TMP Oversight and Outreach Committee Meeting Date: 4/23/2019 Staff Report Number: TMP

Similar documents
DETAILED PROJECT LIST

TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Review Citywide Recommendations, Updated List and Scoring Methodology December 6, 2018

AGENDA ITEM G-2 Public Works

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

Public Works AGENDA ITEM D-2 STAFF REPORT

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

SUBJECT Memorandum of Understanding to Complete a Caltrain Grade Separation Study for the Whipple Avenue Crossing

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

BD RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE VISION ZERO RAMP INTERSECTION STUDY PHASE 1

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Recommendations. Central Salem Mobility Study

Foothill Expressway Improvements Between El Monte and San Antonio

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

San Jose Transportation Policy

Board-Approved Funding Awards for Cycle 4 Active Transportation Grant Program Projects (in Order of Project Rankings) Approved on

Project Goal and Description. Why Broadway? Broadway SFMTA.COM/BROADWAY. The goal of the Broadway Safety Improvement

FOLSOM-HOWARD STREETSCAPE OVERVIEW

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Lincoln Neighborhood Corridor Plan The LiNC

Feasibility Study. Expo-Downtown Bicycle Connector

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

C C C

Summary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

MOBILITY WORKSHOP. Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

REVIEW OF LOCAL TRAFFIC FLOW / LONG RANGE PLANNING SOLUTIONS STUDY

Oakland Pedestrian Master Plan Oakland Pedestrian Plan Draft Recommendations Chapter Outline

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

City of Sammamish. Welcome. Issaquah-Fall City Road Improvements Project Phase I Design: 242nd Avenue SE to Klahanie Drive SE

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

CITY OF ALBANY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY COMMISSION

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

RapidRide Roosevelt Seat Sea t t le t le Depa De r pa t r men men t of Sept T an r sp an or sp t or a t t a ion

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

TOWN OF IRONDEQUOIT ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

CRESTON ROAD COMPLETE AND SUSTAINABLE STREETS CORRIDOR PLAN

Welcome to the Open House

Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

Make Lincoln Highway an economically vibrant corridor that is safe, efficient, and beautiful for local residents and visitors.

Saskatchewan Drive Roadway Rehabilitation and Shared-Use Path Widening

WEST AND SOUTH WEST RING ROAD DOWNSTREAM TRAFFIC IMPACTS

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

California Department of Transportation, District 4. Sloat Boulevard Project Skyline Blvd. to 19 th Ave. Community Update January 13, 2016

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

Freeway ramp intersection study

AGENDA ITEM H-3 Public Works

TOWN OF MORAGA MORAGA WAY AND CAMINO PABLO/CANYON ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Town Council Meeting March 13, 2019

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

3.3 Transportation/Traffic

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Multi-Modal Traffic Analysis. Parisi and Associates

FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2011

Executive Summary. September 3, 2014

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Princeton Avenue and Spruce Street Transportation and Site Access Enhancements Project

Clay Street Bridge Replacement Project

PRESS RELEASE San Joaquin Council of Governments

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Coquitlam Cross-town Bike Route Improving Bicycle Facilities in a Mature Suburban Environment

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

State Street and Pierce Park Lane Intersection Concept Report

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

Purpose: Financial Implications and Impact Statement: It is estimated that the cost to implement:

Ravenswood Avenue Railroad Crossing Project Community Outreach Meeting Presentation May 2, Ravenswood Avenue Railroad Crossing Project

Short-Term Enhancements Improvements to keep Austin moving. MetroRapid

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

Outreach Approach RENEW SF served as the primary liaison with the North Beach community; the Chinatown. Executive Summary

Transcription:

AGENDA ITEM C-2 Public Works STAFF REPORT TMP Oversight and Outreach Committee Meeting Date: 4/23/2019 Staff Report Number: 18-008-TMP Regular Business: Provide feedback and recommend to City Council approval of the prioritization strategy for projects identified for the Transportation Master Plan Recommendation Staff requests feedback from the Oversight and Outreach Committee (the Committee) and recommendation to City Council regarding the prioritization strategy for the projects identified for the Transportation Master Plan. Policy Issues The development of a Transportation Master Plan was included as one of the top six priority projects in the City Council s adopted 2018 work plan and was included again as one of the top five priorities in the 2019 work plan. It was also one of the highest priority implementation programs in the 2016 general plan circulation element. The Committee will help guide the Transportation Master Plan process to a successful completion. Background The Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Program is the highest priority program following the adoption of the ConnectMenlo general plan land use and circulation elements in November 2016. An abbreviated summary of the work to-date is provided below; more detail is available on the project website (menlopark.org/tmp) and in the most recent City Council staff report (Attachment A). The TMP process was kicked off in June 2017 and started with outreach events during the summer and fall of 2017 to collect community feedback on transportation issues within the City. City Council also appointed the 11-member Oversight and Outreach Committee (Committee) in August 2017. The Committee s roles and responsibilities are outlined in Attachment B. Staff has met with the Committee seven times from October 2017 to December 2018, reviewing the goals, prioritization criteria and most recently, the draft strategies and recommendations. Since the Committee meeting on December 6, 2018, the City Council has taken two actions on the TMP: February 12, 2019: Modified the scope of work and next steps in response to Committee feedback in December 2018 March 26, 2019: Modified the goals of the TMP to incorporate Congestion Management, as detailed below. Referred the prioritization strategy to the Committee for consideration at their April 23, 2019 meeting. The four goals of the TMP are: 1. Safety: Vision Zero Eliminate traffic fatalities and reduce the number of non-fatal collisions by 50% by City of Menlo Park 701 Laurel St., Menlo Park, CA 94025 tel 650-330-6600 www.menlopark.org

Staff Report #: 18-008-TMP 2040. 2. Sustainability: Enable the City to meet the goals of the Climate Action Plan, including a 27 percent greenhouse gas emission reduction. 3. Choice: Design transportation projects to accommodate all modes and people of all abilities. Encourage the use of lower emission modes such as walking, biking and transit. 4. Congestion Management: Manage traffic congestion to reduce travel time on City streets and minimize cut-through traffic on neighborhood streets, including the encouragement of the use of lower emission modes such as walking, biking, and transit, and prioritizing the safety of children, seniors, and the public. Analysis In order to help facilitate feedback from the Committee on the prioritization strategy, staff and the consultant team have prepared a workbook for this meeting (Attachment C). The workbook includes a description of staff s proposed prioritization strategy, how it would be applied, and provides information on how the strategy has evolved to incorporate community feedback over the past several weeks. The strategy was modified to simplify the process and to provide a better visual indication of how projects meet the different criteria. The workbook also reiterates the purpose and goals of the TMP and the roles and responsibilities of the Committee for context, and provides a summary of the connection of the Committee s action to next steps in the TMP development and the upcoming community engagement efforts. Questions to prompt Committee members on key areas of consideration and feedback at the April 23, 2019 meeting are provided. Staff recommends Committee members use the workbook to prepare for the meeting. Committee members are welcomed to send staff questions to clarify materials or provide additional information in advance of the meeting. Prior proposals of the prioritization strategy included numerical values for each criterion and grouping of the projects by implementation timing and cost. Staff and the consultant team have modified the prioritization strategy based on feedback received from the Committee, City Council and members of the public to simplify the process and to provide a better visual indication of how projects meet the different criteria and builds on the implementation groups. The projects are identified on whether they do not meet, partially meet or fully meet each criteria. Then, the projects are separated into two tiers. The Tier 1 projects are projects that fully meet one or more of the key criteria, including safety, congestion management, greenhouse gas reduction, transportation sustainability, and schools and provide a transportation network connection. Thirty-one of the projects have been identified as Tier 1 and they are shown on the map in Attachment D and summarized in the tables in Attachment E. Tier 1 projects are the high priority projects that the City would plan to implement first and as funding and staffing resources are available. The remaining projects are considered Tier 2 Opportunity projects. The Tier 2 projects are still important to the transportation network, but are considered lower priority and would be implemented over time and when there are opportunities to include the projects such as when a street is being repaved or an adjacent property is being developed. The Tier 2 projects are summarized in the tables included in Attachment F. Next Steps and Schedule The consultant team has also started preparing the cost estimates for the projects to include in the TIF program, and staff met with the Complete Streets Commission (CSC) TMP subcommittee to get initial feedback on the regrouping and reorganizing of the project list. The CSC subcommittee also provided additional feedback on bicycle routes and how they would connect various destinations within the city which staff is incorporating into the prioritization criteria. Staff has also been working on responses to Committee member Barnes questions and will have a separate document ready at a later date. City of Menlo Park 701 Laurel St., Menlo Park, CA 94025 tel 650-330-6600 www.menlopark.org

Staff Report #: 18-008-TMP Following this meeting, staff will be returning to the City Council for their approval of the prioritization strategy. An online survey and community open house would follow. The project schedule had previously targeted an online survey and community open house for May/June 2019, however, the schedule has been pushed back in order to allow for additional feedback from the Committee on the prioritization strategy. In the past, the City has tried to avoid holding community meetings during the summer due to vacation schedules and potential for less community engagement. Staff is recommending that the Committee provide a recommendation on whether the project proceed with moving forward with the project and including a community workshop during the summer or to delay the community workshop to the fall. Below is the proposed project schedule, assuming community engagement proceeds over the summer months, currently anticipated to occur in July. If engagement is delayed until fall, adoption of the TMP is anticipated to occur in spring 2020, an approximate 3 to 4 month delay: Table 1: Proposed project schedule Task Schedule Committee meeting No. 8 review of prioritization strategy April 23, 2019 City Council approval of prioritization strategy May 21, 2019 Community workshop and online open house July 2019 City Council study session of draft TIF Program update May 21, 2019 (tentative) City Council adoption of TIF Program update Fall 2019 Committee meeting No. 9 and CSC review of draft TMP Fall 2019 City Council review and adoption of TMP End of 2019 Major project milestone accomplishments and deliverables will continue to be posted on the City project website (menlopark.org/tmp). Public Notice Public notification was achieved by posting the agenda, with the agenda items being listed, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Additional notifications are being made through a Public Works List email blast, a NextDoor post and a City Council Digest article. Attachments A. City Council staff report Hyperlink: menlopark.org/documentcenter/view/21090/i2-20190326-tmp- CC?bidId= B. Committee s Roles and Responsibilities C. OOC Meeting #8 Workbook D. Tier 1 project map E. Tier 1 project tables F. Tier 2 project tables Report prepared by: Kristiann Choy, Senior Transportation Engineer City of Menlo Park 701 Laurel St., Menlo Park, CA 94025 tel 650-330-6600 www.menlopark.org

Staff Report #: 18-008-TMP Report reviewed by: Nicole H. Nagaya, Assistant Public Works Director City of Menlo Park 701 Laurel St., Menlo Park, CA 94025 tel 650-330-6600 www.menlopark.org

ATTACHMENT B Transportation Master Plan Oversight and Outreach Committee Roles and Responsibilities Provide advisory input and recommendations to the consultant and staff regarding the outreach process and draft Master Plan materials and submittals Guide and keep the project process on track to meet the key milestones Reach out to community members to share content and encourage participation at community engagement activities such as workshops/meetings and other planning activities

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

ATTACHMENT C OOC Meeting #8 April 23, 2019

This workbook contains background information and key decision items pertaining to the evaluation and ranking of projects for the TMP and moving into the public feedback phase of the project. The workbook contains: Review of the purpose and status of the TMP Details on the upcoming public outreach effort Description of prioritization framework and methodology Key questions to guide decision-making during the OOC meeting Following the OOC meeting, the planning team will take into account the committee s recommendations and finalize the prioritization system for approval by City Council and presentation to the community. The team will also consider any OOC recommendations regarding the public outreach phase. Please review and complete this workbook by the April 23, 2019 OOC meeting and come prepared to discuss your recommendations with the committee. 1

OOC Role and Responsibilities Provide advisory input and recommendations to the consultant and staff regarding the outreach process and draft Master Plan materials and submittals. Guide and keep the project process on track to meet the key milestones. Reach out to community members to share content and encourage participation at community engagement activities such as workshops/meetings and other planning activities. 2

Purpose of the TMP In 2016, the City of Menlo Park adopted ConnectMenlo, an update to the Land Use and Circulation elements of its General Plan. The Circulation Element program included preparation of a Transportation Master Plan (TMP) that includes roadway system improvements and updates to the Bicycle Master Plan and Sidewalk Master Plan. The TMP will bridge the Circulation Element s policy framework and individual improvement projects by: Identifying a comprehensive list of citywide infrastructure projects and strategic programs to enhance the transportation network Ranking individual projects and programs for implementation using goals and criteria identified by the community Identifying potential funding options for implementation, including updating the Transportation Impact Fee Program. The TMP will provide a roadmap for the implementation of needed improvements, showing how each improvement fits into the context of the City s goals and in relation to one another. By providing this context and prioritization of projects, it will improve efficiency, shorten implementation timelines, and improve the City s effectiveness in pursuing funding opportunities. The TMP is a planning document and each of the projects in the TMP will need to go through its own design, outreach and construction phase. The TMP is also a living document that can be updated as priorities and transportation conditions change. Goals of the TMP Safety Vision Zero Eliminate traffic fatalities and reduce the number of non-fatal collisions by 50% by 2040. Sustainability Enable the City to meet the goals of the Climate Action Plan, including a 27 percent greenhouse gas emission reduction from 2005 levels by 2020. Choice Design transportation projects to accommodate all modes and people of all abilities. Encourage the use of lower emission modes such as walking, biking and transit. Congestion Management Manage traffic congestion to reduce travel time on City streets and minimize cut-through traffic on neighborhood streets, including the encouragement of the use of lower emission modes such as walking, biking, and transit, and prioritizing the safety of children, seniors, and the public. 3

The Planning Process We are here! Initiation Transportation Data Summary Community Engagement: Vision & Goals Strategies & Recommendations Working Paper Prioritization Community Engagement: Strategies & Recommendations Draft TIF Draft TMP Adoption Once the prioritization system is finalized following this OOC meeting and approved by City Council, the planning team will present the recommended improvements and prioritization system to the public. The team will then consider the public s feedback and produce a draft TMP for Planning Commission and City Council review. Public Outreach The upcoming public outreach phase will consist of the following activities: Online Survey and Open House The City will build a website for community members to learn about the project and provide input on the recommendations. The site will feature a map-based tool to help community members sort through different categories of projects and find the projects that matter most to them. Bike routes for key destinations in the city will also be mapped. Community Open House The Open House will be an opportunity for community members to visit various stations to learn about the TMP and the recommendations and interact with the planning team while leaving feedback on the prioritized list of projects. Additional Outreach Events The City will plan up to three supplemental outreach activities to reach community members who are not already participating the the process. This could include pop-up meetings, briefings to neighborhood groups, or other activities. The results of the online survey and a summary of feedback received through the various activities will be available for the public and decision-makers to review prior to adoption of the TMP. Q1: Do you have any questions about the planning process or schedule? Q2: What information do you think should be highlighted for public input? Q3: Do you have any recommendations for making the TMP materials more accessible to the public? Q4: What kind of feedback would be most helpful to get from the public? Q5: Do you have any ideas for increasing public participation? How are you able to help? Q6: Do you have any suggestions for the supplemental outreach activities? Q7: Should we hold the community open house during the summer or wait until fall? 4

What will the TMP look like? The TMP will be drafted with the following elements: Statement of Goals Identification of key issues for walking, bicycling, driving, and transit use in Menlo Park based on information from working paper and community input Discussion of strategies to address key issues and achieve goals Prioritized list of projects Implementation Plan How will the TMP be used? The TMP will help Public Works staff and decision makers answer these important implementation questions: What are we building? In what order? How will we fund it? 5

Prioritization and Implementation What are we building? In what order? 190+ Total Recommended s How will we fund it? Local Funds 124 projects are sorted into five categories based on scale and complexity. These 124 projects do not include citywide, funded, or deleted/removed projects. Categories Large Infrastructure Complex Design Complex Outreach Straightforward Regional Regional projects are not ranked but would be built in coordination with other agencies. s in these three categories are ranked according to their abilities to meet the community s goals. The highest ranked projects are prioritized as Tier 1. All other projects are Tier 2. Straightforward projects are not ranked and would be built through an annual program in the City s operating budget. Priorities Tier 1 Tier 2 Discretionary TIF/Fees Grants/ Taxes A variety of funding sources go to support the Capital Program 2018-19 CIP Budget 24% Streets & Sidewalks 15% Transportation The CIP Budget includes funding for all projects in the CIP including streets & sidewalks and transportation projects Implementation Plan Funding and priorities are matched. Available funding is allocated to projects according to priority and opportunity. If additional funding needs are identified, the City may pursue additional sources. Council would adopt the funding plan and priorities annually. 6

Background Prioritization helps the City to organize the long list of projects. By categorizing and ranking the projects, the City can focus efforts and resources on projects that best meet the goals of the TMP. The framework was developed through an iterative process including feedback from the City Council. An earlier version of the framework was included in the Strategies and Recommendations Working Paper that considered the seven criteria listed on the next page. The framework also used a numerical scoring system. However, even with this prioritization system, City staff heard feedback that the long list of projects remained difficult to navigate. The prioritization framework has since been revised to simplify the process and better align the project list with the City s five-year Capital s Program (CIP), beginning by grouping the long list of projects into five categories based on implementation timing and cost. s could then be prioritized within their categories, removing the competition for resources between projects that can be implemented quickly and those that would require more dedicated staff time, effort, and financial resources. The scoring system has also been simplified to use a qualitative scale that considers a projects overall abilitity to meet the criteria rather than a numerical system. The framework is diagrammed on page 6 and described in more detail below. Categories s were sorted into the following five categories based on their scale, complexity, and cost: Large Infrastructure s that require more design and outreach and cost more than $1 million Complex Outreach s that require more outreach due to on-street parking removal Complex Design s that require more design, but cost less than $1 million Straightforward s that are easy to implement and lower in costs Regional s where the City would not be the Lead Agency The Regional and Straightforward categories were not prioritized. Regional projects are those for which the City of Menlo Park would not be the Lead Agency, and the City would need to work collaboratively with other agencies to implement them. The Regional projects were all determined to be of great significance to achieving the goals of the TMP. The Straightforward projects would be easy to implement and lower in cost. The Straightforward projects are planned to be implemented in an annual program over a five-year time period. 7

Prioritization Criteria s in the Large Infrastructure, Complex Design, and Complex Outreach categories were scored based on how well they match the following criteria, which were based on the goals of the TMP and refined with input from the OOC and City Council. Safety s that improve safety and close gaps in the pedestrian and bicycle network. The safety benefit of each project was assessed based on location-specific collision history and safety countermeasures approved by the Federal Highway Administration. Congestion Management s that manage congestion and minimize cut-through traffic. These projects were evaluated based on the anticipated magnitude of benefit to residents and drivers in Menlo Park. Where data was readily available, the magnitude of benefit was estimated. Congestion management projects include roadway geometry changes, traffic signal modifications, signalization of existing unsignalized intersections, grade separation at railway crossings, and grade separation of highways and intersections. Greenhouse Gas reduction & Person Throughput s that promote fewer emissions and help to achieve the City s Climate Action Plan goals. The projects were evaluated based on the anticipated reduction in vehicle miles traveled with respect to mode shift away from single occupant vehicle trips made within Menlo Park. Transportation Sustainability s that promote the use of bicycles, pedestrian, and public transit modes. Additional consideration was given to projects that promote multiple modes and non-single occupant vehicle travel. School Nearby s that improve access and accommodate all travel modes to and from a school. s near schools were evaluated based on their relative benefit of improving access to schools in conjunction with their proximity to campuses throughout Menlo Park. Sensitive Population s located near daycares or senior centers, and within a Community of Concern, as defined by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Green Stormwater Infrastructure s that provide ways to incorporate green stormwater infrastructure. The projects were assessed on the anticipated level of opportunity to incorporate green infrastructure when feasible into existing and new transportation infrastructure projects. 8

Scoring System Example Tiers Tier Safety* Congestion Management* GHG Reduction/Person Throughput* Transportation Sustainability* School Nearby* Sensitive Population Green Infrastructure After being ranked using the prioritization criteria, the 85 projects in the Large Infrastructure, Complex Design, and Complex Outreach categories were prioritized into Tier 1 and Tier 2 projects. Tier 1 Tier 1 projects are anticipated to have the greatest impact in achieving the goals of the TMP and would significantly benefit transportation network users by fully meeting at least one of the key prioritization criteria and provide a transportation network connection. 31 of the 85 projects in the Large Infrastructure, Complex Design, and Complex Outreach categories were designated as Tier 1 projects. 1 A Tier 2 1 B 2 C Tier 2 Opportunity projects are also anticipated to help achieve the goals of the TMP but do not fully meet any of the prioritization criteria. Tier 2 projects would be implemented over time and when there are opportunities to include the projects such as when a street is being repaved or an adjacent property is being developed. 54 projects in the Large Infrastructure, Complex Design, and Complex Outreach categories were designated as Tier 2 projects. 2 D Q8: Do you have any questions or concerns regarding the methodology? 2 E = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria EMPTY = Did Not Meet Criteria *Key Criteria 9

Implementation The prioritized project list and funding sources would inform implemenation of the projects as part of the Capital s Program. The example programming table illustrates how projects could be scheduled for phases of conceptual design, environmental review, and construction. It is illustrative in nature only, and does not represent the available funds, staff resources, or recommended planned projects for next fiscal year. Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Large Infrastructure s 78 Ravenswood Caltrain Crossing DD/Env DD/Env DD/Env DD/Env DD/Env 47 Willow Rd & Middlefield Rd CD DD/Env DD/Env Constr 84 El Camino Real CD DD/Env DD/Env Complex Outreach s 118 Middle Ave. from University to Olive 129 Olive from Oak Ave. to Santa Cruz 107 Oak Grove from University to Crane 189 University between Oak Grove and Santa Cruz Complex Design s CD DD/Env Constr CD DD/Env Constr CD DD/Env Constr CD DD/Env Constr 40 Willow Rd & O Brien Dr. CD DD/Env DD/Env Constr 39 Willow Rd & Ivy Dr. CD DD/Env DD/Env Constr 70 Middlefield Rd & Woodland Ave. CD DD/Env DD/Env Constr 144 Sand Hill Rd & Santa Cruz Ave. CD DD/Env Constr 44 Willow Rd from Bay to O Keefe CD CD Straightforward s EXAMPLE CD Conceptual Design/ Outreach DD/Env Detailed Design/ Environmental Review Constr Construction 10

EX NT 84 5 22 CHILCO ST 14 24 23 BA YR D Route # Spot EN Class II Bike Lane 76 OA Class III Bike Route 76 Class IV Separated Bikeway AV E AI PA R 189 ZA VE 70 1 MILE RE AL 134 MO NT E DD LE AV E L 69 118 129 ND City of Menlo Park O W LO RD MI SA NT A Park D 65 RD LL HI RD SA 82 L RD SAND HIL 134 1 MILE Funded and Tier 1 Priority s RO SA SHARON PARK DR E AV Menlo Park Destination IN 117 ER 119 SI TY DR 59 IEL WI 59 UZ PU Future Street Connection LG AS School/University EF 47 75 EL81 CA M 59 59 DL 79 113 U NI V CR U Caltrain Station LEM A 61 N AVE 44 R TA C SAN VA L Library 78 107 SO City Hall CO 74 84 Basemap LA S BAY RD 42 63 64 MID N DR RIE 109 RIN CI Class I Bike Path E 40 GW OO 82 K GR OV RA EA VE VE NS WO OD AV E Spot Existing Bike Network LA VE # NA Route 39 41 29 Funded s # NEWBRI DG ES T 10 114 24IVY DR DA VE # TON AVE HAMIL 26 144 DR 146 E RD ALPIN Tier 1 s 8 UNIVERSITY AVE 4 BA YF RO ION DR O'B RD MA RS H CON 15 STIT3U T D 178 WR 2 LO 1 WIL HAVE N A VE PY ATTACHMENT D

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

ATTACHMENT E LARGE INFRASTRUCTURE TIER 1 PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 1 Haven Ave from Marsh Rd to Haven Court Bayfront Expy Multimodal Construct Class I Multi-Use Path from Marsh Rd to Atherton Channel Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes from Haven Court to Atherton Channel Install Bicycle and Pedestrian crossing upgrades 2 Bayfront Expy & Marsh Rd Bayfront Expy Multimodal Recommended s Modify southbound Haven Ave to left turn, shared through-right and right-turn lane Install Bicycle and Pedestrian crossing upgrades Funded Widen eastbound Marsh Rd to 3 right turn lanes Install crosswalk and pedestrian signal heads on south Bayfront Expy leg Install Class I Multi-Use Path along eastbound Marsh Rd Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

LARGE INFRASTRUCTURE TIER 1 PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 8 Bayfront Expy & Willow Rd Bayfront Expy Multimodal Install bike signals across north Bayfront Expy leg and west Willow Rd leg Install high-visibility crosswalks and cross-bike markings Reconstruct eastbound Willow Rd right-turn channelizing island to improve pedestrian access and provide space for shoulder-running bus lane Remove southbound Bayfront Expy channelizing island to provide space for shoulder-running bus lane and restripe with a right-turn lane and add right-turn overlap phase Modify traffic signal to accommodate channelized right turn modifications Install Transit Signal Priority (TSP) for queue jumps by shoulderrunning buses on northbound and southbound Bayfront Expy approaches 14 Marsh Rd from Bay Rd to Scott Dr Marsh Rd Bicycle Network Bay Rd to Florence St: Establish Class II Buffered Bicycle Lanes in both directions (requires removal of parking on the north side of street) Florence St to Scott Dr: Establish Class II Buffered Bicycle Lanes in both directions. Remove or modify existing median to allow the eastbound bike lane to be transitioned to the left of the right-most eastbound through lane at Scott Dr Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

LARGE INFRASTRUCTURE TIER 1 PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 47 Willow Rd & Middlefield Rd Willow Rd Remove westbound Willow Rd channelized right turn, and modify signal to include westbound right-turn overlap Modify traffic signal to included protected northbound and southbound left-turn phasing. Restripe northbound Middlefield Rd approach to include one leftturn lane, one through lane, one bike lane, and one right-turn lane. Restripe southbound Middlefield Rd approach to include one leftturn lane, one through lane, one through-right turn lane, and one bike lane. Extend bike box on northbound Middlefield Rd approach to encompass both the left-turn lane and the through lane. Install bike boxes on the eastbound and westbound Willow Rd approaches. Construct pedestrian facilities on east side of Middlefield Rd between Woodland Ave and Willow Rd 78 Ravenswood Caltrain Crossing Downtown s Safety improvement to separate Ravenswood Ave from Caltrain tracks and Alma St to eliminate at-grade vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle crossings Alternative A, which would bring Ravenswood Ave below the Caltrain tracks, was selected as the preferred alternative, though additional study is being conducted to explore other options Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes from Caltrain Railroad tracks to Noel Drive Coordinate with future potential Peninsula Bikeway planning efforts Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

LARGE INFRASTRUCTURE TIER 1 PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 81 Middle Ave Caltrain Crossing Downtown s Construct pedestrian and bicycle crossing at El Camino Real/Middle Ave intersection Connect to future plaza, to be funded and constructed via private development (Middle Plaza) Install pedestrian crossing improvements across Alma St from Caltrain Crossing to Burgess Park 84 El Camino Real within City Limits El Camino Real Establish Class II Buffered Bicycle Lanes with painted buffer area in each direction by removing on-street parking, where necessary, and incorporating pedestrian crossing improvements Encinal Ave to Valparaiso Ave-Glenwood Ave: Remove parking along east side of El Camino Real. Remove rightmost southbound travel lane on El Camino Real, no parking lane present southbound. Valparaiso Ave-Glenwood Ave to Oak Grove Ave: Remove parking along both sides of El Camino Real. Oak Grove Ave to Santa Cruz Ave: Remove parking along both sides of El Camino Real. Santa Cruz Ave to Ravenswood Ave-Menlo Ave: Remove parking along west side of El Camino Real. Designate Class III Bicycle Route northbound along segment due to right-of-way constraints in lieu of Class II Buffered Bicycle Lane. Ravenswood Ave-Menlo Ave to Roble Ave: Remove median for entire length of segment. Widen sidewalk facility on east side of El Camino Real to 15 feet for a Class I Multi-Use Path in lieu of Class II Buffered Bicycle Lane. Roble Ave to Middle Ave: Remove parking along east side of El Camino Real. Middle Ave to Cambridge Ave: Remove parking along both sides of El Camino Real. Cambridge Ave to Creek Dr: Remove parking along both sides of El Camino Real. Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

LARGE INFRASTRUCTURE TIER 1 PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 84 El Camino Real within City Limits Creek Dr to Sand Hill Rd: Widen existing bridge over San Fransquito Creek or construct a pedestrian and bicycle bridge to install a Class 1 Multi-Use Path west of El Camino Real to connect from Sand Hill Rd to Creek Dr. Coordinate with future potential Peninsula Bikeway planning efforts 178 Marsh Rd between Independenc e Dr to Scott Dr Marsh Road Establish Class II Bike Lanes Support Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan Number SM-101- X14 that calls for the construction of an additional bicycle and pedestrian bridge over US 101 north of Marsh Road. Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

OUTREACH-COMPLEX TIER 1 PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 61 Coleman Ave from Ringwood Ave to Willow Rd Menlo Oaks Bicycle Network Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes from Willow Rd to City Limits (requires removal of parking on one side of the street) Coordinate with San Mateo County between City Limits and Ringwood Ave regarding bicycle facilities 74 Ravenswood Ave & Laurel St Laurel St Recommended s Remove parking south of Ravenswood Ave on west side of Laurel St for a distance of 150 feet and shift northbound Laurel St lanes to add bicycle lane to the left of right-turn lane Widen and modify eastbound Ravenswood Ave to shared thru-left lane and a right turn lane with the bicycle lane transitioning to the left of the right turn lane Upgrade existing crosswalks to high-visibility Funded s Modify southbound Laurel St to left-turn lane and shared thru-right lane Maintain existing Class II Bicycle Lanes Remove parking on west side of Laurel St north of Ravenswood Ave for a distance of at least 100 feet 75 Laurel St from Burgess St to Willow Rd Laurel St Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes (requires removal of parking on both sides of the street) Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

OUTREACH-COMPLEX TIER 1 PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 107 Oak Grove Ave from Crane St to University Dr Downtown s Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes on Oak Grove Ave between Crane St and University Dr (requires parking removal on the north side of the street) 118 Middle Ave from University Dr to Olive St Middle Ave s Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes (requires removal of on-street parking on one side of the street) Install new sidewalk or replace existing asphalt pathway on both sides of Middle Ave, to be completed in phases as properties are redeveloped 129 Olive St from Oak Ave to Santa Cruz Ave West Menlo s Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes between Santa Cruz Ave and Middle Ave (requires parking removal on at least one side of the street) Designate Class III Bicycle Route between Middle Ave and Oak Ave Implement Bicycle Boulevard design features Install High visibility crosswalk across the north leg of the intersection at Stanford Ave and Olive Ave 134 Avy Ave from Santa Cruz Ave to Monte Rosa Dr West Menlo s Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes (parking removal required) Coordinate with County on bicycle facility connectivity 189 University Dr between Oak Gve Av & Santa Crz Av Downtown s Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes on University Dr (requires removal of parking on at least one side of University Dr) Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

DESIGN-COMPLEX TIER 1 PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 39 Willow Rd & Ivy Dr Willow Rd Install right-turn overlap on southbound Ivy Dr and restrict eastbound Willow Rd U-turns Widen pedestrian refuge island to match crosswalk width on east Willow Rd leg Convert existing crosswalks to high-visibility crosswalks Extend pedestrian crossing time 40 Willow Rd & O'Brien Dr Willow Rd Install curb ramps at all corners of intersection Install high-visibility crosswalks on all legs and add pedestrian signals (including new crosswalks crossing Willow Rd) Install bulb-outs into O'Brien Dr on northeast and southeast corners 41 Willow Rd & Newbridge St Willow Rd Convert existing crosswalks to high-visibility crosswalks Modify signal timing to lead-lag operation on Newbridge St with the leading left-turn phase on the southbound Newbridge St approach and lagging left-turn phase on the northbound Newbridge St approach 44 Willow Rd from Bay Rd to O'Keefe St Willow Rd Establish Class II Bicycle Lane on eastbound Willow Rd from O'Keefe St to Bay Rd, connecting to US 101 Willow Rd interchange bicycle facilities Establish Class II Bicycle Lane on westbound Willow Rd from Bay Rd to Durham St Remove or reconstruct existing median to allow for Class II Bicycle Lanes where right-of-way is insufficient Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

DESIGN-COMPLEX TIER 1 PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 59 The Willows The Willows Bicycle Network Designate Class III Bicycle Route Implement Bicycle Boulevard design features on Gilbert Ave, Pope St, Walnut/O'Connor streets, O'Keefe St, and O'Connor St Construct Class I Multi-Use Path from Willow Oaks Park to Pope Street (coordinate with Ravenswood School District) 63 Middlefield Rd & Ravenswood Ave Menlo- Atherton High School Safe Routes to School Remove eastbound Ravenswood Ave channelized right-turn lane, install right-turn overlap phase, modify signal timing Install crosswalk and cross-bike markings on north Middlefield Rd leg, install bike signal Construct jughandle bicycle left-turn on east side of Middlefield Road to allow bicycle left-turns onto Ravenswood Ave Install bicycle leaning rail with push button for bicycles to initiate crossing phase on jughandle left-turn Coordinate with Town of Atherton 64 Middlefield Rd & Ringwood Ave-D St Menlo- Atherton High School Safe Routes to School Remove southbound Middlefield Rd channelized right turn Reconstruct curb ramp and reduce curb radius on northwest corner Replace crosswalks on north and west legs Install Two-Stage Left-Turn Queue Boxes for cyclists traveling from Middlefield Rd to Ringwood Ave Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

DESIGN-COMPLEX TIER 1 PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 65 Middlefield Rd & Linfield Dr- Santa Monica Ave Middlefield Rd Safety s Install Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) or traffic signal with emergency pre-emption on Middlefield Rd at Linfield Dr-Santa Monica Ave Install "Keep Clear" striping at Menlo Fire Protection District Station No. 1 Close sidewalk/pathway gap on eastern side of Middlefield Rd between Linfield Dr and Santa Monica Ave Coordinate with Menlo Fire Protection District 69 Middlefield Rd from Willow Rd to Palo Alto Ave Middlefield Rd Multimodal s Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes (City has a plan line to allow for widening as properties are redeveloped) Coordinate with future potential Peninsula Bikeway planning efforts 70 Middlefield Rd & Woodland Ave Middlefield Rd Multimodal s Install a traffic signal Install crosswalks on all intersection approaches Install bicycle crossing improvements to connect Woodland Ave, Middlefield Rd, and Palo Alto Ave 79 Alma St from Ravenswood Ave to Burgess Dr Downtown s Install sidewalk on the east side of Alma St to connect to Burgess Park path Upgrade crosswalks to high-visibility Ensure project is consistent and provides connectivity to Middle Ave Pedestrian and Bicycle Rail Crossing Construct green infrastructure 113 University Dr & Menlo Ave (South) Downtown s Remove westbound Menlo Ave right turn lane Install bulb-out at northeast corner into Menlo Ave Replace crosswalk with straightened crossing Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

DESIGN-COMPLEX TIER 1 PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 144 Sand Hill Rd & Santa Cruz Ave Sand Hill Rd Install high-visibility crosswalks Install LED sign for southbound Santa Cruz Ave right-turn on red restriction Coordinate with San Mateo County 146 Sand Hill Rd & Sharon Park Dr Sand Hill Rd Upgrade existing crosswalks to high-visibility Install high-visibility crosswalk and pedestrian signal heads on west leg of Sand Hill Rd Would require construction of curb ramps and reconstruction of existing median on west Sand Hill Rd leg Reconstruct nose in front of traffic signal on east Sand Hill Rd leg to provide clear crosswalk Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

ATTACHMENT F ALL TIER 2 PROJECTS PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 16 Constitution Dr & Chrysler Dr Menlo Gateway Mitigation Recommended s Install westbound Chrysler Dr left turn lane (widening of Chrysler Dr west of Constitution Dr may be required pending final design) Install crosswalks across all legs Funded Install traffic signal Modify and add lane on eastbound Chrysler Dr approach to shared left/through lane and shared though/right lane 17 Chrysler Dr & Jefferson Dr Chrysler Dr Intersection s Install traffic signal 18 Chrysler Dr & Independence Dr Chrysler Dr Intersection s Install traffic signal 20 Jefferson Dr from Chrysler Dr to Constitution Dr Jefferson Dr Multimodal Network Install sidewalk on both sides of the roadway, to be completed in phases as the properties on Jefferson Dr are redeveloped Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes (requires removal of on-street parking) 27 Ivy Dr from Willow Rd to Chilco St Ivy Dr Pedestrian Network Widen sidewalks on both sides of Ivy Dr and narrow existing median Coordinate with San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

ALL TIER 2 PROJECTS PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 28 Newbridge St from Market Pl to Carlton Ave 30 Adams Dr from O'Brien Dr to University Ave 31 University Ave & Adams Dr 32 O'Brien Dr from Willow Rd to University Ave Newbridge St Pedestrian Network Adams Dr Pedestrian and Bicycle Network University Ave & Adams Dr Intersection s O'Brien Dr Pedestrian Network Widen sidewalks on both sides of the roadway by narrowing the travel lanes Install sidewalk on both sides of the roadway, to be completed in phases, as the properties are redeveloped Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes Install traffic signal Coordinate with City of East Palo Alto and Caltrans Funded s Install sidewalk on both sides of the roadway, to be completed in phases, as the properties on O'Brien Dr are redeveloped Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes (requires removal of on-street parking) 37 Willow Rd b/w Bayfront Expy & US 101 Willow Rd Alternative C Install eastbound Willow Rd one-way Class IV separated bikeway between Hamilton Ave and US 101 Willow Rd interchange Install westbound Willow Rd one-way Class IV separated bikeway between Dumbarton Rail and US 101 Willow Rd interchange Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

ALL TIER 2 PROJECTS PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 38 Willow Rd & Hamilton Ave Willow Rd Modify southbound Hamilton Ave to shared left-thru lane and time of day right turn lane Implement evening peak period parking restriction on west side of southbound Hamilton Ave for 400 feet to increase right-turn storage Modify northbound and southbound Hamilton Ave to split phase 43 Willow Rd & Bay Rd Willow Rd Modify southbound Bay Rd to two left turn lanes and a right-turn lane Narrow existing median on north Bay Rd leg Install westbound Willow Rd right-turn lane Install high-visibility crosswalk on east Willow Rd leg with curb ramps Install pedestrian signals 45 Willow Rd & Coleman Ave Willow Rd Install right-turn lane on southbound Coleman Ave approach (requires removal of on-street parking for 150 feet along the west side of Coleman Ave) Refresh decorative crosswalk Install bike detection on the southbound Coleman Ave approach Evaluate protected-permitted left-turn phasing on Willow Road 46 Willow Rd & Gilbert Ave Willow Rd Install a painted median and vertical traffic control device (e.g. planters, bollards) around heritage oak on Gilbert Ave 150 feet north of Willow Rd Prohibit parking for a distance of 40 feet to the north and south of the oak tree on the east side of Gilbert Ave Restrict on-street parking on Gilbert Ave South of Willows Rd during school hours Evaluate protected-permitted left-turn phasing on Willow Road Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

ALL TIER 2 PROJECTS PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 51 Bay Rd from Del Norte Ave to Ringwood Ave Flood Park Triangle Install sidewalk along east side of Bay Rd to provide access to Flood County Park 53 Bay Rd & Ringwood Ave-Sonoma Ave Flood Park Triangle Convert the west legs Sonoma Ave and Ringwood Ave to one-way couplets with Ringwood Ave serving eastbound traffic and Sonoma Ave serving westbound traffic Bay Rd/Ringwood Ave becomes a four-legged intersection Add left-turn lanes, as deemed necessary during design phase, on eastbound Ringwood Ave and northbound Bay Rd approaches (requires full use of public right-of-way and this would require the removal of existing landscaping and the relocation of existing utilities) Install traffic signal 56 Bay Rd from Van Buren Rd to Willow Rd Flood Park Triangle Upgrade existing off-street path to Class I Multi-Use Path along west side of Bay Rd and integrate into proposed bicycle improvements on Willow Rd Coordinate with Veterans Administration Medical Center 66 Santa Monica Ave from Middlefield Rd to Nash Ave Santa Monica Ave Pedestrian Network Install sidewalk or asphalt pathway on the north side of Santa Monica Ave Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

ALL TIER 2 PROJECTS PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 71 Laurel St from Encinal Ave to Glenwood Ave 72 Laurel St & Glenwood Ave 77 Alma St from Oak Grove Ave to Ravenswood Ave Laurel St Laurel St Downtown s 80 Burgess Park Downtown s 82 Encinal Ave from Garwood Wy to El Camino Real Downtown s Install sidewalk or asphalt pathway on western side of Laurel St Install traffic signal Coordinate with Town of Atherton Convert angled on-street parking on both sides of street to parallel parking, designate some parking spaces as passenger loading zones from 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. weekdays, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays, unrestricted time limit parking otherwise, with at least three unrestricted ADA spaces Remove duplicate driveway curb cuts Designate Class III Bicycle Route Widen existing path to meet current Class I Multi-Use Path design standards Establish Class II Bicycle Lanes (requires removal of parking on both sides of the street) Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization

ALL TIER 2 PROJECTS PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA NO. LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DETAILS SAFETY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT GHG REDUX / PERSON THRUPUT TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY SCHOOL NEARBY SENSITIVE POPULATION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 97 El Camino Real & Creek Dr El Camino Real Install "bulb-outs" and curb ramps on northwest and southwest corners of intersection Install high-visibility crosswalk on west Creek Dr leg Install ADA compliant curb ramp for southbound bridge crossing 108 Oak Grove Ave & Hoover St Downtown s Remove on-street parking space located on Oak Grove Ave in the middle of the intersection on the south side of Oak Grove Ave Install high-visibility crosswalk on north Hoover St leg 110 Oak Grove Ave & University Dr Downtown s Evaluate the installation of a westbound Oak Grove Ave left turn lane during Bicycle Lane design process Install high-visibility crosswalks on all three legs of intersection 111 Santa Cruz Ave between El Camino Real and University Dr Downtown s Convert all angled parking to parallel on-street parking Install parklets on each block Designate at least 60 feet toward flexible curb use on each block face for passenger loading and commercial loading with complementary time restrictions for each activity Widen sidewalks and update streetscape design standards 112 Santa Cruz Ave & University Dr (North) Downtown s Install traffic signal Install a bike boxes on the north and west legs 120 Blake St from Middle Ave to College Ave Allied Arts Neighborhood Install sidewalk or asphalt pathway on at least one side of Blake St Prioritization Legend: = Fully Met Criteria = Partially Met Criteria Empty = Did Not Meet Criteria for Prioritization