U.S. Money Fund Exposure and European Banks: Eurozone Hits Fresh Low

Similar documents
A Giant Producer, & An Emerging Giant Consumer/Investor. Hong Liang

5. Golf Industry Trends and Developments in the US 6. The US Macro Economy Factors and Impact over Golf Industry

CHAIRMAN S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 PROFILE AEGON PROFILE REPORT SCOPE 5

Managed Lanes: The Fitch Approach. Saavan Gatfield, Senior Director

Global Economic Indicators: Eurozone Trade

Global Economic Indicators: Eurozone Trade

Xcel Energy (Baa3/BBB-)

A record Quarter and Year for the Group

The Merits of Diversification in Portfolio Management

Global Economic Indicators: Global Leading Indicators

The Merits of Diversification in Portfolio Management

Interim Management Statement and Details of change to licensing arrangements for the Betting Exchange in the UK

KAS-Web Crossborder Instruction Guide

Presentation half-year results 2012

Demography Series: China

Global Economic Briefing: Industrial Production

SPECIAL DIVIDEND OF MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.

ECONOMIC CALENDAR 2010

World real GDP growth in 2010 Annual percent change

WORLD. Geographic Trend Report for GMAT Examinees

Price to Public (1) % $99,765,625

Brookfield Asset Management O AK T R E E ACQUISITION M A R C H 1 3,

Global Economic Indicators China Trade With Selected Countries

22 November 2016 OFFSHORE WIND EUROPE. Offshore wind smashes $100/MWh. Tom Harries

RBC Economics Financial Update Dawn Desjardins

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK September 2015

CEO Presentation -- AGM 15 November 2018 (ASX: RZI) Raiz Invest Limited

251 engaging and releasing club. 625 only releasing club. 236 all sides. 9,757 only player. 12,604 transfers

Selected Interest & Exchange Rates

195 engaging and releasing club. 479 only releasing club. 166 all sides. 8,025 only player 10,282

Washington Public Ports Association

Deutsche Bank. Consensus Report. 14 August 2018

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK September 2015

Deutsche Bank. Consensus Report. 13 March 2018

YOUR GUIDE TO HOW WE RISK RATE OUR FUNDS

FINANCING THE ENERGY TRANSITION

The Bruce Mansfield Station, Units 1, 2 and 3

Posting of workers in the European Union and EFTA countries : Report on A1 portable documents issued in 2010 and 2011

For such purposes, UEFA intends to organise a tendering process ( Tender ).

Architecture - the Market

Global economy maintaining solid growth momentum. Canada leading the pack

Invitation to express interest UEFA Club Competitions Accommodation Agency - Cycle

Global growth forecasts Key countries/regions,

Maryland SREC Market Update. February 13, 2018

The State of the Market for Growth Rounds in European Tech Companies

Although only 15.0% of the transfers involved a fee, global spending on transfer fees 2 during this one month period was USD 1.28 billion.

Market Correlations: Foreign Currencies

Phase 1 Invitation to Express Interest

TEXAS LOTTERY COMMISSION INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

UEFA EURO Media Services & Operations / Tender Process

Engaging. 503 transfers. 1,263 transfers. Big 5. USD 2,550 million. USD 461 million. Releasing. 1,126 transfers. 5,509 transfers. RoW.

VOLLEYBALL ALBERTA - WEB PRIVACY POLICY

Market Correlations: Copper

Market Correlations: US Trade-Weighted Dollar & Other Currencies

Global economy s strong momentum intact despite elevated level of uncertainty. Canada headed for another year of solid growth

Chart Collection for Morning Briefing

Economic Outlook: fear over fundamentals

44 Economic Perspectives

UEFA EURO Technical Services & Overlay / Tender Process. Supplier for Temporary TV Broadcasting Power Phase 1 - Invitation to Express Interest

Session of HOUSE BILL No By Committee on Commerce, Labor and Economic Development 2-12

Global Trade - Challenges and Outlook

OECD employment rate increases to 68.4% in the third quarter of 2018

CHANGEOVER OF THE QUARTERLY FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Executive Summary TO ESA 2010 AND GUIDELINE ECB/2013/24:

SPECIAL DIVIDEND OF MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.

Each tournament s fi nancial commitment is composed of on-site prize money and tournament fee obligations unless otherwise approved by ATP.

ACTUARIAL STUDY OF UNPAID LOSSES AND ALAE AS OF JUNE 30, 2015 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AUGUST 19, 2015

Smart Parking Limited ASX:SPZ Full Year Results Presentation. Paul Gillespie, CEO Richard Ludbrook, CFO August 2016

OVA Privacy Policy. a) Arranges and encourages volleyball matches and competitions within Ontario;

ANNUAL REVIEW OF INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE - FINAL REPORT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016 COMMERCIAL VEHICLES ALBERTA AUTO INSURANCE RATE BOARD 29 SEPTEMBER 2017

$61,877,660 SERIES 1 VARIABLE RATE SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

BoAML Annual Financials CEO Conference

MERCER SUPER INVESTMENT TRUST QUARTERLY REPORT THREE MONTHS TO 30 JUNE 2017

Accell Group. power in branding and distribution. Business profile. René Takens (CEO) Two segments: - Bicycles, Bicycle Parts & Accessories - Fitness

Invitation to express interest

Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd - Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare - Deals and Alliances Profile

Accell Group first-half net profit up 13%

2019 ECONOMIC FORECAST AND FINANCIAL MARKET UPDATE

Impacts of the Global Economy on Asia Pacific Travel. 29 June 2007 John Walker

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PETERBOROUGH BY-LAW NUMBER

The Anatomy of Bull and Bear Markets. Tom Vernon/James Hutton

ALBERTA AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE RATE BOARD

SINGAPORE edevelopment LIMITED (Incorporated in Singapore) (Company Registration No W)

Macroeconomic Imbalances in

Offer to Purchase for Cash by GAMCO Investors, Inc.

Public Procurement Indicators 2015

The Herzliya Indices. National Security Balance The Civilian Quantitative Dimension. Herzliya Conference Prof. Rafi Melnick, IDC Herzliya

Returned & Services League of Australia Limited

CHURCHILL DOWNS INCORPORATED FOUNDATION Official Rules

Invitation to Express Interest (ITEI) Heavy Machinery Services

Annual results Accell Group 2016

1.3.2 the documentation includes a statement that the Foundation is the author of the material;

Composition of Federal Spending

The Euro Area: A Reality Check

EXPERT GLOBAL TRUSTED

Opportunities in a Challenging Global Business Environment: Can the World Avoid a Double-Dip?

J.P. Morgan Ultimate Services Investor Conference November 15, 2016

Global Construction Outlook: Laura Hanlon Product Manager, Global Construction Outlook May 21, 2009

Each tournament s fi nancial commitment is composed of on-site prize money and tournament fee obligations unless otherwise approved by ATP.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION SENATE BILL DRS45071-MQf-19. Short Title: Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting. (Public)

Mississippi Prepaid Affordable College Tuition Plan Pricing Report for the 2018/2019 Academic Year

Transcription:

U.S. Money Fund Exposure and European Banks: Eurozone Hits Fresh Low Macro Credit Research July 26, 2012 Analysts Macro Credit Research Robert Grossman +1 212 908-0535 robert.grossman@fitchratings.com Kevin D Albert +1 212 908-0823 kevin.d albert@fitchratings.com Martin Hansen +1 212 908-9190 martin.hansen@fitchratings.com Fund and Asset Manager Group Viktoria Baklanova +1 212 908-9162 viktoria.baklanova@fitchratings.com Related Research U.S. Money Fund Exposure and European Banks: Disengagement Continues, June 22, 2012 Research Highlights Sample based on 10 largest U.S. prime MMFs with total exposure of $614 billion as of June 30, 2012, representing 44% of $1.39 trillion in total U.S. prime MMF assets. Geographic exposure to banks (% of total MMF assets): Europe: 24.2% (decreasing) Eurozone: 8.2% (decreasing) Japan: 11.8% (increasing) Largest exposures to individual banks (% of total MMF assets): Credit Suisse: 4.0% National Australia Bank: 3.7% Bank of America: 3.4% Total exposure to Treasurys and Agencies (direct holdings and through repos): 32.2%. Eurozone Drop Resumes: U.S. prime money market fund (MMF) exposures to eurozone banks fell by 33% since the prior reporting period and, as of end-june 2012, represent roughly 8% of total MMF assets in Fitch s sample, a record low during Fitch s period of study starting in end-2006. (See Eurozone Decline Resumes chart below.) Since end-may 2011, allocations to eurozone banks have dropped by almost 80% on a dollar basis. (See Change in Exposure [on a Dollar Basis] table.) This deepening disengagement stems both from ongoing MMF risk aversion to this sector as well as heightened caution by both some European banks and their regulators on the use of this potentially volatile form of funding. Aggregate MMF allocations to European banks outside of the eurozone declined moderately, with decreasing exposure to UK banks partially offset by increased allocations to Nordic banks. Outside of Europe, MMF exposures to Japanese banks continued to rise, with relative stability in MMF holdings of Canadian and Australian banks. Eurozone Decline Resumes 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Eurozone Europe (all) (% of Total MMF Assets Under Management) Source: Fitch Ratings, MMF public Web sites, and SEC filings. Change in Exposure (on a Dollar Basis) Australia, Canada, Japan Rest of Europe (% Change in MMF Exposure) Since End-May 2011 Since End-May 2012 Europe -62% -18% Eurozone -78% -33% France -88% -28% Germany -67% -26% Netherlands -64% -41% Nordic -28% 15% Switzerland -1% -2% UK -56% -23% Japan 99% 11% Australia -14% 1% Canada 21% -2% Treasuries (US) 79% 6% Agencies (U.S.) 18% 3% www.fitchratings.com

MMF Risk Aversion Persists: Declining MMF allocations to eurozone banks are at least partly a reflection of ongoing investor concern about the region. Of MMF allocations to European banks, more than onethird is secured in the form of repos. (See the Repos Continue to Rise chart.) It is important to note that the quality of repo collateral can vary, as illustrated in Fitch s report, Repo Emerges from the Shadow, dated February 2012. In another ongoing sign of risk aversion, holdings of short-term U.S. Treasurys and agencies continue to exceed 20% of MMF assets. (See the Treasurys and Agencies (Including Repo) Reflect Ongoing Risk Aversion chart.) Additionally, almost 10% of MMF assets are in the form of repos collateralized by Treasurys and Agencies, meaning in effect that roughly one-third of prime MMF assets represent Treasury and Agency exposure, versus 20% as of end-may 2011. These sizable allocations to Treasurys and Agencies are particularly noteworthy in the current low-yield environment. For context, the median expense ratio for the 10 prime MMFs in Fitch s sample exceeds the median yield on their Treasury and Agency exposures. (See the Risk Aversion: MMF Expenses Exceed Yields on Treasury/Agency Exposure graph.) Repos Continue to Rise (Repos as % of Exposure to European Banks) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Source: Fitch Ratings, MMF public Web sites, and SEC filings Risk Aversion: MMF Expenses exceed Yields on Treasury/Agency Exposure 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 Median Coupon Median Expense Ratio (Net) Treasurys and Agencies (Including Repo) Reflect Ongoing Risk Aversion (% of Total MMF Assets Under Management) Treasurys and Agencies Treasury Agency (U.S.) Repos Collateralized by Treasurys and Agencies (U.S.) a Total (Direct Holding and Repo) b 2H06 0.4 2.3 2.7 3.7 6.4 1H07 0.0 2.3 2.3 3.9 6.2 2H07 1.0 3.9 4.9 6.8 11.7 1H08 6.0 7.9 13.9 4.0 18.0 2H08 4.4 15.4 19.8 2.9 22.7 1H09 5.5 14.6 20.1 3.5 23.6 2H09 5.0 8.0 13.0 5.1 18.1 1H10 6.8 10.5 17.3 6.4 23.7 2H10 5.8 7.8 13.7 5.8 19.5 2/11 6.6 7.9 14.5 7.7 22.2 5/11 6.4 6.0 12.4 8.1 20.5 6/11 6.5 6.5 13.0 9.1 22.2 7/11 8.0 7.6 15.7 6.7 22.3 8/11 7.8 9.3 17.1 6.9 24.0 9/11 7.6 10.0 17.6 6.5 24.2 10/11 10.0 9.4 19.3 7.1 26.5 11/11 9.2 9.4 18.7 8.7 27.4 12/11 8.9 9.9 18.7 7.9 26.6 1/12 8.6 10.4 19.0 10.1 29.0 2/12 10.4 9.8 20.1 10.9 31.0 3/12 12.1 9.7 21.9 8.5 30.4 4/12 12.7 8.3 20.9 9.3 30.2 5/12 12.7 8.1 20.8 10.0 30.8 6/12 14.0 8.7 22.7 9.5 32.2 a For end-may 2012 and end-june 2012, some repos included as Treasury and Agency collateral are categorized as other in monthly statements and inferred from other data points. These will be verified once N-MFP data becomes publicly available for these periods. b Total is the sum of direct MMF holdings of Treasurys and Agencies and repos collateralized by Treasurys and Agencies. Largest MMF Exposures Financial Institutions (% of Total MMF Assets Under Management, As of End-June 2012) Issuer/Counterparty CD CP Repo Other Total Credit Suisse 0.9 0.2 2.9 0.0 4.0 National Australia Bank 2.8 0.6 0.0 0.3 3.7 Bank of America 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.4 3.4 Bank of Nova Scotia 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 3.4 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi 3.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 3.4 Royal Bank of Canada 1.2 0.5 0.8 0.9 3.4 JP Morgan Chase 0.1 1.1 1.5 0.5 3.1 Mizuho 2.3 0.1 0.5 0.0 2.9 Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp 2.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 2.8 Citibank 0.5 1.5 0.4 0.4 2.8 Barclays 0.7 0.5 1.4 0.0 2.5 Toronto Dominion Bank 1.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.0 Westpac 0.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.8 Deutsche Bank 0.8 0.1 0.9 0.0 1.7 Svenska Handelsbanken 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.7 CD Certificate of deposit. CP Commercial paper. Repo Repurchase agreement. Note: European banks are bolded above. ABCP Asset-backed commercial paper Source: Fitch Ratings, MMF public Web sites, SEC filings 2 July 26, 2012

Fitch s sample represents 44% of the Investment Company Institute s estimate of approximately $1.39 trillion in total U.S. prime MMF assets under management. This study focuses on aggregate MMF exposure to banks CDs, CP, asset-backed CP, repos, and other shortterm notes and deposits. Largest Bank Exposures: The 15 largest exposures to individual banks, as a group, comprise approximately 43% of total MMF assets. (See the Largest MMF Exposures Financial Institutions table on page 2.) Deutsche Bank remains the only eurozone institution within the top 15, contrasted with three eurozone institutions in the top 15 at end-may 2012 and seven institutions at end-may 2011. Collectively, Australian, Canadian, and Japanese banks represent a majority of the top 15 names. There is considerable variety in the form of MMF exposure to these top 15 institutions. MMF exposures to banks that serve as primary dealers are often largely in the form of repos (e.g, Bank of America, Credit Suisse), with exposures to some other banks predominated by certificates of deposit (e.g, Bank of Nova Scotia, National Australia Bank, and Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi). Reliance on MMF Funding: The Bank Reliance on MMF Funding table illustrates bank reliance on MMFs, expressed as the ratio of MMF exposure to a given institution (based on Fitch s sample of the 10 largest MMFs) as a percentage of that institution s total deposits, money market, and short-term funding. Of the top 15 MMF exposures to global banks, MMF funding accounts for at least 3% of short-term liabilities for five institutions. Bank Reliance on MMF Funding (%, As of End-June 2012) CD, CP, Repo, Other/Financial Institution s Issuer/Counterparty Short-Term Liabilities a Svenska Handelsbanken 7.5% National Australia Bank 4.6% Credit Suisse 4.0% Bank of Nova Scotia 3.9% Royal Bank of Canada 3.4% Westpac 2.7% Toronto Dominion 2.2% Bank of America 1.6% Citibank 1.4% Barclays 1.4% JP Morgan Chase 1.3% Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi 1.3% Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp 1.2% Deutsche Bank 1.1% Mizuho 1.1% a Total deposits, money market, and short-term funding. Sample consists of top 15 largest MMF exposures to financial institutions. CD Certificate of deposit.cp Commercial paper. Repo Repurchase agreement. Note: European banks are bolded above. Background on Fitch Study This research study is intended to provide market participants with information on MMF exposures to European banks, and does not comment specifically on Fitch-rated MMFs. At present, the report does not have any rating implications. For the most recent observation period (i.e. June 30, 2012), the MMFs in Fitch s sample represent roughly $614 billion, or 44%, of the Investment Company Institute s estimate of approximately $1.39 trillion in total U.S. prime MMF assets under management. The sample set is based on public filings from the 10 largest prime institutional and retail MMFs as of each observation period. To identify the 10 largest funds that make up Fitch s sample, Fitch uses rankings of fund assets under management sourced from Crane Data LLC. Fitch sources all of the underlying fund exposure data directly from MMF public disclosures, not through a third party data source. In some cases, the MMFs sampled differ slightly from period to period. Because this analysis is based on aggregated data for the 10 MMFs sampled, it does not capture potential differences in exposure profiles across individual funds. MMF exposure to banks encompasses the following instrument types: CDs, CP, asset-backed CP, repos, and other notes (e.g. time deposits). Bank exposure data for foreign branches is consolidated within the banking group s home jurisdiction. Exposures to foreign subsidiaries are generally categorized based on the country classification designated by Fitch s financial institutions group. Bank exposure data includes state-controlled financial institutions, where applicable. To maintain data integrity, Fitch periodically reviews raw exposure-level holdings data and, if warranted, may reclassify specific exposures (e.g. by asset type, industry sector, counterparty, or country). Reclassification and/or revisions to the dataset can result in (generally minor) changes to the historical time series of MMF exposures. The period of observation covers nine distinct semiannual periods, month-end for February 2011, and month-end for May 2011 through June 2012. Note that prior to 2011, financial reporting dates often varied across MMFs. Therefore, Fitch has applied a degree of judgment in categorizing individual MMF filings into the appropriate semiannual bucket within its historical time series. 3 July 26, 2012

Appendix MMF Exposure to Bank CDs, CP, Repos, and Other By Country (As a % of Total MMF Assets Under Management) Europe BE FR DE IE IT NL Nordic PT ES CH U.K. (All) AU CA JP U.S. 2H06 1.4 10.0 10.1 0.4 2.4 4.1 2.6 0.0 0.7 4.0 12.8 48.7 1.6 3.0 2.7 24.6 CD 0.5 6.2 3.4 0.3 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.0 0.1 1.7 5.5 20.4 0.1 2.2 2.6 1.3 CP 0.8 1.4 3.4 0.2 0.3 2.6 1.1 0.0 0.3 0.5 3.3 14.1 1.1 0.4 0.0 7.7 Repo 0.0 0.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.2 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 Other 0.1 2.4 2.0 0.0 1.2 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.5 2.8 10.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 9.7 1H07 2.1 10.4 9.8 0.4 1.9 4.3 2.9 0.0 0.9 4.6 13.0 50.5 2.1 3.0 2.3 26.6 CD 1.0 6.1 3.6 0.2 0.5 1.7 0.7 0.0 0.2 2.8 5.1 22.0 0.4 2.2 2.0 1.4 CP 0.7 1.1 2.5 0.1 0.2 2.0 1.2 0.0 0.1 1.1 3.1 12.2 1.2 0.3 0.1 7.4 Repo 0.0 0.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.8 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 Other 0.4 3.0 2.4 0.1 1.2 0.6 1.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 3.1 12.5 0.5 0.6 0.2 9.6 2H07 2.5 8.6 8.4 0.8 1.7 4.8 3.3 0.1 1.9 4.9 13.4 50.5 2.0 3.7 1.8 26.7 CD 1.2 4.8 2.1 0.3 0.4 1.3 1.4 0.0 1.0 2.5 6.2 21.2 0.3 2.5 1.6 2.1 CP 1.2 1.3 1.9 0.4 0.3 2.9 1.3 0.1 0.3 0.6 4.2 14.3 1.0 0.5 0.1 9.2 Repo 0.0 0.4 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 1.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 Other 0.1 2.1 1.7 0.1 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.6 0.1 2.0 9.2 0.7 0.7 0.0 7.3 1H08 2.6 10.2 7.1 1.6 3.2 3.8 3.7 0.0 2.6 3.4 11.0 49.3 4.0 2.9 1.2 18.6 CD 1.1 6.9 2.1 0.8 1.9 1.5 0.9 0.0 2.1 1.4 5.7 24.4 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.3 CP 1.0 1.2 1.1 0.7 0.4 1.6 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.4 2.6 10.8 1.6 0.3 0.1 6.7 Repo 0.0 0.2 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.9 5.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 4.5 Other 0.5 1.9 1.0 0.1 0.9 0.6 1.3 0.0 0.4 0.4 1.6 8.9 1.4 0.7 0.1 6.1 2H08 0.5 12.7 3.5 0.5 2.7 5.1 3.7 0.0 3.3 2.9 10.4 45.4 4.2 6.2 0.9 15.8 CD 0.1 7.7 0.9 0.4 2.3 2.5 1.3 0.0 2.6 1.2 5.5 24.5 1.9 4.2 0.5 1.6 CP 0.2 2.1 0.9 0.1 0.4 2.2 1.6 0.0 0.6 0.6 2.9 11.7 1.1 1.0 0.2 7.8 Repo 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.1 3.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.3 Other 0.2 2.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.9 6.2 1.2 0.9 0.1 4.0 1H09 1.0 16.2 4.9 0.1 3.0 5.3 4.7 0.5 3.2 2.4 10.9 52.3 4.0 5.9 3.5 8.4 CD 0.6 11.4 2.2 0.0 2.4 3.7 2.1 0.5 2.1 1.2 6.2 32.4 1.8 4.8 3.4 1.5 CP 0.0 2.1 1.0 0.0 0.6 1.3 1.7 0.0 0.9 0.5 2.0 10.2 1.3 0.4 0.1 3.8 Repo 0.0 0.8 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.7 4.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.0 Other 0.4 1.9 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.3 1.0 5.6 0.9 0.5 0.0 1.0 2H09 1.8 16.4 6.0 0.4 3.2 6.1 5.3 0.3 2.9 1.5 11.2 55.2 6.2 6.0 4.7 9.2 CD 1.0 11.7 2.7 0.4 2.4 4.8 3.1 0.2 2.0 0.6 6.8 35.8 3.0 5.0 4.5 0.6 CP 0.3 2.7 1.7 0.0 0.8 0.8 1.4 0.1 0.9 0.2 1.3 10.2 2.2 0.6 0.1 2.0 Repo 0.0 0.3 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 2.6 4.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 4.6 Other 0.5 1.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 4.4 1.0 0.4 0.0 2.0 1H10 1.3 12.7 7.8 0.0 1.9 5.7 5.8 0.0 1.8 1.7 9.8 48.5 6.1 6.9 4.0 9.8 CD 0.7 9.1 2.3 0.0 1.0 4.1 2.5 0.0 1.2 0.4 5.8 27.1 2.3 5.4 3.7 0.9 CP 0.3 1.7 2.3 0.0 0.9 1.0 1.9 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.1 10.3 2.3 0.2 0.3 1.9 Repo 0.0 0.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 2.5 5.9 0.0 0.5 0.0 5.0 Other 0.3 1.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 5.2 1.5 0.9 0.0 2.0 2H10 1.2 14.5 7.8 0.0 1.3 6.2 5.0 0.0 0.6 3.1 9.8 49.6 7.2 7.6 5.5 9.4 CD 0.5 10.4 2.4 0.0 0.4 4.4 3.2 0.0 0.3 1.4 4.5 27.5 3.5 5.8 5.3 0.5 CP 0.3 2.2 2.1 0.0 0.9 1.1 1.6 0.0 0.2 0.3 1.9 10.7 2.6 0.4 0.2 1.2 Repo 0.0 0.6 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 2.9 7.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 5.0 Other 0.3 1.4 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 3.7 1.0 1.1 0.0 2.6 2/11 1.0 13.3 8.2 0.0 1.5 6.3 5.9 0.0 0.2 4.2 8.6 49.6 7.0 8.0 4.9 8.0 CD 0.3 8.3 2.8 0.0 0.1 4.4 2.9 0.0 0.1 2.0 3.7 24.7 2.9 6.0 4.6 0.4 CP 0.2 2.9 2.0 0.0 1.2 1.3 1.8 0.0 0.1 0.8 1.7 12.0 3.2 0.5 0.2 1.4 Repo 0.0 0.9 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.2 8.5 0.0 0.2 0.1 4.0 Other 0.4 1.2 0.7 0.0 0.3 0.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 4.4 0.9 1.3 0.0 2.2 5/11 0.6 15.1 6.8 0.0 0.8 7.2 6.2 0.0 0.2 4.1 10.1 51.5 7.7 8.3 4.8 9.2 CD 0.2 9.2 2.4 0.0 0.1 5.2 3.5 0.0 0.1 2.1 5.3 28.3 3.5 6.9 4.6 0.1 CP 0.1 3.8 1.4 0.0 0.6 1.3 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.3 10.7 3.2 0.5 0.0 1.1 Repo 0.0 1.2 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.6 3.5 9.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 6.0 Other 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.0 1.0 0.7 0.0 2.0 6/11 0.7 14.4 5.5 0.0 0.5 7.1 5.7 0.0 0.2 3.7 10.8 48.9 7.8 8.9 5.3 10.6 CD 0.1 9.4 2.0 0.0 0.1 5.4 2.8 0.0 0.2 1.7 5.2 26.8 3.2 7.1 4.7 0.3 CP 0.1 3.4 1.4 0.0 0.5 1.2 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.1 9.8 3.3 0.5 0.1 1.4 Repo 0.0 1.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 4.0 8.5 0.0 0.3 0.2 6.8 Other 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 3.8 1.2 1.0 0.3 2.1 7/11 0.2 14.1 4.7 0.0 0.0 7.2 6.3 0.0 0.0 3.9 10.5 47.2 8.1 9.3 4.9 9.0 CD 0.1 9.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 5.3 3.5 0.0 0.0 1.7 4.6 26.2 3.5 7.2 4.3 0.5 CP 0.1 3.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.5 9.2 3.5 0.5 0.3 1.3 Repo 0.0 0.9 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 3.9 7.9 0.0 0.4 0.3 5.6 Other 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.5 3.8 1.1 1.1 0.0 1.6 8/11 0.7 11.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 5.8 6.7 0.0 0.0 3.9 8.8 42.1 8.8 10.0 6.3 9.1 CD 0.1 5.8 1.3 0.0 0.0 4.1 3.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 3.1 19.9 4.0 8.2 5.3 0.4 CP 0.1 3.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.8 9.9 3.6 0.7 0.5 1.5 Repo 0.0 0.9 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.1 7.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 5.7 Other 0.5 1.6 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 5.4 1.2 0.9 0.3 1.5 CD Certificates of deposit. Repo Repurchase agreement. BE Belgium. FR France. DE Germany. IE Ireland. IT Italy. NL Netherlands. PT Portugal. ES Spain. CH Switzerland. U.K. United Kingdom. AU Australia. CA Canada. JP Japan. U.S. United States. Continued on next page. 4 July 26, 2012

MMF Exposure to Bank CDs, CP, Repos, and Other By Country (Continued) (As a % of Total MMF Assets Under Management) Europe BE FR DE IE IT NL Nordic PT ES CH U.K. (All) AU CA JP U.S. 9/11 0.4 6.7 4.8 0.0 0.0 5.5 7.2 0.0 0.0 4.5 8.7 37.7 9.4 10.7 7.9 9.4 CD 0.2 3.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 3.6 3.6 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.9 18.3 4.6 8.4 7.0 0.7 CP 0.0 2.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.4 8.2 3.8 0.7 0.3 1.4 Repo 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.3 6.7 0.0 0.5 0.2 5.3 Other 0.2 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.1 4.6 1.1 1.1 0.5 1.9 10/11 0.2 5.5 4.1 0.0 0.0 5.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 4.9 8.9 34.9 9.8 11.3 8.0 8.5 CD 0.1 2.4 0.8 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.4 14.5 4.7 9.4 7.2 0.9 CP 0.0 2.1 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.5 9.3 3.9 0.7 0.3 1.6 Repo 0.0 0.7 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 4.0 8.4 0.0 0.3 0.3 4.6 Other 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.7 1.2 0.9 0.2 1.3 11/11 0.1 2.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 5.4 6.7 0.0 0.0 5.3 9.6 33.4 9.6 11.6 8.6 9.5 CD 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 3.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.9 11.7 4.4 8.8 7.7 0.9 CP 0.0 0.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.9 2.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.8 8.0 4.1 0.7 0.3 1.9 Repo 0.0 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.1 8.9 0.0 0.7 0.2 5.5 Other 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 4.9 1.1 1.4 0.4 1.2 12/11 0.0 1.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 5.2 6.9 0.0 0.0 6.6 8.3 31.7 10.1 12.0 9.8 9.8 CD 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.2 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.0 11.0 4.4 9.2 8.7 0.9 CP 0.0 0.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 2.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.4 8.7 4.3 1.0 0.3 2.0 Repo 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.5 7.5 0.0 0.4 0.2 5.1 Other 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.3 4.5 1.4 1.4 0.5 1.8 1/12 0.1 2.6 3.3 0.0 0.0 5.4 5.8 0.0 0.0 6.5 9.4 33.1 10.1 11.1 8.1 10.7 CD 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 3.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 1.4 2.9 11.5 4.6 9.0 7.5 0.7 CP 0.1 0.9 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.9 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.3 9.1 4.4 0.8 0.3 2.0 Repo 0.0 0.9 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 3.3 9.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 6.4 Other 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.9 3.4 1.1 0.9 0.0 1.7 2/12 0.2 3.5 3.8 0.0 0.0 5.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 4.5 8.6 31.3 9.5 11.1 9.4 11.0 CD 0.0 0.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 3.7 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 2.1 9.9 4.4 8.5 7.8 0.7 CP 0.2 1.2 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 2.2 8.0 4.0 0.8 0.4 2.8 Repo 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 3.8 9.8 0.0 0.7 0.8 5.6 Other 0.0 1.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 3.6 1.1 1.1 0.3 1.8 3/12 0.2 3.4 3.3 0.0 0.0 6.2 4.1 0.0 0.0 5.9 7.7 30.8 8.8 11.3 9.2 10.2 CD 0.0 0.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 4.2 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.8 10.1 3.8 8.8 8.1 0.8 CP 0.2 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.7 8.7 3.9 0.9 0.5 2.6 Repo 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 3.4 9.2 0.0 0.6 0.4 5.1 Other 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 2.8 1.1 1.1 0.1 1.7 4/12 0.2 3.3 4.2 0.0 0.0 5.7 4.2 0.0 0.0 6.0 6.4 30.0 8.5 11.5 9.2 11.0 CD 0.0 0.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 3.4 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.8 10.0 4.3 9.1 8.4 1.2 CP 0.2 1.9 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.3 8.6 3.5 0.9 0.5 2.8 Repo 0.0 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 3.0 9.7 0.0 0.4 0.4 5.4 Other 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.6 0.7 1.2 0.0 1.6 5/12 0.0 3.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 5.2 4.6 0.0 0.0 4.9 6.8 28.2 7.6 12.1 10.3 12.0 CD 0.0 0.3 1.2 0.0 0.0 2.9 1.9 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.4 9.2 3.9 9.3 9.0 1.7 CP 0.0 1.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.9 7.3 3.1 0.9 0.7 2.7 Repo 0.0 0.8 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 3.6 9.1 0.0 0.5 0.4 5.8 Other 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 2.6 0.6 1.3 0.2 1.8 6/12 0.0 2.2 2.8 0.0 0.0 3.2 5.5 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.5 24.2 8.1 12.3 11.8 12.8 CD 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.3 2.9 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 7.3 4.2 9.3 10.5 2.3 CP 0.0 0.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.8 6.1 3.2 0.8 0.7 2.7 Repo 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 2.9 8.3 0.0 0.9 0.5 5.8 Other 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 2.5 0.6 1.3 0.2 2.0 CD Certificates of deposit. Repo Repurchase agreement. BE Belgium. FR France. DE Germany. IE Ireland. IT Italy. NL Netherlands. PT Portugal. ES Spain. CH Switzerland. U.K. United Kingdom. AU Australia. CA Canada. JP Japan. U.S. United States. 5 July 26, 2012

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. Copyright 2012 by Fitch, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. One State Street Plaza, NY, NY 10004.Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings, Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third-party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch s ratings should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided as is without any representation or warranty of any kind. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion is based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at anytime for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. 6 July 26, 2012