Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Similar documents
Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies

DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Crystal City Civic Association September 21, 2016

I-66 Corridor Improvements Route 15 to I-495. November 2014

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Fairlington Citizens Association September 12, 2016

Institute for Real Estate Management Chapter (IREM) 77 VDOT Northern Virginia Megaprojects September 13, 2017

Dulles Area Transportation Association. October 11, Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Arlington County Board October 18, 2016

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Public Hearings

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

Transform I-66. Chief Engineer Garrett W. Moore, P.E. July 12, 2018

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE IN THE I-66 INSIDE THE BELTWAY CORRIDOR

Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement. Cooperating and Participating Agencies Meeting March 19, 2012

BRIEFING ON PROPOSED ADDITIONS AND CHANGES Additions and Changes to Projects Proposed for Inclusion in the 2015 CLRP Update

Commuter Connections Regional TDM Marketing Group Meeting

FY 2018 I-66 Commuter Choice Program Presentation to the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission May 3,

VDOT I-66 Inside the Beltway Eastbound Widening Environmental Assessment. Staff Recommendations

EXHIBIT B-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Phase 1 of the Preferred Alternative

NORTHERN VIRGINIA HIGHLIGHTS for the Dulles Area Transportation Association

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Public Information and Participation Comments

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document

Public Information Meeting

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

Managed Lanes. Steve Schilke, P.E. Major Projects Unit Head District 1. Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 2016

Sketch Level Assessment. of Traffic Issues. for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal. Ronald F. Kirby

I-105 ExpressLanes Project

Project Description Form 8EE

495 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION STUDY COMMENT SUMMARY REPORT JUNE 11, 2018 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

NOVEMBER 2017 DESIGN PUBLIC HEARINGS COMMENT SUMMARY (November 13, 14, and 16, 2017)

PUBLIC COMMENT SUMMARY REPORT Public Information Meetings

Managed Lanes: A National Perspective Managed Lane Strategies

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

What are Managed Lanes?

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

395 Express Lanes Extension

MCA Member Meeting: Tysons Update. Fairfax County Department of Transportation November 13, 2017

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

County of Fairfax, Virginia. Department of Transportation

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Overview of 64 Express Lanes. Secretary of Transportation Aubrey Layne April 12, 2017

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft 2015 CLRP

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

Alternatives Development Technical Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Idea-66: Westbound I-66 Inside the Beltway

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

FM #: ETDM #: 11241

Tunnel Reconstruction South 5 th Street Association October 16, 2018

Fitting Light Rail through Well-established Communities

Core of Rosslyn Transportation Study Existing Conditions Report - Appendix. Appendix E: VISSIM Model Calibration Summary

405 Express Lanes General Information & Frequently Asked Questions

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project

What if YOU could help plan Northern Virginia s transportation future?

Tunnel Reconstruction Brooklyn CB 1 August 14, 2018

TRANSFORM I-66 COMES WITH MULTI-MODAL OPTIONS

I-95 Express Lanes Fredericksburg Extension (Fred Ex) Public Hearing. September 25, 2017

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

Public Opinion about Transportation Issues in Northern Virginia

INTERSTATE 395 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2016

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Table of Contents. 2.0 Land Use and Transportation Inputs Land Use Factors Transportation Factors

TYSONS CORNER BICYCLE MASTER PLAN

Interstate 66 TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT. From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax County FEBRUARY 2013

Fairfax County Parkway Widening Fairfax County

The I-680 Southbound Express Lane

Transportation, Parking & Roads

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

ITEM 15 Notice March 29, 2017

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

North Coast Corridor:

The Year Ahead: Virginia Department of Transportation Northern Virginia District

MnPASS System Today and the Future

Route 29 Solutions Projects

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

ITEM 13 - Information March 19, Briefing on Final Report of the TPB Regional Value Pricing Study

Priced Managed Lanes in America. October 2013

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

DEVELOPING A POLICY TO PLAN AND OPERATE MANAGED LANES IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: LBJ IN DALLAS COUNTY AND AIRPORT FREEWAY IN TARRANT COUNTY

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Project Description Form 6V

Giles Run Connector Road

Exit 13/Golden Triangle Study FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

Welcome. Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study

Meeting Schedule 7:00-7:15 Open House 7:15-7:45 Existing Conditions/Short-Term Improvements Study Presentation 7:45-8:00 Q&A Session 8:00-8:10

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan

Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study Phase III

Transcription:

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing November 5, 2015 Renée Hamilton, VDOT, Deputy District Administrator

I-66 Outside the Beltway Improvement Area Project Location Virginia 2

Purpose and Need Address existing and future transportation problems Improve multimodal mobility along the I-66 corridor by providing diverse travel choices in a cost-effective manner Enhance transportation safety and travel reliability 3

Project Recap November 2013 July 2014 Jan/Feb 2015 May/June 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 FHWA approved Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement with a Record of Decision Launched Tier 2 Environmental Assessment and Transform 66 Outside the Beltway Public Information Meetings NEPA Public Hearings for Draft Environmental Assessment Commissioner s Finding of Public Interest Preferred Alternative and Phasing Approach: Briefings to CTB and Elected Officials, RFQ posted Public Information Meetings, Procurement underway 4

Outreach Results Public Meetings, Hearings, and Outreach 1,400+ comments received during Public Hearing comment period 170+ comments received during Public Information Meetings 2,300+ emails and online discussion board comments received 4,300+ contacts in stakeholder database 21,000+ residences and businesses along the corridor notified of meetings and hearings by direct mail 160+ small group meetings 1,200+ attendees (combined) at the formal meetings and hearings Design Changes Reductions in potential residential relocations from 35 to 11 Elimination of major impacts to Stenwood Elementary School Reconfiguration of the I-495 interchange to reduce property impacts Refinements of design for Route 28 interchange and I-66 mainline to reduce impact to parks Inclusion of access points from both Alternative 2A and 2B 5

Developing the Preferred Alternative Universe of Alternatives 2 Draft Environmental Alternatives Preferred Alternative Elements of Alternatives Mainline cross section Express Lanes access points Interchange concepts Park-and-ride locations Transit service scenarios TDM strategies Alternatives Evaluated Technical studies Public and stakeholder input Key Features Reflects public input Combines the best elements from alternatives evaluated Refines concepts with new ideas to reduce impacts Multimodal approach Moves more people Reduces hours of congestion per day Reduces cut-through traffic on local roads 6

Preferred Alternative Elements Two Express Lanes (convert existing HOV lane & add one lane) HOV-3+ and buses travel free Non-HOV tolled Congestion-based tolls (similar to other Express Lanes in region) Converting HOV-2+ to HOV-3+ by 2020, consistent with the region s CLRP Three regular lanes Open to all traffic No tolls Ramp-to-ramp connections between interchanges (auxiliary lanes) Safety, interchange and operational improvements New transit service and other multimodal improvements High-frequency, fast and reliable bus service during extended peak periods Park-and-Ride facilities Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies Bicycle and pedestrian trail and improvements 7

Preferred Alternative Mainline Cross Section Flexible barrier with buffer, median for potential future transit (with auxiliary lanes, if needed) 8

Project Phasing Why Phase 1? Implementable by 2021 Invests wisely New construction accommodates future Metro extension Makes efficient use of existing infrastructure Elements of Phase 1 Provides 2 Express Lanes in each direction to Gainesville (University Boulevard) Provides new transit service and park-and-ride facilities Makes safety and operational improvements at key interchanges Future Phases Included in Preferred Alternative and environmental document Elements can be implemented to meet future demand as funding becomes available 9

Traffic Analysis Findings Preferred Alternative (2040) and Phase 1 (2025) vs. No Build Alternative: Moves more people via more modes in the AM and PM peak periods Reduces the duration and severity of congestion in the AM and PM peak periods Improves speeds on the I-66 corridor and reduces travel times Improves existing safety issues and bottlenecks 10

Current Traffic Patterns Eastbound Upstream Segment Analysis Segment Source: 2015 I-66 Travel Demand Model using MWCOG version 2.3 and Round 8.3 Land Use Forecasts Downstream Segment 11

Morning Peak Hour Person Trips Move More People in the A.M. Peak Hour 12

Afternoon Peak Hour Person Trips Move More People in the P.M. Peak Hour 13

Improve Speeds Along Corridor Morning Peak Period Comparison of Existing, No-Build and Build General Purpose Lanes Eastbound Direction 14

Improve Speeds Along Corridor Evening Peak Period Comparison of Existing, No-Build and Build General Purpose Lanes Westbound Direction 15

Moving More People With Multimodal Solutions New transit service providing more frequent and reliable trips to major regional destinations New and expanded park-and-ride facilities with direct access to the Express Lanes Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies making it easier and more affordable to use alternative travel options 16

Park-and-Ride Facilities Phase 1 (2021): Approximately 4,000 new spaces in four new/expanded facilities Preferred Alternative (by 2040): Approximately 6,500 total spaces in five new/expanded facilities Amenities that support transit, carpool/vanpool, and kiss-and-ride Direct access to the Express Lanes and convenient connections to local roadway and trail networks 17

Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Enhance bicycle network in Fairfax and Prince William Counties: New crossings of I-66 would better accommodate bicycle and pedestrians, connect routes Project provides opportunities to complete segments of regional trail network 18

Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Parallel to I-66 Some segments of bike/ped network parallel to I-66 to be constructed in Fairfax and Prince William Counties Path cross section reduced per Fairfax County s request to reduce impacts 20

Project Procurement Virginia Secretary of Transportation is considering publically and privately financed options Commonwealth proceeding with three procurement options: Toll Concession or DBFOM (Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain) DBOM (Design-Build-Operate-Maintain) D-B/ATC (Design-Build with Alternative Technical Concepts) Qualifications received October 1, 2015 from multiple teams Conceptual financial proposals due from shortlisted teams on December 1, 2015 Preferred Delivery Method to be announced December 2015 20

Key Milestones Public Outreach Ongoing Public Information Meetings October 2015 CTB Decision on Preferred Alternative October 2015 Final Environmental Document December 2015 Delivery Approach Decision December 2015 Consideration of Alternative Technical Concepts (ATCs) Spring 2016 Selection of Developer Fall 2016 Design Public Hearing Early 2017 Construction Start 2017 Open to Traffic 2021 21

66 INSIDE THE BELTWAY PROJECT 22

Project Map 23

Project Context Only Interstate in the Country limited to HOV only traffic during rush hours Stoplight at the end of I-66 eastbound in the District Deck over I-66 in Rosslyn and retaining walls constrain ability to widen I-66 Metrorail Orange Line trains are overcrowded 24

Changes to I-66 Independent of this Project The Transportation Planning Board adopted a plan to modify HOV rules on all regional interstates including I-66 both inside and outside the Beltway Increase occupancy requirements from 2 to 3 by 2020 Federal rules require limiting or discontinuing use of HOV lanes by hybrids when lanes are degraded (<45mph) I-66 is currently degraded and has been for a number of years 25

Project History Proposed project follows a multi-year study undertaken in 2011 and completed in 2013 26

What are the Current Operational Issues on I-66? Heavy traffic volume over 140,000 vehicles per day (total both directions) Significant multi-hour queues Bottlenecks created by limited thru lanes, lane drops and major merge areas Heavy volumes entering and exiting I-66 at the Route 267 interchange affect traffic in both directions for extended periods In the peak direction, vehicles leaving the corridor on both ends are impacted by downstream congestion Westbound PM congestion approaching I-495 impacted by I-66 congestion outside the beltway Eastbound AM congestion approaching the Potomac River impacted by congestion associated with Roosevelt Bridge 27

What are the Current Operational Issues on I-66? Morning Commute Traffic Quality Rating Congested Severely Congested Source: National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board s Traffic Quality on Metropolitan Washington Area Freeway System Spring 2014 Report 28

Who s Using I-66 in the Morning Heading Eastbound? Origin AM Eastbound, East of Route 267 (Reference Point: ) Fairfax 18% 8% Western VA/WV 11% 5% 58% 29

Where is Eastbound Morning Traffic Going? Destination AM Eastbound, East of Route 267 (Reference Point: ) Downtown 11% 7% 5% 6% (Other) 33% 38% 30

What are the Project Features? Tolling Convert I-66 to dynamically-priced toll lanes in the peak direction during weekday rush hours Toll prices will change depending on traffic volumes to manage demand for the lanes and ensure a more reliable trip Multimodal Enhanced bus service throughout the corridor Better access to Metro New bicycle and pedestrian access Roadway improvements on local roads Future widening Evaluation of the need for Eastbound widening I-66 East from Dulles Connector Road to Ballston 31

What are the Project Benefits? Move more people up to 40,000 more people per day by 2040 and enhance connectivity for the I-66 Corridor Enhance transit service Provide revenue stream support to multimodal components on I-66 and complementary corridors adjacent to I-66 Provide more travel choices for single-occupancy vehicles Improve reliability for all travelers Promote a carpool culture and commitment to multimodalism Create opportunities for improved level of service on parallel routes Provide seamless connectivity to the region s 40+ miles of express lanes 32

How the Tolls Will Work? Toll prices will change depending on traffic volumes to manage the demand for the lanes and ensure a faster and more reliable trip When toll collection begins in 2017: Toll period will be 4-hours in length during AM and PM commuting periods in the peak direction (5:30am-9:30am; 3:00pm-7:00pm) High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)-3+ will be FREE VDOT considering allowing HOV-2 ride for FREE for first few years Single-occupant vehicle (SOV) drivers will have option to pay a toll and use the lanes during rush-hours Lanes will remain FREE to all traffic during off-peak periods Hybrids and Dulles Airport travelers not exempt from toll Motorcycles and emergency response vehicles exempt from toll Heavy trucks prohibited from lanes during rush hours By 2021: HOV-3+ will travel for free as adopted in the Regional Transportation Plan 33

How Are Parallel Roadways Impacted By the Project? Traffic Volume Changes (2017 Eastbound AM) LEGEND No significant No change Significant Change Increase Decrease HOV-2+ Rides for free 34

Project Implementation Agreement for 40 years between Commonwealth of Virginia and NVTC Implemented jointly by VDOT and NVTC VDOT will: Manage the design, construction, maintenance, operations of I-66 tolls, and potential future widening Northern Virginia Transportation Commission (NVTC) will: Plan and select multimodal improvements, in accordance with applicable laws and terms of agreement; Issue grants to and coordinate with agencies to ensure efficient delivery of selected projects; and Monitor effectiveness of projects and report to VDOT. 35

Project Selection Project eligibility: Increase person throughput in the I-66 corridor Provide benefit to toll-payers Ready to implement Eligible project applicants: All NVTC Members Prince William County, Manassas and Manassas Park Transit agencies operating in the I-66 Corridor 36

Upcoming Project Milestones Key Milestones Begin Dates Public outreach Ongoing Working Group/Technical Stakeholder Advisory Group meetings Ongoing Toll and revenue study Spring 2015 Group multimodal solutions according to implementation schedule Spring 2015 Toll system design Summer 2015 Framework agreement Fall 2015 Public Information Meetings October 2015 Environmental Review October 2015 Design Public Hearing January 2016 Group 1 multimodal solutions selection/implementation Spring 2016 Tolling construction Start Summer 2016 Begin Tolling Summer 2017 37

Visit Transform66.org 38