On The Road Again CLAREMORE INDUSTRIAL PARK COMMUTING STUDY

Similar documents
2017 DIVISIONS 1ST GRADE

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

OKLAHOMA SECONDARY SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 14590, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Population & Demographics

2017 Nebraska Profile

Life Transitions and Travel Behaviour Study. Job changes and home moves disrupt established commuting patterns

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

WHERE ARE ARIZONA DEMOGRAPHICS TAKING US? HOW GROWING SLOWER, OLDER AND MORE DIVERSE AFFECTS REAL ESTATE

THE I-79 CORRIDOR. I-79 provides motorists with connections to the following major highways: I-80, PA 358, PA 965 and PA 208.

A Comparison of Highway Construction Costs in the Midwest and Nationally

The Outlook for Real Estate and Residential Construction. Patrick M. Barkey, Director Bureau of Business and Economic Research University of Montana

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

INCOG Board of Directors

Texas Housing Markets: Metropolitan vs. Border Communities. September 22, 2014

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

TO: CHEER COACHES FROM: Amy J. Cassell RE: STATE CHAMPIONSHIP CHEER COMPETITION FACILITY INFORMATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 2014

Oakmont: Who are we?

METRO Now. Transit Leader. One of only four urban. gain bus ridership in Purple and Green Lines. Red Line is one

The North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy and Western Richmond Terrace 1 : The Forgotten Corridor

TOPS NE Oklahoma Area Newsletter- February 2016 Chatting with Kathy

The Wisconsin and Minnesota Economies: What can we learn from each other? Noah Williams

Fixed Guideway Transit Outcomes on Rents, Jobs, and People and Housing

There are three major federal data sources that we evaluate in our Bicycle Friendly States ranking:

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update

NADAguides Market Insights. Marine Industry 2016 Q2

North Carolina Competitiveness

Americans in Transit A Profile of Public Transit Passengers

Key Findings & Corridor Highlights

Webinar: The Association Between Light Rail Transit, Streetcars and Bus Rapid Transit on Jobs, People and Rents

THE 2010 MSP REGION TRAVEL BEHAVIOR INVENTORY (TBI) REPORT HOME INTERVIEW SURVEY. A Summary of Resident Travel in the Twin Cities Region

Small Business Dynamics and Job Creation. Small Business Numbers, Pretty Pictures and Not So Pretty Pictures

Larry Kessler, Ph.D. Boyd Center for Business & Economic Research University of Tennessee

An American Profile: The United States and Its People

Regional Profile Ebbw Vale & Blaenau Gwent

Mobility and Congestion

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

Not For Sale. An American Profile: The United States and Its People

Bike Share Social Equity and Inclusion Target Neighborhoods

Resident Outdoor Recreation for Fremont County, WY July 1999

MANITOBA'S ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY: A 2001 TO 2026 POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

WELCOME Region of Waterloo Transportation Master Plan Update Public Consultation Centre

Nebraska Births Report: A look at births, fertility rates, and natural change

New Data for Vermont and our Communities: A Focus on Programs of the U.S. Census Bureau Town Officer Education Seminars uvm.

Bowhunter Observation Survey

Transportation 2040 Update: Travel Trends. Transportation Policy Board June 9, 2016

Casinos Newly Authorized in Five U.S. States: A Comparison of Legislative Objectives, Licensing Procedures and Actual Outcomes

Public Opinion about Transportation Issues in Northern Virginia A Report Prepared for the:

NADAguides Market Insights. Marine Industry 2016 Q3

WOMEN IN THE NWT - SUMMARY

Please send corrections/changes to

Acknowledgements. Ms. Linda Banister Ms. Tracy With Mr. Hassan Shaheen Mr. Scott Johnston

America s Brightest ORANGE

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT

Participation. Workers Compensation Insurance Seminar. May 22, Nick Beleiciks

Ector County I.S.D. Demographic Update

Land Use and Cycling. Søren Underlien Jensen, Project Manager, Danish Road Directorate Niels Juels Gade 13, 1020 Copenhagen K, Denmark

OKLAHOMA BASS TOURNAMENTS

Kentucky s Surface Transportation System

Student Population Projections By Residence. School Year 2016/2017 Report Projections 2017/ /27. Prepared by:

Boulder Economic Summit The Future of the Talent-Driven Economy

Your Texas Economy. Current through: Tuesday, Nov 20, 2018

APPENDIX A COUNTY-LEVEL HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS IN 2000

Impact of VLTs on Lottery Ticket Sales in New York

Modest fall in December Orders Offset by 19% Gain in Annual Total over 2017

Public bikesharing has emerged as one of the latest transportation

MISO Energy and Peak Demand Forecasting for System Planning

Nevada County Population Projections 2015 to 2034

Demographic Change in North Carolina

Manufacturers continue capacity expansion as technology orders grow

Freddy s Frozen Custard & Steakburgers : Sale Leaseback : 5.65%

colorado.edu/business/brd

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Chapter 2 - Displaying and Describing Categorical Data

Chapter 3 - Displaying and Describing Categorical Data

Arnold Hinojosa

2017 Northwest Arkansas Trail Usage Monitoring Report

Bowhunter Observation Survey

Coolest Cities Results Summary

U.S. Residential Hot Tub Market (YE2016) P age 1. U.S. Residential Hot Tub Market Report 2017, P.K. Data, Inc.

Growth: Humans & Surf Clams

Puget Sound Regional Forecast Chris Mefford Community Attributes

Walkable Retail: When Old Becomes New Again Part 1

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

NC s Shifting Population: Growth, Decline, and Rebound

Golfers in Colorado: The Role of Golf in Recreational and Tourism Lifestyles and Expenditures

A Threatened Bay: Challenges to the Future of the Penobscot Bay Region and its Communities

2012 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

Your Texas Economy. Last updated: January 30, 2018

Summary of NWA Trail Usage Report November 2, 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Roaring Fork and Colorado River Valleys Regional Travel Patterns Study. Transportation Analysis Zone Map of the Region

ECONOMIC IMP ACT REPORT 2018

FACTS AND FIGURES: MAKING THE CASE FOR COMPLETE STREETS IN LEE COUNTY

DOT HS November 2009 Geospatial Analysis of Rural Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities

NC Demographic Trends Through 2035

Transcription:

On The Road Again CLAREMORE INDUSTRIAL PARK COMMUTING STUDY

2 On The Road Again Overview of Study Every day, almost 2,000 people go to work at the Claremore Industrial Park. The park is located in Rogers County in Claremore, OK, north of downtown on Oklahoma Highway 66. The park includes companies such as Baker Hughes-Centrilift, AXH Air Coolers, Pelco Structural, and Caseco. Employees come from Claremore and other parts of Rogers County, but many also commute from other places. The purpose of this study is to examine and discuss where employees are coming from and how long their commutes are taking. After that, results will be summarized and applications of this study will briefly be considered. About the data used This study is based mainly on employee address data supplied by top employers at the industrial park in 2013. No personally identifiable information was included. The initial dataset used here to taled 1,615 addresses. Geocoding is the process that puts addresses on a map. Nonphysical addresses such as P.O. boxes and rural routes cannot usually be used for geo coding. The non-usable addresses were removed from this study, reducing the number of addresses to 1,373. The remaining addresses are shown on the overview map below (except for one in Missouri and one in Norman, OK). Overview map of commuters to the Claremore Industrial Park

Claremore Industrial Park Commuting Study 3 Heat map of commuters to the Claremore Industrial Park: 4 square mile areas Overview map Nearly all of the commuters come from Oklahoma, with one each living in Arkansas, Kansas, and Missouri. If one adds in the companies that did not contribute addresses to this study, the total number of employees in the industrial park is estimated to be 1,950. The mean (or geographic) center shows the average location of where commuters to the park live. On the overview map one can see that the mean center shows a slight shift towards Tulsa away from the park. The mean center is a few miles southwest of the industrial park and just southwest of the Claremore city limits. Heat map The heat map above shows the density of commuters to the industrial park by their home locations. Each square on the map is 2 miles wide, so the squares cover 4 square miles each to show broad patterns (compared to the map on the next page). This map shows that most of the commuters come from an area starting around the northeast corner of Rogers County and across Lake Oologah southwest to Tulsa and Broken Arrow. Top source areas for commuters to the industrial park There appears to be three main areas with high concentrations of commuters, listed in order of magnitude: 1. Claremore-Verdigris-Chelsea 2. Tulsa-Broken Arrow-Catoosa 3. Owasso-Collinsville-Oologah Other areas with important concentrations include Pryor, Bartlesville, Inola, and Vinita.

4 On The Road Again Commuting to the Claremore Industrial Park versus to Claremore as a whole Heat map of commuters to the Claremore Industrial Park: 1 square mile areas The next set of maps is a comparison between commuters to the industrial park and commuters to any workplace in the City of Claremore. The first of these two is another industrial park heat map, this time with a smaller cell size (one square mile) to better compare with the Claremore City heat map. Data sources & comparison The Claremore City related map was obtained from the website On the Map (onthemap.ces.census.gov), which contains maps and data about where jobs are located and where workers live who have those jobs. On the Map is put out by the U.S. Census Bureau, and the data referenced was the most recent 2011. The jobs referenced are primary jobs, meaning the jobs that provide the most income in the case where a person has more than one job. Differences between the two maps When comparing these two maps, the overall patterns look similar with a few differences that can be seen if one

Claremore Industrial Park Commuting Study 5 Heat map of commuters to any workplace in Claremore studies them. For example, commuters to any workplace in Claremore are more spread about in the countryside than commuters to the industrial park note the black dots on the Claremore map where there aren t any green squares on the industrial park map. One reason for the differences is that the Claremore Industrial Park employee base is only a part of the total jobs in Claremore. There are 1,373 industrial park workers represented here as opposed to the 10,917 jobs represented on the Claremore map. Also, the industrial park map is based on the number of employees, as opposed to the number of jobs on the Claremore map. Another thing to note is that these two maps are based on two different years the industrial park data came from 2013, and the Claremore data came from 2011. Also, On the Map job stats are based on unemployment insurance records, so work locations are listed as where the records are housed, and some commuters on the Claremore map may be actually going to a workplace in a different city.

6 On The Road Again Commuting by county of residence Claremore Industrial Park Commuters by Home County Claremore Commuters by Home County Washington, 1% Craig, 1% Others, 3% Others, 13% Wagoner, 4% Cherokee, 1% Mayes, 5% Tulsa, 22% Rogers, 64% Muskogee, 1% Osage, 1% Washington, 2% Creek, 3% Oklahoma, 3% Wagoner, 4% Rogers, 49% Mayes, 5% Tulsa, 18% The county pie charts above show percentages for the top counties from which commuters originate to work at the Claremore Industrial Park and anywhere in the City of Claremore, respectively. Commuters to the industrial park Nearly all of the commuters to the industrial park (97%) live in Rogers County and counties that border it such as Tulsa. See the first map on the next page, Share of industrial park commuters by home county. Rogers County has the largest percentage of commuters with 64%. Tulsa County is next with 22%, followed by Mayes and Wagoner with 5% and 4%, respectively. About 5% of the industrial park workers live in the remaining counties. Commuters to any workplace in Claremore By comparison, out of commuters to any employer in the City of Claremore, less than half live in Rogers County at 49%, and only 18% live in Tulsa County. Mayes and Wagoner Counties make up 5% and 4% of this group, respectively, just as at the industrial park. Oklahoma, Creek, and Washington Counties contribute at least 2% of commuters each. The remaining commuters come from counties that contribute 1% or less of the total number. The source for this data on commuting to the City of Claremore is the 2011 On the Map data. It may seem high that 3% of Claremore workers live in Oklahoma County, where Oklahoma City is, most of which is 2 hours or more from Rogers County. One explanation for this is that some employees might come to Claremore to stay for the week while working. Another is that some company headquarters in Claremore could have branches in Oklahoma City, which could cause people that work at an Oklahoma City branch to counted as working in Claremore. As noted before, in On the Map, employees can be counted at the location where unemployment insurance records are housed rather than the actual workplace. Commuters per capita by county The map at the bottom of page 7 shows how many commuters there are to the industrial park per thousand residents in a county. This measure provides an idea of what share of a county s workforce is employed at the Claremore Industrial Park. As seen on the map, the industrial park s home county of Rogers has the most commuters per capita with about 10 per thousand residents. The next class of counties is about ten times smaller, with about 1 per thousand residents. This class includes Craig, Mayes, and Washington Counties. The next class contains counties with between

Claremore Industrial Park Commuting Study 7 about a third and threefourths of one commuter per thousand residents. This class contains four counties: Nowata, Osage, Tulsa, and Wagoner. Among these the most notable is Tulsa County, with just 0.51 commuters per thousand residents. Although Tulsa County contributes 22% of the industrial park workforce, that amount is just a small part of Tulsa County s labor pool due to its large population. Finally, several outlying counties have 0.16 commuters per thousand or less working at the industrial park. Share of industrial park commuters by county Industrial park commuters per thousand residents by county

8 On The Road Again Commute time comparisons: local and national Drive time map of commuters to the Claremore Industrial Park The above drive time map shows Claremore Industrial Park commuters superimposed on areas that represent the shortest drive time from each commuter s residence to the industrial park. Commuters that can get to the industrial park in less than 15 minutes include those in and around Claremore, Verdigris, and Foyil. Those that are 15-29 minutes away include areas in and around Oologah, Collinsville, Owasso,

Claremore Industrial Park Commuting Study 9 50% 40% 30% 20% 46% 32% 29% 28% Commute Time Comparisons 46% 38% 36% 31% 18% 18% 18% 20% 10% 0% 7% 8% 8% 4% 5% 4% 3% 2% 0-14 minutes 15-29 minutes 30-44 minutes 45-59 minutes 60+ minutes Claremore Industrial Park Rogers County Tulsa County United States northeast Tulsa, Inola, Pryor, and Chelsea. Those 30-44 minutes away are mostly in Tulsa, Sand Springs, Broken Arrow, Vinita, Nowata, and Skiatook. The areas in the 45-59 minutes band are mostly rural except for Glenpool and Sapulpa. Just outside of an hour s drive time are Bartlesville, Tahlequah, and Muskogee. The drive time map data was used to calculate the industrial park commute time percentages on the comparisons bar chart above. The commute time comparisons chart shows percentages of various commute times for workers at the Industrial Park and in Rogers County, Tulsa County, and the U.S. as a whole. The data for the chart for the industrial park came from our survey as mentioned above. The data for Rogers County, Tulsa County, and the U.S. came from the American Community Survey 1-year estimates for 2012. Commuting times to the industrial park Referring to the chart, 46% of industrial park workers drive less than 15 minutes, and 77% drive less than 30 minutes. Only 23% have a commute of over 30 minutes, and only 5% drive more than 45 minutes. So a large percentage of industrial park workers have reasonable drive times. This is especially apparent when compared to the U.S. average, as is discussed next. Industrial park vs. the U.S. average To compare with the U.S., workers at the Claremore Industrial Park generally have shorter commutes than the average American. The most striking statistic is that only 28% of Americans as a whole drive less than 15 minutes to work, as opposed to 46% for the industrial park. Moreover, only 64% of Americans commute for less than 30 minutes as compared to 77% with the industrial park. Also, 36% of Americans have a commute time of over 30 minutes, and 16% drive 45 minutes or more. Commuting times to Rogers County The drive times for Rogers County residents were mostly between those of the industrial park and the U.S. average, but tended to be closer to the U.S. average. Only 32% of Rogers County workers drive less than 15 minutes, but 70% drive less than 30 minutes. Also, 30% of commuters have a drive time of over 30 minutes, and 12% of them drive 45 minutes or more. Industrial park vs. Tulsa County Comparing the Claremore Industrial Park with Tulsa County, the percentages are very similar except that the Claremore Industrial Park has more commuters with under 15 minute commutes, while Tulsa County has more 15-29 minute commuters. In fact, in these two categories, the percentages are almost reversed for the industrial park and Tulsa. Only 32% of Tulsa County workers drive less than 15 minutes, but 74% drive less than 30 minutes. Also, 26% have a commute of over 30 minutes, and only 8% drive more than 45 minutes.

10 On The Road Again Commuters to the industrial park by city of residence Industrial park commuters by city of residence: top 20 cities Commuters to the Claremore Industrial Park come from a variety of cities, as can be seen from the map and chart on this page. Claremore stands alone at the top with 680 workers and a share of 49%. Tulsa is next with 157 workers and an 11% share. Of the rest, the most significant are Broken Arrow, Chelsea, Owasso, Collinsville, and Pryor, each having a share of between 2 and 7 percent. Tulsa and Broken Arrow, when taken together, provide 18% of the industrial park workforce. Other areas with significant contingents include places as far away as Bartlesville, Sand Springs, Coweta, Salina, and Vinita. Owasso 5% What Cities Commuters Come From Inola 2% Oologah 2% Pryor 2% Collinsville 4% Chelsea 6% Broken Arrow 7% Others, 12% Tulsa, 11% Claremore 49%

Claremore Industrial Park Commuting Study 11 What s down the road? In summary, the Claremore Industrial Park contributes a large number of quality jobs to people who live in Rogers County and surrounding areas. Most of the industrial park workers live in areas clustered around Claremore, Tulsa, and Owasso. Rogers County contributes 64% of the industrial park s workforce, while Claremore contributes 49%. Although Tulsa County contributes almost a fourth of the park s workforce, that number of workers is only a small part Tulsa County s workforce. Workers at the industrial park tend to enjoy shorter drive times compared to the U.S. average. Workers at establishments anywhere in Rogers County have commutes that are a little shorter on average than workers at Tulsa County establishments. Industrial park employees are concentrated mostly in a few cities. In particular, 72% of the park s workforce comes from the top four cities of Claremore, Tulsa, Broken Arrow, and Chelsea. Where to go from here? Possible applications of this study include local and regional planning, business planning, tourism, and economic development. One application of this study relates to assessing the image of Claremore with respect to community branding. This branding includes two main functions: 1. To encapsulate what is special about the Claremore experience so more people will want to live, work, play, and shop here 2. To develop an esprit de corps among current residents so they are better able to appreciate and articulate what is great about the area Nearly half of Claremore Industrial Park workers make their home in Claremore, and almost two-thirds live in Rogers County. Therefore, one could make the case that there is a level of satisfaction with the community as a place to live for people who work here. However, should that number be higher? Could Claremore be made more attractive as a place to live for the people who commute here from other places, and could it be done without compromising what is great about Claremore? Answering those questions will be left to those who wish to pursue the matter further.

COMMUNITIES need DREAMERS DREAMERS need US The Innovation Center at RSU fosters economic growth and job creation in northeast Oklahoma and beyond! Helping entrepreneurs and expanding businesses turn passion into progress through solution-based programs and one-on-one technical assistance Leading communities to develop sustainable economic growth in rural Oklahoma through our certification program Oklahoma Awarding thousands to multiple winners in our statewide competition created to help Oklahomans achieve their dreams of self-employment or business expansion