I 35 Xpress Bus on Shoulder

Similar documents
TRB Managed Lanes Conference May 22 24, 2012, Oakland, CA

A Federal Perspective on Congestion Pricing. Wayne Berman Federal Highway Administration July 8, 2010

95 Express Annual Operations Report: Fiscal Year

K-10 in Douglas and Johnson Counties

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

Bus Queue Jump (Lane) Utilization: A case study in Calgary, AB Canada Muhammad Asim P.Eng, M.Sc. The City of Calgary

1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Short-Term Enhancements Improvements to keep Austin moving. MetroRapid

2.2 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Emphasize transit priority solutions STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Welcome. Wilmington Transit Moving Forward Workshop Presentation. October 16, 2013

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

Congestion Management Report

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Part-time Shoulder Use Guide

Purpose + Need. Connect: Thrive: Develop: < Strengthen the spine of our regional transportation system

the Story of the 30s & 70s Bus Lines James Hamre - WMATA

Part-time Shoulder Use Guide

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Service Proposal for the City of Ashland, Oregon

Preliminary Review of the T-REX Southeast Corridor Highway and Light Rail Transit Project

METRO Now. Transit Leader. One of only four urban. gain bus ridership in Purple and Green Lines. Red Line is one

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Crystal City Potomac Yard Transitway. Enforcement Ordinance & Construction Update

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

I-405/SR 167 Corridor Executive Advisory Group

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Transportation 2040 Update: Eudora Public Input As of June 1, 2017

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Interim Transit Ridership Forecast Results Technical Memorandum

Occ c u c pa p n a t pro r t O ec e t c i t O i n

Roadways. Roadways III.

I-95 NEW HAVEN HARBOR CROSSING CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

Peterborough Council on Aging

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Central Jersey Transportation Forum. March 2007

I-95 NEW HAVEN HARBOR CROSSING CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Transportation Element

In Collaboration with: City of Belton Cass County FHWA Johnson County KDOT MoDOT City of Olathe City of Overland Park

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

ALTERNATIVES TO BE CONSIDERED

FY 2018 I-66 Commuter Choice Program Presentation to the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission May 3,

MnPASS System Today and the Future

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

5. MODIFICATIONS AT JEANNE D ARC BOULEVARD/REGIONAL ROAD 174 INTERCHANGE INTERSECTION - PUBLIC HEARING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

ROUTE 11 Downtown to KU to 31 st and Iowa SERVICE DESIGN

ECONOMY PEOPLE ENVIRONMENT

Transit Choices December 8, 2016

Overview of 64 Express Lanes. Secretary of Transportation Aubrey Layne April 12, 2017

395 Express Lanes Extension

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Enhancing Return on Investment for MnPASS Express Lanes

Project Mobility - Route 3 South Express Toll Lanes. Industry Day Overview

Strategies to keep people and goods moving in and through Seattle

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Meeting Schedule 7:00-7:15 Open House 7:15-7:45 Existing Conditions/Short-Term Improvements Study Presentation 7:45-8:00 Q&A Session 8:00-8:10

Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

GIVING GEORGIANS A CHOICE TO KEEP MOVING

The I-85 Express Lanes Project NASCIO Recognition Award Nomination

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

Summary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

A127/A130 Fairglen Interchange Improvement Schemes. Information Leaflet February 2017

Transit Ridership - Why the Decline and How to Increase. Hosted by the. Virginia Transit Association

Purpose and Need Report. Appendix B. Purpose and Need Report

Bus on Shoulder Systems (BOSS) North Carolina Implementation and Operations Plan (IOP)

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

As Amended by Senate Committee. [As Amended by House Committee of the Whole] As Amended by House Committee. HOUSE BILL No. 2192

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Transportation Authority of Marin Renew Existing ½-cent Transportation Sales Tax

Transcription:

I 35 Xpress Bus on Shoulder January 24, 2013 Kansas Senate Standing Committee on Transportation Getting you there is our BUSiness! www.thejo.com 1 About Johnson County Transit The JO: 15 fixed routes operating in Johnson County and throughout KC Metro Daily Ridership: 2,200 in FY 2012 (2,800 on peak days) FY 2012 ridership was 8.3% higher than FY 2011 and 22% higher than FY 2010 JCT also operates Special Edition and Sheltered Workshop Industrial Fixed Transportation (SWIFT) JCT Ridership FY 2002 to FY 2012 2 Committee on Transportation 1

Bus on Shoulder Background I 35 Commuter Rail MARC SmartMoves Plan I 35 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis I 35 Bus on Shoulders Study Phase I I 35 Bus on Shoulders Study Phase II Early Implementation Project 3 Approval and Implementation Conclusion: BOS can be used safely and effectively on I 35. Successful implementation in other regions. Generally between 95 th Street and state line some segments have a six month evaluation period Shoulder modifications: Relocate guardrail Add signage and pavement markings Replace drainage inlets Travel time savings and improvement in reliability. 4 Committee on Transportation 2

Legislative Approval House Bill No. 2561 was passed in 2010 to allow transit buses to operate on certain right shoulders; amending K.S.A. 8 1517. Components of the bill include: The secretary of transportation may authorize transit buses to be operated upon the right shoulders of city connecting links and other highways in the state highway system in Johnson county. Only if the speed of traffic on such connecting link or highway has been reduced to less than 35 miles per hour. Drivers of transit buses being operated upon the shoulder shall: Not exceed the traffic speed by more than 10 miles per hour; and Yield to merging, entering and exiting traffic and to other vehicles on the shoulder. Annually, report to the legislature concerning the implementation and operation of the program. Sec. 2. K.S.A. 8 1517 was amended to include (3) below: (a) The driver of a vehicle may overtake and pass upon the right of another vehicle only under the following conditions: (3) a transit bus authorized under and being operated in accordance with the provisions of section 1, and amendments thereto. 5 Operational Details Uses shoulders during peak periods when traffic is moving slower than 35 mph. Buses using shoulders do not travel more than 35 mph. Buses do not travel more than 10 mph above traffic. Buses must yield to any vehicle entering, merging or exiting through the shoulder. Buses must re enter the mainline where the shoulder is obstructed (vehicle debris, incident, etc). BoS in Minneapolis 6 Committee on Transportation 3

Four commuter express routes that are allowed to use the shoulders of I 35 to bypass traffic under specific conditions: Route 661/B Olathe Xpress Route 670/L Gardner OP Xpress Route 673/N South OP Xpress Route 678/S Shawnee Xpress The JO Xpress The launch of BoS is the result of years of planning and regional coordination, involving: Johnson County Transit (JCT) Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) Kansas Highway Patrol (KHP) Mid America Regional Council (MARC) Support from various Johnson County municipalities 7 Public Education & Marketing Activities to explain and promote BoS (October 2011 January 2012): Focus groups to help fine tune message Radio advertisements Local presentations Local news coverage Outreach to current riders Marketing videos to explain and promote service High visibility of test run and driver training sessions KC Scout message boards Media Day at JCT Since implementation, public response has generally been positive: Most frequent comment: Why aren t drivers using the shoulders more? or Why does my bus not use the shoulder? 8 Committee on Transportation 4

BoS Operations In the first year of operation (2012): Atotal of 472 buses used the shoulders of I 35, travelling approximately 1,348 miles on the shoulder. All four Xpress routes have used the shoulder, and shoulder use increased dramatically since beginning the service. No BoS related safety incidents have been reported. Shoulder Use by Route FY 2012 Shoulder Use by Segment FY 2012 Segment Southbound Northbound I 635 to Lamar 99 57 Antioch to I 635 126 66 Johnson to Antioch 192 57 67th to Johnson 252 37 75th to 67th 222 38 US 69 to 75th 108 25 87th to US 69 24 13 95th to 87th 14 1 Total 1037 294 Ridership Xpress ridership in FY 2012 increased by 10.4 percent compared to FY 2011, compared to 8.3 percent for The JO system as a whole. Xpress Ridership by Route FY 2012 Route FY 2011 FY 2012 % Change 661/B Olathe Xpress 68,112 71,064 4.3% 670/L Gardner OP Xpress 38,556 44,862 16.4% 671/LN * 2,164 0 100.0% 673/N South OP Xpress 29,733 39,126 31.6% 678/S Shawnee Xpress 18,040 17,867 1.0% Xpress Total 156,605 172,919 10.4% The JO Other Routes 362,916 389,471 7.3% The JO Total (includes Xpress) 519,521 562,390 8.3% * 671/LN was eliminated at the end of FY 2011, with trips added to 670/L and 673/N 10 Committee on Transportation 5

Travel Time Savings An estimated 2.5 minutes are saved each time a bus is able to use the shoulder for at least a two mile segment (approx. 10% of travel time). This travel time savings is limited due to the relatively short segment where BoS is allowed (8 miles) and speed restrictions (10 mph speed differential). Buses using the shoulder are better able to maintain schedules and reduce late arrivals. Schedule and routing adjustments to Xpress routes in downtown Kansas City have also saved an additional four to six minutes on each trip. 11 The JO Xpress Transit Stations Enhanced transit stations at the following Park & Ride locations: Strang Line Park & Ride (Heartland Church) Great Mall Park & Ride Sheridan & Kenwood Park & Ride (Mid America Nazarene University) 137 th & Antioch Park & Ride (Palazzo 16 Theatre) 151 st & Antioch Park & Ride (Blue Valley Baptist Church) 12 Committee on Transportation 6

The JO Xpress Transit Stations Construction Photos Dec. 2012 & Jan. 2013 13 Lessons Learned An extensive public outreach effort and a coordinated message helped the public understand the service. Explain project goals and expectations in order to build public support. Learn from other regions that have implemented BoS service. Driver training is critical to achieving safe and effective implementation. Buy in and assistance from project partners is essential; KDOT and KHP provided crucial training assistance. Create and improve processes for debris removal. 14 Committee on Transportation 7

Long Term Implementation Minneapolis Kansas City To Lawrence K 10 151 st St. 135 th St. Existing BoS Southbound Existing BoS Northbound Potential BoS Based on current service 15 BoS: Long Term Implementation I 35: Lamar to Cambridge Circle (State Line) in Wyandotte County Improvements have been designed but no legislative approval Will provide the largest potential for travel time savings and be used by the most routes I 35: 151 st Street to 95 th Street U.S. 69: 135 th Street to I 35 merger (87 th Street) K 10 / I 435: west of Quivira to Lawrence, served by the popular K 10 Connector route. 16 Committee on Transportation 8

K 10 Connector Commuter express service connecting the University of Kansas in Lawrence to Johnson County Community College and KU Edwards in Overland Park All day service Monday Friday 30 minute frequency during peak hours 60 minute frequency in midday and evening Reduced schedules in summer and school breaks Provided 162,000 passenger trips in FY 2012 1,200 passengers on peak days (Aug Sept) K 10 Connector Annual Ridership 17 K 10 Connector November 2012 passenger survey found that: 78% of trips are for school, 16% for work, 6% for social/recreation/other 54% live in Douglas County, 39% live in Johnson County, 7% other Bus on Shoulder on K 10 Highway would improve service reliability due to traffic congestion or incidents. 264 total responses 18 Committee on Transportation 9

Questions & Comments Getting you there is our BUSiness! www.thejo.com 19 Committee on Transportation 10