Connecticut River American Shad Sustainability Plan Update

Connecticut River American Shad Sustainability Plan Update September 2017 Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Introduction Update to Initial Connecticut Plan implemented beginning with the 2013 fishing season The Connecticut River supports the state s only commercial shad fishery. Currently there is a commercial drift gill net fishery that occurs south of River Kilometer (Rkm) 64 to the mouth of the CT River. The Connecticut River is also the only river in the state in which recreational harvest (via hook and line only) is currently permitted. The recreational fishery occurs in the range north of Hartford, Connecticut (Rkm 84) and south of the Holyoke Dam in Massachusetts (Rkm 139). Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Monitoring Overview American shad fishery data is collected from mandatory annual reporting of commercial landings while recreational fisheries are monitored periodically by a roving creel survey. The Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildlife monitors fish passage which includes adult American shad passage at the first main stem dam (Rkm 139) on the Connecticut River in Holyoke, Massachusetts. Since 1978, Juvenile shad are monitored by CT DEEP through an annual seine survey. Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Commercial Fishery The shad fishery is managed through area, gear, and season restriction as well as rest days. The American shad gill net season runs from April 1 through June 15. A high proportion of license holders exceed age 55 as few new participants have entered the fishery in the last decade. Numbers of fishermen, effort, catch and harvest have all varied greatly over time. Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Connecticut River American Shad Commercial Landings, 1990-2016 Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Recreational Fishery Angling for American shad is the only legal method of recreational take and may occur during the open season from April 1 through June 30. Permits are required and the daily possession limit is 6 American and hickory shad in the aggregate, per person, in both the inland and marine districts Similar to commercial fishing trends, recreational fishing for American shad has exhibited a general decline in recent decades. Anecdotal and creel information gathered in the last ten years shows that fewer fishermen are targeting American shad in the traditional shad fishing areas. Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Connecticut River American Shad Recreational Landings, 1990-2016 Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Fishery Independent Monitoring Holyoke Lift Passage Counts-Information on the number of fish lifted daily, the number of lift days (days the lift is in operation) and the daily sex ratio at Holyoke are currently obtained from the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries. Juvenile Abundance Indices (JAI)-Annual American shad reproductive success has been monitored in the Connecticut River since 1978 by collecting juvenile American shad in a beach seine survey and calculating an annual index of relative abundance. Seining is conducted weekly from mid-july through mid-october at seven fixed stations located from Holyoke, MA to Essex, CT Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Sustainability Metrics 1) Response metric PASSAGE: the number of adult fish lifted at the first main stem dam in Holyoke MA. PASSAGE will be used as a proxy for total run size (i.e. adult stock). The trigger for PASSAGE is 140,000 fish. 2) Response metric RECRUITMENT: defined in Amendment 3 as three consecutive years of recruitment in the lower quartile of the time series. The American shad JAI seine survey will be used as the basis for the RECRUITMENT metric. This metric will provide an early warning of a recruitment failure or population decline due to poor stock reproduction. 3) Response metric ESCAPEMENT: a measure of fishing pressure on the stock expressed as the proportion of the total run escaping the fishery to spawn. A conservative trigger of 90% escapement was chosen to facilitate review of potential implications in the event of increasing fishery removals. Recent escapement has been in excess of 90% (1990-2016 median = 96%), but lower escapement rates were common through much of the time series with no evident diminishment in subsequent recruitment. Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

CT River Adult American Shad passed annually at the Holyoke Fishlift, 1975-2016. Blue line represents sustainability metric Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

CT River juvenile American Shad annual index of abundance, 1978-2016. Includes sustainability metric Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

CT River Adult American Shad proportion of escapement, 1990-2016. Blue line represents sustainability metric Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Summary CT proposed to continue using the three response metrics described here to determine sustainability of the CT River American shad fishery, as previously approved under Connecticut s initial Sustainable Fisheries Management Plan. The last four years of monitoring has produced positive metrics except for a single year when RECRUITMENT was negative Since the implementation of the CT SFMP, counts at the Holyoke fish lift and the JAI have increased, while landings have remained at modest levels resulting in adequate escapement. Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

North Carolina American Shad Sustainable Fishery Plan DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION ASMFC Shad and River Herring TC Holly White September 11, 2017

2 American Shad Area of Occurrence

Current Stock Status The 2007 ASMFC stock assessment stated American Shad stocks in the Albemarle Sound and Roanoke River were low but stable and suggested a benchmark total mortality rate (Z30) of 1.01. Annual estimates of mortality (Z) from the assessment indicate that values have fluctuated around the benchmark since 2000. Stock status for the other systems could not be determined due to no definitive trends in abundance. Even though stock status remains unknown out side of the Albemarle Sound the 2007 ASMFC stock assessment recommended a Z30 of 1.01 state wide. 3

2012 Plan Recap Indices North Carolina DMF and WRC conduct adult dependent and independent surveys to develop yearly indices of abundance for American Shad. These indices are used to establish management thresholds to maintain sustainable levels of harvest as approved in the 2012 Sustainable Fishery Plan. Albemarle/Roanoke System Female Relative Abundance (CPUE) Electrofishing Survey Roanoke River Female CPUE Independent Gill Net Survey (IGNS) Albemarle Sound Relative Fishing Mortality (F) - Albemarle Sound Annual roe commercial landings divided by a 3-year centered average of IGNS female CPUE Used independent data consistent with months and gear (5.0, 5.5, 6.0 ISM) used in commercial fishery. Tar-Pam, Neuse, Cape Fear Rivers Female CPUE Electrofishing Survey Relative F Annual roe commercial landings divided by a 3-year centered average of female CPUE Only used commercial and independent data from March-April. Department of Environmental Quality 4

2012 Plan Management Measures Implemented In 2013, Albemarle Sound female CPUE (IGNS) and the female relative F parameters exceeded the threshold for the third consecutive year. Management action required reductions in commercial landings: 37.9% reduction in Roe landings 50.2% reduction for Total landings Reduction was met through a modified commercial season in the Albemarle Sound, March 3-24, that has remained since 2014. 2014 41% reduction in Roe; 42% reduction in Total 2015 68% reduction in Roe; 68% reduction in Total 2016 78% reduction in Roe; 79% reduction in Total 2017 67% reduction in Roe; 67% reduction in Total Management actions were not required in other systems during the tenure of the 2012 Plan. Department of Environmental Quality 5

2018 Management Measures Recreational Creel Limits Joint, Coastal, and Inland Waters Albemarle Sound/Roanoke River, Neuse River 10-fish American and Hickory Shad in the aggregate, per person per day taken by hook-and-line, and only 1-fish may be an American Shad. Tar-Pamlico River 10-fish American and Hickory Shad in the aggregate, per person per day taken by hook-and-line. Cape Fear River 10-fish American and Hickory Shad in the aggregate, per person per day taken by hook-and-line, and only 5-fish may be an American Shad. All Other Areas 10-fish American and Hickory Shad in the aggregate, per person per day taken by hook-and-line. Department of Environmental Quality 6

Albemarle Sound March 3 to March 24. 2018 Management Measures Commercial Seasons Tar-Pamlico River, Neuse River February 15-April 14. Cape Fear River February 20 to April 11. All Other Areas February 15 to April 14. Department of Environmental Quality 7

2017 Plan Summary The 2017 plan represents the 5-year update to the original North Carolina Sustainable Fishery Plan (2013-2017) approved in 2012 by the ASMFC Shad and River Herring Management Board with two changes: 1. Relative F will now be computed by dividing commercial landings by a hind cast 3-year average of a survey index whereas the previous plan used a centered 3-year average 2. Thresholds (75 th and 25 th percentiles) for sustainability parameters are fixed using available survey data through 2017 and will remain fixed during the next 5-year management period. North Carolina requests recreational and commercial fisheries in all coastal rivers, and will use the management measures listed in this plan to ensure sustainability of these fisheries. 8

Female Relative F Centered v. Hind Cast The 2012 Plan relative F was computed by using a centered 3- year average, due to the short time series of data available. First and last year of the time series based only on two years of data. The hind cast 3-year average is determined to be more appropriate in the plan update, with an additional 5-years of data. The value of the final year in the time series (which can trigger management action) remains unchanged once calculated. 9

System Albemarle/ Roanoke Albemarle/ Roanoke Albemarle/ Roanoke Management Thresholds and Triggers Index Threshold Value Time Series Threshold Level Roanoke River Female CPUE 0.131 2001-2017 25 th percentile Albemarle Sound Female CPUE 0.02773 2000-2017 25 th percentile Female Relative F 1,740,876 2002-2017 75 th percentile Tar/Pamlico River Female CPUE 0.384 2000-2017 25 th percentile Tar/Pamlico River Female Relative F 20,243 2002-2017 75 th percentile Neuse River Female CPUE 0.1275 2000-2017 25 th percentile Neuse River Female Relative F 198,625 2002-2017 75 th percentile Cape Fear River Female CPUE 0.1115 2001-2017 25 th percentile Cape Fear River Female Relative F 186,354 2003-2017 75 th percentile Management Trigger 3 consecutive years below the threshold; does not trigger management by itself 3 consecutive years below the threshold 3 consecutive years above the threshold 3 consecutive years below the threshold 3 consecutive years above the threshold 3 consecutive years below the threshold 3 consecutive years above the threshold 3 consecutive years below the threshold 3 consecutive years above the threshold 10

Potential Management Measures The environmental circumstances under which a sustainability threshold may be reached can vary among systems. Therefore, different management measures may be used for each system in addressing the triggers. A suite of potential measures to be implemented is presented here and may be used singly or in combination: Restrictions on length of season to reduce effort (e.g., March 1 April 14) not to extend beyond the estuarine striped bass quotas being filled (avoids waste of striped bass and shad) Trip limits (this may result in discards) Reduce allowable number of yards (the 1,000-yard limit in Albemarle Sound could be considered in other areas) Area/season closure (e.g., area closure at mouth of Roanoke River from February mid-november since 1988) Only allow fishing certain days of the week (lift days) Recreational creel reduction Commercial harvest quota (although possible, this could be difficult to implement given existing resources) If two years of sustainability parameters exceeding thresholds are observed, a suite of management measures could be proactively developed and presented to Finfish and Regional Advisory Committees for implementation. 11

Albemarle/Roanoke System Commercial Harvest, All Gears (lb) Season Year Buck Roe Unclassified Total 2012 19,457 129,005 7 148,469 Feb 1 - Apr 14 2013 11,642 170,646 1,210 183,498 Feb 15 - Apr 14 2014 6,909 100,222 0 107,131 Mar 3 - Mar 24 2015 4,143 53,866 0 58,009 Mar 3 - Mar 24 2016 1,618 37,563 5 39,186 Mar 3 - Mar 24 2017 4,087 55,580 0 59,667 Mar 3 Mar 24 Department of Environmental Quality 12

Female Catch Per Unit Effort Independent Gill Net Survey Albemarle/Roanoke System Female Catch Per Unit Effort Electrofishing Survey Female Relative F Independent Gill Net Survey Exceeding the threshold Not exceeding the threshold Department of Environmental Quality 13

Tar/Pamlico River Commercial Harvest, All Gears (lb) Season Year Buck Roe Unclassified Total 2012 451 12,523 9 12,982 Feb 1 - Apr 14 2013 106 9,685 38 9,828 Feb 15 - Apr 14 2014 129 7,414 0 7,543 Feb 15 - Apr 14 2015 63 3,358 0 3,421 Feb 15 - Apr 14 2016 17 745 3 765 Feb 15 - Apr 14 2017 46 4,338 10 4,394 Feb 15 - Apr 14 20,000 18,000 16,000 14,000 Harvest (lb) 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Department of Environmental Quality 14

Tar/Pamlico River Female Catch Per Unit Effort Electrofishing Survey Female Relative F Electrofishing Survey Exceeding the threshold Not exceeding the threshold Department of Environmental Quality 15

Harvest (lb) Neuse River Commercial Harvest, All Gears (lb) Season Year Buck Roe Unclassified Total 2012 1,653 22,224 108 23,985 Feb 1 - Apr 14 2013 765 16,311 244 17,320 Feb 15 - Apr 14 2014 1,243 9,935 193 11,371 Feb 15 - Apr 14 2015 276 2,634 112 3,022 Feb 15 - Apr 14 2016 216 2,232 120 2,568 Feb 15 - Apr 14 2017 636 10,815 11,451 Feb 15 - Apr 14 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Department of Environmental Quality 16

Neuse River Female Catch Per Unit Effort Electrofishing Survey Female Relative F Electrofishing Survey Exceeding the threshold Not exceeding the threshold Department of Environmental Quality 17

Harvest (lb) Cape Fear River Commercial Harvest, All Gears (lb) Season Year Buck Roe Unclassified Total 2012 1,957 8,384 10,341 Feb 1 - Apr 14 2013 2,352 22,536 24,888 Feb 20 - Apr 11 2014 4,609 41,540 46,148 Feb 20 - Apr 11 2015 2,089 22,950 25,039 Feb 20 - Apr 11 2016 901 9,783 34 10,717 Feb 20 - Apr 11 2017 1,475 9,303 254 11,032 Feb 20 - Apr 11 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Department of Environmental Quality 18

Cape Fear River Female Catch Per Unit Effort Electrofishing Survey Female Relative F Electrofishing Survey Exceeding the threshold Not exceeding the threshold Department of Environmental Quality 19

Future Considerations Consider alternate means of calculating effort from the IGNS and possible incorporation of IGNS from Tar-Pamlico and Neuse Rivers as parameters. Consider incorporating uncertainty in relative F estimates. Consider use of alternative modeling approaches that can incorporate environmental parameters as model factors. Consider alternative ways to calculate Relative F including using recreational catch estimates and total catch from the independent surveys. Department of Environmental Quality 20

ASMFC Shad and River Herring TC Recommendations -- Add table summarizing benchmarks and responses -- Improve language in Section 3.1 on the application of management responses that will occur when thresholds are reached --Add language to show that there are not significant fisheries occurring in unmonitored rivers -- Recommend approval to the Board

American Shad Sustainable Fishing Plan Update South Carolina

Review Open and Closed Fisheries Review sustainability index and benchmark values for all Open fisheries Review conservation measures and gear restrictions put in place in 2013 to reduce the bycatch of sturgeon in the American Shad fishery

Fisheries Closed in 2012 Plan -Waccamaw River (Bull Creek to North Carolina Border) -Ashley River -Charleston Harbor -Wando River -Ashepoo River

Fisheries requested to remain Open (Recreational and Commercial) -Pee Dee River Run (Winyah Bay, Waccamaw and Pee Dee Rivers) -Black River -Santee Cooper System -Edisto River -Combahee River -Savannah River

Recreational no closed season, creel limit of 10 per day Commercial January 15 - April 15 or January 15 - April 1, Monday-Saturday, set and drift gillnets, no harvest limit Sustainability Benchmark - 25 th percentile of the annual mean CPUE for the last ten years - 3.41 kg shad/92 m net/hr

Recreational no closed season, creel limit of 10 per day Commercial no commercial fishery exists in the Cooper River by South Carolina regulation Sustainability Benchmark - 25 th percentile of the annual mean CPUE from the recreational fisheries, 2000-2015 0.66 shad/angling hour

Fishery Dependent Fishery Dependent Benchmark - 25 th percentile of the annual mean CPUE for the last ten years 1.8 kg of shad/92m net/hour Recreational no closed season, creel limit of 20 per day Commercial - January 15-March 15 or January 15 April 15, Monday - Saturday or Tuesday -Thursday, set and drift gillnets, no harvest limit Fishery Independent Benchmark - 25 th percentile of the annual mean CPUE from 2008-2015 7 shad/92m net/1 hour Fishery Independent

Recreational no closed season, creel limit of 10 per day (2017 proposal to reduce to 5) Commercial February 1- March 30, Tuesday-Saturday or Wednesday -Friday, set and drift gillnets, no harvest limit Sustainability benchmark - 25 th percentile of the annual CPUE mean for the last ten years of 0.43 kg of shad/92 m net/hour Request to maintain this fishery at a reduced level (2013 sturgeon bycatch restrictions), and will amend regulations if catch rates fall below the sustainability benchmark for three consecutive years

Recreational no closed season, creel limit of 10 per day Commercial January 1-April 15 or January 1-March 31, Wednesday (7am)-Saturday (7pm) or Tuesday (7am)-Friday (7pm), set and drift gillnets, no harvest limit Sustainability benchmark was developed using the 25 th percentile of the annual mean CPUE for the last ten years - 1.1 kg shad/92 m net/1 hour The fishery remained above the sustainability benchmark

Black River Confidential data due to 2 or fewer participants in the fishery Recreational no closed season, creel limit of 10 per day (current proposal to reduce to 5) Commercial January 15-April 15, Monday -Saturday, set and drift gillnets, no harvest limit Sustainability Benchmark - 25 th percentile of the annual mean CPUE for the last ten years 0.97 kg shad/92 m net/1 hour The fishery consists of only 2 fisherman and neither fisherman depends on their catch for commercial purposes. During the update period the fishery has remained above the sustainability benchmark

Combahee River Confidential data due to 2 or fewer participants in the fishery Recreational no closed season, creel limit of 10 per day (current proposal to reduce to 5) Commercial February 1- March 15, Tuesday-Friday, anchored gillnets, Monday-Saturday, drift gillnets, no harvest limit Sustainability Benchmark - 25 th percentile of the annual mean CPUE for the last ten years 0.53 kg shad/92 m net/1 hour Requests to maintain fishery at a reduced level (2013 sturgeon bycatch restrictions), and will amend regulations if catch rates fall below the benchmark for three consecutive years The fishery has remained above the sustainability benchmark for 5 of the previous 6 years

South Carolina considers all Open fisheries to be sustainable 95% of the commercial harvest occurs in the Winyah Bay and Santee Cooper system, and those stocks have been increasing over the last 40 years and have been relatively stable over the last 10 years Commercial fisheries in the Black, Edisto, and Combahee Rivers are small and the stocks in these rivers have remained stable but reduced from historic estimates. SCDNR has proposed additional protections for these stocks in the form of restricting commercial and recreational fisheries

Conservation Measures Recreational Fishery A proposal to reduce the creel limit from 10 to 5 fish/day in the Black, Edisto, and Combahee Rivers was completed and will be submitted to the South Carolina General Assembly for ratification Commercial Fishery The number of gillnets was restricted (via permit condition) beginning in 2013 to reduce the bycatch of sturgeon in the commercial fishery. This restriction was also included in a proposal to the South Carolina General Assembly for ratification. Additionally, the fishing area in the Savannah River was restricted to protect ~110 rkm of potential sturgeon spawning habitat Waterbodies Winyah Bay, Lower Waccamaw, Great Pee Dee, Santee and Savannah Rivers # nets/fisherman prior to 2013 # nets/fisherman currently 10 5 Edisto River 10 2 Black, and Combahee Rivers 10 1

ASMFC Shad and River Herring TC Recommendations -- Add table summarizing benchmarks and responses -- Improve language to define what management responses will occur if thresholds are reached -- For the next plan, evaluate additional biological and JAI metrics to use as plan benchmarks -- Consider joint coordination with NC on the Great Pee Dee River, and begin discussions with GA on common management responses for the Savannah River -- Recommend approval to the Board

GA Sustainable Fishery Management Plan Five coastal rivers- 2 open to commercial fishing All 5 legally open to recreational fishing Commercial fisheries open in Altamaha & Savannah rivers Recreational fisheries exist in two rivers- Savannah & Ogeechee No recreational fisheries in two rivers- Satilla & St. Marys Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

Commercial Landings (lbs in thousands) 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Altamaha River 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010* 2011* 2012* 2013* 2014 2015 Reported commercial landings, reported by pounds in thousands, of American shad from the Altamaha River, Georgia. Due to confidentiality agreements, data from 2010*-2013* have been excluded. Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

Altamaha River 600 60% Estimated number of fish in thousands 500 400 300 200 100 0 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Total Exploitation Rate % Estimate Exploitation Population estimates and exploitation rates from the Altamaha River American shad run. Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

Altamaha River 4 3.5 3 2.5 CPUE 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Altamaha River fishery-independent catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE-number caught per foot-hour) of American shad and the 1.11 shad/ft-hr benchmark developed from GADNR gill-net tagging data. Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

Altamaha Summary Landings have remained relatively stable over last 15 years. Population estimate has remained above 200,000 fish and exploitation below 20% since 2010. Independent gill netting CPUE has remained above the established benchmark of 1.11 shad/ft-hr. Propose maintaining the current benchmark and utilizing it for both commercial and recreational fisheries. No regulatory changes. Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

Savannah River is the only system for which GADNR utilized fishery dependent data to establish a sustainability benchmark. GADNR established a sustainability benchmark for CPUE (kg. shad/trip) of 25.5 be used to manage the Savannah River shad fishery. Year CPUE 5 yr. avg. 2005 52.68 40.18 2006 41.61 40.54 2007 30.24 40.36 2008 29.36 39.70 2009 25.50 38.76 2010 35.90 33.72 2011 33.69 30.79 2012 20.39 29.77 2013 58.78 36.53 2014 36.06 38.66 2015 37.74 39.07 2016 36.75 34.97 *red values indicate data is confidential Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

Savannah River 400 350 300 # Shad/hour 250 200 150 100 50 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Savannah River adult American shad electrofishing CPUE s collected below the New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam. Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

Savannah Summary Commercial CPUE of American shad has remained above current benchmark Adult electrofishing CPUE has remained high at New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam. Potential future FI metric for benchmark. Propose changing the current benchmark to the 25 th percentile to be consistent with SC: from 25.5 kg/trip to 9.03 kg shad/trip Utilize benchmark for both commercial and recreational fisheries No regulatory changes. Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

30 Ogeechee River 25 20 15 10 5 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Ogeechee River adult American shad electrofishing CPUE s and the proposed 3.7 shad/hr sustainability benchmark developed by GADNR. Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

Ogeechee River Summary Only open to recreational fishing No fishery independent data prior to 2010 Adult electrofishing CPUE ranged from 6.63-27.04 shad/hr from 2010-2015 Propose utilizing adult electrofishing data to establish a recreational fishery benchmark at the 25 th percentile Proposed benchmark is CPUE=3.7 shad/hr No regulatory changes. Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

Satilla and St. Marys Rivers Closed to commercial fishing Technically open to recreational fishing under a statewide regulation No evidence of any recreational fishery from creel survey data Shad are rarely found in spring electrofishing samples Do not see need to create regulations for non-existent fisheries. Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

ASMFC Shad and River Herring TC Review / Recommendations -- TC discussed the status of open fisheries with no monitoring or sustainability metrics -- Improve language on adaptive management for cases where benchmarks are exceeded -- Add section on future objectives including the development of biological metrics related to length, age, and JAI -- Recommend approval to the Board Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

2016 Shad and River Herring FMP Review and Compliance Presented to Shad and River Herring Management Board October 17, 2017

Millions of Pounds 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Shad & River Herring Commercial Landings 1950-2016 Source: ASMFC Compliance Reports River Herring American Shad 0 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Required Passage Counts ME, NH, MA, RI, CT, PA, MD, and SC Coastwide: 5.51 million river herring Coastwide: 540,917 shad

Coastwide Stocking Occurring in ME, MA, RI, PA, DE, MD, VA, NC, SC, & GA American shad: 23,535,342 Alewife: 974,728

Sturgeon Interactions 147 interactions were reported RI, CT, NJ, Delaware Bay, PRFC, VA, NC, SC, GA All released alive, with the exception of two fatalities.

Shad ME, NH, MA, FL De minimis Requests River herring NH, FL All of these states meet the requirements for de minimis.

Questions?