Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 1 / 6 Spring 2012 updated 1/27/2012

Similar documents
CE 535, Spring 2002 Preliminary Design Example 1 / 6

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Information for File # SEW

CHAPTER 6 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT

BASIC FREEWAY CAPACITY STUDIES Definitions

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

Vertical Alignment. Concepts of design & guidelines Computing elevations along vertical curves Designing vertical curves

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO OVER THE STRAIGHT RIVER DISTRICT 6 - RICE COUNTY

HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

Geometric Design Tables

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Components of a Barrage

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (13-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

STUDY PROCESS & SCHEDULE

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

GDOT Cross Section Elements. Course ID: GDOT PDH Credits

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

APPENDIX L: COST ESTIMATING TOOLS

Highway Capacity and LOS. Reading Assignment: pgs

Geometric design deals with the dimensioning of the elements of highways, such

LARIMER COUNTY: ENGINEERING DOUGLAS ROAD (CR 54)

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

MEMORANDUM. TNC Fisher Slough Final Design and Permitting Subject: DRAFT Technical Memorandum: Levee Emergency Spillway Design

Session 1. Pushover Analysis of a Torsionally Eccentric Cellular Abutment. Date 11/03/ PM 4 PM Eastern Time

GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION STREETS TABLE 1A CG-6 CURB AND GUTTER SECTION

US Route 24 Eastbound (Quincy Memorial Bridge) Over the Mississippi River

Bridge Failures in Alberta

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 4 OVER THE BEAVER RIVER ST. LOUIS COUNTY

Transportation Knowledge

To position power poles a safe distance from the road to minimise the likelihood of being accidentally hit by vehicles.

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 7 OVER THE SNAKE RIVER DISTRICT 1 - PINE COUNTY

Basic Freeways and Multilane Highways (LOS) CIVL 4162/6162

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Non-Motorized Overpass at SR 5/US1

Exam 2. Two-Lane Highway Capacity and LOS Analysis. Two-lane Highway Characteristics. LOS Considerations 10/24/2009

Driveway Design Criteria

Guidelines for Integrating Safety and Cost-Effectiveness into Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT PROPOSED CULVERT STRUCTURES SR 194, SECTION 10

Summary of HEC 18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges FHWA NHI Should really follow HEC 18, but this summary will get you the main points.

Washington State Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects. Casey Kramer, PE WSDOT State Hydraulics Engineer

PENNDRAIN.rep. HEC-RAS Version May 2005 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California

SECTION 1A NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE GEOMETRIC DESIGN

Introduction to Roadway Design

Existing conditions of each bridge and repair plan are presented in Table

Section 4 Basic Geometric Design Elements

7th Street Bridge Project. Public Presentation February 24, :30pm-8pm

Figure 1: Graphical definitions of superelevation in terms for a two lane roadway.

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO B WABASHA STREET SOUTH BOUND (MASA 235 SB)

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO MSAS 123 (2 ND AVE. SW) OVER THE CANNON RIVER CITY OF FARIBAULT, RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY

SECTION VII ROADWAY AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application

SIGN PLACEMENT-ELEVATION VIEW: FREEWAY (FORESLOPE) ROADSIDE SIGN LOCATIONS & SUPPORT SPACING MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MIN.

Item 404 Driving Piling

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

Page 2D-10 Added the following language at the end of the paragraph under REFINING HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT ; See Chapter 2A, Section 2A-6.

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

BARRIER OFFSET 0" A 6" 6" A 12" 12" A 26" A 26" 3A OR 4A L OR S * ** L OR S L OR S

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 002 EMORANNO. 001

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS ON PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES:

ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY. Contract #2 Construction Scope. April 18th-19th 2018

section 4 Existing Conditions, Issues, and Options

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

200 Horizontal and Vertical Design. Table of Contents

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY

Trans-Canada Highway 1 RW Bruhn Bridge Replacement

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION

Roadway Design Manual

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA FOR CULVERTS

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

An International Experience on the Safety Performance of 2+1 cross-section. Basil Psarianos Nat l Techn. Univ. Athens, Greece

By: CHE ROS ISMAIL PROF DR MOHD ROSLI HAININ DR HARYATI YAACOB DR SITTI ASMAH HASSAN JGP-FKA, UTM

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

Outlet Structures T-12

Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA

TRAFFIC SOUND EVALUATION PROCEDURES

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

Work Zone Traffic Safety

Perched Box Caisson Overview. January 2014

Great Lakes Stream Crossing Inventory Instructions

2009 PE Review Course Traffic! Part 1: HCM. Shawn Leight, P.E., PTOE, PTP Crawford Bunte Brammeier Washington University

(HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN -1)

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

General Information for Culvert Design

Transcription:

Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 1 / 6 Perform a preliminary design for a bridge on a state highway over a large creek in rural Alabama. Produce a construction layout drawing showing profile and plan views of the bridge and approach embankments. Traffic Information. This information is used to calculate the number of lanes and the bridge width. These calculations are frequently performed by a transportation engineer. Rural location, flat terrain ADT = 5000 veh/day (2 way) % trucks = 5% (reasonable for rural area; I20/59 has 30% trucks, one of the highest in the state, for comparison) Functional Class of highway = major collector growth rate = 3% Hydraulic Information. This information is used to calculate the minimum required waterway opening (in square feet). design flood = 50 year flood (this is a state route; 25 yr flood may be used for small county roads) Q_50 (flow rate for 50 yr flood) = 25,000 cfs WSE_50 (water surface elevation for 50 yr flood) = 245 ft Streambed is coarse sand Stream Profile This information is from a survey along the road/bridge centerline. 0+00 250 4+00 240 6+00 230 7+00 210 8+00 230 10+00 240 14+00 250 Design Requirements: Design for Level of Service (LOS) C. No barge traffic on waterway.

Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 2 / 6 1. Determine Bridge Width ADT 4,000 veh/day average daily traffic % trucks 5% E T 1.5 equivalent cars per truck (1.7, 4 and 8 for freeways) use 1.5 for level terrain 3.0 for rolling terrain 6.0 for Mountainous terrain ADT adjusted for truck traffic = ADT x (1 %_trucks + %_trucks x E T ) = 5,125 growth rate 3% typically varies between 1% and 5%, depending on local economy, etc. design year 20 yrs into the future ADT in 20 years = ADT x (1 + growth_rate) 20 = 9,256 vh/day, 2 way peak volume factor (PVF) = 0.15 rural: 0.12 to 0.18 suburban: 0.10 to 0.15 urban: 0.08 to 0.12 Design Hourly Volume (DHV) = ADT x peak_volume_factor = 1,111 vh/hr, 2 way Desired_LOS C Desired Level of Service ("C" is typical) For LOS C, Allowable_DHV = 1200 vh/hr for two lanes, 2 way traffic (see LOS Characteristics handout) Lane Width = 12ft Shoulder Width = 8 ft Min. Bridge Width = 2 x 12ft + 2 x 8ft + 2 x 1.3 ft (Jersey barrier rail) = 42.6 ft ALDOT has 44ft wide standard design shoulder width = 44ft 24ft 2.6ft) / 2 = 8.7 ft Thefore, Use 2 traffic lanes Use 44 ft wide bridge, out to out

Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 3 / 6 2. Calculate Bridge Low Steel Elevation low steel = lowest part of superstructure elevation of low steel must be > 16ft above under road for grade separations (17ft is better) > 2ft above WSE_50 for stream crossings > navigation requirement for rivers with barge traffic (set by Coast Guard) Elevation of low steel = 245ft + 2 ft, Elevation of low steel = 247 ft 3. Calculate Min. Waterway Opening (A_50_min) V max = 4 pfs for a streambed of course sand (see table below) A_50_min = Q_50 / V max = 25,000 cfs / 4 fps A_50_min = 6,250 sf V max is usually specified by someone knowledgeable in bridge hydraulics and scour. In Alabama, an ALDOT hydrologist usually visits the site and supplies V max. Typical values from the Army Corps of Engineers for various soil types are shown below. Streambed Material Max. Permissble Velocity, fps fine sand 2 coarse sand 4 fine gravel 6 sandy silt 2 silty clay 3.5 clay 6 soft shale 3.5 soft sandstone 8 other sedimentary 10 hard rock (igneous or hard metamorphic) 20 From hand drawn sketch of stream cross section, A_50_natural 9,900 sf, OK (from AutoCAD drawing, A_50_nat = 10,000 sf)

Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 4 / 6 4. Locate Abutments (CL of bearings) Use 2:1 foreslope (in the longitudinal direction at the abutments) Try #1: Try Abutment 1 bearing at Sta 5+00, Elev 247 (low steel elevation) And Abutment 2 at Sta 9+00, Elev 247, From hand drawn drawing: A_50_prov d ~= 6800 sf From geometry using equation below: A_50_prov d = 7,190 sf Area of a closed shape = 1 2 n i 1 ( x y i i 1 xi 1 yi ) A_50_prov d = 7,190 sf > 6,250 sf = A_50_min, OK, where point n is the same as point 1. Try #2: try moving abutments closer to minimize cost of bridge Abut. 1 at Sta 5+50, Abut. 2 at Sta 8+50, A_50_prov d = 5,490 sf, NG Use Try #1 A_50_prov d = 7237 sf 5. Select Superstructure Type & Pier Locations 400 ft long bridge Try spans of 130, 140, 130, all BT 72 (see ALDOT Estimated Bridge Costs Sheet) Station Elevation (top of bearing) Abut 1 5+00 247 Pier 2 6+30 247 Pier 3 7+70 247 Abut 2 9+00 247 Superstructure Depth = 6 Girder depth for BT 72 (ALDOT cost sheet) Assume buildup + slab = 1 thick Therefore road surface elevation = 245 + 2 + 6 + 1 Road Surface Elev = 254

Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 5 / 6 6. Estimate Construc tion Cost of Bridge & Embankments Bridge Cost: Deck Area = 400ft x 44ft = 17,600 sf Superstructure Type = Precast Concrete Girders, BT72 Max. Pier Ht = 23ft (from sketch) Cost/sf = $65/sf for BT72 with pier ht between 40 to 60 (AlDOT Estimated Bridge Cost Sheet) Note: Our max. pier height = 22 which is less than 40 60 typically used for BT72 girders. Should consider using more spans with shorter girders (e.g AASHTO Type III, max span = 80 ) Assume construction costs have increased at the rate of inflation Using data from the internet, average inflation rate between 2000 and 2012 = 2.7% Bridge Cost = 17,600sf x $65/sf x (1.027) 12 Es timated Bridge Cost = $1,575,000 Cost of Approach Embankments: ADT in Year 2032 = 9,300 veh/day Terrain = flat From Typical Cross Section handout: use 3:1 fill slope from Sta 0+00 to Sta 4+00 use 2:1 fill slope at abutment (use linear transition from 3:1 to 2:1 slopes between Sta 4+00 and Abut.) Intersection of ground and top of embankment (Elev 254 ft) is at Sta 160. Calculate side slope volumes for each of two sections: Section 1 Section 2 h_1, ft 0 14 h_2, ft 14 19 b_1, ft 0 42 b_2, ft 42 38 L, ft 560 100 V, cf 54,880 32,920 b_1 h_1 L b_2 h_2 V_side_slope 87,800 cf For 2 sides of embankment, Vsides = 175,600 cf

Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 6 / 6 Volume beneath road: road_width = 40 ft ( = 2 x (12 lane + 8 shoulder) Section 1 Section 2 V_road_section 156,800 66,000 cf V_road 222,800 cf Volume in front of abutment: h_fill_at centerline bearing = 12 ft Sta at toe of front slope = 526.7 ft Length of front fill = 526.7 ft 500 ft = 26.7 ft V_front_slope 7,000 cf Volume at corners: (between side slope and fore slope) Assume triangular base of width 19 ft x 2 and length 12 ft x 2 and height 19 ft Vcorner = 2900 cf V_2_corners = 5,800 cf Total Embankment Fill: Total Embankment Fill = 411,200 cf Volume Fill for Left Embankment = 15,200 cy Construction Cost of Embankments: Assume $7/cy for embankment fill (in 2012 dollars). Also assume the right side embankment is the save volume (due to symmetry). Cost of embankments = $7/cy x 15,200 cy/embankment x 2 embankments Cost of Embankments = $213,000 Total Cost of bridge + approach embankments = $1,575,000 + $213,000 Total Estimated Cost of bridge + approach embankments = $1,800,000