WIND ENERGY REPORT GERMANY 2013

Similar documents
Results and conclusions of a floating Lidar offshore test

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

Executive Summary of Accuracy for WINDCUBE 200S

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

Increased Project Bankability : Thailand's First Ground-Based LiDAR Wind Measurement Campaign

DIRECTION DEPENDENCY OF OFFSHORE TURBULENCE INTENSITY IN THE GERMAN BIGHT

OFFSHORE CREDENTIALS. Accepted for wind resource assessment onshore and offshore by leading Banks Engineers, globally

The NORCOWE legacy - data and instrumentation

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

FINO1 Mast Correction

3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain

CORRELATION EFFECTS IN THE FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF GROUND BASED REMOTE WIND SENSORS

Wind measurements that reduce electricity prices

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

EMPOWERING OFFSHORE WINDFARMS BY RELIABLE MEASUREMENTS

Offshore Micrositing - Meeting The Challenge

The Offshore Boundary Layer Observatory (OBLO) Possibilities for the offshore wind industry

On- and Offshore Assessment of the ZephIR Wind-LiDAR

7 YEARS METEOMAST AMRUMBANK WEST

Evaluation of wind flow with a nacelle-mounted, continuous wave wind lidar

Carbon Trust Offshore Wind Accelerator. OWA floating LiDAR campaign: Babcock trial at Gwynt Y Môr Copenhagen, 11 March 2015 Megan Smith

REMOTE SENSING APPLICATION in WIND ENERGY

Computational Fluid Dynamics

Hywind. Deep offshore wind operational experience. Finn Gunnar Nielsen, Statoil RDI

Flow analysis with nacellemounted

NORCOWE met-ocean measurement campaigns

Tidal influence on offshore and coastal wind resource predictions at North Sea. Barbara Jimenez 1,2, Bernhard Lange 3, and Detlev Heinemann 1.

can the wind industry bank on wind lidar? November 2014

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

PROJECT CYCLOPS: THE WAY FORWARD IN POWER CURVE MEASUREMENTS?

3D Turbulence at the Offshore Wind Farm Egmond aan Zee J.W. Wagenaar P.J. Eecen

Measurement and simulation of the flow field around a triangular lattice meteorological mast

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

WindProspector TM Lockheed Martin Corporation

WIND INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS

Shorter wind measurement campaigns Re-thinking with LiDAR

Power curves - use of spinner anemometry. Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF GUIDED WAVE TRAVEL TIME TOMOGRAPHY

Windcube FCR measurements

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

CFD development for wind energy aerodynamics

Report on the Research Project OWID Offshore Wind Design Parameter

Measuring power performance with a Wind Iris 4- beam in accordance with EUDP procedure

2. Fachtagung Energiemeteorologie 2011, Bremerhaven SITE ASSESSMENT. WIND TURBINE ASSESSMENT. GRID INTEGRATION. DUE DILIGENCE. KNOWLEDGE.

A Comparison of the UK Offshore Wind Resource from the Marine Data Exchange. P. Argyle, S. J. Watson CREST, Loughborough University, UK

Validation Study of the Lufft Ventus Wind Sensor

TRIAXYS Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Comparison Study

The Wind Resource: Prospecting for Good Sites

PUV Wave Directional Spectra How PUV Wave Analysis Works

Measurement of rotor centre flow direction and turbulence in wind farm environment

Sea State Estimation from an Advancing Ship

Control Strategies for operation of pitch regulated turbines above cut-out wind speeds

3D-simulation of the turbulent wake behind a wind turbine

Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels

E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences

M. Mikkonen.

Strategic Advice about Floating LiDAR Campaigns. Borssele offshore wind farm

10 years of meteorological measurements at FINO1

MOTUS Wave Buoys. Powered By the Aanderaa MOTUS Directional Wave Sensor

Sea state estimation from an advancing ship - The wave buoy analogy Presentation at Skibsteknisk Selskab

EERA DTOC wake results offshore

Scanning lidar measurements of offshore wind turbine wakes. Peter Clive Senior Scientist, SgurrEnergy All Energy, Glasgow

The OWEZ Meteorological Mast

Alstom Ocean Energy Path towards Industrailsation. Ken Street 18 th April 2013

NORCOWE Reference Wind Farm

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

Assessment and Testing of Island Wind Resources without Masts

THE HORNS REV WIND FARM AND THE OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE WIND FARM MAIN CONTROLLER

PERFORMANCE STABILITY OF ZEPHIR IN HIGH MOTION ENVIRONMENTS: FLOATING AND TURBINE MOUNTED

Measuring offshore winds from onshore one lidar or two?

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Remote sensing standards: their current status and significance for offshore projects

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN WIND TURBINE TURBULENCE AND PITCH FAILURE

A NOVEL FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE CONCEPT: NEW DEVELOPMENTS

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

Validation of long-range scanning lidars deployed around the Høvsøre Test Station

July Interim Report. National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) Wind Resource Assessment & Offshore Unit Chennai, India.

Rotor Average wind speed for power curve performance. Ioannis Antoniou (LAC), Jochen Cleve (LAC), Apostolos Piperas (LAC)

Reliable, accurate groundwater Diver dataloggers and software. Diver-Suite

BOTTOM MAPPING WITH EM1002 /EM300 /TOPAS Calibration of the Simrad EM300 and EM1002 Multibeam Echo Sounders in the Langryggene calibration area.

Windar Photonics Wind Sensor. Great at Control

VALIDATION OF WIND SPEED DISTURBANCES TO CUPS AT THE METEORLOCICAL MAST ON THE OFFSHORE PLATFORM FINO1 USING WIND-LIDAR MEASUREMENTS.

MULTI-WTG PERFORMANCE OFFSHORE, USING A SINGLE SCANNING DOPPLER LIDAR

Comparison of flow models

Modelling of Wind Turbine Loads nearby a Wind Farm

Offshore wind power in the Baltic sea

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Spectral analysis of wind turbulence measured by a Doppler Lidar for velocity fine structure and coherence studies

LiDAR Application to resource assessment and turbine control

RESOLUTION MSC.94(72) (adopted on 22 May 2000) PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT FOR HIGH-SPEED CRAFT (HSC)

Design of a Microcontroller-Based Pitch Angle Controller for a Wind Powered Generator

Investigating Wind Flow properties in Complex Terrain using 3 Lidars and a Meteorological Mast. Dimitri Foussekis

TESTING AND CALIBRATION OF VARIOUS LiDAR REMOTE SENSING DEVICES FOR A 2 YEAR OFFSHORE WIND MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGN

Fukushima Floating Offshore Wind Farm Demonstration Project ( Fukushima FORWARD )

LIDAR Correlation to Extreme Flapwise Moment : Gust Impact Prediction Time and Feedforward Control

ZIPWAKE DYNAMIC TRIM CONTROL SYSTEM OUTLINE OF OPERATING PRINCIPLES BEHIND THE AUTOMATIC MOTION CONTROL FEATURES

GL GH Offshore Wind Measurements

Transcription:

FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR WIND ENERGY AND SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY IWES WIND ENERGY REPORT GERMANY 2013 FRAUNHOFER VERLAG

Publisher: Dr. Kurt Rohrig Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology (IWES) Division Energy Economy and Grid Operation Königstor 59 34119 Kassel Germany E-Mail: windmonitor@iwes.fraunhofer.de www.iwes.fraunhofer.de Editorial team: Volker Berkhout, Stefan Faulstich, Philip Görg, Berthold Hahn, Katrin Linke, Moritz Neuschäfer, Sebastian Pfaffel, Khalid Raik, Dr. Kurt Rohrig, Renate Rothkegel, Mark Zieße Cover photo acknowledgment: BARD rotor blades BARD-Gruppe Copyright: All rights to reprint, use imagers, reproduce in a photo mechanical or similar way and to save information in data processing systems remains the right of the Fraunhofer IWES and their employers.

Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology (IWES) WIND ENERGY REPORT GERMANY 2013

WIND ENERGY REPORT GERMANY 2013 98

Special Report FLOATING-LIDAR SYSTEM Julia Gottschall, Gerrit Wolken-Möhlmann, Thomas Viergutz, Claudia Rudolph, Bernhard Lange Introduction A general challenge for offshore wind resource assessments is the lack of suitable data for prospecting purposes. Offshore meteorological (met.) masts at future wind farm sites are scarce, and if new masts are erected, they pose a signiicant capital and logistical commitment for the developers. Moreover, the installed masts rarely reach the hub heights of future offshore WTs, which results in additional uncertainties when vertically extrapolating the mast measurements. In this connection, loating lidars represent a cost-effective alternative to an offshore met. mast, lowering irst of all the CAPEX of the project. Additional beneits are a shorter process of approving in terms of lower requirements for a corresponding marine licence application, a signiicantly smaller disturbance of the environment, and a greater lexibility of the system enabling a deployment at different locations. The development of suitable and for an application in the offshore wind industry optimized loating-lidar systems has made considerable progress during the last few years, and has resulted in realisations that vary not only in the adapted lidar and buoy technologies but also in the used concepts for installation or data handling, and in particular the consideration of motion effects on the recorded data. R&D project Offshore Messboje Fraunhofer IWES has been engaged in the development of loating-lidar concepts since 2009. An own correction algorithm for motion compensation was developed and tested both in simulations and irst onshore motion tests. In 2011 the R&D project Offshore Messboje was granted by the BMU (Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety) within that an own and novel loating-lidar system, were to be designed, built and tested. A (buoy-based) loating lidar system is here deined as a lidar device integrated in or installed on top of a buoy. The offshore environment corresponds to a major challenge to the lidar instrument but also to the complete system: the harshness of the environment sets requirements on all system components, its non-stability (with changing water depths, wave conditions and ocean currents) requires a certain adaptability, and the limited access affects the availability, and inally also the reliability, of the system. Power supply may be a critical issue, and needs to be ensured by a technically mature approach similarly as data storage and communication. The prototype of the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy was completed in May 2013, and as a start tested in the inner harbour near the Fraunhofer IWES buildings in Bremerhaven for a couple of weeks. The inal performance of the system was veriied in an offshore test next to the met. mast FINO1 in the German North Sea from August to October 2013. After concluding the test campaign, the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy was introduced and presented to the offshore wind industry at the EWEA Offshore event in Frankfurt in November, and the project was successfully completed by the end of the year 2013. Furthermore, the quality of the lidar measurements in terms of accuracy and precision is affected by the motion of the buoy. Platform-typical motions, including up to six degrees of freedom, may cause systematic measurement errors, appearing e.g. as a wrong projection of the wind velocity vector, a confused wind direction measurement, added velocity components, increased lidar turbulence intensity or a wrong measurement height. Wind Lidar Buoy next to FINO1 met. mast 99 Caspar Sessler, Fraunhofer IWES

WIND ENERGY REPORT GERMANY 2013 Technical speciications of the system The Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy see igure 1 for pictures from the irst offshore trial is a loating-lidar system integrating a Windcube v2 lidar device in an adapted marine buoy. The basic components of the system are: the body of the buoy with an overall height of 7.2 m, a diameter of 2.55 m, and a weight of 4.7 t, that is designed according to the dimensions of a standard Leuchtfeuertonne (LT81); the lidar device, measuring the wind vector for up to 12 range gates between 40 m and approximately 250 m with a data sampling rate of 0.7 s, in a custom-made housing; an autonomous power system based on three micro-wts, PV panels and AGM batteries for energy storage; a data transfer protocol comprising a wireless connection (with a range of up to 300 m) for data transfer and a satellite connection for the transfer of selected status data and alarms; the integration of additional sensors as e.g. motion sensors, a weather station for measuring different meteorological parameters and a bottom-based AWAC current meter for measuring waves and currents. The correction of the recorded lidar data, using the simultaneously measured data from a satellite compass and an AHRS (Attitude Heading Reference System), was implemented as part of the post-processing of the data. Figure 1: Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy before and during its irst offshore trial. (Photographs: Caspar Sessler, Fraunhofer IWES) ) Offshore test next to FINO1 The performance of the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy was tested in a nine-weeks offshore measurement campaign in an environment that is representative for the later application next to the research platform FINO1 located in the German North Sea about 45 km to the north of the East Frisian island Borkum. The water depth at the location is approximately 30 m. The prevailing wind direction is South-West. The direction of the sea currents is governed by the prevailing tide. 100

Special Report Floating-Lidar-Systeme The Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy was installed on 2 August 2013 at the location N 54 01.00 E 6 34.89, i.e. north-west of the met. mast in a distance of about 450 m. The bottom-based AWAC system, recording in parallel the prevailing sea conditions, was installed during the irst visit for inspection on 28 August 2013 at the location N 54 00.99 E 6 34.63. Both systems were recovered according to plan on 6 October 2013. The status of the loating-lidar system during the offshore trial was monitored on the basis of the satellite messages that were transmitted every two hours, and included data on the amount of available stored energy (voltages from the three battery banks, one attached to each micro-wts as essential energy generators) and a few additional signals indicating the operability of the system. Figure 2 shows the transmitted voltage data in relation to the prevailing wind conditions, reference wind speed at 40 m height measured at the FINO1 met mast. The battery voltages clearly go up and down with the changing wind speed but never reach their pre-deined minimum level, ensuring the operation of the loating-lidar system for the complete test period. For an assessment of the accuracy and precision of the loating-lidar wind measurements, recorded 10-min-mean horizontal wind speeds were compared with the corresponding reference values from the mast, measured by cup anemometers at the same height see igure 3 for the data measured at 100 m height. The relevant valid measurement sector had to be reduced due to signiicant mast effects to the wind direction range 280 to 350, all other data were iltered out. A linear regression of the remaining data shows a very good correlation, similar to the results of an onshore lidar-mast comparison, where no additional motions affect the measurements and the distance between mast and lidar device is typically only a few meters. Battery voltage [V] Reference wind speed (40 m) [m/s] Lidar wind spped [m/s] 32 30 28 26 24 25/07 04/08 14/08 24/08 03/09 13/09 23/09 03/10 13/10 Date [2013] 20 15 10 0 25/07 04/08 14/08 24/08 03/09 13/09 23/09 03/10 13/10 Date [2013] 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 5 Ampair Silentwind D400 Figure 2: Transmitted status data (voltages of battery banks assigned to micro-wts) during offshore test next to FINO1, in relation to reference wind conditions. y = 0.034 + 1.003 x R² = 0.996 # Data: 1,756 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Reference wind speed [m/s] Figure 3: Correlation between measured 10-min mean wind speeds from loating-lidar device and reference cup anemometers at 100 m measurement height. 101

WIND ENERGY REPORT GERMANY 2013 1.5 Lidar wind spped - reference wind speed [m/s] Lidar turbulence intensity reference turbulence intensity [ ] 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 1 2 3 4 Significant wave height [m] 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0 1 2 3 4 Significant wave height [m] Figure 4: Deviation in measured (a) 10-min-mean wind speeds and (b) TI values from loating lidar and cup anemometer versus simultaneously recorded (30-min-mean) signiicant wave height for 100 m measurement height. In igure 4a the same data are shown, this time as a difference lidar wind speed minus reference mast wind speed, in relation to the simultaneously recorded signiicant wave height. Wave data were recorded as 30-min-mean data and assigned to the respective 10-min-mean wind data. The plot shows no trend or signiicant dependence of the measured mean wind speeds from the loating-lidar system on the prevailing wave conditions. Though signiicant wave heights, averaged over 30 min, of up to 3.5 m do not correspond to severe winter storms, the results deinitely give a positive and promising indication. Figure 4b shows the recorded difference in Turbulence Intensity (TI) between lidar and reference mast measurements again in relation to the prevailing signiicant wave heights. This time a clear trend, depicting a larger positive deviation of the lidar values from the reference for higher wave heights, is visible for the uncorrected loating-lidar data. This signiicant inluence of the sea conditions can be compensated by applying the motion correction algorithm developed by Fraunhofer IWES. Figure 5 shows the correlation between lidar and reference TI for different stages of motion compensation, including different sets of degrees of freedom. The correction that considered the most detailed information on the motions of the system gives the best results and a correlation that is more than acceptable for a lidar-mast comparison in terms of turbulence. Best practices for the application of loating-lidar systems As loating-lidar systems become more and more interesting for the offshore wind industry holding out the prospect of less expensive offshore wind measurements, more accurate and precise wind resource assessments and better yield estimations resulting in beneits with respect to the inancing of offshore wind projects there is a need for best practices and more detailed protocols for the application of the technology. In 2012, as part of the IEA Wind Task 32 on Wind Lidar Systems 102

Special Report Floating-Lidar-Systeme for Wind Energy Deployment, a working group was formed to collect experiences that are made with the technology and their application, and prepare a irst version of a Recommended Practices document by the end of 2014. The working group consists of or is supported by basically all relevant players on the market for loating-lidar applications and is coordinated by Fraunhofer IWES. In parallel, the Carbon Trust together with the partners of the Offshore Wind Accelerator have developed a roadmap for the commercial acceptance of loating LIDAR technology that was for the irst time published in November 2013. The two working groups are collaborating to a certain level and exchange information regularly. Conclusions The Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy is a loating-lidar system integrating a Windcube v2 pulsed lidar device in an adapted marine buoy. The concept of the system was developed within the BMU-funded R&D project Offshore Messboje. A irst prototype was completed in 2013 and tested in an offshore test next to the FINO1 met. mast from August to October. lidar turbulence intensity [ ] 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 No correction Method c1 Method c2 Method c3h 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 Reference turbulence intensity [ ] Figure 5: Correlation between measured Turbulence Intensity (TI) from loating lidar and reference cup anemometers at 100 m measurement height for different correction approaches. Method c1 only considers the recorded yaw angles for the correction of the lidar data, c2 additionally the horizontal tilt angles, i.e. roll and pitch, and c3h in additon the heave of the buoy. The results of the nine-weeks test show a very good correlation for the recorded mean wind speeds for the loating-lidar device with the met mast data. Measured turbulence intensities are signiicantly inluenced by the system motions, the effects can be corrected for with the motion-correction algorithm developed by Fraunhofer IWES however. Floating- lidar is a promising technology for the offshore wind industry, with the potential of saving signiicant costs in the project development and planning phase, and the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy was proven to be a suitable concept for this task meeting the requirements of a high data accuracy and a good system availability offshore. 103

Fraunhofer IWES Kassel Königstor 59 34119 Kassel / Germany Tel.: 0561 7294-0 Fax: 0561 7294-100 Fraunhofer IWES Bremerhaven Am Seedeich 45 27572 Bremerhaven / Germany Tel.: 0471 9026 29-0 Fax: 0471 9026 29-19 info@iwes.fraunhofer.de www.iwes.fraunhofer.de Funded: Supervised by: on the base of an act of the German Parliament