Travel Characteristics on Weekends:

Similar documents
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER

A comparison of weekend and weekday travel behavior characteristics in urban areas

The Case for New Trends in Travel

Appendix SEA Seattle, Washington 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Appendix PIT Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Travel Patterns and Characteristics

MODELING THE ACTIVITY BASED TRAVEL PATTERN OF WORKERS OF AN INDIAN METROPOLITAN CITY: CASE STUDY OF KOLKATA

Webinar: Development of a Pedestrian Demand Estimation Tool

Appendix MSP Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Appendix LOU Louisville, Kentucky 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

SoundCast Design Intro

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

Appendix PDX Portland, Oregon 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Appendix ELP El Paso, Texas 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

REGIONAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY:

Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Counts Methods and Technologies for Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection.

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile

EXPLORING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF SHORT TRIPS: IMPLICATIONS FOR WALK MODE CHOICE

Caltrain Bike Parking Management Plan

Summary of Travel Trends Findings from the 2017 NHTS. Nancy McGuckin, Travel Behavior Analyst Anthony Fucci, Westat

SUSTAINABILITY, TRANSPORT, & HEALTH. Ralph Buehler, Virginia Tech

Understanding the Pattern of Work Travel in India using the Census Data

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Planning in a World of Change NCTR Webinar, August 25, 2011

Eric Sundquist Managing Director State Smart Transportation Initiative (SSTI) Urban Sustainability Accelerator

Chapter 2 Current and Future Conditions

Appendix F: Detailed Modeling Results

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin

VI. Market Factors and Deamnd Analysis

Caltrain Bike Parking Management Plan

Richmond Area MPO Regional Transportation and Land Use Performance Measures 2013

Understanding Transit Demand. E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Appendix T 1: Additional Supporting Data

Commuting in America 2013

Set of plans containing details for game day operations of the Ballpark. Plans set forth the responsibilities and the specific actions of:

A Framework For Integrating Pedestrians into Travel Demand Models

Commuting in America 2013

Travel Demand. Dr. Susan Handy TTP 282 Intro Seminar 10/6/17

Travel Patterns and Cycling opportunites

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

Transportation-Demand Management Community Presentation

LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION MODELING IN THE BRISTOL URBANIZED AREA March 2008

Attitude towards Walk/Bike Environments and its Influence on Students Travel Behavior: Evidence from NHTS, 2009

Today s Agenda. Welcome & Introductions. I-526 Lowcountry Corridor Update. Table Discussions. Next Steps / Conclusion

BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE PREFERENCES A CASE STUDY OF DUBLIN

APPENDIX W OFF-MODEL ADJUSTMENTS

DRAFT. The HOV/HOT Alternative: Working Paper #3

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

METRO Light Rail: Changing Transit Markets in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area

Vision Public Workshop: Findings

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft 2015 CLRP

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

Develop a Multi-Modal Transportation Strategy (Theme 6)

Traffic Safety Barriers to Walking and Bicycling Analysis of CA Add-On Responses to the 2009 NHTS

WELCOME. City of Greater Sudbury. Transportation Demand Management Plan

Early Understanding of Public Bikesharing in North America

Volume Studies CIVL 4162/6162

Evaluation of shared use of bicycles and pedestrians in Japan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY

Lessons from Copenhagen. John L Bowman 2013

Planning Daily Work Trip under Congested Abuja Keffi Road Corridor

City of White Rock. Strategic Transportation Plan. May 16, 2005

North West Non-Technical Summary of the Transport Assessment September 2011

Neighborhood Influences on Use of Urban Trails

Acknowledgements. Ms. Linda Banister Ms. Tracy With Mr. Hassan Shaheen Mr. Scott Johnston

Sustainable Transport Solutions for Basseterre, St. Kitts - An OAS funded project (Feb 2013-Feb 2015)

Webinar: Exploring Pedestrian Responsive Traffic Signal Timing Strategies in Urban Areas

Travel to Work Survey March % 58% 32% 9% 7% 5% 16% 20% 12% Headlines - Bristol LA Area. Main modes of travel (%)

APPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS

Policy and Strategy for Sustainable Urban Transport in Vietnam

June 3, Attention: David Hogan City of San Mateo 330 W. 2oth Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403

Assessing Level of Service for Highways in a New Metropolitan City

Making Dublin More Accessible: The dublinbikes Scheme. Martin Rogers Colm Keenan 13th November 2012

Safe Routes to School as a Transportation Control Measure: Impacts on the Emission Inventory

2009 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT: Six Congestion Reduction Strategies and Their. Effects on Mobility

Operationalizing Accessibility

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY

Investigating Commute Mode and Route Choice Variability in Jakarta using multi-day GPS Data

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

An Analysis of the Travel Conditions on the U. S. 52 Bypass. Bypass in Lafayette, Indiana.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

Stress Bikeway Network

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

NACTO Designing Cities Conference Project Evaluation: Tools for Measuring Success and Building Support. October 29, 2015

CHAPTER 8 APPLICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF CONGESTION MEASURES

TOWARDS A BIKE-FRIENDLY CANADA A National Cycling Strategy Overview

The Case for Roundabouts:

How Have Long-Distance Trips Changed Over the Past Decade? Experiences from AL, VT, and CA

Caltrain Bicycle Parking Management Plan DRAFT PROJECT SCOPE SUBMITTED TO CALTRANS FALL 2014

Transcription:

Travel Characteristics on Weekends: Implications for Planning and Policy Making Ram M. Pendyala Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of South Florida, Tampa Ashish Agarwal Cambridge Systematics, Cambridge, MA National Household Travel Survey Conference November 1-2, 2004 Washington, D.C.

Introduction Focus of travel demand analysis: Weekday travel behavior (typical) Weekday peak period travel demand Strategies to alleviate weekday peak period congestion Travel surveys heavily oriented towards weekday trip data collection Little attention, if any, paid to weekend travel demand characteristics

Motivation Growing congestion on weekends Different nature and spatial-temporal characteristics of trips on weekends Meeting people s weekend travel needs Infrastructure Strategies and policies Address explicitly in planning process

Motivation NCHRP 365 resource for estimating travel demand in urban areas Based on 1990 NPTS data Provides detailed travel demand characteristics for weekdays Update information using 2001 NHTS and supplement weekday information with weekend data

2001 NHTS: Sample Characteristics Characteristic Households Persons Hhld Size Auto Ownership # Drivers % Sngl Fam DU % $25K-$55K % MSA > 1 mil % Zero Travel Weekday 14,470 (60.6 mil) 32,917 (153.9 mil) 2.52 1.79 1.73 60.3% 35.5% 66% 5.8% Weekend 5,318 (24.8 mil) 12,262 (63.3 mil) 2.56 1.84 1.75 60.8% 36.0% 65% 8.4%

2001 NHTS: Sample Characteristics Characteristic Age in years % Female % Coll Degree % Worker Weekday 35.3 51.3% 32.8% 52.8% Weekend 35.3 51.3% 31.8% 52.3%

Household and Person Trip Rates 10 9 8 Weekday Weekend 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Prsn Trips/Hhld Veh Trips/Hhld Prsn Trips/Male Prsn Trips/Female Veh Trips/Male Veh Trips/Female

Distribution of Person Trips by Purpose 35 30 Weekday Weekend Percent of Trips 25 20 15 10 5 0 HBW HBShop HBSoc HBOther NHB

Average Trip Length by Purpose Trip Miles (Length) and Minutes (Duration 25 20 15 10 5 0 Weekday Trip Length Weekend Trip Length Weekday Trip Duration Weekend Trip Duration HBW HBShop HBSoc HBOther NHB

Daily VMT/PMT/PTT by Purpose Daily Miles or Minutes 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Weekday Hhld VMT Weekend Hhld VMT Weekday Prsn PMT Weekend Prsn PMT Weekday Prsn PTT Weekend Prsn PTT HBW HBShop HBSoc HBOther NHB All

Daily VMT/PMT/PTT by Gender 35 30 Weekday Weekend 25 Daily Miles 20 15 10 5 0 Male VMT Female VMT Male PMT Female PMT

Mode Split: MSA Size 1-3 million Percent of Trips 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Weekday HBW Weekend HBW Weekday All Weekend All 0 SOV HOV Bus/LRT Metro/Hvy Rail Com Rail Walk Bicycle

Mode Split: MSA Size 3 mil w/hvy Rail Percent of Trips 70 60 50 40 30 20 Weekday HBW Weekend HBW Weekday All Weekend All 10 0 SOV HOV Bus/LRT Metro/Hvy Rail Com Rail Walk Bicycle

Average Vehicle Occupancy by Purpose Average Vehicle Occupancy 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Weekday Weekend 0 HBW HBShop HBSoc HBOther NHB All

Time of Day Distribution of Trips 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Weekday HBW Weekend HBW Weekday All Weekend All 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM Percent of Trips 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM

9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM Time of Day Distribution of Trips 10 9 8 7 Weekday Male Weekend Male Weekday Female Weekend Female 6 5 4 Percent of Trips 3 2 1 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 0

Daily Activity and Travel Durations (min) Category Subsistence Maintenance Recreational Social Weekday Activity Travel 289 20 64 26 15 4 32 5 Weekend Activity Travel 71 5 88 29 19 5 93 13.5

Weekend Travel Demand Weekend travel behavior characterized by: Larger amounts of non-work travel Longer trip lengths, but shorter trip durations Lower levels of daily VMT and PMT Substantially lower SOV and higher HOV mode shares (higher auto occupancy rates) Flat and wide midday peak in temporal distribution Noticeable differences between weekday and weekend travel

Conclusions NHTS is a powerful resource for analyzing/ modeling weekend travel demand Special considerations for weekend travel modeling: Time of day distribution Auto occupancy joint trip making Activity type choice Location choice Activity duration to travel duration ratio Explore trip chaining patterns in detail

Implications Development of parallel stream of weekend activity-travel models Interdependency between weekday and weekend activity and travel engagement Towards models of weekly (or multiday) activity-travel behavior Consideration for making NHTS a multiday travel survey weekend and weekday data

Policy Considerations Land use transport infrastructure, travel choices, and public health Social and recreational activity engagement higher on weekends; greater scope for active living Examine auto dependency on weekends Equity/access considerations access to jobs Weekend travel greater proportion that offers positive utility? Congestion mitigation in non-work locations