LUTREOLA - Recovery of Mustela lutreola in Estonia : captive and island populations LIFE00 NAT/EE/007081

Similar documents
European Mink (Mustela lutreola) Status, threats and actions needed August 2013

European mink news 2018 CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES ACROSS EUROPE TO SAVE THE MOST ENDANGERED EUROPEAN CARNIVORE

Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos

Section 3: The Future of Biodiversity

Biodiversity and Conservation Biology

SUSTAINABLE HUNTING - Building Capacity for Sustainable Hunting of Migratory Birds in Mediterranean Third Countries LIFE04 TCY/INT/000054

Arctic Fox - Preservation of the Arctic Fox, Alopex lagopus, in Sweden and Finland LIFE98 NAT/S/005371

Chapter 14. Wildlife, Fisheries and Endangered Species. What are we Saving? Traditional Single-Species Wildlife Management

Policy Position Statement on Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and hybrids in Ireland and Northern Ireland

Marker, L. (2005). Aspects of ecology, biology and conservation strategies of Namibian farmland cheetahs. Animal Keeper's Forum 7/8.

Presentation of the Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe (LCIE)

Other Relevant International Standards OIE Global Conference on Rabies Control 7-9 September 2011, Incheon, Korea

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European Eel.

COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report for Grizzly Bear Western population (Ursus arctos) in Canada SUMMARY

The Case Against Fur Factory Farming A scientific Review of Animal Welfare Standards and WelFur

Oso en Asturias - Program for the conservation of the brown bear in Asturias LIFE98 NAT/E/005305

14 OTTER SPECIES ACTION PLAN

BRIEFING on IBERIAN LYNX (Lynx pardinus) MANAGEMENT PLAN AT DOÑANA NATIONAL PARK

A Forest Without Elephants: Can We Save One of Earth s Iconic Species?

9-1 What Role Do Humans Play in the Premature Extinction of Species?

Dallas Safari Club Auction of a Permit to Hunt a Namibian Black Rhino

Welcome to the Carnivore and Pangolin Conservation Program E-News

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service International Affairs Program

Exotic Wildlife Association Membership Alert

REINTRODUCTION OF PILEATED GIBBONS (Hylobates pileatus) TO THE ANGKOR PROTECTED FOREST, SIEM REAP, CAMBODIA

Concept paper on In-situ ex-situ linkage -Conservation Breeding of Endangered Wild Animal Species in India

RAFTS STOCKING POLICY

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

Memorandum of Understanding concerning. Conservation, Restoration and Sustainable Use of the Saiga Antelope (Saiga tatarica tatarica)

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Commitments by Friends of Target 12

Challenges of Florida Panther Conservation. Presented by: Darrell Land, Florida Panther Team Leader

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

Sustainable fisheries in the Mediterranean, Seabirds point of view Multiple choice and exercises ----

Reduction in Biological Diversity Section 4.1 p Section 4.3 p

For next Thurs: Jackson et al Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:

Complaint in stand-by No. 2012/7 ILLEGAL KILLING OF BIRDS IN MALTA

NASCO Guidelines for the Management of Salmon Fisheries

Biodiversity Conservation at Al Ain Zoo

[Docket No. FWS R2 ES ; FXES FF02ENEH00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Mexican Wolf Draft Recovery

Sustainable use of wildlife in the context of the GIZ Regional Programme in Central Asia

A new vision for the Birds Directive & The Positive Role of Hunting

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

Staff, Organizations Directly Affected (including but not limited to):

Screening report Serbia

Maintaining biodiversity in mixed-stock salmon fisheries in the Skeena watershed

Project on the evaluation of the human dimensions of the target audiences regarding Eastern wolves conservation in La Mauricie National Park of

Original language: English CoP17 Doc CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

Preserving Biodiversity

Salmon Five Point Approach restoring salmon in England

Western gorilla re-introduction to the Batéké Plateau region of Congo and Gabon

Submission on summary of the Draft Convention on Biological Diversity National Report

Report No. 27 to the Storting

NEWSLETTER. Talish mountains WWF-Caucasus CAUCASUS ECOREGION NEWSLETTER. News from the Caucasus. Special. Issue

Monitoring Asian Elephants and Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict in the Core Landscape of the Southern/Eastern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia

Getting the numbers right to better protect the brown bear in Romania

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OF THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LAW. Authorized by the Republic of China Wildlife Conservation Law, amended October 29, 1994.

Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs) District Councils (DCs) 27,924 km 2 (3.0% of Tanzania) 148 villages inhabited by 480,000 people. 21 registered WMAs

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

2. Scientific investigation of eel in Belarus, achievements

A G R E E M E N T. Between. Fisheries Management Authorities. from Republic of BULGARIA, ROMANIA, SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO and UKRAINE

Law on the Conservation of Species and Biotopes

Canon Envirothon Wildlife Curriculum Guidelines

Hartmann s Mountain Zebra Updated: May 2, 2018

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Are Zoos Sustainable? What the Visitors & Staff. Andrew Tribe The Gainsdale Group, HiddenVale, Queensland 4340

Official Journal of the European Union L 248/17

Fisheries Management Zone 10:

Short briefing Abjatta shall Lakes national parks

Fisheries Management Standard. Version 2.0

APPLICATION FOR CITES REGISTRATION OF A CAPTIVE BREEDING OPERATION

Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act

GLOBAL RE-INTRODUCTION PERSPECTIVES

IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA

Time is running out for bluefin tuna, sharks and other great pelagic fish. Oceana Recommendations for the ICCAT Commission meeting November 2008

IC Chapter 34. Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation

Briefing on the IWC s Conservation Committee

Proposal for cooperation between GRASP and the CMS Gorilla Agreement

ATLANTIC STURGEON. Consultations on listing under the Species at Risk Act

ESCA. Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 Changed in 1973 to ESA Amended several times

CNL(09)16 Summary of Annual Reports on Implementation Plans

Position of WWF Mongolia Program Office on current situation of Argali hunting and conservation in Mongolia

European flat oyster (Ostrea edulis) or native oyster. They are ecosystem engineers. Contribute to inshore biodiversity

Original language: English and French CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

The State of World Fishery

Killer whales and their prey in Iceland

The Eradication of Coypus from Britain

Revised as of 25 January 2018 Draft Roadmap to the Fourth Session of the UN Environment Assembly. Assembly

COMMISSIO STAFF WORKI G PAPER. Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment. Accompanying the document

Faster, better, cheaper: Transgenic Salmon. How the Endangered Species Act applies to genetically

2000 AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE FREE-RESPONSE QUESTIONS

Rebuilding depleted Baltic fish stocks lessons learned

The European rabbit: Past, Present and Future of the species in the Iberian Peninsula

Discovery Safari Field Guide

HUNTING WITH HOUNDS THE CASE FOR EUROPEAN UNION LEGISLATION

ZIMBABWE S REVIEW OF THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES (CITES) LEOPARD (PANTHERA PARDUS) QUOTA

Goliath Grouper Public Workshops August and October, 2017

World Oceans Day Does marine legislation actually protect the marine environment?

Transcription:

LUTREOLA - Recovery of Mustela lutreola in Estonia : captive and island populations LIFE00 NAT/EE/007081 Project description Environmental issues Beneficiaries Administrative data Read more Contact details: Project Manager: Tiit MARAN Tel: +372/694 33 18 Fax: +372/657 89 90 Email: tiit.maran@lutreola.ee, tiit.maran@tallinlv.ee Project description: Background The European mink (Mustela lutreola) is amongst the most critically endangered mammal species in Europe. Once upon a time it used to inhabit large parts of Central and Western Europe but populations began to crash at the beginning of the 20th century. Now the only viable population is to be found in Spain, with some small fragmented populations scattered around France and some areas in eastern Europe. The main reason for the drastic decline is competition from other mustelid species, primarily the American mink (Mustela vison), an exotic species which managed to populate the European continent after it escaped or was released from fur farms. Considering the precarious situation for the species, Tallinn Zoo initiated, in 1983, a captive breeding programme for the European mink, within the framework of an IUCN species specialist group. At present, the captive breeding stock numbers around 100 individuals. A trial release programme at Hiiumaa Island in western Estonia was started up in 2000. Objectives Building on the experience already gained with this species, the LIFE project intended to launch a more substantial release programme on the island of Saaremaa in western Estonia. First, the captive breeding facility would have to be enhanced to accommodate a maximum of 145 animals. This would make it

possible to secure a captive population of satisfactory genetic constitution over a 25-year period, as well as to breed animals for release into the wild. 30-50 animals would then be released on Saaremaa in order to try to establish a wild population of European mink. This would be preceded by detailed field studies, removal of American mink and preparation of the animals for release. The dispersal and survival of around 20 of the released animals would be monitored by radio-tracking. The release programme already initiated at Hiiumaa Island was to be followed up by the preparation of a management plan for the population on this island. Core areas and habitats of both islands were to be protected by the end of the project. Results The two main parts of the project were to reinforce the size and genetic status of the captive population of Mustela lutreola (European mink) at Tallinn Zoo, and to establish a free-living population on Saaremaa Island. The project was successfully completed in so far as that the targets with reference to the size of the captive population and the number of released animals were achieved. It was however over-optimistic that success in terms of the size and genetic pool of the wild population could be obtained within a short timeframe. One of the lessons learned was that success can only be expected with a long-term effort, maybe ten years, considering the low recruitment rate in the released population. This effort will continue after the end of the LIFE project. THE RELEASE PROGRAMME: During the implementation of the project, it was decided to shift the release of animals into the wild from Saaremaa Island to Hiiumaa Island to reinforce the already existing introduced population there. By the end of the project in November 2004, 149 animals had been released, i.e. more than the number foreseen at project start, and the free-living population was estimated to be 16-28 animals. However, the overall objective to establish, during the project, a free-living and sustainable wild population of the target species on Hiiumaa Island, was not achieved. Low recruitment by the wild population seems to be the main concern for future management. The discovery that this may be linked to inability by many of the released males to contribute to reproduction, due to behavioural constraints (abnormal aggression) rather than physiological incapacity (such as sperm quality), is considered a very important outcome of the project, though more research will be needed to gain full scientific evidence. THE CAPTIVE STOCK AT TALLINN ZOO: This stood at 104 animals at the end of the project, e.g. very close to the target of 110 animals. In actual fact, numbers fluctuate between 95 and 160 animals, depending on the time of the year (release dates!). New breeding facilities and outdoor training enclosures were installed, and at the end of project, the beneficiary judged that the installations at Tallinn Zoo were the best conservation breeding facility for the target species in Europe, largely thanks to the investments done by the LIFE project. However, in order to assure the long-term sustainability with reference to genetic diversity, new wild-caught founders must be added to the captive breeding population and the problem with behavioural abnormalities and low reproduction by males born in captivity must be solved. From the start, it was obvious that this was a "high-risk-project", but also that it involved some of the only possible actions left to give the long-term survival of the European mink a chance and to create options for the restoration of viable free-living populations in the future. Even if it were to fail due to the many elements of uncertainty, there was a potential to

gain valuable experience for the future. From that perspective, the project delivered according to expectations. NATURA 2000 AND THE DESIGNATION OF SITES FOR THE EUROPEAN MINK IN ESTONIA: On request from the Estonian Ministry of the Environment, the beneficiary presented a proposal for 10 core sites for the European mink on Hiiumaa Island, i.e. the project had a clear incentive impact on the Natura 2000 process in Estonia, with reference to the proposal of psci sites for the target species. A GENERAL AND IMPORTANT EXPERIENCE FROM THE PROJECT WAS THAT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FREE-LIVING POPULATION IS A MUCH LONGER PROCESS THAN ASSUMED WHEN PREPARING THE PROJECT: "Soft" release methods, i.e. training the animals before release and giving support (shelters etc) after release, is more effective than "hard" release techniques of letting animals go without any training or support; i.e. the time and cost involved in training is justifiable. It is however still not possible to recommend which of the various combinations of "soft" techniques tested in the project provide optimal results. Preliminary results from the monitoring indicate that there is no difference in survival between females released when pregnant or non-pregnant, although there is still too little data on the survival of the litters. For the long-term management of the captive stock at various breeding centres in Europe, the current estimate is that a total 500 animals are needed in order to maintain 90 % of the initial genetic heterozygosity over 100 years. ATTITUDES AMONG THE LOCAL COMMUNITY: In 2003-2004, the beneficiary did a survey of general knowledge about the European mink project on Hiiumaa Island. 260 questionnaires were distributed, and 164 (64 %) were returned. The result can be briefly summarised: 97 % knew about the project. Most respondents knew about the rareness of Mustela lutreola and had a clear understanding that the species is a natural component of the boreal ecosystem. 32-50 % (depending on stakeholder group) argued that existing restrictions for the benefit of the European mink are enough. There were remarkable differences in attitude between age groups (22-45 years and 46-82 years): the older group being more afraid of the negative impact of the release of Mustela lutreola on fish and crayfish stocks, killing of hens etc. The older group also had an overall less good knowledge of the target species and resisted any new restrictions for the survival of the species. Personal contacts were the most important "tool" for information and promotion. Second most important was local newspapers, radio and TV. The project website was primarily used by those who had a deeper interest in the subject. Environmental issues addressed: Themes Biodiversity issues - Invasive species Species - Mammals Keywords

conservation of genetic resources ecological assessment environmental education introduction of animal species monitoring wildlife sanctuary population dynamics Target EU Legislation Nature protection and Biodiversity Directive 92/43 - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora- Habitats Directiv... Decision 93/626 - Conclusion of the Convention on Biological Diversity (25.10.1993) COM(98)42 -"Communication on a European Community Biodiversity Strategy" (05.02.1998) COM(2001)162 -"Biodiversity Action Plan for the conservation of natural resources (vol. I & II)"... Target species Mustela lutreola Natura 2000 sites Not applicable Beneficiaries: Coordinator Type of organisation Description Partners Nature Conservation Foundation NGO-Foundation The Lutreola Foundation is a non-profit foundation established at Tallinn Zoo in 1999, as the successor of the European Mink Conservation and Breeding Commiitee (EMCC), established in 1992 under the aegis of the IUCN Small Carnivore Specialist Group. The EMCC and the Lutreola Foundation have been behind all conservation action related to Mustela lutreola in Estonia and, to a certain extent, also in Russia and Belarus. The Lutreola Foundation acts through individually funded projects and does not have any permanent staff. Tallinn Zoological Gardens (Tallinn Zoo) West Estonian Archipelago Biosphere Reserves' Hiiumaa Centre

Administrative data: Project reference LIFE00 NAT/EE/007081 Duration 01-SEP-2001 to 01-DEC -2004 Total budget 373,454.00 EU contribution 186,727.00 Project location Associated Estonia (EE)(Estonia Eesti) Read more: Project web site Publication: Book Project web site Title: Management plan of the European mink Mustela lutreola in Hiiumaa (2004-2008) Author: Podra, M. & Maran, T. Year: 2003 Editor: Lutreola Foundation No of pages: 121 Project description Environmental issues Beneficiaries Administrative data Read more