WARM-SEASON TURFGRASS N RATES & IRRIGATION BMP VERIFICATION DEP WM 869 COMPLETED STUDIES REPORT. Principal Investigators

Similar documents
Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Karine Paré Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University Jan. 3, 2008

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

Objective: Rationale:

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

Figure 1: Map showing the relative location of the study sub-watersheds in Plymouth (south) and Maple Grove (north), MN.

Title: Solvita Soil Test Kits to Categorize Golf Course Fairway Responsiveness to Nitrogen Fertilization. Project Leader: Karl Guillard

1987 TURFGRASS SOIL RESEARCH REPORT. P. E. Rieke, M. T. McElroy and Douglas Lee Crop and Soil Sciences Department, M.S.U.

EFFICIENT IRRIGATION FOR RECREATIONAL TURF IN NEW ENGLAND: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND CROP COEFFICIENTS. Principal Investigators

2003 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

2000 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

Post-emergent Goosegrass Control in a Mixed Stand of Fairway Turf with Sulfentrazone (Dismiss) and Fenoxaprop (Acclaim Extra), 2006

Evaluation of Plant Growth Regulators and Fertilizer to Fairway Height Creeping Bentgrass J.A. Borger and M.B. Naedel 1

Minimum Daily Light Integral Requirements for Warm-Season Fairway/Tee and Rough Cultivars: Mowing Height and Growth Regulator Interactions

Sep (Dollar spot fungicide Trial 2012) Site Description Page 1 of 14 University of California, Riverside

Using soil content of plant-available nitrogen as a tool for diagnosing turfgrass damage

Early Dollar Spot Disease Control for Chicago Fairways

Table 1. Key plant indicators observed during the study period. 75% green-up 100% green-up. Annual bluegrass 75% boot 16 April

Comparison of MON76980 (Xtendimax) and Liberty Herbicide Systems for weed control in Soybeans at Rochester, MN in SUMMARY:

Properties. terc.ucdavis.edu 8

2017 Cricket Frass as a Potential Nitrogen Fertility Source

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

Heat stress separates old and new bentgrasses

Objective. Rationale. How It Was Done

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Turf Screen Solar protectant tests on creeping bentgrass Agrostis stolonifera L. plant quality under stress conditions.

2017 Turfgrass Proceedings

The Summer of 2007: A Look at Niagara

National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) 2008 Bentgrass Fairway Variety Trial Progress Report. J. S. Ebdon, Ph. D., and W. T.

DROP SPREADER CALIBRATION PROCEDURES

CCoWS. Central Coast Watershed Studies. Summary of Precipitation and Streamflow for Potrero and San Clemente Creeks in 2010

Evaluation of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus (TYLCV)-resistant Tomato Varieties in Commercial Conditions

Turfgrass Entomology Research 2006

TURFGRASS WEAR 1. Dr. James B. Beard Department of Soil and Crop Sciences Texas A&M University

2012 Turfgrass Pathology Field Research

Civitas + Harmonizer with or without Low Rates of Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Putting Greens in Washington

P artners in. Peanut Variety Tests. rogress. C. B. Godsey and W. Vaughan Department of Plant and Soil Sciences. Variety Tests.

Evaluation of Burn Down Herbicides Before Overseeding Fairways

Economics of Spice Pepper Production in Oklahoma 1

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

FERTILIZATION GUIDE FOR WARM-SEASON GOLF COURSE TURF

Prionus Mating Disruption and Trap Capture in Sweet Cherry 2011

2014 EVALUATION OF HOUSE FLY DEMONSTRATION. COOPERATORS: James Colby Moreland and Jody & Robin Thomas

Shaun N. Casteel, Purdue University Extension Soybean Specialist

National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) 2008 Bentgrass Green Test Progress Report. J. S. Ebdon, Ph. D., and W. T.

Final Report for Horticulture Australia Ltd Project TU04001 (30 th May 2008)

POLYCULTURE OF GRASS CARP AND NILE TILAPIA WITH NAPIER GRASS AS THE SOLE NUTRIENT INPUT IN THE SUBTROPICAL CLIMATE OF NEPAL

MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AFFECTING PUTTING GREEN SPEED. The management practices identified in the survey of golf courses

What to Do about Mixed-Species (Heinz 57) Fairways on Golf Courses: Eliminating Perennial Ryegrass with Corsair & Update on Controlling Earthworms

THE EFFECT OF NITROGEN FERTILITY ON GROWTH AND QUALITY OF VELVET BENTGRASS AND CREEPING BENTGRASS

Bayer Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Fairways in Montana and Idaho (Final Report)

Dry Disturbance and Fish Reduction Produce Enhanced Crayfish Densities in a Freshwater Wetland

provide uniform green speeds from hole to hole on the same golf course.

2014 House Fly Densities around Dairies in Central Texas

Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center

Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. & Fish., Vol. 11, No.3:105 : 113 (2007) ISSN

Drought! When Do We Know It s Over?

Staying in Tune with South Florida s Water Cycle for Scientists, Managers, and Policy Makers in 5 Minutes per Week

Daba S. Gedafa, Ph.D., P.E. UND Civil Engineering

of various turfgrass species How to save irrigation water without sacrificing Turfgrass evapotranspiration coefficients

PESTICIDES: ARE GOLFERS SAFE?

Madison, WI Page 1

P artners in. Peanut Variety Test. rogress. C.B. Godsey, W. Vaughan, and B. Heister Department of Plant and Soil Sciences.

PS 310 Introduction to Turfgrass Management Syllabus Fall Semester Leon Johnson Hall

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Result Demonstration Report

Performance of New Bermudagrass Varieties in the Southeast. Kyley

Alberta Saskatchewan Manitoba Agriculture, Agriculture & Food Agriculture & Food Food and Rural Initiative WFTEST:

HRI s Mission: Copyright, All Rights Reserved

Final Report. Herbicide screening trial. Les Mitchell Eurofins Agrisearch. Project Number: TU13032

Putting Green and Sand/Soil

A Snapshot of Our Changing Climatology

Southern Illinois University BOLT Technology Herbicide Programs - Southern USA.

Water industry perspective on the main groundwater management challenges. Luke de Vial Head of Water Resources and Supply

Heat+Wind. Temperary midday wilt of L-93 creeping bentgrass fairway, Lemont. Settle

Syngenta/Bayer Fungicide Trial: Reduced Rates of Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Fairways in Idaho and Washington

Navel orangeworm biology, monitoring, and management

Comparison of Two Yellow Sticky Traps for Capture of Western Cherry Fruit Fly (Rhagoletis indifferens) in Tart Cherry in Northern Utah 2015

Drought: What is the Status?

Establishing and Trafficking New Bentgrass Putting Greens

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Alberta Saskatchewan Manitoba Agriculture, Agriculture & Food Agriculture & Food Food and Rural Initiative WFTEST:

PRODUCING A TROPHY LARGEMOUTH BASS FISHERY (CASE STUDY) Greg Grimes President of Aquatic Environmental Services, Inc.

Peanut Variety Test. C.B. Godsey and W. Vaughan Department of Plant and Soil Sciences progress made possible through OPC and NPB support

Michigan State University participates in the

Effects of Fungicides for Control of Spring Dead Spot Disease on Bermudagrass Turf in California

THE EFFECTS OF TURVES WITHIN A REFINED WOOD FIBER MAT (ECOMAT ) OVER PLASTIC. John Charles Sorochan A THESIS

Greens Grade Fertilizer Comparisons Sustane - Simplot GreensKote

138 Trop Anim Prod :2

Chester Golf Club Water Study 2017 APPENDIX

MBMG Butte Mine Flooding Monthly Report BMFOU Consent Decree BU-SEH Remedial Action Monitoring Program Contract No TO-35 September 2013

Amicarbazone, a Newer Herbicide for Annual Bluegrass Control In Bentgrass

Surface Firmness: Can we Manage it? Clint Waltz, Ph.D. Turfgrass Specialist

Rice Yield And Dangue Haemorrhagic Fever(DHF) Condition depend upon Climate Data

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report

Suburb Flyover Report

Site Description: LOCATION DETAILS Report Prepared By: Tower Site Report Date

TOTAL SAVINGS BUILT FOR DAY AFTER DAY. toro.com/triflex. When it comes to total savings, there s no competition. Do more with one machine

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

FINAL RESULTS OF ANTEP PERENNIAL RYEGRASS & TALL FESCUE VARIETY TRIAL (2007 & 2008)

Transcription:

WARM-SEASON TURFGRASS N RATES & IRRIGATION BMP VERIFICATION DEP WM 869 COMPLETED STUDIES REPORT Principal Investigators Dr. Laurie E. Trenholm University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences P.O. Box 11675 Gainesville, Florida 32611-675 (352) 273-4524, letr@ufl.edu Dr. John L. Cisar University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Ft. Lauderdale Research and Education Center (FLREC) 325 College Ave. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314 (954) 577-6336, jlci@ufl.edu Dr. J. Bryan Unruh University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences West Florida Research and Education Center (WREC) Jay Research Farm 4253 Experiment Drive, Hwy. 182 Jay, FL 32565 (85) 995-372 x18, jbu@ufl.edu Dr. Jerry B. Sartain University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences P.O. Box 1151 Gainesville, Florida 32611-675 352-392-7271 ext 33, sartain@ufl.edu This project and the preparation of this report were funded by a grant from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Contract #: DEP WM 869 Contract Manager: Dr. Mike Thomas April 212 1

Table 69. Effects of Irrigation regime and Nitrogen fertilization on clipping yield of Bahiagrass Factor 4/15 5/5 5/29 6/9 7/3 Irrigation ------------------------g/m 2 ------------------------- Regime.1 Daily 9.2 24.8 27.1b 55.5 12.5.5 3X/wk 9. 28.9 55.3a 6.1 133.8 Sig. ns ns ** ns ns N Rate (lb 1-1 yr -1 ). 1 4.6c 14.6b 25.6 36.5b 95.7c 2 6.bc 22.a 31.6 45.5b 19.1bc 4 14.6a 34.6a 56.8 74.1b 137.9ab 6 11.1ab 37.3a 5.9 75.4a 165.8a Sig. ** ** ns ** ** Irr. X N Interaction Sig. ns ns ns ns ns **, and ns refer to P <.1, and P >.5, respectively N SOURCE AND TIMING -FERTILIZER BLACKOUT STUDY MATERIALS AND METHODS The experiment was initiated June 3, 29 at the University of Florida Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center. Granular N sources (Table 7) were applied once to 6 replications of mature St. Augustinegrass at 2.lbs.N 1 ft. -2 and watered in with.12 inch irrigation immediately following application. The experimental area had not received any fertilization for a period of 4 months and plots were randomized based on turfgrass quality, color and density. A single lysimeter was installed into each 2m x 4m plot. Lysimeters were constructed of heavy grade plastic with a leachate outflow pipe located on the bottom. PVC pipes attached to each lysimeter were connected to gravity flow collection points adjacent to the plots. Turfgrass quality, color and density visual ratings (scale of 1-9 with 9=dark green, dense turf, 1=dead/brown turf, and 6=minimally acceptable turf) were taken throughout the experimental period. Turfgrass clipping samples were taken at a 3. inch height of cut approximately every 2 weeks or more when necessary. Tissue was oven dried at 6 C for a minimum of 48 hours before weighing. Percolate water samples were collected weekly or more frequently following a rain event exceeding.25 inch. Samples were acid preserved and shipped to the UF Analytical Research Lab in Gainesville for NO 3 -N analysis. All data were subjected to statistical analysis and significant means were identified. 88

Table 7. N sources and manufacturers. Code Description %N Manufacturer URE granular urea 46 PCS Sales, Inc. Northbrook, IL UXCU 7:3 urea:xcu 45 BS sewage sludge bio-solid 5 Milorganite, Milwaukee, WI PCU polymer coated urea 41 Pursell Inc., Sylacauga, AL XCU polymer coated urea 43 Agrium Advanced Technologies, AL RESULTS Turfgrass Quality, Color and Clipping Growth Turfgrass quality was significantly affected by fertilizer treatment on most observation dates and the readily soluble N treatments generally had the quickest response with some slow and controlled release N forms providing better turfgrass quality over timeframe within the blackout period and then after that period (Tables 2a-2b). In the no-n check, turfgrass quality dipped below the 6. minimally acceptable rating on 6/25 and was consistently the lowest rated treatment (Tables 2a-2b). Turfgrass color ratings had similar treatment responses (Tables 3a-3b). Turfgrass clipping growth responded to the application of the various forms of N as anticipated by the availability of N from the N sources (Tables 4a-4b). The controlled release source PCU had the most clippings at the end of the reporting period while having the least early on (Tables 4a-4b). N Leaching and Climatological Data The trial was conducted during the rainy season months encompassing blackout period months. Thus, nearly 1 cm of rain and irrigation impacted the site during the trial months and June and July each had approximately 25 cm of rain (Figure 18). Nitrate-N leaching was significantly-affected by N treatment with the urea treatment having the most cumulative leaching followed by the 7:3 soluble/slow combination treatment and other treatments (Table 74a-e, Figure 19). The 3 slow or controlled release N products had Nitrate-N leaching totals that were statistically equal to the no-n check, were lower than the urea treatment, and statistically-equal to the 7:3 combination treatment (Tables 74a-e). Most of the leaching occurred during the first month after application (Table 74a). Thereafter, there were no significant differences in leaching. In conclusion, while the application of N at a high rate to compensate for black out restrictions improved visual ratings and growth, there was increased N leaching from turf receiving readily-available N. Using complete slow or controlled-release N reduced N leaching to statistically-equal amounts achieved the no- N check and improved turfgrass visual ratings and growth at the end of the study. 89

Table 71a. N Timing: Turfgrass quality ratings. TRT 5/18/9 6/15 6/22 6/25 7/2 7/1 7/2 8/6 URE 6.8 7.8a 7.9a 8.2bc 7.3b 7. 7.2a 6.6b UXCU 6.8 7.8a 7.9a 8.6ab 8.1a 6.7 7.a 6.8ab BS 6.7 6.9bc 7.2b 7.8c 7.2b 7.3 7.3a 6.7b PCU 6.7 6.5c 5.8c 5.7d 6.1c 6.8 7.3a 7.2a XCU 6.5 7.2b 8.1a 9.a 8.4a 6.9 7.4a 6.8ab CHK 6.7 6.5c 6.c 5.8d 5.7c 6.3 5.8b 5.4c Signif. ns ** ** ** ** ns ** ** ns and ** = P>.5 and P<.1 Turfgrass quality ratings based on a 1-9 scale with 9=dark green turf, 1=dead/brown turf, and 6=minimally acceptable turf. Table 71b. N Timing: Turfgrass quality ratings. TRT 8/21/9 9/3 9/18 1/2 URE 6.4b 6.5ab 6.8b 6.7b UXCU 6.5b 6.2b 6.4b 6.4b BS 6.8b 6.7ab 7.2ab 6.8ab PCU 7.4a 7.a 7.7a 7.5a XCU 6.8b 6.6ab 6.7b 6.5b CHK 5.6c 5.4c 5.5c 5.3c Signif. ** ** ** ** ** = P<.1 Turfgrass quality ratings based on a 1-9 scale with 9=dark green turf, 1=dead/brown turf, and 6=minimally acceptable turf. 29 SUMMER BLACKOUT TEST: QUALITY 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 18-May 15-Jun 22-Jun 25-Jun 2-Jul 1-Jul 2-Jul 6-Aug 21-Aug 3-Sep 18-Sep 2-Oct URE UXCU BS PCU XCU CHK Figure 15. N Timing Blackout Test: Overall visual quality from 18 May 2 Oct. 29. 9

Table 72a. N Timing: Turfgrass color ratings. TRT 5/18/9 6/15 6/22 6/25 7/2 7/1 7/2 8/6 URE 6.4 8.1a 8.3a 8.2b 7.7b 7.2 7.3a 6.7b UXCU 6.6 8.a 8.3a 8.4ab 8.5a 6.8 7.2a 7.1ab BS 6.3 7.3b 7.4b 7.4c 7.4b 7.7 7.4a 7.ab PCU 6.3 6.8bc 6.3c 5.6d 6.3c 7.1 7.5a 7.4a XCU 6.3 7.2b 8.6a 9.a 8.6a 7.3 7.7a 7.3a CHK 6.5 6.5c 6.1c 5.5d 5.8c 6.3 6.b 5.6c Signif. ns ** ** ** ** ns ** ** ns and ** = P>.5 and P<.1 Turfgrass color ratings based on a 1-9 scale with 9=dark green turf, 1=dead/brown turf, and 6=minimally acceptable turf. Table 72b. N Timing: Turfgrass color ratings. TRT 8/21/9 9/3 9/18 1/2 URE 6.7b 6.8b 6.8b 6.2b UXCU 6.9b 6.6b 6.6b 5.9b BS 6.9b 6.8b 7.1ab 6.3b PCU 7.4a 7.5a 7.5a 7.2a XCU 7.b 6.8b 6.9ab 6.2b CHK 6.1c 5.8c 5.8c 5.3c Signif. ** ** ** ** ** and * = P<.1 and P<.5 Turfgrass color ratings based on a 1-9 scale with 9=dark green turf, 1=dead/brown turf, and 6=minimally acceptable turf. 29 SUMMER BLACKOUT TEST: COLOR 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 18-May 15-Jun 22-Jun 25-Jun 2-Jul 1-Jul 2-Jul 6-Aug 21-Aug 3-Sep 18-Sep 2-Oct URE UXCU BS PCU XCU CHK Figure 16. N Timing Blackout Test: Overall visual color from 18 May 2 Oct. 29. 91

29 SUMMER BLACKOUT TEST: CLIPPING YIELDS g/m2 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 URE UXCU BS PCU XCU CHK 1 15-Jun 22-Jun 2-Jul 1-Jul 2-Jul 6-Aug 21-Aug 3-Sep 18-Sep 2-Oct Figure 17. N Timing Blackout Test: Clipping tissue growth from 15 June Oct. 2, 29. Table 73a. N Timing: Turfgrass clipping yields. TRT 6/15/9 6/22 7/2 7/1 7/2 URE 15.6a 27.8a 46.2ab 36.8a 38.5b UXCU 14.1a 23.2a 42.4b 33.1a 33.7b BS 8.b 11.9b 27.6c 3.a 34.2b PCU 7.8b 5.8b 1.1d 13.9b 21.4c XCU 1.5ab 21.9a 55.3a 41.1a 48.7a CHK 7.8b 3.9b 8.1d 8.2b 9.1d Signif. * ** ** ** ** * and ** = P<.5 and P<.1.Table 73b. N Timing: Turfgrass clipping yields. TRT 8/6/9 8/21 9/3 9/18 1/2 URE 37.5b 36.8ab 13.8b 48.8b 34.6b UXCU 31.5b 34.8b 12.1b 43.5b 32.2b BS 35.2b 37.3ab 15.8b 48.8b 35.1b PCU 32.1b 48.5ab 27.9a 7.1a 53.6a XCU 51.4a 5.7a 18.5b 52.1b 35.1b CHK 8.8c 9.4c 3.9c 24.1c 14.2c Signif. ** ** ** ** ** ** and ns = P<.1 and P>.5 92

Monthly Precipitation & Irrigation 3 25 cm 2 15 1 Precip Irrigation 5 JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPT OCTOBER 29 Figure 18. N Timing Blackout Test: Rainfall and irrigation June October 29. Table 74a. N Timing: NO 3 -N leached (mg m -2 ) TRT 6/3/9 6/8 6/1 6/15 6/17 6/24 6/29 URE 9.3 6.5 117.3a 799.5a 985.6a 24.7 UXCU 3.1 2.8 565.1ab 127.b 522.4ab 38.7 BS 13.2 8.2 55.6b 28.4b 5.9b 24.5 PCU 5.1 5.3 22.7b 3.8b 34.4b 7.1 XCU 4.4 1.5 34.4b 18.6b 189.7b 32.9 CHK.8.3 4.5b.b 9.1b.8 Signif. ns ns ns ** ** ** ns ns and ** = P>.5 and P<.1 Table 74b. N Timing: NO 3 -N leached (mg m -2 ) TRT 7/1/9 7/3 7/6 7/15 7/2 7/27 URE 14.5 2.3.1 9.8 9.6 6.7 UXCU 15. 6.2 1.2 16.8 17.5 13.7 BS 2.6 9.4 1.5 28.3 23. 19.9 PCU 16.3 9.3.5 12.5 27.1 2.8 XCU 25.4 1.5.4 9.2 42.4 19. CHK.4..4..7 3.3 Signif. ns ns ns ns ns ns ns = P>.5 93

Table 74c. N Timing: NO 3 -N leached (mg m -2 ) TRT 8/6/9 8/12 8/17 8/24 8/31 URE 1.5.... UXCU 9.5 2.5 41.1 13.4 38.8 BS 16. 1.8 33.2 1.4 12.9 PCU 24.3 3.6 38. 7.6 17.5 XCU 19.1. 3.3 2.2 18.1 CHK....3. Signif. ns ns ns ns ns ns = P>.5 Table 74d. N Timing: NO 3 -N leached (mg m -2 ) TRT 9/4/9 9/7 9/11 9/14 9/21 URE..3.1.. UXCU 1.64 2. 31.2 31.5 14.3 BS. 2. 12.7 1.3 7.1 PCU.7.6 13.8 18.2 7.4 XCU.6 2.2 23.3 28.1 7.2 CHK..2... Signif. ns ns ns ns ns ns = P>.5 Table 74e. N Timing: NO 3 -N leached (mg m -2 ) TRT 9/28/9 1/6/9 TOTAL (6/8/9-1/6/9) URE.. 3111.2a UXCU 25. 39.6 1596.4b BS 9.9 9.5 48.7bc PCU 8. 1.7 37.4bc XCU 15.1 24.1 541.4bc CHK.. 2.5c Signif. ns ns ** ns and ** = P>.5 and P<.1 94

29 SUMMER BLACKOUT TEST: NITRATE LEACHING (mg/m2) 12 1 8 6 4 2 8-Jun 1-Jun 15-Jun 17-Jun 24-Jun 29-Jun 1-Jul 3-Jul 6-Jul 15-Jul 2-Jul 27-Jul 6-Aug 12-Aug 17-Aug 24-Aug 31-Aug 4-Sep 7-Sep 11-Sep 14-Sep 21-Sep 28-Sep 6-Oct Figure 19. N Timing Blackout Test: Nitrate Leaching from 8 June October 6, 29. URE UXCU BS PCU XCU CHK 95