UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY

Similar documents
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO B WABASHA STREET SOUTH BOUND (MASA 235 SB)

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 1 PINE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 9 OVER THE BLUE EARTH RIVER DISTRICT 7 - BLUE EARTH COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO OVER THE STRAIGHT RIVER DISTRICT 6 - RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 101 OVER THE MINNESOTA RIVER DISTRICT 8 - REDWOOD COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 4 OVER THE BEAVER RIVER ST. LOUIS COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO MSAS 123 (2 ND AVE. SW) OVER THE CANNON RIVER CITY OF FARIBAULT, RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 7 OVER THE SNAKE RIVER DISTRICT 1 - PINE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 133 OVER A DITCH ST. LOUIS COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

UNDERWATER INSPECTION REPORT DOUBLE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERT HAWTHORN ROAD OVER RICE CREEK (PELKEY LAKE) MORRISON COUNTY

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 10 over POMME DE TERRE RIVER. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/18/2016. County Highway Agency

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. 81(ENCHANTED LANE) over CHANNEL. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 09/07/2016

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CR 52 over CALDWELL BROOK. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/04/2016. County Highway Agency

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 14 over BUTLER CREEK. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/21/2016. County Highway Agency

Underwater Inspection of Bridges Overview of a Statewide Program

Summary of HEC 18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges FHWA NHI Should really follow HEC 18, but this summary will get you the main points.

FLAGLER BEACH PIER POST INCIDENT SAFETY INSPECTION HURRICANE IRMA SEPTEMBER 15-17, 2017

State DOT - Bridge Inspection Manual Part II Course No. SE0117 PDH: 10

INFILTRATION PRACTICE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION FORM

PED (OLD TWNS RD) over OTTER TAIL RIVER

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

Bridge Failures in Alberta

High Definition Laser Scanning (HDS) Underwater Acoustic Imaging and Profiling

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

As temporary grade control facilities along waterways until final stabilization is established.

Components of a Barrage

Culvert Safety Inspection Report

The Dalles Dam Powerhouse Trash Rack ROV Inspection Report

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

PROPOSING A NEW PORTABLE DEVICE FOR BRIDGE SCOUR INSPECTION

COASTAL HAZARDS. What are Coastal Hazards?

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

Information for File # SEW

Cranes Roost Park Facility Analysis

Gerald P. Oliveto, P.E. George Franz NJDOT

The Challenge of Wave Scouring Design for the Confederation Bridge

Earthen Embankments. turning into larger, more costly repairs. The following. The State Dam Safety Program has inspection

Lecture 10 : Sewer Appurtenances

Whitewater Valley Station Surface Impoundment Coal Combustion Residual Annual Report

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 002 EMORANNO. 001

Chadbourne Dam Repair and Fish Barrier

TYPES OF FOUNDATION. Superstructure. Substructure. Foundation

Suitable Applications Check dams may be appropriate in the following situations: To promote sedimentation behind the dam.

Storm Damage Floating Culverts & Other Inlet Issues

CHAPTER 8 STAKING SIGNALS AND LIGHTING FIELD GUIDE. 8.1 Staking Traffic Control Signal Systems

PENNDRAIN.rep. HEC-RAS Version May 2005 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California

We re good at what we do! Anywhere, TX SITE

Guidelines for Underwater Inspection and Imaging of Railroad Bridges

WASHINGTON CONSERVATION DISTRICT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (S.O.P.)

Structural Assessment. USS Yorktown CV-10

MIRABAY PILOT PROJECT REPORT

Great Lakes Stream Crossing Inventory Instructions

CLEANING, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF SEWERS

Existing conditions of each bridge and repair plan are presented in Table

Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 1 / 6 Spring 2012 updated 1/27/2012

CE 535, Spring 2002 Preliminary Design Example 1 / 6

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 52/P UNDERWATER INSPECTION OF MOBILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNITS IN LIEU OF DRYDOCKING

ITEM 400 STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL

Outlet Structures T-12

CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT

VWP CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT. Project Name: Berkmar Drive Extension Locality: Albemarle County Inspector: ERM

EPA R6 Dive Team Operations Report. San Jacinto Waste Pits Channelview, TX December 9-10, 2015

3. Types of foundation

Item 404 Driving Piling

Perched Box Caisson Overview. January 2014

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX B TIDEROUT 2 USERS MANUAL

Getting a. Bridge Built

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Angela Lane, Lowe Environmental Impact / Karen Akuhata (WDC) The Wairoa wastewater treatment system requires a replacement consent by May 2019.

Bids DECEMBER 21, 2018 AT 2:00 P.M. (EASTERN) (Estimated Cost: $4,700,000.00)

APPENDIX K CULVERT INSPECTION MEMO

Illinois State Water Survey

Washington State Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects. Casey Kramer, PE WSDOT State Hydraulics Engineer

Kennedy Bridge - Summary of Pier 6 Movement Records

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS

Green CCR Surface Impoundment

ONTARIO REGULATION 239/02 MUNICIPAL ACT MINIMUM MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAYS

13 June Guy Bridges Aecom Asia

FISH PASSAGE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ON PENNYPACK CREEK AT VERREE ROAD DAM AND ROOSEVELT BOULEVARD DAM PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

SITE S7: EMBANKMENT FAILURE WEST OF MILLARVILLE

APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA FOR CULVERTS

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

2012 Susitna River Water Temperature and Meteorological Field Study

TCML operate and control the 146 Km Railway line from Lake Magadi to Konza.

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

Lateral Load Analysis Considering Soil-Structure Interaction. ANDREW DAUMUELLER, PE, Ph.D.

TAO Safety Policy No. HS-5.1 Page 1 of 15 Revision No. 2 Revision Date: July 19, 2005

ABC D BC ecision Ma ion trix

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

RLRC COMMUNITIES EAST GRAND FORKS AREA CHARACTER THE RED LAKE RIVER & THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH CONFLUENCE EAGLE POINT BOAT LAUNCH DESIGN

TOP:001.3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service TECHNICAL OPERATING PROCEDURE

Underwater repair for bridge

Transcription:

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 02545 CR NO. 116 OVER THE RUM RIVER METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY SEPTEMBER 9, 2012 PREPARED FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY COLLINS ENGINEERS, INC. AND WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. JOB NO. 2107

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT SUMMARY: The substructure units inspected at Bridge No. 02545, Piers 1 through 3, were found to be in good condition with no defects of structural significance observed. The channel bottom in most instances appeared stable. A small portion of the footing at Pier 1 was exposed. A light accumulation of debris extended some distance downstream from around the upstream nose of Pier 3. INSPECTION FINDINGS: (A) A light accumulation of 18 inch diameter and smaller timber debris was observed starting 5 feet downstream of the upstream nose on the east side and extended around the nose to 20 feet downstream along the west face of Pier 3. (B) The top of footing was exposed 4.2 feet below the waterline for 15 feet along the east face of Pier 1 with up to 4 inches of vertical exposure. (C) Overall the concrete was observed to be in good and sound condition. Also, the channel bottom was found to be stable and consisted of sandy gravel with up to 1 foot of probe rod penetration.

RECOMMENDATIONS: (A) Monitor the footing exposure and drift accumulation during future underwater inspections. (B) Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of sixty (60) months. Inspection Team Leader:

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION 1. BRIDGE DATA Bridge Number: 02545 Feature Crossed: The Rum River Feature Carried: CR No. 116 Location: Metro District - Anoka County Bridge Description: The superstructure consists of a four span concrete beam structure supported by two concrete abutments on piles and three concrete piers on piles, numbered 1 to 3 starting from the west. 2. INSPECTION DATA Professional Engineer/Team Leader: Barritt Lovelace, P.E. Dive Team: Brad Robinson (WSB), Lukas Janulis (Collins) Date: September 9, 2012 Weather Conditions: Sunny, 65 F Underwater Visibility: 1 foot Waterway Velocity: None/Negligible

3. SUBSTRUCTURE INSPECTION DATA Substructure Inspected: Piers 1 through 3. General Shape: The pier shafts are rectangular with flat noses. The piers are supported by rectangular footings founded on piles. Maximum Water Depth at Substructure Inspected: Approximately 5.4 feet. 4. WATERLINE DATUM Water Level Reference: The top of the pier cap on the upstream end of Pier 1. Water Surface: The waterline was approximately 12.7 feet below reference. Waterline Elevation = 844.7 5. NBIS CODING INFORMATION (Minnesota specific codes are used for 92B and 113) Item 60: Substructure: Code 7 Item 61: Channel and Channel Protection: Code 7 Item 92B: Underwater Inspection: Code B/09/12 Item 113: Scour Critical Bridges: Code I/92 Bridge is scour critical because abutment or pier foundation is rated as unstable due to observed scour at bridge site. Yes X No

6. STRUCTURAL ELEMENT CONDITION RATING: Item # Element Description Quantity Unit Conditions 1 2 3 4 5 210 Concrete Pier Wall 259 LF 259 985 Slopes 1 EA 1

Photograph 1. Overall View of the Structure, Looking East. Photograph 2. View of Pier 1, Looking East.

Photograph 3. View of Pier 2, Looking East. Photograph 4. View of Pier 3, Looking West.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES DAILY DIVING REPORT INSPECTORS: WSB & Associates and Collins Engineers DATE: September 9, 2012 ON-SITE TEAM LEADER: Barritt Lovelace, P.E. BRIDGE NO: 02545 WEATHER: Sunny, 65 F WATERWAY CROSSED: The Rum River DIVING OPERATION: X SCUBA SURFACE SUPPLIED AIR OTHER PERSONNEL: Brad Robinson (WSB), Lukas Janulis (Collins) EQUIPMENT: Commercial Scuba, Sounding Pole, Camera, u/w Light, Scraper, Probe Rod TIME IN WATER: 5:40 P.M. TIME OUT OF WATER: 6:05 P.M WATERWAY DATA: VELOCITY None/Negligible VISIBILITY 1 foot DEPTH 5.4 feet maximum at Pier 3. ELEMENTS INSPECTED: Piers 1, 2 and 3 REMARKS: Overall, the concrete was in good, sound condition with no structurally significant defects observed. Several hairline vertical cracks were observed on Piers 1, 2 and 3. The top of footing was exposed at 4.2 feet below the waterline from the downstream nose to 15 feet upstream of the downstream nose along the east face of Pier 1 with up to 4 inches of vertical exposure. A light accumulation of timber debris extended from 5 feet downstream of the upstream nose on the east face, around the upstream nose, to 20 feet downstream of the upstream nose along the west face of Pier 3. FURTHER ACTION NEEDED: YES X NO Monitor footing exposure and timber drift accumulations during future underwater inspections. Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of sixty (60) months.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES UNDERWATER INSPECTION CONDITION RATING FORM BRIDGE NO. 02545 INSPECTION DATE September 9, 2012 INSPECTORS WSB & Associates and Collins Engineers, Inc. NOTE: USE ALL APPLICABLE CONDITION ON-SITE TEAM LEADER Barritt Lovelace, P.E. DEFINITIONS AS DEFINED IN THE MINNESOTA WATERWAY CROSSED Rum River RECORDING AND CODING GUIDE INCLUDING GENERAL, SUBSTRUCTURE, CHANNEL AND PROTECTION, AND CULVERTS AND WALL DEFINITIONS TO COMPLETE THIS FORM. CONDITION RATING SUBSTRUCTURE CHANNEL GENERAL UNIT REFERENCE NO. MAXIMUM DEPTH OF WATER PILING COLUMNS, SHAFTS, OR FACES* FOOTINGS DISPLACEMENT OTHER OVERALL SUBSTRUCTURE CONDITION CODE* SCOUR EMBANKMENT EROSION EMBANKMENT PROTECTION OTHER (DRIFT/DEBRIS) OVERALL CHANNEL & PROTECTION CONDITION CONCRETE STEEL TIMBER LOSS OF SECTION PREVIOUS REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OTHER UNIT DESCRIPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Pier 1 4.2 N 7 7 8 N 7 6 N 7 N 7 7 N N N N N Pier 2 N N 7 N 8 N 7 8 N N 7 7 7 N N N N N Pier 3 5.4 N 7 N 8 N 7 7 N 7 7 7 7 N N N N N *UNDERWATER PORTION ONLY REMARKS: Overall, the concrete was in good, sound condition with no structurally significant defects observed. Several hairline vertical cracks were observed on Piers 1, 2 and 3. The top of footing was exposed at 4.2 feet below the waterline from the downstream nose to 15 feet upstream of the downstream nose along the east face of Pier 1 with up to 4 inches of vertical exposure. A light accumulation of timber debris extended from 5 feet downstream of the upstream nose on the east face, around the upstream nose, to 20 feet downstream of the upstream nose along the west face of Pier 3. NOTES: ATTACH SKETCHES AS NEEDED, IDENTIFY REMARK BY REFERRING TO UNIT REFERENCE NO. AND REMARK NO. USE GENERAL SECTION TO IDENTIFY OVERALL PRESENCE OF SPALLS, CRACKS, CORROSION, ETC.