Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside Program. June 28, 2017

Similar documents
Transportation Enhancements, Safe Routes to School, and Recreational Trails to Transportation Alternatives. Pamela Liston, October 30 th, 2013

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator


PennDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Initiatives. Jonathan Heilman Roy Gothie Angela Watson

The Role of MPOs in Advancing Safe Routes to School through the Transportation Alternatives Program

Eastern PA Trail Summit October 1, 2018

Council July 2013 WILMAPCO. Draft TAP Prioritization: FY 14 Cecil Projects. Highway 301 Stream Restoration

Complete Streets Workshop Follow-up. April 27, 2011 Rockledge City Hall

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Funding Sources Appendix I. Appendix I. Funding Sources. Virginia Beach Bikeways and Trails Plan 2011 Page I-1

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

Linking Transportation and Health in Nashville & Middle Tennessee

Smart Growth Transportation Funding Forum April 9, 2015

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

TULSA CITY COUNCIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside FY2018 Applicant Workshop

Click to edit Master title style

Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Transportation Alternatives Program. FY2017 Applicant Workshop

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

FUNDING SOURCES CHAPTER 6

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

Complete Streets implementation in Chicagoland

The New Federal Transportation Law: What s the Impact on Safe Routes to School?

TxDOT Bicycle Tourism Trails Study Update. April 2017 BAC Meeting April 10, 2017

AIRPORT ROAD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Roosevelt Estates Neighborhood Improvements

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Palm Beach MPO Complete Streets Working Group

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

APPENDIX B: FUNDING MATRIX

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

» Draft Recommendations» Discussion» Next Steps. Plan for Walking and Biking

Prioritizing Transportation Policy and Funding for Active Transportation, Safety, Equity and Health

Paoli Road Improvement Feasibility Study

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

FY 2015 Transportation Alternatives Program

GEARY CORRIDOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT Environmental Analysis. Special Intersections: Preliminary Concepts

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION HEARING

Living Streets Policy

2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle and Safe Routes to School Application for Funding Page 1 of 31

CITY OF SEATTLE RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) led the Seattle

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES SET-ASIDE PROGRAM

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Mayor s Bicycle Advisory Council. Wednesday, December 13 th, 2017

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

Introduction.

Pennsylvania Highway Statistics

Section 8. Partnerships and Funding

and Rural Multimodal Networks 2017 ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan Update

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

IMPLEMENTATION CHAPTER Identifying Priorities 7.2 Maintenance 7.3 Funding 7.4 Education and Enforcement IMPLEMENTATION

Draft MOBILITY ELEMENET. Community Meeting May 22, 2013

Transit-Driven Complete Streets

FAYETTE COUNTY. Fayette County Active Transportation Profile REGIONAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA

Long Range Transportation Plan and Bicycle Mobility Plan

TYPE QUESTIONS INTO THE Q&A BOX. Q&A Box

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Planning & HIA. Anna Ricklin, MHS. Manager, Planning & Community Health Research Center


CML s 91 st Annual Conference June 18 21, 2013 Vail, Colorado. Why a Campaign? Learn More. City of Brush! 6/13/2013

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

Golden s Plan. For the Highway 6 & 93 Corridor

San Jose Transportation Policy

Pinellas County Safety Initiatives

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Major Bike Routes 102 Avenue Workshop April 21, 2015

Casablanca Boulevard & GO Station Access

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Beyond First First Last Last Mile Strategies. APA National Conference April 3, 2016 Chelsea Richer, AICP Fehr & Peers

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

East Burke Transportation, Safety and Capacity Improvements

City of Madison: 2017 Capital Budget Capital Improvement Plan

to the Public Information Centre for the Downtown Traffic Study

City of SeaTac 2013 Joint APA-PAW Awards Program Nomination Draft Safe & Complete Streets Plan. Transportation Category

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

Walkability Audit Cities of Olympia, Tumwater and Lacey, Washington. Next Steps Memorandum September FINAL

Municipal Class EA To Address Traffic Congestion On The Ontario Street Corridor (Grand Bend) Public Information Meeting June 4, 2018

Proposed Bicycle Ambassador Program. Transportation Enhancement Funding Application

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Fairlington Citizens Association September 12, 2016

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Executive Summary Leadership Cincinnati Class 34. Project: Cinci Bikes

Walking the Walk in Montgomery County, PA

Engineering - Bicycle and Pedestrian

Transcription:

Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside Program June 28, 2017

What is Transportation Alternatives Set- Aside Program (TASA)? Enhancement program (combined separated programs; old TAP) Not a grant program (no dollar match required) Pre-construction cost to project sponsor/owner Program funds construction costs only (shovel ready) Competitive selection process

Funding

How Much Funding Is Available? $13 million statewide (FFY 2018) $55M over 3-yrs Anticipated that Commonwealth will award all 3-yrs of funding this round $661,000 in Lehigh Valley (FFY 2018) $1.98M over 3-yrs Anticipated that LVTS will award 2- years of funding this round All awards anticipated in early 2018

Is My Project Eligible? Funding minimum = $50,000 Funding maximum = $1 Million but, Soft Cap Exceptional Value Exception to $1 million Soft Cap Closes a major transportation gap Addresses a significant safety concern Benefits a substantial # of users Provides another substantial benefit

Is My Organization Eligible? Local Governments Regional Transportation Authorities Transit Agencies Natural Resource or Public Land Agencies School Districts, Education Agencies, Schools Non-Profits

Is My Organization Eligible? Non-Profit Entities Qualifier: Must be responsible for the administration of local transportation safety programs

Is My Organization Eligible? Regional Transportation Authorities Qualifier: County Recreational Trails Authorities County Recreational Authorities Urban Redevelopment Authorities Municipal Authorities only if establishing document specifically cites transportation or recreation as a stated purpose. Industrial development authorities, for instance, would not be eligible.

What Projects Are Eligible? Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Bicycle and Pedestrian Education (K-8) Conversion of Abandoned Railway Corridors to Trails Construction of Turnouts, Overlooks, and Viewing Areas Historic Preservation and Rehab of Historic Transportation Facilities Archaeological Activities Safe Routes to School Outdoor Advertising Management Vegetation Management Stormwater Management Wildlife Mortality Mitigation Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Bicycle and Pedestrian Education (K-8) Conversion of Abandoned Railway Corridors to Trails Construction of Turnouts, Overlooks, and Viewing Areas Historic Preservation and Rehab of Historic Transportation Facilities Archaeological Activities Safe Routes to School

Project Eligibility Pre-Application Pre-Application Eligibility Determinations Due by August 25, 2017 For projects not clearly eligible Determination within one week of submission All projects will be reviewed for eligibility after submission

Project Eligibility Pre-Application Project Sponsors MUST meet with staff from the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission and PENNDOT District 5-0 Meetings are anticipated to be scheduled in August 2017 Program attendees will be contacted to assess potential project(s) and set-up a meeting time

Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside (TASA)

Statewide Webinar for Project Sponsors July 13, 2017 @ 1 PM Audio component Bridge # 717-612-4733 Toll-free # 855-750-1027 PIN # 069617 Visual component URL excluding Apple and Mobile Devices: https://openspacewebconf.pa.gov/client/fastclient_i_r137568ef.exe URL including Apple and Mobile Devices: https://openspacewebconfw1.pa.gov/joinclient.aspx?inv=r137568ef

Scope and Deliverables Be Specific and Clear Project Limits Right-of-Way requirements Environmental Resources Fit the project into its surrounds (context) Highlight Deliverables Focus on projects that can go to construction within 2-years

Project Scoring Statewide or Regional Significance Integration of Land Use & transportation Decision Making Collaboration with Stakeholders & Cross Jurisdictional Partnerships PENNDOT Connects Safety Readiness for Implementation/Deliverablity Leverage of Other Projects Consistency with Regional Plans Consistency with Statewide Plans Consistency with Local Plans Reasonableness of Cost Teachability & Transferability Success Factor Environmental Justice/Entitlement Communities Innovation/Design (especially environmental and transportation goals)

Justifiably Deliverable Multi-Jurisdictional Partnerships (Stakeholders) Enhances Mobility Supports Environmental Justice Communities Long Range Transportation Plan & Comprehensive Plan Goals/Policies Consistency Integration of Multiple Concepts (e.g. Road Diet with Safe RoutesToSchool) Transferable -TASA Review Criteria- Integration of Land Use and Community Context Cost Reasonable Safety Focused

Mobility and Accessibility Traffic Calming and Street Design Transit Oriented Design Modern Roundabouts Walkable Neighborhoods Complete Streets Safe Routes To School Road Diets

Designed for people of ALL ages and physical abilities whether they walk, bicycle, ride transit or drive Integrates all modes of travel; pedestrian, bicycle, transit and other vehicles Integrate connectivity and traffic calming with pedestrian-oriented site design to create safe and inviting places Integrates the existing character of a community, especially historic architecture, building orientation, street walls and other urban design aspects of a place Integrates green infrastructure Reflects the diversity and cultures of place

PennDOT Contacts For questions related to the Electronic Construction Management System (ECMS); reimbursement agreements; consultant selection, project design and inspection; right-of-way clearance; utility clearance; environmental clearances, securing of permits; progress monitoring; utility clearances, scope changes, etc. Scott Vottero, P.E. Project Development Engineer PA Department of Transportation Engineering District 5-0 1002 Hamilton Street Allentown PA 18101 Phone: 610.871.4550 Fax: 610.871.4124 svottero@pa.gov www.dot.state.pa.us Chris Metka Transportation Alternatives Coordinator PA Department of Transportation Center for Program Development and Management 400 North Street, 6 th Floor Harrisburg PA 17120 Phone: 717.787.8065 Fax: 717.787.5247 cmetka@pa.gov www.dot.state.pa.us

LVPC Contacts For questions related to project design, plan consistency, mobility mix, etc. George Kinney, AICP Director of Transportation Planning Lehigh Valley Planning Commission 961 Marcon Boulevard Allentown PA 18109 Phone: 610.264.4544 gkinney@lvpc.org www.lvpc.org Mike Donchez Senior Transportation Planner Lehigh Valley Planning Commission 961 Marcon Boulevard Allentown PA 18109 Phone: 610.264.4544 mdonchez@lvpc.org www.lvpc.org

Q: How Many Applications? A: Single application is used to compete for both regional and statewide funding Q: Where Do I Get the Application? A: https://spportal.dot.pa.gov/planning/appreg/tap/pages/default.aspx Q: Where Do I Submit the Application? A: https://spportal.dot.pa.gov/planning/appreg/tap/pages/default.aspx

LVPC Resource Center TASA Application Link Program Guidance Link Power Point Presentation LRTP/Comprehensive Plan Link Before Photos Once Project is Selected http://lvpc.org/tasa.html