History and Legislation

Similar documents
Enforcement of Bus Lane and Moving Traffic Contraventions in Cardiff. Councillor Briefing Pack

Civil Parking Enforcement of Bus Lane Contraventions. Yes. Yes

Report to Cabinet. 18 May 2016

Haringey Annual Parking and Enforcement Report. April 2010 March 2011

Traffic Management Act 2004 implications of enactment. Nancy Cox Regulatory and Interconnect Manager August 2004

Stevenage Borough Council. On Street Parking Services

Adjudicator s Decision

Parking Partnership Enforcement. Showing the Partnership Enforcement Policy and links to Regional and National Policy,

Process for managing parking on verges, footways and footpaths

MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 9, SUBJECT: Use Of Cameras To Enforce Transit Lanes RECOMMENDATIONS. It is recommended that the Commission:

The Joint Report of the Bus Lane Adjudicators

ENFIELD TOWN THE REVISED DESIGN

Appendix 12 Parking on footways and verges

LEA BRIDGE ROAD - A STREET FOR EVERYONE Public consultation document

Safer Roads Humber Annual Safety Camera Progress Report April 2010 March 2011

Frequently asked questions (FAQ) about a borough-wide 20 mph speed limit

Mill Hill Broadway Capacity Improvement

Network Management Plan. Traffic Management Act 2004

Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Highway Infrastructure Manager

London Safety Camera Partnership

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 2 Speed and Traffic Management

Dear Sir, 8 May Please accept this letter as formal representation against Enforcement Notice as detailed above.

Bus Lane Laws. What happens if you have to go into a bus lane? Bus lanes. Penalties of using bus lanes. When can you use them? Who can use them?

MARKHOUSE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS

USE OF SPEED AND RED LIGHT CAMERAS FOR TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT: GUIDANCE ON DEPLOYMENT, VISIBILITY AND SIGNING

SLOUGH Stage 3 Road Safety Audit of A4 London Road, M4 J5 to Sutton Lane

Hollow Spike Tyre Deflation System

London s Bus Priority

CORBY BOROUGH COUNCIL JANUARY 2000

Model Byelaws for Hackney Carriages BYELAWS. Interpretation

CHIPPING BARNET RESIDENTS FORUM BARNET HOUSE, 1255 HIGH ROAD, WHETSTONE, N20 0EJ TUESDAY, 25 JUNE 2013, 6.00PM

Developing a Safer Cycling Strategy for the ACT ACRS Conference August 2012

5. The speed camera site outside the Parkwood Rest Home opposite Linwood College is a valuable deterrent. The speed camera site should be retained.

A127/A130 Fairglen Interchange Improvement Schemes. Information Leaflet February 2017

Essential Standard No. 16. Streetworks - Short duration static works carried out from a vehicle

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

The Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Aurang Zeb - Head of Highways & Transport

Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee. Restricted Roads (20mph Speed Limit) (Scotland) Bill: Key Themes Arising from the Online Survey

TEST OF ENGLISH FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES

High 2010 Medium 2010/11. PCT NHS Darlington Primary Care Trust HPC DBC DBC. High HPC. Med to High

EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CONFERENCE 2006 ROAD SAFETY IN LONDON PAST SUCCESSES AND FUTURE INNOVATIONS

THE CITY OF CARDIFF COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: 4 CYNGOR DINAS CAERDYDD

Review of Considerations and Requirements for Automated Enforcement

The Consultation has now ended.

Haringey. Annual Parking and Enforcement Report APRIL MARCH

Traffic Sensitive Streets. Guidance Notes. GeoPlace Streets Team. Traffic Sensitive Streets. Guidance Note Page 1 of 7.

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 886, FOOTPATHS, PEDESTRIAN WAYS, BICYCLE PATHS, BICYCLE LANES AND CYCLE TRACKS. Chapter 886

A guide to how local communities can change local speed limits

[ Fundación PONS ] [ Fundación PONS ] [ Expertise PONS ] Investing in road safety

Know your smart motorways M60/M62, Greater Manchester

Traditional Public Transport Priority. Priority/Traffic Management? What is Integrated Public Transport Priority/Traffic management? Why? How?

Automated Traffic Enforcement Technology Guidelines

Low Level Cycle Signals used as repeaters of the main traffic signals Appendices

Living Streets response to the Draft London Plan

Cycle Superhighway 4 from Tower Bridge to Greenwich

Freedom of Information Request Reference No: I note you seek access to the following information:

No-car lanes in Tyneside results from modelling and stakeholder analysis

ON-FIELD DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES PART 1

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 41

20mph. We want to make Edinburgh a better and safer place to live, work and play.

NZ Transport Agency Cycling Rules

September 20, 2016 L Taraval Rapid Project SFMTA Board of Directors Meeting

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

PROCEDURE Road Traffic Collisions (Recording) Number: H 0601 Date Published: 24 May 2016

Road Safety Strategy

Roadways. Roadways III.

London Cycling Design Standards. Chapter 4 Links Cycle lanes, cycle tracks and other cycle facilities

Background. The scale of the problem. The scale of the problem. Road Safety in London, the statistics. 280 Fatalities from road crashes in 2002

Draft letter to Designers and Managing Agents INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 43/02: CANTILEVER AND PORTAL GANTRY VMS

Developing an Effective Safe Routes to School Funding Program for Hawai i

Kings Road, Herne Bay: Proposed Crash Remedial Measure

4. Guided Bus Explained

Urgent duty driving (UDD) This chapter contains these topics: Overview Legal provisions - defences Responsibilities

Integrated Corridor Approach to Urban Transport. O.P. Agarwal World Bank Presentation at CODATU XV Addis Ababa, 25 th October 2012

Public Consultation on Braintree Integrated Transport Package (ITP) HAVE YOUR. Consultation open from 24 September to 5 November 2018 SAY

RESTRICTED ROADS (20 MPH SPEED LIMIT) (SCOTLAND) BILL. 1. Is reducing the speed limit to 20mph the best way of achieving the aims of the Bill?

Improving the Bus Network through Traffic Signalling. Henry Axon Transport for London

Transportation and Equity: A 2017 Agenda for Candidates

JUDICIARY COMMITTEE GUIDELINES (Amended February 2010)

Minor Amendments to the Street and Traffic By-law 2849 and Skateboards in Protected Bike Lanes

Q&A for Safety Code. Prepared by the HAUC-UK Safety Code working group

PUNECE Level Crossing Expert Group Enforcement Sub-group

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 4 Signs & Road Markings

Smart motorways: all lane running on the M25. Guidance for EEAST crews

GETTING WHERE WE WANT TO BE

CHURCH ROAD. Public consultation document TELL US YOUR VIEWS.

Bus Safety Rules Handbook

August 12, The Honorable Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor, State of California State Capitol Sacramento, CA Dear Governor Brown:

Design and Installation of Low Level Cycle Signals

Chapter 8 (2009) - Summary of key changes

Strategic Director for Environment. Enclosures Appendix A - Option drawings. Jamie Blake- Strategic Director for Environment

Frascati Road and Temple Hill Route Improvements. Outline Design Report to Accompany Public consultation

Toll Collection and Violation Enforcement. August 9,

IESL Annual Sessions 21 st October 2003

Beat Areas Newbold on Avon Benn - Brownsover North Brownsover South. Rugby Town North Policing area:

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

9. Parking Supporting Statement

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Milton Road Project Update. Paul van de Bulk 30 January 2018

BELFAST RAPID TRANSIT. Ciarán de Búrca Director, Transport Projects Division Department for Regional Development

Transcription:

Chronological Summary Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 Allowed use of devices such as cameras for the enforcement of Bus Lanes Devices must be Home Office approved Road Traffic Act 1991 Decriminalised parking regulations, allowing Local Authorities to enforce London Local Authorities Act 1996 Gave London Local Authorities power to enforce Bus Lanes using cameras PCN s issued via 1 st class post Greater London Authority Act 1999 Gave Traffic Authority status to Transport for London London Local Authorities Act and Transport for London Act 2003 Gave London Local Authorities power to enforce moving traffic contraventions Traffic Management Act 2004 Gave London and non-london Authorities powers to enforce parking, bus lanes and moving traffic (only parking enacted so far) Intended to create greater consistency between London and non- London Local Authorities 1

Use of Cameras The use of cameras as an enforcement tool was not unique to the London Local Authorities Acts. The Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 said devices (such as Cameras) could be used to produce evidence of an infringement or contravention in legal proceedings and that the cameras must be Home Office Approved. The Road Traffic Offenders (Additional Offences and Prescribed Devices) order 1997 added offences relating to bus lane cameras as devices that may be used to produce evidence. Benefits of using cameras to enforce parking & traffic regulations: Evidence collected for all to stay Tape can be reviewed to ensure sound decision Enforcement actions can be monitored by supervisors Cameras in themselves are a deterrent Safer for enforcement staff Staff can cover wider area of enforcement in a given time span Less risk of intimidation of issuing officers Better public relations Transport for London (TfL) TfL enforces bus lanes throughout London under the powers invested upon it by the Transport for London (Bus Lanes) order 2001. The power to enforce on behalf of other London local authorities was granted when TfL was given traffic authority status for GLA roads and side roads under the Greater London Authority Act 1999. The geographical area covered by this power is the whole of Greater London and will extend as far as the area of responsibility for TfL. 2

Part II of the Road Traffic Act 1991 (RTA 91) The Road Traffic Act 1991 was the legislation that enabled local authorities to enforce on-street parking contraventions fairly and consistently. Prior to 1991 police and traffic wardens carried this out and income from Fixed Penalty Notices (FPNs) was accrued to the Exchequer. The police service was increasingly unable to provide the resources necessary. The consequences of the lack of enforcement, in terms of road safety and congestion, were not acceptable and so the 1991 Act made it mandatory for London boroughs and optional for other local authorities to take on the civil enforcement of parking contraventions. This Act decriminalised parking contraventions meaning it was no longer the responsibility of the police, but the responsibility of Local Authorities. The Police still have a continuing role in some areas. For example, enforcing offences such as dangerous parking or parking offences at pedestrian crossings. Under this legislation, a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) would be issued to a vehicle in contravention and the Vehicle Owner is responsible for paying the PCN. The Registered Keeper is presumed to be the Owner. Penalty Charges are a civil debt that is due to the Local Authority. It is collected through a Civil Debt Recovery process. The Local Authority retains any proceeds from the PCNs however the spending of this revenue is limited to certain areas. Because the enforcement is decriminalised, cases are no longer heard by magistrate s court, appeals will be dealt with by an Adjudicator working for the Appeals service. Priority Routes Priority Routes are created on the main thoroughfares to improve the movement of traffic, reduce congestion and improve the efficiency of the public transport network. The Priority Routes carry a No stopping restriction. During the operational hours vehicles may not stop to load, unload, park, pick up or set down passengers. There may be boxes marked along the Priority Route where specific activities may take place, loading, setting down passengers, etc as stated on the accompanying signs. Enforcement of a Priority Route in London is the responsibility of Transport of London (TfL). The Priority Route is red and is known as the Transport for London Road Network (TLRN). Controlled Parking Zones (CPZs) This is an area that is controlled at given hours by the use of waiting restrictions and parking bays. Within CPZs, time plates for waiting restrictions are not necessary as the hours of restriction are indicated by zone entry signs. 3

The Traffic Management Act 2004 The Traffic Management Act 2004 (TMA 2004) was introduced to bring London and non-london enforcement authorities into line in order to provide for greater consistency across the country while allowing for parking policies to suit local circumstances. Previously, London authorities had been given additional powers of enforcement which did not exist outside London. For example, it was only London authorities that were given powers to enforce moving traffic offences and footway parking. This Act now supersedes the RTA 91 and allows Civil Parking Enforcement or CPE (formerly Decriminalised Parking Enforcement) to be carried out by authorities Englandwide. It also seeks to ensure that the system is fair to the motorist as well as effective in enforcing parking contraventions when they occur. To be able to enforce regulations a local authority must apply to the Secretary of State for Transport to introduce a Civil Enforcement Area (CEA). This allows local authorities to enforce traffic regulations within dedicated geographical areas. Within the CEA, traffic enforcement is no longer the responsibility of the police but that of the Local Authority. It is now the job of the Civil Enforcement Officer or CEIO (formerly Parking Attendant) to identify that a contravention (offence) has taken place and to issue a Penalty Charge Notice. Contraventions can be identified either by CEOs on-street or by CEOs operating approved devices, such as CCTV cameras. Outside a CEA, all traffic regulations remain subject to the criminal law and remain the responsibility of the Police Service. Please note The TMA 2004 is being introduced in stages. From the 31 st of March 2008, it is only parking contraventions that have been enacted under the TMA 2004. Moving traffic contraventions (bus lanes and other moving traffic contraventions) will not be enacted until at least 2009. London authorities in the mean time will continue to enforce bus lanes and moving traffic under powers given to them by the London Local Authorities Acts as explained below. London Local Authority Act 1996 The London Local Authorities Act 1996 gave powers to London authorities to enforce moving traffic offences on local authority bus lanes. Up until that point local authorities were responsible for the enforcement of stationary parking contraventions only, with the police retaining responsibility for all moving traffic offences. The Bus Lane contravention was the first moving traffic offence to be enforceable by Local Authorities. The LLA 1996 made it possible for Bus Lane offences to be enforced using CCTV, static or bus mounted camera equipment. The Penalty Charge Notice 4

will be served by post to the registered keeper. Prior to this the notice had to be served to the driver or the vehicle at the time of issue. Six London authorities operated a pilot scheme to assess the feasibility of camera enforcement. During the pilot scheme a legal technicality was highlighted which temporarily suspended camera enforcement. The wording of the Act did not make it clear if the driver or the keeper of the vehicle was legally liable for the PCN, this difficulty was later amended by the London Local Authorities Act 2000. The London Local Authorities Act 2000 allowed enforcement of parking contraventions via CCTV. This power has now been consolidated into the Traffic Management Act 2004. London Local Authority and TfL Act 2003 The London Local Authority and TfL Act 2003 gave local authorities the power to enforce a range of moving vehicle contraventions, such as box junctions and banned turns. Apart from the bus lane contravention, this was the first time enforcement had been permitted on moving vehicles. CCTV was chosen as the best method to enforce these codes. A whole range of moving offences has been passed over to Local authorities to enforce. These PCNs will be issued and served by post in the same way as a bus lane or parking ticket. The LLA Acts 1996 & 2003 gave London authorities additional powers of enforcement. Legislation already existed (RTA 91) which specified how PCNs should be processed so this remained the same. Therefore with a few minor changes to the process (to take into account the PCN being served by post) the LLA 1996 allowed that in all other respects a PCN is processed as if it were a Penalty Charge Notice issued under the Road Traffic Act 1991. It follows the same civil debt recovery route. 5