Street, Gainesville, Florida, 32653, USA b U.S. Geological Survey, Southeast Ecological Science Center, 7920 North West 71st Street,

Similar documents
Largemouth Bass Abundance and Aquatic Vegetation in Florida Lakes: An Alternative Interpretation

Carter G. Kruse a, Wayne A. Hubert a & Frank J. Rahel b a U.S. Geological Survey Wyoming Cooperative Fish and. Available online: 09 Jan 2011

Henry K. Van Offelen a, Charles C. Krueger a & Carl L. Schofield a a Department of Natural Resources, College of Agriculture and

Fisheries and Illinois Aquaculture Center

Using Population Models to Evaluate Management Alternatives for Gulf-strain Striped Bass

Bed Fishing for Florida Bass 1

POLYCULTURE OF LARGEMOUTH BASS (Micropterus salmoides) WITH BLUE TILAPIA (Oreochromis aurea): USING TILAPIA PROGENY AS FORAGE

Response of Largemouth Bass and Bluegill to Length Limits in Lake of Egypt

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Comparative Survival of Pellet-Reared Muskellunge Stocked As Fingerlings In Bluegill Ponds With and Without Largemouth Bass

Individual Reproductive Success of Largemouth Bass and Smallmouth Bass Subjected to Different Components of Competitive Angling Events

Temporal Trends in Voluntary Release of Largemouth Bass

NURSERY POND Fish Management Report. Jason C. Doll Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Fish Lake Informational Meeting. Dan Wilfond, Fisheries Specialist Deserae Hendrickson, Area Fisheries Supervisor MN DNR Fisheries - Duluth

Current projects for Fisheries Research Unit of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Fall 2017: Problem Set 3 (DUE Oct 26; 50 points)

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Aquatic Plant Management and Importance to Sport Fisheries

MARTINDALE POND Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Largemouth Bass Abundance and Angler Catch Rates following a Habitat Enhancement Project at Lake Kissimmee, Florida

Building a science for landscape fisheries management

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Introduction: JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Relative Size Selectivity of Trap Nets for Eight Species of Fish'

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

2014 Winnebago System Walleye Report

Initial Mortality of Black Bass in B.A.S.S. Fishing Tournaments

Assessment Summary Report Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper SEDAR 7

Hatcheries: Role in Restoration and Enhancement of Salmon Populations

Comparative Survival and Growth of Various Size Channel Catfish Stocked Into a Lake Containing Largemouth

Advice June 2014

FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES OF THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AND MIDDLE CORRIDOR

Housekeeping. WF4133 Fisheries Science. Quick review. In the news. Direct enumeration 2/7/2018 HOW DO WE MEASURE & QUANTIFY RECRUITMENT?

Simulated Impacts of Tournament-Associated Mortality on Largemouth Bass Fisheries

Arizona Game and Fish Department Region VI Fisheries Program

First-Year Growth and Survival of Largemouth Bass Fingerlings Stocked into Western South Dakota Ponds

Fifty years ago, a single cod was large enough to feed a family of four or five. Today it is barely enough for one

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries and Wildlife

2015 Winnebago System Walleye Report

Evaluating the impact of fishing forage fish on predators. Ray Hilborn School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington

Winter Steelhead Redd to Fish conversions, Spawning Ground Survey Data

SKIATOOK LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

FACTORS AFFECTING NESTING SUCCESS IN FLORIDA BASS MICROPTERUS FLORIDANUS

Susquehanna River Walleye Fishery

Alberta Conservation Association 2013/14 Project Summary Report

2017 Lake Winnebago Bottom Trawling Assessment Report

Salmon age and size at maturity: Patterns and processes

Environmental influences on largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides populations in shallow Nebraska lakes

Discussion on the Selection of the Recommended Fish Passage Design Discharge

IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA

Chesapeake Bay Jurisdictions White Paper on Draft Addendum IV for the Striped Bass Fishery Management Plan

Conservation Limits and Management Targets

LOGAN MARTIN RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT REPORT. Prepared by. E. Daniel Catchings District Fisheries Supervisor

Behavior and survival of hatchery reared advanced fingerling largemouth bass using radio telemetry. Brandon Thompson

Results of the 2015 nontidal Potomac River watershed Smallmouth Bass Young of Year Survey

HADDOCK ON THE SOUTHERN SCOTIAN SHELF AND IN THE BAY OF FUNDY (DIV. 4X/5Y)

INLAND LAKE MANAGEMENT REPORT FY Spring 2008

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Developments in managing small pelagic fisheries

Lect 19 - Populations - Chapter 23. Different Levels of Ecological Organization. Populations

9.4.5 Advice September Widely distributed and migratory stocks Herring in the Northeast Atlantic (Norwegian spring-spawning herring)

Analysis of the Recreational Fishery and Angler Attitudes Toward Hydrilla in Lake Seminole, a Southeastern Reservoir

Wisconsin, 53706, USA Published online: 31 Aug 2011.

Surf Clams: Latitude & Growth

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF NATURAL MORTALITY FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF YELLOWFIN TUNA IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

Fish Community and Aquatic Ecosystem Responses to the Cessation of Eurasian Watermilfoil Chemical Treatment on Lake Ellwood, Wisconsin

Rat Cove and Brookwood Point littoral fish survey, 2002

"Recommended Improvements for the Next Pacific Salmon Treaty"

Zooplankton Availability to. Larval Walleye (Sander vitreus) in Black Lake, MI, USA

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division, Lake Superior Area

Population-level Impacts of Largemouth Bass Mortality Associated with Tournaments in a Texas Reservoir

Florida s Freshwater Fisheries. Mike S. Allen Mark W. Rogers Galen Kaufman. Chris M. Horton

Redd Dewatering and Juvenile Salmonid Stranding in the Lower Feather River,

WF4313/6413-Fisheries Management. Class 22

SOONER LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

ASSESSMENT OF BLACK CRAPPIE AND WHITE PERCH IN HIGHLAND LAKE, STODDARD-WASHINGTON, NH (2014) New Hampshire

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

The Prevalence of Different Species of Fish in Four Different Habitats of Douglas Lake

Factors Affecting the Reproduction of Bluegill Bream and Largemouth Black Bass in Ponds

FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. Georgia Freshwater Fisheries. Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

July 9, SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture 1

Protect Our Reefs Grant Interim Report (October 1, 2008 March 31, 2009) Principal investigators: Donald C. Behringer and Mark J.

Winnebago System Walleye Report. Adam Nickel, Winnebago System Gamefish Biologist, August 2018

Deer Management Unit 252

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

BOGUS CREEK SALMON STUDIES 2002

SWG-11-JM-10. F Limit Reference Points about Preventing Recruitment Overfishing and its Uncertainty

EcoLogic Memorandum. TO: Ben Brezell; EDR FROM: Mark Arrigo RE: Possible Impacts of Dredging Snooks Pond DATE: 6/4/07

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions (Baltic Sea)

A field energy budget for northern pike, an aquatic piscivore. James S. Diana School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan

Paper prepared by the Secretariat

CHAPTER 10 TOTAL RECREATIONAL FISHING DAMAGES AND CONCLUSIONS

EEB 122b PRACTICE SECOND MIDTERM

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

2017 North Pacific Albacore Stock Assessment

Transcription:

This article was downloaded by: [University of Florida] On: 02 February 2013, At: 10:07 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Transactions of the American Fisheries Society Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/utaf20 Evaluating the Potential for Stock Size to Limit Recruitment in Largemouth Bass Micheal S. Allen a, Mark W. Rogers a, Matthew J. Catalano a, Daniel G. Gwinn a & Stephen J. Walsh b a School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, 7922 North West 71st Street, Gainesville, Florida, 32653, USA b U.S. Geological Survey, Southeast Ecological Science Center, 7920 North West 71st Street, Gainesville, Florida, 32653, USA Version of record first published: 19 Aug 2011. To cite this article: Micheal S. Allen, Mark W. Rogers, Matthew J. Catalano, Daniel G. Gwinn & Stephen J. Walsh (2011): Evaluating the Potential for Stock Size to Limit Recruitment in Largemouth Bass, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 140:4, 1093-1100 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2011.599259 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140:1093 1100, 2011 C American Fisheries Society 2011 ISSN: 0002-8487 print / 1548-8659 online DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2011.599259 ARTICLE Evaluating the Potential for Stock Size to Limit Recruitment in Largemouth Bass Micheal S. Allen,* Mark W. Rogers, Matthew J. Catalano, and Daniel G. Gwinn School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, 7922 North West 71st Street, Gainesville, Florida 32653, USA Stephen J. Walsh U.S. Geological Survey, Southeast Ecological Science Center, 7920 North West 71st Street, Gainesville, Florida 32653, USA Abstract Compensatory changes in juvenile survival allow fish stocks to maintain relatively constant recruitment across a wide range of stock sizes (and levels of fishing), but few studies have experimentally explored recruitment compensation in fish populations. We evaluated the potential for recruitment compensation in largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides by stocking six 0.4-ha hatchery ponds with adult densities ranging from 6 to 40 fish over 2 years. Ponds were drained in October each year, and the age-0 fish densities were used as a measure of recruitment. We found no relationship between stock abundance and recruitment; ponds with low adult densities produced nearly as many recruits as the higher-density ponds in some cases. Both prey abundance and the growth of age-0 largemouth bass declined with age-0 fish density. Recruit abundance was highly variable both within and among the adult density groups, and thus we were unable to identify a clear stock recruit relationship for largemouth bass. Our results indicate that reducing the number of effective spawners via angling practices would not reduce recruitment over a relatively large range in stock size. Estimating the strength of compensatory density dependence is a fundamental problem in natural resource management. The degree to which populations compensate for human-induced changes in survival, growth, and reproduction has implications for resource management strategies such as harvest policies and habitat alterations. Compensation in fish populations is thought to occur mainly through changes in survival during larval and juvenile life phases. Across many species and life history types, per capita recruitment rates increase as population size decreases (Cushing 1975; Myers et al. 1999; Rose et al. 2001), resulting in stable average recruitment levels across a wide range of adult abundances (i.e., compensation; Walters and Martell 2004). Measuring compensation in juvenile fish survival is difficult in field studies because (1) long time series of stock and recruit abundance are required, (2) measures of stock and recruitment include a high degree of uncertainty, and (3) direct estimates from experimental density manipulations are rare (Walters and Martell 2004). Most marine fish stock assessments incorporate compensation with stock recruit relationships (e.g., Ricker or Beverton Holt models). Parameters of these models can be estimated by fitting empirical models to time series data of adult abundance and recruitment, which are typically estimated from age-structured stock assessment models. DeGisi (1994) experimentally manipulated populations of brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis in seven Sierra Nevada mountain lakes in California, and Myers (2002) concluded from those data that per capita recruitment increased 19-fold at low stock densities relative to the unfished density. Such experimental manipulations are logistically infeasible in most field settings; thus, experimental measures have seldom been obtained. *Corresponding author: msal@ufl.edu Received August 4, 2010; accepted February 15, 2011 1093

1094 ALLEN ET AL. Measures of recruitment compensation for freshwater fish species are rare because of the lack of long-term data on stock and recruit abundance. Long-term stock and recruit data are largely limited to the Great Lakes, experimental research stations, or at locations where monitoring has been required for resource allocation purposes (e.g., treaty agreements). Hansen et al. (1998) estimated Ricker stock recruitment curve parameters for a population of walleye Sander vitreus. Myers et al. (1999) obtained field estimates of recruitment compensation for a few freshwater and anadromous species, but their review primarily identified stock recruit parameters for marine fish species. Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides support important freshwater fisheries, but few previous studies have identified a stock recruitment relationship that could be used to infer compensation in recruitment. Jackson and Noble (2000) found that a Ricker stock recruit curve explained about 20% of the variation in age-0 largemouth bass catch rates at Jordan Lake, North Carolina. Reynolds and Babb (1978) detected a Ricker-type stock recruit curve across 37 Missouri ponds, peak age-0 fish densities (800/0.405 ha) occurring at about 10 adult largemouth bass/0.405 ha. Bennett et al. (1969) found that the number of largemouth bass fry produced was not an effective predictor of year-class strength at Ridge Lake, Illinois, suggesting compensatory juvenile survival. Kramer and Smith (1962) noted that largemouth bass year-class strength was set before fry dispersal at two Minnesota lakes, which could indicate weak densitydependent mortality due to protection of fry by adults. However, variation in juvenile largemouth bass survival rates during the first year of life is common (Miranda and Hubbard 1994; Olson 1996; Ludsin and DeVries 1997; Slaughter et al. 2008), which suggests the potential for strong compensatory changes in survival in some instances. Because largemouth bass and other centrarchids are nest brooders, researchers and anglers have expressed concern that catch-and-release fishing during spawning can lower recruitment. Removing adults from spawning beds can reduce individual nest success via nest predators (Kieffer et al. 1995; Philipp et al. 1997; Ridgway and Shuter 1997; Suski et al. 2003), but no studies have shown whether this could reduce recruitment and ultimately influence adult fish abundance. The degree of compensatory change in juvenile survival rates will determine the population-level implications of harvest and reduced nest success via catch-and-release fishing. Gwinn and Allen (2010) simulated effects of reduced nest success on largemouth bass recruitment, but they assumed a level of recruitment compensation based on a literature review of short-lived predators (Myers et al. 1999). Thus, there is a need to understand the degree to which changes in early life survival of largemouth bass can compensate for reduced reproductive output, which would allow for an informed assessment of how angling practices (e.g., harvest, release mortality, tournaments, and nest fishing), stocking rates, and habitat alterations will influence largemouth bass recruitment and abundance. Our objective was to evaluate the potential for recruitment compensation for largemouth bass. We used a pond experiment to address this objective, and we explored the mechanisms by which recruitment compensation could occur by assessing prey abundance for age-0 fish and density-dependent growth. METHODS We manipulated the reproductive output of largemouth bass by varying the number of adults stocked into 0.405-ha hatchery ponds and evaluated recruitment to the fall. We stocked six experimental ponds located at a U.S. Geological Survey facility in Gainesville, Florida, with brood largemouth bass in early January 2007 and 2008. All ponds were drained prior to experiment initiation, between years 1 and 2, and at the end of year 2. Reproductive output was manipulated by varying the number of adult largemouth bass across ponds and by standardizing all fish to between 350- and 450-mm total length (TL). The number of adults stocked in each pond ranged from 6 to 40 each year, which resulted in a range of total adult largemouth bass biomass that was representative of natural Florida populations in 60 lakes sampled by Hoyer and Canfield (1996). We stocked adult largemouth bass such that two ponds received six, one pond received 20, two ponds received 30, and one pond received 40 in each year. Two ponds each year received six adult largemouth bass so that the experiment would have replicate levels of the low adult abundance treatment. The 6- and 40-fish ponds represented extreme low and high values from Hoyer and Canfield (1996), whereas the 20- and 30-fish ponds represented the approximate average conditions across Florida lakes. The adult stocking densities were randomly assigned to ponds each year. We attempted to stock adult largemouth bass at a 1:1 sex ratio in each pond. Adult gender was estimated by probing the urogenital opening with a 1.0-mm diameter plastic tube (Benz and Jacobs 1986), and we evaluated our efficacy to identify gender by sacrificing a random sample of 23 adult fish, which were evaluated by two independent people to verify fish gender. Ponds were stocked with broodfish in early January and drained in October to assess age-0 fish abundance. Abundance and size structure of age-0 largemouth bass in fall is generally indicative of age-1 recruit abundance in Florida (Rogers and Allen 2009); thus, draining the ponds in October served as our index of recruit abundance. Ponds were also stocked with prey and age-1 largemouth bass to serve as predators. We stocked a total of 24 33 kg/ha of bluegill Lepomis macrochirus and redear sunfish L. microlophus in each pond. The Lepomis spp. stocked ranged from 4- to 25-cm TL in all ponds in order to serve as both prey for the adult largemouth bass and to provide broodfish to spawn and provide prey for age-0 largemouth bass. Golden shiner Notemigonus crysoleucas were also stocked as forage in all ponds at rates of 2 4 kg/ha. The size distributions and total biomass of prey stocked was similar for all ponds. Age-1 largemouth bass ranging from 80- to 200-mm TL were stocked at densities of

STOCK SIZE AND RECRUITMENT IN LARGEMOUTH BASS 1095 80 per pond to serve as predators on the age-0 largemouth bass. The age-1 predator stocking densities were determined from historical data from Florida lakes (Hoyer and Canfield 1996) such that each pond would have approximately average abundance of age-1 largemouth bass predators. Ponds were aerated continuously through the summer months to prevent fish kills. To quantify reproductive output, we conducted snorkel surveys to measure the number of nests that produced eggs and fry within each pond. Ponds were snorkeled twice weekly from February to May each year, during the time when nests were present. Nests were marked with fluorescent tape to prevent recounts, and nests were considered successful if they were occupied by a guarding male and had swim-up fry (Philipp et al. 1997; Suski et al. 2003). Age-0 largemouth bass, predator, and prey fish densities in October were obtained by draining the ponds and a sampling design. Owing to the relatively large size of the ponds, obtaining an accurate count of the fish was difficult because of fish being trapped in bottom sediments in proximity of the catch basin. We conducted quadrat sampling in the sediment of the lower one-third of each pond bottom to estimate the number of age-0 fish that were not collected in the catch basin. Total density of age-0 fish, predators (i.e., non age-0 largemouth bass), and prey fish were each obtained by summing the number recovered in the catch basin and the quadrat-estimated number of fish that were trapped in the sediment after draining each pond. We evaluated the evidence for recruitment compensation by exploring hypotheses about the effects of stock size on recruit abundance. The hypotheses we considered were (1) a proportional relationship between stock size and recruit abundance (i.e., a zero intercept linear regression, R = bs), (2) a Beverton Holt asymptotic relationship (R = as/[1 + bs]), and (3) a Ricker dome-shaped relationship (R = ase bs ). Values of R represent recruits, and S is the stock size (number of adults). The proportional relationship infers no recruitment compensation, whereas the Beverton Holt model has increasing recruits per spawner as spawner abundance declines. The Ricker model allows compensation at low stock sizes and overcompensation (i.e., lower absolute recruitment) at high stock abundances, as is typically associated with cannibalism (Ricker 1975). We fitted each model using lognormal distributions and maximum likelihood estimation. Errors in stock recruitment relationships are typically assumed to follow the lognormal distribution because recruitment is the product of survival rates through several early life stages. We tested the evidence for each model using Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size (AIC c ; Anderson 2008). We considered AIC c values exceeding 8 as indication that a model had substantially less data support than the most credible model (the model with the lowest AIC c value). We evaluated evidence for prey limitation and densitydependent growth for age-0 largemouth bass. We used leastsquares nonlinear regression to assess whether biomass of bluegill vulnerable to predation by age-0 largemouth bass declined with age-0 fish density. We considered bluegill vulnerable to age-0 largemouth bass if they were less than one-third of age- 0 largemouth bass mean total length in each pond (Lawrence 1958; Shelton et al. 1979; Garvey and Stein 1998). Nonlinear regression was also used to evaluate whether age-0 largemouth bass total length (mm) varied with age-0 fish density. We evaluated habitat and predation risk factors that could have confounded the relationship between stock and recruits across ponds. All ponds were treated with fluridone to control growth of hydrilla Hydrilla verticillata, but the abundance of hydrilla still varied among ponds. We measured the percent of pond volume inhabited by hydrilla (PVI) for each pond with a Lowrance LCX-26c HD sonar and Global Positioning System. At least 50 random samples from all points on each pond were taken and measured for pond depth and plant height to obtain a percent of pond volume inhabited by aquatic plants (PVI; Florida Lakewatch 2007). Aquatic plants provide refuge from predation (Savino and Stein 1982), and juvenile survival of centrarchids is often influenced by aquatic plant coverage in lakes and reservoirs (Crowder and Cooper 1982; Bettoli et al. 1993; Hoyer and Canfield 1996; Miranda and Pugh 1997). Thus, variation in hydrilla abundance across ponds could influence our results by mitigating predation risk. We evaluated whether aquatic plant PVI was related to age-0 largemouth bass density (i.e., recruitment) across ponds using correlation analysis. We assessed whether the number of adults (stock size) was related to aquatic plant PVI because a relationship between stock abundance and plant abundance could mask a stock recruit relationship by altering juvenile survival through factors other than stock size (e.g., predation risk). We further assessed whether the density of non age-0 largemouth bass predators present upon draining the ponds was related to hydrilla PVI, which also indicated whether predation risk varied with aquatic plant PVI. RESULTS Our procedure for determining adult fish gender was effective. Gender assignment was correct for 91% of the 23 sacrificed fish, as verified by both independent examiners, indicating that we were successful in establishing an approximate 1:1 sex ratio of age-1 largemouth bass stocked into each pond. This removed the possible confounding effect of variable sex ratio on reproductive output among stock density treatments. We found nesting largemouth bass from February to early May in both years, and we found no evidence that the timing of spawning varied with adult abundance. The two 30-fish ponds in 2008 had poor visibility due to turbidity, which precluded estimating the total number of successful nests in those ponds. The number of successful nests was positively related to the number of adults for the remaining ponds (P < 0.01). Fish re-nested in some cases because a six-fish pond produced six nests in one pond (Figure 1). In order to use all replicates, adult

1096 ALLEN ET AL. FIGURE 1. Number of successful largemouth bass spawning nests as a function of the number of adults stocked for the 10 sample ponds for which the number of nests was estimable. Two of the ponds with six adults produced two nests (N = 4 total). density was used as the measure of reproductive output in the subsequent analyses. Adult density was not a strong predictor of recruitment. The number of age-0 largemouth bass produced across ponds ranged from 98 to nearly 1,150 fish/0.405 ha in October of both years combined (Figure 2). The highest age-0 (recruit) density occurred in the 40 adult fish pond in 2008, and the second highest (900 per 0.405 ha) occurred in a six-adult fish pond in 2009. Age-0 density was highly variable both across and within the adult density groups. Fish ponds stocked with six adults produced a range of 100 900 age-0 fish. Similarly, the 30-adult ponds showed large variation in recruitment (ranging from 100 to 700 age-0 fish; Figure 2). Our analysis did not support a single stock recruitment model that best fit the data owing to the high variability in recruitment within and among adult density values. The Beverton Holt curve had the lowest AIC c value, but the support for this value was not substantially stronger than the proportional ( AIC c = 1.9) and Ricker ( AIC c = 0.87) curves. The similarity of support among these models resulted because of high variability among the ponds and no apparent impact of stock size on recruitment (Figure 2), and the amount of variation in recruitment explained by stock size was less than 10% for all models. Overall, the experiment showed potential for recruitment compensation because we found that ponds with six adults could produce similar recruitment as a 40-adult pond in some cases, suggesting cases of higher recruits per spawner at low spawner abundance. Average recruitment per adult in the six-fish ponds was nearly three times higher (75 recruits/adult) than average recruitment per adult in the 40-fish ponds (24 recruits/adult), which suggests some density dependence in juvenile survival. Nevertheless, we were unable to identify a single stock recruit curve that best fit the data, supporting the hypothesis that recruitment was not dependent on stock abundance for the range of stock sizes we evaluated. We found evidence of relative prey limitations with increasing age-0 largemouth bass density and density-dependent growth. Biomass of bluegill that were of vulnerable size to age-0 largemouth bass declined with age-0 fish density across ponds (P < 0.001; Figure 3). Length frequencies of age-0 largemouth bass were unimodal, making mean total length a suitable measure of fish growth. The nonlinear regression showed a significant decline in mean total length with age-0 largemouth bass density (P < 0.01; Figure 3). Mean length of age-0 fish ranged from 6 to 18 cm (Figure 3), with the highest value representing a six-adult pond that produced 100 age-0 fish in 2009. The lowest mean length (5.9 cm) occurred for a 30-adult pond in 2008 that produced 505 age-0 fish. Thus, we found evidence for top-down effects of age-0 largemouth bass on bluegill prey biomass and evidence for density-dependent growth of age-0 fish. Aquatic plant abundance across ponds did not vary in a systematic way that would be expected to confound a stock recruit relationship. Hydrilla PVI ranged from 7% to 90% across ponds but was not related to the number of adults stocked or age-0 largemouth bass density (Figure 4). We found that non-age- 0 largemouth bass predator density was positively related to hydrilla PVI (Figure 4). However, this would likely stabilize predation risk across ponds, which would reduce variability in the data. Thus, aquatic plant abundance varied across ponds but did not vary with stock abundance or predator density in a manner that would be expected to mask a stock recruit relationship. FIGURE 2. Age-0 largemouth bass density (fish/0.405 ha) versus the number of adults for the 12 sample ponds. Predicted values for the proportional, Beverton Holt, and Ricker stock recruit models are shown. DISCUSSION Fisheries evaluations have found that high variability in stock recruit relationships is universal (Ricker 1975; Walters

STOCK SIZE AND RECRUITMENT IN LARGEMOUTH BASS 1097 FIGURE 3. Vulnerable prey (bluegill) biomass (kg/0.405 ha; top panel) and age-0 largemouth bass mean total length (mm; bottom panel) as functions of age-0 largemouth bass density (fish/0.405 ha). and Martell 2004), and the results of our pond study also showed high variability in recruit abundance across a wide range of stock sizes. We were unable to demonstrate compelling support for a proportional stock recruit relationship versus either of the two forms of density-dependent stock recruit curves. Thus, the data suggested that recruitment was not predictable from adult density. Weak associations between stock size and recruitment have caused researchers to argue that recruitment is determined by environmental factors rather than stock abundance (summarized by Van den Avyle and Hayward 1999). Obviously, recruitment is influenced by stock size at very low stock levels, and it is possible that our low and high fish treatments were not extreme enough to elucidate the shape of the stock recruit curve. Reynolds and Babb (1978) found that peak average largemouth bass recruitment occurred at 10 adults/0.405 ha in Missouri ponds, whereas our low adult treatments had six adults/0.405 ha. We did not see a decline in recruitment at higher stock densities as shown by Reynolds and Babb (1978). The range in adult abundance in our ponds represented extreme values across Florida lakes (Hoyer and Canfield 1996); thus, our values should apply to the expected ranges for natural largemouth bass populations. FIGURE 4. Number of adults (top panel), age-0 largemouth bass density (fish/0.405 ha; middle panel), and predator density (predators/0.405 ha; bottom panel) versus the percent of pond volume occupied by aquatic plants (PVI). Correlation coefficients and P-values are shown for each relationship. Our experiment also suggested that high variability in recruits for each level of stock size is not simply owing to sampling variability and biases in observing stock and recruits from wild populations. Observation error associated with sampling stock and recruits adds considerable uncertainty to these relationships (Rose et al. 2001), but in our study the ponds were stocked with known numbers of adults and recruits were estimated by draining the ponds, thus minimizing observation error.

1098 ALLEN ET AL. Time series autocorrelation also biases stock recruit estimates because adult abundances are dependent on past recruitment (Walters and Martell 2004), but we negated this bias because the stock recruit observations were independent across ponds. Despite eliminating these problems common to empirical studies, our data showed high variability in recruits across the range of stock sizes. This infers that stock recruit relationships may be weak relative to other mechanisms driving recruitment. Because of high variability in the recruitment process, measuring stock recruit relationships will be even more difficult in wild stocks, and more manipulative experiments should be conducted for investigating density-dependent compensation in fish recruitment. A few field investigations have shown potential for recruitment compensation in black bass recruitment. Reynolds and Babb (1978) found a dome-shaped stock recruit curve for largemouth bass in Missouri ponds. Weidel et al. (2007) conducted a whole-lake removal of nonnative smallmouth bass M. dolomieu at Little Moose Lake, New York. They estimated about a 90% reduction in abundance of adult fish, yet both recruitment and total smallmouth bass abundance increased after harvest was initiated (Weidel et al. 2007; Zipkin et al. 2008). Zipkin et al. (2008) built a simulation model using the same data from Little Moose Lake and showed that overcompensation (i.e., Ricker stock recruit curve) was credible for that population. Our study showed similar average recruitment for low versus high stock sizes of largemouth bass, and thus we did not find evidence that recruitment increased as stock density declined. Prior to harvest, the Little Moose Lake smallmouth bass population was a very-high-density population with fish exhibiting slow growth (Weidel et al. 2007). It is possible that our high adult density treatments were not high enough to elicit an overcompensatory response, and future evaluations should explore if this occurs for largemouth bass populations. Differences in age-0 fish growth rates could have influenced predation mortality among ponds. Age-0 fish growth rates were inversely related to density, indicating potential for relative resource limitation at high age-0 fish densities. Juvenile fish survival rates are often positively related to fish growth and size (Houde 1997), and thus smaller age-0 largemouth bass would be expected to have higher mortality rates than larger fish. Wicker and Johnson (1987) found that age-0 largemouth bass in Florida had high mortality when prey resources were lowest in early summer. We found that prey abundance was negatively related to age-0 largemouth bass density and that growth was density dependent. Slaughter et al. (2008) found that growth and survival of age-0 largemouth bass were positively related in some cases and not others in a pond experiment. However, Jackson and Noble (2000) found no evidence for densitydependent growth of age-0 largemouth bass through time in a large reservoir. Recruitment was not related to stock abundance in this study, but we did find density-dependent growth of age-0 fish which could have influenced survival rates across ponds. Density-dependent spawning of adult fish is another potential mechanism for recruitment compensation. Ridgway et al. (2002) and Dunlop et al. (2007) showed that the proportion of male smallmouth bass that build nests declines with male abundance. Skip spawning by females is reported for many fish species, and the occurrence of skip spawning can be dependent on the amount of available food resources (Rideout et al. 2005). Thus, the proportion of adults that spawn could be influenced by adult density, which would cause the number of nests to decline with stock abundance. Bennett et al. (1969) noted that the number of adult largemouth bass had either no effect or a negative impact on the number of fry produced. Our four ponds with six adults had three to six successful nests, indicating that some males renested through the spawning season. Conversely, the 30 and 40 fish ponds had only about half as many nests as adults stocked (Figure 1). The number of successful nests was positively related to the number of adult stocked in this study, suggesting that adult density was an effective measure of overall reproductive output. However, more work is needed to determine whether density-dependent nesting activity of adult fish is a mechanism for recruitment compensation in black bass populations. Our study attempted to isolate the effect of stock size on recruitment, but like many pond studies, other factors varied across ponds that could have influenced our results. Variation in aquatic plant PVI among ponds may have influenced predation risk for age-0 fish. Our relatively low sample size (N = 12 ponds) precluded estimation of interaction effects between aquatic plant PVI and stock size. However, aquatic plant PVI did not vary in a systematic manner that would be expected to directly confound the effect of stock size. Owing to turbidity in two ponds during 2008, we were unable to use the number of successful nests or total egg production as a measure of reproductive output and instead used the number of adults stocked. This could have contributed to the variation in responses across ponds, particularly if the average number of eggs produced per nest varied across adult treatments. The number of eggs in largemouth bass nests is positively related to fish size (Philipp et al. 1997), and we attempted to control for this by stocking a narrow and similar size range of adults in all ponds. However, measures of total egg production rather than stock size could potentially reduce the variation in responses in future studies. We did not identify a specific form of a stock recruit relationship for largemouth bass, but our study has implications regarding the importance of angling on recruitment. The results indicated that largemouth bass recruitment is not directly dependent on spawning stock density across a wide range of densities. These results infer that reduced nest success via fishing activities (e.g., Philipp et al. 1997) would not be expected to reduce overall recruitment in many instances. Impacts could occur under levels of extreme nest reductions owing to fishing, and the vulnerability of largemouth bass populations to these effects could vary with latitude (Gwinn and Allen 2010). However, our experiment varied adult abundance over a wide range (6 to 40 adults), and we saw no change in average recruitment levels.

STOCK SIZE AND RECRUITMENT IN LARGEMOUTH BASS 1099 More studies are needed to evaluate how recruitment is influenced by reproductive output, but our results showed the loss of nests would not directly reduce largemouth bass recruitment. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank K. Rice, S. Ruessler, and the U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center for use of hatchery ponds and substantial cooperation and support throughout the project. B. Baker and B. Matthias helped with data processing. Advice on application rates of fluridone was provided by M. Netherland. Conversations with D. Philipp, W. Porak, C. Suski, and C. Walters helped us when conceptualizing this problem. Reference to trade names does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. REFERENCES Anderson, D. R. 2008. Model-based inference in the life sciences: a primer on evidence. Springer-Verlag, New York. Bennett, G. W., H. W. Adkins, and W. F. Childers. 1969. Largemouth bass and other fishes in Ridge Lake, Illinois, 1941 1963. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 30. Benz, G. W., and R. P. Jacobs. 1986. Practical field methods of sexing largemouth bass. Progressive Fish-Culturist 48:221 225. Bettoli, P. W., M. J. Maceina. R. L. Noble, and R. K. Betsill. 1993. Response of a reservoir fish community to aquatic vegetation removal. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13:110 124. Crowder, L. B., and W. E. Cooper. 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63:1802 1813. Cushing, D. H. 1975. Marine ecology and fisheries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. DeGisi, J. S. 1994. Year class strength and catchability of mountain lake brook trout. Master s thesis. University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Dunlop, E. S., B. J. Shuter, and U. Dieckmann. 2007. Demographic and evolutionary consequences of selective mortality: predictions from an eco-genetic model for smallmouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:749 765. Florida Lakewatch. 2007. Long term fish, plants, and water quality monitoring program: 2006 2007 data. Florida Lakewatch, Gainesville. Garvey, J. E., and R. A. Stein. 1998. Linking bluegill and gizzard shad prey assemblages to growth of age-0 largemouth bass in reservoirs. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127:70 83. Gwinn, D. G., and M. S. Allen. 2010. Exploring population-level effects of fishery closures during spawning: an example using nest building largemouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:626 634. Hansen, M. J., M. A. Bozek, J. R. Newby, S. P. Newman, and M. D. Staggs. 1998. Factors affecting recruitment of walleyes in Escanaba Lake, Wisconsin, 1958 1996. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18:764 774. Houde, E. D. 1997. Patterns and consequences of selective processes in teleost early life histories. Pages 169 193 in R. C. Chambers and E. A. Trippel, editors. Early life history and recruitment in fish populations. Chapman and Hall, New York. Hoyer, M. V., and D. E. Canfield. 1996. Largemouth bass abundance and aquatic vegetation in Florida lakes: an empirical analysis. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 34:23 32. Jackson, J. R., and R. L. Noble. 2000. Relationships between annual variations in reservoir conditions and age-0 largemouth bass year-class strength. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:699 715. Kieffer, J. D., M. R. Kubacki, F. J. S. Phelan, D. P. Philipp, and B. L. Tufts. 1995. Effects of catch-and-release angling on nesting male smallmouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124:70 76. Kramer, R. H., and L. L. Smith Jr. 1962. Formation of year classes in largemouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 91:29 41. Lawrence, J. M. 1958. Estimated sizes of various forage fishes largemouth bass can swallow. Proceedings of the Annual Conference Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners 11(1957):220 225. Ludsin, S. A., and D. R. DeVries. 1997. First year recruitment of largemouth bass: the interdependency of early life stages. Ecological Applications 7:1024 1038. Miranda, L. E., and W. D. Hubbard. 1994. Length-dependent winter survival and lipid composition of age-0 largemouth bass in Bay Springs reservoir, Mississippi. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 123:80 87. Miranda, L. E., and L. L. Pugh. 1997. Relationship between vegetation coverage and abundance, size, and diet of juvenile largemouth bass during winter. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:601 610. Myers, R. A. 2002. Recruitment: understanding density dependence in fish populations. Pages 123 148 in P. J. B. Hart and J. D. Reynolds, editors. Handbook of fish biology and fisheries: fish biology, volume 1. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Myers, R. A., K. G. Bowen, and N. J. Barrowman. 1999. Maximum reproductive rates of fish at low population sizes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:2402 2419. Olson, M. H. 1996. Ontogenetic niche shifts in largemouth bass: variability and consequences for first-year growth. Ecology 77:179 190. Philipp, D. P., C. A. Toline, M. F. Kubacki, D. B. F. Philipp, and F. J. S. Phelan. 1997. The impact of catch-and-release angling on the reproductive success of smallmouth bass and largemouth bass. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:557 567. Reynolds, J. B., and L. R. Babb. 1978. Structure and dynamics of largemouth bass populations. Pages 50 61 in G. D. Novinger and J. G. Dillard, editors. New approaches to the management of small impoundments. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 5, Bethesda, Maryland. Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 191. Rideout, R. M., G. A. Rose, and M. P. M. Burton. 2005. Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes. Fish and Fisheries 6:50 72. Ridgway, M. S., and B. J. Shuter. 1997. Predicting the effects of angling for nesting male smallmouth bass on production of age-0 fish with an individualbased model. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17: 568 580. Ridgway, M. S., B. J. Shuter, T. A. Middel, and M. L. Gross. 2002. Spatial ecology and density-dependent processes in smallmouth bass: the juvenile transition hypothesis. Pages 47 60 in D. P. Philipp and M. S. Ridgway, editors. Black bass: ecology, conservation, and management. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 31, Bethesda, Maryland. Rogers, M. W., and M. S. Allen. 2009. Exploring the generality of recruitment hypotheses for largemouth bass along a latitudinal gradient of Florida lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:23 37. Rose, K. A., J. H. Cowan Jr., K. O. Winemiller, R. A. Myers, and R. Hilborn. 2001. Compensatory density dependence in fish populations: importance, controversy, understanding and prognosis. Fish and Fisheries 2:293 327. Savino, J. F., and R. A. Stein. 1982. Predator-prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 111:255 266. Shelton, W. L., W. D. Davies, T. A. King, and T. J. Timmons. 1979. Variation in the growth of the initial year class of largemouth bass in West Point Reservoir, Alabama and Georgia. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 108:142 149. Slaughter, J. E. IV, R. A. Wright, and D. R. DeVries. 2008. Latitudinal influence on first-year growth and survival of largemouth bass. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28:993 1000. Suski, C. D., J. H. Svec, J. B. Ludden, F. J. S. Phelan, and D. P. Philipp. 2003. The effect of catch and release angling on parental care behavior of male smallmouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:210 218.

1100 ALLEN ET AL. Van den Avyle, M. J., and R. S. Hayward. 1999. Dynamics of exploited fish populations. Pages 127 166 in C. C. Kohler and W. A. Hubert, editors. Inland fisheries management in North America, 2nd edition. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. Walters, C. J., and S. J. D. Martell. 2004. Fisheries ecology and management. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Weidel, B. C., D. C. Josephson, and C. E. Kraft. 2007. Littoral fish community response to smallmouth bass removal from an Adirondack Lake. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:778 789. Wicker, A. W., and W. E. Johnson. 1987. Relationships among fat content, condition factor, and first-year survival of Florida largemouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 118:284 271. Zipkin, E. F., P. J. Sullivan, E. G. Cooch, C. E. Kraft, B. J. Shuter, and B. C. Weidel. 2008. Overcompensatory response of a smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) population to harvest: release from competition? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:2279 2292.