Evaluation Report Teluk Chempedak Oct 2005

Similar documents
BEACH NOURISHMENT COMBINED WITH SIC VERTICAL DRAIN IN MALAYSIA. Claus Brøgger 1 and Poul Jakobsen 2

PRESSURE EQUALISATION MODULES FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY COASTAL PROTECTION

Evaluation of the function of Vertical drains.

MODELING OF FLOW THROUGH A VERTICAL PERFORATED PIPE IN THE BEACH, AND THE MORPHODYNAMIC INTERPRETATION: THE PRESSURE EQUALIZATION MODULE SYSTEM

Julebæk Strand. Effect full beach nourishment

Town of Duck, North Carolina

CHAPTER 281 INFLUENCE OF NEARSHORE HARDBOTTOM ON REGIONAL SEDIMENT TRANSPORT

EROSION MECHANICS OF A CARBONATE- TOMBOLO BEACH IN MIYAKOJIMA ISLAND, OKINAWA PREFECTURE, JAPAN.

Beach profile surveys and morphological change, Otago Harbour entrance to Karitane May 2014 to June 2015

Beach Profiles. Topics. Module 9b Beach Profiles and Crossshore Sediment Transport 3/23/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

Reading Material. Inshore oceanography, Anikouchine and Sternberg The World Ocean, Prentice-Hall

HARBOUR SEDIMENTATION - COMPARISON WITH MODEL

DELAWARE S VULNERABLE COASTAL AREAS. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS and DELAWARE BAY RECONNAISSANCE STUDY

SAND BOTTOM EROSION AND CHANGES OF AN ACTIVE LAYER THICKNESS IN THE SURF ZONE OF THE NORDERNEY ISLAND

ST. JOSEPH PENINSULA, GULF COUNTY, FLORIDA Beach Re-Nourishment and Environmental Enhancement Project RECOMMENDATIONS

Deep-water orbital waves

TITLE: COASTAL EROSION AND LANDFORMS.

Figure 4, Photo mosaic taken on February 14 about an hour before sunset near low tide.

BYPASS HARBOURS AT LITTORAL TRANSPORT COASTS

Beach Nourishment Impact on Beach Safety and Surfing in the North Reach of Brevard County, Florida

APPLICATION OF SHORE PROTECTION SCHEMES IN HORNB^K Mads Peder J0rgensen ' Peer Skaarup 2 Karsten Mangor 3 J0rgen Juhl 4

Jimmy s beach preliminary results

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

Field trip Information folder

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

Request Number IR1-12: Flow Passage. Information Request

Beach Restoration in Okaloosa and Walton Counties. FSBPA Technology Conference Clearwater, FL

Follets Island Nearshore Beach Nourishment Project

SEDIMENT BUDGET OF LIDO OF PELLESTRINA (VENICE) Written by Marcello Di Risio Under the supervision of Giorgio Bellotti and Leopoldo Franco

INTRODUCTION TO COASTAL ENGINEERING

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Appendix E Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis

An Update of Coastal Erosion in Puerto Rico

Nearshore Dredged Material Placement Pilot Study at Noyo Harbor, CA

23- Year Sand Volume Changes at Site 132, 15th Street, Brigantine

Australian Coastal Councils Conference

Chapter 11. Beach Fill and Soft Engineering Structures

Dune Monitoring Data Update Summary: 2013

Table 4. Volumetric Change Rates Pre-Project and Post-Project for the Town of Duck

Artificial headlands for coastal restoration

April 7, Prepared for: The Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency Prepared by: CEAC Solutions Co. Ltd.

Exemplar for Internal Assessment Resource Geography Level 3. Resource title: The Coastal Environment Kaikoura

LAKKOPETRA (GREECE) EUROSION Case Study. Contact: Kyriakos SPYROPOULOS. TRITON Consulting Engineers. 90 Pratinou Str Athens (GREECE)

Nevis. Wise practices for coping with

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FOR ICZM IN POLAND

CHAPTER 134 INTRODUCTION

Chapter 10 Field Survey and Sediment Analysis for the Candidate Site

Building with Nature: Systems Description of Krogen

CLAM PASS RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN BATHYMETRIC MONITORING REPORT NO. 7 Including Interior Bay Dredge Cuts and Tidal Data

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

LITTLE LAGOON & LITTLE LAGOON PASS: RESEARCH UPDATES & DIRECTIONS

LAB: WHERE S THE BEACH

Earth Science Chapter 16 Section 3 Review

Long Term Success and Future Approach of the Captiva and Sanibel Islands Beach Renourishment Program

Long Beach Island Holgate Spit Little Egg Inlet Historical Evolution Introduction Longshore Transport Map, Survey and Photo Historic Sequence

Variation in Beach Profile and Sediment Characteristics at Popham Beach, Phippsburg, ME

IMPACTS OF COASTAL PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON THE COASTS OF CRETE: NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

Nearshore Waves and Erosion Model Quantifying the Coastal Protection Benefits Provided by Natural Habitats

Legal, scientific and engineering aspects of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Poland

Figure 46. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ. A new site was added in the Borough of Seaside Heights (#248).

The Islands. Barbados. A prefeasibility study. R. Drieman M. Hinborch M. Monden E.A.J. Vendrik

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

SACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

Future Condi,ons coastal hazard modeling and mapping

Analyses of Amelander Nourishments. Sander van Rooij

MIKE Release General product news for Marine software products, tools & features. Nov 2018

WATERWAYS AND HARBORS DIVISION Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers. EQUILIBRIUM FLOW AREAS OF INLETS ON SANDY COASTS a

COUPLED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY LAKE CATHIE ESTUARY & COAST

Simulation of hydraulic regime and sediment transport in the Mekong delta coast

TITLE: North Carolina s Changing Shorelines. KEYWORDS: erosion - shorelines - mapping - sustainability

The construction of Deepwater Navigation Channel (DNC) in the Bystry arm of the Danube Delta has started in The whole project provides the

Changes in Beach Profile and Grain Size after Beach Renourishment

Beach Profiles: Monitoring Sea Level Rise. Student Activity Sheet. Name Date Class

Figure 106. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

Coastal protection in future climate

Inlet Management Study for Pass-A-Grille and Bunces Pass, Pinellas County, Florida

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES

Chesil Beach, Dorset UK High energy, shingle coastline. Brighton Beach, Sussex UK Pebble beach

CHAPTER 21 VARIABLE DISPERSION AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE MOVEMENTS OF TRACERS ON BEACHES

Modeling Sediment Transport Along the Upper Texas Coast

Studland Bay Context and Learning Aims

Activity #1: The Dynamic Beach

SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED MANAGEMENT OPTION FOR STOCKTON BEACH APPLICATION OF 2D COASTAL PROCESSES MODELLING

Q1. What are the primary causes/contributors to coastal erosion at Westshore and the concept of longshore / littoral drift.

The Dynamic Coast. Right Place Resources. A presentation about the interaction between the dynamic coast and people

Low-crested offshore breakwaters: a functional tool for beach management

INFLUENCE OF DAMAGED GROINS ON NOURISHED SEASHORE

Impacts of breakwaters and training walls

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Ocean County Profile Site Locations

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the major environments on Mustang Island.

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

Chapter. The Dynamic Ocean

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

Port and Coastal Engineering

Performance of Upham Beach T-Groin Project and Its Impact to the Downdrift Beach

Figure 262. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 279

Transcription:

Evaluation Report Teluk Chempedak Oct 2005 Beach Nourishment combined with the SIC System Hyatt Hotel SIC Skagen Innovation Centre Dr. Alexandrinesvej 75 Dk 9990 Skagen Denmark Phone 00 45 98 44 57 13 Mob 0045 40 40 14 25 Web:www.shore.dk Mail: sic@shore.dk 1

Beach Nourishment project combined with the SIC system in Teluk Chempedak. Weather Conditions. Teluk Chempedak is placed on the East Coast of Malaysia in Kuantan. Wind direction/speed In the Inter Monsoon time from March to October the wind direction primary is southeast. In the monsoon time from October to March the wind direction primary is northeast. The wind speed is less than 10 meter/sec. Rainfall. The rainfall in Kuantan is aprx. 2,5 metre per year. The rainfall can be up to 1,11 metre over 5 days in the monsoon time. Tidal Water. The range of the tidal water is aprx. 2,5 metre. Sediment transport inside the pocket bay. There is no sediment input from the sea in the pocket bay. In the inter-monsoon time the sediment transport direction in the bay is from south to north. In the monsoon time the sediment transport direction in the bay is from north to south. Activities. The beach in front of Hyatt and Sheraton hotel is pre-drained with the SIC system in July 2003. The beach is nourished with 177.000 m 3 sand from May to July 2004. After the nourishment, the beach is drained again with the SIC System. Survey. The Beach profile is surveyed three times a year in October, March and July. Evaluation. Stabilizing period. After the beach nourishment is done from May to July 2004, the beach is stabilized in the period from July to October in an equilibrium profile. Already in October 2004 the beach has found the new equilibrium profile. The volume in the nourished area is reduced with 37.568 m 3 including the packing. 17.700 m 3 is reduced in the packing process. 13.100 m 3 is placed in front of the rock s north of the nourished area, so it is now possible to walk to the other beach north of the nourished area. Operation. In the 1 year of the operation period Oct 2004 Oct. 2005, only 8.405 m 3 were lost on the beach. The beach is extended 100 meter north in the inter-monsoon time. 2

Sediment Transport Monsoon Time North East Monsoon Oct. March month. Sediment transport. Inter-monsoon Time. Sediment transport South East Monsoon April Oct. month 3

Stabilizing Period July - October 2004 Teluk Chempedak Stabilizing Period July - Oct 2004 Cubicmetre 6000 4000 2000 0-2000 -4000-6000 -8000-10000 -12000 North Ch 40 Ch 50 Ch 60 Ch 70 Ch 80 Ch 90 Ch 10 Ch 11 Ch 12 Ch 13 South Station Oct Beach Nourishment/Sand Packing In the period from May to July 2004 the beach is nourished with 177.000 m 3 In the first 3 month we have a reduction in the volume total 37.500 m 3 In the packing process the sand volume is reduced with 10 % 17.700 m 3 Net. sand loss July October 2004. 19.800 m 3 The sand was placed in a 2 metre thick layer out to 130 meter from the reference line against the sea. After the first 3 month the sand is stabilized in a new equilibrium profile. Sand-movements. The nourishment is done in the inter-monsoon time, where the current is direction north. Analyses of the survey shows, that 13.100 m 3 have taken place north of the nourished area around ch. 300. The other 6.700 m 3 is gone outside in direction to the sea. Analyses of the area 50 m x 1000 m outside the nourished area shows in the October survey 2004, that the seabed is raised average 60 cm on 50.000 m 2 equal to 30.000 m 3. We have afterwards registered a new bar system in front of the beach. Further analyses shows that 12.500 m 3 is spill over effect from the beach nourishment. 4

Off Shore Conditions. Off Shore 50 Metre Development 1,0 0,8 0,6 Metre 0,4 0,2 0,0-0,2 Ch 400 Ch 500 Ch 600 Ch 700 Ch 800 Ch 900 Ch 1000 Ch 1100 Ch 1200 Channel Oct 2004 Oct 2005 Bar System Oct. 2004 10 m 20 m 30 m 40 m 50 m Average Ch 400 0,6 0,4 0,5 0,8 0,4 0,54 Ch 500 0,8 1,1 1 0,7 0,4 0,8 Ch 600 0,8 1,1 0,7 0,9 0,4 0,78 Ch 700 1,1 1,1 1 0,6 0,4 0,84 Ch 800 0,3 0,6 0,6 0,5 0,2 0,44 Ch 900 0,8 1 0,8 0,3 0,2 0,62 Ch 1000 0,9 0,8 0,5 0,1 0,2 0,5 Ch 1100 1 0,8 0,6 0,3 0,2 0,58 Ch 1200 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1 0,3 0,7555556 0,8111111 0,6666667 0,4888889 0,2777778 0,6 Bar System Oct 2005 10 m 20 m 30 m 40 m 50 m Average Ch 400 0-0,3-0,1-0,1 0-0,1 Ch 500 0,6 0,9 0,6 0,2-0,1 0,44 Ch 600 0,6 0,8 0,8 0,4 0,2 0,56 Ch 700 0,9 0,6 0,3-0,1-0,2 0,3 Ch 800 0,5 0,9 0,8 0,4 0,2 0,56 Ch 900 0,9 0,6 0,4 0,1-0,1 0,38 Ch 1000 0,5 0,3 0 0-0,1 0,14 Ch 1100 0,3 0 0 0-0,2 0,02 Ch 1200 0,2 0,1-0,1-0,2-0,3-0,06 0,5 0,4333333 0,3 0,0777778-0,0666667 0,2488889 The off shore area in the front of the nourished area is 50.000 m 2. The average off shore bed level is raised with 60 cm in the stabilizing period from July - October 2004. 5

Spill Over Effect Beach nourishment May July 2005. 0,4 Spill Over Effect from Beach Nourishmen 0,3 Metre 0,2 0,1 0,0 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Average In relation to the beach nourishment we have registered a spill over effect from the nourishment. The data is based on the survey Mach to July 2005. Spill over effect from the beach nourishment. 10 20 30 40 50 Average 400 0,7 0,5 0,3 0,3 0,2 0,4 500 0 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,3 0,14 600 0,6 0,3 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,26 700 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,2 0,26 800 0,8 0,4 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,3 900 0,1 0,1 0,3 0,2 0,2 0,18 1000 0,2 0,1 0 0 0,3 0,12 1100 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,28 1200 0 0,3 0,3 0,2 0,4 0,24 Average 0,311 0,278 0,211 0,178 0,233 0,242 Total The spill over effect is 12.000 m 3 6

Outside Area North Ch 300. Ch 300 Oct 2004 Average 1,8 2,2 1,8 2,4 2,5 1,8 0,4 0,1 0,1 1,456 13100 Cubic Metre Ch 300 Oct 2005 Average 0,9 2 1,5 0,3 0,5 1,04 5200 Cubic Metre Calculation of sand volume in Ch. 300 north of the nourished area. The picture show the situation in Oct 2004, where13.100 Cubic Meter sand was placed north of the nourished area after the stabilizing period from July - Oct 2004 In October 2005 we have registered an equal situation, but only 5.200 m 3 was placed in front of the rocks in ch. 300. 7

Bar system. After the beach nourishment May July 2004, we have registered a bar-system outside the beach with breaking waves. 8

Coastal profile off shore Ch. 400-1200 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,3 Metre 0,2 0,1 0,0 Ch 400 Ch 500 Ch 600 Ch 700 Ch 800 Ch 900 Ch 1000 Ch 1100 Ch 1200-0,1 Off Shore level Oct 03-oct 05 Oct 2005 We see clearly the SIC effect outside the drained area. 9

Operation year 1 - October 2004/05 10000 Teluk Chempedak First Year Operation - Oct 2004/05 Cubic Metre. 5000 0-5000 -10000-15000 North Ch 40 Ch 50 Ch 60 Ch 70 Ch 80 Ch 90Ch 10 Ch 11 Ch 12 Ch 13South Station July March Oct. Beach development Oct-March March-July July-Oct Northern Slope -2064,4 993,6 746,1 m3 Ch 368/468-11770,7 3748,2 4435,4 m3 Ch 468/568-6293,8 953,1 3683,5 m3 Ch 568/668-2259 -316,1 2051,3 m3 Ch 668/768-3502,2 1243,8-277,3 m3 Ch768/868 276,6 1029,6-563,1 m3 Ch868/968 1530,5 392,6-373,6 m3 Ch968/1068 1520-1574,3 19,7 m3 Ch1068/1168 2905,3-1701,4-3477,7 m3 Ch1168/1268 6924,9-463,1-9347,3 m3 Ch1268/1300 2671,2-128,1-3079 m3 Southern Slope 6856,7-3810,5-3941,1 m3 Development -3204,9 367,4-10123,1-12960,6 m3 Monsoon time. The sand loss in the beach is only 3204,9 m 3 in the monsoon time from October to March. Inter-monsoon time. From March to July the beach is increased with 367 m 3 From July to Oct 2005 the beach is eroded with -10123 m 3. From July - October 2005 is 5.200 m 3 gone to the north in Ch 300, but is not lost in the profile. The total loss inside the nourished area is 12.960 m 3. in year 1 in the operation period Oct. 2004/5. 10

Conclusion The sand movement in the stabilizing period July Oct 2004 is 19.800 m 3 out of the nourished area, but the sand is still inside in the bay. 3.205 m 3 sand of the nourishment is lost south out of the bay in the monsoon time from Oct 04 to March 05. 5.200 m is gone to the north in ch. 300 during the inter-monsoon time, but is still inside in front of the rocks. 5000 m 3 is gone off shore in the inter-monsoon time and is lost. The conclusion is that 8.405 m 3 is lost in year 1 from Oct 2004 Oct 2005. The beach is extended 100 meter north in the inter-monsoon time. In relation to the net. beach nourishment on 159.300 m 3, the loss is 5,3% in the first year. Malaysia 04.12-2005. Poul Jakobsen. Appendix The SIC system is now being tested on the west coast of Jutland in Denmark, and controlled by Professor Hans Falk Burcharth AUC and professor Jørgen Fredsøe DTU. The west coast of Jutland is a very rough place with wave heights up to 6 metre and wind speed up to 33 m/sec. The result after 6 month shows an increase on 265.000 m 3 in the area with the SIC system and only 27.000 m 3 in the area without the drain system. The project is 11 km. 5,6 km with the SIC drain system and the reference area s 5,4 km. The long shore sediment transport in the area is 2,3 mill. m 3 net. per year. The drained area of the beach is now stabilized in an equilibrium profile 4x 100 metre. 100 meter wide and 4 meter high in the dune foot. On this background we know, it will be possible to stabilize the east coast of Malaysia with the SIC System. 11

12

Environmentally Friendly Coastal Protection Pilot Project Southern Holmsland Barrier on the Danish West Coast Accumulation of sand in 6 month. Test area 2 The beach width has increased up to 65 metre, 34 Metres average in test area 2 SIC Skagen innovations Center Dr. Alexandrinesvej 75 Dk 9990 Skagen Denmark Ph +45 98 44 57 13 Mob +45 40 40 14 25 Web: www.shore.dk Mail : sic@shore.dk 13

Project area. The Project is situated between Hvide Sande and Nymindegab on the Holmsland Barrier at the Danish West Coast. Fig. 1 Reference area 1 st. 9200 11000 Project area 1 st. 4500 9200 Reference area 2 st. 2800 4400 Project area 2 st. 1800 2700 Reference area 3 st 0 1700 14

As illustrated in fig. 1, the Project is divided in areas with PEM modules (5600 Metres total) and reference areas (5400 Metres total). The purpose is to measure and document the effect of the SIC System in comparison with the areas without the modules. Results of surveys January, April and July, 2005. The survey and data in this project are done by the independent consulting engineering company Carl Bro A/S. The results shows, that the sand accretion where the beach is drained by the SIC System is 10 times greater, than the areas with no modules. The increase of sand in the pressure equalized areas was 265.000 m3 (5.600 Metres), compared with the reference areas (5.400 Metres), where the sand accretion only was 27.000 m3. However, these results will not appear in the first 6 month official evaluation report, as all data has to be recalculated, so volume the calculations shows the total volume accretion of sand on the test areas where there has been accumulation. SIC do not agree in the statement, which says, that the beaches will build up during the summer period. We can prove it by the results in reference area 1 and 2. In Ref 2, there has been an erosion of 31.000 m3 on the beach during the summer period, which resulted in a decrease in beach height of -24 cm in Ref 2. Therefore we can expect damages on the dunes in reference area 1 and 2 during winter 2005/6, like the erosion damages we have seen on the Søndervig Beach during winter 2004/5. 15

SIC Field test Holmsland Barrier 6 month result 2005 Volume Calculation 200000 150000 Cubic Metre 100000 50000 0-50000 Ref 1 Rør 1 Ref 2 Rør 2 Ref 3 Jan - July 2005 8452,5 190560-31608 74500 50278 Jan - July 2005 The increase of sand in the pressure equalized areas was 265.000 m3, compared with the reference areas where the sand accretion only was 27.000 m3. The Project is divided in areas with PEM modules (5600 Metres total) and reference areas (5400 Metres total). Skodbjerge Jan - July 2005 80 60 40 20 0-20 Ref 3 Test Area 2 Ref 2 Test Area 1 Ref 1 April 23,15 59,42-8,47 35,78 12,88 July 28,73 74,5-18,59 39,7 4,83 Cubic Metre/Metre April July The figure shows the sand accretion/erosion in m3 along the beach. The result are significant. 16

Beach Width. Beach Width July 2005 200,00 180,00 ref 3 test area 2 ref 2 test area 1 ref 1 160,00 140,00 120,00 metre 100,00 80,00 a3 (m) a2 (m) 60,00 40,00 20,00 0,00 st. x 100 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101 106 111 The beach width is between 80 and 120 Metres in test area 1 and 2 and the beach is elevated average by 38 cm in the test area 1, and 66 cm in test area 2. In test area 2 is the average beach width increased from 78 Metres to 112,4 Metres from January to July 2005. In contrast to the test areas, reference area 2 beach elevation has decreased by -24 cm. We can expect damages to the dune in reference area 1 stn. 10000, where the beach width only is 50 Metres. We can expect huge damages to the dune in reference area 2 stn. 4100-4300, where the beach width is only 20 Metres. SIC is now briefing the Minister of Transport about the risk of severe damage in the reference areas 1 and 2, and we are recommending that the SIC System is implemented in these areas. It has been decided in the project group, that a new calculation model will be used in the project, because the current models can not be used on advancing beaches in the test areas. Skagen d. 11 October 2005. Poul Jakobsen 17