Traditional small house in context of the Finnish energy code EFEM arkitektkontor

Similar documents
HAP e-help. Obtaining Consistent Results Using HAP and the ASHRAE 62MZ Ventilation Rate Procedure Spreadsheet. Introduction

Results of Field Measurements and CONTAM Simulation. Building Science

B. Diagnostic Equipment Information 01 Number of Manometers Used to Measure Home Pressurization Manometer Make. Manometer Serial Number

market leading commercial and domestic ventilation with heat recovery Nilan VPM Active heat recovery and cooling (air/air)

B. Diagnostic Equipment Information 01 Number of Manometers Used to Measure Home Pressurization Manometer Make. Manometer Serial Number

Field Evaluation of ASTM E in Relation to Control Room Habitability Testing and Boundary Maintenance in Nuclear Power Plants.

REQUIREMENTS AND HAND-OVER DOCUMENTATION FOR ENERGY-OPTIMAL DEMAND-CONTROLLED VENTILATION

Andrew Rhodes. The Hilton Baltimore Convention Center Hotel

BIOME DESIGN TECHNICAL DATA

Ventilation of Small Multispan Greenhouse in Relation to the Window Openings Calculated with CFD

Air Leakage Test Report

AIR DIFFUSION INDUCTIVE MICRO-PERFORATED DUCTS

FIRE MODELLING OF ENERGY-EFFICIENT APARTMENT BUILDINGS Consideration of air-tightness and mechanical ventilation

INTERPRETATION IC OF ANSI/ASHRAE STANDARD VENTILATION FOR ACCEPTABLE INDOOR AIR QUALITY

Mechanical Technical Report 1 ASHRAE Standard 62.1 Ventilation Compliance Evaluation

The process of measuring air

Review of the Bulgarian legislation in the field of energy efficiency of buildings

MEASURING AIR FLOW. Ventilation (Outside Air) Calculations. Derive % of OA as part of total air flow using air temperatures:

Blue Whale Spa :- Site Preparation and Delivery

The system design must obey these constraints. The system is to have the minimum cost (capital plus operating) while meeting the constraints.

Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York

ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES FOUR-PIECE RESIDENTIAL

Breathing Buildings NVHR. Virtual Environment User Guide

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

FABI Ventilation and Thermal Details Coral Springs, FL. Joseph Lstiburek, Ph.D, P.Eng, ASHRAE Fellow. Adventures In Building Science

REPORT ON ENVELOPE AIR TIGHTNESS TESTING SPORTS HALL HMP LITTLEHEY CROW SPINNEY LANE PERRY HUNTINGDON PE28 0SR CLIENT: WATES CONSTRUCTION

Manual. NatVent IAQ office ventilation program NaVIAQ V1.3

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM MODIFICATIONS TO DEW POINT CONTROL PROCESS

EFFECTS OF EXTENDING AND EXPANDING ENERGY-EFFICIENCY TAX DEDUCTION FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS

Wholesale Electricity Price and Retail Requirements, and Natural Gas Price Forecasts. Michael Schilmoeller Power Committee Thursday January 8, 2009

Detecting points of unintentional ventilation

Blower Door Operation Manual

2005 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE (Part 1 of 3) MECH-1-A

Overview ASTATT2. Prepare building for air tightness. testing

AVEMS & UNICLIMA joint Position paper on Regulation (EU) No.1253/2014 Paris, June 8 th

Building Official's Guide to Duct Testing based on 2009 IECC

ARCHITECT INSTALLATION GUIDELINES FOR RESIDENTIAL TRITON INSTALLATIONS

CBRE Seminar. 30 th March Creating Shareholder Value. Budgeting Operational Expenses Commercial

Duration: 4 hours Type: self-learning 2h and class room lectures 2 hours. Dr.sc.ing. Anatolijs Borodiņecs

WEST ESSEX REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT HIGH SCHOOL ENERGY ASSESSMENT. for NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES CHA PROJECT NO

Postprint.

Air Terminal Devices for Every Application

Building and dwelling production

Sizing Enclosures for SCR Power Controllers

Gas Safety Management Policy

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON AIR EXCHANGE EFFICIENCY IN HOUSES WITH CENTRAL VENTILATION SYSTEMS

Building air tightness

Table of contents. I Drawings 33. A1 Design criteria 1 A1.1 Local thermal discomfort indices... 1

Computer Integrated Manufacturing (PLTW) TEKS/LINKS Student Objectives One Credit

CONFINED SPACE ENTRY WRITTEN PLAN

COST COMPARISON OF FSW AND MIG WELDED ALUMINIUM PANELS

Guidelines to the standard IEC60601

Scoreboard Operator s Instructions MPC Control

DEMOLITION - RECYCLING - BULK MATERIAL HANDLING - SOIL REMEDIATION - WASTE PROCESSING - RENTAL SPRAYCANNON DUST & ODOUR SUPPRESSION WE BEAT THE DUST!

COATINGS SPRAY GUIDE Acrylics (210, 211, 211HT, and 212)

Heat pumps for swimming pools

SEASONAL POOLS REVIEW AND STRATEGY

LindabSolus. Supply air beam. lindab we simplify construction

Understanding Swimming Pool Ventilation. Presented by Tom Sands Mobile: CPD003/v03tcs2016

AIR CONDITIONERS WA14**W SERIES

Domestic ventilation systems

TECHNICAL STANDARD L1. MEASURING AIR PERMEABILITY OF BUILDING ENVELOPES (DWELLINGS) October 2010 Issue

DESIGN OF AN EFFECTIVE LOW PRESSURE VAV AIR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

LESSONS IN LIFE, PERFORMANCE IN TENNIS MALLORCA

Manual of SF6 Comprehensive Tester

Sizing of extraction ventilation system and air leakage calculations for SR99 tunnel fire scenarios

SO CLEVER, SO QUIET, SO COOL

AMCA Certified Ratings Program. An Introduction to the. An AMCA International White Paper. January 2018

FSH1BG Series TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. FEATURES and BENEFITS. Ultra High Efficiency Heat Pump, Up to 19 SEER Residential System 2-5 Ton Capacities

Application Block Library Fan Control Optimization

CONTROL SOLUTIONS DESIGNED TO FIT RIGHT IN. Energy Control Technologies

AIR CONDITIONERS WA14 SERIES

The Art of Natural Ventilation Balancing Heat and Air Flows?

SUMMARY PROBLEMS CAUSED BY BACKFLOW IN PIPE SYSTEMS.

Keywords: Chilled beam, Thermal plume, Air diffusion, Draught risk

Understanding Hatchery Ventilation


How to Test Air Change Effectiveness

Thermal Conditions in a Simulated Office Environment with Convective and Radiant Cooling Systems

Overview ASTATT3. Carry out air tightness testing for single dwellings and other small buildings

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE PROJECT INTRODUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION NOISE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS...

CFD BENCHMARKING: HAMER HALL AUDITORIUM CASE STUDY

Outside Air Nonresidential HVAC Stakeholder Meeting #2 California Statewide Utility Codes and Standards Program

SCHEDULE OF RATES. For Electric Service in Allegheny and Beaver Counties. (For List of Communities Served, see Pages No. 4 and 5) Issued By

The Advancement of Pressure Independent Technology

SECTION TESTING ADJUSTING AND BALANCING FOR HVAC

SGN Natural Gas Postalised Exit Capacity Charges for the Gas to the West Area. 30th August 2016

Adaptability and Fault Tolerance

2014 Fishers Trail Count

Shared Resource Conservation Manager Program Report Washington State University Energy Program, March 2013

Space Pressurization: Concept and Practice ASHRAE Distinguished Lecture Series

J. DOUG PRUITT, Vice President ZACK BURKETT, III, Treasurer. Re: 29 CFR 1926 subpart AA - Confined Space in Construction Proposed Rule

Separation of Acetone-Water with Aspen HYSYS V8.0

AIRFLOW AND TEMPERATURE FIELD CALCULATIONS FOR WINTER SPORTS FACILITIES

COATINGS SPRAY GUIDE Urethane 520

TOWARDS A BIKE-FRIENDLY CANADA A National Cycling Strategy Overview

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

V. HUKKANEN OY. Product catalogue

2-port and 3-port valves PN 16

CFD Modeling of Thermal Manikin Heat Loss in a Comfort Evaluation Benchmark Test

Transcription:

Traditional small house in context of the Finnish energy code 2012 Equa Simulation Finland Oy Tech Lic Mika Vuolle May 29, 2011

2 Table of contents 1 Essential inputs and results... 3 1.1 Energy code compliance at year 2012... 3 1.2 Primary energy simulations... 3 1.3 Total heat loss calculation... 4 Appendix 1. Primary energy results for one floor house... 5 Appendix 2. Primary energy results for two floors house... 10

3 1 Essential inputs and results 1.1 Energy code compliance at year 2012 The aim of this work is to study if it is possible that traditional wooden single family house, which has natural ventilation system without heat recovery, could fulfill year 2012 energy code, which will come in force at 1 st of July at 2012. To show code compliance it has to fulfill annual primary energy requirement. All delivered energy carriers are multiplied by a primary energy factor and are all summed up. With natural ventilation system the fan energy would be saved but at the same time ventilation heating energy usage is higher due to missing heat recovery. The total heat loss of the building has another requirement, which should be fulfilled as well. The reference level of the heat loss is set with each component level values. For ventilation heat recovery the reference level of the annual energy efficiency is 45 %, which could be compensated with envelopment conduction and the air infiltration heat losses. The presented calculations are made according to given codes. The assumption is that the requirements for the outdoor air flows and air quality will be fulfilled without fan usage, ie. air flows are the input values of the calculations. 1.2 Primary energy simulations The simulations are made with IDA-Indoor Climate and Energy 4.0. The created geometries on top of DWGs are shown at figures 1 and 2. In the primary energy simulations the all U-values and air tightness of building are the reference values given in building code. The selected heating system is ground source heat pump with water borne under floor heating. COP of GSH is 3.0 to space heating and 2.3 for domestic hot water heating. The values are building code default values. Due to the high efficiency heating system primary energy requirements are fulfilled without the heat recovery. For one floor house primary energy requirement is 199 kwh/m 2 and the simulated result is 163 kwh/m 2. And for two floors house primary energy requirement is 162 kwh/m 2 and the simulated result is 144 kwh/m 2.

4 Figure 1.The IDA-ICE model for the one floor house. Figure 2 The IDA-ICE model for the two floors house. 1.3 Total heat loss calculation Without ventilation heat recovery the total heat loss of building becomes the limiting requirement. The primary energy requirement could be fulfilled with the reference U-values and air tightness of the envelopment, but in the total heat loss compensation calculation the passive house level U-values are needed to compensate the 45 % annual efficiency of the ventilation recovery. An example per building is described in the separate documents.

5 Appendix 1. Primary energy results for one floor house Delivered Energy Report Project Building q50=2 COP lämmitys=3 COP lkv =2,3 Model floor area 123.4 m 2 Customer Model volume 351.5 m 3 Created by mvuolle Model ground area 123.4 m 2 Location Helsinki Model envelope area 409.5 m 2 Climate file Helsinki 2012 Window/Envelope 3.3 % Case efem Average U-value 0.2787 W/(K m 2 ) Simulated 26.5.2011 17:28:32 Envelope area per Volume 1.165 m 2 /m 3 Delivered Energy Overview Delivered energy Primary energy kwh kwh/m 2 kwh kwh/m 2 Lighting, facility 865 7.0 1470 11.9 Cooling 155 1.3 263 2.1 HVAC aux 239 1.9 407 3.3 Heating 6534 53.0 11108 90.0 Domestic hot water 2140 17.3 3639 29.5 Total, Facility electric 9933 80.5 16887 136.8 Total 9933 80.5 16887 136.8 Equipment, tenant 1946 15.8 3308 26.8 Total, Tenant electric 1946 15.8 3308 26.8 Grand total 11879 96.3 20195 163.6

6 Monthly Delivered Energy Monthly Primary Energy

7 Facility electric Tenant electric Lighting, facility Cooling HVAC aux Heating Domestic hot water Equipment, tenant Month Prim. Prim. Prim. Prim. Prim. Prim. 1 73.5 124.9 0.0 0.0 20.3 34.5 1136.0 1931.2 181.8 309.1 165.3 281.0 2 66.3 112.8 0.0 0.0 18.4 31.2 992.2 1686.7 164.2 279.1 149.3 253.8 3 73.5 124.9 0.0 0.0 20.3 34.5 906.0 1540.2 181.8 309.1 165.3 281.0 4 71.1 120.8 0.2 0.3 19.7 33.4 500.1 850.2 175.9 299.0 159.9 271.8 5 73.5 124.9 9.5 16.1 20.3 34.5 171.7 291.9 181.8 309.1 165.3 281.0 6 71.1 120.8 22.8 38.7 19.7 33.4 58.5 99.4 175.9 299.0 159.9 271.8 7 73.5 124.9 67.1 114.1 20.3 34.5 5.0 8.5 181.8 309.1 165.3 281.0 8 73.5 124.9 54.9 93.3 20.3 34.5 51.5 87.5 181.8 309.1 165.3 281.0 9 71.1 120.8 0.4 0.7 19.7 33.4 223.9 380.6 175.9 299.0 159.9 271.8 10 73.5 124.9 0.0 0.0 20.3 34.5 567.3 964.4 181.8 309.1 165.3 281.0 11 71.1 120.8 0.0 0.0 19.7 33.4 872.8 1483.8 175.9 299.0 159.9 271.8 12 73.5 124.9 0.0 0.0 20.3 34.5 1049.0 1783.3 181.8 309.1 165.3 281.0 Total 864.8 1470.2 154.8 263.2 239.3 406.8 6533.9 11107.6 2140.4 3638.7 1946.0 3308.2

8 Systems Energy Project Building q50=2 COP lämmitys=3 COP lkv =2,3 Model floor area 123.4 m 2 Customer Model volume 351.5 m 3 Created by mvuolle Model ground area 123.4 m 2 Location Helsinki Model envelope area 409.5 m 2 Climate file Helsinki 2012 Window/Envelope 3.3 % Case efem Average U-value 0.2787 W/(K m 2 ) Simulated 26.5.2011 17:28:32 Envelope area per Volume 1.165 m 2 /m 3 Systems Energy kwh (sensible and latent) Month Zone heating Zone cooling AHU heating AHU cooling AHU heat recovery AHU cold recovery Humidification Fans Pumps Dom. hot water 1 3406.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 418.0 2 2975.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 377.6 3 2717.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 418.0 4 1500.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 404.6 5 514.8 28.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 418.0 6 175.3 68.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 404.6 7 15.0 201.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 418.0 8 154.3 164.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 418.0 9 671.4 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 404.6 10 1701.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 418.0 11 2617.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 404.6 12 3147.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 418.0 Total 19593.8 464.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 4922.0

9 Distribution Losses kwh Month Domestic hot water circuit Heating Cooling* Air ducts* 1 52.3 511.1 0.0 0.0 2 47.3 446.5 0.0 0.0 3 52.3 407.7 0.0 0.0 4 50.6 225.0 0.0 0.0 5 52.3 77.3 0.0 0.0 6 50.6 26.3 0.0 0.0 7 52.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 8 52.3 23.2 0.0 0.0 9 50.6 100.8 0.0 0.0 10 52.3 255.3 0.0 0.0 11 50.6 392.7 0.0 0.0 12 52.3 472.2 0.0 0.0 Total 616.3 2940.3 0.0 0.0 *positive loss when conduit is cooler than building

10 Appendix 2. Primary energy results for two floors house Delivered Energy Report Project Building q50=2 COP lämmitys=3 COP lkv =2,3 Model floor area 149.6 m 2 Customer Model volume 387.1 m 3 Created by mvuolle Model ground area 74.8 m 2 Location Helsinki Model envelope area 329.8 m 2 Climate file Helsinki 2012 Window/Envelope 5.0 % Case efem2floors Average U-value 0.2936 W/(K m 2 ) Simulated 29.5.2011 07:14:26 Envelope area per Volume 0.8518 m 2 /m 3 Delivered Energy Overview Delivered energy Primary energy kwh kwh/m 2 kwh kwh/m 2 Lighting, facility 1049 7.0 1783 11.9 Cooling 335 2.2 569 3.8 HVAC aux 290 1.9 493 3.3 Heating 6076 40.6 10330 69.0 Domestic hot water 2595 17.3 4412 29.5 Total, Facility electric 10345 69.1 17587 117.5 Total 10345 69.1 17587 117.5 Equipment, tenant 2360 15.8 4012 26.8 Total, Tenant electric 2360 15.8 4012 26.8 Grand total 12705 84.9 21599 144.4

11 Monthly Delivered Energy Monthly Primary Energy

12 Facility electric Tenant electric Lighting, facility Cooling HVAC aux Heating Domestic hot water Equipment, tenant Month Prim. Prim. Prim. Prim. Prim. Prim. 1 89.1 151.4 0.0 0.0 24.6 41.9 1098.0 1866.6 220.4 374.7 200.4 340.7 2 80.4 136.7 0.0 0.0 22.3 37.8 951.8 1618.1 199.1 338.5 181.0 307.7 3 89.1 151.4 0.0 0.0 24.6 41.9 848.8 1443.0 220.4 374.7 200.4 340.7 4 86.2 146.5 5.6 9.6 23.9 40.5 437.2 743.2 213.3 362.6 194.0 329.8 5 89.1 151.4 35.8 60.9 24.6 41.9 134.4 228.5 220.4 374.7 200.4 340.7 6 86.2 146.5 64.2 109.2 23.9 40.5 39.4 67.0 213.3 362.6 194.0 329.8 7 89.1 151.4 128.4 218.3 24.6 41.9 0.6 1.1 220.4 374.7 200.4 340.7 8 89.1 151.4 90.4 153.7 24.6 41.9 32.9 55.9 220.4 374.7 200.4 340.7 9 86.2 146.5 10.2 17.3 23.9 40.5 176.5 300.1 213.3 362.6 194.0 329.8 10 89.1 151.4 0.2 0.3 24.6 41.9 515.5 876.4 220.4 374.7 200.4 340.7 11 86.2 146.5 0.0 0.0 23.9 40.5 831.3 1413.2 213.3 362.6 194.0 329.8 12 89.1 151.4 0.0 0.0 24.6 41.9 1010.0 1717.0 220.4 374.7 200.4 340.7 Total 1048.6 1782.6 334.9 569.3 290.1 493.2 6076.5 10330.0 2595.1 4411.7 2359.8 4011.7

13 Systems Energy Project Building q50=2 COP lämmitys=3 COP lkv =2,3 Model floor area 149.6 m 2 Customer Model volume 387.1 m 3 Created by mvuolle Model ground area 74.8 m 2 Location Helsinki Model envelope area 329.8 m 2 Climate file Helsinki 2012 Window/Envelope 5.0 % Case efem2floors Average U-value 0.2936 W/(K m 2 ) Simulated 29.5.2011 07:14:26 Envelope area per Volume 0.8518 m 2 /m 3 Systems Energy kwh (sensible and latent) Month Zone heating Zone cooling AHU heating AHU cooling AHU heat recovery AHU cold recovery Humidification Fans Pumps Dom. hot water 1 3294.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 506.9 2 2854.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 457.8 3 2545.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 506.9 4 1311.0 16.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 490.5 5 403.2 107.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 506.9 6 118.3 192.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 490.5 7 1.9 385.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 506.9 8 98.7 271.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 506.9 9 529.4 30.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 490.5 10 1546.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 506.9 11 2493.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 490.5 12 3030.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 506.9 Total 18224.5 1004.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 5968.1

14 Distribution Losses kwh Month Domestic hot water circuit Heating Cooling* Air ducts* 1 63.5 494.3 0.0 0.0 2 57.3 428.3 0.0 0.0 3 63.5 382.0 0.0 0.0 4 61.4 196.7 0.0 0.0 5 63.5 60.5 0.0 0.0 6 61.4 17.8 0.0 0.0 7 63.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 8 63.5 14.8 0.0 0.0 9 61.4 79.4 0.0 0.0 10 63.5 232.0 0.0 0.0 11 61.4 374.1 0.0 0.0 12 63.5 454.6 0.0 0.0 Total 747.1 2734.8 0.0 0.0 *positive loss when conduit is cooler than building