MORE THAN ONE INSERTION LOSS, THROUGHOUT THE DAY, FOR THE SAME OUTDOOR NOISE BARRIER

Similar documents
Meteorology & Air Pollution. Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun

Sea and Land Breezes METR 4433, Mesoscale Meteorology Spring 2006 (some of the material in this section came from ZMAG)

EVE 402/502 Air Pollution Generation and Control. Introduction. Intro, cont d 9/18/2015. Chapter #3 Meteorology

Influence of non-standard atmospheric conditions on turbine noise levels near wind farms

Meteorological influences on the noise reduction potential of forests

Full Classification acc. to IEC for SoDAR AQ510 Wind Finder. Vincent Camier, Managing Director, Ammonit Measurement GmbH

Uncertainties in Environmental Noise Assessments ISO 1996, Effects of Instrument Class and Residual Sound

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

Criteria for wind farm noise: Lmax and Lden

INFLUENCE OF TRAFFIC FLOW SEPARATION DEVICES ON ROAD SAFETY IN BRAZIL S MULTILANE HIGHWAYS

1. Atmospheric Diffusion of Stack Gases

Earmuff Comfort Evaluation

M. Mikkonen.

Meteorology. Circle the letter that corresponds to the correct answer

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE PROJECT INTRODUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION NOISE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS...

Measurements of atmospheric CO 2 concentrations along a transect

A noise generation and propagation model for large wind farms

OPERATIONAL USE OF A WIND PROFILER FOR AVIATION METEOROLOGY ABSTRACT

Noise Level Compliance Report

LiDAR Application to resource assessment and turbine control

INTERNATIONAL OIML R 32 RECOMMENDATION. Rotary piston gas meters and turbine gas meters ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION

Lely Aircon LA30 Wind turbine

Lesson: Atmospheric Dynamics

Background noise maps

Wind shear and its effect on wind turbine noise assessment Report by David McLaughlin MIOA, of SgurrEnergy

Influence of wind direction on noise emission and propagation from wind turbines

6.28 PREDICTION OF FOG EPISODES AT THE AIRPORT OF MADRID- BARAJAS USING DIFFERENT MODELING APPROACHES

Rotor Average wind speed for power curve performance. Ioannis Antoniou (LAC), Jochen Cleve (LAC), Apostolos Piperas (LAC)

Transmission loss (TL) can be predicted, to a very rough degree, solely on the basis of a few factors. These factors are range, and frequency.

Melancthon Pits Extension Noise Study Part of West Half of Lots 12 and 14, Concession 3 O.S. Township of Melancthon, County of Dufferin

Dick Bowdler Acoustic Consultant

Wind turbine noise at neighbor dwellings, comparing calculations and measurements

BUILDING REGULATION AND THERMAL COMFORT: THE OPENING TYPOLOGY INFLUENCE ON NATURAL COOLING INSIDE OFFICE BUILDINGS IN MACEIÓ.

MICROPHONE WIND SPEED LIMITS DURING WIND FARM NOISE MEASUREMENTS

Wind tunnel acoustic testing of wind generated noise on building facade elements

Walk - Run Activity --An S and P Wave Travel Time Simulation ( S minus P Earthquake Location Method)

Special edition paper

METEOROLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE PROPAGATION OVER SEVERAL KILOMETRES

ASSESSMENT OF SEA BREEZE CHARACTERISTICS FROM SODAR ECHOGRAMS

Testing and Validation of the Triton Sodar

2.4. Applications of Boundary Layer Meteorology

T10:2012 Site Category 1a) T10:2012 Site Category 1b) Railway Level Crossing Approach Traffic Signal Approach Event Code F Event Code E

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 to include ACSF > 10 km/h

Wednesday, September 20, 2017 Reminders. Week 3 Review is now available on D2L (through Friday) Exam 1, Monday, September 25, Chapters 1-4

Row / Distance from centerline, m. Fan side Distance behind spreader, m 0.5. Reference point. Center line

Section 3: Atmospheric Circulation

TUNNEL KASTELEC - PLANING, REALISATION, TESTING, EXPERIENCES

Vortex Flow Meter Wafer or Flange Connection. - Steam - Liquid - Gas

Paper 2.2. Operation of Ultrasonic Flow Meters at Conditions Different Than Their Calibration

Cycle lane network to connect the different campuses of Technical University of Cartagena (Spain)

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

Ciência e Natura ISSN: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil

Certification of AMS acc. EN 15267, Part 3 - Overview and First Experience -

Observed Roughness Lengths for Momentum and Temperature on a Melting Glacier Surface

Investigation on Deep-Array Wake Losses Under Stable Atmospheric Conditions

Modelling atmospheric stability with CFD: The importance of tall profiles

Similarly to elastic waves, sound and other propagated waves are graphically shown by the graph:

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE FLOW BEHAVIOUR IN A MODERN TRAFFIC TUNNEL IN CASE OF FIRE INCIDENT

The dynamics of heat lows over flat terrain

Application of the numerical model SWAN in locations with vegetation in the Tiete-Paraná waterway Lake of Ilha Solteira s Dam Brazil

Comparison of NWP wind speeds and directions to measured wind speeds and directions

Influences on Weather and Climate Weather and Climate. Coriolis Effect

Janek LAANEARU and Aleksander KLAUSON Department of Mechanics, Tallinn University of Technology

IVAO International Virtual Aviation Organization Training department

Professor Alan H. Stein November 10, 2004

Module 03 Accident modeling, risk assessment and management Lecture 04 Explosions

ASX 176 Axial Pressure regulator

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF EFFECT OF URBAN GEOMETRY LAYOUTS ON WIND AND NATURAL VENTILATION UNDER MEDITERRANEAN CLIMATE

The effect of close proximity, low height barriers on railway noise

Study on wind turbine arrangement for offshore wind farms

LOW LAYER WIND SHEAR OVER DAKAR

Chapter 2. Turbulence and the Planetary Boundary Layer

OFFICE OF THE ATHLETICS CANADA COMMISSIONER IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL. between. and ***** OPERATIVE DECISION

Meteorology. Circle the letter that corresponds to the correct answer

Hand Arm and Whole Body vibrations exposure- directive and standard

Standard Measuring Equipment. Helideck Monitoring System (HMS)

An Employee-Owned Company

EFFECTS OF OCEAN THERMAL STUCTURE ON FISH FINDING WITH SONAR

Air Sensor. SAC Ex. Manual ATEX. AQ Elteknik AB

Flow modelling hills complex terrain and other issues

Adiabatic Lapse Rates and Atmospheric Stability

Fontes Renováveis Não-Convencionais. Parte II

The effect of a common wind shear adjustment methodology on the assessment of wind farms when applying ETSU-R-97

Vertical Motion and Atmospheric Stability

LOCAL WINDS. Prof. Stephan De Wekker Department of Env. Sciences Guest lecture EVSC 1300

Dear Ms. Maw: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment St-Charles Market, 135 Barrette Street, Ottawa GWE File No.

Atmospheric and Ocean Circulation Lab

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

10.6 The Dynamics of Drainage Flows Developed on a Low Angle Slope in a Large Valley Sharon Zhong 1 and C. David Whiteman 2

RIGHT-OF-WAY INTERSECTIONS

Windcube FCR measurements

Blind Ocean Acoustic Tomography

FLOW CONSIDERATIONS IN INDUSTRIAL SILENCER DESIGN

AUSTRIAN RISK ANALYSIS FOR ROAD TUNNELS Development of a new Method for the Risk Assessment of Road Tunnels

INCLINOMETER DEVICE FOR SHIP STABILITY EVALUATION

GEA FOR ADVANCED STRUCTURAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 161 (2016 )

Questionnaire for the theoretical part of education in skydiving. Meteorology

Applying Proper Dispersion Models for Industrial Accidental Releases

Transcription:

MORE THAN ONE INSERTION LOSS, THROUGHOUT THE DAY, FOR THE SAME OUTDOOR NOISE BARRIER Vitor Rosão e Eusébio Conceição Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal. e-mail: vitorrosao@schiu.com Carlos Rosão SCHIU, Engenharia de Vibração e Ruído, Rua de Faro, Bloco B, 2.º Frente, Estoi, 8005-463 Faro, Portugal ISO 10847:1997 establishes a method for determining the insertion loss of noise barriers, assuming the existence of only one insertion loss for the same outdoor noise barrier. Since during the day distinct vertical gradients of sound speed may occur, different curved path radius of the sound rays can be formed, which leads to a different insertion loss throughout the day, for the same noise barrier. This article examines the influence of atmospheric conditions on the insertion loss of noise barriers and suggests how to complement the ISO 10847:1997. 1. Introduction In short ISO 10847 1, 2 defines 2 methods for in situ determination of insertion loss of outdoor noise barriers of all types, for any source type: 1. Direct method: Measurement Before and After the installation of the barrier, at the same point. 2. Indirect method: Measurement After the installation of the barrier, at the desired point and at another point considered equivalent to desired point without the influence of the barrier. ISO 10847 1, 2 states that in the direct method, it must be ensured equivalence of the weather conditions. In terms of wind the measurements, before and after the installation of the barrier, are considered equivalent if Wind Class of Table 1 remains the same. All distances Short distances Wind Class * Only with the case of temperature inversion. Table 1. Wind Class (ISO10847). Downwind Calm Downwind Calm Upwind Vector component of wind velocity +1 a +5 m/s -1 a +1 m/s* +1 a +5 m/s -1 a +1 m/s +1 a -5 m/s ICSV18, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-14 July 2011 1

18 th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-14 July 2011 Short distances conditions are as follows (h s : source height in metres; h r : receiver height in metres; h: barrier height in metres; d 1 : distance between source and barrier in metres; d 2 : distance between barrier and receiver in metres): Before measurement: o (h s +h r )/(d 1 +d 2 )>0,1. After measurement: o (h s +h)/(d 1 )>0,1; o (h+h r )/(d 2 )>0,1. In terms of temperature the measurements, before and after the installation of the barrier, are considered equivalent if the difference does not exceed 10 ºC, and the vertical temperature gradient is similar. In terms of humidity is not stated any threshold, but it indicated the need for similar conditions. In terms of cloudiness the measurements, before and after the installation of the barrier, are considered equivalent if the Class of Cloudiness of Table 2 remains the same. Table 2. Cloud Cover Class (ISO10847). Class Description Heavily overcast day or night (80 % cloud cover or 1 more, for 100% of the measurement time) Moderately overcast day or night (50% to 80% 2 cloud cover for at least 80% of the measurement time) Lightly overcast or sunny day or night (either with 3 continuous sun or less than 50% cloud cover for at least 80% of the measurement time) 4 Clear night Considering the foregoing, it appears that ISO 10847 1, 2 does not recommend that ensures representativeness of the Insertion-Loss of noise barriers, for example on annual average (may be also in terms of average in a critical month or day, depending on the requirement of law or otherwise), since are given guarantees of meteorological equivalence, in Before and After measurements, but no guarantees are given that these weather conditions are truly representative of the situation. 2. and unfavorable conditions of sound propagation In accordance with Annex B of NF S31-133 3, we have that a measurement during day period with strong solar radiation, dry surface and downwind medium to weak, or strong wind little favorable (45º) such configuration is allowed by ISO 10847 1, 2, as explained above, for any distance corresponds to an Unfavorable/Homogeneous sound propagation situation. A measurement at night which is also allowed under ISO 10847 1, 2, as explained above corresponds, in accordance with Annex B of NF S31-133 3, to a sound propagation situation. In the circumstances described, are summarized in Figure 1 and Figure 2, for comparison, the Cross Section Noise Maps (mesh calculation of 1 1 m 2 ), obtained in the software Cadna A/NMPB '96 4 for a traffic road, with and without the effect of 4 meters height noise barrier, 2

18 th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-14 July 2011 respectively for Homogeneous and conditions of sound propagation, on flat terrain with 0.8 sound absorption coefficient, up to a distance of 20 meters. The results for 1 m and 4 m height above ground, extended to a distance of 200 meters, are presented in Table 3. Figure 1. Cross Section Noise Maps With (a) and (b) noise barrier, for favorable conditions (up to 20 metres) (NMPB 96). Figure 2. Cross Section Noise Maps With (a) and (b) noise barrier, for homogeneous conditions (up to 20 metres) (NMPB 96). 3

Distance to road [m] 18 th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-14 July 2011 4 Table 3. : Example of different insertion-loss for the same noise barrier (up to 200 metres) (NMPB'96). With With difference Height above ground [m] 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 83 71 83 71 0 0 83 71 83 71 0 0 0 0 2 76 71 76 71 0 0 76 71 76 71 0 0 0 0 3 73 70 73 70 0 0 72 70 72 70 0 0 0 0 4 71 69 71 68 0 1 70 69 70 69 0 0 0-1 5 69 69 50 57 19 12 69 68 49 56 20 12 1 0 6 68 68 50 56 18 12 68 68 49 54 19 14 1 2 7 67 67 50 54 17 13 67 67 48 53 19 14 2 1 8 67 67 49 54 18 13 66 66 48 52 18 14 0 1 9 66 66 49 53 17 13 65 66 48 51 17 15 0 2 10 65 66 48 52 17 14 65 65 47 50 18 15 1 1 11 65 65 48 52 17 13 64 65 47 49 17 16 0 3 12 64 65 48 51 16 14 63 65 47 49 16 16 0 2 13 64 64 47 51 17 13 63 64 46 48 17 16 0 3 14 63 64 47 50 16 14 62 64 46 48 16 16 0 2 15 63 64 46 50 17 14 62 63 46 48 16 15-1 1 16 63 63 46 49 17 14 61 63 45 47 16 16-1 2 17 62 63 46 49 16 14 61 63 45 47 16 16 0 2 18 62 63 46 49 16 14 60 62 45 46 15 16-1 2 19 62 63 45 48 17 15 60 62 45 46 15 16-2 1 20 61 62 45 48 16 14 60 62 44 46 16 16 0 2 21 61 62 45 48 16 14 59 62 44 46 15 16-1 2 22 61 62 44 47 17 15 59 61 44 45 15 16-2 1 23 62 62 44 47 18 15 58 61 44 45 14 16-4 1 24 60 61 44 47 16 14 58 61 43 45 15 16-1 2 25 60 61 44 47 16 14 58 61 43 45 15 16-1 2 26 60 61 43 46 17 15 58 60 43 44 15 16-2 1 27 60 61 43 46 17 15 57 60 43 44 14 16-3 1 28 59 61 43 46 16 15 57 60 43 44 14 16-2 1 29 59 60 43 46 16 14 57 60 42 44 15 16-1 2 30 59 60 43 45 16 15 56 60 42 43 14 17-2 2 31 59 60 42 45 17 15 56 59 42 43 14 16-3 1 32 58 60 42 45 16 15 56 59 42 43 14 16-2 1 33 58 60 42 45 16 15 56 59 42 43 14 16-2 1 34 58 60 42 45 16 15 55 59 42 43 13 16-3 1 35 58 59 42 44 16 15 55 59 41 43 14 16-2 1 36 58 59 41 44 17 15 55 58 41 42 14 16-3 1 37 57 59 41 44 16 15 55 58 41 42 14 16-2 1 38 57 59 41 44 16 15 55 58 41 42 14 16-2 1 39 57 59 41 44 16 15 54 58 41 42 13 16-3 1 40 57 59 41 44 16 15 54 58 41 42 13 16-3 1 41 57 59 41 43 16 16 54 58 41 42 13 16-3 0 42 57 58 41 43 16 15 54 58 40 42 14 16-2 1 43 57 58 40 43 17 15 54 57 40 41 14 16-3 1 44 56 58 40 43 16 15 53 57 40 41 13 16-3 1 45 56 58 40 43 16 15 53 57 40 41 13 16-3 1 46 56 58 40 43 16 15 53 57 40 41 13 16-3 1 47 56 58 40 43 16 15 53 57 40 41 13 16-3 1 48 56 58 40 42 16 16 53 57 40 41 13 16-3 0

Distance to road [m] 18 th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-14 July 2011 With With difference Height above ground [m] 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 49 56 58 39 42 17 16 52 57 40 41 12 16-5 0 50 56 57 39 42 17 15 52 56 40 41 12 15-5 0 51 55 57 39 42 16 15 52 56 39 40 13 16-3 1 52 55 57 39 42 16 15 52 56 39 40 13 16-3 1 53 55 57 39 42 16 15 52 56 39 40 13 16-3 1 54 55 57 39 42 16 15 52 56 39 40 13 16-3 1 55 55 57 39 42 16 15 51 56 39 40 12 16-4 1 56 55 57 39 41 16 16 51 56 39 40 12 16-4 0 57 55 57 38 41 17 16 51 55 39 40 12 15-5 -1 58 55 57 38 41 17 16 51 55 39 40 12 15-5 -1 59 54 57 38 41 16 16 51 55 39 40 12 15-4 -1 60 54 56 38 41 16 15 51 55 38 39 13 16-3 1 61 54 56 38 41 16 15 51 55 38 39 13 16-3 1 62 54 56 38 41 16 15 50 55 38 39 12 16-4 1 63 54 56 38 41 16 15 50 55 38 39 12 16-4 1 64 54 56 38 41 16 15 50 55 38 39 12 16-4 1 65 54 56 38 41 16 15 50 55 38 39 12 16-4 1 66 54 56 37 40 17 16 50 54 38 39 12 15-5 -1 67 54 56 37 40 17 16 50 54 38 39 12 15-5 -1 68 54 56 37 40 17 16 50 54 38 39 12 15-5 -1 69 54 56 37 40 17 16 50 54 38 39 12 15-5 -1 70 54 56 37 40 17 16 49 54 38 39 11 15-6 -1 71 53 56 37 40 16 16 49 54 37 38 12 16-4 0 72 53 55 37 40 16 15 49 54 37 38 12 16-4 1 73 53 55 37 40 16 15 49 54 37 38 12 16-4 1 74 53 55 37 40 16 15 49 54 37 38 12 16-4 1 75 53 55 37 40 16 15 49 53 37 38 12 15-4 0 76 53 55 37 39 16 16 49 53 37 38 12 15-4 -1 77 53 55 36 39 17 16 49 53 37 38 12 15-5 -1 78 53 55 36 39 17 16 48 53 37 38 11 15-6 -1 79 53 55 36 39 17 16 48 53 37 38 11 15-6 -1 80 53 55 36 39 17 16 48 53 37 38 11 15-6 -1 81 53 55 36 39 17 16 48 53 37 38 11 15-6 -1 82 53 55 36 39 17 16 48 53 36 38 12 15-5 -1 83 53 55 36 39 17 16 48 53 36 38 12 15-5 -1 84 53 55 36 39 17 16 48 52 36 37 12 15-5 -1 85 53 55 36 39 17 16 48 52 36 37 12 15-5 -1 86 52 54 36 39 16 15 48 52 36 37 12 15-4 0 87 52 54 36 39 16 15 48 52 36 37 12 15-4 0 88 52 54 36 39 16 15 47 52 36 37 11 15-5 0 89 52 54 36 39 16 15 47 52 36 37 11 15-5 0 90 52 54 36 38 16 16 47 52 36 37 11 15-5 -1 91 52 54 35 38 17 16 47 52 36 37 11 15-6 -1 92 52 54 35 38 17 16 47 52 36 37 11 15-6 -1 93 52 54 35 38 17 16 47 51 36 37 11 14-6 -2 94 52 54 35 38 17 16 47 51 35 37 12 14-5 -2 95 52 54 35 38 17 16 47 51 35 37 12 14-5 -2 96 52 54 35 38 17 16 47 51 35 37 12 14-5 -2 97 52 54 35 38 17 16 47 51 35 37 12 14-5 -2 98 52 54 35 38 17 16 47 51 35 36 12 15-5 -1 99 52 54 35 38 17 16 47 51 35 36 12 15-5 -1 5

Distance to road [m] 18 th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-14 July 2011 With With difference Height above ground [m] 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 100 52 54 35 38 17 16 46 51 35 36 11 15-6 -1 101 52 54 35 38 17 16 46 51 35 36 11 15-6 -1 102 52 53 34 38 18 15 46 51 35 36 11 15-7 0 103 51 53 34 37 17 16 46 50 35 36 11 14-6 -2 104 51 53 34 37 17 16 46 50 35 36 11 14-6 -2 105 51 53 34 37 17 16 46 50 35 36 11 14-6 -2 106 51 53 34 37 17 16 46 50 35 36 11 14-6 -2 107 51 53 34 37 17 16 46 50 34 36 12 14-5 -2 108 51 53 34 37 17 16 46 50 34 36 12 14-5 -2 109 51 53 34 37 17 16 46 50 34 36 12 14-5 -2 110 51 53 34 37 17 16 46 50 34 36 12 14-5 -2 111 51 53 34 37 17 16 46 50 34 36 12 14-5 -2 112 51 53 34 37 17 16 46 50 34 36 12 14-5 -2 113 51 53 34 37 17 16 45 49 34 36 11 13-6 -3 114 51 53 34 37 17 16 45 49 34 35 11 14-6 -2 115 51 53 34 37 17 16 45 49 34 35 11 14-6 -2 116 51 53 34 37 17 16 45 49 34 35 11 14-6 -2 117 51 53 34 37 17 16 45 49 34 35 11 14-6 -2 118 51 53 34 37 17 16 45 49 34 35 11 14-6 -2 119 51 53 33 37 18 16 45 49 34 35 11 14-7 -2 120 51 52 33 36 18 16 45 49 34 35 11 14-7 -2 121 51 52 33 36 18 16 45 49 34 35 11 14-7 -2 122 51 52 33 36 18 16 45 49 34 35 11 14-7 -2 123 50 52 33 36 17 16 45 49 33 35 12 14-5 -2 124 50 52 33 36 17 16 45 49 33 35 12 14-5 -2 125 50 52 33 36 17 16 45 49 33 35 12 14-5 -2 126 50 52 33 36 17 16 45 48 33 35 12 13-5 -3 127 50 52 33 36 17 16 45 48 33 35 12 13-5 -3 128 50 52 33 36 17 16 45 48 33 35 12 13-5 -3 129 50 52 33 36 17 16 44 48 33 35 11 13-6 -3 130 50 52 33 36 17 16 44 48 33 35 11 13-6 -3 131 50 52 33 36 17 16 44 48 33 35 11 13-6 -3 132 50 52 33 36 17 16 44 48 33 34 11 14-6 -2 133 50 52 33 36 17 16 44 48 33 34 11 14-6 -2 134 50 52 33 36 17 16 44 48 33 34 11 14-6 -2 135 50 52 33 36 17 16 44 48 33 34 11 14-6 -2 136 50 52 33 36 17 16 44 48 33 34 11 14-6 -2 137 50 52 32 36 18 16 44 48 33 34 11 14-7 -2 138 50 52 32 36 18 16 44 48 33 34 11 14-7 -2 139 50 52 32 35 18 17 44 47 33 34 11 13-7 -4 140 50 52 32 35 18 17 44 47 33 34 11 13-7 -4 141 50 52 32 35 18 17 44 47 32 34 12 13-6 -4 142 50 52 32 35 18 17 44 47 32 34 12 13-6 -4 143 50 51 32 35 18 16 44 47 32 34 12 13-6 -3 144 50 51 32 35 18 16 44 47 32 34 12 13-6 -3 145 50 51 32 35 18 16 44 47 32 34 12 13-6 -3 146 49 51 32 35 17 16 44 47 32 34 12 13-5 -3 147 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 47 32 34 11 13-6 -3 148 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 47 32 34 11 13-6 -3 149 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 47 32 34 11 13-6 -3 150 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 47 32 34 11 13-6 -3 6

Distance to road [m] 18 th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-14 July 2011 With With difference Height above ground [m] 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 151 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 47 32 34 11 13-6 -3 152 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 47 32 33 11 14-6 -2 153 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 47 32 33 11 14-6 -2 154 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 47 32 33 11 14-6 -2 155 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 47 32 33 11 14-6 -2 156 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 46 32 33 11 13-6 -3 157 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 46 32 33 11 13-6 -3 158 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 46 32 33 11 13-6 -3 159 49 51 32 35 17 16 43 46 32 33 11 13-6 -3 160 49 51 31 35 18 16 43 46 32 33 11 13-7 -3 161 49 51 31 35 18 16 43 46 32 33 11 13-7 -3 162 49 51 31 34 18 17 43 46 32 33 11 13-7 -4 163 49 51 31 34 18 17 43 46 31 33 12 13-6 -4 164 49 51 31 34 18 17 43 46 31 33 12 13-6 -4 165 49 51 31 34 18 17 43 46 31 33 12 13-6 -4 166 49 51 31 34 18 17 43 46 31 33 12 13-6 -4 167 49 51 31 34 18 17 43 46 31 33 12 13-6 -4 168 49 51 31 34 18 17 43 46 31 33 12 13-6 -4 169 49 51 31 34 18 17 42 46 31 33 11 13-7 -4 170 49 51 31 34 18 17 42 46 31 33 11 13-7 -4 171 49 51 31 34 18 17 42 46 31 33 11 13-7 -4 172 49 51 31 34 18 17 42 46 31 33 11 13-7 -4 173 49 50 31 34 18 16 42 46 31 33 11 13-7 -3 174 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 175 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 176 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 177 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 178 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 179 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 180 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 181 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 182 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 183 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 184 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 185 48 50 31 34 17 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-6 -3 186 48 50 30 34 18 16 42 45 31 32 11 13-7 -3 187 48 50 30 34 18 16 42 45 30 32 12 13-6 -3 188 48 50 30 33 18 17 42 45 30 32 12 13-6 -4 189 48 50 30 33 18 17 42 45 30 32 12 13-6 -4 190 48 50 30 33 18 17 42 45 30 32 12 13-6 -4 191 48 50 30 33 18 17 42 45 30 32 12 13-6 -4 192 48 50 30 33 18 17 42 45 30 32 12 13-6 -4 193 48 50 30 33 18 17 42 45 30 32 12 13-6 -4 194 48 50 30 33 18 17 42 44 30 32 12 12-6 -5 195 48 50 30 33 18 17 41 44 30 32 11 12-7 -5 196 48 50 30 33 18 17 41 44 30 32 11 12-7 -5 197 48 50 30 33 18 17 41 44 30 32 11 12-7 -5 198 48 50 30 33 18 17 41 44 30 31 11 13-7 -4 199 48 50 30 33 18 17 41 44 30 31 11 13-7 -4 200 48 50 30 33 18 17 41 44 30 31 11 13-7 -4 7

18 th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-14 July 2011 3. Analysis of results and conclusions The analysis of Table 3 shows that there may be differences in insertion-loss of noise barriers, in the example, for Homogeneous and, between -7 db and 2 db for 1 m height above ground (up to 20 metres the differential is only 2 db), and between -5 db and 3 db for 4 m above ground (up to 130 metres the differential is only 3 db), which means that if the insertion-loss of the noise barrier meet the legal limits near the limit at 2 / 3 db which often happens must be taken some caution in determining the average insertion-loss, or minimum insertion-loss, because it is not even guaranteed that measurements at night lead to insertion-loss safer (lower) because, as shown on Table 3, the insertion-loss for may be higher or lower than the insertion-loss for Homogeneous, though, for greater distances the insertion-loss tends to be higher in, contrary to common sense. According to the results, the highest insertion-loss for are due to the fact that, under the influence of the Noise, noise levels are virtually equal for Homogeneous and, and without the influence of the Noise noise levels are higher for. These results show how the same noise barrier may have more than one insertion-loss throughout the day, due to daily variation of the vertical gradient of sound speed, consequently is important not only to ensure, as expressed in ISO 10847 1, 2, an equivalence of weather conditions in measurements Before and After implementation of noise barriers, but also ensure that weather conditions characterized are representative of the legal period, or otherwise, that we pretend to characterize, otherwise we might have deviations, according to Table 3, up to 7 db. 4. Suggestions for amendments to ISO 10847 It is suggested therefore that the ISO 10847 1, 2 becomes to include a chapter about the representativeness of insertion-loss characterized, according to the information available for the atmospheric conditions representative of the site, for the legal periods, or others concerned, and should be well considered for inclusion the Annex A of ISO 1996-2 5, because it relies largely on the recommendation of performing measurements under favorable conditions, because they are more stable, however, as shown in Table 3, for further distances the insertion-loss tends to be higher in favorable conditions, and may be of interest to characterize the minimum insertion-loss (or at least other insertion-loss than the maximum) of Noise. REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ISO 10847, Acoustics: In-situ determination of insertion loss of outdoor noise barriers of all types (1997). Vitor Rosão, Desenvolvimentos sobre Métodos de Previsão, Medição, Limitação e Avaliação em Ruído e Vibração Ambiente, Tese Provisória de Doutoramento, Universidade do Algarve, Portugal (2011). NF S31-133, Acoustique. Bruit des infrastructures de transports terrestres. Calcul de l'atténuation du son lors de sa propagation en milieu extérieur, incluant les effets météorologiques (2007). http://www.datakustik.com/en/products/cadnaa/. ISO 1996-2, Acoustics. Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise. Part 2: Determination of environmental noise levels (2007). (NP ISO 1996-2: 2011). 8