F.1 ENHANCED FISCALLY CONSTRAINED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Similar documents
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Pedestrian Roadway Facilities. DOT HS , April 2003.

US287 Asset Inventory Fort Collins. Figure 5-1 Fort Collins Bridges and Traffic Signals

US287 Asset Inventory Loveland. Figure 6-1 Loveland Bridges and Traffic Signals

Appendix B. Existing Transfort System Route Profiles

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Draft MOBILITY ELEMENET. Community Meeting May 22, 2013

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04

UPDATE TO THE FORT COLLINS BICYCLE PLAN & PROGRAM

STATION #3 INITIAL ALTERNATIVES

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

T1-A - Service Reduction (Re-sizing)

BICYCLE FACILITIES FULL BUILD PLAN

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

Welcome to the Quebec Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

in the pop-up survey after drawing it. UPLOAD PHOTOS when you add a route or point or by clicking on an existing route or point.

SR-203 Sidewalks and Town-Wide Mobility Improvements. Town Council Presentation September 7, 2016

Section Access Control Plan - SH 14 (Mulberry Street)

Walking Survey Results, 2010

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

3.0 ACCESS CONTROL PLAN - HARMONY ROAD (SH68)

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Bluffdale/ UDOT South High-T Intersection Project Type Operations

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT

FY Regional Transportation Improvement Program

Draft Recommended List of Potential Projects

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

FINAL DRAFT ETC Master Plan. Appendix C Public Input

ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY

Bellevue Transportation: Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities Bellevue Downtown Association September 20, 2018

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Engineering - Bicycle and Pedestrian

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

A Matter of Fairness: ROCOG s Environmental Justice Protocol. What is Mobility Limitation?

STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. October 8, 2015

3.0 Future Conditions

Neighborhood Walking, Biking, and Transit Tours Summary BACKGROUND

State Highway 16/McDermott Road Kuna-Mora Road to Ada/Gem County Line

State Highway 44/State Street High Capacity Corridor

Transportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

Hennepin County Transportation Department

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

ACTIA Programs Annual Compliance Report Reporting Year Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Table 1: Summary of Expenditures and Accomplishments

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

APPENDIX D: SACRAMENTO URBAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES

State Highway 16 Kuna-Mora Road to Ada/Gem County Line

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

State Highway 16 Kuna-Mora Road to Ada/Gem County Line

Active Transportation Access to Transit

4.0 ACCESS CONTROL PLAN - SH 14 (JEFFERSON STREET/RIVERSIDE AVENUE)

Attachment One. Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

Multi Modal Transit Access Plan KIPDA ID # 239. Project Type: STUDY

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

RapidRide Roosevelt Seat Sea t t le t le Depa De r pa t r men men t of Sept T an r sp an or sp t or a t t a ion

Comprehensive Collection of Stakeholder Alternatives by Mode

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

5.0 Roadway System Plan

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

Cottonwood Heights HAWK Pedestrian Crossing on Fort Union Blvd. Project Type Capital Improvement

connections 2040 the waco metropolitan transportation plan amendment 2

Sarasota/Manatee MPO Project Priorities 2016 Adopted April 25, 2016

ECONOMY PEOPLE ENVIRONMENT

2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:

FOR REFERENCE: Annabelle Berklund Ross Cunniff Staff Liaison: Paul Sizemore

Most Important Part of any Plan

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Freeway System Considerations

CITY OF ELKO BICYCLE AND PATHWAY PLAN

RiNo Railroad Crossing Connectivity Analysis. Stakeholder Workshop June 29, 2017

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Complete Streets Process and Case Study: Taft / McMillian Two-Way Street Conversion Cincinnati, Ohio. Traffic Engineering Workshop June 4, 2014

City of White Rock. Strategic Transportation Plan. May 16, 2005

FAYETTE COUNTY. Fayette County Active Transportation Profile REGIONAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

In Collaboration with: City of Belton Cass County FHWA Johnson County KDOT MoDOT City of Olathe City of Overland Park

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b HCAOG TAC meeting of May 8, 2014

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

FUNDING SOURCES CHAPTER 6

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

OTO BIKE/PED PLAN REPORT

% of Sales Tax (net of Admin) First Year Amount. Metro State of Good Repair 2% $ 17 $ 350 $ 910 $ 1,140 $ 2,400

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Transcription:

APPENDIX F

F.0 APPENDIX F F.1 ENHANCED FISCALLY CONSTRAINED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Recognizing the limitations of the fiscally constrained CIP discussed in Section 7.5, an enhanced fiscally constrained CIP was developed. The enhanced fiscally constrained CIP assumes that some form of dedicated funding would be identified for transportation in Fort Collins. It is important to note that the funding scenario used to develop the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP is one of an infinite number of scenarios that could be implemented to identify additional funding for transportation projects. The process used to develop the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP follows exactly the process that was used to develop the fiscally constrained CIP. F.1.1 Funding Scenario The funding approach assumes that the funds identified in the fiscally constrained CIP are still available and that the new funds would be additional to those previously identified. The funding scenario for the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP includes: 0.25 percent sales tax rate increase for the Pavement Management Program 0.25 percent sales tax increase for additional transportation capital projects $1,000,000 annual contribution from the General Fund starting in 2005 Increases in the Street Oversizing Fee schedule Implementing a Transportation Maintenance Fee of $0.10 per trip per month Please note that none of the strategies have been approved by voters or City Council, they are being used only as a means to evaluate the potential of identifying a dedicated funding source for transportation projects. Table F.18 identifies the additional funding that would be available for transportation capital projects. Appendix E contains more detailed information on how the revenues were developed. Table F.18 Additional Forecasted Revenues to Fund Transportation Capital s between 2004 and 2025 (2003 dollars) Revenue Source Additional Revenues (2003 dollars) 0.25 percent for transportation capital $172,850,000 General Fund Contribution $25,500,000 Street Oversizing Fee increase $31,150,000 Transportation Maintenance Fee $27,800,000 Total $257,300,000 The additional capital was distributed by mode according to the amounts and percentages shown in Table F.19. F-1

Table F.19 Distribution of Additional Transportation Capital by Mode (2003 dollars) Transportation Mode Capital (2003 dollars) Percentage of Total Streets $166,590,000 65% Transit $27,100,000 11% Bicycle (includes part of MTC) $10,300,000 4% Pedestrian $5,710,000 2% Rail Crossings $34,100,000 13% Parking $9,500,000 4% ATMS $4,000,000 2% Total $257,300,000 100% The process of developing the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP began with funding projects by mode based on the distribution shown in Table F.18. This process was continued until all capital dollars were exhausted in each mode. In some cases, higher priority projects were not funded because sufficient funds were not available. Figure F.12 shows the projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. It is interesting to note that as compared to the fiscally constrained CIP, there are several intersections and other facilities that could not be built internal to the City. lists for each mode are contained in the following sections. F-2

Figure F.12 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained s

F.1.2 Streets The list of street projects for the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP began with breaking out the cost of each project by who would contribute to the. s were allocated in four categories: development direct contribution, street oversizing fees, city capital, and state or Federal funds. s were then matched to available funding until the revenues were exhausted. Many of the street projects that were funded also included the accompanying pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Table F.20 shows the list of street projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP including the overall project rank and the projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. Table F.20 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s - Streets Location From To Facility Type Priority Category 1 R132 C1 Timberline Drake Prospect 4 lane arterial $11,400,000 High 1 2 R46 B Harmony Seneca College 4 lane arterial $7,500,000 High 2 Overall Ranking 3 R47 B Harmony Lemay Timberline 6 lane arterial $8,700,000 High 2 4 R117 Shields Elizabeth $4,000,000 High 2 5 R127 Taft Hill Elizabeth $4,000,000 High 2 6 R22 College Prospect $4,000,000 High 6 7 R21 College Drake $4,000,000 High 6 8 R71 Lemay Lincoln Conifer 4 lane arterial $23,000,000 High 8 9 R48 Harmony Mason $4,000,000 High 8 10 R156 Taft Hill Horsetooth $3,000,000 High 10 11 R11 C College Fossil Creek Harmony 6 lane arterial $8,700,000 High 10 12 R47 C Harmony Timberline Ziegler 6 lane arterial $6,675,000 High 10 13 R47 D Harmony Ziegler I-25 6 lane arterial $10,680,000 High 10 14 R69 Lemay Drake $4,000,000 High 10 15 R104 B Prospect Summit View I-25 4 lane arterial $4,000,000 High 15 16 R17 College Harmony $4,000,000 High 15 17 R128 Taft Hill LaPorte $3,000,000 High 15 18 R27 College Willox $3,000,000 High 15 19 R12 A College Vine Conifer 4 lane arterial $8,000,000 High 15 20 R47 A Harmony College Lemay 6 lane arterial $8,700,000 High 15 21 R68 Lemay Horsetooth 22 R42 Elizabeth Overland Trail 23 R49 Harmony Ziegler 24 R19 College Horsetooth 25 R23 College Mulberry $3,000,000 High 15 Taft Hill 2 lane minor arterial $3,337,500 High 22 $2,000,000 High 23 $4,000,000 High 24 $4,000,000 High 24 F-4

26 R2 Location From To Facility Type Annual Capital (bridges,, and RR upgrades) 27 R67 Lemay Harmony 28 R106 Prospect Lemay Minor street and intersection (, bridges, railroads) Priority Category Overall Ranking $13,200,000 High 26 $4,000,000 Medium 27 $4,000,000 Medium 27 29 R103 Prospect College Lemay 4 lane arterial $8,000,000 Medium 27 30 R80 Mountain Meldrum College 2 lane minor arterial $750,000 Medium 27 31 R124B Taft Hill Harmony Horsetooth 4 lane arterial $4,000,000 Medium 31 32 R114 C Shields Fossil Creek Harmony 4 lane arterial $6,500,000 Medium 31 33 R59 JFK Troutman $2,000,000 Medium 31 34 R119 Shields LaPorte $3,000,000 Medium 31 35 R129 Taft Hill Mulberry $2,000,000 Medium 31 36 R70 Lemay Riverside $2,000,000 Medium 31 37 R20 College Swallow $2,000,000 Medium 31 38 R89 Mulberry Summit View $3,000,000 Medium 38 39 R65 Lemay Carpenter $2,000,000 Medium 39 40 R52 B Horsetooth Taft Hill Shields 4 lane arterial $4,000,000 Medium 39 41 R66 Lemay Trilby $3,000,000 Medium 39 42 R118 Shields Mulberry $2,000,000 Medium 39 43 R64 Laurel College $4,000,000 Medium 39 44 R144 US 287 State Highway 1 GMA 4 lane arterial $4,000,000 Medium 44 45 R102 Prospect Overland Trail Taft Hill 4 lane arterial $6,000,000 Medium 45 46 R132 E1 Timberline Mulberry 4 lane arterial and Mountain intersection Vista $22,000,000 Medium 45 47 R16 College Skyway $2,000,000 Medium 47 48 R85 A Mulberry Riverside Timberline 6 lane arterial $16,020,000 Medium 47 49 R85 B Mulberry Timberline Summit View 6 lane arterial $1,668,750 Medium 47 50 132 D1 Timberline Prospect Mulberry 4 lane arterial $16,000,000 Medium 47 51 R57 Jefferson Linden $2,000,000 Medium 47 52 R10 B Carpenter Lemay Timberline 4 lane arterial $4,005,000 Medium 52 53 R10 D Carpenter County Road 9 I-25 4 lane arterial $4,005,000 Medium 52 54 R151 A Ziegler Rock Creek Harmony 4 lane arterial $500,000 Medium 52 55 R41 Drake Timberline Rigden Pkwy 2 lane minor arterial $1,335,000 Medium 52 56 R151 B Ziegler Harmony Horsetooth 4 lane arterial $1,000,000 Medium 52 57 R53 Horsetooth Ziegler Strauss Cabin Rd 2 lane collector $2,670,000 Medium 52 58 R82 Mountain Vista Timberline I-25 4 lane arterial $10,012,000 Medium 52 59 R98 Overland Trail Drake $2,000,000 Medium 59 F-5

Location From To Facility Type 60 R164 Timberline Horsetooth 61 R18 College Boardwalk 62 R26 College Monroe 63 R63 LaPorte College 64 R29 Conifer Extension Priority Category Overall Ranking $2,000,000 Medium 59 $2,000,000 Medium 59 $2,000,000 Medium 59 $2,000,000 Medium 59 Lemay Timberline 2 lane minor arterial $3,200,000 Medium 59 65 R146 A Vine College Lemay 4 lane arterial $8,010,000 Medium 66 66 R146 B Vine Lemay Timberline 4 lane arterial $6,007,500 Medium 66 67 R96 C Overland Trail Prospect Mulberry 4 lane arterial $4,005,000 Medium 66 68 R11 A College Carpenter Trilby 6 lane arterial $10,680,000 Medium 66 69 R10 C Carpenter Timberline County Road 9 4 lane arterial $4,005,000 Medium 66 70 R11 B College Trilby Fossil Creek 6 lane arterial $10,680,000 Medium 66 71 R39 Drake Overland Trail Hampshire 4 lane arterial $2,000,000 Medium 66 72 R150 Ziegler Kechter Road Rock Creek 2 lane minor arterial $1,335,000 Medium 66 73 R33 A County Road 52 County County Route 11 Route 9 2 lane minor arterial $2,670,000 Medium 66 Total $358,595,750 F.1.3 Transit Transit capital revenues from the Transit Services Fund are sufficient to fund through Scenario 4 of the Transfort Strategic Plan including the Mason Transportation Corridor. Table F.21 shows the list of transit projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. These projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. Table F.21 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s Transit Transit Services/Capital Service Type/ Description Capital Strategic Plan Scenario 1 1 TC1 New/Replacement Vehicles $3,091,031 2 TC2 Shelters (Passenger Amenities) $68,750 3 TC3 Technology Improvements $424,000 4 TC4 Facilities - Maintenance/Repair $303,220 5 TC5 Planning $150,000 6 TC6 Bus Stop Access Modifications ADA Accessibility Improvements $69,480 Strategic Plan Scenario 2 7 TC7 New/Replacement Vehicles $4,613,000 8 TC7a Replacement Paratransit Buses 9 TC7b Service Vehicles/Pool Vehicles 10 TC8 Shelters (Passenger Amenities) $107,500 11 TC9 Technology Improvements $717,500 12 TC10 Facilities - Maintenance/Repair $720,477 F-6

Transit Services/Capital Service Type/ Description Capital 13 TC11 Bus Stop Access Modifications ADA Accessibility Improvements $69,480 14 TC12 Facilities - New Construction $24,496,000 15 Mason Transportation Corridor $65,950,000 Strategic Plan Scenario 3 16 TC14 New/Replacement Vehicles Replacement Fixed Route Buses $1,953,500 17 TC15 Bus Stop Access Modifications ADA Accessibility Improvements $69,480 18 TC16 Shelters (Passenger Amenities) Signage at Bus Stops $75,000 19 TC17 Technology Improvements $537,000 20 TC18 Facilities - Maintenance/Repair $702,321 Strategic Plan Scenario 4 21 TC19 New/Replacement Vehicles $2,151,324 22 TC20 Bus Stop Access Modifications $69,480 23 TC21 Shelters (Passenger Amenities) Signage at Bus Stops $75,000 24 TC22 Technology Improvements $193,000 25 TC23 Facilities - Maintenance/Repair $61,804 Long Range Plan 26 TC24 Replacement Buses (2015) $3,026,602 27 TC25 Replacement Buses (2018) $6,323,808 28 TC26 Replacement Buses (2022) $6,781,316 Total $106,668,347 F.1.4 Bicycle Several stand-alone bicycle projects are funded in the enhanced CIP and even more projects are funded by the corresponding street projects. There were a few projects that were not included in the initial estimate for the Mason Transportation Corridor that were funded the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. Table F.21 shows the list of bicycle projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP including the overall project rank and the projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. Table F.21 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s Bicycle Location From To Facility Type 1 B31a Mason Fossil Creek Trail Harmony Bike trail by BCC 2 B31b Mason Harmony Horsetooth Bike trail by BCC 3 B31c Mason Horsetooth Drake Bike trail by BCC F-7

Location From To Facility Type 4 B31d Mason Drake Spring Creek Bike trail by BCC 5 B31e Mason Spring Creek Trail Prospect Bike trail and pass with MTC 6 B31f Mason Prospect Laurel Bike lanes/ sidewalks in MTC 7 B31g Mason Laurel Cherry Bike lanes/ sidewalks in MTC 8 B31h Mason Troutman Grade separated P62/RR16 $1,500,000 9 B31i Mason NRRC Employment/ CSU Vet Campus Grade separated $1,200,000 10 B31j Mason Harmony Grade separated $2,400,000 11 B31k Mason Horsetooth Grade separated $2,100,000 12 B31l Mason Drake Grade separated RR5 $2,100,000 13 B3 Campus West/Elizabeth Shields City Park Bike/pedestrian @ Elizabeth and Plum 14 B10 College Vine Conifer Bike lanes R12A/R12B 15 B20 Jefferson Street P26 in 2003 Mountain College Bike lanes - $500,000 16 B57 College Carpenter Harmony Bike lanes R11A/R11B/R11C 17 B12 Elizabeth Overland Trail Taft Hill Bike lanes R42 18 B38 Mountain Meldrum Riverside Bike lanes Part in R80 $500,000 19 B64 Harmony BNSF tracks College Bike lanes R46 20 B65 Harmony Cinquefoil Lane Strauss Bike lanes R47D Cabin 21 B56 Carpenter Lemay Timberline Bike lanes R10 22 B72 Prospect Summit View I-25 Bike lanes R104A/R104B/ R104C F-8

Location From To Facility Type 23 B81 Vine Lemay Timberline Bike lanes R146B 24 B58 Cooper Slough Mulberry Underpass (P19) 25 B66 Horsetooth Ziegler Strauss Cabin Bike lanes R53 pedestrian Total $10,300,000 F.1.5 Pedestrian Several stand-alone pedestrian projects are funded in the enhanced CIP and even more projects are funded by the corresponding street projects. Table F.22 shows the list of pedestrian projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP including the overall project rank and the projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. Table F.22 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s - Pedestrian Location To From Facility Type 1 P26 Elizabeth City Park Shields Sidewalk (B3) in 2003 2 P9 College Carpenter Trilby Sidewalks R11A County 3 P10 College Trilby Fossil Creek Pkwy Sidewalks R11B County 4 P24 Drake Research Dr Electrical Substation Sidewalks in 2003 5 P31 Harmony JFK Boardwalk Sidewalks R47A County 6 P32 Harmony Rock Creek Condos 7 P8 College Vine Lemay Sidewalks in 2003 State Highway 1 Sidewalks R12A/R12B 8 P59 Stanford Horsetooth Monroe Sidewalks in 2003 9 P63 UPRR Trilby Under/overpass RR15 $1,000,000 10 P7 College Vine Woodlawn Sidewalks R12A 11 P33 Harmony Boardwalk Lemay Sidewalks R47A 12 P42 Linden Jefferson Buckingham Sidewalks R77 $200,000 13 P13 College Foothills Pkwy Monroe Sidewalks in 2003 14 P29 Harmony Shields Starflower Sidewalks $65,000 15 P47 MTC Various Neighborhood connections 16 P45 Mason Laurel Pedestrian 17 P4 Cherry Howes College Sidewalks $50,000 18 P34 Horsetooth Taft Hill Shields Sidewalks R52B 19 P14 College Swallow, Harvard Improvements $35,000 F-9

Location To From Facility Type 20 P67 Vine Linden Lemay Sidewalks $210,000 21 P39 Lemay Lincoln Vine Sidewalks R71 22 P1 Alta Vista Sidewalks $1,200,000 23 P36 LaPorte Sunset Taft Hill Sidewalks R62A $200,000 24 P41 Lincoln Riverside Lemay Sidewalks $200,000 25 P64 Vine Taft Hill Lyons Sidewalks R145B $300,000 26 P19 Cooper Slough Mulberry Underpass B58 County 27 P30 Harmony College Boardwalk Sidewalks R47A County 28 P49 Mulberry City Park Shields Sidewalks R86 29 P18 College Frontage Harvard Drake Sidewalks $50,000 Road 30 P61 Timberline Caribou Underpass $1,200,000 31 P11 College Fossil Creek Harmony Sidewalks R11C Pkwy 32 P65 Vine College Linden Sidewalks R146A 33 P35 JFK Pkwy Bockman Horsetooth Sidewalks $50,000 34 P37 Laurel Stover Endicott Sidewalks $50,000 35 P60 Taft Hill Trail access ramp $210,000 36 P38 Lemay Rule Drive Oakridge Drive Sidewalks $50,000 37 P25 Drake Brookwood RR Sidewalks $140,000 38 P3 Boardwalk Harmony Whalers Sidewalks $50,000 39 P66 Vine Lemay Timberline Shoulder R146B pavement 40 P62 Troutman BNSF rail line Bike/pedestrian RR16 pass 41 P43 Manhattan South of Horsetooth Sidewalks $100,000 42 P40 Lemay Parkwood subdivision Sidewalks $120,000 43 P57 Riverside Mulberry Mountain Sidewalks R109 $230,000 44 P51 Pedestrian Plan, ADA Ramps and Crossing Improvements 45 P46 Mason RR spur Cherry Sidewalks 46 P28 Harmony West of Regency Sidewalks R46B with Capital Total $5,710,000 F.1.6 Rail Crossings Several rail s projects are included in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. Some of these projects are stand-alone projects and some are included as part of street projects. Table F.23 shows the list of rail projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP including the overall project rank and the projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. F-10

Table F.23 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s Rail Crossings 1 RR1 Route/Facility From To Annual RR improvement program Service Type/ Description R2 Priority High 2 RR4 Downtown BNSF s High $900,000 3 RR5 Drake Mason RR grade separation (B35) High $10,000,000 4 RR8 Lake Mason RR High $150,000 5 RR9 Lemay Vine 6 RR13 Timberline Vine 7 RR16 Troutman Parkway RR grade separation RR grade separation Grade separation or (R71) High High $15,000,000 (B32) Medium $8,000,000 Total $34,050,000 F.1.7 Parking Phase 1 of the Downtown Strategic Plan and the Mulberry park-n-ride would be funded the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. Four other projects would be funded as part of the MTC. These funding assumptions do not include any private participation in funding the and are thus considered conservative. Table F.24 shows the list of parking projects in the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP including the overall project rank and the projects are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. F-11

Table F.24 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s Parking Parking Facility Name Location Service Type/ Description Overall Ranking 1 PK2a Downtown Strategic Plan Phase 1 Downtown Parking $8,500,000 1 2 PK4 Mulberry PNR Mulberry/I-25 New park and ride facility $1,000,000 2 3 PK3 South Transit Center Harmony/College New transit center 3 4 PK5 Horsetooth PNR Horsetooth/Mason New park and ride facility 5 5 PK6 Drake PNR Drake/Mason New park and ride facility 6 6 PK7 Troutman PNR Troutman/Mason New park and ride facility 11 Total $9,500,000 F.1.8 ATMS Both of the remaining ATMS projects are funded the enhanced fiscally constrained CIP. Table G.25 highlights these projects and they are also shown graphically in Figure F.12. Table F.25 Enhanced Fiscally Constrained CIP s ATMS Name/Location 1 TSM138 Streets Facility Expansion - de-icing $2,000,000 2 TSM161 Traffic Operations Management Center Expansion $2,000,000 Total $4,000,000 F-12