DEER. Alaska DePartment of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation

Similar documents
DEER. Alaska DePartment of fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation

Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Performance Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July June IS 0 N

FURBEARERS. Alaska DePartment of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation

'MOOSE. Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation

furbearers MarY u. Hicks. Editor

021 Deer Management Unit

ELK. Alaska DePartment of fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation

SOUTH UNIMAK AND SHUMAGIN ISLANDS JUNE SALMON FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN, 2003

Furbearer Management Report of survey-inventory activities 1 July June 2000

Deer Management Unit 152

Deer Management Unit 252

Deer Management Unit 249

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Port Graham: Holdings of Limited Entry Permits, Sablefish Quota Shares, and Halibut Quota Shares Through 1998 and Data On Fishery Gross Earnings

MOUNTAIN GOAT Mary V. Hicks. Editor

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

By: Howard D. Tait Division of Biological Research Juneau, Alaska. February 23,

Deer Management Unit 349

SOUTHEASTERN DISTRICT MAINLAND (ALASKA PENINSULA AREA) SALMON MANAGEMENT PLAN, 1994

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

City of Ketchikan and Other Places Within the Ketchikan Gateway Borough:

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

DEER HUNT RESULTS ON ALABAMA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ANNUAL REPORT, CHRISTOPHER W. COOK STUDY LEADER MAY, 2006

Deer Management Unit 127

Bison Identification Guide and Quiz

Ketchikan and Other Nearby Places:

The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of sex, color, race, religion,

Deer Management Unit 255

ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SPORTFISHING IN ALASKA

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

Kodiak and Alaska Peninsula Commercial Dungeness Crab Fisheries, Report to the Alaska Board of Fisheries. Michael P. Ruccio.

STATE OF ALASKA Walter J. Hickel, Governor. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Carl L. Rosier, Commissioner

Deer Management Unit 122

DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME

Testing a Methodology for Estimating the Economic Significance of Saltwater Charter Fishing in Southeast Alaska

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Mountain Goat. Management Report. Carole HealY. Editor Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

Geographic Patterns of Seal Hunting in Southeast Alaska,

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

Kenai River Sockeye Escapement Goals. United Cook Inlet Drift Association

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Predator and Furbearer Management. SPECIES: Predatory and Furbearing Mammals

Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Restoration Project Final Report. Restoration Project Amendment Final Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

INFORMATIONAL LEAFLET NO. 2. Length-Width Relationships of Carapace. Measurements of the King Crab

2018 RANGE-WIDE STATUS OF BLACK-TAILED AND MULE DEER

Rangewide Status of Black-tailed and Mule Deer

Project on the evaluation of the human dimensions of the target audiences regarding Eastern wolves conservation in La Mauricie National Park of

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

2012 Kootenay-Boundary Mule Deer Management Plan: Outline and Background Information

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

Hunter Perceptions of Chronic Wasting Disease in Illinois

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

Fisheries Closures. Too many vacancies at the salmon hotels. Deborah Lyons Chinook Futures Coalition

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

2015 Florida Black Bear Hunt Summary Report

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT June 2016

Observations of Wolf and Deer during the 2015 Moose Survey

USDA APHIS WILDLIFE SERVICES ACTIVITIES SUMMARY REPORT 2013 WHITE-TAILED DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ST. CLAIR (September 2013)

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

A pheasant researcher notebook:

ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME STAFF COMMENTS INTERIOR REGION REGULATORY PROPOSALS ALASKA BOARD OF GAME MEETING FAIRBANKS, ALASKA FEBRUARY

FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE RED KING CRAB COMMERCIAL FISHERY IN BRISTOL BAY REGISTRATION AREA T, Rance Morrison

Deer Harvest Characteristics During Compound and Traditional Archery Hunts

Observations of Deer and Wolves during the 2017 Moose Survey

The 2009 Montana Wolf Hunting Season

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Status and Distribution of the Bobcat (Lynx rufus) in Illinois

The Incidence of Daytime Road Hunting During the Dog and No-Dog Deer Seasons in Mississippi: Comparing Recent Data to Historical Data

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Chronic Wasting Disease in Southeast Minnesota. Drs. Michelle Carstensen and Lou Cornicelli Preston Public Meeting December 18, 2018

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

Kootenay (Region 4) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document ARLIS Uniform Cover Page

Transcription:

Alaska DePartment of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Performance RePort of SurveY-InventorY Activities I JulY 1995-30 June 1996 DEER MarY U Hicks. Editor PAT COSTELLO Grant W-24-4 StudY 2.0 December 1996

STATE OF ALASKA Tony Knowles, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Frank Rue, Commissioner DIVISION OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION Wayne L. Regelin, Director Persons intending to cite this material should receive permission from the author(s) and/or the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Because most reports deal with preliminary results of continuing studies, conclusions are tentative and should be identified as such. Please give authors credit. Free copies of this report and other Division of Wildlife Conservation publications are available to the public. Please direct requests to our publications specialist. Mary Hicks Publications Specialist ADF &G, Wildlife Conservation P.O. Box 25526 Juneau, AK 99802 (907) 465-4190 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, age, sex, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. For information on alternative formats for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at (voice) 907-465-4120, (TDD) 1-800-478-3648, or FAX 907-586-6595. Any person who believes she/he has been discriminated against should write to ADF&G, PO Box 25526, Juneau, AK 99802-5526 or O.E.O., U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington DC 20240.

Project Title: Southeast Alaska Deer Population Management Overview: Deer are widely distributed in Southeast Alaska. Deer numbers are lowest on the mainland and highest on the Pacific Coast side of Baranof and Chichagof islands. Harvests have declined since the 1987 estimate of nearly 20,000 because of reduced hunter effort and some declining populations. Most deer populations peaked at or near all time highs in northern Southeastern in the late 1980s. Populations subsequently decreased in northern Southeast and seem to have stabilized but are slowly increasing on Kuiu, Kupreanof, and adjacent islands. Southern Southeast populations are stable. Southeast Alaska deer management provides deer for subsistence and personal use. Trophy hunting makes up a small fraction of total hunting effort. Viewing deer is of great interest to nonhunters and hunters alike; this use is accommodated by maintaining healthy populations. The greatest threat to deer in Southeast Alaska is large scale logging of prime habitats on US Forest Service (USPS) and private lands. Attempting to reduce these losses, Wildlife Conservation division staff spend much time working with timber managers. Nevertheless, existing habitat losses and scheduled cutting will inevitably result in smaller, less resilient deer populations. Project Location: Unit IA (5,000 mi) Ketchikan area including mainland areas draining into Behm and Portland Canals Project Objectives and Activities: Unit 2 (3,900 rni 2 ) Prince of Wales Island and adjacent islands south of Sumner Strait and west of Kashevarof Passage and Clarence Strait Maintain deer populations in excess of 45 deer per mi 2 of winter range (1.4 pellet groups per plot) in Unit IA and Unit 2. Monitor deer densities using pellet group surveys. Work Accomplished During the Project Segment Period: We completed deer pellet group surveys in 5 Value Comparison Units (VCUs) in Subunit la and 3 VCUs in Unit 2. We estimated deer harvest from regional questionnaires mailed to a random sample of deer hunters. Progress Meeting Project Objectives: Pellet group data indicated the 45 deer/mi 2 density objective was met in 2 of 8 sampled VCUs (VCU 561, Warm Chuck, and VCU 999, Gravina Island). Our lowest observed densities were at Duke Island (VCU 767), Alava Bay (VCU 769), and Sarheen Bay (VCU 549) where estimates ranged from 2-32 deer/mt Of the 8 VCUs sampled

during 1996, 4 were higher than when last sampled (VCUs 532, 748, 765, and 769), 3 were lower (VCUs 549, 561, and 999), and 1 was sampled for the first time during 1996 (VCU 767). Overall, deer densities in Unit 1A have increased slightly during the past year, while densities in Unit 2 have remained stable. Project Location: Unit 1B (3,000 rni 2 ) Southeast Mainland from Cape Fanshaw to Lemesurier Point Unit 3 (3,000 rni 2 ) All islands west of Unit 1B, north of Unit 2, south of the centerline of Frederick Sound, and east of the centerline of Chatham Strait Project Objectives and Activities: Increase populations on deer winter range ( <1,500 ft elevation) to 32 deer/mi 2, measured by a mean pellet density of 1.0 pellet group/20 m 2 plot. Work Accomplished During the Project Segment: Spring pellet group surveys were conducted at Conclusion Island and Woewodski, resulting in values of 1.45 and 2.25 pellet groups/plot, respectively. Harvest data for Unit 3 and Unit 1B were estimated from a regional questionnaire mailed to a random sample of deer harvest ticket holders. Progress Meeting Project Objectives: Both deer pellet surveys met project objectives and suggest an increase in deer densities. The Conclusion Island count more than doubled from the 1991 survey of.71 pellet group/plots. The Woewodski survey area was the highest ever recorded. Observations made while in the field on the Zaremba Island road system indicate deer are abundant and twinning is common. From preliminary results of the 1995-96 hunter questionnaire, we estimate hunters harvested 75 deer in Unit 1B for a 33% success rate and 866 deer in Unit 3 for a success rate of 58%. Project Location: Unit 1 C (7,600 rni 2 ) The Southeast Alaska mainland and the islands of Lynn Canal and Stephens Passage lying between Cape Fanshaw and the latitude of Eldred Rock, including Sullivan-Island and the drainages of Bemers Bay Project Objectives and Activities; Maintain population densities on Douglas, Lincoln, and Shelter islands at high levels as reflected by a mean pellet density of 2.00 pellet groups per plot. Monitor harvest through the use of an annual hunter questionnaire. Participate in public planning meetings. Participate in annual deer pellet survey. 2

Work Accomplished During the Project Segment Period: From preliminary harvest data from the hunter questionnaire, we estimated that 311 deer were taken within the unit; 67.5% of these were bucks. Hunter success from 1994 decreased from 36.4% to 21.2%, and hunters spent an average of 4.8 days to harvest each deer. Early season weather conditions limited hunter accessibility to the field, and low snowfall allowed deer to remain at higher elevations throughout the hunting season. Snowfall remained low throughout the winter and probably contributed to good winter survival. As a result, deer populations in the subunit probably increased. We completed pellet group surveys at Pt. Hilda and North Douglas on Douglas Island. At North Douglas 323 plots were measured in 3 transects with a mean of 0.97 pellet groups per plot. We examined 240 plots in 3 transects at Pt. Hilda; mean pellet density was 1.68 pellet groups per plot. Surveys were not made on Shelter and Lincoln islands. No planning meetings were held during the report period. Progress Meeting Project Objectives: This year's pellet group densities were higher than in the previous year. The lower pellet group density at North Douglas versus the Pt. Hilda area is consistent with historical surveys and may relate to habitat quality and/or increased hunt~r accessibility to the former area. Although densities increased over last year, these figures are below the objective of 2.00 pellet groups per plot. It is impossible to assess whether objectives are being met on Shelter or Lincoln islands since no plots were examined. Project Location: Unit 4 (5,800 rni 2 ) Admiralty, Baranof, Chichagof, and adjacent islands Project Objecti.ves and Activities: Maintain a population density capable of sustaining an average hunter kill of at least 1.5 deer, a minimum success rate of 1 deer killed per 4 days hunting, and a male deer harvest which is 60% of the total kill. Collect population data through fecal pellet surveys, use the hunter survey to determine harvest and effort information, and conduct deer mortality transects in key areas as needed. Work Accomplished During the Project Segment Period: Population trends were measured by pellet group count analysis. A survey questionnaire was mailed to a sample of harvest ticket holders to obtain deer hunter effort and success information. Hunters were asked to indicate hunting locations by harvest areas. Progress Meeting Project Objectives: According to the results of the 1995-96 hunter survey, all3 management objectives were achieved. The average kill was 1.9 deer per hunter (down from 2.5 deer in 1994-95) with a hunting effort of 2.7 days per deer, an increase from 2.0. Males composed 71.6% of the harvest compared with 68.1% in the previous season. Thirteen deer mortality transects were surveyed, and we located an average of 1.2 winter kill carcasses per mile of beach. 3

Project Location: Unit 5 (5,800 mi 2 ) Cape Fairweather to Icy Bay, eastern Gulf of Alaska coast. Project Objectives and Activities: No management objectives have been established for deer within Unit 5. Work Accomplished During the Project Segment Period: We monitored harvest by the regional mail questionnaire, which reported a hunter success rate of 30.0% and a kill of 7 bucks. Hunters spent an average of 2.3 days to harvest each deer. Pellet group surveys conducted on Knight Island and another group of small islands by the USFS indicated lower densities than the previous year. Mean pellet density on 379 plots was 0.60 pellet groups per plot on the smaller islands. No pellet groups were counted in 153 plots on Knight Island. Anecdotal evidence indicates wolves may be affecting deer numbers on the islands in Yakutat Bay. Since these are the only relatively snow-free habitats in the area, heavy predation pressure on the islands may well cause a significant decline in this introduced deer population. Progress Meeting Project Objectives: In the absence of objectives, no specific tasks were accomplished. Segment Period Project Costs: Personnel Operating Total Planned 52.5 67.4 119.9 Actual 52.5 67.4 119.9 Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 Submitted by: Bruce Dinneford Management Coordinator 4

Project Title: Project Location: Southcentral Alaska Deer Management Game Management Unit 6 (10,140 ml) Prince William Sound, north Gulf Coast Project Objectives: Maintain a deer population in Unit 6 that will sustain an annual harvest of 1500 deer, with a minimum annual harvest of 60% males and minimum hunter success rate of 50%. Work Accomplished During the Project Segment Period: We monitored hunting activities and harvest by a mail questionnaire. Preliminary results indicated the harvest was 1726, with males composing 71% of the harvest. Success rate was 56%, and successful hunters harvested an average of 2.5 deer. Montague Island provided 44% of the take, while Hawkins and Hinchinbrook islands produced 17% and 16%, respectively. We conducted pellet group surveys from 28 May through 6 June on Montague, Hinchinbrook, and Hawkins islands. Analysis of these data has not been completed. Progress Meeting Project Objectives: The population was able to sustain a harvest of 1500, and the proportion of males in the harvest exceeded 60%. The success rate was greater than 50%. All objectives were met. Project Location: Unit 8 (8,750 mi 2 ) Kodiak and adjacent islands Project Objective: Maintain a deer population that will sustain an annual harvest of at least 8000 deer. Work Accomplished During the Project Segment Period: We monitored hunting activities and harvest by a mail questionnaire. Preliminary results indicated the 1995 harvest was 7132 deer, with 81% males. Hunter success was 73%. Twenty-two percent of the harvest was from Afognak, Raspberry, and Shuyak islands; 68% of the harvest was from Kodiak and small adjacent islands. We surveyed winter mortality at 2 sites on Kodiak Island and at 1 site on Afognak Island. We found 37 carcasses in 15.5 miles of coastline (2.4 carcasses/mi), with 92% fawns. Additional surveys by US Fish and Wildlife Service indicated winter loss was light over most of Kodiak Island. Sea lion researchers stationed on Marmot Island reported finding 14 dead deer in February and March. Persistent snowfall was nearly absent until February and March, and deer were in above average condition all winter. Winter loss was the lightest in the past several years. Progress Meeting Project Objectives: Preliminary results from the hunter questionnaires indicated the harvest declined from 10,401 deer in 1994 to 7312 deer in 1995. Although the deer population trend was upward, the harvest declined to a level below the 8000 deer harvest objective. 5

Segment Period Project Costs: Planned Actual Difference Personnel 29.1 29.1 0.0 Operating 14.5 14.5 0.0 Total 43.6 43.6 0.0 Submitted by: Michael G. McDonald Assistant Management Coordinator 6

Alaska's Game Management Units OF 10 11,,. I

The Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Program consists of funds from a 10% to 11% manufacturer's excise tax collected from the sales of handguns, sporting rifles, shotguns, ammunition, and archery equipment. ~ The FederalAid program allots funds back to states through aformula based on each state's geographic area and number of paid hunting li- ~ cense holders.alaska receives amaximum 5% of revenues collected each ~ year. TheAlaska Department of Fish and Game uses federal aid funds to,-~q help restore, conserve, and manage wild birds and mammals to benefit the Rf.: public. These funds are also used to educate hunters to develop the skills, knowledge, and attitudes for responsible hunting. Seventy-five percent of the funds for this report are from Federal Aid.