Alberta Conservation Association 2018/19 Project Summary Report. Project Name: Upland Gamebird Studies Upland Gamebird Productivity Surveys

Similar documents
Alberta Conservation Association (ACA) Date: Project Name: Taber Pheasant Festival. Wildlife Program Manager: Doug Manzer

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report

Alberta Conservation Association 2015/16 Project Summary Report

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report

Alberta Conservation Association 2017/18 Project Summary Report

Alberta Conservation Association 2011/12 Project Summary Report. Velma Hudson, Julie Landry-DeBoer, Jim Potter, Amanda Rezansoff and Ken Wright

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report. Primary ACA staff on project: Stefanie Fenson, Jeff Forsyth and Jon Van Dijk

Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

FLATHEAD INDIAN RESERVATION

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

2008 WMU 106 mule deer

2012 Wildlife Studies

Alberta Conservation Association 2017/18 Project Summary Report

Project Name: Distribution and Abundance of the Migratory Bull Trout Population in the Castle River Drainage (Year 4 of 4)

A pheasant researcher notebook:

The Department's Upland Game Bird Specialist Tests Your Knowledge Of the Wily Ring-Neck

Spring 2012 Wild Turkey Harvest Report

2018 MINNESOTA PRAIRIE-CHICKEN HARVEST SURVEY

Introduction. Introduction 4/4/2011. Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) population decline. Breeding Bird Survey

Hunter use of public-access lands in the Rainwater Basin and beyond

021 Deer Management Unit

Alberta Conservation Association 2013/14 Project Summary Report

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Pheasant Brood Survey Report 2016

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report

FERN RIDGE WILDLIFE AREA 2009 Season Summary YOUTH UPLAND HUNT AND WESTERN OREGON FEE PHEASANT HUNT PROGRAM

CAMERA SURVEYS: HELPING MANAGERS AVOID THE PITFALLS

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Deer Management Unit 152

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

Public Consultation Document

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

SMALL GAME 2016 /2017 NEW HAMPSHIRE SUMMARY REPORT NEW HAMPSHIRE FISH AND GAME DEPARTMENT. huntnh.com

The Berggren Plan Nebraska s Plan to Improve Pheasant Hunting. John Laux, NGPC RWBJV Informational Seminar February 2, 2017

Summary report on all harvested species on Patuxent Research Refuge from September 1 - January 31, 2017 Deer Harvest

Quagga Mussel Update Lake Powell

Opportunities for Promoting Hunting, Angling and Conservation in Strathcona County Dr. Todd Zimmerling, M.Sc., PhD., P.Biol.

Proposed Upland Game Bird Regulations

Hunting for Sustainability Conservation and local, free-range protein. Keith Warnke WDNR

Alberta Conservation Association 2015/16 Project Summary Report

Deer Management Unit 249

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Chapter Coverts Chapter Newsletter- New England

Deer Management Unit 252

Susquehanna River Walleye Fishery

STATUS OF WILDLIFE POPULATIONS, FALL 2008

Acquisition & Protection

Impact on Base Population Density and Hunter Performance of Stocking with Pen-Raised Bobwhite

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Jason Blackburn, Paul Hvenegaard, Dave Jackson, Tyler Johns, Chad Judd, Scott Seward and Juanna Thompson

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. February 2, 2016

Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos

Alberta Waterfowl Crop Damage Prevention Program, 2009

AGENDA Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission Regular Meeting

Come Enjoy the Hunting Experience at Rocky Ridge.

ALBERTA HEN HOUSE SUPER SITE PROJECT. GRANT #1.2.1aa-09/10

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

Alberta Conservation Association 2009/10 Project Summary Report. Project Name: Crowsnest Drainage Sport Fish Population Assessment Phase 1

LITTLE SALMON AND MAGUNDY RIVERS

Western Great Lakes Region FAN UPDATE

Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Performance Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July June IS 0 N

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

Nevada Department of Wildlife Predator Management Plan Fiscal Year 2018

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

MODULE 2. Conservation needs of cheetah and wild dogs and related threats to their survival. Notes:

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

Early History, Prehistory

Deer Management Unit 255

Oregon Upland Game Bird Hunting Season Framework

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer

The ruffed grouse population cycle. defying the best attempts of wildlife biologists to understand it. rn y grou.<c trnil rum fo< mib on public lmd,

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Jonny Williams of Cody with his first rabbit harvested during an outing with Forever Wild Families.

Conservation and the Use of Wildlife Resources

2008 WMU 359 moose, mule deer, and white tailed deer

contents 2004 Big Game Statistics

Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2010

Home range size and habitat preference of pen-raised ring-neck pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) released at Lancaster County Central Park.

Alberta Conservation Association 2018/19 Project Summary Report

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

The Value of Springs to The Petersen Ranch

The 2009 Montana Wolf Hunting Season

! CHAPTER NEWSLETTER September 13, 2017

Report of Thailand on significant trade in specimens of appendix-ii species (Naja naja spp.)

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer

Women in Shooting Sports Survey Results

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. January 24-28, 2019

Transcription:

Alberta Conservation Association 2018/19 Project Summary Report Project Name: Upland Gamebird Studies Upland Gamebird Productivity Surveys Wildlife Program Manager: Doug Manzer Project Leader: Kyle Prince Primary ACA staff on project: Aiden Bateman, Jalen Hulit, Kyle Prince, Layne Seward, Mike Uchikura, and Emily Williams Partnerships Landowners Pheasants Forever Calgary Chapter Volunteers Dog Handlers Alberta Environment and Parks Key Findings Our late summer surveys indicate below average production for both pheasants and grey partridge in 2018. We flushed 1.54 pheasants per hour, which translates to 1.93 pheasants for each kilometre walked over 29 hours of survey time. We flushed 0.82 grey partridge per hour, which translates to 2.25 partridge for each kilometre walked over 29 hours of survey time. We increased our survey effort in 2018 walking 67 km of habitat; however, we had the lowest total count of each species (n = 129 pheasant, n = 151 grey partridge) since initiating these surveys in 2012. 1

Introduction Since 2012, we have conducted productivity surveys in late summer to gain a measure of annual reproductive success for grey partridge and ring-necked pheasant. The information acquired from these surveys helps us understand population trends, and brood success, as well as inform hunters looking for an indication of breeding success leading up to the hunting season. We release survey results on our website and other social media outlets such as Facebook, each fall. We engage a group of volunteers that participate in the surveys, and interact with landowners from one year to the next helping them to better understand how habitat and weather patterns can lead to changes in bird numbers. These surveys provide a means to build interest in upland hunting as well as a platform to discuss their habitat needs. Methods The surveys occur in late summer and early fall to coincide with crop harvest. Once an area is harvested, it allows for higher levels of bird detection in the permanent cover that border the farmland. The survey sites include large coulee systems that harbour a mix of native and tame grasses, fruit bearing shrubs, creeks, and cattail sections, often bordered by crop land. Trained bird dogs are used to search areas of prime habitat, generally coulee systems, to seek out and flush birds. Surveys occur after sunrise during the cool morning weather and typically last from two to four hours depending on conditions. Each flush location is recorded using a handheld GPS. The trained dogs are equipped with Garmin Astro 320 GPS-enabled dog collars that track the distance covered during the survey. The survey time and distance covered are recorded to calculate indices such as flushes/hour which can be easily communicated to hunters. The surveys are intended to mimic hunting scenarios allowing the dog and handler to cover ground as they see fit, to flush the most birds possible. A variety of dogs and handlers are involved in the surveys which offers different levels of search effort and ability giving realistic results that hunters can expect to see in the upcoming hunting season. 2

Results Our late summer upland surveys indicate below average counts for ring-necked pheasant and grey partridge in 2018. The flush rate for pheasants is down from last year and similar to the lows we saw in 2012. The flush rate for partridge is also down and the lowest we ve observed since initiating these surveys in 2012. Overall, we flushed 129 pheasants and 151 partridge while covering 67 km over 29 hours of effort. It is notable this has also been the highest level of effort put into the surveys since their inception. The dogs encountered 1.5 pheasant and 0.8 partridge flushes per hour (single or covey). Averaged over the entire sample period this equates to roughly 2.3 flushes of either partridge or pheasant per hour. For each kilometre walked surveyors flushed 1.93 pheasants and 2.25 partridge, which is the lowest on record for both species since starting these surveys in 2012 (Table 1 and Table 2). Table 1. Total counts and encounter rates for ring-necked pheasant during late summer surveys from 2012 to 2018. Survey results Ring-necked pheasant Survey year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Distance Surveyed (km) 53.6 60 30 46 47 46 67 Total count 111 215 73 155 263 163 129 Flushes/hour 1.37 2.59 1.96 2.44 3.32 2.23 1.54 Birds/km walked 2.07 3.58 2.43 3.37 5.60 3.54 1.93 3

Table 2. Total counts and encounter rates for grey partridge during the late summer surveys from 2012-2018. Survey results Grey partridge Survey year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Distance Surveyed (km) 53.6 60 30 46 47 46 67 Total count 354 420 397 292 159 214 151 Flushes/hour 1.37 1.59 3.53 2.15 0.83 0.96 0.82 Birds/km walked 6.6 7 13.2 6.35 3.38 4.65 2.25 Conclusions Encounter rates and overall numbers were lower than average, and for grey partridge the lowest observed since initiating these surveys in 2012. In many locations this past winter was the worst seen in over 30 years. After a severe winter and late wet spring, it s no surprise that counts are lower. These results reflect on a year with high winter mortality entering spring 2018, followed by poor recruitment, especially for grey partridge. An optimistic view acknowledges that any survival after such challenging living conditions is encouraging and demonstrates the value of high-quality habitat. Communications The pheasant population survey results were published on ACA s website and communicated via social media. Results were also shared with Pheasant Forever Calgary, who further shared this information with its members via an e-newsletter and through hard copies mailed out to members. 4

Literature Cited None Photos Chokecherry provides excellent vertical structure for game birds, as well as a valued food resource. Photo: Kyle Prince German short-haired pointer on point in excellent upland habitat. Photo: Kyle Prince 5

Volunteer s English Setter on point. Photo: Aiden Bateman Volunteer s English Setter once again on point in great habitat. Photo: Aiden Bateman 6