TomTom South African Congestion Index

Similar documents
TomTom European Congestion Index

3 ROADWAYS 3.1 CMS ROADWAY NETWORK 3.2 TRAVEL-TIME-BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Roadway Travel Time Measures

Planning Daily Work Trip under Congested Abuja Keffi Road Corridor

Using GPS Data for Arterial Mobility Performance Measures

Appendix ELP El Paso, Texas 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Appendix LOU Louisville, Kentucky 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Mobility and Congestion

FACTS AND FIGURES: MAKING THE CASE FOR COMPLETE STREETS IN LEE COUNTY

Auckland Transport Monthly Indicators Report 2018/19

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. (A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)

Municipality of Sofia Traffic Master Plan. Intelligent Transport Systems Strategy Andrew Walsh

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

Appendix SEA Seattle, Washington 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Congestion Management Report

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Take the Bus. Project Proposal AUSTRALIA. Bus Industry Confederation. Take the Bus. Bus Australia Network WARTA. BusS. Bus & Coach Association SA

CONGESTED LOS ANGELES

KEEPING METRO TRAFFIC MOVING

The Future of All Electronic Tolling Brian Patno Raytheon ITS Texas October 26, 2012

3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION

Appendix PDX Portland, Oregon 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility Study Update

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

GIVING GEORGIANS A CHOICE TO KEEP MOVING

Appendix PIT Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

TOWARDS A BIKE-FRIENDLY CANADA A National Cycling Strategy Overview

Compression Study: City, State. City Convention & Visitors Bureau. Prepared for

A national cycling strategy for more and safer cycling

Appendix MSP Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

ROAD SAFETY RISK MAPPING USING STRUCTURED DATA

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

A Study on Weekend Travel Patterns by Individual Characteristics in the Seoul Metropolitan Area

Matt Dykstra PSU MGIS Program

Analysis of Run-Off-Road Crashes in Relation to Roadway Features and Driver Behavior

Where to from HERE: Mapping multimodal. in Australia


MULTIMODAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT

HD Traffic, IQ Routes and Map Share TomTom s latest technologies for premium navigation and traffic information

2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard. Scott Weber, Transportation Planner & Analyst James Winters, Regional Planner & Policy Analyst

An Assessment of Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from Proposed On Street Bikeways

FEASIBLE SOLUTIONS FOR REDUCING TRAFFIC FROM MEERAMAKKAM MOSQUE JUNCTION TO THOPAWANA TEMPLE AREA IN KANDY

RIGHT TURNS AT INTERSECTIONS: ARE THERE ALTERNATIVES?

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Coolest Cities Results Summary

95 Express Annual Operations Report: Fiscal Year

SUPERSTREETS IN TEXAS. ITS Texas Annual Meeting San Marcos, Texas Session 6A - Operations November 11, 2011

100 Most Congested Roadways in Texas

ROAD SAFETY DEVELOPMENT INDEX (RSDI)

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

Effects of Congestion and Travel Time Variability along Abuja -Keffi Corridor in Nigeria

Congestion Management Report

Introduction. Bus priority system. Objectives. Description. Measure title: City: Malmo Project: SMILE Measure number: 12.7

SAVE THE NATION ASSOCIATION (SNA)

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

The I-680 Southbound Express Lane

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Traffic Congestion in Houston. Presented by Bill King

Update June 2018 OUR 2017 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

OXFORDSHIRE & OXFORD CITY CONGESTION MONITORING 2015

AS91430: Cycleways Waiopehu College Year 13 Geography Matt Reeves

Hard Shoulder Running is a valuable tool July 14, Dean H. Gustafson, PE, PTOE State Operations Engineer VDOT Operations Division

Non-motorized Transportation Planning Resource Book Mayor s Task Force on Walking and Bicycling City of Lansing, Michigan Spring 2007 pg.

1. Introduction. 2. Survey Method. Volume 6 Issue 5, May Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY

Section Activity and instructions Skills Target year group(s) World Activity 1 Calculate stadium capacity and design your own stadium Cup venues

Investigating Commute Mode and Route Choice Variability in Jakarta using multi-day GPS Data

Instances of 1 Minute or Less Between Buses 4 5% 55% 3.9% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 2.9% 2.8% Sep- Sep 07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan- Jan 08 Feb- Feb 08 Mar-08

Procurement of Floating Car Data A National Strategy. Edoardo Felici

THE FUTURE OF CYCLING

395 Express Lanes Extension

Using Farecard Data to Suggest Cycling Policies in Singapore. Ashwani Kumar Viet Anh Nguyen Kwong Meng Teo Amedeo Odoni

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Traffic Impact Analysis

A national cycling strategy for more and safer cycling

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

National Capital Region Congestion Report

Congestion Reduction in Europe: Advancing Transport Efficiency. MG Tackling urban road congestion D3.4

Transit Ridership - Why the Decline and How to Increase. Hosted by the. Virginia Transit Association

MEASUREMENT OF RECURRING VERSUS NON-RECURRING CONGESTION

UNDERSTANDING WALKING NETWORKS TO ENABLE SMARTER CHOICES IN TRANSPORT PLANNING IN DUNDEE. Gillian Iversen Atkins

An Easier Commute. Learn how to use I-77 Express to save you time.

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

End of the motor car age: the evidence and what could follow

Child Road Injuries: Gauteng Status Quo Aliasgher Janmohammed (Ali)

Geometric and Trafc Conditions Summary

Performance Measure Summary - San Jose CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

RIVER CROSSINGS: EAST OF SILVERTOWN CROSSINGS

ESTIMATING TRAFFIC CONGESTION & LOS ON URBAN ROADS USING GPS DATA

Performance Measure Summary - Chicago IL-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Denver-Aurora CO. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Exceeding expectations: The growth of walking in Vancouver and creating a more walkable city in the future through EcoDensity

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR URBAN ITS

Mobileye Shield+ Collision Avoidance System Pilot Program

RESTRICTED ROADS (20 MPH SPEED LIMIT) (SCOTLAND) BILL. 1. Is reducing the speed limit to 20mph the best way of achieving the aims of the Bill?

Transcription:

TomTom South African Congestion Index

Disclaimer All copyrights, commercial rights, design rights, trademarks and other elements considered intellectual property that are published in this report are reserved by TomTom International B.V.. You are permitted to use the contents of this report in online, offline and social media and other publication channels for non-commercial purposes with clear reference to TomTom International B.V. as its main source. You are not permitted to modify, compile, adapt or use any part of this report in any way for commercial purposes without a written agreement from TomTom International B.V.. For more information please contact congestionindex@tomtom.com. 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 1

It is our mission to get drivers to their destinations faster, safer and greener. Over the years we have invested in new ideas and technologies with the aim of bringing significant benefits to drivers, businesses and society as a whole. In 2007 we started a groundbreaking initiative that helped us to understand how we could guide drivers in a better way. We set out to build a more precise view of traffic flow over the entire road network to enable us to give drivers more exact route information and arrival times. With the support of millions of TomTom customers we have captured anonymous travel time information in all the territories where we are active. Rather than relying on theoretical models, we are now able to understand real-life driving patterns by time of day, day of week, time of year and around special events. This initiative is unique in that we are able to capture, evaluate and redistribute vehicle-centric travel information on a global scale. Over the years we have built the world's largest database of historic travel times and the most detailed and accurate realtime traffic information available. Based on the insights we gained we have developed advanced routing technologies that help millions of drivers get to their destinations faster, safer and with lower emissions of greenhouse gases. Contrary to popular belief, there are often multiple ways to reach a destination and avoid traffic congestion. Finding the fastest route is a complex task. Now, thanks to advanced routing technologies, motorists can drive with dynamic navigation systems which quickly react and adjust routes to the ever changing traffic situations. By helping drivers to find a faster route we can also demonstrate that the total available capacity on the road network increases. If a small percentage of drivers uses different (and faster) routes, congestion can be alleviated across the entire road network, thereby benefitting all drivers. By offering a more accurate analysis of traffic flows, we help identify and pinpoint congestion trouble spots more effectively. And by routing traffic away from congested areas we can play a key role in easing congestion in cities and urban areas. Our historical archive of real travel times has paved the way for the creation of the the most accurate and comprehensive barometer of traffic congestion in major cities all over the world. 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 2

About the With the publication of the we are aiming to provide the general public, industry and policy makers with unique and unbiased information about congestion levels in urban areas *. The methodology that is used in this report compares travel times * during non-congested periods (free flow * ) with travel times * in peak hours *. The difference is expressed as a percentage increase in travel time *. We take into account local roads, arterials and highways. All data is based on actual GPS based measurements and for each city * the sample size is expressed in total number of measured miles for the period. As well as assigning and ranking the overall congestion levels of over 120 cities * on different continents, the report evaluates the congestion levels * in cities at different times of the day and on different days of the week. Individual city reports include more detailed information such as the most congested day *, time delay per year for commuters * and congestion levels on highways * and local roads. To download a copy of the report go to: www.tomtom.com/congestionindex. If you would like to know more about TomTom's trafflc solutions, please contact your local TomTom office or sales@tomtom.com. For questions or comments about this report, please contact us at congestionindex@tomtom.com. Note: words with a * are explained on the keywords page at the end of the report. 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 3

South Africa South Africa congestion level 25% 1 Johannesburg 2 Cape Town Top 3 - Increasing congestion Prev ious Increase in congestion C ongestion 0 4 8 12 16 C urrent Durban 16% 2 18% Cape Town 24% 1 25% Top 3 - Decreasing congestion Prev ious Decrease in congestion C ongestion 0 4 8 12 16 C urrent East Rand n 28% 2 26% East Rand s 25% 2 23% Johannesburg 32% 2 30% Evaluated cities Rank CI change City Country Congestion Morning peak Evening peak Highways Non-Highways 1 Johannesburg South Africa 30% 79% 66% 18% 37% 2 Cape Town South Africa 26% 78% 58% 22% 31% 3 East Rand n South Africa 25% 63% 65% 15% 37% 4 Pretoria South Africa 24% 57% 50% 11% 32% 5 East Rand s South Africa 23% 50% 50% 12% 32% 6 Durban South Africa 18% 47% 40% 14% 28% 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 4

South Africa Rank CI change City Country Congestion Morning peak Evening peak Highways Non-Highways 1 Johannesburg South Africa 30% 79% 66% 18% 37% 2 Cape Town South Africa 26% 78% 58% 22% 31% 3 East Rand n South Africa 25% 63% 65% 15% 37% 4 Pretoria South Africa 24% 57% 50% 11% 32% 5 East Rand s South Africa 23% 50% 50% 12% 32% 6 Durban South Africa 18% 47% 40% 14% 28% 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 5

Cape Town Congestion level 26% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 2/6 Congestion level on highways 22% Congestion level on non-highways 31% 39 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 90 h The weekly congestion pattern: Best and worst peak periods of the week Most congested specific day Thu 3 May 2012 Total network length 489 mi Total network length highways 160 mi Total network length non-highways 329 mi Total vehicle miles 2 467 547 mi Delay per hour 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 6

Durban Congestion level 18% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 6/6 Congestion level on highways 14% Congestion level on non-highways 28% 26 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 69 h The weekly congestion pattern: Best and worst peak periods of the week Most congested specific day Thu 6 Sep 2012 Total network length 1 002 mi Total network length highways 226 mi Total network length non-highways 777 mi Total vehicle miles 2 378 920 mi Delay per hour 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 7

East Rand n Congestion level 25% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 3/6 Congestion level on highways 15% Congestion level on non-highways 37% 38 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 89 h The weekly congestion pattern: Best and worst peak periods of the week Most congested specific day Thu 29 Nov 2012 Total network length 524 mi Total network length highways 86 mi Total network length non-highways 437 mi Total vehicle miles 6 259 304 mi Delay per hour 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 8

East Rand s Congestion level 23% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 5/6 Congestion level on highways 12% Congestion level on non-highways 32% 30 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 76 h The weekly congestion pattern: Best and worst peak periods of the week Most congested specific day Mon 23 Jan 2012 Total network length 601 mi Total network length highways 98 mi Total network length non-highways 504 mi Total vehicle miles 2 330 289 mi Delay per hour 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 9

Johannesburg Congestion level 30% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 1/6 Congestion level on highways 18% Congestion level on non-highways 37% 43 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 96 h The weekly congestion pattern: Best and worst peak periods of the week Most congested specific day Thu 6 Sep 2012 Total network length 1 612 mi Total network length highways 196 mi Total network length non-highways 1 417 mi Total vehicle miles 12 529 690 mi Delay per hour 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 10

Pretoria Congestion level 24% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 4/6 Congestion level on highways 11% Congestion level on non-highways 32% 32 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 80 h The weekly congestion pattern: Best and worst peak periods of the week Most congested specific day Thu 6 Sep 2012 Total network length 813 mi Total network length highways 106 mi Total network length non-highways 707 mi Total vehicle miles 5 612 950 mi Delay per hour 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 11

Evaluated cities South Africa Rank City Country Congestion Level (%) 24/7 Morning peak Evening peak Weekdays Weekend 1 Johannesburg South Africa 30 79 66 35 13 2 Cape Town South Africa 26 78 58 29 14 3 East Rand n South Africa 25 63 65 30 8 4 Pretoria South Africa 24 57 50 28 13 5 East Rand s South Africa 23 50 50 26 12 6 Durban South Africa 18 47 40 21 9 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 12

Keywords Keywords Average Free Flow Speed Average observed speeds Cities City Congestion level Delay per year for commuters FRC Free flow Free flow condition Free flow situation Free Flow Speed Highways Most congested day Most congested specific day Non-highways Peak hours Peak period Road network Time delay per year for commuters TomTom Congestion Level Total network length Total network length highways Total network length non-highways Total vehicle miles Travel time Urban area Urban network Definition Measured average road speed during a free flow situation (usually at night). Average observed speeds within specific time periods. TomTom evaluated capital cities as well as cities with a population of over 800 000. Next to the cities that meet these criteria, additional key cities are chosen and added in some countries. See Cities. See TomTom Congestion Level. Delay in minutes per hour driven during morning and evening peak times compared to free flow situations. For example, 22 minutes delay per hour at peak times indicates that a one hour journey driven at free flow times will take an additional 22 minutes at peak times. See Time delay per year for commuters. Functional Road Class, an industry standard that defines different road categories. FRC0 = highways, FRC1 = international roads/slip roads, FRC2 = major roads, FRC3 = secondary roads, FRC4 = connecting roads. See Free flow situation. See Free flow situation. A journey made without any delay caused by traffic congestion. This most typically occurs during the night. See Average Free Flow Speed. See FRC. See most congested specific day. The day with the highest Congestion Level. See FRC See Peak period. Based on real traffic measurements, the busiest one-hour-long period in the morning and in the evening period were determined for every evaluated city. In this report all speed measurements on roads classified as FRC0 through FRC4 within the urban areas contribute to the statistics. Delay per year with a 30 minute commute. Based on 230 work days per year and two peak periods per day. Increase in overall travel times when compared to a free flow situation. For example, a Congestion Level of 12% corresponds to 12% longer travel times compared to a free flow situation. Total length of the evaluated network in miles. Total length of the evaluated network in miles for FRC0 and FRC1 only. Total length of the evaluated network in miles for FRC2, FRC3 and FRC4 only. Total distance covered by all TomTom user measurements, used for this specific report. TomTom s historic traffic database contains over six trillion anonymous speed measurements. Theses speed measurements are used to calculate the travel times on individual road segments and entire networks. Geographical area that takes population size and network layout into account. Speed measurements within the defined urban area contribute to the statistics. The road network in an urban area. 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 13

Explanation of tables and figures Pages for continents Section Congestion Level Map of the continent Top 3 - increasing congestion Top 3 - decreasing congestion Top 10 cities / evaluated cities Rank CI change Congestion Morning peak Evening peak Highways Non-highways Congestion Worst average morning peak Worst average evening peak Description Average Congestion Level across all cities evaluated on the continent. Image of the continent showing the most congested cities. Top 3 cities with largest increase in the Congestion Level compared to the previous year. Top 3 cities with largest decrease in the Congestion Level compared to the previous year. Ranking of cities according to Congestion Levels. Rank according to Congestion Levels. Change in the Congestion Level compared to one year earlier. Congestion Level. Average Congestion Level during morning peak periods on work days. Average Congestion Level during evening peak periods on work days. Average Congestion Level for highways only. Average Congestion Level for non-highways only. Change in Congestion Level over the past quarters. Average Congestion Level for all the cities evaluated. Highest Congestion Level during the 5 morning peak periods (work days) in all cities evaluated. Highest Congestion Level during the 5 evening peak periods (work days) in all cities evaluated. Pages for cities Section Congestion Level Ranking of city compared to continent Congestion Level on highways Congestion Level on non-highways Delay per year with a 30 minute commute The weekly congestion pattern Congestion Worst average morning peak Worst average evening peak Description Average Congestion Level across all roads in the city. Rank of the city according to Congestion Level compared to other evaluated cities on the continent. Congestion Level for highways only. Congestion Level for non-highways only. Average delay in minutes for a one hour journey driven in the peak periods. The total accumulated delay over one year for a 30 minute commute driven in the peak periods on work days. Average Congestion Levels for the 10 peak periods in a week (morning and evening peak hours on 5 working days). Change in Congestion Level over the past quarters. Average Congestion Level across the city. Highest Congestion Level during the 5 morning peak periods (work days). Available in Quarterly reports, not available in Annual reports. Highest Congestion Level during the 5 evening peak periods (work days). Available in Quarterly reports, not available in Annual reports. 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. 14