural areas places that, until recently have not been showcased in photographs of best practices around the country. Based in FHWA and AASHTO guidance, this guide fulfills the need and desire to make travel safer and more active in small and rural communities, with visualizations and flexible design guidance for contemporary walking and biking facilities. LONGER NON-LOCAL TRIP DISTANCES Rural trip distances have been increasing. HEALTH DISPARITIES Rural areas have higher rates of physical inactivity and chronic disease than urbanized areas. HIGHER CRASH RATES While only 19 percent of the population lives in rural areas, 58 percent of all fatal crashes and 60 percent of traffic fatalities were recorded in rural regions. INCOME DISPARITIES Urban households earn 32 percent more in yearly income than rural households. 2

EXAMPLE APPLICATION MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME (ADT) Speed and Volume Most appropriate on streets with low to moderate volumes and moderate speed motor vehicles. 12k 10k 8k 6k 4k 2k How to Use the Guide FACILITIES AND DESIGN CONTEXT Each design solution is accompanied by guidance on best applications based on roadway characteristics, roadway network configuration, and adjacent land use Network 10 20 30 40 50 MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATING SPEED (MI/H) Applies to constrained connections between built-up areas. A SPEED AND VOLUME Where is the facility type most appropriate, based on typical speed and volume of motor vehicles? LOCAL COLLECTOR HIGHWAY B NETWORK On which part of a roadway network is the facility type likely to be applicable? Land Use For use outside, between and within built-up areas with bicycle and pedestrian demand and limited available paved roadway surface. C LAND USE Is the facility best suited for within built-up areas, or outside them? OUTSIDE OF BUILT-UP AREAS WITHIN BUILT-UP AREAS 3

SMALL TOWN AND RURAL MULTIMODAL NETWORKS GUIDE Creating Safe, Innovative Networks While many communities have invested in places to walk or ride a bicycle, smaller towns and communities may face unique challenges in creating connected networks. A complete network creates safe, comfortable, and accessible multimodal routes for a range of ages and abilities walking and bicycling, comprised of varying facilities, such as shared use paths, sidewalks, and bike lanes. The guide is organized into the following six areas: INTRODUCTION How to Use this Guide Creating Networks Common Challenges in Small Town and Rural Areas Reference Guide Accessibility Standards MIXED TRAFFIC FACILITIES Yield Roadway Bicycle Boulevard Advisory Shoulder VISUALLY SEPARATED FACILITIES Paved Shoulder Bike Lane Pedestrian Lane KEY NETWORK OPPORTUNITIES Traffic Calming School Connections Multimodal Main Streets Bridges Access to Public Lands PHYSICALLY SEPARATED FACILITIES Shared Use Path Sidepath Sidewalk Separated Bike Lane PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Transportation Planning Process Steps in the Planning Process Key Products 4

CASE STUDIES SIDEPATH ENHANCED SHOULDER High School Connections near schools should provide increased separation of walking and biking facilities that are more appropriate for younger users. Population Centers Bus Stop Rural cores should support walking and biking on main commercial corridors and main streets. As the street transitions out of the core area, the facility design that accommodates people walking and biking should change. BICYCLE BOULEVARD Bus Stop BIKE LANE Rural Core State Highway ENHANCED SHOULDER Bus Stop BICYCLE BOULEVARD Grocery Store Crossing Improvement State Road Cul-de-Sac Crossing Improvemen Cul-de-Sac SIDEPATH LINKAGE SHARED USE PATH Shared Use Path Connections BICYCLE BOULEVARD Adjacent roadways or shared use paths may complement the transportation function of a primary roadway. Some facilities may only span short distances to provide connections and fill gaps along a greater network or facility corridor. Transitions between facility types are important and should not be overlooked. 5

SMALL TOWN AND RURAL MULTIMODAL NETWORKS GUIDE Bridge Treatments DECORAH, IA Population 8,127 Bridges are critical connections in any transportation network. Due to the high cost of bridge replacement or upgrades and the various existing and constrained bridge designs that exist, it is not always possible to have continuity in design approaches for multimodal facilities on bridges. ON DECK SIDEPATH ADVISORY SHOULDERS 6

Multimodal Main Streets GALENA, IL Population 3,429 A traditional main street is designed with street-fronting land uses, slow travel speeds, and pedestrian-oriented features, and is important for a community s commercial, civic, and sometimes historical identity. The STAR Guide elaborates on initial guidance from the ITE Walkable Urban Thoroughfares Guide (2010), showing how to combine multiple treatments to create a truly customized, multimodal main street in communities of varying sizes. ANGLED PARKING CHICANE MEDIAN AND SEPARATED BIKE LANES 7

How to Get the Guide? The Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks Guide was published in early 2017. The guide is be free to download on the FHWA publications page. An interactive online edition is available at ruraldesignguide.com. Please contact Paul Wojciechowski of Alta Planning + Design at paulw@altaplanning.com or at 314.952.8570 to learn more about how this guide may help you improve your region or community. Funding for the FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks document is provided in part by the Center for Prevention at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota and the Federal Highway Administration.