Oso en Asturias - Program for the conservation of the brown bear in Asturias LIFE98 NAT/E/005305

Similar documents
LUTREOLA - Recovery of Mustela lutreola in Estonia : captive and island populations LIFE00 NAT/EE/007081

SUSTAINABLE HUNTING - Building Capacity for Sustainable Hunting of Migratory Birds in Mediterranean Third Countries LIFE04 TCY/INT/000054

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM

Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos

THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ACT. (No. 47 of 2013)

NATIONAL REPORT FORMAT FOR THE SAIGA ANTELOPE MOU AND ACTION PLAN

14 OTTER SPECIES ACTION PLAN

African Swine fever in wild boar in Belgium

LIFE and Land Stewardship Lessons Learned. 13th of October 2016 Marc Vilahur, president of XCT

Wildlife poaching and trafficking Case of Kenya

Policy Statement. Page 2 of 5

Proposal for cooperation between GRASP and the CMS Gorilla Agreement

Sustainable use of wildlife in the context of the GIZ Regional Programme in Central Asia

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

Section 3: The Future of Biodiversity

Silencing The Uproar

Presentation of the Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe (LCIE)

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY BIRDS OF PREY IN AFRICA AND EURASIA

CITES and ICCWC: Coordinated action to combat wildlife crime

BRIEFING on IBERIAN LYNX (Lynx pardinus) MANAGEMENT PLAN AT DOÑANA NATIONAL PARK

CONTRIBUTION OF GREEK HUNTING ASSOCIATIONS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR THE WILDLIFE PROTECTION

A new vision for the Birds Directive & The Positive Role of Hunting

Managing rhino, even in the absence of poaching

3rd Meeting of the Special Focal Points for Illegal Killing of Birds

AGREEMENT ON PORT STATE MEASURES TO PREVENT, DETER AND ELIMINATE ILLEGAL, UNREPORTED AND UNREGULATED FISHING

Original language: English CoP17 Doc CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

CZECH REPUBLIC NATIONAL REPORT FOR THE GREAT BUSTARD MOU AND ACTION PLAN. Agency or institution responsible for the preparation of this report

Arctic Fox - Preservation of the Arctic Fox, Alopex lagopus, in Sweden and Finland LIFE98 NAT/S/005371

Developing a programme to make Taranaki predator-free

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

Natura 2000 and fisheries: a question of competence or willingness?

Position of WWF Mongolia Program Office on current situation of Argali hunting and conservation in Mongolia

GUIDELINES ON ACCESS AND CONSERVATION ON CRAGS AND CLIFFS

Silvia Bellini (Italy)

Modernizing Maine's Municipal Shellfish Programs. Chad Coffin President of the Maine Clammers Association

Case Study 3. Case Study 3: Cebu Island, Philippines MPA Network 10

A Discussion on Conservation Strategies for Endangered Charismatic Megafauna

Success and failure of a stakeholder based approach mitigating human-wild boar conflicts in rural areas in Bavaria (South East Germany)

Memorandum of Understanding concerning. Conservation, Restoration and Sustainable Use of the Saiga Antelope (Saiga tatarica tatarica)

Conservation of Polar Bear: Implementation of the Agreement. THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE TRAINING COURSE ON THE SURVEILLANCE OF WILDLIFE DISEASES AND THE ROLE OF HUNTERS

THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-GENERAL REMARKS AT GENERAL ASSEMBLY EVENT ON WORLD WILDLIFE DAY AS DELIVERED. New York, 3 March 2017

Endangered Wildlife Trust Position Statement on Legalising the International Trade In Rhino Horn

Mana Pools National Park, Sapi and Chewore Safari Areas World Heritage Site

The European rabbit: Past, Present and Future of the species in the Iberian Peninsula

MODULE 2. Conservation needs of cheetah and wild dogs and related threats to their survival. Notes:

Game Guard Body of Hunting Organizations in Greece: A conservation success story

THE PLANNING AND. Transport and the law Integrated transport planning Strategies Responsibilities of local government and road controlling authorities

Review of Egypt s National Laws, Regulations, and Adequacy of Enforcement

On a Knife's Edge: The Rhinoceros Horn Trade in Yemen

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

NASCO Guidelines for the Management of Salmon Fisheries

Wild boar magament in relation to ASF

REPORT ON THE LYNX MONITORING TRAINING COURSE

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OF THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LAW. Authorized by the Republic of China Wildlife Conservation Law, amended October 29, 1994.

Law on the Conservation of Species and Biotopes

Wildlife Enforcement in China LEGISLATION, ORGANIZATION, ENFORCEMENT MEASURE, SUCCESS, CHALLENGE, PROBLEM& LESSON LEARNT

Risk of spread after introduction of the virus in to wild boar population

Briefing on the IWC s Conservation Committee

Fish, Fisheries. Life+ Information & Communication and European Policy in the Prespa Basin. Layman s report

Funding the base of long term large carnivore conservation in Hungary ID no.: LIFE 00/NAT/H/7162

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

Re: Consultation on the addition of narwhal and two bowhead whale populations to the SARA List

REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON WILDLIFE. November 6, 1997 No. VIII-498. Vilnius CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

OVERARCHING PRINCIPLES AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR MARINE MAMMAL WATCHING IN THE WIDER CARIBBEAN REGION (WCR)

Regional workshop on the implementation of the CITES shark and ray listings, Dakar, August 2014 Page 1

Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status

Sustainable fisheries in the Mediterranean, Seabirds point of view Multiple choice and exercises ----

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

The Rufford Foundation Final Report

Policy Position Statement on Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and hybrids in Ireland and Northern Ireland

ALBERTA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION. Hunting, Trapping, and Fishing

BACKGROUND, HYPOTHESES, PREDICTIONS

WILDLIFE CONSERVATION IN MALAWI

EU Strategy for ASF OIE-CIC-FACE TRAINING COURSE 18 DECEMBER 2017

9-1 What Role Do Humans Play in the Premature Extinction of Species?

FCE READING SPECIES. Which endangered species: has had its products replaced by other products? 0: B. is sometimes killed for entertainment?

Marker, L. (2005). Aspects of ecology, biology and conservation strategies of Namibian farmland cheetahs. Animal Keeper's Forum 7/8.

Biodiversity and Conservation Biology

LANCU46v2 - SQA Unit Code H2PW 04 Control vertebrate pests and predators using traps

Mountain Gorillas. International Gorilla Conservation Program (IGCP) Mr. Stephen Asuma, IGCP Country Representative,Uganda.

Sustainable coastal fishery in the Baltic Sea in Jurkalne, Latvia

Effective community engagement and partnerships - key to combatting illegal killing and wildlife trade in eastern and southern Africa?

First wild Sumatran rhino in Borneo captured for breeding campaign

Salmon Five Point Approach restoring salmon in England

Explanatory Memorandum to the Scallop Fishing (Wales) Order 2010.

Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs) District Councils (DCs) 27,924 km 2 (3.0% of Tanzania) 148 villages inhabited by 480,000 people. 21 registered WMAs

Phillip Island Nature Park an example of sustainable ecotourism

BROWN BEAR MANAGEMENT IN SLOVENIA. Marko JONOZOVIČ, B.Sc. Slovenia Forest Service Head of Wildlife & Hunting Department

Presentation Eunice Robai. The Endangered Species

BYPAD. Bicycle Policy Audit CITY OF GENT March Summary. Tim Asperges Liesbeth Reekmans. Langzaam Verkeer

Civil Society. Dialogue for Progress

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Invasive Species. Grade Levels. Introduction. This activity is intended for grades 9 12.

Deer Management Unit 127

ZIMBABWE S REVIEW OF THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES (CITES) LEOPARD (PANTHERA PARDUS) QUOTA

African swine fever (ASF)

African swine fever in Lithuania 2016

Canada s largest marine trade association working to promote recreational boating. Join Boating Ontario and save up to $

Transcription:

Oso en Asturias - Program for the conservation of the brown bear in Asturias LIFE98 NAT/E/005305 Project description Environmental issues Beneficiaries Administrative data Read more Contact details: Project Manager: Roberto HARTASÁNCHEZ Tel: 34/98/5401.264 Fax: 34/98/542.794 Email: fapas@quercus.es Project description: Background The brown bear is listed as 'endangered of extinction' in Spain and listed as a priority species by the Habitats Directive. A population of 70-80 bears survives in the Cantabrian Mountains, separated in two completely isolated nuclei. The easternmost subpopulation is the most endangered one, due to a shortage of adult females and absence of recruitment. The principal threats to the Cantabrian bears stem from hunting (poaching and accidents during legitimate hunts), loss and degradation of habitats, human disturbance (opening of new tracks in the wild and a growing tourism activity) and a very restricted gene pool. This project run parallel to other conservation efforts focusing the same species and also funded with LIFE in the bear's distribution area, acting in complementary zones to each other and testing different management ways that may favour the survival of the target species. Objectives The main target of this project was to better control the hunting activity in private hunting reserves placed in municipalities that make up the margins of the species' distribution in Asturias, also implementing a series of habitat

management measures for the benefit of the bear in collaboration with the relevant hunting associations. These measures consisted of collaborating with the surveillance of private hunting grounds (aimed at controlling illicit hunting, eliminating illegal traps, and accompanying the hunts when they took place in sites where a potential conflict with the conservation of the species existed) and, when necessary, suspending hunts in areas frequented by bears. The distrurbance to the hunters was to be compensated either through financial payments or in kind, through performing restoration works that could improve the habitat of both the game species and the bear. Awareness raising seminars for hunters were also to be organised to complement the fieldworks. Parallel to this, collaboration with SEPRONA (the Guardia Civil's nature protection unit) was to be reinforced to combat poaching. A training seminar for SEPRONA's rangers was planned to aid reinforcing collaboration. Publication of a manual on bear protection and a regular information bulletin to disseminate project activities, were also foreseen. Results The final goal of the project was to increase the brown bear population in the project area, and the figures recorded there at the end of the project -permanent presence of 14 to 19 brown bears, and 28-35 individuals using the site as their feeding and dispersal range- showed a trend towards an effective population increase of about 10% when compared to the data presented at the beginning of the project (13-17 permanent and 26-32 passing through). The distribution range of the species also increased in recent years in the area considered, as new signs of bears' presence were detected in three areas: Southern Ibias, Santo Adriano and Amieva. These results should be considered satisfactory, but they and the overall project must be interpreted in the wider and longer term framework of conservation efforts that have been implemented in the last 15 years in the Cantabrian mountain range through several projects carried out by different institutions, mostly with the financial support of the LIFE instrument. Altogether, the situation of the species in its Cantabrian distribution range has improved notably and this population, listed as priority in the Annex II of the Habitats Directive, is close to turning into a successful story in the framework of the Natura 2000 implementation. The main project activities were surveillance and field monitoring actions, which were carried out by a team of 7 wardens who were employed and duly equipped to fight against the main threats for the species in this region: poaching, accidental shootings in the legal hunts and the illegal use of snares to combat vermin. Though these threats remained after the project finished, no brown bears were found dead in the target area in the whole project s duration period thanks to the work undertaken by the beneficiary and the collaborative framework established with the official environmental police (SEPRONA). This absence of incidents could be one of the reasons for the increase in the species population trends. As an important pump-priming effect, it should be noted that the cooperation with the SEPRONA was kept and reinforced after the project s

end. One important activity carried out was seeking for snares (tipically placed by the peasants to fight the wild boar, a species that has experienced a population explosion in recent years causing damages to their crops). Overall, 106 snares were removed from the wild by the FAPAS field patrols. The number of snares detected can be judged as moderate, considering that 12 snares had been removed in just one month in the same area in 1998. This short number of snares was understood as the beginning of the decrease in the use of this illegal unspecific method of controlling pests, and probably a consequence of the pressure of the project wardens and the SEPRONA. The project anticipated the attendance of the FAPAS staff to 20% of the legal hunts celebrated in the target hunting grounds. This action was satisfactorily covered with the presence of the wardens in 261 hunts. According to the beneficiary this presence, beyond the very positive effect of reducing hunting accidents, caused also a change of attitude of part of the hunters towards the bear, and the conservation requisites for this species are not considered a problem for the hunting activity anymore. Unfortunately, this good relation with the hunters was not duly authenticated on the field through long-lasting arrangements with them. One of the key actions of the project was setting up formal agreements with the most important hunting associations (Belmonte, Quirós, etc) for their involvement in the conservation of the brown bear. These agreements were not signed with all the expected associations, but at least those existing with the associations "Astur" and "Grado" were renewed, and a new association, "Teverga", was included in this scheme. Indeed, the insufficient co-operation of some associations did not allow for the full achievement of some of the results expected, such as the cancellation of 1-2 hunts per game reserve when or where the conditions for hosting bears made their presence likely. Some cereal sowings and the bush clearances planned as compensatory measures for the hunting associations in exchange for their surrender were consequently not completed either. Once again providing information, raising the awareness of the hunters and developing patience for medium term strategies raised as essential elements to achieve a good understanding among parties too often confronted. The original idea of signing agreements with the hunting associations to involve them directly in the conservation on the species, was an innovative and potentially demonstrative action valuable for other NGOs and administrations all through Europe, where unwise hunting is a common factor of confrontation with conservationists. Habitat management actions sought both improving the habitat for the species and raising the awareness of local peasants on the likely benefits for them of the conservation works done in the framework of the Natura 2000 network. So, some 3500 cherry trees were planted in private estates of several municipalities, within important areas for the brown bear. Besides, electric fences were given out to the Grado's muicipality hunting association for they installed them, and 700 tree protectors were distributed in Amieva, as an alternative measures to control pests instead of the placing of snares, and 14 beehives were protected to avoid damages caused by bears. These measures were completed successfully. The awareness generated in the neighbouring area of Ponga by the tree

plantations carried out within the project had a clear incentive effect, with LEADER funds being requested to finance the plantation of 3.000 additional cherry trees in this area. The EC support implied a reinforcement of the reputation of the NGO FAPAS among the institutions, hunting and farmers associations, and allowed them to continue with the difficult tasks they try to carry out for bear conservation in this area. Another remarkable pump priming effect was the establishment of a new and optimum collaborative framework between the different NGOs involved in the brown bear conservation in the Cordillera Cantábrica. The relations between FAPAS, the FOP (Brown Bear Foundation) and the FOA (Official foundation of the Asturias government) achieved a very satisfactory understanding that allowed them coordinating the efforts in favour of the brown bear and avoiding any clash or negative interaction between their activities. The beneficiary tried to use the brown bear as a flag of the conservation and distinction of the project area. This idea, if further developed, could provoke significant positive socio-economic effects in the future, enhancing the visibility of the local products and improving the tourism possibilities. Regarding the direct socio-economic effects of the project, it caused the direct employment of 13 persons (2 part time and 6 temporarily hired). Environmental issues addressed: Themes Species - Mammals Keywords endangered species population dynamics protected area controlled hunting zone mountainous area Target EU Legislation Nature protection and Biodiversity Directive 92/43 - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora- Habitats Directiv... Target species Ursus arctos

Natura 2000 sites SPA ES0000055 Fuentes del Narcea y del Ibias SCI ES1200008 Redes SCI ES1200009 Ponga-Amieva SCI ES1200011 Peña Ubiña SCI ES1200012 Caldoveiro SCI ES1200041 Peña Manteca-Genestaza Beneficiaries: Coordinator Type of organisation Description FAPAS, Fondo Asturiano para la Protección de los Animales Salvajes NGO-Foundation FAPAS is a Spanish pioneering NGO that has been working in the region of Asturias (Spain) since the 70's. Since its creation it contributed notably to raise the awareness of managers, stakeholders and, chiefly, of the general public, towards the natural heritage of the Cantabrian Mountain Range, and has particularly focused its work on the conservation of the Spanish population of brown bear (Ursus arctos). Administrative data: Project reference LIFE98 NAT/E/005305 Duration 01-JUL-1998 to 30-JUN -2001 Total budget 754,977.98 EU contribution 528,484.59 Project location Asturias(España) Read more: Project web site Web site with information about the LIFE project and the usual activities of FAPAS.

Project description Environmental issues Beneficiaries Administrative data Read more