ILLINOJ PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

Similar documents
Summary of the 2012 Off-Reservation Treaty Waterfowl Season

ILLINO PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

WEBLESS MIGRATORY GAME BIRD AND WATERFOWL SEASONS. DOVE (Mourning, White-winged and Eurasian Collared) SORA AND VIRGINIA RAIL

Minnesota Waterfowl Migration and Hunting Report 10 October 2013

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. November 13-16, 2017

The 2005 Waterfowl Hunting Season in Minnesota: A Study of Hunters Opinions and Activities. White-winged scoter. Final Report

2018 Season Waterfowl Hunter Survey Summary. Presented by Josh Richardson, Sr. Biologist Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation

We are looking forward to another successful season in 2017 and we will again be requiring the following:

Minnesota Waterfowl Migration and Hunting Report, Nov. 16, 2017

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. January 24-28, 2019

I LLINOI PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

Summary report on all harvested species on Patuxent Research Refuge from September 1 - January 31, 2017 Deer Harvest

Rainy Lake Open-water Creel Survey:

Minnesota Waterfowl Migration and Hunting Report 25 October 2007

Digest of Waterfowl Hunting Regulations

Minnesota Waterfowl Migration and Hunting Report 29 September 2011

Proposed Upland Game Bird Regulations

Proposed Upland Game Bird Regulations

Analysis of the 1948, 1949, and 1950 Waterfowl Kill Samples in Iowa

STATUS OF WILDLIFE POPULATIONS, FALL 2008

Waterfowl Regulatory Process. Waterfowl regulatory process. Prairie Pothole Region. Tim White TWRA State Waterfowl Biologist

I LLINOJ S PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

JOB REPORT. R.P. Hofstetter Marine Biologist. Survey of the Abundance and Condition of Market Oysters

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. December 18-23, 2018

I LLINOI S PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

Status and Distribution of the Bobcat (Lynx rufus) in Illinois

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Minnesota Waterfowl Migration and Hunting Report 11 October 2007

A pheasant researcher notebook:

by Jason Abraham SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2005

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Minnesota Waterfowl Migration and Hunting Report 27 September 2012

2012 Emiquon Duck Hunting

Alberta Conservation Association 2011/12 Project Summary Report. Velma Hudson, Julie Landry-DeBoer, Jim Potter, Amanda Rezansoff and Ken Wright

Digest of Waterfowl Hunting Regulations. Best of Show 2008 Federal Junior Duck Stamp Contest

Proposals to Modernize Canada s Migratory Birds Regulations to Improve Management of Hunting Bait Restrictions

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

Acknowledgements Frank C. Bellrose & Daniel Holm

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY

Summary of National Hunting Regulations: United Kingdom

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 152

Stony Creek Creel Census

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

Internet Use Among Illinois Hunters: A Ten Year Comparison

Deer Management Unit 252

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

2014 Forest Grouse Parts Collection Summary

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

PROCEDURE MANUAL of 6. Moose Harvest Management. This Procedure Replaces: None

2013 Forest Grouse Parts Collection Summary

ODNR Division of Wildlife Proposed OAC Rule Changes (Effective )

Public Consultation Document

1501: Seasons and limits on ducks, brant, geese, mergansers, and coots.

HUNTING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

2007 South Carolina. South Carolina department of natural resources. Submitted by Charles Ruth; Project Supervisor

Hunter use of public-access lands in the Rainwater Basin and beyond

TRENDS IN PARTICIPATION RATES FOR WILDLIFE-ASSOCIATED RECREATION BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND GENDER:

564 vz,d, Sex Ratios in Ducks

The Department's Upland Game Bird Specialist Tests Your Knowledge Of the Wily Ring-Neck

GAME BIRD PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS FOR UPLAND and MIGRATORY GAME BIRD SEASONS

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

2008 WMU 106 mule deer

The Migratory Gamebird Regulatory Process. Early Waterfowling. Tim White TWRA Migratory GameBird/WMA Program Coordinator

THIEF LAKE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA NEWSLETTER

This page intentionally blank

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Justification for Rainbow Trout stocking reduction in Lake Taneycomo. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation

Summary of a Three-Year Creel Census on Lake Eucha and Spavinaw Lake, Oklahoma, With Comparisons of Other Oklahoma Reservoirs l

2001 Illinois Light Goose Conservation Action Survey Report

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

DEER HUNT RESULTS ON ALABAMA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ANNUAL REPORT, CHRISTOPHER W. COOK STUDY LEADER MAY, 2006

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

RESTORING MINNESOTA S WETLAND AND WATERFOWL HUNTING HERITAGE

Results from the 2012 Quail Action Plan Landowner Survey

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

2015 Forest Grouse Parts Collection Summary

Banded birds Hunters can report recovery of banded birds by calling BAND (2263).

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Lead Ammunition Survey Summary

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE RECOMMENDATIONS ON ADDITIONAL WINTER-RUN PROTECTIONS IN 2016 OCEAN FISHERIES

U.S MINT STATE DUCKS SALE

The Forty-Fourth Annual Maryland Migratory Game Bird Stamp Design Contest for

2015 Winnebago System Walleye Report

Sheepshead Fishery Overview South Atlantic State/Federal Management Board May 2014 Introduction Life History Landings

Final Environmental Assessment Zones and Split Seasons for Duck Hunting

In each summer issue of Lake

Spring 2012 Wild Turkey Harvest Report

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Transcription:

LLNOJ S UNVERSTY OF LLNOS AT URBANA-CHAMPAGN _ PRODUCTON NOTE University of llinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 27.

~4$ ~ llinois Department of Conservation Division of Wildlife Resources MGRATORY BRD SECTON PERODC REPORT NO. 7 April 15, 1974 WATERFOWL HARVEST AND HUNTER USE AT CARLYLE LAKE DURNG THE 1973 SEASON NATURALHRSTORYSUR.y David D. Kennedy, Watertowi Biologist Paul Moore, District Wildlife Manager George C. Arthur, Chief Migratory Bird Section AUG 26 1976 Abstract: Car counts and random bag checks at Carlyle Lake during the 1973 waterfowl season indicated that 8,268 hunters harvested 5,639 ducks for an average of.68 birds per trip. Mild weather, poor food conditions and reduced duck populations resulted in low duck use. A peak of 8, birds was recorded on December 1th. Hunters, harvest and success for each major hunting area were: subimpoundment - 4,143 hunters, 3,63 ducks and.87 success ratio; flooded dead timber - 3,345 hunters, 1,635 ducks and.49 success ratio; open water area - 78 hunters, 41 ducks and.51 success ratio. An early season opening, mild weather and a shortage of other targets shifted considerable pressure onto the wood duck which made up 21 percent of the total bag. Mallards were 51 percent of the bag and other puddle duck species comprised 24 percent. LBRARY NTRODUCTON This report covers hunter use and harvest during the second year of an intensive study of the Carlyle Lake Wildlife Management Area. n 1973 Periodic Reports, Numbers One and Four (Kennedy and Arthur, 1973a,b) respectively considered use and harvest during 1972 and opinion surveys of hunter regulation methods. Data presented allows for comparison of 1972 when food crops and waterfowl use were abundant and 1973 when flooding prohibited row cropping and duck use dropped. This is particularly important due to the recent concern over "shortstopping" by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife and other states. Appreciation is due Merrill Collins, Jack Golden, Darrel Sims, John Schlacter, Floyd Kringer, Alan Guy and Paul Willms. METHODS AND MATERALS Hunter use was determined by driving to all or slightly after the opening of shooting hours. access point. The number of hunters per car was checks. access points on the lake at Cars were recorded for each determined ae the time of bag On the subimpoundment and the flooded dead timber areas, access points were randomly selected for bag checks each day. At the access points each hunter was THE LBRAR1YQB. 1. 1976 UNVERSlT OF LLOS;

-2- checked for number and kinds of ducks harvested. No bag checks were made in the open water areas. t was considered to have the same hunter success ratios as the flooded dead timber areas. Hunter use figures were estimated daily from the average number of hunters per car multiplied by the number of cars. Harvest figures were projected directly from success ratios and hunter numbers for each of the three areas. Three waterfowl inventories were made during the fall. High fire danger claimed priority use of the aircraft during November and no counts were made. RESULTS AND DSCUSSON For ease in discussion the results are broken into four sections: pressure, hunter success, harvest, and species composition. hunting Hunting Pressure The total number of hunters using Carlyle Lake during the 1973 waterfowl season was 8,268 (Table 1). This is approximately a 12 percent decrease from 1972. The subimpoundment attracted the heaviest use with 5 percent or 4,143 of the total hunter efforts. The flooded dead timber accounted for 4 percent of the use and the open water had nine percent (Table 1). These use figures for the three areas represents a slight shift from the use in 1972 (Kennedy and Arthur, 1973a). The flooded dead timber use dropped 9 hunter days while the subimpoundment use remained unchanged. Use in the open water dropped by 2 trips. This drop in usage is probably related to the poorer success discussed in a following section. The Tamalco access to the flooded dead timber area continues to receive greatest use of all hunting access points accounting for 26 percent or 2,15 hunter use days. Within the subimpoundment access points there was a drop at parking lot number two of 2 hunter trips from 1972 to 1973. An increase of about 2 was recorded at Cox's Bridge. This shift was attributed to road construction on secondary roads leading to parking lot number two which made access all but impossible during the wet periods. Hunting was heavy the first three weekends of the season and was markedly reduced the last three weekends. Weekday pressure was fairly constant throughout the season at about 1 hunters per day (Fig. 1). The flooded dead timber and subimpoundment use reflects basically the same patterns (Fig. 2). An extremely mild fall was not conducive to high expectations for waterfowl hunters and hunting pressure was light. Warm weather tended to delay migration. t also resulted in less local movement of birds due to lower energy requirements and less food intake. These factors reduce harvest success and consequently hunting pressure. Hunter Success The average success per hunter trip at Carlyle was.68 (Table 1). Success on the subimpoundment was.87, somewhat better than the.8 recorded in 1972.

-3- The flooded dead timber success was.49 a significant drop from the.82 successof 1972. Success rates for the entire area are found in Figure 3 and a comparison between the flooded dead timber and the subimpoundment success is in Figure 4. n 1972 when overall success was.84 the best period of sustained good hunting was for seven days the last of November and early December (Kennedy and Arthur, 1973a). This season there were two good periods, but of shorter duration (Fig. 3). The first period of four days was from October 24th through the 27th and the second period of three days was from October 31st through November 2nd. The shift in hunting pressure between the access points from 1972 to 1973 was apparently the result of poor success (Table 1). n the sub impoundment, success at lots one, two and three was basically the same as in 1972. Cox's Bridge went from.64 in 1972 to.91 in 1973, thus accounting for the increase in use. The Tamalco access into the flooded dead timber area recorded a success of.98 in 1972 but dropped to.48 in 1973 losing 5 hunter trips between the two years. Harvest The total duck harvest in all areas was 5,639 (Table 1). This represents a decrease of 27 percent from 1972 and reflects a number of factors. First, the waterfowl fall flight was expected to decline by a comparable percentage. Secondly, an extremely mild fall tended to shift migration patterns and hold many mallards further north than normal. Third, spring flooding prohibited the planting of millets and sorghums as in 1972. Consequently the area was not as attractive as in 1972. n 1973 approximately 24, birds were present at Carlyle during 1 days of the season. This year, although inventories were not sufficient, there was a notable reduction in birds (Fig. 7). The peak inventory recorded for 1973 was 8, birds. Although harvest was reduced it did not approximate the proportions of change in duck use. This suggest, as have other studies (Bellrose, 1944; and Kennedy and Arthur, 1973c), that beyond a certain level there is little relationship between the number of ducks on an area and the number harvested. The subimpoundment accounted for 64 percent of the harvest and the flooded dead timber hunter took 29 percent of the ducks. This is a marked change from 42 percent and 44 percent respectively for the same areas in 1972 (Table 1). Species Composition Species composition of the bag for the entire area, the flooded dead timber area and the subimpoundment area is found in Table 2. Mallards in the bag dropped from 72 percent in 1972 to 51 percent in 1973. This and other shifts in percent composition and volume are a result of low populations, weather and habitat conditions as mentioned earlier. Also a noticeable change is the increase in wood ducks from eight percent in 1972 to 21 percent in 1973. This is due primarily to an earlier season opening. Wood ducks were an important bird in the bag, particularly in the flooded dead timber area, until the 1st of November (Fig. 5 and Fig. 6). n 1972 they become infrequent in the bag around November 4th. This suggests a traditional migration period or changes in the weather and not shooting pressure which results in their exodus. Blue wing and green wing teal, and species of puddle ducks other than the mallard were more important birds in the bag in the subimpoundment area than in the flooded dead timber area.

-4- Literature Cited Bellrose, F, C. 1944. Duck populations and kill: an evaluation of some waterfowl regulations in llinois. llinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 23(2) :327q372. Kennedy, D, D, and G. C. Arthur, 1973a. Waterfowl harvest and hunter use at Carlyle Lake during the 1972 season. llinois Dept. Conservation, Migratory Bird Sect,, Periodic Rpt, No. 1. 17pp.... 1973b. Waterfowl hunter opinion survey of Carlyle Lake. llinois Dept. conservation, Migratory Bird Sect,, Periodic Rpt, No, 4. l3pp,, 197$c. Criteria for selection of llinois Waterfowl season dates, llinois Dept. Conservation, Migratory Bird Sept,, Periodic Rpt. No. 5, 32 pp,

V4 TO U 4. r-4.< cdf v'4c r-4 j M- M 4J a4ji CO -Q) o Q) 44< 4-5- r- r4< C4 O* % ** * ** 1' r-4 * *1 *.3 44 4Ji" CO * d % vw4 14%% co. m 1 U '.4 P.4 * * * C C N * C4 so C% O * * o * * 3 v,4 CO - O 13 ^-4 Po en rv*- 3 r* n n ) ln cn -1 CN CN o n ON Mn ok (A O r% o % Ln %o i i cn ^ q 4 < r- U- cn 4) 4.) M4. co r<*. ) 4) 54 5.4 U) U) '.4 P.4 44 '.4 S 441 U ft4 C-J 4J ao < SW 44 P4 cnfc.,;4 r-4 vn <n N O- * * * C%4v-%%t OK 6, * @3 'tso c"4e o * * * j- u- Ch "4. J 4 A O 4 1- r-41.t HQ@ 4 r4 v» f - k' in LO) o -4 rcn r OD CM4 ( '.4 2 4 4. QH - "M 4-4 ' u 4 >'OCO 4. A T A» 1-4 P EA C ' (. a. r-4 CO 4J 41 o E-1 4. Hco

-6- Table 2. Species composition of the bag at Carlyle Lake during the 1973 waterfowl season. Subimpoundment Flooded Dead Timber Total Sample Sample Sample Species Size % Size % Size % Mallard 416.47 434.56 85.51 Wood Duck 171.19 177.23 348.21 Green Wing Teal 71.8 28.4 99.6 Baldpate 57.6 34.4 91.5 Gadwall 36.4 29.4 65.4 Blue Wing Teal 36.4 11.1 47.3 Pintail 34.4 1.1 44.3 Black Duck 24.3 16.2 4.2 Ringneck 15.2 14.2 29.2 Shoveller 13.1 3 T 16.1 Lessor Scaup 8.1 9.1 17.1 Redhead 3 T 2 T 5 T Canvasback 2 T 2 T 4 T Goldeneye 2 T 1 T 3 T Hooded Merganser ---- 5.1 5 T Total 888.99 775.99 1,663.99

CO CU c3 *-4 r-4 4) 1-4 ro ' Cd W) Cd ) / r s*** r-4 z CO Cd 4.J CO W $- 4.J L'7-7- Ao- CUC>l r-4 CU C ) O - *r 44 4-1 - - -1-r -* Wi '! l -- - ' ' ' L(r) sj[a~unh C'Y) jo aquxn 4* 6 $4.r- cd rx 4J

4... 4aJ 3.. Flooded Dead Timber Area 2 loo-. L 2 Oct. Linl O 1 1 Nov. Days of the Season in 16 1 Nov. De( c. Figure 2. A progression of hunting pressure in the subimpoundment area and the flooded dead timber area at Carlyle Lake during the 1973 waterfowl season. 4 41 ) 4J o -8-3- 2 1 Mloo Subimpoundment Area Oct. Nov. Nov. Dec. Days of the Season

-9-1) r4 S 6 ) r-4 4.J Cd to.r4 r ) Cl ) ZO) 4.J, *4 4- Z ) r4 C Z r4 - m oi o * ' * OT qt ssaoons C* U Sr-4 l 4J 4J *r- ro

-1- -4 C) co i WU c U> Cd 41 r4, 4) CO r-4 4-4 41. * CD z 41 4-i CO 4J r-44 CO ~4 z ( C 4) >-4 4-i CN U p Cd CM4 CM4 r4< r oit ssaoons

-11- Cl) K '-4 U) 1.4 '-4 ' 1 ' ~i4 S w 7-4..4 r-4 Cu H U w '1-4. '. 4.J,X cn TO m U) S 4.14.1 -- 4J 4J *,- o *4-4z 4 V4 o > o c., % S *r- > 4) c ro 4 S* 4 44 CJ * 4 5. 1 re. "ý 4- V- Lrl

-12-4J 14 U) U) U U) A 1.4 '-4 C 14 4J - a :3 So P% " r-4 o O 1> -,tij to4 4J U 4 co t. 4-4 CO 'd* r- co 4-1 sato9ds

Ln *m,. -4 - CPO L n * U, ~ U) k '-4 U-. - n *r 4-) (r) - CO4 '4 o r- m-a 4 "L 14.4 CO1 4 rt '-4 r34 V4 - J.- J - Sn tc r). C4 -, oo \o c (spuisnoqji ut) spona jo aeqmnn