Gulf of Alaska Keeper

Similar documents
Gulf of Alaska Keeper

Chris Pallister Gulf of Alaska Keeper. February 15, Guiding the landing craft to the beach in South Twin Bay for loading

Final Report on Removing MD from Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Beaches in Chris Pallister Gulf of Alaska Keeper.

Southern Montague Island 2012 Marine Debris Cleanup Final Report

Final Report on Removing MD from Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Beaches in Chris Pallister Gulf of Alaska Keeper.

Gulf of Alaska Keeper

Ninilchik Harbor Page 2 of 11

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

Cook Inlet pipeline crossing is about making the best choices

Keep it Clean Report 2018

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

Oceans Humans both depend on it and threaten it with their activities

Ketchikan Harbors Thomas Basin and Bar Point Harbor

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, 12270, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2012

Delaware Chapter Surfrider Foundation - Indian River Inlet Monitoring

RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE FARALLON PATROL V5 April 2014

Tsunamis. Tsunamis COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM TSUNAMIS

NYS Coastal Waters. Water Resources of NYS: THE NATURE of the COASTAL ZONE. NYS Coastal Waters. NYS Coastal Atlas. Coastal Zone Management 10/10/2014

Condition of Improvements 30 December 2014 Wrangell Harbors, Alaska (CWIS No , )

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2009

DALE HOLLOW LAKE TROOPER ISLAND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Proposal for Reservoir Fisheries Habitat Partnership (RFHP)

Injury and Recovery of Sea Otters and Harlequin Ducks following the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill: a Quarter-Century Perspective

NINGALOO MARINE DEBRIS REPORT

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) SOSC Updates and Planning Initiatives

Synthesis of marine debris modeling and observations: recent progress in understanding and applications

AD-A II~lllII I I 7

Controlling Coastal erosion

Long Beach Island Holgate Spit Little Egg Inlet Historical Evolution Introduction Longshore Transport Map, Survey and Photo Historic Sequence

COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS. 454 lecture 12

LORD HOWE ISLAND. INFORMATION FOR YACHTS & SMALL CRAFT VISITING LORD HOWE ISLAND WORLD HERITAGE AREA and LORD HOWE ISLAND MARINE PARK

PLAQUEMINES PARISH BARRIER ISLAND RESTORATION & SUSTAINABILITY. MVD/Gulf Coast Regional Dredging Meeting November 5, 2013

Coastal and marine recreation in New England is ingrained in the region s economic and

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Non Crude Marine Vessels Group Mission

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

County of Santa Barbara Permit Option Analysis Goleta Beach JULY 13, 2017

Shoreline Response to an Offshore Wave Screen, Blairgowrie Safe Boat Harbour, Victoria, Australia

REGION 2. Eysturoy (north)

Environmental Protection on the Gold Coast of Queensland, Australia. 1. What is the appeal of the Gold Coast to tourists?

DUNE STABILIZATION AND BEACH EROSION

Natural Bridges Field Trip Activity

Southeast Sustainable Salmon Fund Project Statement of Work

Cordova Harbor Page 2 of 9

ATLANTIC COUNTY 2006 to 2008

Australian Coastal Councils Conference

Short Synopsis. Activities

Figure 4, Photo mosaic taken on February 14 about an hour before sunset near low tide.

Beach profile surveys and morphological change, Otago Harbour entrance to Karitane May 2014 to June 2015

Coastal management has lagged behind the growth in population leading to problems with pollution

Chapter 12: Coasts (after a brief review of Tides)

Death by Plastic The Great Pacific Garbage Patch

Reading Material. Inshore oceanography, Anikouchine and Sternberg The World Ocean, Prentice-Hall

Shell Beaufort and Chukchi Sea Program Update

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Coastal Harbors and Waterways, NC (Shallow Draft Navigation) (O&M)

Pacific Ocean Division. Navigation Program Overview. Association of Pacific Ports 2016 Winter Conference Waikaloa, Hawaii.

Bering Sea Salmon Bycatch Update North Pacific Fishery Management Council, July 2017

Analyzing Surface Wind Fields Near Lower Cook Inlet And Kodiak Waters Using SAR

Integrated Pest Management Program Final Report

Marine Debris from Land to Sea: Holistic Characterization, Reduction and Education Efforts in New Hampshire

Bathing Water Profile - Carne (2017)

Kodiak and Alaska Peninsula Commercial Dungeness Crab Fisheries, Report to the Alaska Board of Fisheries. Michael P. Ruccio.

Recycling of Surplus Sand to Extend the Time Between Beach Fill Episodes

WIND SPEED LENGTH OF TIME WIND BLOWS (Duration) DISTANCE OVER WHICH IT BLOWS (Fetch)

Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project FERC No Appendix C. Derelict Gear Monitoring Plan

I. Project Title: Soldotna Creek Northern Pike Eradication Phase 1. II. Project Number: PCSRF Objective: HP&R

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT

Dauphin Island East End Beach and Barrier Island Restoration Project. Beau Buhring South Coast Engineers

CORPS FACTS. Harbor Dredging U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG

Juneau Douglas Harbor

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

UPPER COOK INLET COMMERCIAL HEFGUNG AND SMELT FISHERIES, 1998

La Quinta Channel Extension Port of Corpus Christi Ingleside, Texas. Mark Coyle

Appendix E Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis

Soft Designs for a Harsh Climate: Trends in Coastal Engineering

Spring in British Columbia s Great Bear Rainforest Edition. Explore the islands and beaches of the Great Bear Sea. Interact.

Economic Values of Sport, Personal Use, and Commercial Salmon Fishing in Upper Cook Inlet. (Executive Summary)

CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF COASTAL WETLANDS IN CALIFORNIA

WCMRC Technical Manual. Waste Management Tactics

Seasonal Summary. For The Great Lakes. Winter

Estimated on-the-ground start and end dates: 1 June October 2018

Marine Ecosystems. Aquatic Ecosystems Section 2

1-22. KETCHIKAN, ALASKA (Thomas and Bar Point Basins) (CWIS NOS & 87071) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2007

IBF LIST of warlike and high risk designations, with main applicable benefits (as of 16 th December 2015):

Exxon Valdez Runs Aground in March 2014, by The Associated Press

NOLS Alumni Trip Sea Kayaking Prince William Sound, Alaska July 23 29, 2017

Proposed Sewer & Water Rates. City of Placerville, California February 13, 2018

Redondo Beach Boat Launch Ramp Facility

Charlottetown Marine Terminal Pipeline Decommissioning Project Description

Name Date L.O: SWBAT explain what breezes, planetary winds, ocean currents & monsoons are.

Eastern Shore Islands Area of Interest Community Newsletter

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Lorain Harbor, Ohio

Comments and Requests for Additional Information. Regarding

consulting engineers and scientists

Another essential characteristic of boat channel geography is the form and spacing of channel

OFFSHORE PATROL VESSEL OPERATIONS

Point LaBarbe/McGulpin Point Response April 2 May 8, 2018 Regional Response Team 3 Meeting November, 2018

2009 APSC/SERVS Fishing Vessel Readiness Review Project Disclaimer

Coastal Harbors and Waterways, NC (Shallow Draft Navigation) (O&M)

Transcription:

Gulf of Alaska Keeper EVOSTC Harbor Protection and Marine Restoration Marine Debris Removal Grant Barren Islands Amendment By Chris Pallister Team Leader 907-345-0166 chris@goak.org September 10, 2013 1

Table of Contents Background Information 3-5 Proposed Barren Islands Debris Cleanup Narrative 6-9 Barren Island Charts 10-12 Barren Islands Debris FY 2014 Removal Budget 13 Barren Islands Debris Removal Budget Narrative 13-15 2

Background Information In early 2012, Gulf of Alaska Keeper (GoAK) commenced work on a multi-year marine debris cleanup, EVOSTC Project #12120116, Contract # IHP-12-057. During the summer of 2012, the EVOSTC-funded cleanup work focused on removing decades of built-up deposits of marine debris from southwest Prince William Sound (PWS) beaches. In 2013, pursuant to an amendment to the original contract, GoAK removed Japanese Tsunami Marine Debris (JTMD) from targeted shorelines in PWS and delayed the proposed Barren Islands cleanup by one year. The Chart 1 illustration on page 4 is of the shorelines proposed for the PWS JTMD cleanup in 2013 and the Chart 2 illustration on page 5 is of the PWS shorelines actually cleaned in 2013, including the southeast portion of Knight Island that is currently being cleaned. One of 16 loads of JMD removed from PWS in 2013 3

Chart 1. PWS shorelines proposed for 2013 cleanup 4

Chart 2. PWS shorelines cleaned during 2013 JTMD cleanup. Not shown on this chart, north and eastern Latouche Island and the southwest corner of Elrington Island have also been cleaned. Cleaned for EVOSTC Being Cleaned for EVOSTC Cleaned for Alaska Legislature As can be seen from a comparison between the two charts, the actual cleanup deviated somewhat from the proposed cleanup. That is because we only cleaned where we found significant tsunami debris deposits. 16 landing craft loads of debris comprising 640-cubic yards or over 64 tons of JTMD were removed from over 300 miles of PWS shoreline. A complete report on the 2013 JTMD cleanup will be submitted when the GoAK crew completes cleanup operations at the end of September. With the successful completion of the PWS JTMD cleanup, Gulf of Alaska Keeper proposes to turn cleanup focus once again upon the Barren Islands. 5

2014 Amended Barren Islands Marine Debris Removal Project Gulf of Alaska Keeper (GoAK) originally proposed this marine debris cleanup project as a portion of a multiyear marine debris cleanup proposal to the Trustee Council. That proposal was submitted and approved before the full extent of impacts from the March 2011 Japanese earthquake and tsunami became apparent in Alaska. In response to the influx of Styrofoam, urethane foam, and other Japanese tsunami marine debris (JTMD), GoAK submitted an amended proposal to the Trustee Council which delayed the Barren Island cleanup project one year. GoAK instead spent the 2013 season removing JTMD from impacted PWS shorelines. GoAK started the 2013 PWS JTMD cleanup May 8 and will finish cleaning beaches there toward the later part of September. While JTMD continued to wash up on PWS beaches during the winter of 2012/2013, and will likely continue to do so for years, the immediate threat to shorelines within PWS from the massive volume of foam tsunami debris has been substantially abated. GoAK has successfully removed most of the foam debris from inner PWS. However, Montague Island s Gulf of Alaska shoreline has an immense quantity of foam debris littering its beaches. Refloated debris from the northern three fifths of that shoreline still poses a direct threat to inner PWS beaches. GoAK received a grant from the Alaska Legislature to remove JTMD from high priority beaches. We are using part of the legislative grant to clean a small portion of the northeast Montague shoreline to prevent, as much as is possible, refloated debris from entering and again fouling inner PWS shorelines. In addition to the 2013 cleanup work on northeast Montague Island, a portion of the legislative funding will be used in the summer of 2014 to help with the Barren Islands cleanup project. GoAK has also been selected by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation as a contractor eligible to submit cleanup proposals for ADEC marine debris projects, including the projects supported with Japanese funds gifted to the U.S. for JTMD response. Funding GoAK obtains from ADEC, and with their approval, will first be applied to cleaning outer Montague Island, particularly the northern beaches that have the potential to send refloated debris into PWS. Barren Islands 2014 Marine Debris Project Narrative Now that shorelines within PWS have been cleared of JTMD, we propose removing marine debris from the Barren Islands during the summer of 2014. Since this proposal was originally submitted, two winters of JTMD accumulation have occurred on the Barrens. Consequently, there is significantly more debris, particularly tsunami related 6

foam debris. Small foam debris is labor intensive to remove and, because of that and the increased volume of debris, GoAK anticipates a 20% increase in the man hours necessary to complete this cleanup. However, we are not requesting an increase in funding from the Council for this project, but instead plan to utilize small teams of volunteers to assist with the job. GoAK s $366,800 request for EVOSTC funding for this project remains the same as in the original proposal. The Barren Islands are situated about 20 miles southwest of Elizabeth Island, at the southwest end of the Kenai Peninsula, across Kennedy Entrance. Southwest from the Barren Islands, it is about another 20 miles across Stevenson Entrance to Shuyak Island at the north end of the Kodiak Island archipelago. Ushagat Island is the western most and largest of the Barren Islands. Ushagat Island is about 7 miles east to west and 3.5 miles north to south. West and East Amatuli Islands, about 3 and 2-miles long respectively, are several miles to the east of Ushagat Island and are significantly smaller than Ushagat Island. Nord, Sud and Sugarloaf Island, between ½ and 1-mile long each are the three remaining major islands in the group, however there are numerous small unnamed islets in the area. The Barren Islands are part of the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge. They comprise an ecologically rich, but sensitive environment. MD cleanups in this area will be closely planned and coordinated with Refuge staff. GoAK has initiated permitting for the cleanup project. Ushagat Island has several long sections of shoreline uninterrupted by headlands that combined total approximately 5 miles in length. These beaches for the most part are heavily fouled by marine debris (MD), especially those beaches armored with drift logs. In those shoreline areas with lowlands beyond the beaches, particularly on the island s north side, MD has been driven far onshore. In some areas, large amounts of debris are found hundreds of yards beyond the tideline. Large quantities of MD have also washed over beach berms and been deposited in two sizable lakes on the island s north side. In addition to the stretches of low-profile continuous beach on Ushagat Island, there are approximately another 12 miles of rocky shoreline pocketed with numerous MD collector areas. Most of these discontinuous collector beaches are heavily fouled with MD. These shorelines will be quite difficult to clean because most of them will need to be accessed by skiff. Cleanup personnel will generally not be able to walk from one collector pocket to the next. The balance of the remaining 8 to 10 miles of coastline on Ushagat Island is steep with few debris-catchment areas and will need little cleanup effort. 7

Most of the low beaches on Ushagat Island have MD deposits nearly comparable to the massive MD deposits Gulf of Alaska Keeper removed from Gore Point, where 20 tons of plastic MD were removed from just a single third-of a-mile shoreline. That particular Gore Point beach took a 7-man professional cleanup crew, with the assistance of 5 volunteers, one month to clean. The beaches on Ushagat Island, and the other Barren Islands, are not quite as badly fouled as those at Gore Point, but they are more extensive and even more difficult to access in many circumstances. As such, cleaning shorelines in the Barren Islands will be very difficult and time consuming. We estimate that it will take a ten-person crew with rotating 6-person teams of volunteers 62 days to thoroughly clean the beaches in this area. The Barren Islands sit at a convergence of strong storms, currents, and tides. The Alaska Coastal Current approaches the islands from the east. Strong tidal currents from Cook Inlet and Shelikof Straits surge around the islands. Storms hit the islands in the summer cleanup season primarily from the southwest to the southeast, but can come from any quarter. There are only two good anchorages for cleanup support vessels, one each on the north sides of East and West Amatuli Islands. Generally, when not working on either East or West Amatuli Island, crew vessels will need to move to the lee side of an island for protection. The lack of secure anchorages will require a considerable amount of effort and time to move crews to beach work sites. Careful daily on-site attention to, and consideration of, actual and forecasted weather conditions will determine crew placement and work schedules. Marine debris will be collected by hand and smaller items placed in large garbage bags. The garbage bags and larger debris items will then be moved to accessible staging sites and placed in large Super Sacks. At the end of the season, the Super Sacks will be lifted by a helicopter onto a large barge anchored offshore. In a departure from the original proposal, the debris will likely then be transported out of Alaska along with debris collected on outer Montague Island and from other cleanup projects along the Gulf of Alaska. We are currently working with other cleanup groups to coordinate the debris transport effort. GoAK s plan for cleaning this sensitive area includes housing the cleanup crews on a 54-foot support vessel in order to limit human impact on the area. There will be no onshore camps in the Barren Islands. Workers will be shuttled to and from shore on a daily basis. All cleanup-generated waste and trash will be stored onboard and transferred to Homer for proper disposal. A 32-foot landing craft will be used for transferring MD from accessible beaches and providing logistical support for the project. A 45-foot landing craft will be used to transfer crew over longer distances to cleanup beaches and to move gear and debris. Four inflatable skiffs will also be used access beaches, ferry crew, and to collect and consolidate debris. 8

The shoreline in the Barren Islands is rocky, largely unprotected, and subject to strong currents. There are only a few areas where a large landing craft could approach the shore safely. For that reason, GoAK plans to use the same cleanup methodology successfully employed on the Gore Point cleanup. Crews, using only hand tools, will collect debris in garbage bags. A small landing craft can access many of the beaches and will be used to consolidate debris for later shipping. The garbage bags of MD will be moved to accessible locations for helicopter slinging. The garbage bags will be placed in Super Sacks which will be cached until the end of the cleanup season. A helicopter will then sling the Super Sacks of MD onto a large landing craft or barge. The MD will then be shipped to a recycler and/or landfill for disposal. All salvageable items, such as fishing floats, fuel drums, etc., will be given to commercial fishermen or any other entities that might want them. GoAK anticipates that between 80 and 100 tons of primarily plastic marine debris will be removed from between 20 and 25 miles of coastline in the Barren Islands over the duration of this project. The width of the shoreline cleaned will vary from approximately 25 yards on steeper beaches up to several hundred yards inland on the low profile, low elevation beaches. At least 2.6 million square yards of coastal habitat will be cleaned during this project and as much as 4.4 million square yards could be cleaned. In addition to the Barren Island professional cleanup effort, GoAK will have teams of volunteers working along with our crew. Two 6-man contingents of Japanese volunteers will work in the field with the GoAK crew for two weeks each. Other local volunteers will also join the cleanup team. They will assist cleanup efforts on northeast Montague Island and also on the Barren Island project. By using teams of volunteers for the Barren Islands project, we anticipate reducing the cleanup timeline by 6 days, from 80 days to 74 days, which will reduce crew costs. However, after experiencing the difficult access conditions for cleanup crews on the northeast end of Montague Island, conditions which are very similar to those on the Barren Islands, GoAK decided a larger and faster crew boat is necessary to safely transport crew and volunteers in the Barren Islands. Hence, the increase in vessel costs. GoAK will also take 8-10 volunteers and 3 donated vessels out for 7 days to re-clean 14 MD monitoring plots throughout PWS. Eight volunteers will also help clean 3 Gore Point monitoring beaches over a 6-day period. GoAK will also participate in an ongoing MD toxicity research project on Elizabeth Island at the southwest tip of the Kenai Peninsula. Three volunteers will spend two weeks traveling to and collecting samples from fish, water, and sediments in a coastal salmon rearing lake and outlet stream severely polluted by marine debris. 9

Barren Islands 2014 Project Charts Projected 2014 marine debris cleanup area 10

11

12

Barren Islands Cleanup FY 2014 Budget Budget Category (e.g. personnel, supplies, contractual, etc.) Personnel -CCF (public outreach) -Volunteer Cleanup -Volunteer Research EVOSTC Funds 1,50 Matching Contributions 92,25 8,60 Travel -Volunteer transport 1,30 Total Expense 102,35 Nature (cash or in-kind) And Source of Match Cash-EVOSTC In-kind-Volunteer labor In-kind-GoAK/UAA/WM labor In-kind-Volunteers Equipment -Vol. cleanup vessels -Super Sacks Supplies -Watermaker filters -Garbage bags -Volunteer food Contractual -Contract Crew - - -Work Vessels w/fuel -Debris Disposal -Liability Insurance -MD Monitoring leaders 00.0 69,30 296,00 1,30 103,00 5,25 108,25 50 90 5,12 150,00 2,70 13,00 8,00 3,50 6,52 In-kind - vessel owners In-kind - GoAK Cash-GoAK In-kind ALPAR In-kind - volunteers Cash AK Legislature Cash private donors Cash-EVOSTC Cash-EVOSTC Cash-private donors Cash-private donors Cash-Private donors 542,50 Accounting/Bookkeeping 2,00 2,00 Cash- GoAK Total 366,80 396,12 762,92 Barren Islands 2014 Removal Budget Narrative Gulf of Alaska Keeper (GoAK) proposes to expend over a 74-day project a total of $762,920 to remove marine debris from the Barren Islands coast. Of the total projected cost, $366,800 would be from EVOSTC funds and $396,120 from matching funds. The matching funds would be comprised of a $150,000 Alaska Legislature marine debris grant, $27,200 in private donations, $2,500 cash from GoAK, and $216,420 of in-kind donations. For the past 6 years, GoAK s cash donations have averaged approximately $25,000 and in-kind donations $225,000 for marine debris projects in the oil spill footprint area. 13

Personnel In past years GoAK organized and conducted large volunteer cleanups in the Exxon oil spill footprint area, primarily in PWS and the Gore Point region. Up to 100 volunteers with 12 vessels spent four days each season cleaning beaches. Now that the more accessible beaches have been cleaned and only difficult remote shoreline remains to be cleaned, GoAK has turned to utilizing small groups of volunteers that work with our crew for up to two weeks each. We will have volunteer groups with us through much of the 2014 season, two of them from Japan. In addition, each summer, GoAK uses 8 volunteers and 3 vessels to re-clean 14 marine debris monitoring sites in PWS and 3 at Gore Point. Volunteers and GoAK board members donate over 4500 hours to these projects annually, an in-kind donation worth $92,250. GoAK and researchers from the University of Alaska Anchorage and the College of Williams and Mary will also donate 420 field hours, an in-kind donation worth $8,610, to a marine debris toxicity research project centered on Elizabeth Island during the summer of 2014. $1,500 would be expended on CCF instructors for the CACS public outreach program. Travel Volunteers for the different GoAK marine debris projects pay their own transportation costs to and from the project departure point. Volunteers also pay Whittier tunnel fees and parking fees where they join GoAK vessels, an in-kind donation of $1,300 annually. Equipment In-kind donations Total contractual costs include an in-kind $88,000 donation of private vessel time and an in-kind $15,000 donation of charter vessel time. The Barren Islands cleanup project will require that debris be loaded into Super Sacks so that a helicopter can sling the debris from the beach onto an offshore barge or landing craft. GoAK will donate 350 Super Sacks to the project, an in-kind donation of $5,250. All other marine debris tools and equipment will be provided by GoAK. Supplies Water filtration supplies of $500 will be purchased by GoAK. Volunteers will provide their own food, an in-kind donation of $5,120. ALPAR will donate $900 worth of garbage bags 14

Contractual Cash In July 2013, GoAK received an Alaska Legislature grant of which $150,000 will be used for the Barren Islands cleanup project. The Alaska Legislature grant combined with the $366,800 requested from EVOSTC and $27,200 from private donors will pay for cleanup related insurance ($8,000); disposal costs ($13,000); pay for two individuals for 7 days to clean 14 marine debris monitoring beaches with 8 volunteers, collect the data and to produce the monitoring reports and analysis ($3,500); large vessel lease for 6 days to collect cached marine debris for disposal ($24,000); helicopter lease for two days to transfer debris from Barren Islands beaches to large vessel ($35,000); contract for 3 cleanup support vessels and 4 skiffs. The support vessels include a 45-foot landing craft for moving crews to work sites and hauling debris, a 32-foot landing craft for collecting and transferring debris to collection sites, a 54-foot crew quarter vessel, and also 4 12-foot inflatable skiffs with outboards for beach access, garbage transfer, and crew transport (all with fuel for $4,000 per day for 74 days=$296,000); cost of contract crew of 10 people to clean beaches in the Barren Islands ($3000 per day for 74 days=$222,000). Accounting/Bookkeeping GoAK will pay an accountant $2,000 to do the bookkeeping and accounting associated with this project. Indirect, Management, Travel and Profit There are no additional indirect, management, travel, or profit charges for the Barren Islands project. 15