DEVELOPING A POLICY TO PLAN AND OPERATE MANAGED LANES IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: LBJ IN DALLAS COUNTY AND AIRPORT FREEWAY IN TARRANT COUNTY

Similar documents
I-635 LBJ EAST PROJECT

Public Hearing Tarrant County. October 11 th, 2012

A Federal Perspective on Congestion Pricing. Wayne Berman Federal Highway Administration July 8, 2010

Priced Managed Lanes in America. October 2013

Managed Lanes: A Popular and Effective Urban Solution. Ed Regan Presented by Susan Buse

IH 85 EXPRESS LANES ATLANTA, GA USDOT Congestion Reduction Demonstration Program Grant ($110M)

6/14/2013. Welcome. to the US 75 Corridor Study. Public Meeting. US 75 Corridor Study Area

What are Managed Lanes?

It s Been 15 Years Already?!

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Today s Agenda. Welcome & Introductions. I-526 Lowcountry Corridor Update. Table Discussions. Next Steps / Conclusion

Technology and the Changing Face of Tollways

Managed Lanes: A National Perspective Managed Lane Strategies

ROADSOADS CONGESTION HAMPTON SYSTEMYSTEM MANAGEMENT. Part II Roadway Congestion Analysis Mitigation Strategies and Evaluation

405 Express Lanes General Information & Frequently Asked Questions

Measuring the Distribution and Costs of Congestion. Tim Lomax Texas Transportation Institute

Traffic Congestion in Houston. Presented by Bill King

Toll Express Lanes for the Research Triangle region Including discussion of possible applications on I-40

Managed Lanes 2017: What They Are and How They Work. Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation

Overview of 64 Express Lanes. Secretary of Transportation Aubrey Layne April 12, 2017

The Future of All Electronic Tolling Brian Patno Raytheon ITS Texas October 26, 2012

Transportation, Parking & Roads

395 Express Lanes Extension

Performance Measures Target Setting NCTCOG Public Meetings

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

The I-680 Southbound Express Lane

Congestion Reducing Activities. Toby Carr GDOT Director of Planning April 10, 2014

Managed Lanes in California:

DALLAS FORT WORTH. There are several congested sections of road that do not have a logical big fix solution.

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFT NEED AND PURPOSE

WHAT IFS: Over the course of

Proposed Project I 35 from Denton to Cooke County Line

DRAFT. The HOV/HOT Alternative: Working Paper #3

Managed Lanes: A Primer

November 14, Dulles To DC Loop Public-Private Partnership Proposal. Executive Summary

Tolling Study. July 23, 2009

July 10, :00-11:30 a.m.

Managed Lanes. Steve Schilke, P.E. Major Projects Unit Head District 1. Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 2016

Commuter Credits Pilot Project

Freeway Improvement Project

95 Express Annual Operations Report: Fiscal Year

State Road & Tollway Authority Georgia 400 Demolition Project Frequently Asked Questions

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

100 Most Congested Roadways in Texas

High Occupancy Toll Lanes Potential for Implementation in the Atlanta Region

Appendix PIT Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

CENTRAL AND EAST CORRIDORS

MnPASS System Today and the Future

Sketch Level Assessment. of Traffic Issues. for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal. Ronald F. Kirby

92% COMMUTING IN THE METRO. Congested Roadways Mode Share. Roadway Congestion & Mode Share

Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies

IMPACTS TO TRANSIT FROM LOS ANGELES CONGESTION REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION. Word Count: 3,386 (body) + 2,000 (8 tables) + 1,500 (6 figures) = 6,886 words

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

GIVING GEORGIANS A CHOICE TO KEEP MOVING

Where We Live and Work Today

Managed Lanes Fundamentals and Opportunities. September 12, 2013

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

Public Hearing October 21, 2014 University of North Florida Adam W. Herbert University Center Alumni Drive Jacksonville, FL 32224

National Capital Region Congestion Report

Hot lane policies and their implications

Enhancing Return on Investment for MnPASS Express Lanes

MOVEABLE BARRIER. Congestion Management Solutions

Preliminary Review of the T-REX Southeast Corridor Highway and Light Rail Transit Project

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

I-105 ExpressLanes Project

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

There are traffic jams on Highway 1

Managing Limited Access Highways for High Performance: Costs, Benefits, and Revenues

STATION #3 INITIAL ALTERNATIVES

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

Contemporary Approaches in Congestion Pricing:

The I-85 Express Lanes Project NASCIO Recognition Award Nomination

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

2009 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT: Six Congestion Reduction Strategies and Their. Effects on Mobility

Alternatives Public Workshop

DALLAS MIDTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOCUS NORTH TEXAS Peer Chacko, AICP, Assistant Director, City of Dallas

Idea-66: Westbound I-66 Inside the Beltway

Strategies to keep people and goods moving in and through Seattle

I-25 PEL: CO Springs Denver South Connection. Presentation to Castle Rock Town Council

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

York Region Population and Employment Growth

I-80 Corridor Overhaul

CONGESTION AROUND THE WORLD

91 Express Lanes Model Update 2006 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. Gerald V. Nielsten May 18, 2007

An Investigation of Freeway Capacity Before and During Incidents

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

100 Most Congested Roadways in Texas

August 12, The Honorable Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor, State of California State Capitol Sacramento, CA Dear Governor Brown:

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

GENERAL DESCRIPTION. Page 1 of 5

7. Roadway System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

Using moveable barrier in the new urban environment

Welcome. Wilmington Transit Moving Forward Workshop Presentation. October 16, 2013

Managed Lanes: The Fitch Approach. Saavan Gatfield, Senior Director

4 Level of Service Results: HOV and Express Lanes

Transcription:

DEVELOPING A POLICY TO PLAN AND OPERATE MANAGED LANES IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: LBJ IN DALLAS COUNTY AND AIRPORT FREEWAY IN TARRANT COUNTY Regional Transportation Council May 11, 2006 Transportation Department www.nctcog.org

Recent Policy Questions Toll Roads vs. Managed Lanes Toll Roads Managed Lanes Toll Rate? X X Rate Change Over Time? X X Rate Vary by Corridor? X X Time-of-Day Pricing? X X Fixed or Dynamic Pricing? Continuous Performance Monitoring? Vehicle Type/Occupancy Pricing? Excess Revenue? X X X X X

Schedule for Tolling Managed Lanes and Development of Regional Policies RTC April 13, 2006 Public Meetings April 24-26, 2006 Joint STTC/RTC Workshop April 27, 2006 STTC April 28, 2006 RTC May 11, 2006

Some Definitions Freeway Limited access facility open to all traffic without toll Tollroad Limited access facility where travelers pay a toll to use the facility SOV Single Occupant Vehicle (one person in one vehicle) HOV High Occupancy Vehicle (two or more people in one vehicle) Managed Lanes A set of lanes where operational strategies are proactively implemented and managed in response to changing conditions (Federal Highway Administration)

Elements of Managed Lanes Increase Corridor Efficiency Relatively Congestion Free Travel Travel Time Reliability Provide for Operational Flexibility in Response to Changing Corridor Needs Active Demand Management Vehicle Eligibility Pricing Access Control

Managed Lanes vs. Other Facility Types Vehicle Eligibility Toll Pricing Freeway All No Tollway All* Yes HOV Lane Managed Lane Vehicle Occupancy* All* * Heavy trucks are sometimes restricted. No Yes Varies by Vehicle Type/Occupancy Access Control Frequent Access Points Frequent Access Points Less Frequent Access Points Less Frequent Access Points

Traveler Choice in Corridor Frontage Roads Serves Local Trips, No Demand Management Freeway Serves Subregional/Corridor Trips, No Demand Management Managed Lane Serves Regional Trips, Active Demand Management Frontage Rd. Mainlaines Managed Lanes Mainlanes Mixed Flow HOV & SOV Mixed Flow Free Toll Free Frontage Rd. HOV High Occupancy Vehicles SOV Single Occupant Vehicles

Policy Questions What is the primary purpose of the managed lanes? What types of vehicles are eligible to use the managed lanes? Should the rate vary by time of day, vehicle type, or occupancy? Should the rate be fixed (schedule) or dynamic (i.e., change in response to congestion)? What should the rate be? How should the rate be adjusted over time? Should the policy vary by corridor?

What is the Primary Purpose of the Managed Lanes? Provide Additional Capacity in Corridor Provide Trip Reliability for HOV and Transit (improve air quality and increase vehicle occupancy and person movement) Generate Revenue to Construct Facility Generate Revenue to Operate and Maintain Facility

What Types of Vehicles are Eligible to use the Managed Lanes? SOV HOV Vanpools Transit Vehicles Motorcycles Large Trucks* Special Vehicle Type (e.g., Green Vehicles ) * Tunnels will likely have vehicle restrictions.

Should the Rate Vary by Time of Day, Vehicle Type/Occupancy? Time of day Peak Period Off-Peak Nighttime Lanes Closed at Certain Times Vehicle Type/Occupancy Free Full Rate Reduced Rate

Why Time-of-Day Pricing? Increase Carpooling Increase Vanpool/Transit Use Move Discretionary Trips to Off-Peak Move Short Trips to the Frontage Roads Encourage Trip Chaining Increase Flextime Hours Encourage Work Schedule Changes Encourage Telecommuting Reduce Trip Length Over Time Increase Reliability

Should the Rate be Fixed or Dynamic? Fixed Schedule Rate is published and set, price may vary by time of day and vehicle type/occupancy Dynamic Rate is adjusted throughout the day based on certain facility performance measures May vary by time of day, vehicle type/occupancy, and level of congestion May also be capped Fixed with Transition to Dynamic Start with a schedule and shift to dynamic based on a set of performance measures

What Should the Rate Be? Adjacent freeway lanes and variable managed lane demand facilitates market-based rates Market-based rates (congestion pricing) will enable managed lanes to operate at higher speeds and increase travel reliability Managed Lane Target

What Should the Rate Be? (continued) SkyComp 2003 Data: I.H. 635 S.H. 121 to I.H. 20 PM Peak Period

What Should the Rate Be? (continued) SkyComp 2003 Data: S.H. 183 I.H. 820 to I.H. 35E AM Peak Period

What Should the Rate Be? (continued) The toll rate will affect the demand and level-of-service of the managed lanes To ensure travel reliability, average toll rates will generally be higher than stand-alone tollroads Rate Scenario Toll Rate* Managed Lane Demand Level-of-Service Low <$0.25/mile High Severe Congestion Likely During Peak Medium $0.25-$0.75/mile Moderate Some Congestion Possible During Peak High >$0.75/mile Low No Congestion Expected * Peak period discounts for HOV users.

How Should the Rate be Adjusted Over Time? Discretion of Managed Lane Operator Fixed Schedule and Fixed Index (i.e., annually based on CPI) Fixed Schedule and Performance Based (i.e., annually based on facility performance)

Should the Policy Vary by Corridor? Overall Corridor Traffic Demand Hours of Freeway Lane Congestion Proximity of Parallel Routes Number of Freeway/Managed Lanes Concurrent vs. Reversible Managed Lanes Number/Location of Managed Lane Access Points Adjacent Land Uses, Special Generators (malls), or Special Events (arenas/stadiums)

Examples from Other Areas SR 91 Orange County, CA 10 Miles; 2 Lanes in Each Direction Fixed Schedule with Variable Time-of-Day Tolls ($0.11 - $0.85/mile) SOV/HOV2 Pays Full Toll HOV3+ Free (50% toll PM peak) IH 15 San Diego, CA 8 Miles; 2 Reversible Lanes Dynamic Toll Rate Varies by Speed ($0.07 - $0.50/mile) SOV Pays Full Toll; HOV2+ Free

Examples from Other Areas (continued) IH 394 Minneapolis, MN 10 Miles; 1 Lane in Each Direction Dynamic Toll Rate Varies by Speed on Managed Facility (up to $0.80/mile) SOV Pays Full Toll; HOV2+ Free IH 25/US 36 Denver, CO (June 2006) 7 Miles; 2 Reversible Lanes Fixed Schedule with Variable Time of Day Tolls (up to $0.47/mile) SOV Pays Full Toll; HOV2+ Free

Adopted Managed Lane Policy Regional Transportation Council May 11, 2006 Fixed Schedule for First Six Months; Dynamic Pricing After SOV Pays Full Rate Trucks Pay Higher Rate (no trucks in LBJ tunnel) HOV2+ Full Rate in Off-Peak HOV2+ and Publicly-Operated Vanpools 50% Discount for Peak Period, Phase Out After Air Quality Attainment Maintenance Period (RTC will approve changes) Price with Speed Guarantee (maintain 50+ mph) *6 hours per weekday: 6:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.

Adopted Managed Lane Policy Regional Transportation Council May 11, 2006 (continued) During Dynamic Pricing Phase: Traveler Receives Rebate if Average Speed Drops Below 35 mph (will not apply if speed reduction is out of the control of the operator) Motorcycles Qualify as HOV No Discounts for Green Vehicles Transit Vehicles Not Charged Toll Toll Rate up to $0.75 per Mile During Fixed Schedule Phase, Evaluate and Adjust if Warranted (requires RTC approval)

Adopted Managed Lane Policy Regional Transportation Council May 11, 2006 (continued) Market-Based Tolls During Dynamic Phase Rates Updated Monthly During Fixed Schedule Phase No Scheduled Inflation Adjustments Over Time Same Policy in Every Managed Lane Corridor No Change to RTC Excess Revenue Policy RTC Requests that Local Governments and Transportation Authorities Assign Representatives to the CDA Procurement Process Duration of CDA Should Maximize Potential Revenue Tolls Remain on Managed Lanes After CDA Duration