National Technical Information Service U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield Va

Similar documents
Micro Channel Recuperator for a Reverse Brayton Cycle Cryocooler

The Bubble Dynamics and Pressure Field Generated by a Seismic Airgun

.y..o ~ - \ o ~ ~~~I bl:..ill & ~j.a,_,.,ui J-1 ~4 b~

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS General Certifi cate of Education Advanced Level

Accurate Measurement of Steam Flow Properties

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

Evaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports

LOW PRESSURE EFFUSION OF GASES adapted by Luke Hanley and Mike Trenary

Analysis of Pressure Rise During Internal Arc Faults in Switchgear

LOW PRESSURE EFFUSION OF GASES revised by Igor Bolotin 03/05/12

De-Mystify Aviation Altimetry. What an Aircraft Altimeter Really Tells You, And What It Doesn t!

NONIII F/S 13/10 EVALUATION OF ME 12 SURFACE-SUPPORTED DIVING SYSTEM (,SSDS) MODI-ETCIUI JUN 81 E H PAHL UNCLASSIFIED NEDU-7-81

Development of Low Volume Shape Memory Alloy Variable Ballast System for AUV Use

Boyle s Law VC 09. Experiment 9: Gas Laws. Abstract

AD-A1IN 908 DAVID W TAYLOR NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMEN(T CE--ETC FIG 17/2 POSEIDON BUOY ROL.L CONTROL EVALUATION. (Ul JAN 52 C A HOLBERBER

MODELING OF THERMAL BEHAVIOR INSIDE A BUBBLE

(fig. 3) must be at the same temperature as the water in this chamber CALORIMETRIC STUDIES OF THE EXTREMITIES

Is lung capacity affected by smoking, sport, height or gender. Table of contents

DEVELOPMENT OF PRIMARY FRAGMENTATION SEPARATION DISTANCES FOR CASED CYLINDRICAL MUNITIONS

Gas Sampling in the DST

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

DAVID W. TAYLOR NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER

CALCULATING THE SPEED OF SOUND IN NATURAL GAS USING AGA REPORT NO Walnut Lake Rd th Street Houston TX Garner, IA 50438

ELEVATION CORRECTION FACTORS FOR RADON MONITORS*

International Journal of Technical Research and Applications e-issn: , Volume 4, Issue 3 (May-June, 2016), PP.

Smart Water Application Technologies (SWAT)

A Performanced Based Angle of Attack Display

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF NAVY DIVE COMPUTER USE IN SHIPS HUSBANDRY DIVING: ANALYSIS OF DIVES CONDUCTED ON THE USS RONALD REAGAN (CVN-76)

Paper 2.2. Operation of Ultrasonic Flow Meters at Conditions Different Than Their Calibration

Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences

Investigating the effects of interchanging components used to perform ripple assessments on calibrated vector network analysers

THE EFFECT OF INTERMITTENT EXPOSURE TO 3% C0 2 ON ACID-BASE BALANCE AND ELECTROLYTE EXCRETION

DOT HS September Crash Factors in Intersection-Related Crashes: An On-Scene Perspective

Product Technical Bulletin #48

Design and Implementation of Automatic Air Flow Rate Control System

CFD AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF AERODYNAMIC DEGRADATION OF ICED AIRFOILS

LEAP CO 2 Laboratory CO 2 mixtures test facility

23 RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BALLISTICS TARRAGONA, SPAIN APRIL 2007

Effect of Fluid Density and Temperature on Discharge Coefficient of Ogee Spillways Using Physical Models

National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Wind Resource Data Summary Guam Naval Ordnance Annex Data Summary and Retrieval for November 2009

W1111L U125. Jill LA 11.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS- 1963,A -JI

Modeling Diffusion Rates of a Gas in an Enclosed Space

Gamblers Favor Skewness, Not Risk: Further Evidence from United States Lottery Games

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

LAKE WASHINGTON SOCKEYE SALMON STUDIES. Richard E. Thorne and James J. Dawson

INTERACTION BETWEEN WIND-DRIVEN AND BUOYANCY-DRIVEN NATURAL VENTILATION Bo Wang, Foster and Partners, London, UK

An experimental validation of a robust controller on the VAIMOS autonomous sailboat. Fabrice LE BARS

Smoke and heat Ventilator Testing

PURE SUBSTANCE. Nitrogen and gaseous air are pure substances.

TECH TIP 14. Minimum Surface Area Measurements with Micromeritics Physisorption Analyzers

SUBMARINE BASE, GROTON, CONN. REPORT NUMBER 855

Effects of Dissolved Gases in Surfactant Dissolution Media

Experimental Analysis on Vortex Tube Refrigerator Using Different Conical Valve Angles

INCLINOMETER DEVICE FOR SHIP STABILITY EVALUATION

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD N 6

13.1!"#$#%"&'%()$*+%,+-.$+/*$#

I ffflfflfflfflfflfflf

Variability of SCUBA diver s Acoustic Emission

Characteristics of Decompression Tank Internally Pressurized With Water Using OpenFOAM Syamsuri 1, a

A Nomogram Of Performances In Endurance Running Based On Logarithmic Model Of Péronnet-Thibault

Naval Postgraduate School, Operational Oceanography and Meteorology. Since inputs from UDAS are continuously used in projects at the Naval

One of the most important gauges on the panel is

Pearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England and Associated Companies throughout the world

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DIVISION NEWPORT OFFICE OF COUNSEL PHONE: FAX: DSN:

Hydrostatic Force on a Submerged Surface

Lab # 03: Visualization of Shock Waves by using Schlieren Technique

Use of Additional Through Lanes at Signalized Intersections

How does atmospheric pressure vary? Measuring atmospheric pressure at different altitudes above sea level

Evaluation of the Wisconsin DOT Walking Profiler

Wind Flow Validation Summary

ISSN: Page 410

An experimental study of internal wave generation through evanescent regions

Laboratory Activity Measurement and Density. Average deviation = Sum of absolute values of all deviations Number of trials

2012 INDUSTRY DAY Society of American Military Engineers - Omaha Post

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Hydroacoustic surveys of Otsego Lake s pelagic fish community,

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Analysis of Shear Lag in Steel Angle Connectors

WATER OIL RELATIVE PERMEABILITY COMPARATIVE STUDY: STEADY VERSUS UNSTEADY STATE

Additional Reading General, Organic and Biological Chemistry, by Timberlake, chapter 8.

INSTRUMENT INSTRUMENTAL ERROR (of full scale) INSTRUMENTAL RESOLUTION. Tutorial simulation. Tutorial simulation

( max)o Wind Waves 10 Short Swell (large wave steepness) 25 Long Swell (small wave steepness) 75

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF SPILLING BREAKERS

Department of the Navy. lnterim REPORT. November 1953

Waves, Turbulence and Boundary Layers

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

Boyle s law Verifying the relation between air pressure and volume measuring air pressure in a closed container.

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES

A simple and accurate apparatus for the generation of a calibrated water vapor pressure

save percentages? (Name) (University)

The University of Hong Kong Department of Physics Experimental Physics Laboratory

EVALUATION OF INTRAVENOUS THERAPY DEVICES IN THE HYPERBARIC CHAMBER

BERNOULLI EFFECTS ON PRESSURE.ACTIVATED W ATER LEVEL GAUGES

NAVAL SUBMARINE MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY

THE PRIMARY SOURCES OF SHIP NOISE OBSERVED ON THE BOTTOM OF SEA KAROL LISTEWNIK

CHARACTERISTICS OF LEAK DETECTION BASED ON DIFERENTIAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT

HIGH RESOLUTION DEPTH IMAGE RECOVERY ALGORITHM USING GRAYSCALE IMAGE.

NN- NAVY EXPERIMENTAL DIVING UNIT SECNIALRPOR NO. 6-9 NAV EPEIMETAL DI VING UIT~ TIC-99 DTIC QUAJLIXDISPECTED X

Transcription:

AD-752 491 THE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF PURE WATER AND STANDARD SEA WATER AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE. PART III. STANDARD SEA WATER V. John Castelli, et al Naval Ship Research and Development Center Annapolis, Maryland November 1972 DISTRIBUTED BY: National Technical Information Service U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield Va. 22151

II NAVAL SHIPRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER BetI, da. Md. 63 71 *THE TERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF PURE WATER AM STANDARD ISEA WATER AS A FUNCTION OP.PRESSURE AND TEERATURE E4 V Part III - Standard 6ea Water 4-1 "0" 4j $41 'eqby w ~Qw V. John Castelli and 2, X,. Stanley I. 3 'k Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. - oe 01E1 4"4 4 w MATERIALS DEPARTMENT 4J k Annapolis 0 4RESEARCH AND DEYELOP;,,ENT REPORT Reproduced by [M D D C, 00 NATIONAL TECHNICAL 11 1972 INFORMATION SERVICE!, C 111972 SSpi,,ifbid U r. 0portnron of C~,immerce.44, VA 22151,B November 1972 taeport 3566 ov

The $aval 3u9 RemseascaIud Dfweowpmoe Costor is a V. N 3mavy enter for laboratory Ifm dirs"to at achievia" ls0v04d see and mittv*ielcles. J,- woo tamed 40 March 1967 by m*clog the David Taylor Model Dawn t Cotrd4ack.Maorylind waik the Marine aniln*erjnfi Loburatory at Aa~imppolit, Maiyland. Navau Whip Revearch and Dovelopment Center IBethesda. Md. 2W034 MAJOR NSRDC ORGANIZATIONAL COMPONENTS O wiandfr 0 * ORIGINATOR TECHNICAL D1RiCTO7% 1 SREPORT - OFFICER-IN.CHARGE OFFICER-IM-04ARGE CARDNROCK ANNAPOLIS u SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SHIP, DEHPART1ENRdTIC PERORMANCE DEPARTMENT SURFACE AVIATION EFFECTS AND OEPARTMENT 16.n xacturesnt AND MATHEMATICS -. lf2 -D -WA ENT 17 DEPARTMENT 1:,.,,, L.. D... 'S ACOUSTICS AUXILIARY SYSTEMS... PARTMENT 19 DEPARTMENT. AL.SAL CENTRAL SINSTRUMENTATION

Security Classification UNCLASSIFIED DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA - R & D (security classification of tille. body of abstract and indexing annotation must be ented when the ove...l report Is classiled) 1. ORIGINATING ACTIVITY (CoPporate author) 2a. REPORT SECU.RITY CLASSIFICATION Naval Ship Research & Development Center Annapolis Laboratory Unclassified 2b. GROUP Annapolis, Maryland 21402 3. REPORT TITLE i The Thermal Conductivity of Pure Water and Standard Sea Water as a Function of Pressure and Temperature 4. DESCRIPTIVE NOTES (Type of report and Inclusive date&) Research and Development 5. AUTHOR($S (Firet name, middle initial, loat name) V. J. Castelli and E. M. Stanley }. REPORT DATE 741. TOTAL NO. OF PAGES OF REPS November 1972_ 6 8&, CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. 9a. ORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUIMBER(S) b. PROJECT NO. Task Area SF 11-552-101 3566 C. Task 12874 9b. OTHER REPORT NOMI (Any other numbers thatmay be a. sined this report) d. Work Unit 1-2853-101 t0' DISTRIOUTION STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. II. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES IT. SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY I NVSHIPS (ships 901K) 1". 6!4ACT Z Data are presented fbr the thermal conductivity of standard sea water over 0' to 3& C, at pressure to 1400 bars. An analysis of the results is given and comparison of the data with theoretical calculations for K at atmospheric pressure presented. Comparison of this data with that for pure water shows the thermal conductivity of sea water to be less of a function of pressure. (Authors) V.(PAGE 1) FORM SIN 0101-6 N'6v,/ 07-6800 -617.3 UNCLSSSIFIED "curity se C'lasisl(fi ton

SCUrity ClsiiainUNCLASSIFIED 1.LINK A LINK S LINK KEY WOROS -- - - ROLE WT ROLE WT ROLE WT Thermal conductivity Sea Water Temperature Pressure Apparatus Thermal diffusivity 1K, N, IPON I DD 'A'?.e.1473 (BACK) (P AGE' 2) UNqCLASSIFIED security Ciaasuircation

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER -U BETHESDA,MD. 20034 STANDARD SEA WATER AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE 3 iart III - Standard Sea Water fl aby U V. John Castelli and E. M. Stanley Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 5 November 1972 IIReport 3566

4.3. I LI ABSTRACT Data are presented for the thermal conductivity of standard sea water over 0* U to 300 C, at pressure to 1400 bars. An analysis of the results is given and comparison of the data with theoretical calculations for K at atmospheric pressure presented. Comparison of this data with that for pure water shows the thermal conductivity of sea water to be less of a function of pressure. a2 N I iii

ADMINISTRATIVE INFOR.MATION[ This report is part of Task Area SF-11-552-101, Task 12874, Work Unit 1-2853-101, as described in the 1 July 1972 Program Summary. The mention of proprietary products or devices by name in no way implies that they are endorsed by the U. S. Navy to the exclusion of other similar products or devices, nor may such mention be made in commercial advertising. iv

5 ITABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT iii ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION iv O INTRODUCTION 1 I' I' EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS 1 PRECISION, ACCURACY AND ERROR ANALYSIS 2 RESULTS 2 DISCUSSION 6 CONCLUSIONS 7 TECHNICAL REFERENCES 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Graph; Experimental Data for the Thermal 3 ~Conductivity of Standard Sea Water as a Function of Pressure for Various Temperatures Figure 2 - Graph; Thermal Conductivity of Standard 5 Sea Water as a Function of Pressure as Determined from Equation 1 at Various Temperatures INITIAL DISTRIBUTION -U Il I * V

U INTRODUCTION A continuing effort of oceanographic research at this [j activity is the determination of various chemical/physical properties of sea water as a function of pressure. Previous projects have included viscosity and refractive index measurements at pressure. The most recently completed project is the determination of thermal conductivity for sea water and pure water in the temperature range of 00 to 300 C* and the pressure Lrange of 0 to 1400 bars. This is the third and last in the series of reports and describes the experimental setup and results of the experimental determinations of the thermal conductivity for standard sea water. SU u EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS Measurements of the thermal conductivity of standard sea water were conducted at temperatures of +1.82%, 10.230, 20.220, S and 30.250 C and nominal pressures of 10, 200, 400. 600. 800, 1000, 1200, and 1400 bars. 1J LI [j]i The cleansing, filling, and setup procedures for the use of the special high-pressure experimental apparatus have been previously described.? The sea water used throughout this phase of the experiment was International Association of Physical Oceanography Standard Sea Water of Chlorinity 19.3705 L. Using the newly redefined relationship between chlorinity and salinity given by Wooster, et al,, as Salinity - 1.80655 Chlorinity LI LI \IA yields a value of 34.994 o/o0 salinity for the water used in this experiment. *Abbreviations used in this text are from the GPO Style Manual, 1967, unless otherwise noted. 'Superscripts refer to similarly numbered entries in the Technical References at the end of the text. 1! 1 N'

I 3 PRECISION, ACCURACY AND ERROR ANALYS', S I In these measurements, as previously, two distinct series were conducted with different thermocouple junctions. Each series consisted of at least three determinations of each data. point and many determinations of selected "reference" data points, primarily at 10 bars pressure. In almost all cases, the data resultant from any particular series agreed to within 0.3% of the mean value. The reasons for this variation, as well as a discussion of the accuracy and a complete error analysis have been previously described. 3 RESULTS The corrected results of our determinations for standard sea water are listed in table 1, and are shown graphically in figure 1. 1 ~ ~ A 1 -,nimr., comuctiv'it (10-.5 WA,,T,,/CM-G) OF' 4.994m s"',m SEA WATER AS A F CTIrN [I ~OF TM'PBMATURE AM~ PRESSURE Temperature, * C 1 10.23 20.22-30 125 - Pressure -I 1I. I. - I.. I S10 555 558.5 571.o 570.0 5880 585.5 6o0.0 598.0 200 562.o 565.0 578.5 5n.o 595.5 592.o 67.0 603'05 S400 369.5 571.5 585.5 584.5 603., 599.5 614.5 61.5 600 577.0 578.5 593.0 590.5 61o.5 606.5 622.5 616.5 800 583.5 585.0 599.0 598.0 616.5 613.5 628.5 624.5 1I 000 590.0 591.5 W7-0 6.04.5 624.,5 619.5 06.0 631.5 1200O j 596. 5.0 613.0 612.5 629,5 626.0 642.5 638.5 1400 [ 96 0 6l* 612. 5 6,c-9.566. 0-1400 602. 601. 619. 617. 656.0 632. 649.0 645.5 I - Iron-constantan Thermocuple Junction II - Chrolel-Constantm Thermocouple Junction 2

II 6 + IRON-CONSTANTAN THERMOCOUPLE JUNCTION O3'2* C 0 0 CHROMAEL-CONSTANTAN THERMOCOUPLE + JUNCTION 0 i + + 20.22* C 630-+ 0-+ + + 11 0610-0 + 0 + 0 0 +10-23* C + 0 + L]16 1.82" C 0i + 0 + 7 590 0 U 11 o 0 1is1. w U Figure 1 - Experimental Data for the Thermal Conductivity of Standard Sea Water as a Function ef Pressure for Various Teoperaturas g I' 3 N ll,,,, *... ' '"...."'"... :.,,. " :'2

The data reported can be represented as a function of temperature I. and pressure by the equation LI. K = 5.5286 x 10"3 + 3.o1-025 x 10"7 P + 1.8364 x 10-5 T -3.3058 x l0-9 3 (1) where: K = thermal conductivity, watto/cm-deg P = pressure, bars I T = temperature, 0 C. Values generated with this equation are listed in table 2 and LA are depicted graphically in figure 2. The equation yields values which have a standard error of ±1.7 x 10-5 watts/cm-deg, or ±0.28%, from the experimental data. I TABLE 2 - VALLES OF TBE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF STANDARD SEA WATER.. k AS DETERMINED FROM EQUATION (1) Pressure Temperature, C. B Ears 0 10 20 30 Atmosphere 553. 57 1.0 586.5 598.5 -.. 200 559.5 577.5 593.5 605.5 400 566.5 584.5 600. 612.5 600 573.5 591.0 607.0 619. 0 800 580.0 5 98.0 614.0 626.0 111000 587. 0605. 620.5625 1200 593.5 611.5 627.5 639.5 1400 6oo.5 618.5 634.5 646.5 4

I' ~I1 I I I I 650-30" C S20 C U ~630 Llh 9610- LJ2 00 C UI, i ] 590- Ii S 550 0 500 1000 1500 PRESSURE, BARS S Figure 2 - Thermal Conductivity of Standard Sea Water as a Function of Pressure as Determined from Equation 1 at Various Temperatures 15

SJDISCUSSION Investigation of the basic properties of sea water has been neglected for many years. However, with the recent upsurge of interest regarding maximum utilization of all our natural marine resources has emerged the realization that we lack much basic knowledge concerning the properties of sea water for engineering design. These experiments are an excellent case in point. While interest in the thermal conductivity of pure water has attracted 30-odd investigators over the last 50 years, we could not find one zesearcher who developed a similar interest in sea water. L Since there have been no direct measurements of K for sea water, educated guesses about its value were advanced as early as 1907 by Krummel.4 He assumed that thermal diffusivity (the thermal conductivity divided by the product of density and the specific heat) is approximately the same for both fresh water and sea water. Using this proposition, Barrett and Nettleton 6 computed K at 17.50 C for sea water during their compilation for the International Critical Tables. The value they gave for 35 o/oo salinity is 5.58 x 10-5 watts/cm-deg. We obtain a value of 5.83 x 10-5 watts/cm-deg from equation (1). The discrepancy of 4.5%, we believe, can be traced to the invalid assumption previously noted. Currently accepted values are based upon the investigations of Riedel, 8 who compiled a table of molar conductivities for ions in aqueous solution at 200 C and 1 atmosphere. These contributions are utilized with the equation where: KSol + aici X0oI thermal conductivity of the solution ; K% 0 thermal conductivity of water LA 1] ai ci = molar thermal conductivity of the ion = molar concentration of the ion. "-_.......

Using values for the major ions in sea water indicates a decrease in the thermal conductivity on the order of about Sx i0-5 ýatts/cm-deg (for 35L salinity) over that for pure water at atmospheric pressure. Based upon our previously repurted values for pure water, we observe a decrease of from 4.5 to 10.0 x 10-5 watts/cm-deg from 00 to 3 0 * C. Li However, it should be mentioned that the difference between these calculated values and those measured experimentally is J hardly greater than 1% in the worst case. Ilistorical accounts of the effects of pressure on K for sea water are nonexist-nt, even on a theoretical basis. Our results indicate tiiat the thermal conductivity of sea water increpses cnl.y about 80% as fast as does the K for water for a Li similar pressure increase. This is a most unexpected result and might be related tj less rapid increase in density for sea water compared to pure water. L1 CCNCLJS IONS 0 The thermal conductivity of sea water is a direct function of pressure and temperature throughout the range studied. e Curiently accepted values for the thermal conductivity of sea water at atmospheric pressure may not be in L error by more than 1%. U I. The effects of pressure on the thermal condactivity of sea water are less than expected on Le basis of values for fresh water. TECHNICAL REFLRPMCES 1 - Stailey, E. M., and V. J. Castelli, "The T1,jrmal Conductivity of Pure Water and Standard Sea Water as a Function of Presbure and Temperature," NAVSHEPRANDCEN Annapolis Rept 3566, Part I (May 1972) S 2 -Wooster, W. S., et al, Deep Sea Research, Vol. 16, p. 321 (1969) U 3 - Castelli, V. J., and E. M. Stanley, "Thermal Conductivity of Pure Water and Standard Sea Water as a Function of Pressure and Temperature," NAVSHIPRANDCEN Annapolis Rept 3566, Part II (in preparation) 3 7

I 3 Lj. - Krummel, 0., Handbuch Der Oceanographie, Vol. 1, p. 280 (1907) 5 -. Barrett, T., and H. R. Nettleton, International Critical Tables, Vol. 5, p. 229 (1929) 36 Riedel, L., "Die Warmeleitfghigkeit von w*ssrigen L6sungen starker Electrolyte," Chem. Ing. Tech., Vol. 23, pp. 59-64 ii CO 0 Al u. A 1u H8