CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Similar documents
Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

GENERAL. 1. Description

DRAFT Montgomery County Bicycle Master Plan Design Toolkit

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Roadways. Roadways III.

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

4.1 CONTEXT. The existing terrain and sight conditions will affect available sight lines and approach speeds of bicyclists and motorists.

Figure 5-1 Complete Street Zones. Roadside. May include frontage, pedestrian throughway, furnishings and curbside areas.

Off-road Trails. Guidance

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

INTERSECTION DESIGN TREATMENTS

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

9. TRANSIT ACCOMMODATIONS

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Standards vs. Guidelines. Public Right-of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 3 Curb Ramps & Blended Transitions

A Survey of Planning, Design, and Education for Bikeways and Bus Routes on Urban Streets

Designing On Road Bikeways

INTRODUCTION. Intersections Treatments

Americans with Disabilities Act and Curb Ramps

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

Bicycle Facilities Planning

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

What Is a Complete Street?

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

CURB EXTENSIONS BULB OUTS DPS 201 NECKDOWNS

Who is Toole Design Group?

Color your stress away

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

On-Street Bicycle Facilities

ADA on Construction. Guidance for Section C Plan Preparers

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

Complete Streets Design Considerations. Second Street Corridor Complete Streets Workshop and Assessment Manchester, NH April 26, 2013

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES


Public Works Committee Meeting Richard E. Mastrangelo Council Chamber November 20, 2017

Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

Federal Highway Administration SEPARATED BIKE LANE PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDE

Appendix A Guiding Principles for Cycling Safety in Work Zones

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT ROUNDABOUTS

4.3 BICYCLE FACILITY DESIGN ELEMENTS

9. TRANSIT ACCOMMODATIONS

Retrofitting Urban Arterials into Complete Streets

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Field guide for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Edition

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Lawrence Avenue Streetscape Concepts August 30, 2011

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

THE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO CYCLING SAFELY IN PHILADELPHIA

Clybourn Ave. Protected Bike Lane Study Halsted St. to Division St.

Walk Friendly Communities Engineering Strategies. Carl Sundstrom Walk Friendly Communities Workshop Grandview, MO June 2015

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

General Design Factors

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Walking Along the Road. Module 2

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

Table of Contents. Introduction. Prompt List Arterials and Streets. Prompt List Interchange. Prompt List Intersections. Prompt List Limited Access

Montclair s Complete Streets Experience

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Including Revision 1 dated May 2012 and Revision 2 dated May 2012

CHECKLIST 5: ROADWORK TRAFFIC SCHEME AUDIT

Design Overview. Section 4 Standard Plans for Design. Pedestrian Access Routes. Pedestrian Access Routes. Overview. Cross Slope

INTERSECTIONS AT GRADE INTERSECTIONS

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

14 TH STREET TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE DESIGN STUDY PLAN B PLAN B TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Considerations in the Review and Approval of a Driveway in Your Jurisdiction

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Typical Cross Section: DOWNTOWN (Observer Highway - 8th Street)

Transcription:

5 CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN This chapter provides design guidance for separated bike lanes adjacent to curbside activities including parking, loading and bus stops. Typical configurations are presented for mid-block and intersection locations. Curbside activities often present daily challenges for people with disabilities. Design guidance presented in this chapter conforms to federal and state accessibility requirements to ensure that separated bike lane designs adhere to accessibility standards: Proposed Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way, United States Access Board 0 (or subsequent guidance that may supersede these guidelines in the future) Massachusetts Architectural Access Board (AAB) Rules and Regulations (5 CMR) - 006

5. ON-STREET MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING 5.. CONVENTIONAL MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING On-street motor vehicle parking increases the comfort of people bicycling in the separated bike lane by providing physical separation (see EXHIBIT 5A). On-street motor vehicle parking can also coexist with contra-flow separated bicycle lanes since risk of injury from dooring to a contra-flow cyclist is much smaller than when riding with the flow of traffic due to the reduced frequency of passenger door openings and the passenger visibility of on-coming cyclists. On-street parking is typically common along roadways through more developed areas such as village and town centers, urban neighborhoods and central business districts. Compatible with street, intermediate or sidewalk level separated bike lanes. ft. street buffer recommended ( ft. minimum) when adjacent to on-street parking to avoid conflicts with motor vehicle doors. It may not be necessary to provide vertical objects adjacent to on-street parking, except in locations where parking is absent, such as near intersections. Vertical objects should be provided in all locations where on-street parking is prohibited for portions of the day, commercial areas where on-street parking turnover is high, or locations where parking demand is low. Locate vertical objects in a manner that minimizes conflicts with motor vehicle doors. Ensure parking does not encroach into the intersection approach clear space (see Section 4..5). Locate parking meters on a raised median in the street buffer. Where raised median is too narrow, place parking meters in the sidewalk buffer zone near a crosswalk. EXHIBIT 5A: CONVENTIONAL ON-STREET MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING (MID-BLOCK) rec. 9

5.. ACCESSIBLE MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING PROWAG R4 requires a minimum number of accessible on-street parking spaces on a block perimeter where marked or metered on-street parking is provided. Proximity to key destinations or roadway grades may require locating accessible parking on a block face with separated bike lanes. Refer to PROWAG R09 for accessible parking guidance and PROWAG R0.7 for surface guidance. The bike lane may be narrowed to 4 ft. at accessible parking spaces with a design exception. A 5 ft. minimum street level access aisle is required where sidewalk width exceeds 4 ft. It must be free from obstructions, extend the full length of the parking space and connect to a pedestrian access route via curb ramp or blended transition. Where an access aisle is not required, signed accessible space must be located at the end of the block face and adjacent sidewalk must be free of obstructions for vehicle lift deployment. Rear access aisles are recommended for driver side access to the sidewalk. Place RESERVED PARKING (R7-8) and, if applicable, VAN ACCESSIBLE (R7-8P) sign at the head of each accessible parking space. 4 5 MID-BLOCK LOCATIONS Locate accessible parking at a midblock location (see EXHIBIT 5B) where intersection locations are infeasible or if proximity to a specific destination is advantageous. EXHIBIT 5B: ACCESSIBLE ON-STREET MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING (MID-BLOCK) 4 5 5 rec. 0 min. 8 min. 4 5 min. 5 4 min.* 6 min. * A bike lane width narrower than 5 ft. requires a design exception. 9

EXHIBIT 5C: ACCESSIBLE ON-STREET MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING (INTERSECTION) 5 rec. 0 min. 6 min. 8 min. 5 min. 6 min. 4 min.* * A bike lane width narrower than 5 ft. requires a design exception. INTERSECTION LOCATIONS Locate accessible parking near an intersection to connect to curb ramps (see EXHIBIT 5C). Where feasible, avoid placing accessible spaces in near-side locations to preserve intersection approach clear space (see Section 4..5). Consider side street locations for accessible parking where far-side placement conflicts with bus operations. 5 rec. 0 min. 5 min. 8 min. Pedestrian crossing islands with cutthroughs are recommended to prevent parking encroachment. 6 min. 4 min.* A rear access aisle may abut pedestrian crossing island in constrained situations. * A bike lane width narrower than 5 ft. requires a design exception. 94

5. LOADING ZONES Designated loading zones may accommodate passenger loading (e.g., pick-up and drop-off at schools, hotels, hospitals, taxi stands, etc.), commercial loading (e.g., goods or parcel deliveries), or both. 5.. COMMERCIAL LOADING Commercial loading zones are often a restricted and managed portion of conventional on-street parking. They are typically longer than a single parking space to accommodate large commercial vehicles. They are not required to be accessible, and designers should follow conventional on-street parking guidance in Section 5... 5.. PASSENGER LOADING PROWAG R0 requires at least one accessible loading zone per 00 ft. of continuous loading zone space when passenger loading is provided (see EXHIBIT 5D). Refer to PROWAG R0 for accessible passenger loading guidance and PROWAG R0.7 for surface guidance. The bike lane may be narrowed to 4 ft. at accessible loading zones with a design exception. Length of the passenger loading zone should accommodate the length of the typical passenger vehicle that will use the zone. Longer zones may be needed if vehicle queues are anticipated. The access aisle must be at the same level as the motor vehicle pull-up space. It must be free from obstructions, extend the full length of the accessible loading zone and connect to a pedestrian access route via curb ramp or blended transition. Curb ramps are recommended to accommodate dollies/hand trucks. Place NO PARKING LOADING ZONE (R7-6) at the rear and head of an accessible loading zone. 4 EXHIBIT 5D: ACCESSIBLE LOADING ZONE (MID-BLOCK WITH PARKING) 0 min. (longer shown) 4 8 min. 5 min. 4 4 min.* * A bike lane width narrower than 5 ft. requires a design exception. 95

In locations without on-street parking, a lateral deflection of the separated bike lane may be required to accommodate an accessible loading zone (see EXHIBIT 5E). Bike lane deflection should occur gradually, but not greater than a : taper to maintain bicyclist safety and comfort (see Section 4..). An appropriate sidewalk width, which is often wider than the minimum pedestrian access route, must be maintained. San Francisco, CA INTERSECTION LOCATIONS As demonstrated in EXHIBIT 5D, accessible loading zones are nearly identical to accessible on-street parking spaces. Designers should consult EXHIBIT 5C when designing accessible loading zones at intersections. EXHIBIT 5E: ACCESSIBLE LOADING ZONE (MID-BLOCK WITHOUT PARKING) 4 0 min. (longer shown) 4 4 min.* 5 min. 8 min. * A bike lane width narrower than 5 ft. requires a design exception. 96

5. ON-STREET BIKE PARKING EXHIBIT 5F: ON-STREET BIKE PARKING (MID-BLOCK) On-street bike parking reduces conflicts between bicyclists and pedestrians, helps preserve sidewalk width, provides direct connections to bike lanes, and increases bicycle parking capacity and visibility (see EXHIBIT 5F and EXHIBIT 5G). When converted to space for bicycle parking, a single on-street motor vehicle parking space can store up to 4 bicycles or 0 bike share bicycles, thus increasing overall parking capacity for adjacent businesses. Bike parking should be considered in locations with observed demand, for example where bicycles are locked to trees, signs, parking meters and other streetscape elements. Adjacent businesses may be willing to fund and/or maintain on-street bike parking, including bike share stations. EXHIBIT 5G: ON-STREET BIKE PARKING (INTERSECTION) rec. A ft. street buffer recommended ( ft. minimum) and should be free of obstructions. Parking should be flush with the bike lane or accessible by a mountable curb (see Section..4). Consider locating vertical objects between bike and motor vehicle parking to increase visibility for motorists and to protect bicycles from motor vehicle encroachment. rec. Locate bike parking close to destinations or transit connections. Bike share stations and temporary bike parking corrals may be removed seasonally for snow clearance and removal. 97

5.4 BUS STOPS Separated bike lanes can be integrated with a variety of bus stop designs. They are compatible with mid-block, near-side and far-side bus stop locations. Where feasible, separated bike lanes should be routed behind bus stops to eliminate conflicts between buses and bicyclists. This recommended configuration referred to as a floating bus stop repurposes the street buffer into a dedicated passenger platform between the motor vehicle lane and the bike lane. Bus passengers must cross the separated bike lane when entering and exiting the platform. Designers can communicate expectations for people bicycling and taking transit by following these principles to the maximum extent feasible: Seattle, WA Cambridge, MA Guide bus passengers across the bike lane at clearly marked locations. Provide clear direction to people bicycling when they are expected to yield to pedestrians crossing the bike lane at bus stops. Designers should consider in-lane bus stops to preserve space for the street buffer, maintain separated bike lane width, and simplify bus re-entry into traffic. Where on-street parking is present, a curb extension is required to provide an in-lane stop, as shown in EXHIBIT 5J. Vancouver, Canada Bus stops are natural locations for bike parking. Bike racks increase the catchment area of bus stops, providing a longer-range and faster first- and last-mile connection compared to walking. See to Section 5. for on-street bike parking. 98

EXHIBIT 5H: BUS STOP DESIGN ELEMENTS As determined by transit authority or local guidance 0 min. 5 min. 4 min. 4 shelter 8 min. 5 5 6 6- min. (see Section..) 4 min.* (see Section..) * A bike lane width narrower than 5 ft. requires a design exception. 5.4. DESIGN ELEMENTS All bus stops should include a common set of required design elements to provide accessible, high-quality transit service (see EXHIBIT 5H). Elements that may influence separated bike lane design are highlighted in this section. Designers should consult MBTA or local guidelines for more detail, including for the design of amenities beyond the scope of this Guide (e.g., trash receptacles, informational signage, etc.). Preserve a clear boarding and alighting area that connects to a pedestrian access route. Advanced lateral deflection of the bike lane may be necessary to accommodate the boarding and alighting area (see Section 4..). Maintain a pedestrian access route between the sidewalk, the boarding and alighting area, and shelters and benches. Two pedestrian crossings are recommended, but not required. Include a rear door clear zone connected to a pedestrian access route. It is preferable to have a continuous clear zone to connect the boarding and alighting area and the rear door clear zone. 4 Additional design elements are recommended to improve operations at bus stops. Transition the bike lane to sidewalk level in constrained situations or to provide level pedestrian crossings. Locate bicycle transition ramps near crosswalks and outside of any lateral shift of the bike lane. 5 Locate shelters and other vertical objects that are 6 in. or higher a minimum of 6- in. from the bike lane edge (see Section..). 6 Place railings or planters ( ft. maximum height) at the back of the platform for high ridership stops or along two-way separated bike lanes to channelize pedestrians to designated crossings. Ends of railings should be flared inward toward the bus stop and away from the bike lane for a safer bicycling environment. 99

EXHIBIT 5I: FLOATING BUS STOP (MID-BLOCK) 5.4. EXAMPLE CONFIGURATIONS The following exhibits present examples of separated bike lane and bus stop configurations. Each exhibit incorporates required and recommended design elements described in Section 5.4., and highlights unique considerations of each configuration. FLOATING BUS STOP (MID-BLOCK) EXHIBIT 5I shows a raised separated bike lane alongside a mid-block floating bus stop. This is a typical curbside stop located between parked motor vehicles, which minimizes traffic impacts by requiring the bus driver to pull into and out of the stop. Where street buffer is less than 8 ft., taper the bike lane to create space for the bus stop. Maintain an appropriate sidewalk width, which is typically wider than the minimum pedestrian access route. Consider railing or planters to channelize pedestrian access to and from busy bus stops. Narrow the bike lane along the bus stop to maintain an accessible sidewalk and bus stop in constrained areas. Where narrowed to 4 ft. (less than 5 ft. requires a design exception), elevate the bike lane to sidewalk level to minimize pedal strike risks on curbs. In the case of twoway facilities, a minimum width of 8 ft. should be used. 00

EXHIBIT 5J: FLOATING BUS STOP (INTERSECTION) 4 5 6 5 6 FLOATING BUS STOP (INTERSECTION) EXHIBIT 5J shows a street level separated bike lane alongside a far-side floating bus stop. Transit operators generally prefer farside stops because conflicts with crossing pedestrians and turning motor vehicles are minimized. This stop is located on a curb extension, also known as a bus bulb. Bus bulbs minimize the loss of on-street parking, simplify maneuvers for bus operators and provide more space for passenger amenities. Consider bus bulbs adjacent to separated bike lanes to preserve rightof-way for the separated bike lane and sidewalk. Consider railing or planters to channelize pedestrian access to and from busy bus stops. Integrate bus stop into the pedestrian crossing at the intersection for convenient access. 4 Ramp to street level pedestrian cutthrough must not exceed 8. percent. 5 Provide level landing at curb ramps (4 ft. by 4 ft. minimum). 6 0

EXHIBIT 5K: FLOATING BUS STOP (NEAR-SIDE) EXHIBIT 5K shows a raised separated bike lane alongside a near-side floating bus stop. When occupied by a bus, near-side stops reduce approach sight distance for right-turning motorists before crossing the separated bike lane (see Section 4..). Consider raised crossings if near-side bus stop diminishes motorist approach sight distance or increases the effective turning radius for motor vehicles. Consider railing or planters to channelize pedestrian access to and from busy bus stops. Locate near-side stop far enough from the cross street to provide space for a forward bicycle queuing area and, if applicable, a corner refuge island. 0

EXHIBIT 5L: FLOATING BUS STOP (FAR-SIDE) EXHIBIT 5L shows a two-way raised separated bike lane alongside a farside floating bus stop. The contra-flow direction of bicycle travel in a two-way separated bike lane introduces a potentially unexpected bicycle movement for bus passengers. Consider railing or planters to channelize pedestrian access to and from bus stops along two-way separated bike lanes. Consider agreements with businesses, community improvement districts or developers for long-term maintenance of planters. Use solid yellow line to discourage passing along a bus stop. Locate the top level landing in the street buffer, and not within the bike lane, wherever possible. 0

EXHIBIT 5M: CONSTRAINED BUS STOP Refer to Figure 8 of the FHWA Guide for constrained bus stop guidance for retrofit projects (i.e., paint, markings, objects and signs only). 4 CONSTRAINED BUS STOP EXHIBIT 5M shows a constrained bus stop, which elevates the bike lane to sidewalk level to avoid conflicts with buses but utilizes the bike lane as a portion of the bus stop platform. Bicyclists must yield to people boarding and alighting, and must proceed with caution at all other times to avoid conflicts with waiting passengers. 5 Constrained bus stops should only be considered when the introduction of a floating bus stop would do one of the following: Create non-compliant elements of the public right-of-way according to the most recent accessibility standards. Narrow the sidewalk below an appropriate width given pedestrian volumes and context of the built environment. Narrow the bike lane below 4 ft. along the bus stop (less than 5 ft. requires a design exception). Constrained bus stops require additional considerations: Place crosswalks with blended transitions at the boarding and alighting area and the rear door clear zone to align with bus doors. Coordinate with the local transit agency to identify vehicle type(s) anticipated to serve the stop. Provide combined bike lane and sidewalk width equal to at least 8 ft. to qualify as an accessible boarding and alighting area. Place DO NOT PASS WHEN BUS IS STOPPED sign in advance of the first pedestrian crossing a bicyclist approaches (i.e., the rear door clear zone). When included, place shelter and/or bench at the back of the sidewalk. 4 Consider optional colored pavement within the constrained bike lane. 5 04