Is the freestyle dressage competition a reliable test of the horse s performance?

Similar documents
GUIDELINES FOR JUDGING DRESSAGE TO MUSIC March 2010

THAILAND EQUESTRIAN FEDERATION WALK TROT TEST 1

OLYMPIC FORMATS OLYMPIC FORMATS SUBTITLE JUMPING

Competition Development Pathway Athlete, Coach and Parent Guide for Dressage

FEI DRESSAGE NATIONS CUP RULES

Session 3 - Dressage Future

Directives for International Dressage Competitions for 5, 6 and 7-year old horses

FEI DRESSAGE NATIONS CUP RULES

Education System for FEI Dressage Judges. Update: 01 January 2015

HOW TO WATCH A DRESSAGE SHOW A GUIDE TO DRESSAGE TESTS

FEI DRESSAGE WORLD CUP RULES SEASON

BONEO CLASSIC 2018 ETITO

Nagmart Saddlery proudly presents. The Orange Grove Adult Riding Club ARCA Dressage Challenge

L A N D R O V E R H O R S E O F T H E Y E A R 1 2 t h 1 7 t h M A R C H DRESSAGE CONDITIONS 2019

Eventing Risk Management Programme Statistics ( )

HOW TO GET STARTED DRESSAGE TO MUSIC AND RIDING TO MUSIC

DRESSAGE NZ FREESTYLE GUIDELINES FOR JUDGES & RIDERS MEMO from SUE HOBSON DRESSAGE NZ JUDGES OFFICER 29/10/2015

EUROPEAN RIDERS, HORSES AND SHOWS AT THE FEI 2012

2019 Freestyle Rules and Guidelines Effective 12/1/ /30/2022 Training, First, Second, Third, and Fourth Level Freestyle

2019 Freestyle Rules and Guidelines

HOUSTON DRESSAGE SOCIETY, CDI Pre-Entry and Entry Guide March 2015 Version

Explore the basis for including competition traits in the genetic evaluation of the Icelandic horse

DRESSAGE AT THE ASIAN GAMES 2014 GUIDELINES FOR POTENTIAL COMPETITORS

Generally important in walk: Well marked 4 time beat, full relaxation and suppleness throughout the body, activity, consistency of tempo.

Ulf Wilken Hungary October 2017

FÉDÉRATION ÉQUESTRE INTERNATIONALE Jumping

Equestrian Sport Educative Events (ESEEs)

Genetic Analysis of Eventing Data in the Swedish Warmblood Population

Competition Jumping Horses: Effects of Age, Sex and Breed on the Fei/Wbfsh World Ranking

Hong Kong Equestrian Performance Plan A pathway to equestrian excellence

ANATOMY OF USEF DRESSAGE TEST SHEETS TRAINING THROUGH FOURTH LEVELS by Leslie Raulin

Southern Solstice Dressage Competition 19/20 January Albany Equestrian Centre, Roberts Road, Albany

Concurrent measurement of lower limbs stability in balance examinations

DRESSAGE. The Host NOC (CAN) CAN. The NOCs of the 2 best ranked teams from the Americas at the 2014 World Equestrian Games (WEG).

DRIVING RULES FOR YOUNG HORSES FEI Standard events and FEI Championships 1 st edition Updates effective 1 st January 2019

INVITATION The 1 st qualifier for the Alpe Adria Dressage Trophy (AAT)

Implications of across-studbook genetic correlations between linear traits for sport horse breeding

BOOGIE WOOGIE FORMATION

NEW YORK STATE 4-H DRESSAGE DIVISION

Mid European Championships MEM

1 of 6 04/05/ :44

ANATOMY OF USDF DRESSAGE TEST SHEETS INTRODUCTORY LEVEL by Leslie Raulin

1) Włodzimierz Starosta, 2) Iwona Dębczyńska-Wróbel, 3) Łukasz Lamcha

CARDING NOMINATION CRITERIA FOR THE SPORT CANADA ATHLETE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 2017 Carding Cycle. EQUESTRIAN Eventing

FEI Fédération Equestre Internationale


2018 USEF Dressage National Championship Qualifying Requirements

MASTERS SYNCHRONISED SWIMMING RULES (MSS)

The Practical Application of the Training Pyramid to Judging and Showing

Introduction. There is no monopoly on the ranking list :

EQUESTRIAN Updated for Jumping on 1 March31 May 2018

The Prydes 2018 South Australian Young Dressage Horse & Pony Final

Hollyberry Hall. in association with Dressage SA proudly presents the third of three events in the

MICHIANA DRESSAGE CLUB, INC.

The BEF England Excel Talent Programme

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF JUDGING IN MEN S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS AT THE 2009 UNIVERSITY GAMES

What s new in the 2018 Members Handbook?

2016 INTERNATIONAL RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR QUALIFIED BREEDING STOCK (TQB) TRIBUNALS

Dressage Judges Training Program Requirements and Procedures for Obtaining Senior S Status

The Irish Sport Horse Studbook Genetic Evaluation Report 2015

Venue: (select one) Unrated/Schooling Rated FEI sanctioned Enrollment Division: Open (All-Breed) Breed Restricted (AHA)

SPORTS PARTICIPATION CHANGES IN LONDON FOLLOWING LONDON 2012 WITH NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS

WDAA Proposed Rule Changes

REMITS to CONFERENCE 2015

DIFFERENTIATED ANALYSIS OF OFFENSIVE ACTIONS BY FOOTBALL PLAYERS IN SELECTED MATCHES FROM THE EURO 2008

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM COMPETITION ANALYSIS AT THE 1999 PAN PACIFIC SWIMMING CHAMPIONSHIPS?

RULES FOR PONY COMPETITIONS AND EQUITATION NB

COMPETITOR INFORMATION PACK

ROMANIAN SPORT HORSES: EFFECTS OF COMPETITION LEVEL, SEX AND BREEDER ON THE NATIONAL DRESSAGE RANKING

2018 ISI Judge Certification Update Test

Rules for Qualifying and Championships

New Competition Structure

Equestrian. Woodford. The only school in Hawke s Bay to offer an equestrian academy

Rules for the 2019 LONGINES GLOBAL CHAMPIONS TOUR. including the rules fort the LGCT Super Grand Prix

Opleiding Informatica

IRV CYR Wheel Free Programme

CARDING NOMINATION CRITERIA FOR THE SPORT CANADA ATHLETE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

DRESSAGE Selected events for achieving Minimum Eligibility Standard (MES) for the Olympic Games 2012

THREE PHASE EQUITATION RULES

BALTIC DRESSAGE LEAGUE, Lithuania SCHEDULE

WEG SELECTION POLICY - DRESSAGE SELECTION POLICY 2018 WORLD EQUESTRIAN GAMES DRESSAGE

EVENT SCHEDULE JANUARY 2015 EQUESTRIAN MEETS THE MORNINGTON PENINSULA

Making the Time. An Expert Guide to Cross Country Riding. Stuart Tinney Gold Medallist Sydney Olympics OAM. with. Alison Duthie

PARA EQUESTRIAN DRESSAGE TEST x60 Arena GRADE V TEAM TEST. Event : Date : Judge : Position. Marks

SYNCHRONISED SWIMMING SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SESSIONS SS5 PROGRAMMES SS 6 ENTRIES SS7 PRELIMINARIES AND FINALS SS 8 FIGURE SESSION SS 9 FIGURE PANELS

BONEO CLASSIC 2018 ETITO

2018 MARTIN COLLINS AUSTRALIAN DRESSAGE CHAMPIONSHIPS COMPETITOR INFORMATION PACK

RULES FOR JUMPING CHAMPIONSHIPS AND GAMES

save percentages? (Name) (University)

FEI World CupTM Jumping and FEI World CupTM Dressage Identity Guidelines

Team Rules / Guidelines:

Rolex/USEF Show Jumping Ranking List Guidelines

TECHNICAL HANDBOOK ARTHAYASA DRESSAGE COMPETITION Events: Dressage Competition: 4-5 February, Saturday-Sunday

PRELIMINARY COMPETITION TEST A Children

IBERIAN HORSE DRESSAGE MASTERS

CONCOURS DE DRESSAGE INTERNATIONALE ~ CDI-W Y/J SAUGERTIES

SOUTH AFRICAN SHOW JUMPING (SASJ)

SCHEDULE BALTIC DRESSAGE LEAGUE LITHUANIA 2018 PLACE AND DATE OF THE EVENT

Spring Dressage Schooling Show Series - Show IV Saturday, May 19, 2018

Genetic correlations between racing performance at different racing distances in Thoroughbreds and Arab horses

Transcription:

H1.17 Is the freestyle dressage competition a reliable test of the horse s performance? A. Stachurska *1, M. Pięta 1, W. Markowski 2 and K. Czyrska 1, 1 Agricultural University, Lublin, Poland, 2 Medical University of Lublin, Poland Corresponding author: A. Stachurska - nowina@ursus.ar.lublin.pl Abstract The objective of the study has been to examine if the freestyle dressage competitions are judged reliably and the final results can be used in the horse breeding. Marks given by a judge for single movements of the dressage program were considered. The data contained 9000 marks of ten best ranked horses at seven Grand Prix classes and two Intermediate I classes from six CDI*** and one European Championships. The marks concerned 84 horses in total and were given by 25 judges. The reliability of judging was measured with the index of disagreement (ID). The index measures the disagreement of ranking by a particular judge relatively to the general ranking based on the marks of five judges. Only four judges had the mean ID lower than 10%, eight judges had it greater than 20% and the highest mean index amounted to 28.9%. The judging was less reliable in Intermediate than in Grand Prix. The average index ranged from 9.5% to 23.6% at particular classes. In both Intermediate and three Grand Prix classes the average ID of at least one judge exceeded 20%. The study shows that the results of the freestyle dressage competition should be used in the breeding with caution. The present system of judging should be permanently checked by statistic methods. Introduction The dressage performance may be considered as one of the indicators of the horse s breeding value provided it is judged reliably. The dressage qualities are particularly difficult to judge since they cannot be measured. The judges are taught how to judge during courses and seminars but there is no handbook which would precise the code point system, i.e. which mark to give for a movement executed in a certain way (Niggli, 2003). Many factors decide on the way of judging, first of all the personality of a judge: his knowledge, sport experience, training in judging, ability to concentrate for a long time, consequence, fair play, quickness of reaction etc. The position of the judge at the arena is also important. The judging should be as objective as possible, with the influence of the factors the least differentiated. The freestyle dressage competitions are run according to Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI) rules. The program consists of 15 movements which should be executed (can be repeated) in a free order and arrangement to the music of one s choice. The time is allowed from 4 30 to 6 00 according to the class. Each of five judges situated at different places around the arena (E,H,C,M,B) gives a technical mark for each movement with the use of the scale from 0 to 10. Moreover, the judge gives so-called artistic marks in the same scale for the general impression: 1) rhythm, energy and elasticity, 2) harmony between rider and horse, 3) choreography, use of arena, inventiveness, 4) degree of difficulty, well calculated risks, 5) choice of music and interpretation of the music. Some of the marks are multiplied by coefficients. The final ranking of horses in a class is made according to totals: all the marks given by the five judges. The final results are presented in per cents of the total sum which can be scored.

To state if the judging in a class is proper, particular marks for single movements must be taken into account. Two aspects should be considered: 1) if the marks from five judges agree among themselves with regard to their level 2) if the judges rank the horses in the same way. The objective of the study has been to examine if the freestyle dressage competitions are judged in agreement with regard to the ranking of the horses at particular movements and so if the final results are reliable enough to be used in the horse breeding. Material and Methods The data contained 9000 marks of ten best ranked horses at seven Grand Prix classes (GP) and two Intermediate I (INT) classes from CDI*** (Concour de Dressage Internationale), World Cup and European Championships (Tab. 1). Grand Prix Free Style Test is the most difficult class in dressage free style competitions. Intermediate I is easier by two levels. The marks concerned 90 classes made by 84 horses in total and were given by 25 judges. The coefficients and final classification at the competitions were not considered. Table 1. The freestyle classes examined Competition Year Intermediate I Grand Prix CDI*** Józefin, Poland 1997 x Volvo World Cup Gőteborg, Sweden 1998 x CDI*** Józefin, Poland 2000 x x W/CDI*** Lipica, Slovenia 2001 x CDI*** Moscow, Russia 2002 x FEI World Cup Kaposvar, Hungary 2003 x x European Championships Hicksted, Great Britain 2003 x The reliability of judging was measured with the index of disagreement (ID). The index measures the disagreement of ranking by a particular judge relatively to the general ranking based on the marks of five judges (Niewczas, Hulewicz-Stachurska, 1991, Stachurska, 1991, Stachurska et al., 2005). The latter is assumed to be proper. The fact that only ten best ranked horses were considered in each class allowed the ID measure to be identically precise in these classes because the ID level is connected with the number of horses in a class. HSD Tukey s test was used to determine the significance of differences among ID means for the judges at different positions at the arena, as well as in INT and GP classes in total. Results Table 2 shows average ID for particular judges marked with successive alphabet letters, calculated on the bases of one to six classes. Only four judges had the average ID lower than 10%, eight judges had it greater than 20% and the highest mean amounted to 28.9%.

Table 2. Average ID (%) for particular judges Number of classes judged Judges Intermediate I Grand Prix ID mean a 1 28.88 b 1 1 23.51 c 1 1 22.87 d 1 2 22.86 e 1 20.99 f 1 20.44 g 1 20.32 h 1 20.09 i 1 19.77 j 1 18.18 k 1 16.35 l 1 1 15.77 m 1 15.69 n 1 5 15.66 o 2 15.52 p 1 15.33 q 1 3 15.07 r 1 3 14.66 s 1 11.88 t 2 11.69 u 1 10.05 v 1 9.03 w 1 8.52 x 2 9.13 y 1 5.50 The ID varied according to the position of the judge at the arena (Table 3). The differences were more pronounced in case of INT classes than GP classes. The main judges at C position had the lowest ID mean. A slight tendency can be noticed: judges at H and M had it greater, whereas at E and B average ID was the greatest. In INT classes ID mean was greater than in GP classes (P 0.01). The little number of significant differences results from the fact the standard deviation (SD) was great. It means the IDs varied to great extent in particular movements. Table 3. Average ID (%) at various positions at the arena Judge s position at the arena Total Classes E H C M B Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD IntermediateI 24.88 15.23 18.58 16.12 16.48 14.29 17.17 14.17 19.98 17.01 19.42B 15.54 Grand Prix 16.59 17.23 16.97 16.54 12.68 14.75 15.09 15.62 15.52 17.30 15.37B 16.34 Total 18.43a 17.12 17.33 16.42 13.53a 14.69 15.55 15.30 16.51 17.29 16.27 16.24 The difference between means marked with the same letters is significant at: small letters - P 0.05, capitals - P 0.01.

The average ID ranged from 9.5% to 23.6% at particular classes (Tab. 4). In both Intermediate and three Grand Prix classes the average ID of at least one judge exceeded 20%. Table 4. Average ID (%) in the classes at particular competitions Intermediate I Grand Prix Competition E H C M B Mean E H C M B Mean Józefin 1997 14.9 11.5 13.4 20.1 16.4 15.3 Gőteborg 1998 6.4 12.5 8.9 10.0 10.1 9.5 Józefin 2000 28.8 24.7 19.0 16.7 28.9 23.6 18.3 29.5 15.0 20.4 26.7 22.0 Lipica 2001 22.3 20.3 20.1 15.6 19.8 19.6 Moscow 2002 14.4 13.1 9.4 5.5 11.9 10.8 Kaposvar 2003 21.0 12.4 13.9 17.7 11.1 15.2 21.8 17.6 13.0 18.6 15.4 17.2 Hicksted 2003 18.2 14.3 9.0 15.3 8.5 13.0 Discussion The fact that the ID of 25 judges is so differentiated indicates there are some experienced, fair judges and there are also judges who do not judge quite correctly. The latter should perhaps train more, participate at additional courses and pass examinations. The ID may be used as an objective and quantitative scale at such examinations. The differences among the judges more pronounced and the ID greater in the lower classes may indicate the judging was less reliable in them than in Grand Prix. However, the two INT classes were judged differently. More classes should be examined to prove if the judging in lower free style classes is less qualified. Usually Grand Prix classes are judged by more experienced judges but it is equally important the younger or less trained horses in Intermediate are judged fairly, as well. The positions of the judges at the arena suggest that marks by H, C and M judges should vary the least among one another, like between E and B judges. Instead, the marks by H, C, M versus E and B should differ the most. The results show such tendency. It is important for a judge if he watches a movement from in front of him or from a side. Not quite the same elements of the execution are judged then. Generally, the C judge sees the greater part of the programme symmetrically and a lot of movements are presented in front of him. The other thing is the distance from which a judge watches the movements. Once it is e.g. 5 m, once 60 m. Both the judges and the riders ought to realize this fact that should be also taken into account in examining the judges. Average ID in the classes indicates the quality of judging differs at particular competitions. On the bases of the examined competitions it cannot be stated that the judging actually improves. The study shows that the results of the freestyle dressage competition should be used in the breeding with caution. The present system of judging should be permanently checked by statistic methods which may help to improve its quality.

Bibliography Niewczas J., Hulewicz-Stachurska A., 1991: Metoda oceny wyników sędziowania konkursów ujeżdżenia dla potrzeb hodowlanych. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie- Sklodowska, Sectio EE, IX, 22: 177-185. Niggli W.M., 2003: Dressage. A guideline for Riders and Judges. J.A. Allen, London. Stachurska A., 1991: Analiza i ocena konkursów ujeżdżenia jako hodowlanych prób użytkowości koni wierzchowych. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Sectio EE, IX, 21: 163-175. Stachurska A., Niewczas J., Markowski W., 2005: An estimation of reliability of judging the horse dressage competitions. EAAP Meeting, Uppsala, 2005.