INDICATORS ON STREET & NEIGHBOURHOOD LEVEL. Ryan Martinson Tim Pharoah

Similar documents
Welcome. Pre-conference Workshop WALK21, The Hague, 16 November Measuring Walking (part IV): Data Collection Methods

This objective implies that all population groups should find walking appealing, and that it is made easier for them to walk more on a daily basis.

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Welcome Pre-conference Workshop Walk21, Vienna, 20 October 2015

DRAFT for a State Policy for Healthy Spaces and Places

4.1 Introduction. 4.2 Aspects of walkable communities

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

Living Streets response to the Draft London Plan

Living Streets Policy

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

NAIROBI NMT POLICY REGIONAL CONSULTATION ON AIR QUALITY, CLEAN VEHICLES AND SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY ROADMAP

CHAPTER 3: Vision Statement and Goals

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

COUNCIL POLICY NAME: COUNCIL REFERENCE: 06/119 06/377 09/1C 10llC 12/1C INDEX REFERENCE: POLICY BACKGROUND

All Season Age Friendly Pedestrian Safety and Walkability Checklist *

Canada s Capital Region Delegation to the Velo-City Global 2010 Conference

Active Travel Strategy Dumfries and Galloway

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

WEST YORKSHIRE LTP CYCLE PROSPECTUS

LEA BRIDGE ROAD - A STREET FOR EVERYONE Public consultation document

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Strategy for Walking & Cycling Action Plan

Washington County, Oregon

City of Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION PROPOSED TRAILS DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Kevin Manaugh Department of Geography McGill School of Environment

Evolution of urban transport policies: International comparisons

Ormond & McKinnon Walks Response to Draft Glen Eira Community Plan

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Birmingham Connected. Edmund Salt. Transportation Policy Birmingham City Council

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Part B Design Guidance / Principles _

21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Creating walkable, bikeable and transit-supportive communities in Halton

Launceston's Transport Futures. Greater travel options for the people of Launceston

WALKABILITY SURVEY IN ASIAN CITIES

NOTES FROM JUNIOR COUNCIL ORIENTATION SESSION HELD ON MONDAY, JANUARY 22, 2018, AT 3:30 PM IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL

RESTRICTED ROADS (20 MPH SPEED LIMIT) (SCOTLAND) BILL. 1. Is reducing the speed limit to 20mph the best way of achieving the aims of the Bill?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Civil Society. Dialogue for Progress

The previous chapters in this plan have established the value of this plan (Chapter 1), the

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Christchurch 3 years on: - growing resilience

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Will development of SUMPs improve Mobility Management in Lithuania?'

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

TOWARDS A BIKE-FRIENDLY CANADA A National Cycling Strategy Overview

Community Improvement Plans: Creating walkable and liveable communities that support local business

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Bike share success factors

Douglas Land Use and Transportation Strategy (DLUTS) Summary. August 2013

VILNIUS SUMP. Gintarė Krušinskaitė International project manager place your logo here

Section 2 Strategic Alignment. Contents

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Mumford Terminal Replacement Opportunities Neighbourhood Open House. we are here. PHASE 2 Identifying and Evaluating Candidate Sites

Frequently asked questions about how the Transport Walkability Index was calculated are answered below.

Agency Advisory Group Meeting #3 and Walk Audit Anchorage Non-Motorized Plan

Urban Transport Policy-making changing perspectives and consequences

What s Health Got to Do With It? Health and Land Use Planning

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Major Bike Routes 102 Avenue Workshop April 21, 2015

Pedestrian Crosswalk Audit

City of Ottawa s Complete Streets Approach to Transportation Projects

9/21/2016 VIA . RE: The Knot (DR16-270)

NATIONAL ACTION STRATEGY A VOICE FOR WALKING

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

About the Active Transportation Alliance

Urban Street Design and Development

05 Pilot Projects 68

Delivering the. Strategy 7.0

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Making Brighton & Hove A Walkable City

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Walking and Cycling Action Plan Summary. A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Westminster s Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy

Stakeholder Meeting Handouts. January 2013

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Bicycle Facilities Planning

Wayfinding and Walking in London. Lilli Matson Transport for London May 2013

WALK- AND bike-friendly TURLOCK

DESIGNING STREETS FOR CITIZENS: UNEP SHARE THE ROAD PROGRAMME

General Design Factors

Transcription:

INDICATORS ON STREET & NEIGHBOURHOOD LEVEL Ryan Martinson Tim Pharoah

Why a difference between National/City and Street/Neighbourhood indicators?

there are a variety of treatments

there are a variety of functions

there are a variety of

Streets and Places needs to be context sensitive

North American Scan (2012)

What we want to discuss Approach for incorporating Street & Neighbourhood Level indicators At the community level, rigorous built environment level, project level Standardized vs Suggested vs Best Practices, Guidelines, What are the appropriate indicators? How do we operationalize these indicators?

Input: Institutional Framework Main Criteria Leadership Strategies & Policies Resources Research & Training (Education) Co-operation & Partnerships Key performance indicators (or elements for creating them) Politicians and (senior) officials Extent to which politicians and (senior) officials take a lead and direction in supporting walking and public space improvements Walking strategy & integration of walking in other strategies Policy principles supporting walking (e.g. complete streets ) Implementation procedures Type of implementation programmes / action plans Type and degree of integration within Input level, i.e. between policies and resources Funding (incl. infrastructure investments, promotion, maintenance, research etc.) The level and continuity of funding for modes/projects a) with adverse effects on walking; b) for rectifying poor walking situations and c) to genuinely improve walking conditions / public spaces Public involvement / citizen participation in decision making, consultation Procedures, degree of decision-making powers Co-operation and dialogue with stakeholders outside government/administration NGO s, advocacy groups, economic interests (developers, retailers etc.), friendly forces and potential opponents

Output: Infrastructure & Promotion Main Criteria Land-use & modal integration Infrastructure & public space Key performance indicators (or elements for creating them) Land-use Land-use: functional mix; mixture and density of uses Distances, (macro-) accessibility & connectivity Distances to amenities / provisions / destinations ( walkscore / walkshed ), Modal integration Integration of walking with other modes, especially with public transport, cycling, car-share Accessibility of facilities at interchanges Walking network Length, density and extension of footpath network e.g. according to type/category: sidewalks, greenways/trails, other stand-alone footpaths, pedestrian areas, pedestrian priority areas, shared space Connectivity, permeability, detour factors, micro accessibility Space (unobstructed) Space allocated to pedestrians and sojourners, e.g. sidewalk width Amount of open spaces, spaces to relax, to stop, sit and/or stand Size of designated clear path, unobstructed walkways (opposite: density of obstructions) Seeing distances, visual perspectives (vistas) Pedestrian scale buildings & usages Type of ground floor usage / frontages (shops, cafés, etc.), diversity, uniqueness Dimensions of buildings and facades (human/pedestrian scale), quality; e.g. number or proportion of buildings with human scale front structures on street Proportions of building height to street width Aesthetics of buildings, e.g. allowing a sense of history and context ( landmarks )

Output: Infrastructure & Promotion Main Criteria Infrastructure & public space Key performance indicators (or elements for creating them) Quality of environment, provisions Green and blue on the street, i.e. trees, green areas, (accessible) water, fountains etc. Micro-/climate moderation and protection: sun, heat, rain, wind Seats provided: formal (benches) or informal (ledges), or in outdoor cafés; arrangement of seats (conducive to watching and interacting with other people) Availability of toilets and other services Street lighting, security Street lighting generally, pedestrian level street lighting & its quality: warm light Windows facing the streets, ground floor shops light up (no closed shutters) Number of people & activities in street spaces at night Crossings / road danger (safety) Number, location and quality of crossings: well marked, distances minimal, no detours (neither vertically nor horizontally) Traffic lights timed to needs of pedestrians: calculated crossing speed, waiting times Crossings and traffic lights equipped for mobility and sensory impaired pedestrians Street(s) with speed limit(s) lower than 30km/hr (20mph) or traffic calmed streets (e.g. proportionate to all streets); actual speeds driven (V85) above 30 km/hr Vehicles (illegally) parked obstructing space and overview for pedestrians Wayfinding (orientation and signage) Orientation/navigation intuitively possible, legible street design, clear vistas Wayfinding system in place for major destinations in area, Tools are easy to follow and consistent (maps, signage), landmark orientation

Output: Infrastructure & Promotion (cont) Main Criteria Infrastructure & public space Information, promotion & education/ enforcement Key performance indicators (or elements for creating them) Pollution & disturbance by motor traffic Intrusive motorized traffic: volume and composition of motorized traffic; number of on-street parking spaces in proportion to streets length or surface area Maintenance State of good repair (no holes and other stumbling elements, lights functioning) Cleanliness e.g. negatively measured as waste left on the ground per m2, dog poop Snow removed from walkways and transit stops in winter time (degree, efficiency, time) Co-operation with third parties Programmes together with third parties, NGO s, civil society, private companies etc. (e.g. events, services, communication etc.)

Outcome: Performance and Perceptions Main Criteria Walking activity, mode share pedestrian volumes & activity in public realm Key performance indicators (or elements for creating them) Walking activity / levels of walking Mode share of walking (in relation to other modes) People walking for exercise (leisure walking: hiking etc.) Children walking to school (unaccompanied) Pedestrian volumes & density Number of pedestrians per hour (according to day and night time, diff. seniors and kids and if they and if they walk alone) Density (crowdedness): number of pedestrians per meter street/path width (Fruin) Activity in the public realm; route choice Number of people in public spaces, activities performed (according to age, gender, social status, type and activity, groups day and night time, are seniors and women by their own present; kids playing, recording if they are accompanied) Intensity of use: average number per 100 m2 Time spent in public spaces, type of night activities Route choice & flows Car-related information Number of cars per household (share of car-free households) Short car trips (proportionate to all car trips; short = below 1km / 3 km)

Outcome: Performance and Perceptions Main Criteria Accidents & threats (safety & security) Key performance indicators (or elements for creating them) Road danger (safety) Traffic accidents with pedestrians (involving at least one vehicle): killed and severely injured pedestrians (relative to population and time walked) Percent of users who witnessed directly or indirectly a traffic accident in the area during the last 5 years (Actual) speeds being driven by motor vehicles Single pedestrian accidents Number of falling and stumbling accidents: Killed and severely injured pedestrians (relative to population and time walked) Security Density of crime; threats, attacks, harassments Number of people on street at night (according to gender and age), type of night activities

Outcome: Performance and Perceptions (cont) Main Criteria Atmosphere of space & culture of human interaction Perceptions, satisfaction & wishes Key performance indicators (or elements for creating them) Sociability & human interaction Social aspects: sociability, social interaction, conflicts (people showing affections, spontaneous friendly interactions; eye-contact between strangers; smiles etc. but possibly also conflicts and hostile encounters) Mood of space created by users Culture of human interaction between street users, e.g. respect shown by car drivers towards pedestrians Number and type of local activities (flea-markets, concerts, etc.) Sensory aspects: sounds, smell, tactile impressions etc. Appropriation of space by users Perceptions & satisfaction Personal satisfaction, happiness, comfort measuring the smiles Mental well-being, emotional responses in space

Impacts: Bottom-line Effects (Benefits) Main Criteria Economic effects Ecological effects Social effects Effects on transportation (system) Health effects Key performance indicators (or elements for creating them) Collective economic impacts More retail activity (shoppers) Possibly higher real-estate and rental prices (for shop owners, residents etc.) (=> adverse effects) Collective ecological impacts Reduced noise Reduced severance (better connections for people and animals) Reduced sealed surfaces => more permeability, flooding prevention Collective social impacts Increased social inclusion, more community cohesion, More social equality; democracy: participation for everyone in social life possible More peaceful interactions, less criminal offences Individual transportation impacts Time savings Collective transportation impacts Less need for transportation space Less congestion, higher efficiency Infrastructure cost savings