IRB 7. Network for Clinical Research Professionals (NCRP) Seminar June 18, 2013

Similar documents
Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Purpose: The following serves to aid Principal Investigators (PI) in the submission of Amendments to AURA-IRB. Document includes: Acronyms and Legend

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: How to Apply for External IRB Review

External IRB Instructions for the Registration Pathway in OSIRIS

A Guide to SMART IRB s Resources for IRB and HRPP Personnel

6/19/2014. Children s Hospital of Philadelphia: Recent Changes. Recent Changes in CHOP IRB Procedures

IRB Authorization Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

Click IRB Resources Frequently Asked Questions

7.0 DEVIATION and EXCEPTION of a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROTOCOL

IRB Staff Administration Guide

SOP #2-2 Version #1 Date First Effective: December 14, Page 1 of 6

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Post-Approval Submissions

SMART IRB Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016

Commercial/ Central IRB An independent organization that provides IRB review services

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Serving as a Reviewing IRB

Pepperdine University eprotocol - IRB Student Investigator User Guide

CUNY HRPP Procedures: Multisite Non-Exempt Human Subjects Research

Central IRBs: Where Does the UR Fit into the Picture?? Kelley O Donoghue Tiffany Gommel Emily Flagg April 15 th 2015

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

Single IRB Review. Jeannie Barone Director, HRPO. Institutional Review Board

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

November 30, Efficient Startup of Multi-site Research Studies: Central IRBs and National IRB Reliance Platforms

INTRA-INSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION

JeffTrial IRB Submission Regulatory Coordinator Training. Kimmel Cancer Center 09/16/2013 Ver. 1.0

Institutional Review Board Submission Requirement Presentation

Choose the quarter in which the submission was reviewed and approved: Please provide the following information about the minutes being reivewed:

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date: 07/18/2011

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH NETWORK

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

Baptist Health Institutional Review Board. Study Closure Report (Expedited Review) IRB #: Study Title:

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

IRBMED: Ceding IRB Review to an External IRB

The IRB reviews and monitors human subjects research conducted by Columbia College Chicago faculty, staff, and students.

Tuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN S E RVICES, 'mgr,':~~ MAY WARNING LETTE R

RESEARCH PROTECTIONS OFFICE

IRB Reliance Models: Workshop for OSU Researchers Collaborating with External Partners

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

IRB Chair Responsibilities

Collaborative Research

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

Humanitarian Use Devices Made Simple

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

eirb User Manual Kaiser Permanente Institutional Review Boards Georgia Hawaii Northwest

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Getting Started with SMART IRB & the Online Reliance System

Pearls of Wisdom. Debra Herzan, Josh Lachewitz, Kurombi Wade-Oliver Alliance Chicago Office. May 2015

GUIDE TO DAILY OPERATIONS

Pearls of Wisdom. Debra Herzan, Josh Lachewitz, Kurombi Wade-Oliver Alliance Chicago Office. May 2015

RESEARCH SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Human Research Protection Program Policy

HOW TO CONDUCT AN IRB RELIANCE AGREEMENT. What Reliance Agreements Are, How They Are Reviewed, and What It Means for Submitting Research

Centralized IRB Models

Info Sheet - Operations

University of Minnesota Center for Magnetic Resonance Research Standard Operating Procedure Human System Magnet Operator Training

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

NIH StrokeNet Network Standard Operating Procedure

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

Harding IRB FAQ. Issue 1: General Questions

AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE

IRB Minutes Quality Improvement Assessment

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date: 05/14/2014

IRB-REQUIRED INVESTIGATOR ACTIONS

Lapse in IRB Approval

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Getting Started with SMART IRB & the Online Reliance System

EXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.

Issue in IRB Approvals:

IRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR S ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES

Version 1. Submission Guide and Policies

IRB Myths & Misconceptions: Myths Busted Kelly Kidner, CIP & Stacie Fujisaki, CIP

DRGR FACT SHEET: Release 7.13 QPR Review

Transcription:

IRB 7 Network for Clinical Research Professionals (NCRP) Seminar June 18, 2013

What is IRB 7? IRB 7 is a new electronic IRB solution from Huron Consulting Group Same underlying software as eprost, but more streamlined configuration Same vendor Huron Consulting Group Similar look and feel to eprost Designed to be an out-of-the-box solution, but can be customized to meet UM s reporting and operational needs Built around Huron s HRPP Toolkit Available for download at http://www.besthrppsops.com/ A set of SOPs, checklists, and worksheets designed to ensure regulatory compliance and built around best practices

eprost vs. IRB 7 A Few Key Differences eprost IRB 7 Maximum Length of SmartForms 70 pages for new study 10 pages for new study Study Team Members Protocol form vs. sponsor protocol Must be added individually to each new study Must copy/paste text from sponsor protocol into eprost forms PI has the option of setting up a standard study team so study team members will be pre-populated in each new study (with the option to remove individuals as needed) Simply upload the sponsor protocol IRB 7 is more document-centric Continuing Reports/Amendments Must be submitted separately Can be submitted as a single submission Department-level Review Ancillary Committee Reviews Parallel Amendments Reportable Events Mandatory and must be completed before submission can move forward to Ancillary review Must be completed after department review and before HSRO/IRB review Not possible in eprost; limited to one amendment at a time A reportable event associated with multiple studies must be created for each study individually Optional and can be completed in parallel with ancillary and HSRO/IRB reviews Can be completed in parallel with ancillary and HSRO/IRB review May have two Amendments open at a time; one for study team changes, the other for changes to any other aspect of the study A single reportable event can be tied to multiple studies

Workflow parallel review

eprost vs. IRB 7 Differences (cont d) eprost IRB 7 Protocol Study Amendment Reportable Event/Notification Expedited Review or Exempt Review Full Board Review Modification Reportable New Information (RNI) Non-Committee Review Committee Review

Other IRB 7 Advantages No major changes to basic functionality Basic functionality will be the same as in eprost (i.e. uploading documents, printer-friendly version, continue/back buttons, Hide/Show Errors) Limits data collection to the minimum necessary Don t ask investigators when the IRB already knows the answer Helps mitigate risk by eliminating duplicative data entry Education/training materials incorporated into the system Integrated on-line help and user documentation Checklists and Worksheets will help ensure consistency in reviews Limited customization = Easier to maintain and upgrade Toolkit Checklists and Worksheets can be updated as needed, so regulatory changes and process changes won t necessarily require an update to the system

When IRB 7 is implemented eprost system will remain available as read-only, but all new submissions will be created in IRB 7 We will create snapshots of all active studies as of the implementation date and IRB 7 will link back to eprost Timeline for implementation and roll-out plan: September 2013