Draft. Lecompton. Table of Contents. Background

Similar documents
DRAFT. Lecompton. Table of Contents. Background

DRAFT. Table of Contents. Background

Lawrence. Table of Contents. Background

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan: Chapters 3 and 4 Distribution

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

This page intentionally left blank.

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Improvements Infrastructure Gap Assessment and Improvements Street Striping

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

This page intentionally left blank.

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Living Streets Policy

EXISTING CONDITIONS. Chapter General Overview

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Pedestrian Project List and Prioritization

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Roosevelt Estates Neighborhood Improvements

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan

AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b HCAOG TAC meeting of May 8, 2014

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Safe Routes to School Action Plan Aberdeen, Idaho

COMPLETE STREETS FUNDING PROGRAM

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: May 10, 2017 MPO Executive Board: May 17, 2017

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Table of Contents Introduction. 2 Purpose of the Plan...2 The Benefits of Walking and Bicycling...3 Vision and Goals of the Plan...

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

FINAL PLAN APPENDIX D CITY OF BERKELEY BIKE PLAN D-1

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY SPECIAL AGENDA ITEM NO. _1A_

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Memo. Introduction. Memphis STP Pedestrian Sidewalk Project

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

ADA on Construction. Guidance for Section C Plan Preparers

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

The Role of MPOs in Advancing Safe Routes to School through the Transportation Alternatives Program

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

Engineering - Bicycle and Pedestrian

Active Transportation Access to Transit

City of Madison: 2017 Capital Budget Capital Improvement Plan

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Chapter 4: Funding and Implementation

Introduction. Who is WILMAPCO. Why are walkable communities important

PRESS RELEASE San Joaquin Council of Governments

» Draft Recommendations» Discussion» Next Steps. Plan for Walking and Biking

Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements in Balboa Park Station Area

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

ECONOMY PEOPLE ENVIRONMENT

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

2014 Wisconsin Tribal Transportation Conference. Matt Halada Transportation Planner NE Region

ADA TRANSITION PLAN. For

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Bonners Ferry US 95 South Hill Report

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

Building Great Neighbourhoods LANSDOWNE

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

August NW Glisan St, Suite 401 Portland, OR (503)

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

CITY OF OAK CREEK SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL ACTION PLAN. East Middle School

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Oakland Pedestrian Master Plan Oakland Pedestrian Plan Draft Recommendations Chapter Outline

Exhibit B: Proposed amendments to the Transportation Element of the Oakland Comprehensive Plan

This page intentionally left blank.

Transportation 2040 Update: Eudora Public Input As of June 1, 2017

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Pavement Management Report. City Council Meeting of May 21, 2013

Transcription:

Lecompton Table of Contents Existing Infrastructure 80 Funding 82 Policy and Program Recommendations 83 Infrastructure Implementation Scenarios 84 Conclusion 85 Douglas County Lecompton Background Located at the northern edge of Douglas County, historic Lecompton is home to just over 600 people. With low traffic volumes and intermittent sidewalks, many pedestrians simply walk in the street. Woodson and Elmore streets are home to destinations such as the Lecompton Historical Museum, Aunt Netter s Café, and Constitution Hall. These two streets boast the largest percentage of sidewalk in town, with large portions of brick sidewalk. However, some sidewalks throughout town have fallen into disrepair, and large sidewalk gaps remain. In the community of Lecompton, sidewalks on both sides of every street may not necessarily be the goal. Many streets that do not have sidewalk, curb and gutter contribute to the rural atmosphere of the community, and walking in the street may be a reasonably safe way to get around town most of the time. Instead, priorities may need to be focused on a few targeted projects that meet local needs and encourage residents and visitors to walk through the community. Lecompton 79

Existing Pedestrian Infrastructure Lecompton In 2015, MPO staff walked and/or drove all streets within Lecompton to record sidewalk defects and missing sidewalk. Staff inventoried the sidewalks for the following defects: cost to install or repair ramps on existing sidewalks is $18,400. This estimate does not include ramps to be added to newly constructed sidewalk where no sidewalk currently exists. Further ramp information can be found in Table 5.2. Vertical deflections <1 Manholes Vertical deflections >1 Missing sidewalk Horizontal gaps Gaps Tree roots No ADA ramp exists Cross slope ADA ramp compliant Brick resets ADA ramp non compliant A map of this inventory can be found in Figure 5.1, and photo examples of defects can be found in Appendix A. Findings Maintenance Maintenance includes the repair of existing sidewalk defects as well as replacing missing panels within a continuous sidewalk. The cost to repair existing sidewalk defects throughout Lecompton is estimated at. Estimates do not include ancillary costs such as tree removal or utility relocation. Ramps The inventory identified 3 ADA compliant ramps, 5 which were not ADA compliant, and 15 locations where no ramp exists. The average cost to construct an ADA compliant ramp is $800. The estimated Table 5.2: Lecompton ADA Ramps (2015 Sidewalk Inventory) Missing Sidewalk The cost to install sidewalks on every street in Lecompton likely outweigh the benefits to be gained from such action. The streets that experience the highest volume of pedestrian, bike, and motor vehicle traffic are Woodson, Elmore, and Whitfield. The estimated cost for installing missing sidewalk on at least one side of these streets can be found in Table 5.1. These estimates do not include the costs of ramp construction, maintenance to existing sidewalks, or ancillary costs such as tree removal or utility relocation. Table 5.1 : Lecompton Estimated Sidewalk Cost on Woodson, Elmore, and Whitfield 80 Regional Pedestrian Plan

Figure 5.1: Lecompton Sidewalk Defects (2015 Sidewalk Inventory) Figure 5.2: Lecompton Missing Sidewalk (2015 Sidewalk Inventory) Lecompton 81

Figure 5.3: Lecompton ADA Ramps (2015 Sidewalk Inventory) Funding for Pedestrian Infrastructure in Lecompton Sidewalk Maintenance The City of Lecompton does not currently have a policy in place for sidewalk maintenance. In that case, Kansas State statute would apply which states the responsibility for sidewalk maintenance falls upon the adjacent property owner. Alternative Sidewalk Maintenance Programs Alternatives to the current policy could be to have the City of Lecompton take over maintenance responsibilities or develop a cost sharing model where property owners and the City each pay a certain amount to maintain or build sidewalks. To generate revenue for this policy change, the city could increase sales tax or property taxes. Table 5.3 demonstrates how much funding could be generated from different levels of taxes. While the years required to raise $1 million may seem unrealistically high, this does provide context for seeking matching funds using local fundraising tools. Table 5.3: Lecompton Annual $ Generation by Tax Type 82 Regional Pedestrian Plan

New Sidewalk Construction and Other Infrastructure Improvements Encouragement Focus areas addressed: Health In addition to sidewalk maintenance and repair, a quality pedestrian system also relies on new improvements that enhance the pedestrian network. The City of Lecompton has never had a standalone sidewalk or pedestrian infrastructure project. In 2014, repairs were made to an existing brick sidewalk using revenue from the City s General Fund. Competing priorities for limited funds restrict Lecompton s ability to improve the sidewalk network through standalone pedestrian infrastructure projects. The Infrastructure Implementation Scenarios located at the end of this chapter offer a few potential pedestrian projects that would create targeted enhancements in the community. Policy and Program Recommendations This Pedestrian Plan provides the primary basis for pedestrian planning, pedestrian prioritization, and pedestrian policy. When the Metropolitan Transportation Plan Transportation 2040 (T2040) is updated, this Plan and any subsequent work will be incorporated and will replace all of the existing pedestrian projects and policies in the Pedestrian Chapter of T2040. The following list of policy and program recommendations aims to make changes that will have the biggest positive impact on pedestrians in Lecompton. Lecompton is home to a cozy downtown and historic landmarks such as Constitution Hall and the Lecompton Museum, all wonderful places to visit on foot. Teachers can encourage students who live in Lecompton to walk to school, and encouragement on a broader scale could empower pedestrians of all ages. The City could participate in National Walk to School Day, a global event that involves communities from over 40 countries walking and biking to school on the same day. City provided maps of walking routes may be an option for Lecompton to consider. Lecompton 83

Infrastructure Implementation Scenarios These proposed implementation scenarios do not have specific projects and or detailed cost estimates. Instead, they provide a high level planning framework for prioritizing need based on different focus areas. They are not mutually exclusive and can be implemented incrementally as funding becomes available. City officials should consider using tools found in the Pedestrian Progress Toolbox section on pages 14 17 to achieve one or more of these scenarios. The Historic Loop This route would connect pedestrians to three of Lecompton s top landmarks: The Lecompton Museum, Constitution Hall, and Downtown. Constructing and maintaining this path would create an opportunity for residents and visitors to enjoy Lecompton on foot. The estimated cost to install sidewalk on at least one side of the Historic Loop is $16,680. This estimate assumes 5 foot width and $6 per square foot. It does not include any right of way purchase that would be needed for a midblock connection between Halderman and Elmore streets nor does it include site specific costs such as tree removal, utility relocation, etc. The Grand Loop Through community discussion at Aunt Netter s and an online survey in May 2016, citizens of Lecompton identified a few key locations as priorities. A popular route for pedestrians is a loop bounded by Woodson to the North, 7th Street to the South, Whitfield to the West, and Eisenhower Drive to the East. The Grand Loop would prioritize sidewalks on at least one side of all streets on this route. In addition, a short connection from Eisenhower Dr. to the end of Boone Street would increase safety for walkers by Figure 5.4: Lecompton Historic Loop 84 Regional Pedestrian Plan

Figure 5.5: Lecompton Grand Loop steering them away from the busy highway to a low traffic city street. The existing 275 foot gap is highlighted in Figure 5.5. Another identified concern is the 7th Street hill leading from Eisenhower Drive toward the elementary school. School children and other pedestrians often walk in the street along this stretch while drivers climb the hill toward the elementary school. Sunlight coming over this hill often obscures the vision of drivers, making it difficult to see pedestrians along this stretch of road at certain times of day. Sidewalk on this part of the Grand Loop would greatly increase safety for both pedestrians and drivers. The estimated cost to install sidewalk on at least one side of the Grand Loop is $142,080 assuming 5 foot width and $6 per square foot. Engineering level estimates may be higher, and the estimate does not include a possible right of way purchase for the gap at the southern end of Boone Street. School Crossing Beacon The neighborhood on the West side of Whitfield street is home to elementary aged children who attend Lecompton Elementary. Construction of a crossing beacon would create a safer path for these children to reach school. The estimated cost to install a school crossing beacon is $45,000. Pedestrian Hybrid Crossing Beacon in Lawrence, KS Lecompton 85

Conclusion This Pedestrian Plan is an important document because it enables city staff to make consistent decisions to improve the pedestrian environment. It sets the stage for policy discussion regarding sidewalk requirements, helps protect streets with developed pedestrian infrastructure, and prioritizes streets with underdeveloped pedestrian infrastructure for upgrades. This Plan will be incorporated into the regional long range transportation plan, T2040, during the update in 2017. Lecompton has a unique opportunity to make targeted investments that will have a large impact on community residents. Each of the proposed policy, program, and infrastructure scenarios could increase the safety and enjoyment of walking in Lecompton. Community leaders should work to identify what level of funding and projects is feasible to implement and prioritize resources accordingly. 86 Regional Pedestrian Plan