Road Improvement Consultations Huntingdon Road

Similar documents
Greater Cambridge Partnership Cambourne to Cambridge Better Bus Journeys: Phase One Summary Report of Consultation Findings

Churn Valley Cycle Group

TYPES OF CYCLING. Figure 1: Types of Cycling by Gender (Actual) Figure 2: Types of Cycling by Gender (%) 65% Chi-squared significance test results 65%

North West Non-Technical Summary of the Transport Assessment September 2011

FEEDBACK SURVEY #2: WHO PARTICIPATED

Consultation Report & Results August 2016

HISTON ROAD Have your say on better public transport, cycling and walking journeys

Route User Intercept Survey Report

February 2018 Mixed Topic Survey Results

Milton Road Bus Stop and Crossings Workshop WSP. 19th September 2017

Design Workshops Summary of all Feedback January 2017

GREATER CAMBRIDGE CITY DEAL THE CHISHOLM TRAIL

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

REPORT N O A1307 HAVERHILL TO CAMBRIDGE PREFERRED OPTIONS REPORT APPENDICES

Low Level Cycle Signals used as repeaters of the main traffic signals Appendices

MILTON ROAD CONSULTATION REPORT THE GREATER CAMBRIDGE CITY DEAL

Richmond, Adelaide and Simcoe Street Pilot Cycle Tracks. Public Consultation December 2014 to May 2015 Summary Report

Traffic Calming St. Clarens Avenue between Brandon Avenue and Davenport Road

DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY TRAVEL PLAN PROGRESS REPORT

Travel Plan Monitoring Report. Bourton View, Wellingborough - Residential

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Highway Infrastructure Manager

KLB Travel to School Survey - Summary Report

Cambridge South East Transport Study LLF 6 June 2018

The Montana Expression 2018: MT Residents Use of Fishing Access Sites & Public Lands and Waterways Values

South Terrace Pedestrian Safety and Streetscape Improvement: Community Engagement Summary

Halifax Regional Municipality 2016 Heads Up Halifax Post-Campaign Study Final Report

St. Augustine, FL Trends over Time

Sports Survey for Chinese Students

Marcus Jones, TRL. Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date

2013 NCAA Women s Lacrosse Rules Survey: Executive Summary

Stakeholder Consultation Survey Proposed Cycle Options on Napa Valley Avenue

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998

Cycle Routes. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 3/95 March Introduction. Implementation. Project aims. Design

Richmond, Adelaide and Simcoe Street Pilot Cycle Tracks. Special Report: Opinions of Property Representatives & Drivers

Life Transitions and Travel Behaviour Study. Job changes and home moves disrupt established commuting patterns

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

GREATER CAMBRIDGE CITY DEAL CROSS CITY CYCLING CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT

Pre-Plan Consultation Summary

CHURCH ROAD. Public consultation document TELL US YOUR VIEWS.

September 2017 I City of New Westminster

Liverpool Lime Street station engineering work. Knowledge and support for October 2017 improvement work November 2017

A27 Worthing and Lancing: facilities for walking, cycling, and horse riding [nonmotorised

Low Level Cycle Signals with an early release Appendices

Consultation on the future management. of the Old Football Pitches, Hyde Park. Consultation Report

May Canal Cordon Report 2017

Traffic Calming Rosemount Avenue, between Ralph Street and Queenslea Avenue

Sports Survey for Chinese Students

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey

RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

WESTERN ORBITAL BUS LINK CONSULTATION REPORT FINAL V1

A Strategy for Increasing Walking and Cycling

APPENDIX D. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN AWARENESS SURVEY (Completed by Zogby International)

Laurier Segregated Bike Lane Pilot Project July 2013 update

PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS

MILTON ROAD LLF PROJECT UPDATE

UWA Commuting Survey 2013

Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee. Restricted Roads (20mph Speed Limit) (Scotland) Bill: Key Themes Arising from the Online Survey

OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY

20mph in Edinburgh. Phil Noble

Loughborough University Travel Planning

LEA BRIDGE ROAD - A STREET FOR EVERYONE Public consultation document

CYCLING STRATEGY RESEARCH PUBLIC TELEPHONE SURVEY JANUARY HarGroup Management Consultants

Active Travel Towns Funding Scheme Project Proposal. Sligo. Sligo Local Authorities

Offaly Local Authorities Traffic Calming Policy April 2016

Satisfaction with Canada Line and Connecting Buses. Wave 2

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

2 Junction: Histon Road / Huntingdon Road / Victoria Road / Castle Street / Mount Pleasant (HHVCM)

Research. 20mph survey. Drivers opinions of 20mph speed limits

To: The results of these surveys have been analysed and are summarised within this Technical Note.

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented By: The Inavero Institute September 8, 2009

Light Rail Transit in North Central Calgary Open House and Workshop Summary. Summer 2013

CRACIUN RESEARCH. June 20, 2011 A M A R K E T R E S E A R C H S T CHA

Ottewell Traffic Shortcutting Pilot Project

Byron Avenue. Public Meeting. Thursday June 16, Traffic Calming Design Sherbourne Road to Island Park Drive

MCARTHUR AVENUE AS WE HEARD IT REPORT CYCLING LANES. City of Ottawa Transportation Services. Photo: istock

Heart of Hackbridge Consultation Feedback

25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07

Sandwell General Hospital Travel Plan 2014

Initial ideas for bus and cycle links

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009

Milton Road Project Update. Paul van de Bulk 30 January 2018

CSRM Modelling Summary Report for Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire Local Plans July 2013

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. General Manager, Transportation Services

Traffic Calming Policy

CAMBRIDGE SOUTH WEST PARK & RIDE

Cambridgeshire floating bus stops interaction analysis

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

RAA Member Panel. Roundabout Road Rules

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN

Submission on Clontarf to City Centre Cycle Route with signatures of 1,493 people

Online research with parents of year olds

Map 1 shows the two roads, and how they fit into the public transport network in and around Cambridge.

December 15, City of Ottawa Planning and Growth Management Branch 110 Laurier Ave. W., 4 th Floor Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1

Report on trends in mode share of vehicles and people crossing the Canal Cordon to 2013

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

SOMERSET ROAD SAFETY PARTNERSHIP CASUALTY REVIEW Working together to reduce casualties

Diagonal cycle crossing for signalised intersection. Axel Wilke ViaStrada Matthew Hinton Maunsell Daniel Newcombe Auckland City Council

Transcription:

Road Improvement Consultations Huntingdon Road General Summary: About You In total, 828 people responded to this consultation. 33.1% indicated they were a resident of Girton. 18.6% stated they were a resident of Castle ward, and 15.2% stated they lived on Huntingdon Road. The majority of those responding to the survey listed themselves as being employed/self employed 63.9%. A higher percentage of Castle ward respondents indicated they were retired than for all respondents (33.3% as compared to 21.6%), and for Girton residents slightly more recorded themselves as being in education (18.6% as compared to 11.8% overall). Considering age, more respondents indicated they were aged between 41 65 years than for any other range (44.2%). In keeping with the higher number of respondents being in education in Girton, a higher number were aged under 24 (15.3% as compared to 8.4%), and for Castle ward, more were aged over 65 years (35.1% as compared to 21.5% overall). Respondent use of Huntingdon Road Respondents were asked how they used Huntingdon Road as a pedestrian, cyclist, bus passenger or motorist. Multiple responses were allowed. More than three quarters of respondents indicated they ised the road as a cyclist, as the following chart outlines: Road use Percentage of respondents Pedestrian 57.3% Cyclist 77.8% Bus passenger 44.3% Motorist 73.2% This question was then brought into focus, with respondents being asked to identify which one of the four options was their most common road use. Overall, 55.4% of respondents indicated they use Huntingdon Road most often as a cyclist, with 30.3% indicated they more commonly use the road as a motorist. This was a similar picture for this indicating they were from Girton. For Castle ward the breakdown was slightly different, with 20.7% of respondents indicated they used the road most as a pedestrian. This was compared to 7.4% of all respondents. When asked whether they saw a need for improvements on Huntingdon Road, 74.5% agreed that there was, with 25.5% stating there was not. For Castle ward residents this agreement was slightly reduced (67.4%), whilst for Girton residents the percentage was fairly similar 72.3%.

Proposed cycle lane changes Respondents were then asked to review three options for cycle lane changes. This was a mandatory question so all 828 respondents completed it. These were: Option 1: A segregated cycle lane Option 2: A raised cycle lane Option 3: A mix of a segregated and raises cycle lane None of these Overall, views were fairly equally balanced. Option 1 cycle lane segregation was slightly more popular, as shown in the following table: Respondent option Percentage of respondents Option 1 31.0% Option 2 20.3% Option 3 23.6% None of the above 25.2% When looking at only those who agreed there was a need for improvements, the percentage who selected option one increased to 41.1%, whilst the number feeling none of the options given would suit decreased to 10.8%. An examination of the option selection by location demonstrated some difference between local option on the proposed alterations as compared to those further away. For those living on Huntingdon Road and for those within Castle ward, a higher percentage felt that none of the options were viable. Girton residents were also less in favour, but a slightly higher percentage did selection option 1 as shown in the table below. Residents from Cambridge City in general, and those further afield, were in much more favour of one of the options being taken forwards as opposed to not. Respondent option Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 None of the above Huntingdon Road 16.7% 20.6% 23.0% 39.7% Girton 30.4% 21.2% 21.2% 27.1% Castle ward 22.1% 24.7% 21.4% 31.8% Cambridge City resident 49.0% 13.5% 27.1% 10.3% Resident elsewhere (Cambridgeshire or beyond) 34.4% 22.4% 25.6% 17.6% Examining this by the question asking respondents to list ways they made use of Huntingdon Road (multiple choice), general opinion does still lean towards none of the options being viable. The following table shows the breakdown. Respondent road use Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 None of the above Pedestrian 24.9% 22.6% 22.4% 30.0% Cyclist 35.5% 18.0% 26.3% 20.2% Bus passenger 23.4% 22.3% 22.6% 31.6% Motorist 27.1% 22.1% 20.5% 30.2% Proposed bus stop changes

Respondents were then advised about proposed bus stop changes, and asked whether they supported the new layout at bus stops. Again this was a mandatory question so all 828 respondents completed it. The majority of people voted in favour of the proposed changes (59.5%), with 28.3% disagreeing and 12.2% being undecided. It should be noted these figures are very similar to the response breakdown for the sister survey for Hills Road. Examination by respondent location again the disparity between local and non local views is apparent, with much higher percentages of non local respondents being in support of the proposed bus stop changes. Respondent option Yes No Don t know Huntingdon Road 41.3% 44.4% 14.3% Girton 57.3% 32.1% 10.6% Castle ward 49.4% 31.8% 18.8% Cambridge City resident 82.6% 11.6% 5.8% Resident elsewhere (Cambridgeshire or beyond) 64.8% 21.6% 13.6% Examining this by the question asking respondents to list ways they made use of Huntingdon Road (multiple choice), preferences are still for the most part the same, with the majority in all groups being in support of the changes. Respondent road use Yes No Don t know Pedestrian 53.0% 33.3% 13.7% Cyclist 66.6% 22.0% 11.3% Bus passenger 50.4% 37.9% 11.7% Motorist 53.5% 32.8% 13.7%

APPENDIX 1: Charts Resident Location A resident of Huntingdon Road 126 A resident of Girton 274 A resident of Castle ward A resident elsewhere in the City 154 155 A resident elsewhere in Cambridgeshire 108 A resident elsewhere outside Cambridgeshire 18 Education / Employment In education (97) 11.8% Employed or self employed (526) 63.9% Retired (178) 21.6% Other Please state (22) 2.7% Age Range Under 24 (69) 8.4% 24 40 years (214) 25.9% 41 65 years (365) 44.2% Over 65 (177) 21.5% Do you often use Huntingdon Road as a Please tick as many as apply Pedestrian 474 Cyclist 644 Bus passenger 367 Motorist 606

Which are you most often? Pedestrian (58) 7.4% Cyclist (433) 55.4% Bus passenger (53) 6.8% Motorist (237) 30.3% Do you see a need for improvements on Huntingdon Road? Yes (586) 74.5% No (201) 25.5% Of the three options shown which is your preferred option? Option 1 (a segregated cycle lane) (256) 31.0% Option 2 (a raised cycle lane) (168) Option 3 (a mix of these two types of lane) (195) None of the above (208) 20.3% 23.6% 25.2% Do you support the new bus stop layout? Yes (493) 59.5% No (234) 28.3% Don't know (101) 12.2% APPENDIX 2: See separate document