Project Mobility - Route 3 South Express Toll Lanes. Industry Day Overview

Similar documents
State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Managed Lanes. Steve Schilke, P.E. Major Projects Unit Head District 1. Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 2016

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Public Hearings

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Crystal City Civic Association September 21, 2016

Northern Virginia Express Lanes Design Challenges and Solutions. IBTTA Maintenance and Roadway Operations Workshop June 25, 2018

Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies

I-95 Express Lanes Fredericksburg Extension (Fred Ex) Public Hearing. September 25, 2017

Project Overview. Rolling Road Widening Fairfax County. Get Involved. Design Public Hearing. Contact Information

I-66 Corridor Improvements Route 15 to I-495. November 2014

I-90 ALLSTON INTERCHANGE A MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT MEPA CONSULTATION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 2014 BRIGHTON HIGH SCHOOL

Fairfax County Parkway Widening Fairfax County

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Fairlington Citizens Association September 12, 2016

Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MEMORANDUM. DATE June 2, 2011

Active Traffic Management and Part-Time Shoulder Use in Montgomery County, PA

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

Institute for Real Estate Management Chapter (IREM) 77 VDOT Northern Virginia Megaprojects September 13, 2017

The I-85 Express Lanes Project NASCIO Recognition Award Nomination

Alternatives Public Workshop

495 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION STUDY COMMENT SUMMARY REPORT JUNE 11, 2018 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

Public Hearing October 21, 2014 University of North Florida Adam W. Herbert University Center Alumni Drive Jacksonville, FL 32224

Virginia Street Bus RAPID Transit Extension Project. Environmental Assessment (EA) Presentation Public Hearing June 22, 2017

I-105 ExpressLanes Project

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I)

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

MDX SR 836/DOLPHIN EXPRESSWAY SOUTHWEST EXTENSION Project Development and Environment PD&E Study Miami-Dade County, Florida

Date: September 7, Project #: Re: Spaulding Youth Center Northfield, NH Property. Traffic Impact Study

Northwest Corridor Project (I-75/I-575) Agenda. Brief Project History. Stakeholder Briefing January 27, Brief Project history

US 1 Express Lanes Public Kick-Off Meeting

Part-time Shoulder Use Guide

Public Hearing Tarrant County. October 11 th, 2012

395 Express Lanes Extension

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Transportation and Air Quality Committee GEL Project Briefing and Update

CHAPTER 3 STUDY AREA OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW

I-25 South Gap Project Monument to Castle Rock

APPENDIX D COST SUMMARY TABLES

US-6 Spanish Fork Fact Finding Study. December 2017

Part-time Shoulder Use Guide

Welcome to the Open House

MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE/OVERALL FINDINGS

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Arlington County Board October 18, 2016

7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

EXHIBIT B-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Phase 1 of the Preferred Alternative

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

405 Express Lanes General Information & Frequently Asked Questions

I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY. September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer

Maywood Town Hall Meeting. May 4, 2016

Legislative Update Williamsburg Residency

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director

Decision on North Waterloo Routing

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement. Cooperating and Participating Agencies Meeting March 19, 2012

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

County of Fairfax, Virginia. Department of Transportation

Crosstown Commons. If You Build It they Will Come Communicating to the Public During Major Construction Projects

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

INTERSTATE 395 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2016

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

Public Information Meeting

Executive Summary June 2015

VDOT I-66 Inside the Beltway Eastbound Widening Environmental Assessment. Staff Recommendations

Purpose and Need Statement

MnPASS System Today and the Future

Giles Run Connector Road

Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study. November 17, SR 90 (SW 8th Street and SW 7th Street) SW 8 th Street/SW 7 th Street PD&E Study 1

In Collaboration with: City of Belton Cass County FHWA Johnson County KDOT MoDOT City of Olathe City of Overland Park

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk Final EIS

FM #: ETDM #: 11241

North Coast Corridor:

Appendix D: Concept Screening

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

IH 20 RANGER HILL PUBLIC MEETING

IH 85 EXPRESS LANES ATLANTA, GA USDOT Congestion Reduction Demonstration Program Grant ($110M)

Washington St. Corridor Study

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Foothill Expressway Improvements Between El Monte and San Antonio

Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study Phase III

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

Chapter 2: Alternatives

Environmental Assessment Findings & Recommendations. Public Hearing November 13, 2014

Mid Rivers Mall Drive Multi-Use Path (Rte. N to MO 364)

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

1. Provide a dedicated westbound approach bus lane at the intersection;

Transcription:

Project Mobility - Route 3 South Express Toll Lanes Industry Day Overview October 15, 2014

Today s Agenda Project Mobility Overview Design Alternatives and Construction Estimates Existing Traffic Congestion/Project Demand Environmental Review and Timetable 2

Project Mobility Overview Project Mobility will provide Express Toll Lanes on Route 3 South Currently exploring both a single, dedicated lane in each direction as well as a two-lane facility that would operate at peak hours northbound in the AM and southbound in the PM 3

Express Toll Lanes Overview Express Toll Lanes (or Managed Lanes as the terms are used interchangeably) are defined as tolled lanes running parallel to existing toll-free general purpose lanes where the toll rate will adjust based upon demand. Only one of two toll setting protocols can be utilized on Express Toll Lanes: Dynamic Pricing : Rates are set in real time based upon current traffic conditions; or Time of Day Pricing : Rates are fixed by hour and adjusted periodically based upon congestion levels. Tolls would be charged to all vehicles using the Express Toll Lanes, except public transit bus service Dynamic Pricing Time of Day Pricing 4

Project Mobility Objectives Mobility Improve travel time reliability along Route 3 South in both the north and south bound directions Safety Improve the safety of the corridor by restoring the shoulder Bus Transit Enhance existing bus transit alternatives and increase ridership Project Delivery Demonstrate the viability of alternative delivery options in Massachusetts and provide opportunity for private investment 5 5

Design Overview Route 3 South Sections 6 6

South Section Exit 11 (Rte. 14) to Exit 14 (Rte. 228) 96 -wide Median 12 Existing Mainline Bridges 5 Existing Local Road Bridges 4 General Purpose Lanes Active Breakdown Lane 7

Middle Section Exit 14 (Rte. 228) to Exit 16 (Rte. 18) 46 96 -wide Existing Median (Varies) 2 Existing Mainline Bridges 3 Existing Local Road Bridges 4-5 General Purpose Lanes Active Breakdown Lane Begins 8

North Section Exit 16 (Rte. 18) to Exit 19 (Burgin Pkwy) Braintree Split 18 -wide Existing Median 9 Existing Mainline Bridges (Rte. 3) 4 Existing Local Road Bridges (over Rte. 3) Complex Interchange at Braintree Split 6 General Purpose Lanes 9

Option 1 Two Reversible Express Toll Lanes Shoulder Shoulder North Section Shoulder Shoulder Express Toll Lane Shoulder General Purpose Lane South / Middle Section 10

Option 2 Single Express Toll Lane in Each Direction Shoulder Shoulder North Section Shoulder Shoulder Express Toll Lane Shoulder General Purpose Lane South / Middle Section 11

Braintree Split Rte. 3/I-93 Southbound Concept Key Issues Close to ½ of northbound Rte. 3 traffic exits to Rte. 128/93 Southbound (SB) Existing high-occupancy vehicle lane on Southeast Expressway must remain Severe ROW constraints on I-93 prohibit extension of toll lane north of Braintree Split Options Continue express toll lane through Braintree Split to Rte. 128/93 SB Provide single express toll lane SB from Southeast Expressway Toll lane coming from Rte. 128/93 SB would likely be reversible 12

Braintree Split Rte. 3/I-93 Southbound Detail Key Features Express toll lane extends through Braintree Split to Rte. 128/93 SB Express toll lane from Southeast Expressway Toll lane coming from Rte. 128/93 would likely be reversible Express toll lanes relieve congestion in general-purpose lanes Less congestion will help mitigate existing weaving issues ❶ Rte. 93 ❷ Exit 19 New Bridge ❶ ❷ Rte. 3 toll lane connection to Rte. 128/93 SB Express toll lane connection to Rte. 3 SB 13

Conceptual Design Cost Estimate * Cost in 2014 dollars Based on typical MassDOT highway and bridge construction 20% construction contingency included 7% engineering cost included *ESTIMATES ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE 14

Conceptual Cost Range by Corridor Section OPTION 1 OPTION 2 ITEMS TWO EXPRESS TOLL LANE REVERSIBLE AT GRADE SINGLE EXPRESS TOLL LANE IN EACH DIRECTION NORTH SECTION MIDDLE SECTION SOUTH SECTION NORTH SECTION MIDDLE SECTION SOUTH SECTION STRUCTURES EXISTING MAINLINE BRIDGES $45.9 $4.4 $46.7 $45.9 $4.7 $47.8 EXISTING LOCAL ROAD BRIDGES $46.1 $22.6 $26.0 $46.1 $23.0 $26.0 NEW BRIDGES $7.9 $0.0 $0.0 $7.9 $0.0 $0.0 CULVERTS $4.0 $3.0 $2.8 $4.0 $3.0 $2.9 RETAINING WALLS $25.2 $6.1 $0.0 $25.2 $8.1 $0.0 STRUCTURES SUBTOTAL: $129.2 $36.1 $75.5 $129.2 $38.8 $76.6 ROADWAY NEW EXPRESS TOLL LANE CONSTRUCTION FULL DEPTH CONSTRUCTION $19.1 $8.7 $38.9 $21.0 $10.6 $45.4 EARTHWORK/EMBANKMENT (20% of Full Depth Const.) $3.8 $1.7 $7.7 $4.1 $2.1 $9.0 DRAINAGE $7.7 $4.3 $13.0 $7.7 $4.3 $13.0 EXISTING RTE. 3 ROADWAY MILL & OVERLAY $0.0 $0.5 $10.2 $0.0 $0.5 $10.2 FULL DEPTH CONSTRUCTION $33.7 $11.5 $5.1 $33.7 $11.5 $5.1 EARTHWORK/EMBANKMENT (20% of Full Depth Const.) $6.7 $2.3 $1.0 $6.7 $2.3 $1.0 LIGHTING & SIGNING $1.5 $0.8 $2.8 $1.5 $0.8 $2.8 UTILITY RELOCATION $3.8 $0.9 $2.0 $3.8 $0.9 $2.0 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (4.5% of Hwy & Bridge Costs) $9.2 $3.0 $7.0 $9.3 $3.2 $7.4 ROADWAY SUBTOTAL: $85.5 $33.6 $87.7 $87.8 $36.1 $95.9 ITS STRUCTURES (AET GANTRIES, HUB BLDG., GATES) $5.7 $5.5 $3.4 $1.6 $2.7 ITS/TOLLING FACILITIES $5.5 $2.5 $7.0 $5.6 $2.6 $7.1 ITS EQUIPMENT $2.0 $1.0 $1.8 $2.9 $1.5 $2.3 TOLLING EQUIPMENT & SOFTWARE $12.6 $9.5 $18.9 $11.2 $8.4 $13.4 TOLLING SIGNING $0.6 $0.3 $0.4 $0.6 $0.2 $0.5 ELECTRICAL $9.2 $5.7 $8.0 $9.2 $5.7 $8.0 ITS, TOLLING, DETECTION SUBTOTAL: $35.5 $22.2 $41.7 $33.0 $20.0 $34.0 ENVIRONMENTAL WETLAND MITIGATION $0.0 $10.0 $15.0 $0.0 $10.0 $15.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT $2.7 $1.5 $5.6 $2.7 $1.5 $5.6 NOISE BARRIERS $15.5 $10.0 $9.7 $15.5 $10.0 $9.7 ENVIRONMENTAL SUBTOTAL: $18.2 $21.5 $30.3 $18.2 $21.5 $30.3 SUBTOTAL: $268.4 $113.4 $235.2 $268.2 $116.4 $236.9 20% CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY $53.6 $22.6 $47.0 $53.6 $23.2 $47.3 ENGINEERING (7% of Const. Cost incl. Contingency) $22.5 $9.5 $19.7 $22.5 $9.7 $19.8 ROW (LAND ACQUISITION) $8.0 $1.5 $0.5 $8.0 $1.5 $0.5 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST BY SECTION: $352.5 $147.0 $302.4 $352.3 $150.8 $304.5 OPTION TOTAL: $801.9 $807.6 15

Daily Traffic Count Data - June 2014 Exit No: Route 3 South of Arterial Daily Traffic (thousands) Number of Lanes * Exit 19 Burgin Parkway 162.7 6 Exit 17 Union Street 149.7 6 Exit 16 Main / Rte. 18 126.1 6 Exit 15 Derby Street 118.1 4 * Exit 14 Hingham / Rte. 228 104.1 4 * Exit 13 Washington Rte. 53 90.9 4 * Exit 12 Church Rte. 139 80.0 4 Exit 11 Congress Rte. 14 80.3 4 * Breakdown lane use during peak hour period 16

Daily Traffic Profiles Peak Traffic Congestion Vehicles 7,000 South of Exit 18 Vehicles 7,000 South of Exit 14 6,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 northbound southbound 2,000 1,000 northbound southbound - 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Hours of the Day - 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Hours of the Day 17

Northbound Hourly Speed Data By Ranking June 2013-July 2014 (Weekdays AM Peak Period) Total hours less than: Exit 16 to 19 Exit 13 to 16 Exit 12 to 13 Exit 10 to 12 Total TT (min) Speed (mph) TT (min) Speed (mph) TT (min) Speed (mph) TT (min) Speed (mph) TT (min) Speed (mph) worst 0 41.6 6.5 46.0 8.5 25.3 8.8 44.4 10.0 71.3 18.6 5th percentile 61 13.0 20.8 15.5 25.1 4.2 53.3 7.1 62.4 39.9 33.2 15th Percentile 182 10.8 24.9 10.5 37.1 3.9 57.7 6.7 66.6 32.2 41.1 25th percentile 304 9.8 27.4 8.2 47.8 3.8 58.7 6.6 67.8 28.5 46.5 50th Percentile 608 6.2 43.5 5.5 71.1 3.7 60.5 6.4 69.6 22.3 59.5 85th Percentile 1,033 4.2 64.0 5.1 76.5 3.5 63.1 6.2 72.0 19.3 68.6 best 1,215 3.6 75.7 4.7 83.0 3.2 70.5 5.6 79.3 17.7 74.8 FF speed 4.2 65.0 6.0 65.0 3.4 65.0 6.8 65.0 20.4 65.0 length 4.5 4.5 6.5 6.5 3.7 3.7 7.4 7.4 22.1 22.1 18

Southbound Hourly Speed Data By Ranking June 2013-July 2014 (Weekdays PM Peak Period) Total hours less than: Exit 18 to 16 Exit 16 to 13 Exit 13 to 12 Exit 12 to 10 Total TT (min) Speed (mph) TT (min) Speed (mph) TT (min) Speed (mph) TT (min) Speed (mph) TT (min) Speed (mph) worst 0 27.6 9.6 52.9 6.6 46.2 7.7 86.0 5.0 103.9 13.4 5th percentile 61 10.2 25.9 9.9 35.3 7.1 49.6 9.5 45.1 36.0 38.6 15th percentile 182 8.8 30.2 7.3 48.0 5.6 63.4 7.1 59.9 28.3 49.2 25th percentile 304 8.2 32.1 6.1 56.7 5.4 66.0 6.8 63.1 26.5 52.5 50th Percentile 608 7.0 37.9 5.6 62.5 5.2 68.7 6.5 66.0 24.6 56.7 85th Percentile 1033 4.4 59.5 5.2 66.5 4.9 71.8 6.2 69.3 21.5 64.9 best 1215 3.6 73.3 4.5 77.0 4.5 78.4 5.2 82.5 18.9 73.7 FF speed 4.1 65.0 5.4 65.0 5.4 65.0 6.6 65.0 21.4 65.0 length 4.4 4.4 5.8 5.8 5.9 5.9 7.1 7.1 23.2 23.2 19

Northbound Speeds Thursday June 19, 2014 20

Northbound Speeds Sunday June 22, 2014 21

Southbound Speeds Thursday June 19, 2014 22

Southbound Speeds Friday June 20, 2014 23

Environmental Process - NEPA Federal Environmental Review Documentation FHWA will identify the type of documentation necessary to comply with NEPA The project will require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or Environmental Assessment (EA) depending on Rightof-Way impacts, wetland impacts and controversy FHWA will document compliance with NEPA at the completion of the EIS with a Record of Decision (ROD) If the project requires an EA, the outcome would be the issuance of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Public involvement will be a large component of the environmental process 24

Environmental Process - MEPA State Environmental Review Documentation The Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) process begins with the filing of an Environmental Notification Form (ENF) The ENF outlines the project and its potential impacts in a broad range of categories The project exceeds thresholds in MEPA and will require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The EIR will be combined with the NEPA document Similar to NEPA, MEPA looks for avoidance and minimization of impacts through alternatives analyses, followed by mitigation for unavoidable impacts 25

Project Mobility Permits ANTICIPATED PERMIT APPROVALS Federal US Coast Guard Bridge Permit for Route 3 over the North River (may be exempt) Section 404 Permit from US Army Corps of Engineers for 10+ acres of wetland impacts Coastal Zone Management Consistency Determination Section 106 compliance and Section 4(f) documentation if needed for historic resource impacts, yet to be determined State: Section 401 Water Quality Certificate Public Waterfront Act (Chapter 91 Waterways License) Mass DEP Variance from the Wetlands Protection Act 26

Indicative Project Timeline 2014 2015 2016 & Beyond Legislative Outreach Preliminary Construction Costs Industry Day MEPA ENF prepared Public Outreach RFI MEPA Environmental Notification Form filed NEPA process initiation RFQ RFP & Formal Procurement ROD (EIS) or FONSI (EA) Permit approvals Financial Close 27