Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction Plans. Norman L. Morrow Fresh Air Consulting

Similar documents
Secondary Aluminum NESHAP 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart RRR. Example Malfunction Plan for Plant ABC

Proposed Uniform Standards for Equipment Leaks

O&M MANUAL HIGHLIGHTS

BSR GPTC Z TR GM References and Reporting Page 1 of 8

Ohio EPA. Division of Air Pollution Control. Engineering Guide #78. (also known as DSIWM Guidance Document #1001 and #1002)

Requirements for Reduced Supervision of Power Plants, Thermal Liquid Heating Systems, and Heating Plants

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY IN THE WORKPLACE

Hazardous Energy Control

AMERICAN AVENUE LANDFILL KERMAN, CA

IDEM Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Land Quality P.O. Box 6015 Indianapolis, IN OLQ PH: (317)

COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN

CCR Certification: Fugitive Dust Control Plan (b) for the. West Ash Pond. at the. F. B. Culley Generating Station.

New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission CFR 49 Part 192 Regulations. MINIMUM Pipeline Safety Regulations

University of Vermont Department of Physical Plant Burlington, Vermont

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

Control of Hazardous Energy Lockout / Tagout Program

FAQs: Confined Spaces in Residential Construction

Isolation and Lockout

E2.14 Control of Hazardous Energy. Effective Date: 03/01/2018

WESTERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY LOCKOUT/TAGOUT PROCEDURE S-107

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

ACCREDITATION OF ON-LINE LEAK SEAL ORGANIZATIONS

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Hazardous Waste Training Plan. Supersedes: 02/15/16 (Rev.02) Preparer: Owner: Approver: EHS Team Member EHS Team Member EHS Manager

Lockout/Tagout Plan Environmental Health & Safety Office July 2017

Lockout/Tagout - Control of Hazardous Energy Program

Requirements for the Ethylene MACT

Information Sheet Guidance For IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

General Inspection Guidance for Waste Management Units Requiring Air Emission Controls Under RCRA Air Standard Subpart CC

21 CFR Part 56 - Institutional Review Boards

CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY (LOCKOUT/TAG OUT PROGRAM) Washington State University Tri-Cities (all departments)

The Top 10 Human Research Protection Compliance Risks

Veriforce TG CCT 609OP. Training Guide

SOP Institutional Review Board (IRB) Appointments and Membership

MAINTENANCE AND SAFETY OF CNG REFUELLING STATIONS

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

Covered Task 614OP Training Guide Purging Pipeline Facilities with Air or Inert Gas

UTAS EH&S INSTRUCTION No. 036 June 2012 Revision No. 3. Purging of Flammable Gas Equipment and/or Piping (Explosion Hazard)

D.B. Wilson Station CCR Landfill

CHAPTER W-13 - POSSESSION OF WILDLIFE, SCIENTIFIC COLLECTING AND SPECIAL LICENSES INDEX #1300 DEFINITIONS 1 #1301 POSSESSION 1

Subparts AA and BB - The Other RCRA Air Rules. Beginners aabb

CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY LOCKOUT/TAGOUT PROGRAM

OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY PROGRAM. Environmental Health and Safety. Established:

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Process Safety Management Of Highly Hazardous Chemicals OSHA 29 CFR

Confined Space Entry Program

Lockout Tagout Program

Minot State University Institutional Review Board ANNUAL UPDATE/REVISION/PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

Control of Hazardous Energy. Environmental Health and Safety

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER CR&CF RISK UNIT Safe Operating Procedure

To comply with the OHS Act, the responsible manager must carry out and document the following:

ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT HEALTH AND SAFETY MANUAL (LOCKOUT/TAGOUT) 30.0

(y9. &i?r, JUL t Certified-Return Receipt Requested WARNING LE7TER

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

HAZARDOUS WASTE OPERATIONS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE

Emergency Preparedness Developing the Plan

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

230-LOCKOUT/TAGOUT PROGRAM

RiskTopics. Lockout/Tagout October 2017

Safe management of industrial steam and hot water boilers A guide for owners, managers and supervisors of boilers, boiler houses and boiler plant

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Department of the Interior Departmental Manual

! Subpart D - Contingency Plans and Emergency Procedures (40 CFR to ) (EPA regulations adopted by NJDEP); and

THE CITADEL The Military College of South Carolina 171 Moultrie Street Charleston, SC MEMORANDUM 30 June 2017 NUMBER (X)-(Y) CONFINED SPACE

NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

Every things under control High-Integrity Pressure Protection System (HIPPS)

Title: Benzene Awareness Effective Date: 11/14/2014 Control Number: THG_0037 Revision Number: 1 Date: 10/22/2015 Annual Review Completed: 5/13/2015

Recommended Facilitator Notes: (read the following text out-loud to participants while showing this slide)

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Post-Approval Submissions

Institutional Review Board - Restriction s Impo sed

IRB APPLICATION CHECKLIST

SAFETY DIRECTIVE 2.0 DEPARTMENTS AFFECTED. This Administrative Directive shall apply to all Town of Marana departments and employees.

Explosive gas migration monitoring for a sanitary landfill facility.

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Office of Oil and Gas Management

AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016

Standard for Hazardous Waste Management, Compliance Checklist. Sean K. Grady, CHMM Vice President-Principal

AUSTRALIA ARGENTINA CANADA EGYPT NORTH SEA U.S. CENTRAL U.S. GULF. SEMS HAZARD ANALYSIS TRAINING September 29, 2011

[Docket No. FWS R7 NWRS ; FF07R00000 FXRS Obligation

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

1.0 PURPOSE 2.0 SCOPE 3.0 DEFINITIONS. ANSI: American National Standards Institute. CCC: Chemical Control Centre

Confined Space in Construction

Significant Change to Dairy Heat Treatment Equipment and Systems

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

EM385 Construction Safety and Health Certification Course Section 12 Control of Hazardous Energy

SAFE WALKS PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

CCR Closure Plan. CCR Certification: Written Closure Plan (b) & (c) for the. Landfill Sedimentation Pond. A. B. Brown Generating Station

LOCK-OUT/TAG-OUT (LO/TO) SAFETY PROGRAM

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

GSA POLICY ON LOCAL EXHAUST AND OTHER VENTILATION (FUME CUPBOARDS)

MANUFACTURING TECHNICAL INSTRUCTIONS - SAFETY FALL HAZARD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS SERIES & NO. SMI - 157

Energy Control. Suite 2A, 55 Frid Street Hamilton, ON L8P 4M3 office: cell:

Transcription:

Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction Plans Norman L. Morrow

Disclaimer This presentation provides a summary of some SS&M provisions and is not a complete description. Refer to the current Code of Federal Regulations and company legal and regulatory expertise for all regulatory and compliance decision-making. Slide 2

Introduction Per 63.6(f)(1), The non-opacity opacity emission standards set forth in [Part 63] shall apply at all times except during periods of SS&M,... Instead, during SS&M periods, you must achieve the general duty requirements to minimize HAP emissions and correct malfunctions as soon as practicable. Slide 3

You must have a Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan (SSMP) that identifies how you will accomplish the general duty. For Subparts KK (Printing and Publishing) and JJJJ (Paper and Other Web Coating), the SS&M requirements only apply if you are using add-on controls. Slide 4

SS&M and SSMP requirements are in Part 63 Subpart A ( 63.1( 63.1-63.16) ) of the CFR and are referenced from Subparts KK and JJJJ. Originally promulgated 3/16/94. Significantly amended as recently as 5/30/03. Additional amendments proposed July 29, 2005. Still in litigation. Thus, SS&M requirements do change. Slide 5

The SSMP does not become part of your Title V permit, rather your permit must require you to have an SS&M plan. Thus, Title V revision procedures do not apply to SSMP changes. Slide 6

The General Duty 63.6(e)(1)(i) At all times, including periods of SS&M, the O/O must operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control equipment and monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. During a period of SS&M, this general duty to minimize emissions requires that the O/O reduce emissions from the affected source to the greatest extent which is consistent with safety Slide 7

and good air pollution control practices. The general duty to minimize emissions during a period of SS&M does not require the O/O to achieve emission levels that would be required by the applicable standard at other times if this is not consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices, nor does it require the O/O to make any further efforts to reduce emissions if levels required by the applicable standard have been achieved.... [Underlined added 5/30/03] Slide 8

63.6(e)(1)(ii) Malfunctions must be corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in accordance with the SS&M plan required in paragraph (e)(3) of this section. To the extent that an unexpected event arises during a SS&M, an O/O must comply by minimizing emissions during such a SS&M event consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices. Slide 9

What is a Start-up? Subpart A defines start-up as: the setting in operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose. ( 63.2 ) Slide 10

What is Shutdown? Subpart A defines shutdown as: the cessation of operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose. ( 63.2) Slide 11

What is a Malfunction? Subpart A defines malfunction as: any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control and monitoring equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner which causes, or has the potential to cause, the emission limitations in an applicable standard to be exceeded.. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. ( 63.2) Underlined added 5/30/03. Slide 12

Thus, since May 2003, SS&M requirements only apply to upsets which are sudden, infrequent, not reasonably preventable and which exceed or have the potential to exceed normal emission limits. The emission limits in Subparts KK and JJJJ apply to other upsets. Slide 13

In the Subparts KK and JJJJ, the criteria for identifying an exceedance was specified in the rule or established by the source in their monitoring plan submission as part of the compliance status report. Slide 14

Where the emission limitation is expressed in terms of control requirements (e.g., route to oxidizer, destroy 95%), malfunctions typically only happen if the control does not meet requirements (e.g., outside 3 hour temperature limit) or there is a capture system failure or bypass. Slide 15

What Equipment is Covered by the SS&M Provisions? SS&M requirements apply to: Processes or portions thereof. Controls and monitors. Slide 16

SSMP Schedule The SSMP must be in place by the compliance date. You must update your SSMP within 45 days if there is a malfunction that is not covered by the existing plan. [ 63.6(e)(3)(viii)] Slide 17

Otherwise, there is no formal requirement to regularly update the SSMP, but 63.6(e)(3)(viii) says: The owner or operator may periodically revise the SS&M plan for the affected source as necessary to satisfy the requirements of this part or to reflect changes in equipment or procedures at the affected source.... Slide 18

And EPA has stated that such updating is a criteria in deciding if a plan is adequate. the general duty to minimize emissions requires that owners or operators review their SSMP on an ongoing basis and make appropriate improvements to ensure that excess emissions are avoided. [68 FR 32590, May 30, 2003]. Slide 19

EPA takes the position that following an inadequate SS&M plan does not meet the general duty requirement.... compliance with an inadequate or improperly developed SSM plan is no defense for failing to minimize emissions. (66 FR 16327, March 23, 2001) Slide 20

If the EPA or permitting authority determine the procedures in an SSMP do not adequately address the general duty or are otherwise inadequate they can require you to change them. ( 63.6(e)(3)(vii)) Slide 21

SSMP Content The only specific SSMP content requirements are in 63.6(e)(3)(i). Describe, in detail,, the procedures for operating and maintaining the source during SS&M periods. Describe a program of corrective actions for malfunctioning process, air pollution control and monitoring equipment. Slide 22

Remembering that achieving the General Duty is the goal, the procedures should focus on minimizing excess emission (magnitude and duration) and provide for immediate corrective actions when malfunctions occur. Slide 23

The level of detail expected in an SSMP is unclear, but appears to be significantly less than identifying individual operator actions. Rather identification of broad steps (e.g., route start-up purge streams to the flare, immediately notify Maintenance of a monitor malfunction) appear appropriate. Slide 24

Of particular importance is inclusion of any situation where a control device or monitor must be bypassed. Identifying such events in the plan and including steps to minimize emissions during those times can meet the general duty, even if bypassing is necessary. Slide 25

While monitors are expected to operate during SS&M under these subparts, unless they are malfunctioning, controls and monitors may be bypassed when safety or monitor integrity requires, if specified in the SSMP. Slide 26

From: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/alum2nd/alum2pg.html Secondary Aluminum NESHAP 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart RRR Example Malfunction Plan for Plant ABC Final April 3, 2003 This is an example of one way to write a malfunction plan. Citations to Federal requirements found in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) are provided for reference, as applicable. Information Transfer and Program Integration Division Office of Air Quality Planning Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

This is an example malfunction plan and it is not intended to be used for regulatory purposes. Citations to Federal requirements found in Title 40 of the CFR are provided for reference, as applicable. 5-5 Loss of Utilities: Power, Gas, Water, etc. (as applicable to facility equipment) Ensure that the situation has become stable and the hazards have been cleared before proceeding further. Confirm the system status and note which equipment is off-line or otherwise impaired. Notify appropriate maintenance or other responsible personnel (see Section 5-8). Respond to correct or repair the malfunction in a safe, efficient and timely manner as soon as it is practicable, for example: a Call power company or 911 if power failure seems plant-wide; if not, trace power failure from equipment to power source; b Check source of gas or water; c Trace gas or water line from equipment to the source and determine whether any leaks or breaks in line exist; and d Repair any breaks or leaks that are found in the utility system at the facility. Suspend operations as soon as practicable until compliance can be assured if failure cannot be repaired in a timely manner. Record pertinent information (see Section 5-7) on record sheets (see Section 5-9) to log date, time, duration, cause of malfunction, and corrective action taken. Make sure to record whether the Malfunction Plan was followed for each event. Submit the Malfunction Report Form to the appropriate Plant ABC personnel (see Section 5-8). Plant ABC Malfunction Plan

This is an example malfunction plan and it is not intended to be used for regulatory purposes. Citations to Federal requirements found in Title 40 of the CFR are provided for reference, as applicable. 5-6 Sudden and Unavoidable Failure of Equipment* (not due to poor operation or maintenance) Ensure that the situation has become stable and the hazards have been cleared before proceeding further. Confirm the system status and note which equipment is off-line or otherwise impaired. Notify appropriate maintenance or other responsible personnel. Respond to correct or repair the malfunction in a safe, efficient and timely manner as soon as it is practicable, for example: a Replace deficient part, if spares are available; and b Call maintenance for assistance if needed. Suspend operations as soon as practicable until compliance can be assured if failure cannot be repaired in a timely manner. Record pertinent information on record sheets (attached) to log date, time, duration, cause of malfunction, and corrective action taken. Record whether the Malfunction Plan was followed for each event. * Such as sudden fan failure, lime feeder failure, broken salt feeder, numerous simultaneous bag breaks/leaks, etc. Plant ABC Malfunction Plan

This is an example malfunction plan and it is not intended to be used for regulatory purposes. Citations to Federal requirements found in Title 40 of the CFR are provided for reference, as applicable. 5-9 Plant ABC Malfunction Report Form Date: Malfunctioning device: Time malfunction began (estimated): Time malfunction ended: Total duration of malfunction: hours minutes Suspected cause of malfunction: Corrective action(s) taken: Was this malfunction covered by the Malfunction Plan? Yes No Were your actions consistent with the Plant ABC Malfunction Plan during the malfunction? Yes No If your actions were not consistent with the Plant ABC Malfunction Plan during the malfunction, explain why you took other actions: Have you reported your actions that were not consistent with the Plant ABC Malfunction Plan to the proper authorities by telephone or FAX within 2 working days of the event and sent a letter within 7 working days of the event? Do you believe that any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances occurred during the malfunction? Yes No Which, if any, units were shut down because of malfunction: Do you have any suggestions for future events like the one that occurred? Your name: Your signature: Name of Supervisor on duty during malfunction: Comments of Supervisor: Signature of Supervisor: Plant ABC Malfunction Plan

Public Review of SSMPs Under the May 2003 amendment of 63.6(e)(3)(v), SSMPs are available to the public on request to the permitting authority. On July 29, 2005 EPA proposed to remove this provision and rely on local authority if there is a need for the public to review SSMPs. Slide 31

Use of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Use of SOPs (or other existing procedures) is allowed, instead of having a separate SSMP. ( 63.6(e)(3)(vi))( 63.6(e)(3)(vi)). While low burden, there are several downsides to using this approach that should be considered. Slide 32

SOPs may not focus on minimizing excess emissions and thus could be considered inadequate. The chance of deviating from an SOP s typically detailed requirements is high. Recordkeeping to assure the plan is followed could be extensive. Slide 33

A Typical SSMP Organization Cover page with approval signature(s) and date. While not required, approval signatures help obtain operator buy-in and verify the authenticity of the plan and management support of the plan. Slide 34

Affected facility identification and identification of NESHAP(s) addressed by the plan. Process overview and identification of regulated emission points and their control devices and monitors. Slide 35

Description of start-up and shutdown periods and tabulation of procedures that will be followed. Description of potential malfunctions and tabulation of procedures that will be followed. Slide 36

Recordkeeping requirements and forms. Reporting requirements and forms. Appendices: Checklists (if used). Personnel and notification lists. Optional content items Slide 37

Recordkeeping and reporting information and forms are often included in SSMPs, but can easily be put into other documents that are more clearly not subject to the SSM plan administrative provisions. Slide 38

It is also common to include lists of responsible and contact individuals, phone lists, etc. in SSMPs Since changes to such lists are common, these too, may be best contained in other documents. Similarly, recordkeeping and reporting associated with changes can be minimized by identifying positions rather than individuals. Slide 39

Recordkeeping Overview Records are required to: Identify SS&M periods. Identify exceedance periods. Confirm that the SSMP was followed. Identify cases where the SSMP was not followed. Provide other required information. Provide information for reports. Slide 40

A checklist to be filled out by Operations is usually the starting point for meeting the record requirements and serves as the primary event record. The checklist is often included in the SSMP and thus its use and revision is subject to the SSMP requirements. Slide 41

Summary of Subpart A SS&M Records 63.6(e)(3)(v) You must keep a copy of your SSMP for as long as you continue to operate your NESHAP process plus five years. If your SSMP is revised, you must also keep the previous version(s) for five years. Slide 42

63.6(e)(3)(iii) You must keep records for every SS&M event to demonstrate if you followed the SSMP and to record any actions not consistent with the SSMP. Typically a checklist is used. Slide 43

63.10(b) (i) Record the occurrence and duration of each SS&M of process equipment; (ii) Record the occurrence and duration of each malfunction of required air pollution control and monitoring equipment; Slide 44

(iv) Record actions taken during periods of SS&M which are different from the SSMP procedures; (v) Record information necessary to demonstrate conformance with the SSMP when all actions taken are consistent with the procedures specified in the plan. Slide 45

63.10(c) For Sources Monitored with a Continuous Monitoring System (1) Record of all required CMS measurements (including monitoring data recorded during unavoidable CMS breakdowns and out-of of- control periods); Slide 46

Reporting The May 2003 subpart A amendment of 63.6(e)(3)(viii) requires, that you report in your next semi-annual report if you have revised your SSMP. Slide 47

Also, if the revisions change the scope of activities considered to be SS&M, or change how any emission limit, work practice requirement, or other requirement in your NESHAP applies, the revised SSMP is not effective until the permitting authority has received written notice from you describing the revisions. Slide 48

63.10(d)(5)(i) requires a SS&M periodic report and specifies its content, schedule, etc. For Subparts KK and JJJJ this report may be included with the periodic compliance report. Where all SS&M events were handled consistent with the SSMP, the report must include a statement to that effect. Slide 49

Where actions for any event were not consistent with the SSMP that must be reported. Whether or not there were exceedances. Specific information listed in 63.10(d)(5) is required for each malfunction that occurred during the reporting period. Note: Each SS&M reportable will also need to be reviewed for possible reporting under Title V. Slide 50

63.10(d)(5)(ii) requires immediate reporting where there was an exceedance and the SSMP was not followed. Immediate reporting means a call or fax within 2 days, followed by a letter within 7 days. Slide 51