TRANSIT for A STRoNGER ECoNoMY

Similar documents
Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Bottineau Transitway Health Impact Assessment Summary

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

Sustainable Transportation Planning in the Portland Region

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

PEOPLE ARE PEDESTRIANS BY DESIGN JOIN THE MOVEMENT AT

Introduction Overview This document summarizes the Gateway Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit (Gold Line BRT) health impact assessment (HIA) process and reco

Corridor Management Committee. October 1, 2015

Information Item. Transit and TDM Projects. Range of 22%-32% of Funds. Range of $31.58-$45.94 M

Transportation Day at the Capitol. Charlie Zelle Commissioner, MnDOT Feb. 16, 2017

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Fiscal Year Budget Overview

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

MULTIMODAL PLANNING Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP)

Cedar Avenue Transitway/ METRO Red Line Implementation Plan Update. Metropolitan Transportation Committee July 27, 2015

phoenix regional bike share program sponsorship

Complete Streets Policies in Charlotte

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Highway 169 Mobility Study Policy Advisory Committee Meeting #4 Meeting Record

Dear City Council Members,

Enhancing Return on Investment for MnPASS Express Lanes

Transportation Authority of Marin Renew Existing ½-cent Transportation Sales Tax

Planning for Better Bikeway Maintenance Center for Transportation Studies Research Conference

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

Community Engagement Process

Sidewalkology A Path to Solving San Antonio s Sidewalk Problem

What is Going on with Complete Streets

Highway 169 Mobility Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #9 Meeting Record

North Coast Corridor:

Corridor Management Committee. February 11, 2016

Highway 169 Mobility Study Policy Advisory Committee Meeting #5 Meeting Record

Regional Council of Mayors. Presented by The American Heart Association and the Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota May 9, 2016

West Broadway Transit Study

Managed Lanes: A National Perspective Managed Lane Strategies

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan A-76

Section 9. Implementation

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Detroiters need to be able to conveniently and reliably get to work, school, church, stores, and parks.

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

4 Ridership Growth Study

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com


Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

DRAFT REPORT City of Hopkins Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. - Background FINAL DRAFT 03/11/13

Multi-Modal Transportation Assessment and Development Strategy. January 13, 2014 Madison County Commission Meeting

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 NO: C012 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 22, 2006

York Region Population and Employment Growth

TxDOT Bicycle Tourism Trails Study Update. April 2017 BAC Meeting April 10, 2017

POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Philip Schaffner Minnesota Department of Transportation October 22, 2013

Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) San Francisco Environment Commission Policy Committee

Building a Liveable Ottawa 2031 Backgrounder 4: Kanata/Stittsville

TAMPA BAY EXPRESS (TBX)

the Chicago Streetcar

How To Encourage More Efficient Transportation in Brazilian Cities

CSS and Complete Streets Partnering with Mn/DOT for Complete Streets. Scott Bradley Director of CSS April 27, 2010 CTS Research Conference

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Agenda Wednesday June 24, 2015, 6:00 8:00 pm East Side Enterprise Center 804 Margaret Street, Saint Paul, MN 55106

Pedestrian and bicycle progress report

Vision Zero San Jose. Moving toward zero traffic deaths and providing safe streets for all

Public Consultation Centre

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

Impacts and opportunities: Results from a discussion of Cycles for Change s work in the Twin Cities metropolitan area

Building Target Field

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Shifting Gears for a Healthier City

Public Transport and Development: Making It Work

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

City of Atlanta-MARTA Sales Tax Referendum Draft Project List. Atlanta City Council Work Session May 19, 2016

Hennepin Avenue Reconstruction Washington Avenue to 12 th Street

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Fundamental Certainty

Seattle Transit Master Plan

Vision to Action Community Coalition February 14, 2014 Briefing

Shifting Gears for a Healthier City.

Project Narrative. Albuquerque, NM. July 31, 2015

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

Transcription:

TRANSIT for a STRONGER ECONOMY Transit for a Stronger Economy supports statewide transit funding legisltation HF 1044 & SF 927. The coalition unites unions, developers, people with disabilities, low-income and underserved communities, and active transportation, health, and environmental interests to promote funding for transit expansion this legislative session. Advocating Change Together (ACT) African Career, Education & Resource, Inc. AFL-CIO AFSCME Council 5 Alliance for Metropolitan Stability Alliance for Sustainability Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1005 American Heart Association American Lung Association in Minnesota Asian Economic Development Association Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota BlueGreen Alliance CWA Minnesota State Council Conservation Minnesota The Cornerstone Group Cycles for Change Envision Minnesota Episcopal Homes of Minnesota Fresh Energy Growth & Justice HIRE Minnesota Hope Community ISAIAH Jewish Community Action Local Initiatives Support Corporation Twin Cities Masjid An-Nur Minneapolis Bicycle Coalition Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Minnesota Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities Minnesota Environmental Partnership Minnesota Public Interest Research Group (MPIRG) Minnesota Public Transit Association Minnesota State Building & Construction Trades Council Minnesota Young Professionals Environmental Group Minnesotans for Healthy Kids Coalition MN350 National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Upper Midwest New American Academy Nice Ride Minnesota Project for Pride in Living Saint Paul Bicycle Coalition Schafer Richardson, Inc. SEIU Minnesota State Council Sheet Metal Workers Local #10 Sierra Club, North Star Chapter Summit Academy OIC Transit for Livable Communities United Food & Commercial Workers (UFCW) 1189 United Transportation Union YEA! MN, a program of the Will Steger Foundation

Twin Cities Metropolitan Region $300 million metro (3/4 cent sales tax in 7 metro counties) $125 m per year METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Expand and upgrade bus service High amenity rapid bus service on 12 high frequency routes.higher frequency, faster bus service to more locations, with longer service hours. $125 m per year COUNTIES TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT BOARD (CTIB) LRT/BRT/Rail Build out the regional system of transitways: 3 additional Light Rail Transit (LRT) lines, including Southwest, Bottineau, and an east Metro LRT line; Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) with dedicated lanes on 4 more highway corridors. $50 m per year LOCAL NEEDS Greater Minnesota $32 million (Motor Vehicle Sales Tax on Leased Vehicles) MnDOT Statewide / G.O. Bonding $9 m Met Council Bicycle, trail, and pedestrian infrastructure. $20.5 m Counties Sidewalks, bicycle routes, and ADA compliance projects. $20.5 m Cities Sidewalks, bicycle routes, and ADA compliance projects. 250 more bus routes across 64 operating systems to meet needs in existing systems and add service in counties and communities currently without transit service. $95 m G.O. bonding for metro area transitways. $8 m G.O. bonding for Greater Minnesota transit.

94 94 Coon Rapids ANOKA Mounds View Fridley T TI BO Columbia Heights 35W NE Lauderdale L AU INE BR AY W Falcon Heights D OA IE RV VE RI E AV 494 Saint Paul 35E THA WA HIA CK Rapid Bus UNFUNDED Light Rail Rapid Bus/Streetcar 94 Woodbury GATEWAY 694 WASHINGTON White Bear Lake LRT/BRT (mode TBD) West Saint Paul 7TH STREET RAMSEY Maplewood 35E Commuter Rail 35E Highway Bus Rapid Transit - BRT 36 SAINT PAUL UNION DEPOT ET RE ST FUNDED TWIN CITIES REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN H D Hastings LIN E RO Prepared by Transit for a Stronger Economy Coalition 030413 Rosemount RE Eagan 7T CENTRAL CORRIDOR HWY 36 BRT Roseville Shoreview W DAKOTA LAKE STREET Minneapolis BRT I35W BRT To Big Lake 694 Brooklyn Park Golden Valley MINNEAPOLIS INTERCHANGE 35W CENTRAL AVE CHICAGO/FREMONT Maple Grove EXPANDED BUS SERVICE New Hope 100 HENNEPIN E LIN St. Louis Park EST THW SOU Edina Bloomington SNELLING AVE More frequent bus service, longer hours (weekends too), and high-amenity rapid bus on 12 key routes (shown in green). MORE OPTIONS 394 BRT Minnetonka 494 Richfield AMERICAN BOULEVARD To Lakeville RUSH ROBERT STREET Expanded bicycle routes, better sidewalks, ADA-compliant connections, and other transitrelated improvements implemented by cities & counties. 394 CARVER Eden Prairie SCOTT NICOLLET AVE PENN AVE The lines depicted on this map are in various stages of planning and are subject to change. CEDAR NORTHSTAR I35W BRT IN CHICAGO/FREMONT EP NN HE

POLICY BRIEF Most Regions use Sales Tax to Support Transit A dedicated regional sales tax is the most common funding mechanism among metro regions similar to the Twin Cities. Metro Region San Francisco Sales Tax Dedicated to Transit 1.05% of 8.5% Atlanta 1% of 8% Transit for Livable Communities A non-profit organization, TLC works to transform Minnesota s transportation system to strengthen community, improve health and opportunity for all people, foster a sound economy, and protect our natural resources. 626 Selby Avenue Saint Paul, MN 55104 An analysis of tax rates indicates that the Minneapolis-Saint Paul region uses this revenue source at a much lower rate than the majority of peer regions. Most of our peer cities have levied 3 to 4 times the rate applied in the Twin Cities. The 0.25% sales tax rate in the Twin Cities raises nearly $100 million annually, and is used to fund the expansion and operation of the metro area transitways (i.e. light rail, commuter rail, bus rapid transit). In order to continue these programs and improve the Twin Cities regular and commuter bus system, additional tax revenue will be needed. Boston 1% of 6.25% Cleveland 1% of 7.75% Dallas 1% of 8.25% Denver 1% of 7.62% Houston 1% of 8.25% Seattle 0.9% of 9.5% San Jose 0.875% of 8.375% 651-767-0298 tlc@tlcminnesota.org www.tlcminnesota.org www.facebook.com/ tlcminnesota @tlcminnesota Oct 26, 2012 The Minneapolis-Saint Paul region has a number of revenue sources for transit. The largest source is the statewide motor vehicle sales tax (MVST), whose extreme volatility is demonstrated in the transit budget shortfalls of the past several years. Transit funding is also provided through state general fund appropriations, a small amount of regional and county property taxes, and fares. Saint Louis Salt Lake City Phoenix San Diego Mpls - Saint Paul 0.75% of 8.491% 0.6875% of 6.85% 0.566% of 9.3% 0.42% of 7.75% 0.25% of 7.75% For Sources, see reverse

POLICY BRIEF Most Regions use Sales Tax to Support Transit Sources Metro Region Atlanta Baltimore Boston Fund Sources for transit agency/amount of sales tax to transit http://www.itsmarta.com/uploadedfiles/about_marta/ Reports/2011%20CAFR%20Final%28web%29.pdf http://www.mdot.maryland.gov/office_of_finance/ TransportationFund.html http://www.mbta.com/uploadedfiles/about_the_t/ Financials/2010%20C%20and%20D% 20MAMassBayaFIN.pdf ; http://www.mbta.com/ uploadedfiles/about_the_t/financials/budget% 20Briefing%20FY%202011.pdf ; Total sales tax for the city and region https://etax.dor.ga.gov/salestax/salestaxrates/ LGS_2012_Jul_Rate_Chart.pdf http://business.marylandtaxes.com/taxinfo/salesanduse/ default.asp http://www.mass.gov/dor/individuals/taxpayer-help-andresources/tax-guides/salesuse-tax-guide.html Cleveland http://www.riderta.com/annual/2011/ ; http://tax.ohio.gov/divisions/tax_analysis/tax_data_series/ sales_and_use/documents/salestaxmapcolor.pdf Dallas http://www.dart.org/shareroot/debtdocuments/ DARTFinancialStatements2011.pdf http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/local/city.html Denver http://www.rtd-denver.com/pdf_files/ http://www.denvergov.org/motorvehicle/ Financial_Reports/2011Comprehensive_Annual_Financial_Repor TitlesandRegistrations/TitlesandRegistrations8/ tabid/391087/default.aspx t.pdf Detroit http://www.ci.detroit.mi.us/departmentsandagencies/ http://www.michigan.gov/taxes/0,1607,7-238-43529- DetroitDepartmentofTransportation/AboutUs.aspx 155505--,00.html Houston http://www.ridemetro.org/financialauditinformation/ Pdfs/2012/FY2011-annual-financial-report.pdf http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/local/city.html Mpls-ST.Paul http://www.metrocouncil.org/about/cafr2011.pdf http://www.revenue.state.mn.us/businesses/sut/ rate_charts/tax_rate_combinations_current.pdf Phoenix http://www.valleymetro.org/images/uploads/ lightrail_publications/fy-2012-operating-and-capital- Budget-and-Five-Year-Plan.pdf ; http://www.azdot.gov/ http://phoenix.about.com/library/blsalestaxrates.htm Inside_ADOT/FMS/PDF/rarf11.pdf Pittsburgh http://www.portauthority.org/paac/portals/ Capital/2012Budget/2012BudgetBook.pdf http://pittsburgh.about.com/od/taxes/a/pa_taxes.htm Portland http://trimet.org/pdfs/publications/2011-auditedfinancial-statements.pdf http://www.oregon.gov/dor/salestax.shtml St. Louis http://www.metrostlouis.org/libraries/ Annual_Financial_Reports/ FY_2011_Comprehensive_Annual_Financial_Report.pdf http://www.stlrcga.org/x495.xml Salt Lake City http://www.rideuta.com/uploads/mastercafr2011x.pdf ; http://tax.utah.gov/sales/rate/12q3combined.pdf http://le.utah.gov/audit/12_01rpt.pdf San Diego http://www.sdmts.com/mts/documents/cafr12-02- http://www.boe.ca.gov/cgi-bin/rates.cgi? 2011.pdf LETTER=S&LIST=CITY San Francisco http://www.bart.gov/docs/fy2011_financials.pdf http://www.boe.ca.gov/cgi-bin/rates.cgi? LETTER=S&LIST=CITY San Jose Seattle Washington DC http://www.vta.org/inside/investor/financial/ statements/2011_cafr.pdf http://www.soundtransit.org/documents/pdf/about/ financial/2012/adopted_2012_budget.pdf; http:// metro.kingcounty.gov/am/budget/revenue.html http://www.wmata.com/about_metro/docs/ CAFR_FY10.pdf http://www.boe.ca.gov/cgi-bin/rates.cgi? LETTER=S&LIST=CITY http://dor.wa.gov/docs/forms/excstx/locsalusetx/ localslsuseflyer_quarterly.pdf http://business.marylandtaxes.com/taxinfo/salesanduse/ default.asp ; http://www.taxrates.com/state-rates/ washington-dc/ http://www.tax.virginia.gov/site.cfm? alias=salesusetax

Greater Minnesota Transit 11.1 million riders per year. 70 counties have countywide service. 8 counties have municipal service only: Clearwater, Cass, Nicollet, Le Sueur, Rice, Blue Earth, Olmsted. 2 counties have no public transit service: Wilkin & Waseca. About the transit users 62% of Greater Minnesota transit users have household incomes of $20,000 or less. 51% do not have a driver s license. 86% ride at least twice a week. 50% ride at least five times a week. 33% are going to work. 20% are going to school. Sources: MnDOT Office of Transit; MnDOT Transit Report 2011 and Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan.

Current Projected Funding Levels 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 Service Hours 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000

Regional Transit System Return on Investment Assessment November 30, 2012

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Itasca Project has a key goal to advance a comprehensive and aligned transportation system. As a stakeholder in regional discussions around proposals for transit investment, Itasca s transportation task force sought to understand what is the expected economic return on regional transit investments? Itasca commissioned Cambridge Systematics to assess the expected return from the region s proposed transit system. Working with a technical advisory committee of regional experts, the project team quantified and monetized how the regional transit build-out would impact travel times, travel time reliability, vehicle operating cost, safety, emissions, shippers and logistics costs, and road pavement condition. Itasca s transportation task force posed three questions: 1) A built-out regional transit system would require substantial investment. What would be the return on that investment? Answer: Between $6.6 and $10.1 billion in direct benefits, on a $4.4 billion investment (benefits accrued 2030 2045). 2) Investments can be made more or less quickly. Would accelerating the buildout change the return on investment? Answer: The direct benefits would increase to between $10.8 16.5 billion, on a $5.3 billion investment (benefits accrued 2023 2045). 3) Many communities with developing transit systems experience more growth near transit stations. Would such expectations for regional growth change the return on investment? Answer: More community growth near transit stations would increase net benefits by another $2 4 billion (2030-2045). In addition to quantified and monetized impacts, the analysis quantified but did not monetize other regional impacts, such as regional accessibility to jobs. The analysis found that a regional transit system would enable local employers to access an additional 500,000 employees. Finally, the project team sought the views of human resources and facilities executives at regional employers, with respect to the role of a built-out transit system in accessing and attracting employees. Together, the results show that investment in a built-out regional transit system would create substantial value for the region.

3/19/13 Dear Minnesota State Legislators, Quality Bicycle Products is the nation s largest supplier of bicycle parts and accessories. Headquartered in Bloomington, MN, and with additional facilities in Odgen, UT and Harrisburg, PA, QBP employs about 700 people. A great majority of our employees either ride bicycles or depend on a daily multi-modal transit/bicycle commute to reach our facility. Because of our commitment to using bicycling and transit, and our ability to utilize these choices in the south Minneapolis/Bloomington area, we ve actually seen a 4.4% decrease in per member per month healthcare costs, during a time when nationally per member per month costs have increased by nearly 25%. In other words, our employees are not only saving money due to choices in how they commute to work, they re also healthier, which translates into decreasing QBP healthcare costs. In the future, we believe those cities who respond to the needs of residents and business owners by providing choices in transportation, and in accommodating bicycling, walking, and transit will benefit in terms of recruiting the best and brightest to live and work in their communities. Therefore, QBP is a strong supporter of HF 1044 and SF 927 and we urge our state legislators to pass this legislation for the benefit of all Minnesotans. Sincerely, Gary Sjoquist Advocacy Director p 952-941-9391 800-346-0004 f 800-346-0211 6400 West 105th Street Bloomington, MN 55438-2554 www.qbp.com