Figure R: Timing of bilge pump cycles influenced the outflow temperature in the smaller boats.

Similar documents
2014 Life Jacket Wear Rate Observation Study featuring National Wear Rate Data from 1999 to 2014

APPENDIX F GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOGS

Twin Cities Life-Jacket Wear-Rate Observational Study, 2007

System Flexibility Indicators

[EPUB] USED BASS BOATS FOR SALE BY OWNER

Lake Michigan Wind Assessment Project Data Summary and Analysis: October 2012

NEVADA SLOT MACHINES: HISTORICAL HOLD PERCENTAGE VARIATIONS ANNUAL AND MONTHLY HOLD PERCENTAGES, CENTER FOR GAMING RESEARCH, NOVEMBER 2017

Statistical Analysis of PGA Tour Skill Rankings USGA Research and Test Center June 1, 2007

A corresponding recovery is defined as recovery information that relates to its respective theft. 2

Boston Whaler 270 Outrage Miss Kris

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

Site Description: LOCATION DETAILS Report Prepared By: Tower Site Report Date

Tide Gate Modifications for Fish Passage and Water Quality Enhancement

LANE USE FACTOR ESTIMATION FOR INTERSECTIONS WITH LANE DROP. Park & Kevin

MBMG Butte Mine Flooding Monthly Report BMFOU Consent Decree BU-SEH Remedial Action Monitoring Program Contract No TO-35 September 2013

Site Description: Tower Site

BUBBLER CONTROL SYSTEM

How Effective is Change of Pace Bowling in Cricket?

PART 5 - OPTIONS CONTENTS 5.1 SYSTEM EXPANSION 5-3

ISDS 4141 Sample Data Mining Work. Tool Used: SAS Enterprise Guide

IDENTIFYING SUBJECTIVE VALUE IN WOMEN S COLLEGE GOLF RECRUITING REGARDLESS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC CLASS. Victoria Allred

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

Analysis of Highland Lakes Inflows Using Process Behavior Charts Dr. William McNeese, Ph.D. Revised: Sept. 4,

WIND DATA REPORT. Bourne Water District

How to Select High Pressure and Gas Bypass

COLLECTOR WIND FARM SHADOW FLICKER ASSESSMENT

Chapter 2. Before You Get Underway. Copyright Coast Guard Auxiliary Association, Inc.

Introduction. Methodology

SECTION #1. What is Watercraft Inspection?

Properties. terc.ucdavis.edu 8

USER S GUIDE DepthTrax 1H HawkEye Portable Depth Finder (DT1H)

BY HYDROHOIST BOATLIFTS

USBC conducted extensive research and surveyed all of bowling s stakeholders.

Management of Hybrid Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum sibericum x spicatum) using Diver Assisted Suction Harvesting

Winter Drawdown Issues of Concern

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SEVENTH REGULAR SESSION August 2011 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE

Boats on Display - Subject to Change

Competitive Performance of Elite Olympic-Distance Triathletes: Reliability and Smallest Worthwhile Enhancement

E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences

Results of a Suspended Solids Survey at the Whites Point Quarry, Little River, Digby County, Nova Scotia

Running head: DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 1

Minimal influence of wind and tidal height on underwater noise in Haro Strait

Project Incorporation of Sea Level Rise City of Newport Beach Approach for Balboa Islands, City of Newport Beach, California

Boats on Display - Subject to Change

Draft. Hiroki Yokoi, Yasuko Semba, Keisuke Satoh, Tom Nishida

Boats on Display - Subject to Change

Quantifying the Lasting Harm to the U.S. Economy from the Financial Crisis

Cooling NI Single-Board RIO Systems Appendix: Reference Examples NI sbrio-9605/6

Figure 1 Location of the ANDRILL SMS 2006 mooring site labeled ADCP1 above.

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

Figure 39. Yearly Trend in Death Rates for Drowning: NSW, Year

Chapter 5: Methods and Philosophy of Statistical Process Control

The Jib Sheet. FALL DINNER MEETING Saturday, October 30. Ahoy Salts,

Max. depth. Transom height. Bottom width. Approx. draft. 2.0 m (80 ) 2.0 m (80 ) 0.8 m (33 ) 0.8 m (31 ) 1.2 m (46 ) 1.0 m (41 )

2017 Life Jacket Wear Rate Observation Study featuring National Wear Rate Data from 1999 to 2017

BUBBLER CONTROL SYSTEM

Lagoon 440 RED STILETTO

REACTOR 40 MECHANICAL Configuration Guide

High-Rise Fireground Field Experiments Results

7.4 Temperature, Salinity and Currents in Jamaica Bay

Arizona Climate Summary September 2012

Mitos Fluika Pressure and Vacuum Pumps Datasheet

EVINRUDE 10 YEAR WARRANTY!!! Vinyl floor, livewell, bilge pump, nav lights, Shorelandr trailer

El Niño as a drought-buster in Texas: How reliable is it, or what can we expect this winter? Are the September rains a sign of things to come?

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Citizen Science Based Survey GBR Far North Dive Trip 2016 April 18-26

WALLAS LEAD-THROUGHS 1066, 2460, 2466, 2467, 3467, 3468

FIRST Research Report Light Management in Greenhouses III. The Effect of Hanging Baskets on the Greenhouse Light Environment James E.

STAT 155 Introductory Statistics. Lecture 2-2: Displaying Distributions with Graphs

See if you can determine what the following magnified photos are. Number your paper to 5.

Wind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m

Stats 2002: Probabilities for Wins and Losses of Online Gambling

The Sea Fish Industry Authority Seafish Technology

OPERATION. Thank You. General Operation. Lowering the Lift. Raising the Lift. Safety Tips

STAT 115 : INTRO TO EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. Science answers questions with experiments

FIU Digital Commons. Florida International University. Henry O. Briceño Florida International University,

NADAguides Market Insights. Marine Industry 2016 Q2

Tuesday, January 11, :11 AM (CST)

Statesville, NC. Results of AM ASHRAE 110 Laboratory Fume Hood Performance Evaluations Venturi Hood

Hydrological Condition Report including the issues of High Flow Fluctuation in Chiang Saen

MRI-2: Integrated Simulation and Safety

Air Ball! LabQuest Vernier Gas Pressure Sensor Vernier Motion Detector basketball stopper with needle, stopper stem and tubing attached meter stick

Appendix ELP El Paso, Texas 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Average Runs per inning,

NBA TEAM SYNERGY RESEARCH REPORT 1

Fryderyk Chopin. Team: Bartosz Kawecki Naglis Kazakevičius Pauline Plötz Helena Sałasinska Dariia Zakharchenko Michelle Zuischko

Proportion (%) of Total UK Adult Population (16+)s. Participating in any Watersports Activity

Determining the Oxygen Transmission Rate of Carton Packages


Results and Discussion for Steady Measurements

REDEFINE EXPECTATIONS

hainesmarine.co.uk Haines 26

The power of partnership 10

Legendre et al Appendices and Supplements, p. 1

2014 House Fly Densities around Dairies in Central Texas

Alternative Test Procedures for Evaluating Leak Detection Methods: For Bulk Fieldconstructed

Fundamentals of Machine Learning for Predictive Data Analytics

2. The reference depth is an important measurement for basic flotation testing?

Transcription:

Appendix Table A: All boats tested with hull type and locations. August testing periods were in the upper 70 to 80 F range. September testing had lower air temperatures. Table B: There was a wide range of compartment surface temperatures before testing began. Temperatures were very high on sunny days with warm temperatures, sometimes reaching 120 F. Shaded parts of the compartments had lower temperatures and accounted for the large range of temperatures possible in a single compartment (Crestliner 1650 FishHawk 77 to 120 F). Table C: Livewell, anchor, and center compartment temperatures were measured and the times were quantified for the length of time that temperatures were above 110 F. These compartments were generally small in size and reached the target temperatures, especially the livewells. Only the Crownline 242 did not register any time above 110, but this compartment had a large anchor and rope present. However, the sensors did register temperatures of 109 with an input temperature of 112.9 (Figure D). A slightly higher input temperature (+1-2 ) may have resulted in hitting the target temperature. During testing of the Four Winns 248 Vista, water drained too quickly to submerge three of the sensors (NW on Figure C). Table D: Maximum temperature reached in livewell, anchor, and center compartments were mostly above 110 F. Inflow temperature ranged between 111.5 and 113.7 F. Average input temperature on the Tracker Targa V165 was lowest in the LW2 test at only 111.6. Table E: There was a large number of bilge and other types of open compartments tested. These ranged greatly in size and configuration, which played a role in the heating capacity. Most boats reached the 110 F target for some amount of time, but only a subset maintained the temperature for 5 minutes. Compartment temperature (Table F) may have been maintained for longer time periods if the tests had been extended to a longer time period. Table F: Temperatures were lower in some of the bilge compartments because of the presence of water in the compartment or because of the size of the compartment. Most sensors recored temperatures greater than 100 F. Figures A to C: Compartment location, number, and size varied by boat type, size, and use. Sensor locations are shown and were placed in the corners of the compartments. Boats are listed in the order they were tested. Figure D: These figures show the same information as Table D. Average inflow temperature was near the maximum recorded temperature for the sensors. The Four Winns 248 Vista did not have water touching three of the four sensors because of the draining of the compartment. Figure E: These figures show the same information as Table F. Smaller boats (A) had inflow temperatures rise to nearer to sensor temperatures than in larger boats (B). Figure F and G: Livewells, even when not reaching the temperature for 5 minutes, all showed trends of increasing temperature to 110 F. The sensors had a shared pattern of dropping as the hot water cooled when touching the compartment, then increasing as the hot water warmed the compartment. Inflow temperature showed some variation during the tests and the average temperature of the inflow was related to the ability to warm the compartments to the target temperature. 1

Figure: H and I: Anchor compartments had a large range of measured temperatures. Some compartments, like the Four Winns 248 Vista, had drains in the compartment, so water did not fill the compartment and three sensors were not submerged. Center compartments in the Boston Whalers were large but reached 110 F in the 22 ft boat. Figure J and K: Bilge sensor temperatures for boats less than 17 ft showed a trend of increase to near or above 110 F. The fluctuations in the inflow temperature from the Glastron was due to changes in water pressure, which caused fluctuations in temperature. The average inflow was in the target range. Figure L and M: Bilge sensor temperature in large boats did not reach the target temperature as often as the smaller boats. The sensors did show temperature increases in the compartments, but more time or higher temperature would help reach the target. Temperatures plateaued at a few degrees below the input temperature, so an increase of 1-2 F could increase the sensor temperature by a similar margin. The Carver had water in the bilge compartment, but was still able to raise the temperature of the compartment to near the target temperature. Some sensors, such as the Monarch Little Giant sensors B and C, were dewatered when the bilge pump ran. Figure N: We tested the difference in bilge compartment temperatures between hull type for boats on trailers (left) and in water (right). There were not significant differences between the bilge sensor temperature measurements when compared by hull type for each location separately (ANOVA). Figure O: We tested the difference in bilge temperature based on location of the boat. There was a significantly lower bilge temperature for boats that were in the water, compared to boats on trailers (ANOVA p=0.0048). Boats in water were also larger than boats on trailers, which would have also have larger compartments. Figure P and Q: Inflow and outflow temperatures were similar in livewells, anchor, and center compartments. When there was a lag in the increase of the outflow temperature, there was no outflow until the compartment had filled to a specific level in the compartment. Figure R: Timing of bilge pump cycles influenced the outflow temperature in the smaller boats. Figure S and T: Large boats had fluctuations in the outflow temperature due to the turning on and off of the bilge pump. The increasing temperature of the outflow is shown in the graphs when the pump is running. 2

Table A: Boat testing summary with date, hull type, boat name, location, inside/outside (covered location), start and end time of testing, weather condition, and air temperature. Date Hull Boat Location Inside/Outside Start End Conditions Temperature (F) 16-Aug FG Carver Water Under roof 15:59 16:19 Mostly Cloudy 82.4 16-Aug AL Crestliner 1650 FishHawk Trailer Outside 11:43 12:30 Mostly Cloudy 77.0 16-Aug FG Crownline 242 Water Outside 17:20 17:56 Mostly Cloudy 82.4 16-Aug FG Four Winns 248 Vista Water Outside 16:30 17:16 Mostly Cloudy 84.2 16-Aug AL Lowe Roughneck Trailer Outside 13:16 13:46 Mostly Cloudy 78.8 16-Aug FG Rinker V170 Trailer Outside 10:26 10:59 Mostly Cloudy 78.8 16-Aug AL Row Boat A Trailer Outside 10:05 10:17 Partly Cloudy 75.2 16-Aug AL Row Boat B Trailer Outside 14:09 14:26 Mostly Cloudy 82.4 3 17-Aug AL Alumacraft Tourn. 185 sport Trailer Outside 11:50 12:45 Scattered Clouds 78.1 17-Aug AL Auminum boat Trailer Outside 13:02 13:30 Partly Cloudy 80.1 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler 25 ft Trailer Outside 14:47 15:39 Clear 82.9 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler 22 ft Water Outside 9:55 10:42 Scattered Clouds 70.0 18-Aug AL Monarch Little Giant Water Outside 12:17 12:44 Mostly Cloudy 82.4 18-Aug AL Row Boat C Trailer Inside 10:52 11:10 Scattered Clouds 80.6 18-Aug AL Tracker Targa V165 Trailer Inside 9:48 10:48 Clear 78.8 1-Sep WD ChrisCraft Cavalier Water Inside 14:02 14:48 Mostly Cloudy 70.0 1-Sep FG Nautaline houseboat Water Inside 12:14 13:29 Partly Cloudy 69.1 1-Sep WD Owens Water Inside 10:59 12:01 Mostly Cloudy 68.0 9-Sep AL Lund "Mr. Pike" Trailer Outside 10:13 10:48 Clear 71.0 18-Sep FG Aquarius sailboat Trailer Outside 9:21 9:33 Scattered Clouds 57.2 18-Sep FG Glastron SX 175 Water Under roof 10:42 10:59 Clear 68.2

Table B: Compartment surface material temperature. Compartment code: BLG = bilge, BCK = back of open hulled boat, LW = livewell, AN = anchor compartment, and CC = central compartment. Date Hull Boat Location BLG BCK LW1 LW2 CC AN 16-Aug AL Row Boat Trailer 70-107 16-Aug FG Rinker V170 Trailer 75-105 16-Aug AL Crestliner 1650 FishHawk Trailer 86 83 77-120 16-Aug AL Lowe Roughneck Trailer 85-100 95-100 16-Aug AL Row Boat Trailer 79-87 16-Aug FG Carver Water 76 16-Aug FG Four Winns 248 Vista Water 89 82 16-Aug FG Crownline 242 Water 74 84-92 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Water 59 58 69 17-Aug AL Alumacraft Tournament 185 sport Trailer 76 66 58 17-Aug AL Auminum boat Trailer 79 92 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Trailer 72 94 93-110 18-Aug AL Tracker Targa V165 Trailer 69 74 73 18-Aug AL Row Boat Trailer 77 18-Aug AL Monarch Little Giant Water 86 1-Sep WD Owens Water 66 1-Sep FG Nautaline houseboat Water 67 66 1-Sep WD ChrisCraft Cavalier Water 69 9-Sep AL Lund "Mr. Pike" Trailer 69-70 69-70 18-Sep FG Aquarius sailboat Trailer 49 18-Sep FG Glastron SX 175 Water 64 4

Table C: Anchor compartments, center compartments, and livewell, time (min) over 110 F. Test date, hull types (AL = aluminum, FG = fiberglass, and WD = Wood), boat name, location (Trailer = boat out of water and Water = boat in water) and test type (LW = livewell, AN = anchor compartment, CC = central compartment). NW is no water reaching the sensor. Date Hull Boat Location Test Fore_Port Fore_Star Aft_Port Aft_Star Mid_Port Mid_Star 16-Aug AL Lowe Roughneck Trailer AN 9.0 6.8 5.5 7.5 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Trailer AN 10.5 7.8 7.5 10.5 16-Aug FG Four Winns 248 Vista Water AN NW NW NW 6.5 16-Aug FG Crownline 242 Water AN 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Water AN 3.3 5.8 0.5 2.3 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Trailer CC 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Water CC 5.0 7.0 6.0 5.5 16-Aug AL Crestliner 1650 FishHawk Trailer LW1 8.0 10.8 8.0 6.8 16-Aug AL Crestliner 1650 FishHawk Trailer LW2 8.0 14.8 8.0 8.7 17-Aug AL Alumacraft Tourn. 185 sport Trailer LW1 6.0 4.0 6.5 17-Aug AL Alumacraft Tourn. 185 sport Trailer LW2 7.3 8.5 5.8 8.2 18-Aug AL Tracker Targa V165 Trailer LW1 3.0 4.5 4.2 4.2 18-Aug AL Tracker Targa V165 Trailer LW2 0.0 2.5 0.0 1.2 17-Aug AL Auminum boat Trailer LW1 11.8 6.7 11.8 7.0 9-Sep AL Lund "Mr. Pike" Trailer LW1 8.7 8.2 9.0 8.0 5

Table D: Anchor compartments, center compartments, and livewell test results, maximum temperature reached during each trial for each sensor. Test date, hull types (AL = aluminum, FG = fiberglass, and WD = Wood), boat name, location (Trailer = boat out of water and Water = boat in water) and test type (LW = livewell, AN = anchor compartment, CC = central compartment). Average temperature (Ave in) of the inflow during the test. NW is no water reaching the sensor. Date Hull Boat Location Test Fore_Port Fore_Star Aft_Port Aft_Star Mid_Port Mid_Star Ave In 16-Aug AL Lowe Roughneck Trailer AN 113.8 112.6 110.9 112.2 113.4 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Trailer AN 116.6 114.3 115.9 115.6 112.9 16-Aug FG Four Winns 248 Vista Water AN NW NW NW 112.5 113.2 16-Aug FG Crownline 242 Water AN 109.2 109.2 109.2 109.0 112.9 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Water AN 112.0 112.0 110.9 112.0 113.2 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Trailer CC 110.3 108.3 109.8 105.4 111.5 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Water CC 112.9 112.2 111.8 111.6 114.3 16-Aug AL Crestliner 1650 FishHawk Trailer LW1 113.8 114.9 114.3 114.7 113.7 16-Aug AL Crestliner 1650 FishHawk Trailer LW2 114.0 116.8 114.0 113.8 113.7 17-Aug AL Alumacraft Tourn. 185 sport Trailer LW1 111.6 111.4 113.1 112.3 17-Aug AL Alumacraft Tourn. 185 sport Trailer LW2 116.3 114.0 113.1 114.0 112.9 18-Aug AL Tracker Targa V165 Trailer LW1 110.5 110.7 110.7 110.9 113.1 18-Aug AL Tracker Targa V165 Trailer LW2 109.6 110.5 109.4 110.3 111.6 17-Aug AL Auminum boat Trailer LW1 114.7 112.7 113.6 112.9 112.5 9-Sep AL Lund "Mr. Pike" Trailer LW1 112.5 112.7 112.7 112.5 113.0 6

Table E: Bilge test results, time (min) over 110 F. Test date, hull types (AL = aluminum, FG = fiberglass, and WD = Wood), boat name, location (Trailer = boat out of water and Water = boat in water) and test type (BLG = bilge, BLGcom = compartment like bilge, BCK = back of open hulled boat, BLGdrain = water in from drain hole, SPL = splash compartment). Date Hull Boat Location Test Fore_Port Fore_Star Aft_Port Aft_Star Mid_Port Mid_Star Open compartments 16-Aug AL Row Boat A Trailer BLGcomp 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 16-Aug AL Row Boat B Trailer BCK 0.7 8.0 10.0 6.5 18-Aug AL Row Boat C Trailer BCK 7.7 0.0 4.7 3.5 18-Sep FG Aquarius sailboat Trailer SPL 0.0 0.0 3.8 6.5 0.0 0.0 Boats less than 17 ft 16-Aug AL Crestliner 1650 FishHawk Trailer BLG 0.0 0.0 7.0 6.0 17-Aug AL Alumacraft Tourn. 185 sport Trailer BLG 6.0 5.5 17-Aug AL Auminum boat Trailer BLG 1.0 5.7 1.0 5.8 18-Aug AL Tracker Targa V165 Trailer BLG 4.2 4.7 9-Sep AL Lund "Mr. Pike" Trailer BLG 10.3 11.7 10.8 11.2 16-Aug FG Rinker V170 Trailer BLG 7.0 7.2 6.7 6.5 16-Aug FG Rinker V170 Trailer BLGdrain 5.2 4.0 5.0 5.0 18-Sep FG Glastron SX 175 Water BLG 8.5 7.3 1.2 1.0 Boats greater than 17 ft 16-Aug AL Lowe Roughneck Trailer BLG 13.8 8.0 7.0 7.5 18-Aug AL Monarch Little Giant Water BLG 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Trailer BLG 6.5 5.7 6.5 5.2 16-Aug FG Carver Water BLG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16-Aug FG Four Winns 248 Vista Water BLG 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 16-Aug FG Crownline 242 Water BLG 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Water BLG 4.5 4.7 0.0 8.3 1-Sep FG Nautaline houseboat Water BLG1 4.0 5.0 1-Sep FG Nautaline houseboat Water BLG2 6.3 4.8 8.3 1-Sep WD Owens Water BLG 0.0 22.8 16.7 24.3 1-Sep WD ChrisCraft Cavalier Water BLG1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1-Sep WD ChrisCraft Cavalier Water BLG2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7

Table F: Bilge test results, maximum temperature reached during each trial for each sensor. Test date, hull types (AL = aluminum, FG = fiberglass, and WD = Wood), boat name, location (Trailer = boat out of water and Water = boat in water) and test type (BLG = bilge, BLGcom = compartment like bilge, BCK = back of open hulled boat, BLGdrain = water in from drain hole, SPL = splash compartment). Average temperature (Ave in) of the inflow during the test. Date Hull Boat Location Test Fore_Port Fore_Star Aft_Port Aft_Star Mid_Port Mid_Star Ave in Open compartments 16-Aug AL Row Boat A Trailer BLGcomp 110.5 110.5 109.2 109.6 111.9 16-Aug AL Row Boat B Trailer BCK 110.5 110.9 113.1 110.9 112.5 18-Aug AL Row Boat C Trailer BCK 110.5 109.2 110.5 110.5 113.9 18-Sep FG Aquarius sailboat Trailer SPL 97.7 103.7 111.4 110.7 107.0 109.6 114.4 Boats less than 17 ft 16-Aug AL Crestliner 1650 FishHawk Trailer BLG 107.7 101.9 111.6 111.1 112.8 17-Aug AL Alumacraft Tourn. 185 sport Trailer BLG 111.1 111.6 112.8 17-Aug AL Auminum boat Trailer BLG 110.0 111.4 112.2 18-Aug AL Tracker Targa V165 Trailer BLG 111.1 111.1 113.6 9-Sep AL Lund "Mr. Pike" Trailer BLG 111.4 112.5 110.9 111.8 113.4 16-Aug FG Rinker V170 Trailer BLG 110.7 111.4 110.7 110.9 113.3 16-Aug FG Rinker V170 Trailer BLGdrain 110.9 110.5 111.1 111.4 111.6 18-Sep FG Glastron SX 175 Water BLG 113.6 112.5 110.3 110.3 114.7 Boats greater than 17 ft 16-Aug AL Lowe Roughneck Trailer BLG 113.4 113.6 112.7 112.7 113.9 18-Aug AL Monarch Little Giant Water BLG 97.7 100.1 107.3 112.5 113.0 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Trailer BLG 113.1 112.5 113.1 113.1 114.1 16-Aug FG Carver Water BLG 109.0 109.2 108.3 107.5 114.6 16-Aug FG Four Winns 248 Vista Water BLG 106.8 110.3 110.7 110.3 112.7 16-Aug FG Crownline 242 Water BLG 110.5 104.5 106.2 95.4 113.1 17-Aug FG Boston Whaler Water BLG 112.2 112.2 117.5 106.0 114.2 1-Sep FG Nautaline houseboat Water BLG1 110.9 102.1 109.4 102.5 97.9 112.0 113.7 1-Sep FG Nautaline houseboat Water BLG2 111.4 102.7 110.7 102.9 100.1 112.0 114.3 1-Sep WD Owens Water BLG 109.8 112.7 111.6 112.9 114.4 1-Sep WD ChrisCraft Cavalier Water BLG1 107.7 75.1 92.7 96.4 100.7 105.2 113.5 1-Sep WD ChrisCraft Cavalier Water BLG2 107.7 78.6 96.9 95.0 103.3 103.9 112.5 8

Figure A: Boat name, test type, and sensor location (letter) for 8-16-16. 9

Figure B: Boat name, test type, and sensor location (letter) for 8-17-16 and 8-18-16. 10

Figure C: Boat name, test type, and sensor location (letter) for 9-1-16, 9-9-16, and 9-18-16. 11

Figure D: Anchor compartments and center compartments (A), and livewell (B) test results, maximum temperature reached during each trial for each sensor. Test type code (LW = livewell, AN = anchor compartment, CC = central compartment). Average temperature (Ave in) of the inflow during the test. 12

Figure E: Bilge test results, maximum temperature reached during each trial for each sensor (A: boats <21 ft, B: boats>21ft, C: open hull). Location (Trailer = boat out of water and Water = boat in water). Test ((BLG = bilge, BLGcom = compartment like bilge, BCK = back of open hulled boat, BLGdrain = water in from drain hole, SPL = splash compartment)). Average temperature (Ave in) of the inflow during the test. 13

Figure F: Livewell temperature (letter code), temperature (F) of water entering compartment, and times of testing for 4 boats. 14

Figure G: Livewell temperature (letter code), temperature (F) of water entering compartment, and times of testing for 4 additional boats. 15

Figure H: Anchor compartment temperature (letter code), temperature (F) of water entering compartment, and times of testing. 16

Figure I: Central compartment temperature (letter code), temperature (F) of water entering compartment, and times of testing. 17

Figure J: Bilge compartment temperature (letter code), temperature (F) of water entering compartment, and times of testing for boats less than 21 ft long. 18

Figure K: Bilge compartment temperature (letter code), temperature (F) of water entering compartment, and times of testing for boats less than 21 ft long. 19

Figure L: Bilge compartment temperature (letter code), temperature (F) of water entering compartment, and times of testing for boats greater than 21 ft long. 20

Figure M: Bilge compartment temperature (letter code), temperature (F) of water entering compartment, and times of testing for boats greater than 21 ft long. 21

Figure N: Mean maximum sensor temperature for location and hull type in bilge tests. Error bars represent +/- 1 standard deviation. Analysis of Variance test used to test differences between hull type for trailer boats and water boats separately (Hull type on trailer p=0.34 and hull type in water p=0.23). When only hull type was tested (location not considered), there was also no significant difference in temperature (ANOVA p=0.19). Bars with the same letter are statistically the same. Statistical analysis with JMP Pro 12, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 22

Figure O: Mean bilge sensor temperature by location of boat. Analysis of Variance test used to test differences between temperatures of bilge compartments for location of boats (trailer v. water; Location p =0.0048). Error bars represent +/- 1 standard deviation. Bars with the same letter are statistically the same. Statistical analysis with JMP Pro 12, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 23

Figure P: Water input temperature and output temperature at drain point for livewell (LW) testing. 24

Figure Q: Water input temperature and output temperature at drain point for anchor (AN) and center (CC) compartment testing. 25

Figure R: Water input temperature and output temperature at drain point for bilge compartment testing in boats smaller than 21 ft. Cycling on and off of bilge pump caused the fluctuation in outflow temperature. 26

Figure S: Water input temperature and output temperature at drain point for bilge compartment testing in boats larger than 21 ft. Cycling on and off of bilge pump caused the fluctuation in outflow temperature. 27

Figure T: Water input temperature and output temperature at drain point for bilge compartment testing in boats larger than 21 ft. Cycling on and off of bilge pump caused the fluctuation in outflow temperature. 28