A. Arlington County Master Transportation Plan Pedestrian Element B. Arlington County Horizontal Standards H-3.1 Driveway Entrances

Similar documents
ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

Off-road Trails. Guidance

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT ROUNDABOUTS

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

Classification Criteria

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Footpath design. A guide to creating footpaths that are safe, comfortable, and easy to use

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

ADA PRESENTATION (CURB RAMPS)

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation Guideline Development

What Is a Complete Street?

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors


County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT

CURB EXTENSIONS BULB OUTS DPS 201 NECKDOWNS

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK. CROSSING TYPES

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

GENERAL. 1. Description

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT INTERCHANGES

ADA & Public Rights of Way

Department of Public Works Office of Disability Affairs February 23, 2017 Presented by Mark Zwoyer, PE

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 3 Curb Ramps & Blended Transitions

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

ADA on Construction. Guidance for Section C Plan Preparers

Small Area Study U.S. Route 220 and VA Route 615 Intersection. Bath County, Virginia

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

Considerations in the Review and Approval of a Driveway in Your Jurisdiction

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Design Overview. Section 4 Standard Plans for Design. Pedestrian Access Routes. Pedestrian Access Routes. Overview. Cross Slope

DRAFT. A fifth objective, other considerations, has been added to capture considerations not captured by the four primary objectives.

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Traffic Calming SECTION 1, CHAPTER Introduction What is Traffic Calming?

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

Raymond Avenue: Rightsizing Improved Safety and Pedestrian Experience

UDC Street Cross Sections

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

DRAFT Montgomery County Bicycle Master Plan Design Toolkit

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

Pedestrian Safety at Interchanges

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Military Road Safety Improvements

Road Diets FDOT Process

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Standards vs. Guidelines. Public Right-of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Public Information Centre

4.1 CONTEXT. The existing terrain and sight conditions will affect available sight lines and approach speeds of bicyclists and motorists.

FOCUS AREA 1 - Alberta Avenue Pocket Park 3 (121 Ave and 92 St)

RIVERSIDE DRIVE: 21st to 41st

ADA Training Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) 2018 MnDOT

Transcription:

GENERAL 1. Description This standard identifies minimum requirements that shall be met for all accessible ramps in the design and construction of elements for Arlington County Horizontal Design Standards. The development of this standard is to provide greater guidance in the design and construction of accessible ramps while meeting the County s guiding principles for increasing pedestrian safety and accessibility, decreasing county infrastructure costs and decreasing impervious surface area. 2. Related Arlington County Standards A. Arlington County Master Transportation Plan Pedestrian Element B. Arlington County Horizontal Standards H-3.1 Driveway Entrances 3. Applicable Standards and Specifications A. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) B. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Road and Bridge Standards. C. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 4. Quality Assurance A. Reserved 5. Submittals A. All ramp designs and placements shall be approved by DES Transportation Engineering and Operations Bureau (TE&O). 1

DESIGN CONSIDERATION A. Purpose of Curb Ramps Increase Mobility Convenience Visual and Tactile queue for crossing B. Intersection Configurations The following is a list of intersection configurations that may be encountered within the county based on current street categories. Intersection Configuration Street Category Arterial Arterial Arterial Neighborhood Principal Arterial Neighborhood Minor Neighborhood Principal Neighborhood Principal Neighborhood Principal Neighborhood Minor Neighborhood Minor Neighborhood Minor All Alleys C. Ramp Placement The default placement for Curb Ramps within the county is 2 ramps per corner. The exception to this is intersection configurations involving Alleys, where a county approved driveway apron shall be installed. 2

Figure 1.1 Default CG-12A Placement of Curb Ramps for Typical Intersection Configuration D. Ramp Type The default type of curb ramp be used within the county shall be the CG-12A. However due to ROW, topography and landscaping restrictions the CG-12B or CG- 12C ramps are most likely to be installed on Neighborhood Minor streets. In cases where an intersection configuration involves an alley a county approved driveway apron shall be installed. However some cases may require the installation of a curb ramp rather than a driveway apron. 3

Typical Ramp Types 1. CG-12A (VDOT standard) 2. CG-12B (VDOT standard) 3. CG-12C (VDOT standard) 4. CG-12A MOD1 (w/ 3ft wings) 5. CG-12A MOD2 (w/ header curb) 6. Directional MOD3 Figure 1.2 Alternative Placement and Ramp Types for Typical Intersection Configuration with 25 Radius or greater 4

Figure 1.3 Alternative Placement and Ramp Types for Typical Intersection Configuration with 20 Radius or less E. Other Considerations 1. Street Characteristics a. Street Channelization The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by traffic islands or pavement marking to facilitate the orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. b. Intersection Geometry Intersections are defined as where two or more public streets meet. Intersections are characterized by a high level of activity and shared use, multi-modal conflicts, complex movements and special 5

design treatments. The angle and width of intersections curb returns and traffic circles and roundabouts are also considered to be part of the intersection geometry. i. Slip Lane for Right turns Requires visibility to be given greatest importance in deciding ramp design and placement. The designer may have reduced flexibility with other design considerations. ii. Traffic Turning Movements Requires visibility and crossing distance to be given greatest importance in deciding ramp design and placement. Ramp types and placement may be affected due to high turning traffic. iii. Curb Return Radius - The standard curb return radius is 15 feet with larger radii used when necessary to accommodate the low-speed turning movement of expected truck and bus traffic. Curb radii at corners can affect the crossing distances of pedestrians, the approach speeds of turning vehicles and the alignment of ramps with their crosswalks. iv. Intersecting Street Angles intersecting angles other than 90 degrees may impact the placement of 2 ramps and type and cause crossing distances to be disproportionally longer and impact visibility. c. Street Topography and Drainage i. Placement may be impacted by existing catch basins ii. Placement and ramp type may be impacted due to drainage requirements to reduce ponding at foot of ramps. iii. Use of curb extensions provide opportunity to reduce grades iv. New Catch basins shall be placed up stream of curb ramps where possible to minimize water flow and ponding at the base of the ramps. d. Sidewalk Width Wide sidewalks may indicate higher pedestrian volumes and may warrant consideration for wider than standard ramps. e. Traffic Calming Traffic calming involves a combination of mainly physical measures to improve safety and livability of streets by (1) reducing the negative effects of vehicle use, including excessive vehicle speed and excessive traffic volume by altering driver behavior, and (2) addressing other safety-related traffic concerns. 6

2. Pedestrian Continuity a. Sidewalks i. Offsets - is the distance between the centerline of a sidewalk with the centerline of its corresponding crosswalk. Large offsets create inconvenience and induce delays for pedestrians. In such situations, pedestrians tend to disregard crosswalk locations, making them less conspicuous to drivers. Therefore Offsets should be minimized. i. Landing Areas landing areas and sidewalk width behind ramps provide areas for pedestrians to wait, maneuver, or by-pass the ramp. Therefore consideration shall be given to providing wider sidewalks where needed to provide space for those uses. ii. Crosswalks at Intersections may be marked or unmarked. Crosswalks not at intersections do not exist unless they are marked. Crosswalks identify to pedestrians and vehicle operators the appropriate place for pedestrian crossings. 1.1 That part of the roadway at an intersection included within the connections of the lateral lines of the sidewalks on opposite sides of the street, or in the absence of sidewalks the most direct pedestrian path, measured from the curbs or, in the absence of curbs, from the edges of the traversable roadway. Crosswalks at these locations may be marked or unmarked. 1.2 Any portion of a roadway at an intersection or elsewhere distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface. The standard width of a crosswalk within the County is 10 feet. In high pedestrian areas with wide sidewalks, crosswalks may be up to 20 feet wide. In general, the width should be adjusted to fit the scale of the intersection and vehicle speeds and to serve the peak pedestrian volumes that use the crossing. iii. Ramps - should be oriented to minimize crossing distances, enhance safety and visibility while also aligning as much as possible with the expected walking path. All new ramps installed shall have receiving ramps on the other side of the street that meet current ADA requirements. iv. Pedestrian Desire Lines The route the pedestrian will usually choose is to take the shortest distance between 2 points. Pedestrian facilities should align with those desire lines providing safety is not compromised. 7

3. Street Volumes a. Vehicle Volumes Streets with low traffic volumes allow for flexibility with ramp type and placement. b. Sidewalk Use High Pedestrian or bike volumes may require wider ramp widths. Higher bicycle use will require wider ramp widths. 4. Safety a. Pedestrian Crossing Distance - Pedestrian Crossing Distance is the distance between the base of pedestrian ramps on opposite sides of a crosswalk. In the absence of ramps this distance is measured between the face of curb on opposite sides of the street centered on the crosswalk. In the absence of ramps or crosswalk markings, this distance is measured between the face of curb on opposite sides of the street centered on each sidewalk extended to the curb. By minimizing the crossing distance the pedestrian exposure to traffic is also minimized. b. Cross Walk per ADA requirements, ramps must fall within the boundary of a crosswalk. Crosswalks may be marked or unmarked. c. Visibility The visibility of and by pedestrians is of great importance in deciding ramp design and placement. The designer may have reduced flexibility with other design considerations to ensure this requirement is met. d. Traffic Controls- traffic control devices are used to ensure the safe and efficient transportation of people in all modes of travel. Use of national standards and industry practices ensure uniformity of traffic control devices and increases compliance and safety. i. Signalization intersections- The placement of ramps needs to be coordinated with placement of signal poles, signs and markings. Due to the installation of signalization the designer may have greater flexibility with certain design considerations such as crossing distance. ii. Un-signalized Intersection 1.1 Stop controlled approaches Due to the installation of stop controls the designer may have less flexibility than at signalized intersections and greater flexibility than at uncontrolled approaches with certain design considerations. 8

1.2 Yield controlled and uncontrolled approaches Require visibility and crossing distance to be given greatest importance in deciding ramp design and placement. Due to the use of yield controls and uncontrolled approaches the designer may have reduced flexibility with other design considerations. 5. Obstructions and Restrictions a. ROW Availability refers to both the publicly owned land platted for street rights-of-way and any easements available on adjacent property(ies) which would allow for the installation and maintenance of sidewalk, street, and/or utilities. When the ROW is insufficient to enable a preferred design, acquisition of easement(s) may be pursued, but if the adjacent property(ies) are not inclined to grant easement(s) for the project, an alternate design which does not exceed the ROW availability must be implemented. Generally designs should be constrained to the available ROW. b. Utilities Existing and Proposed Utilities may include overhead (1) utility poles; (2) traffic control facilities (poles, junction boxes, and cabinets); and (3) underground utility vaults, manholes (to include catch basins), and appurtenances (valves, fire hydrants, etc). Relocation of existing utilities is often expensive whether county owned or private and can require long periods of time, so the design should balance preferred ramp placement and style with the expected cost and delay of required utility relocations. Proposed utilities should be located so as to not interfere with the pedestrian pathway. c. Landscaping Existing and Proposed Existing landscaping such as significant trees or landscaping with significant public value and of a size and maturity that they could not be relocated or replaced should be considered and accommodated in design of ramps. Significant trees will frequently have roots that extend far beyond the base of the tree, so ramp placement and style should be sensitive to the potential impacts of construction upon such root mass. Proposed landscaping should be positioned to not interfere with the optimal pedestrian path design. i. Walls and Fences Fences which are in the public right-of-way should be relocated if they conflict with the preferred design for curb ramps. Walls within the available right-of-way which conflict with preferred ramp design may bear significant cost or risk to adjacent properties to relocate. The design of any ramp which is affected by an existing wall should balance the optimal ramp placement and style with the expected cost of relocating the wall. 9

PLACEMENT d. Topography Where topography is severe enough that preferred ramp placement would necessitate construction of a wall, the design of the ramp should balance the expected cost of construction of a wall with the required compromise(s) in optimal ramp design. 6. Community Desires a. Context Encompasses a broad spectrum of environmental, social, economic and historical aspects of a community and its people. All of these aspects are important and context can include the natural or built environment created by the land, topography, natural features, buildings and associated features, land use types, and activities on property adjacent to streets and on sidewalks and a broader area created by the surrounding neighborhood, district, or community. In both environments, context can reflect historic or other protected resources. An urban thoroughfare will often pass through both built and natural environments as it changes from one context zone to another. Context also refers to the diversity of users of the environment. b. Aesthetics - The redesign of thoroughfares creates opportunities for the implementation of enhanced design features as part of an urban design or streetscape plan. Aesthetics provide the opportunity to identify a district or contribute to a determined or desired design theme. 7. County Goals and Policies - Establish pedestrian equity by serving the mobility and accessibility needs of all residents regardless of age, income or ability. Ensure transportation facilities and County infrastructure, whether new or existing, meet ADA, preferably through universal design. The following lists the Design Considerations that are considered a priority for intersecting streets of varying categories A. Arterial Arterial Intersection Most often Arterial Arterial intersections are signalized 1. Safety a. Traffic Control i. Signalization the placement of ramps needs to be considered in conjunction with the following: 1.1 pedestrian visibility and accessibility (particularly for turning movements) 1.2 pedestrian cone of vision to the pedestrian crossing signal head, 1.3 timing of the pedestrian crossing signal, 10

1.4 location of pedestrian actuation ii. Stop Control 1.1 pedestrian visibility (particularly for turning movements) 1.2 pedestrian crossing distance b. Pedestrian Safety i. Pedestrian Crossing Distance this distance needs to be minimized where possible to ensure the greatest degree of safety for pedestrians. At signalized intersections this distance is less critical and is mitigated through the ability to control signal timing. At skewed intersections the shortest crossing distance does not necessarily result in the best pedestrian crossing location. ii. Visibility of and by Pedestrians The crossing distance and visibility of pedestrians especially with turning traffic is highly inter-related. 2. Street Characteristics a. Street Channelization the placement of ramps needs to be considered in conjunction with the following: i. alignment of crosswalks, ii. number of traffic lanes, including turning lanes iii. presence and size of median islands both raised and surface panted, iv. presence of raised channelization, v. conflicts between pedestrian walkways and raised channelization 3. Pedestrian Continuity a. Desire Lines i. On arterial streets the pedestrian desire line may be farther removed from the intersection due to the presence of obstructions within the sidewalk and this may conflict with the goal of pedestrian visibility and safety. 4. Obstructions and Restrictions a. Utilities due to the expected higher traffic or pedestrian volumes and the complexity of signalized intersection design requirements, utilities are often relocated during capital projects. Proposed utilities should be located so as to not interfere with the pedestrian pathway. Lower cost operationally funded projects may result in utilities not being moved. The design should balance preferred ramp placement and style with the expected cost and delay of required utility relocations. 5. County Goals and Policies establishing pedestrian equity and ensuring ADA compliance shall be achieved. 11

B. Arterial Neighborhood Principal and Neighborhood Minor Intersections Consideration should be given to future intersection signalization 1. Safety a. Traffic Control i. Signalization the placement of ramps needs to be considered in conjunction with the following: 1.1 pedestrian visibility and accessibility (particularly for turning movements) 1.2 pedestrian cone of vision to the pedestrian crossing signal head, 1.3 timing of the pedestrian crossing signal, 1.4 location of pedestrian actuation ii. Stop Control 1.1 pedestrian visibility (particularly for turning movements) 1.2 pedestrian crossing distance b. Pedestrian Safety i. Pedestrian Crossing Distance this distance needs to be minimized where possible to ensure the greatest degree of safety for pedestrians. At signalized intersections this distance is less critical and is mitigated through the ability to control signal timing. At skewed intersections the shortest crossing distance does not necessarily result in the best pedestrian crossing location. ii. Visibility of and by Pedestrians The crossing distance and visibility of pedestrians especially with turning traffic is highly inter-related. 2. Street Characteristics a. Street Channelization the placement of ramps needs to be considered in conjunction with the following: i. alignment of crosswalks, ii. number of traffic lanes, including turning lanes iii. presence and size of median islands both raised and surface panted, iv. presence of raised channelization, v. conflicts between pedestrian walkways and raised channelization 3. Pedestrian Continuity a. Desire Lines i. On arterial streets the pedestrian desire line may be farther removed from the intersection due to the presence of obstructions within the sidewalk and this may conflict with the goal of pedestrian visibility and safety. 12

4. Obstructions and Restrictions a. Utilities Proposed utilities should be located so as to not interfere with the pedestrian pathway. Lower cost operationally funded projects may result in utilities not being moved. The design should balance preferred ramp placement and style with the expected cost and delay of required utility relocations. 5. County Goals and Policies establishing pedestrian equity and ensuring ADA compliance shall be achieved. C. Neighborhood Principal - Neighborhood Principal Intersection Consideration should be given to future intersection signalization 1. Safety a. Traffic Control type of control will drive the design and placement of ramps b. Pedestrian Safety i. Pedestrian Crossing Distance this distance needs to be minimized where possible to ensure the greatest degree of safety for pedestrians. At signalized intersections this distance is less critical and is mitigated through the ability to control signal timing. At skewed intersections the shortest crossing distance does not necessarily result in the best pedestrian crossing location. ii. Visibility of and by Pedestrians The crossing distance and visibility of pedestrians especially with turning traffic is highly inter-related. 2. Obstructions a. Utilities b. ROW Availability c. Landscaping exceptions to the relocation of high value hardscape and removal of large trees may be considered during design of ramp type and placement. d. Topography 3. Street Characteristics a. Intersection Geometry b. Traffic Calming and Traffic Circles 4. Pedestrian Continuity receiving ramps shall be provided at all corners of the intersection regardless of the presence of sidewalks. 13

5. Community Desires a. To minimize concrete coverage the use of modified/alternative ramps may be considered for use providing all safety and operational requirements for the ramps are met. D. Neighborhood Principal - Neighborhood Minor Intersection 1. Safety a. Traffic Control type of control will drive the design and placement of ramps b. Pedestrian Safety i. Visibility of and by pedestrians c. Crosswalks at these intersections crosswalks may be marked or unmarked. Crosswalks are typically not marked on local streets in low-density residential neighborhoods. Refer to the MUTCD and ADA for guidance on use of distinctive color combinations when using traffic calming gateways. 2. Obstructions a. ROW Availability b. Utilities c. Landscaping - exceptions to the relocation of high value hardscape and removal of large trees may be considered during design of ramp type and placement. d. Topography 3. Street Characteristics a. Intersection Geometry b. Traffic Calming and Traffic circles c. Street Topography 4. Community Desires a. To minimize concrete coverage the use of modified/alternative ramps may be considered for use providing all safety and operational requirements for the ramps are met. b. The designer should consider impacts to landscaping when designing and placing ramps but not to the point that safety and operational requirements are compromised. 5. Pedestrian Continuity receiving ramps shall be provided at all corners of the intersection regardless of the presence of sidewalks. 14

E. Neighborhood Minor - Neighborhood Minor Intersection 1. Safety a. Traffic Control type of control will drive the design and placement of ramps b. Pedestrian Safety i. Visibility of and by pedestrians c. Crosswalks at these intersections crosswalks may be marked or unmarked. Crosswalks are typically not marked on local streets in low-density residential neighborhoods. Refer to the MUTCD and ADA for guidance on use of distinctive color combinations when using traffic calming gateways. 2. Obstructions a. ROW Availability b. Landscaping - exceptions to the relocation of high value hardscape and removal of large trees may be considered for ramp type and placement. c. Topography d. Utilities 3. Street Characteristics a. Intersection Geometry b. Traffic Calming and Traffic circles c. Street Topography 4. Community Desires a. To minimize concrete coverage the use of modified/alternative ramps may be considered for use providing all safety and operational requirements for the ramps are met. b. To minimize impacts to parking at tee intersections one or both of the following may be considered for use by TE&O i. On low volume residential street a combination driveway/curb ramp may be used. The combination driveway/ramp must be constructed to insure that all ADA slope requirements are met and that no lip exists at the foot of the ramp. Detectable warning truncated domes shall be installed for the entire width of the combination driveway/ramp. ii. At least one crossing shall be constructed to meet the legal requirement of no parking within (20 ) twenty feet of approaching the ramp. c. The designer should consider impacts to landscaping when designing and placing ramps but not to the point that safety and operational requirements are compromised. 5. Pedestrian Continuity receiving ramps shall be provided at all corners of the intersection regardless of the presence of sidewalks. 15

F. All Street Alley Intersection 1. Alleys provide access to the side or rear of buildings. Alleys shall be connected to the street with a County standard commercial driveway. G. Mid Block Crossings when placing ramps on mid block crossings a County standard curb extension (nub) shall be incorporated on the side or sides of the street where parking is proposed or exists. H. Trail Crossings ramps shall be incorporated at all trail crossings and should be sized appropriately depending upon use. I. Other 1. Ramps in islands and medians if the width of a median island can not accommodate two standard ramps and a landing, the designer shall consider using a full crosswalk width cut through. Detectable warning truncated domes shall be installed on all medians and islands considered to be a pedestrian refuge. DESIGN A. Ramp Widths 1. The ramp width shall be sized appropriately depending on use. 2. Bollards may be installed on ramps wider than 8 in such a way to discourage vehicular use but not impede pedestrians or bicyclists. B. Ramp materials 1. All ramps shall be constructed from un-tinted poured-in-place concrete. C. Detectable warnings 1. Acceptable materials & installation - Pre-manufactured composite modules are preferred for all installations. a. Pre-manufactured composite modules i. Embedded into concrete base preferred ii. Surface affixed shall only be used in retrofit installations b. When Pre-manufactured composite modules can not be used precast concrete modules may be used. Precast modules shall be 12 x12 x2 or 24 x24 x2 in size and shall be installed with mortar on a 4 thick poured in pace concrete base. 16

2. Color combinations - It is Arlington s desire to provide ADA compliant detectible warnings that harmonize with their setting as well as providing tonal contrast. Therefore all surfaces requiring detectable warning (truncated domes) shall conform to the following criteria: a. Dark grey shall be the default color of all detectible warnings set in concrete. b. Dark red may be considered as an option in locations that include significant areas of brick or dark red pavers in the sidewalk. 17

DETAILS NOTE: Check to ensure most current VDOT detail prior to use. 18

19

20

21