A Biomechanical Approach to Javelin. Blake Vajgrt. Concordia University. December 5 th, 2012

Similar documents
by Michael Young Human Performance Consulting

THE IMPULSE-STEP IN THE JAVELIN THROW

The Discus. By Al Fereshetian. Nature of the Event

Coaching the Hurdles

Serve the only stroke in which the player has full control over its outcome. Bahamonde (2000) The higher the velocity, the smaller the margin of

Critical Factors in the Shot Put

TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF THE JAVELIN THROW

Breaking Down the Approach

A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE HIGH RACQUET POSITION BACKHAND DRIVE OF AN ELITE RACQUETBALL PLAYER

Discus Technique: Basic Technique A Technical Analysis Grip Fork Gr Purpose: To provide control over Discus is held with Discus is held

ITF Coaches Education Programme Biomechanics of the forehand stroke

100 / 110m HURDLES. Contemporary Technique & Training. RALPH LINDEMAN, Head Track Coach US Air Force Academy

ITF Coaches Education Programme Coaching High Performance Players Course Power and the Tennis Serve.

Qualitative Analysis of Jumping Standing Long Jump Goals Note: Standing Long Jump

Javelin Throwing Technique and Biomechanics

Shot Technical Model

THE INITIAL STAGE THE FINAL STAGE

The Mechanics of Modern BREASTSTROKE Swimming Dr Ralph Richards

KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF SHOT PUT IN ELITE ATHLETES A CASE STUDY

ATHLETICS OMNIBUS - JAVELIN THROW From the Athletics Omnibus of Richard Stander, South Africa

THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPEED:

The Block Start and Accerlartion. Loren Seagrave Director of Track & Field and Cross Country Director of Speed and Movement

USA Track & Field Heptathlon Summit- November

PROPER PITCHING MECHANICS

AEROBIC GYMNASTICS Code of Points APPENDIX II Guide to Judging Execution and Difficulty

Axis of rotation is always perpendicular to the plane of movement

Implement Form Initial position Translation (also Rotation) Backwards

Butterfly Technique Checklist

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TAEKWONDO ROUNDHOUSE KICK EXECUTED BY THE FRONT AND BACK LEG - A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY

Purpose. Outline. Angle definition. Objectives:

BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF SPIKING TECHNIQUE IN VOLLEYBALL

Javelin Technical Model

Rules of Hurdling. Distance Between Hurdles

TECHNICAL MODELS & PROGRESSIONS FOR THE GLIDE SHOT PUT. Ben Bishop, Lake Park HS

APPLICATION OF FILMING AND MOTION ANALYSIS IN MOVEMENT STUDIES. Xie Wei Sports Medicine and Research Center, Singapore Sports Council, Singapore

Biomechanics Sample Problems

Discus Technical Model

Ankle biomechanics demonstrates excessive and prolonged time to peak rearfoot eversion (see Foot Complex graph). We would not necessarily expect

+ t1 t2 moment-time curves

Hurdle races recognized in the current competition regulation of the Spanish Athletics Federation are the followings:

ATHLETICS OMNIBUS - JAVELIN THROW From the Boland Athletics website:

GOLF SPECIFIC DYNAMIC WARM UP

Rugby Strength Coach. Speed development guide

Test Name Analysis Assessment Swing Correlation

-$9(/,1²/(9(/ Learning Activities. 78/ THROW (Javelin Level 1) Run, Jump, Throw and away we go! (2001)

Assessments SIMPLY GAIT. Posture and Gait. Observing Posture and Gait. Postural Assessment. Postural Assessment 6/28/2016

PHYSICS 12 NAME: Kinematics and Projectiles Review

Dynamic Warm up. the age of the athlete current physical condition and prior exercise experience

Positive running posture sums up the right technique for top speed

Swimming Breaststroke Checklist Marion Alexander, Yumeng Li, Adam Toffan, Biomechanics Lab, U of Manitoba

Ground Forces Impact on Release of Rotational Shot Put Technique

Normal Gait and Dynamic Function purpose of the foot in ambulation. Normal Gait and Dynamic Function purpose of the foot in ambulation

Performance & Motor Control Characteristics of Functional Skill. Part III: Throwing, Catching & Hitting

07/08/2017. Goalkeepers (GK) in soccer. Goal kicking of soccer? Previous study. The goal kicking of professional GK. Introduction

-Elastic strain energy (duty factor decreases at higher speeds). Higher forces act on feet. More tendon stretch. More energy stored in tendon.

400-Meter Hurdle Theory By Ralph Lindeman

Coaching the Triple Jump Boo Schexnayder

THROW. Skill Progressions at a Glance. General Criteria (for right-handed throws) Safety for the Throws

HOW TO HOLD THE SHOT

Lower Body Kinetics During the Delivery Phase of the Rotational Shot Put Technique

Modeling Human Movement

Running injuries - what are the most important factors

Sprinting: A Biomechanical Approach By Tom Tellez

LEVEL 1 SKILL DEVELOPMENT MANUAL

Biomechanical Analysis of a Sprint Start. Anna Reponen JD Welch

A Three-Dimensional Analysis of Overarm Throwing in Experienced Handball Players

Regents Exam Practice: Measurement, Kinematics, Free Fall, PJM, and UCM

Sprint/Speed Training

Motion is a function of both direction and speed. The direction may

Moving Toward a High Level of Competence Through a Systematic Approach

Palacký Univerzity in Olomouc Faculty of Physical Culture

Gait. Kinesiology RHS 341 Lecture 12 Dr. Einas Al-Eisa

100/110 Hurdle Training. Wendy Truvillion

Influence of Body Kinematics on Tennis Serve

TEMPORAL STRUCTURE OF A LEFT HAND TOSS VS. A RIGHT-HAND TOSS OF THE VOLLEYBALL JUMP SERVE

ABOUT THE TEACHING OF THROWING EVENTS

Structure (Down plane)

Maximizing Energy in the Pole Vault

ASSESMENT Introduction REPORTS Running Reports Walking Reports Written Report

The Hurdle Events. Jeff Martin IATCCC Clinic. Indianapolis, Indiana. 5 Myth s about Hurdling

Investigative Study: Movement Analysis

Putting Report Details: Key and Diagrams: This section provides a visual diagram of the. information is saved in the client s database

Force Vectors SHOT PUT MECHANICS

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Hip and groin pain in athletes Tak, I.J.R. Link to publication

POWERED FLIGHT HOVERING FLIGHT

Shot put learn by - doing Basic technique for the Shot Put By: Mark Harsha Portage High School Girls Head Coach

The Golf Swing. The Fundamentals

A COMPARISON OF SELECTED BIOMECHANICAL PARAMETERS OF FRONT ROW SPIKE BETWEEN SHORT SET AND HIGH SET BALL

Page 1 Introduction. Fast and slow twitch muscle fibres are. Page 2 The Sprint Start. Page 4 - Sprints. Page 5 - Middle Distance

SHOT PUT - GLIDE TECHNIQUE

GROUND REACTION FORCE DOMINANT VERSUS NON-DOMINANT SINGLE LEG STEP OFF

110m Hurdle Theory and Technique

Normal and Abnormal Gait

EDUCATION COURSES. Stride. Initial Swing (high knee) Mid stance Toe off Mid swing Initial contact

Colin Jackson's Hurdle Clearance Technique

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE 100M HURDLES

Biomechanics and Models of Locomotion

The Kinematics of Forearm Passing in Low Skilled and High Skilled Volleyball Players

Steffen Willwacher, Katina Fischer, Gert Peter Brüggemann Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany

Shot Put - Glide Technique by Rob Lasorsa, M-F Athletic

Transcription:

A Biomechanical Approach to Javelin Blake Vajgrt Concordia University December 5 th, 2012

The Biomechanical Approach to Javelin 2 The Biomechanical Approach to Javelin Javelin is one of the four throwing events sanctioned by track and field governing bodies. The sport involves a spear-like implement that is thrown overhead into a sector from a runway. Javelin is performed for distance through three stages: the runway, drawback, and throw. The implement is influenced by projectile motion physics. Research has been performed regarding the optimal variables that are found in a good throw. Variables such as javelin release speed and angle, throwing mechanics, and strength all play an extremely important role in the throw. Javelin is considered a highly dangerous sport in track and field due to the spear like shape of the implement. The event is normally only legal at the collegiate and international levels of competition where athletes have more body control and awareness of their surroundings. Implements are made from lightweight metal alloys. They consist of a head, a shaft that can be hollow or solid, and a grip surface usually made from braided string (Rosenbaum, 2012). The article Olympic Javelin Throw Rules by Mike Rosenbaum states at the collegiate and international level, the men s javelin mass is 800 grams and length is 2.6 to 2.7 meters long, and the women s javelin mass is 600 grams and length is 2.2 to 2.3 meters long (2012). The metal tip of the javelin must stick into the ground for a throw to be considered legal, and the distance is measured from the throw line (Rosenbaum, 2012). The convex shape of the javelin aids in its aerodynamic flight pattern, causing it to be twenty times more aerodynamic than the discus (Leigh, Liu, and Yu, 2010). When designing javelins, manufacturers seek to produce an implement with a high vibration frequency when in flight (Farjoun & Neu, 2005). Javelins often have hollow shafts, which help achieve the desired

The Biomechanical Approach to Javelin 3 vibration. Researchers Fossi Farjoun and John Neu found that a hollow implement will have a frequency of vibration five times greater when compared to a solid beam (2005). When looking at the javelin throw, there are three distinct stages. The first stage is the runway. In this stage, athletes start from standing position and run forward with the implement in hand. The purpose of the runway is to develop linear velocity and momentum that can later be transferred to the javelin at the throw. The velocity built up in the runway works to increase the release speed of the javelin through relative means. For example, if an athlete is moving linearly at eighteen miles per hour, the javelin will already be moving at that speed and the angular velocity from the movements in the throw will be added to this translational velocity of the runway. Movement in the sagittal plane characterizes the runway stage. The javelin is held in a static position at the shoulder during the run up. Athletes, with proper running mechanics, focus on accelerating down the runway while maintaining body control. High knee drive and foot contact underneath the center of gravity are key coaching points in a proper runway. The primary movements are flexion and extension in the hip and knee joints and plantarflexion and dorsiflexion at the ankle joint. The hip extensors (hamstring group and gluteus group), knee extensors (quadriceps group), and gastronemius all play a role in velocity development of the runway. The next stage in the javelin throw is the pull or drawback. The purpose of this stage is to put the body in position to execute a throw. Motion transitions to frontal and transverse planes. During the pullback, the shoulder horizontally abducts and the elbow extends to bring the arm and javelin parallel to the ground at shoulder level or higher. This motion stores elastic potential

The Biomechanical Approach to Javelin 4 energy that is released during the throw. The body rotates during the pullback so that it is perpendicular to the throw line. The lower body transitions to crossover steps, which helps, maintain the translational speed of the turned body. The crossover steps place the body in a position where the hips are able to rotate during the throw, transferring the translational speed of the runway to angular velocity in the body s joints. The primary movements in the lower body of the pullback are abduction/adduction; flexion/extension of the hips, flexion and extension of the knee, and plantarflexion and dorsiflexion of the ankle joint. The same major muscle groups that were described in the runway stage are used in the pullback stage in the lower body. The third stage is the throw. It is the most technical and well-researched stage. The purpose of the throw is to transfer the angular velocity and energy developed from movements at involved joints to the javelin upon release. Research has shown that the initiation and sequence of the throw in the lower and upper body is different for males and females. The throw exhibits a proximal to distal sequence in the upper body (shoulder to wrist) and deviations from the pattern leads to shorter throw distances (Liu, Leigh & Yu, 2010). In males, the upper body sequence is as follows: trunk forward rotation, throwing shoulder horizontal adduction during final foot contact, throwing shoulder abduction, throwing elbow extension, throwing shoulder internal rotation, and wrist flexion (Liu et. al, 2010). Females exhibit a slightly modified throwing sequence. In females, the upper body sequence is contrasted by: trunk forward rotation, throwing shoulder abduction (after final foot contact), throwing shoulder horizontal adduction, elbow extension and shoulder internal rotation, and wrist flexion (Liu et. al, 2010). The differences between the sexes are that males begin the throw

The Biomechanical Approach to Javelin 5 at the shoulder with horizontal adduction while females begin with abduction. Males also begin the throw simultaneously with final foot contact. Movements of the upper body occur in all planes of motion and the body transitions from a perpendicular to parallel arrangement to the throw line. At the throw, there is a plant foot (final foot contact) and non-dominant foot. The plant foot is on the opposite side of the body of the throwing shoulder. In males, the lower body sequence is as follows: non-dominant hip abduction and internal rotation, hip extension, nondominant foot touchdown, knee extension, plantarflexion, pelvis forward rotation, plant leg hip adduction, plant foot contact, and plant hip extension followed by release of javelin (Liu et. al, 2010). The females perform this sequence: non-dominant hip internal rotation, hip abduction, foot contact, knee extension, ankle plantarflexion, pelvis forward rotation, plant hip adduction, plant foot contact, and plant hip extension (followed by release of the javelin) (Liu et. al, 2010). In females, non-dominant hip internal rotation and abduction are separate when comparing the motions found in males. Females also exhibit simultaneous forward pelvic rotation with nondominant knee extension and ankle plantar flexion, while those motions are separate in males. Liu et. al suggests that males are quicker with hip extension prior to non-dominant foot contact (2010). This quick hip extension is more efficient in helping to transfer angular energy to the javelin and maintaining the velocity accumulated during the runway and pullback. Males had an average hip extension time of -0.002 seconds (due to motion occurring prior to foot contact) compared to 0.046 seconds in females (Liu et. al, 2010). This difference can help explain why males are able to throw further than females.

The Biomechanical Approach to Javelin 6 Differences in the sequence and angles of the throwing motion lead to greater acceleration and distances when comparing javelin to other throwing sports. Javelin throwers exhibit a longer acceleration path of the upper body due to the sequence of the throwing motion (Tillar, 2005). These long accelerations and decelerations lead to greater torques and stress on the upper extremity joints, which can lead to injury in athletes. Greater distances are correlated with female throwers who have a more extended throwing elbow at non-dominant foot contact and in males whose throwing shoulder is more horizontally adducted and elbow is extended at plant foot contact (Leigh, Liu & Yu, 2010). The javelin throw is to subject projectile motion physics. A throw s distance is determined by the release speed, angle, and height of the javelin along with air resistance and drag. While release angle and height play important roles in the range of the javelin, but release speed is most the crucial factor in javelin throwing distance (Liu et. al, 2010). Javelin release speed is determined by the translational velocity built up during the runway and the transfer of angular velocities of the joints to the javelin upon release. In the throwing sequence, 70% of the release speed is built during the first 0.1 seconds (Forthomme, Crielaard, Forthomme & Croisier, 2007). The study Neural Network Based Models of Javelin Flight: Prediction of Flight Distances and Optimal Release Parameters that included data from elite throwers, showed the maximum release velocity was near 31.4 m/s (Maier, Wank, Bartonietz & Blickhan, 2000). Javelin release angle is also important in determining the range of a throw. These angles often range between 25 to 42 degrees (Maier et. al, 2000). In the runway stage of a throw, the athlete holds the javelin in a static position. The angle of the javelin to the horizon during the runway is called the angle of inclination. The angle of inclination plays a role in determining the range of the javelin. The difference between the release angles to the angle of inclination is

The Biomechanical Approach to Javelin 7 called the attack angle. A larger angle of attack often leads to extra motion that decreases the rotational energy that can be transferred to the javelin upon release, but javelins with small angles of inclination and lower angles of attack correlate with further range of the javelin (Leigh et. al, 2010). Projectile motion physics is determined by a continuum of interaction between the release speed, angle, and height variables. As one variable moves towards optimum, others move further away. Release speed as stated is the most important variable in determining the range of the javelin. In the interaction between release speed and angle, angles are often lower than 45 degrees to develop more speed upon release (Leigh et, al, 2010). The angle of attack plays a part in the interaction with release velocity. Higher release velocities should have angles of attack that are close to or slightly smaller than release angles (Maier et. al, 2000). Javelin is a biomechanically complex sport. It involves all planes of motions and a wide array of joint motions. The sport consists of three stages: the runway, pullback, and throw. The purposes of each of these stages are to ultimately deliver the javelin with maximal release speed. Javelin is subject to projectile motion physics, and the implements range relies on release angle, height, and speed as well as air resistance.

The Biomechanical Approach to Javelin 8 References Farjoun, Y., & Neu, J. (2005). The optimal shape of a javelin. Studies in Applied Mathematics, 115, 339-354. Forthomme, B., Crielaard, J. M., Forthomme, L., & Croisier, J. L. (2007). Field performance of javelin throwers: Relationship with Isokinetic Findings. Isokinetics and Exercise Science, 15, 195-202. Leigh, S., Liu, H., & Yu, B. (2010). Associations between javelin throwing technique and aerodynamic distance. International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports: Conference Proceedings Archive, 28, 1-2. Liu, H., Leigh, S., & Yu, B. (2010). Sequences of upper and lower extremity motions in javelin throwing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(12), 1459-1467. Maier, K. D., Wank, V., Bartonietz, K., & Blickhan, R. (2000). Neural network based models of javelin flight: Prediction of flight distances and optimal release parameters. Sports Engineering, 3, 57-63. Rosenbaum, M. (2012, Novem 15). Olympic javelin throw rules. Retrieved from http://trackandfield.about.com/od/javelin/a/javelinrules.htm Tillar, R. (2005). The biomechanics of the elbow in overarm throwing sports. International SportMed Journal,6(1), 7-24.